Taxation Start Here
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY March 5, 1996 In
* * * PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY March 5, 1996 In accordance with the Warrant the polls were opened at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m. The voters cast their ballots in their respective precincts. The results were as follows: DEMOCRATIC PARTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE Bill Clinton 24 59 24 21 39 81 71 57 63 25 464 Lyndon N. LaRouche Jr 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 5 1 1 13 No Preference 1 1 1 0 3 2 0 5 3 1 17 All Others 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 2 11 Blanks 0 0 3 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 11 TOTAL 28 64 28 21 45 85 74 73 69 29 516 STATE COMMITTEE MAN Stanley C. Rosenberg 23 55 27 20 35 74 61 63 61 27 446 Blanks 5 9 1 1 10 11 13 10 8 2 70 TOTAL 28 64 28 21 45 85 74 73 69 29 516 STATE COMMITTEE WOMAN Mary L. Ford 22 48 22 17 29 60 56 55 52 22 383 All Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blanks 6 16 6 4 16 25 18 18 17 7 133 TOTAL 28 64 28 21 45 85 74 73 69 29 516 TOWN COMMITTEE Mary Sidney Treyz 11 17 16 11 17 15 31 26 40 24 208 Florence C. Frank 10 21 16 12 19 22 28 28 45 21 222 Dolores D. -
Recent Cases
Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 23 Issue 4 Issue 4 - May 1970 Article 7 5-1970 Recent Cases Law Review Staff Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Law Review Staff, Recent Cases, 23 Vanderbilt Law Review 809 (1970) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol23/iss4/7 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECENT CASES Accountants-Auditors-Compliance with General Accounting Principles Not a Complete Defense To Criminal Fraud Defendants' are members of a certified public accounting firm which was retained annually by Continental Vending Corporation (Continental) to audit its financial statements. While conducting a yearly audit, defendants learned that an affiliated company, Valley Commercial Corporation (Valley),2 was not in a position to repay its debt 3 to Continental. .The president of Valley, however, offered to secure the debt personally. Defendants determined that if adequate collateral' was posted, Continental's statements could be certified without reviewing Valley's books.5 The collateral was obtained,, its value was confirmed,7 and the receivable was entered on the balance sheet8 subject to an explanation in a footnote.' The statements were 1. Defendants are a senior partner, a junior partner, and a senior associate in the national accounting firm of Lybrand, Ross Bros. -
Hanover Annual Report FY 1996
~ ~"'° ~ ~ ~ t: lr) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t-..j ~ ~ ~ ;::~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ;::: ~ ~ ONEHUNDRED AND FORTY-FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT of the OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES of the TOWN OF HANOVER FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1996 In Memoriam Michael J. Ahern 1925 - 1996 Veterans' A3enl francis J. Curran 1940 - 1996 Coordinalor of Education, Technolcsical Media (?5 Libraries lianover Middle &hool Dale A. Lochiallo 1948 - 1996 Elderly &rvices Direclor Council on A3in8 Muriel L. Mdlman 1919 - 1996 Librarian John Curlis free Library Peler Q_ Melanson 1947 - 1996 Dispalcher - J\ssislanl 6upervisor Emef8ency Communicalions Cenler Edward J. Norcoll, Jr. 1912 - 1996 Veterans' A3enl Wilmot Q_ Prall 1929 - 1996 Cuslodian lianover &hool Deparlmenl 2 HANOVER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1971-1972 STUDENT COUNCIL TOWN OF HANOVER PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS Tenth Congressional District WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Quincy COUNCILLOR Second Councillor District KELLY A. TIMILTY, Canton STATE SENATOR ROBERTS. CREEDON, JR., Brockton STATE REPRESENTATIVE Fifth Plymouth Representative District JANET W. O'BRIEN, Hanover COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ROBERT J. STONE, Whitman JOSEPH F. McDONOUGH, Scituate PETER G. ASIAF, JR., Brockton Population - Federal Census 11,918 Town Census 12,862 4 ELECTED TOWN OFFICERS SELECTMEN Albert R. Cavanagh 1997 George H. Lewald 1998 Robert J. Nyman 1999 ASSESSORS Robert C. Shea, Chr. 1997 Juleen D. Gantly, resigned* 1998 David C. Bond 1999 *Harald D. Carlson TOWNCLERK William F. Flynn 1998 TAX COLLECTOR Joan T. Port 1998 SCHOOL COMMITTEE Frederick L. Briggs, Chr. 1997 Edward F. Mc Vinney, Vice Chr. 1997 Joseph Bellantoni 1998 John D. Guenard 1999 Michael J. Cianciola, Sec. BOARD OF HEALTH Joseph F. Casna, Jr., Chr. 1997 Leslie J. Molyneaux 1998 Jerome D. -
THE LANGUAGE of TAX PROTESTS © Monica Haven, E.A
