DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 20—Wildlife Code: Definitions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 20—Wildlife Code: Definitions Rules of Department of Conservation Division 10—Conservation Commission Chapter 20—Wildlife Code: Definitions Title Page 3 CSR 10-20.805 Definitions ......................................................................................3 JOHN R. ASHCROFT (7/31/21) CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS 1 Secretary of State Chapter 20—Wildlife Code: Definitions 3 CSR 10-20 Title 3—DEPARTMENT OF mechanically-powered. upstream from Melvin Price Locks and Dam. CONSERVATION Division 10—Conservation Commission (9) Cervid: All species of the deer family (15) Commercial waters: The flowing por- Chapter 20—Wildlife Code: Definitions (family Cervidae) including those commonly tions of the Missouri River, the Mississippi known as white-tailed, mule, fallow, sika, River except in Sand Chute below the mouth 3 CSR 10-20.805 Definitions red, musk, Pere David’s deer, moose, cari- of the Salt River in Pike County, and that part bou, reindeer, elk, or wapiti, and all deer- of the St. Francis River which forms a bound- PURPOSE: This rule defines words and hybrids. ary between the states of Arkansas and terms used in the Code. Missouri, and also waters which exist tem- (10) Chase or chased: The act of using dogs porarily through overflow from the (1) For the purpose of this Code the following to follow wildlife or feral swine for the pur- Mississippi River east of the Missouri Pacific definitions shall govern unless a different pose of recreation or dog training, but not for Railroad between Cape Girardeau and Scott meaning is stated or clearly evident from the the purpose of catching or taking that wildlife City, and east of the Mississippi River main- context. or feral swine. line and setback levees between Commerce and the Arkansas state line. (2) Antlered deer: A deer having at least one (11) Circus: A scheduled staged event in (1) antler not less than three inches (3") long. which entertainment includes performances (16) Commission: The Conservation by trained wildlife, either native or nonnative Commission as specified in Section 3, (3) Antlered elk: An elk having at least one to the continental United States, and in which Reorganization Act of 1974, pursuant to (1) antler not less than six inches (6") long. physical contact between wildlife and humans Article IV, Section 40(a) of the Constitution is restricted to the handlers, performers, or of Missouri (see also Article IV, Section 12). (4) Arm of lake: An inlet or bay of a water other circus employees. impoundment, including all impounded trib- (17) Crossbow: A device for discharging utaries, smaller arms, and coves thereof other (12) Closed season: That period of time dur- quarrels or bolts, formed of a bow set cross- than those specifically excepted. ing which the pursuit or taking of wildlife is wise on a stock, usually drawn by means of a prohibited by this Code. mechanism and discharged by release of a (5) Atlatl: A rod or narrow board-like device trigger. used to launch, through a throwing motion of (13) Commercial establishment: Any place of the arm, a dart five to eight feet (5'–8') in business, owned or operated by any person or (18) Days or dates: All days and dates shall length. group of persons, or business concern of any be inclusive. A day shall begin or end at mid- kind, where ordinary trade or business prac- night, unless otherwise specified. (6) Backwater: Any flowing or nonflowing tices are conducted. This term shall include, water lying exclusively within the floodplain but is not restricted to, any club, association, (19) Department: The Department of of a river and connected to that river at any or society where meals, lodging, or other ser- Conservation as specified in Section 3, water level below official flood stage, as des- vices or facilities are furnished for a consid- Reorganization Act of 1974, pursuant to ignated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers eration, price, or fee. Article IV, Section 40(a) of Constitution of for the portion of the river where backwater Missouri (see also Article IV, Section 12). is occurring. Backwater shall not include (14) Commercial fish: All fish except endan- tributary streams and ditches, but may gered species as listed in 3 CSR 10-4.111(3), (20) Director: The director of the include side channels, chutes, sloughs, bay- alligator gar, and game fish as defined in this Department of Conservation. ous, oxbows, and blew holes. rule. Includes those species for which sale is permitted when legally obtained. For purpos- (21) Ditch: Any artificial drainageway, tribu- (7) Bow: A device drawn and held by hand es of this Code, packaged salt water species tary to a stream or body of water, and con- and not fastened to a stock nor to any other or freshwater species not found in waters of taining sufficient water to support fish. mechanism that maintains the device in a this state, when the processed fish are truly drawn position. This definition includes long- labeled as to content, point of origin, and (22) Domicile: The place where a person has bows, recurve bows, and compound bows. name and address of the processor, are his/her true, fixed, and permanent home and exempt from restrictions applicable to native principal establishment and to which whenev- (8) Cable restraint device: A device for the commercial fish. Commercial fish include er s/he is absent s/he has the intention of live-capture of certain furbearers in a non- crayfish taken from waters open to commer- returning. It is his/her legal residence, as dis- water set by use of a cable loop made of cial fishing. In the Mississippi River and that tinguished from his/her temporary place