DOCSLIB.ORG

Policy Document: Peter Kershaw's Tax Approach, Form #08.010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Policy Document: Peter Kershaw's Tax Approach, Form #08.010 POLICY DOCUMENT: PETER KERSHAW’S TAX APPROACH Last revised: 1/4/2008 Policy Document: Peter Kershaw’s Tax Approach 1 of 47 Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry ,http://sedm.org Form 08.010, Rev. 1-4-2008 EXHIBIT:________ TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Rebutted version of “The Power to Tax is the Power to Destroy” ................................................. 8 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Part 1 .......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Part 2 ........................................................................................................................................................................ 21 3 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................ 42 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Constitutional Provisions 16th Amendment .............................................................................................................................................................. 20, 31 Article IV ............................................................................................................................................................................... 17 First Amendment ........................................................................................................................................................ 21, 27, 35 The Federalist, No. 46 ............................................................................................................................................................ 41 Statutes 1 U.S.C. §204 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 31 26 U.S.C. §3401(c) ................................................................................................................................................................. 10 26 U.S.C. §6331(a) ................................................................................................................................................................. 10 26 U.S.C. §7408(d) ................................................................................................................................................................ 10 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26) .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) ................................................................................................................................... 10, 12 31 U.S.C. §846 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 19 31 U.S.C. §856 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 19 4 U.S.C. §72 ........................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Federal Reserve Act ............................................................................................................................................................... 19 I.R.C. §501(c)(3) .......................................................................................................................................................... 9, 10, 11 I.R.C. §6331(A) ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15 I.R.C. §7203 ........................................................................................................................................................................... 25 I.R.C. 501(c)(3) ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Internal Revenue Code .................................................................................................................... 7, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 21 Internal Revenue Code Subtitle A .......................................................................................................................................... 29 Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-206) ..................................................... 31 Statutes At Large .................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Regulations 26 C.F.R. §1.1-1(a)(2)(ii) ........................................................................................................................................... 10, 39, 43 26 C.F.R. §301.6109-1(d)(3) ............................................................................................................................................ 39, 43 26 C.F.R. §31.3401(c)-1 ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 Cases Boyd v. State of Nebraska, 143 U.S. 135 (1892) ............................................................................................................. 38, 41 Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932 ................................................................................................................................................ 29 Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall. (U.S.) 419 (Dall.) (1793) ......................................................................................................... 40 Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. (2 Dall.) 419, 1 L.Ed 440 (1793) .............................................................................................. 40 Lewis v. U.S. 680 F.2d. 1239, No. 80-5905, 9th Circuit (1982) ............................................................................................ 19 Policy Document: Peter Kershaw’s Tax Approach 2 of 47 Copyright Sovereignty Education and Defense Ministry ,http://sedm.org Form 08.010, Rev. 1-4-2008 EXHIBIT:________ Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438, 478 (1928) ............................................................................................................ 28 Roboz v. Kennedy, 219 F.Supp. 892 (D.D.C. 1963), p. 24 .................................................................................................... 