THE LANGUAGE OF TAX PROTESTS © Monica Haven, E.A. 120704 Language and the Law Professor Peter Tiersma Loyola Law School Fall 2004 Monica Haven [email protected] Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................... 1 A. The Purpose of Protest B. Philosophy of Protest C. Syllabus II. THE PRE-DETERMINED OUTCOME ................................................ 6 A. Tax Protesters Defined B. Judicial Response III. THE LANGUAGE OF PROTEST .......................................................... 8 A. Parsing The Code 1. “Individuals” Defined Statutory Definition Common Usage Trade Usage 2. “Income” Defined The Protester’s Misconstrued Precedent Quotes Taken Out Of Context The Burden Of Proof Is Improperly Shifted B. Common Defects IV. TAX SCAMS ........................................................................................... 19 V. JUDICIAL REASONING ...................................................................... 21 A. Historic Development B. Pre-empting Future Protests 1. Finding Support in Constitutional Construction 2. Applying the Plain Meaning Rule 3. Applicable Canons VI. JUDICIAL PREJUDICE ....................................................................... 30 A. Are Judges Passing The Buck? B. Are Judges Afraid? C. Protester Victories? 1. Retrials 2. Settlements 3. Criminal Convictions D. Victories Are Not Always What They Seem VII. CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 36 i THE LANGUAGE -
Results for March 26, 1996 Primary Election
Susan B. Aitderisoit '» County €lcrk/R«|^strar of Voters STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST AT THE PRIMARY ELECTION HELD ON MARCH 26, 1996 IN THE COUNTY OF FRESNO STATE OF CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CLERK TO RESULTS OF THE CANVASS STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )ss. County of Fresno ) I, SUSAN B ANDERSON, County Clerk/Registrar of Voters of the County of Fresno, State of California, do hereby certify that pursuant to the provisions of Section 15301 et seq of the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the vote cast in the County of Fresno, at the election held on March 26, 1996, for the Federal, State and Local Offices and Measures submitted to the vote of the voters, and that the Statement of the Vote Cast, to which this certificate is attached, shows the whole number of votes cast in the said county and in each ofthe respective precincts therein, and that the totals of the respective columns and the totals shown for the offices are full, true and correct. WniMESS my hand and Official Seal this 11th day of April, 1996. SUSAN B. ANDERSON County Clerk/Registrar of Voters N(^RMA LOGAN/ ^ Assistant Registrar of Voters FRESNO COUNTY - DIRECT PRIMARY ELECTION PAGE 1 MARCH 26. 1996 PRINTED ON 04/11/96 AT 12.09.15 FINAL REPORT OFFICIAL REPORT NUMBER 11 I PRESIDENT OEM 649/649 I PRESIDENT OEM 472/472 I U S REPRESENTATIVE OEM I VOTE FOR 1 I 19TH DIST VOTE FOR 1 I 19TH DIST VOTE FOR 1 I BILL CLINTON 49396 89.6 I BILL CLINTON 36870 89.5 I PAUL BARILE 29034 99.8 I I LYNDON H. -
THE BIGGEST CON How the Government Is Fleecing You
On October 8, 1974, before a joint session of the Congress, President Ford call- ed "inflation, our public enemy No. 1." Schiffs thesis is that since it's the Federal government that causes that inflation, it's the Federal government that is, in reality, "public enemy No. 1" — and blistering chapters add to this in- dictment. With irrefutable evidence and driving logic, he accuses the Federal government of converting the American economy to national socialism and turning American workers into Federal peons. With facts and figures he shows how, when, and why the Federal government: • Causes inflation • Steals more from the public in a week than the Mafia does in a year • Declared official bankruptcy three times since 1970 • Created the energy crisis • Legislates unemployment, poverty and crime • Fraudulently conceals the nation's $8 trillion public debt • Unconstitutionally enforces a fraudulently acquired power to tax income, and • Why Social Security is a gigantic fraud from which taxpayers can now legally "drop out" • Why the Federal government is nothing but a profit making* business monopoly, and • Why he has paid no.income taxes since 1973. * For those who run it. IRWIN A. SCHIFF THE BIGGEST CON How The Government Is Fleecing You Foreword by John Chamberlain jfretbom Pooktf Las Vegas, Nevada Illustrations and Graphs by Emanuel Zeid Cover by Danial Brown Copyright 1976, 1977 by Irwin A. Schiff All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in connection with a review. Manufactured In the United States of America ISBN 0-930374-01-0 PRINTING HISTORY Arlington House Edition - Published April, 1976 Freedom Books Edition - Published August, 1977 Freedoms Book. -
Policy Document: Peter Kershaw's Tax Approach, Form #08.010