or stranded steel cable, not greater than five feet part of the St. Francis River which forms the abode; or his/her home, as distinguished (5') long (not including extensions), with a boundary between the states of Arkansas and from a place to which business or pleasure diameter of not less than five sixty-fourths Missouri, commercial fish also include chan- may temporarily call him/her. inch (5/64") and equipped with a commer- nel, blue, and flathead catfish at least fifteen cially manufactured breakaway rated at three inches (15") in total length. In the Mississippi (23) Drowning set: Trap or snare sets con- hundred fifty pounds (350 lbs.) or less, a River only, commercial fish also include pad- structed with a solid fiber or steel rod or relaxing-type lock, a stop device that prevents dlefish at least twenty-four inches (24") in cable, anchored at each end, having a drown- it from closing to less than two and one-half length (measured from eye to fork of tail) and ing lock attached to the trap or snare allowing inches (2 1/2") in diameter, and an anchor shovelnose sturgeon twenty-four inches to the trap or snare to only slide one (1) way, swivel, but shall not be equipped with a com- thirty-two inches (24"–32") in length (mea- and located in water at a depth sufficient for pression-type choke spring, or be otherwise sured from tip of snout to fork of tail) drowning. JOHN R. ASHCROFT (7/31/21) CODE OF STATE REGULATIONS 3 Secretary of State 3 CSR 10-20—DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION Division 10—Conservation Commission (24) Established field trial area: One (1) con- snipe. twenty-six inches (26") as measured between tiguous tract of privately-owned land that is the muzzle of the barrel and the rearmost fenced or enclosed in a manner to reasonably (30) Game fish: Shall include the following in portion of the firearm (excluding any pistol prevent dogs pursuing or chasing wildlife which the common names are to be interpret- brace, muzzle device, or other firearm acces- from leaving the area, where the primary use ed as descriptive of, but not limiting, the sory not permanently attached to the of the land is for training dogs to pursue and classification by Latin names. firearm). The use of a pistol brace is specifi- chase wildlife or to conduct field trials. (A) Ambloplites, all species of goggle-eye cally authorized, and a second hand may be (commonly known as Ozark bass, rock bass, used for support when firing. (25) Field trial: An organized event, contest, shadow bass) and their hybrids. demonstration, or trial of dogs whether or not (B) Esox, all species commonly known as (34) Hook: Single- or multiple-pronged prizes or awards of any kind are offered, and muskellunge, tiger muskie, muskie-pike hooks and the ordinary artificial lures with where dogs may be used to chase, locate, hybrid, northern pike, chain pickerel, grass attached single- or multiple-pronged hooks pursue, or retrieve wildlife. pickerel. and dropper flies. A multiple-pronged hook (C) Ictalurus, all species except bullheads, or two (2) or more hooks employed to hold a (26) Firearms: Pistols, revolvers, and rifles commonly known as channel catfish, blue single bait, shall be considered a single hook propelling a single projectile at one (1) dis- catfish, Mississippi cat, Fulton cat, spotted in counting the allowable total in use. charge including those powered by spring, cat, white cat, willow cat, fiddler cat. air, or compressed gas, and shotguns not (D) Lepomis gulosus, commonly known as (35) Invasive fish: Shall include fish defined larger than ten (10) gauge. warmouth. as prohibited in 3 CSR 10-4.117(C) and the (E) Micropterus, all species of black bass following: (27) Flies, lures, and baits: The following are and their hybrids, commonly known as large- (A) Bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys authorized for use except where restricted in mouth bass, lineside bass, smallmouth bass, nobilis); and 3 CSR 10-6.415, 3 CSR 10-6.535, 3 CSR 10- brown bass, Kentucky bass, spotted bass.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ecological Integrity Assessment of Ozark Rivers
    ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF OZARK RIVERS TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR PROTECTIVE STATUS by Andrea Radwell Arkansas Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Department of Biological Sciences University of Arkansas Fayetteville, Arkansas 2000 COOP UNIT PUBLICATION NO. 36 ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF OZARK RIVERS TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR PROTECTIVE STATUS ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF OZARK RIVERS TO DETERMINE SUITABILITY FOR PROTECTIVE STATUS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science by Andrea Radwell, B.S., M.A. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 1971, 1972 May 2000 University of Arkansas THESIS DUPLICATION RELEASE I hereby authorize the University of Arkansas Libraries to duplicate this thesis when needed for research and/or scholarship. Agreed _______________________________________ Refused ______________________________________ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank the many people who have expressed their confidence in me, shared their expertise, and provided the encouragement and guidance needed to complete the research presented in this thesis. Without Dr. Tom Kwak’s initial confidence in my abilities to become a researcher, this project would never have been undertaken. He provided the important step in helping me develop my ideas for this project into a coherent, well-defined research agenda. He has always encouraged me to proceed, never doubting my ability to carry on. He has provided guidance from start to finish. I will always value both his friendship and his contribution to my growth as a graduate student and a researcher. Dr. Art Brown is deserving of acknowledgement for sharing his wealth of knowledge of stream ecology and his enthusiasm for studying and protecting the natural environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 Species Found in & Along the River