36 Sinking Fund Cases, 99 U.S. 700 (1878) ................................................................................................................................. 9 U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d. 1021, 1032 (1970) ....................................................................................................................... 29 U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d. 297, 299 (1997) .............................................................................................................................. 29 Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) ............................................................................................................................ 41 Other Authorities 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 2279, 2327 .................................................................................................................................................... 25 861 Argument ......................................................................................................................................................................... 24 ABA Task Force on Federal Tax Reform .............................................................................................................................. 16 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) ................................................................................................................................................... 16 America's Founding Fathers ................................................................................................................................................... 41 Barak ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Bryan Malatesta CPA ............................................................................................................................................................. 24 Common Sense ....................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Conflicts in a Nutshell, David D. Siegel and Patrick J. Borchers, West Publishing, p. 24 ..................................................... 36 Congressman Ron Paul .......................................................................................................................................................... 19
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY March 5, 1996 In
    * * * PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY March 5, 1996 In accordance with the Warrant the polls were opened at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m. The voters cast their ballots in their respective precincts. The results were as follows: DEMOCRATIC PARTY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE Bill Clinton 24 59 24 21 39 81 71 57 63 25 464 Lyndon N. LaRouche Jr 0 3 0 0 0 2 1 5 1 1 13 No Preference 1 1 1 0 3 2 0 5 3 1 17 All Others 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 2 11 Blanks 0 0 3 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 11 TOTAL 28 64 28 21 45 85 74 73 69 29 516 STATE COMMITTEE MAN Stanley C. Rosenberg 23 55 27 20 35 74 61 63 61 27 446 Blanks 5 9 1 1 10 11 13 10 8 2 70 TOTAL 28 64 28 21 45 85 74 73 69 29 516 STATE COMMITTEE WOMAN Mary L. Ford 22 48 22 17 29 60 56 55 52 22 383 All Others 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Blanks 6 16 6 4 16 25 18 18 17 7 133 TOTAL 28 64 28 21 45 85 74 73 69 29 516 TOWN COMMITTEE Mary Sidney Treyz 11 17 16 11 17 15 31 26 40 24 208 Florence C. Frank 10 21 16 12 19 22 28 28 45 21 222 Dolores D.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanover Annual Report FY 1996
    ~ ~"'° ~ ~ ~ t: lr) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t-..j ~ ~ ~ ;::~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ;::: ~ ~ ONEHUNDRED AND FORTY-FOURTH ANNUAL REPORT of the OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES of the TOWN OF HANOVER FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1996 In Memoriam Michael J. Ahern 1925 - 1996 Veterans' A3enl francis J. Curran 1940 - 1996 Coordinalor of Education, Technolcsical Media (?5 Libraries lianover Middle &hool Dale A. Lochiallo 1948 - 1996 Elderly &rvices Direclor Council on A3in8 Muriel L. Mdlman 1919 - 1996 Librarian John Curlis free Library Peler Q_ Melanson 1947 - 1996 Dispalcher - J\ssislanl 6upervisor Emef8ency Communicalions Cenler Edward J. Norcoll, Jr. 1912 - 1996 Veterans' A3enl Wilmot Q_ Prall 1929 - 1996 Cuslodian lianover &hool Deparlmenl 2 HANOVER JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 1971-1972 STUDENT COUNCIL TOWN OF HANOVER PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS Tenth Congressional District WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Quincy COUNCILLOR Second Councillor District KELLY A. TIMILTY, Canton STATE SENATOR ROBERTS. CREEDON, JR., Brockton STATE REPRESENTATIVE Fifth Plymouth Representative District JANET W. O'BRIEN, Hanover COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ROBERT J. STONE, Whitman JOSEPH F. McDONOUGH, Scituate PETER G. ASIAF, JR., Brockton Population - Federal Census 11,918 Town Census 12,862 4 ELECTED TOWN OFFICERS SELECTMEN Albert R. Cavanagh 1997 George H. Lewald 1998 Robert J. Nyman 1999 ASSESSORS Robert C. Shea, Chr. 1997 Juleen D. Gantly, resigned* 1998 David C. Bond 1999 *Harald D. Carlson TOWNCLERK William F. Flynn 1998 TAX COLLECTOR Joan T. Port 1998 SCHOOL COMMITTEE Frederick L. Briggs, Chr. 1997 Edward F. Mc Vinney, Vice Chr. 1997 Joseph Bellantoni 1998 John D. Guenard 1999 Michael J. Cianciola, Sec. BOARD OF HEALTH Joseph F. Casna, Jr., Chr. 1997 Leslie J. Molyneaux 1998 Jerome D.
    [Show full text]
  • Results for March 26, 1996 Primary Election