POLICY DOCUMENT: PETER KERSHAW’S TAX APPROACH Last revised: 1/4/2008 Policy Document: Peter Kershaw’s Tax Approach 1 of 47 Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry ,http://sedm.org Form 08.010, Rev. 1-4-2008 EXHIBIT:________ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Rebutted version of “The Power to Tax is the Power to Destroy” ................................................. 8 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Part 1 .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Part 2 ........................................................................................................................................................................ 21 3 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................ 42 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Constitutional Provisions 16th Amendment .............................................................................................................................................................. 20, 31 Article IV .............................................................................................................................................................................. -
Idiot Legal Arguments: a Casebook for Dealing with Extremist Legal Arguments
http://www.adl.org/mwd/suss1.asp Last Updated, August 29, 1999 Idiot Legal Arguments: A Casebook for Dealing with Extremist Legal Arguments By Bernard J. Sussman, JD, MLS, CP Foreword (by Mark Pitcavage) What follows this introduction is a truly extraordinary collection of cases and decisions dealing with the "paper terrorism" tactics of the so-called "patriot" movement. While some members of this movement prefer the use of guns or bombs, the weapons of choice for many others are harassing lawsuits, harassing filings, bogus documents ranging from counterfeit money to counterfeit identification cards, tax protest arguments, and many related activities. Often these tactics are accompanied by bizarre legal or, more accurately, pseudolegal language. Many people who encounter such tactics for the first time are surprised and sometimes confused by the strange and unexpected arguments that show up in the courtroom. Bernard Sussman has compiled the most extensive collection ever of legal citations and rulings related to these "patriot" arguments. This exhaustive concordance will be a valuable resource to attorneys and judges who will be thankful to discover that previous courts have often dealt with these issues before. However, this guide is also useful to laymen and others outside the judicial system willing to wade through all the citations. It is particularly valuable in helping people to understand the energy and ingenuity with which these extremist individuals seek to undermine or pervert the legal system through radical reinterpretations of our society’s laws. Taken together, these arguments, frivolous though they may be, represent an assault on the judicial system by people who would like to consider themselves immune to the laws that govern modern society. -
Congress's Choices for Economic Substance Gamemakers Charlene Luke University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected]
University of Florida Levin College of Law UF Law Scholarship Repository UF Law Faculty Publications Faculty Scholarship Spring 2013 The Relevance Games: Congress's Choices for Economic Substance Gamemakers Charlene Luke University of Florida Levin College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub Part of the Tax Law Commons Recommended Citation Charlene D. Luke, The Relevance Games: Congress's Choices for Economic Substance Gamemakers, 66 Tax Law. 551 (2013), available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/627 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at UF Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UF Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UF Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Relevance Games: Congress's Choices for Economic Substance Gamemakers CHARLENE D. LUKE* ABSTRACT Codification of the economic substance doctrine in 2010 ushered in a new phase in the debate regarding the meaning and reach of the doctrine. The main statutory hint as to the intended scope of the codified economic sub- stance doctrine is ambiguous, providing, "The determination of whether the economic substance doctrine is relevant to a transaction shall be made in the same manner as if this subsection had never been enacted." This Article argues that this language should be read in light of the codification history, which stretches back for over ten years before enactment. This history sug- gests that the relevance provision is primarily about maintaining the precodi- fication balance of decision making between tax agencies and courts. -
Tax Deposition Questions: 8. Courts Are Closed