    3.4 Species Found In & Along the River Mammals There are many mammals found in our region that are highly dependent on the Kings River and its trib- utaries. Otter, muskrat, beaver, raccoon, white-tailed deer, mink, opossum, and squirrels are all seen regularly on the Kings River. Raccoon Procyon lotor Opossom Didelphis virginiana Mink Mustela vision Muskrat Ondatra zibethicus Steven Walling River Otter Lontra canadensis The Landowner’s Guide to Streamside Living 25 Is That Mammal a Nuisance or a Menace? Native to Arkansas, the beaver was completely Despite the use of the Razorback as a symbol for eradicated in the state by the early 1900s because Northwest Arkansas, the feral hog is a non-native of heavy trapping. Between 1926 and 1957, sev- species that is causing significant environmental enty seven beavers were restocked around the state problems in our area. Feral hogs are domesticated – leading to the rebounded population of today. swine that are released and then become “wild”. Feral hogs can wreak havoc on agricultural lands Beavers are pure vegetarians, subsisting solely on and natural habitats through their rooting and con- leaves, twigs, stems, and bark. These mammals sumption of a huge variety of food. These hogs build dams to create ponds and extend their zone eat almost anything and everything that comes of comfort. Beavers are very slow on land, and across their path. They can also spread disease to thus vulnerable to a variety of predators. Beaver both humans and domesticated animals. ponds and wetlands create habitat used by water- fowl, shorebirds, otters, fish, amphibians, and Feral hogs are very adaptive and thus very difficult aquatic plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis-1984-W576c.Pdf (7.715Mb)
    CHARACTERISTICS OF SMALLMOUTH BASS AND QZARK BASS POPULATIONS IN BUFFALO _NATIONAL JIVER, ARKANSAS By KEITH AVIS WHISENANT lt Bachelor of Science Baylor University Waco, Texas 1970 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE July, 1984 Q()( 1 I'\ ,() >s•{ " • t I toe_,, Cof. ~ CHARACTERISTICS OF SMALLMOUTH BASS AND OZARK BASS POPULATIONS IN BUFFALO NATIONAL ' RIVER, ARKANSAS Thesis Approved: ii PREFACE This study is concerned with the population characteristics of the two principal game fish species, smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieui, and Ozark bass, Ambloplites constellatus, inhabiting Buffalo National ( River. The primary objectives were to determine what effect habitat availability and/or various levels of recreational boating activity were having on these two species. I want to express my appreciation to my major advisor, Dr. O. Eugene Maughan, for his guidance, encouragement and assistance throughout this study. I also express appreciation to Dr. Anthony Echelle and Dr. Larry Talent for agreeing to serve on my committee on short notice and their assistance in preparation of this thesis. Special thanks is given to Dr. Milford R. Fletcher, Chief, Division of Natural Resource Management~ Southwest Region of the National Park Service, who established the program and provided the funding without which this study would not have been possible. Thanks are also given to Buffalo National River Superintendent Alec Gould and Chief Ranger Carl Hinrichs and their predecessors, Superintendent John Turney and Chief Ranger John Welch, who not only allowed me to take time from my regular duties to attend Oklahoma State University to accomplish this research but who also allowed other members of their staff to assist with data collection and analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Flow Alteration on Instream Habitat and Fish Assemblages
    THE INFLUENCE OF FLOW ALTERATION ON INSTREAM HABITAT AND FISH ASSEMBLAGES By NICOLE FARLESS Bachelor of Science in Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 2012 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 2015 THE INFLUENCE OF FLOW ALTERATION ON INSTREAM HABITAT AND FISH ASSEMBLAGES Thesis Approved: Shannon Brewer Thesis Adviser Todd Halihan Jim Long ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people that I need to acknowledge for their help and support throughout my Master’s research. I would like to start off thanking my advisor, Dr. Shannon Brewer. Shannon not only continually helped me broaden my knowledge of science and research but also invested her time to improve my practical knowledge as well. I would also like to thank my funding source, The Nature Conservancy and the Oklahoma Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. I would also like to thank Brian Brewer for all of his help building and developing the thermal tolerance lab. Without him I could not have completed my temperature tolerance study. I am indebted to many graduate students that have assisted with statistical, theoretical, and field work. Especially, Jonathan Harris and Robert Mollenhauer, who have volunteered countless hours editing my writing and assisting with data analysis. I would also like to thank Dr. Jim Shaw, my undergraduate advisor, for recognizing my potential and encouraging me to attend graduate school. Without him I would have never considered furthering my education. I would not have been able to complete this project without the help of the many technicians that worked hard for me in the lab and in the field: Desiree Williams, Frances Marshall, Joshua Mouser, Bailey Johnson, Emily Gardner, Spencer Wood, Cooper Sherrill, and Jake Holliday.
    [Show full text]
  • Predator-Prey Interactions Between Hellbenders
    PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN HELLBENDERS (CRYPTOBRANCHUS ALLEGANIENSIS ALLEGANIENSIS AND C. A. BISHOPI) AND NATIVE AND NONNATIVE FISHES A Thesis Presented to The Graduate College of Missouri State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science, Biology By Brian G. Gall August 2008 PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTIONS BETWEEN HELLBENDERS (CRYPTOBRANCHUS ALLEGANIENSIS ALLEGANIENSIS AND C. A. BISHOPI) AND NATIVE AND NONNATIVE FISHES Department of Biology Missouri State University, August 2008 Masters of Science Brian G. Gall ABSTRACT The introduction of nonnative fishes often results in the local extinction of native amphibians due to a lack of evolutionary history and therefore, minimally-adapted antipredator behaviors toward the introduced fishes. Populations of hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) in Missouri have declined considerably since the 1980’s, coinciding with a rapid increase in trout introductions for recreational angling. I examined hellbender and fish predator-prey interactions by: (1) examining the foraging behavior of predatory fishes in response to a hellbender secretion; (2) comparing the number of secretion and control-soaked food pellets consumed by trout; and (3) comparing the response of larval hellbenders to chemical stimuli from introduced (trout) and native fish predators. Brown trout, walleye and large banded sculpin respond to hellbender secretions with increased activity while small banded sculpin responded by decreasing activity. In addition, brown trout ingested more hellbender secretion-soaked food pellets than control pellets, while rainbow trout expelled secretion-soaked food pellets. Finally, larval hellbenders exhibited weak fright behavior in response to chemical stimuli from nonnative trout relative to their responses to native predatory fish stimuli. These combinations of responses indicate that predation by nonnative fishes may be a plausible hypothesis for the decline of hellbender populations in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Missouri Fishing Regulations 2019
    A SummarySummary of Missouri of Fishing Regulations MissouriEffective March 1, 2019 Fishing Regulations Effective March 1, 2019 DAVID STONNER DAVID DAVID STONNER DAVID Contents Sport Fishing in Missouri . .1 Permits: General Information . 2. Purchasing Permits . .3 Missouri Fishing Permits . .4 General Fishing Rules . 6. Game Fish . .8 Nongame Fish . 10 Live Bait . 12. Bullfrogs and Green Frogs . .14 Mussels and Clams . .14 Turtles . .14 Trout Fishing . .16 Reciprocal Fishing Privileges . 21 Illustrated Guide to the Fishes of Missouri . .22 How to Measure a Fish . .27 Special Area Regulations . .28 MO Fishing App . 4. 1 Fish Consumption Advisory . .42 Definitions . .44 Think You Have a Record? . .45 Contact Information . Back cover What’s New for 2019? ◾◾Lessees may no longer fish, hunt, or trap without a permit on the land that they lease . ◾◾Due to federal and state regulations, you are now required to provide a Social Security number to obtain fishing, hunting, and trapping permits . See Page 3 . Sport Fishing in Missouri When it comes to fishing, Missouri has a In Your Hands lot to offer . More than 200 species of fish The information in this live in the Show-Me State, and more than booklet is only a summary of four dozen species offer opportunities for the fishing rules and contains anglers . Seasons are long, and daily limits only those rules that affect are generous . Regulations exist to improve the ordinary sport angler . It and maintain the quality of fishing, ensure is NOT a legal document and that everyone has an equal chance of is subject to revision during catching fish, and protect aquatic resources .