TAX DEPOSITION QUESTIONS: 8. COURTS ARE CLOSED TAX DEPOSITION QUESTIONS: 8. COURTS ARE CLOSED 8. COURTS ARE CLOSED Introduction The Courts act in collusion with the Executive and the Legislative to perpetrate the income tax fraud and deny the Constitutional protections of Due Process and Separation of Powers. Findings and Conclusions With the following series of questions, we will demonstrate that the federal courts are involved in a conspiracy to protect and uphold the federal income tax, in violation of the laws of the United States, the U.S. Constitution, and that these acts amount to Treason against the sovereign People described in Article III of the Constitution and punishable by execution. We will also show that: ● Even for crimes where the punishment includes incarceration, tax defendants are routinely denied the right to present defenses based on the Constitution. ● The Courts act in collusion with the Executive and the Legislative to perpetrate the income tax fraud. Section Summary Witnesses: ● Irwin Schiff (National Tax Expert) ● Joseph Banister (Ex. IRS Criminal Investigator) ● John Turner (Ex. IRS Collection) Transcript Acrobat version of this section including questions and evidence (large: 5.99 Mbytes) Further Study On Our Website: ● What Happened to Justice: Why There's No Justice in Federal Court and What to Do About It (OFFSITE LINK) - SEDM ● Arguments Against Nonpublication of Court Rulings ● Authorities on Jurisdiction of Federal Courts ● Conflict of Interest Convictions-Antishyster News Magazine, Vol. 8, No. 1 ● Do Judges Lie? ● Great IRS Hoax book: ❍ Section 1: Introduction ❍ Chapter 6: History of Federal Government Income Tax Fraud, Racketeering, and Extortion in the U.S.A. -
Peter Schiff's Pill-Gram!
PETER SCHIFF’S PILL-GRAM! A Spook Inside Euro-Pacific Capital! Presented August 2017 by Charles Savoie (Historical PM Research & Pilgrims Society Research) This is not about a copper gram; it’s about a flim-flam scam PILL-GRAM with an untrustworthy program! Members of secret societies in the financial system should give us all a caution! Peter Schiff of Euro-Pacific Capital has a real live PLANT in his organization! If you never heard of The Pilgrims Society before, just Google it. I’m singly responsible for most of the web content, which is why they hate my guts! I have trespassed their secrecy while they had everybody distracted by Bilderberg and Skull & Bones! As noted last time out in “PILL-GRAMS Scamming TV Gold Consumers,” I was fortunate to recently obtain a 2014 roster where for years I was stuck with a 1980 roster. This was a major breakthrough, because while Bilderberg releases lists, this one does not---unless you’re a member. This is the Money Trust personified, of the Old World and the New World, and hovering over the financiers I was forced to realize are the British Royal family. They rank the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and all other financier dynasties. They decide who will be admitted, who won’t be, and occasionally, who will be expelled as in the case of Jewish financier Sir Edgar Speyer, in The Pilgrims London 1914 but removed and absent from the 1924 list. In December 1921 King George V of England, head of The Pilgrims Society, also removed Speyer from the Privy Council, which has always been publicly visible. -
The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments November 30, 2007 I
THE TRUTH ABOUT FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS NOVEMBER 30, 2007 I. FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS IN GENERAL .............................................1 A. The Voluntary Nature of the Federal Income Tax System............................1 1. Contention: The filing of a tax return is voluntary...............................................1 2. Contention: Payment of tax is voluntary. ...........................................................3 3. Contention: Taxpayers can reduce their federal income tax liability by filing a “zero return.” .......................................................................................................6 4. Contention: The IRS must prepare federal tax returns for a person who fails to file. ......................................................................................................................8 5. Contention: Compliance with an administrative summons issued by the IRS is voluntary. ............................................................................................................9 B. The Meaning of Income: Taxable Income and Gross Income ...................11 1. Contention: Wages, tips, and other compensation received for personal services are not income. ...................................................................................11 2. Contention: Only foreign-source income is taxable. ........................................16 3. Contention: Federal Reserve Notes are not income........................................18 C. The Meaning of Certain Terms Used in the Internal Revenue