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Yellow Grub (Clinostomum Marginatum) Metacercariae in Black Bass (Micropterus Spp.) from Arkansas Ozark and Ouachita Reservoir Lakes James J
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarWorks@UARK Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 67 Article 31 2013 Distribution of Yellow Grub (Clinostomum marginatum) Metacercariae in Black Bass (Micropterus spp.) from Arkansas Ozark and Ouachita Reservoir Lakes James J. Daly Sr. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Animal Diseases Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Daly, James J. Sr. (2013) "Distribution of Yellow Grub (Clinostomum marginatum) Metacercariae in Black Bass (Micropterus spp.) from Arkansas Ozark and Ouachita Reservoir Lakes," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 67 , Article 31. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol67/iss1/31 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This General Note is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 67 [2013], Art. 31 Distribution of Yellow Grub (Clinostomum marginatum) Metacercariae in Black Bass (Micropterus spp.) from Arkansas Ozark and Ouachita Reservoir Lakes J.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Quality Assessment of the Ozark Plateaus Study Unit, Arkansas
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE OZARK PLATEAUS STUDY UNIT, ARKANSAS, KANSAS, MISSOURI, AND OKLAHOMA--FISH COMMUNITIES IN STREAMS OF THE OZARK PLATEAUS AND THEIR RELATIONS TO SELECTED ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS By James C. Petersen Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4155 National Water-Quality Assessment Program U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas J. Casadevall, Acting Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, WRD Branch of Information Services 401 Hardin Road Box 25286 Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225 This information will help support the develop- FOREWORD ment and evaluation of management, regulatory, and The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey monitoring decisions by other Federal, State, and local (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the earth agencies to protect, use, and enhance water resources. resources of the Nation and to provide information that The goals of the NAWQA Program are being will assist resource managers and policymakers at Fed- achieved through investigations of 60 of the Nation’s eral, State, and local levels in making sound decisions. most important river basins and aquifer systems, which Assessment of water-quality conditions and trends is an are referred to as study units. These study units are dis- important part of this overall mission. tributed throughout the Nation and cover a diversity of One of the greatest challenges faced by water- hydrogeologic settings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fishes of Crooked Creek (White River Drainage) in Northcentral Arkansas, with New Records and a List of Species
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 65 Article 16 2011 The iF shes of Crooked Creek (White River Drainage) in Northcentral Arkansas, with New Records and a List of Species H. W. Robison Southern Arkansas University C. T. McAllister Eastern Oklahoma State College, [email protected] K. E. Shirley Arkansas Game and Fish Commission Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Robison, H. W.; McAllister, C. T.; and Shirley, K. E. (2011) "The iF shes of Crooked Creek (White River Drainage) in Northcentral Arkansas, with New Records and a List of Species," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 65 , Article 16. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol65/iss1/16 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 65 [2011], Art. 16 The Fishes of Crooked Creek (White River Drainage) in Northcentral Arkansas, with New Records and a List of Species H.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilson's Creek National Battlefield
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/HTLN/NRR—2011/427 ON THE COVER Missouri State Guardsmen fighting on Bloody Hill Scene from interpretive film Wilson’s Creek National Battlefield Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/HTLN/NRR—2011/427 Gust M. Annis1, Michael D. DeBacker2, David D. Diamond1, Lee F Elliott1, Aaron J. Garringer1, Phillip A. Hanberry1, Kevin M. James2, Ronnie D. Lee1, Michael E. Morey1, Dyanna L. Pursell1, and Craig C. Young2 1Missouri Resource Assessment Partnership (MoRAP) School of Natural Resources University of Missouri 4200 New Haven Road Columbia, MO 65201 2National Park Service Heartland I&M Network 6424 West Farm Road 182 Republic, MO 65738 July 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 73 Article 1 2019 Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science - Volume 73, 2019 Academy Editors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Engineering Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Medicine and Health Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Editors, Academy (2019) "Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science - Volume 73, 2019," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 73 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol73/iss1/1 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Entire Issue is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science - Volume 73, 2019 Erratum The following changes have been made to the on-line copy of the journal: Alexander and North (page 21-30) was retracted from the journal. Braund et al (page 93-105) was updated (see individual article page for details) This entire issue is available in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/ vol73/iss1/1 Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol.
    [Show full text]