    Susan B. Aitderisoit '» County €lcrk/R«|^strar of Voters STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST AT THE PRIMARY ELECTION HELD ON MARCH 26, 1996 IN THE COUNTY OF FRESNO STATE OF CALIFORNIA CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CLERK TO RESULTS OF THE CANVASS STATE OF CALIFORNIA) )ss. County of Fresno ) I, SUSAN B ANDERSON, County Clerk/Registrar of Voters of the County of Fresno, State of California, do hereby certify that pursuant to the provisions of Section 15301 et seq of the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the vote cast in the County of Fresno, at the election held on March 26, 1996, for the Federal, State and Local Offices and Measures submitted to the vote of the voters, and that the Statement of the Vote Cast, to which this certificate is attached, shows the whole number of votes cast in the said county and in each ofthe respective precincts therein, and that the totals of the respective columns and the totals shown for the offices are full, true and correct. WniMESS my hand and Official Seal this 11th day of April, 1996. SUSAN B. ANDERSON County Clerk/Registrar of Voters N(^RMA LOGAN/ ^ Assistant Registrar of Voters FRESNO COUNTY - DIRECT PRIMARY ELECTION PAGE 1 MARCH 26. 1996 PRINTED ON 04/11/96 AT 12.09.15 FINAL REPORT OFFICIAL REPORT NUMBER 11 I PRESIDENT OEM 649/649 I PRESIDENT OEM 472/472 I U S REPRESENTATIVE OEM I VOTE FOR 1 I 19TH DIST VOTE FOR 1 I 19TH DIST VOTE FOR 1 I BILL CLINTON 49396 89.6 I BILL CLINTON 36870 89.5 I PAUL BARILE 29034 99.8 I I LYNDON H.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BIGGEST CON How the Government Is Fleecing You
    On October 8, 1974, before a joint session of the Congress, President Ford call- ed "inflation, our public enemy No. 1." Schiffs thesis is that since it's the Federal government that causes that inflation, it's the Federal government that is, in reality, "public enemy No. 1" — and blistering chapters add to this in- dictment. With irrefutable evidence and driving logic, he accuses the Federal government of converting the American economy to national socialism and turning American workers into Federal peons. With facts and figures he shows how, when, and why the Federal government: • Causes inflation • Steals more from the public in a week than the Mafia does in a year • Declared official bankruptcy three times since 1970 • Created the energy crisis • Legislates unemployment, poverty and crime • Fraudulently conceals the nation's $8 trillion public debt • Unconstitutionally enforces a fraudulently acquired power to tax income, and • Why Social Security is a gigantic fraud from which taxpayers can now legally "drop out" • Why the Federal government is nothing but a profit making* business monopoly, and • Why he has paid no.income taxes since 1973. * For those who run it. IRWIN A. SCHIFF THE BIGGEST CON How The Government Is Fleecing You Foreword by John Chamberlain jfretbom Pooktf Las Vegas, Nevada Illustrations and Graphs by Emanuel Zeid Cover by Danial Brown Copyright 1976, 1977 by Irwin A. Schiff All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher except by a reviewer who may quote brief passages in connection with a review. Manufactured In the United States of America ISBN 0-930374-01-0 PRINTING HISTORY Arlington House Edition - Published April, 1976 Freedom Books Edition - Published August, 1977 Freedoms Book.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation Start Here
    Taxation TAXATION DISCUSSION HOME SEARCH SUBJECT INDEX ABOUT US HELP FORUMS SOVEREIGNTY EDUCATION SEDM Website Bookstore START HERE Federal Response Letters (Path to Freedom) State Tax Response Letters Tax Fraud Prevention Manual, Form #06.008 Liberty University TABLE OF CONTENTS: Civil Court Remedies for Sovereigns: Taxation, 1. DISCUSSION FORUMS Litigation Tool #10.002 2. SUBJECT INDEX Responding to a Criminal Tax Indictment, Litigation 3. ACTIVISM AND IMPORTANT EVENTS Tool #10.004 4. NEWS Master File (IMF) Decoder 5. EVIDENCE OF A MASSIVE HOAX Software Liberty Library CD, Form 6. GOVERNMENT AND LEGAL PROFESSION DECEPTION AND PROPAGANDA #11.102 6.1 Mind and thought control and censorship Family Guardian Website 6.2 Rebutted Government Propaganda DVD, Form #11.103 6.3 Legal Profession and Media Propaganda Legal Research DVD, Form #11.201 6.4 Unrebutted Government Propaganda Highlights of American 7. CITIZENSHIP Legal and Political History 7.1 Remedies CD, Form #11.202 Nontaxpayer's Audit 7.2 Legal Research Defense Manual, Form 7.3 Articles #06.011 7.4 Government citizenship resources What to Do When the IRS Comes Knocking, Form 7.5 Christian Citizenship #09.002 (OFFSITE LINK)- 8. ARTICLES/MEDIA How to respond when IRS 8.1 General Articles investigates you Secrets of the Legal 8.2 Christian Tax Articles Industry Book, Litigation 8.3 Tax Profession Corruption Tool #10.003 8.4 IRS Corruption Tax Deposition CD, Form #11.301 9. REMEDIES What Happened to Justice? 9.1 Start your Path to Freedom Here Book, Form #06.012 9.2 General Remedies SSN Policy Manual, Form 9.3 Administrative Remedies #06.013 Sovereignty Forms and 9.4 Legal Remedies Instructions Manual, Form 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Deposition Questions: 8. Courts Are Closed
    TAX DEPOSITION QUESTIONS: 8. COURTS ARE CLOSED TAX DEPOSITION QUESTIONS: 8. COURTS ARE CLOSED 8. COURTS ARE CLOSED Introduction The Courts act in collusion with the Executive and the Legislative to perpetrate the income tax fraud and deny the Constitutional protections of Due Process and Separation of Powers. Findings and Conclusions With the following series of questions, we will demonstrate that the federal courts are involved in a conspiracy to protect and uphold the federal income tax, in violation of the laws of the United States, the U.S. Constitution, and that these acts amount to Treason against the sovereign People described in Article III of the Constitution and punishable by execution. We will also show that: ● Even for crimes where the punishment includes incarceration, tax defendants are routinely denied the right to present defenses based on the Constitution. ● The Courts act in collusion with the Executive and the Legislative to perpetrate the income tax fraud. Section Summary Witnesses: ● Irwin Schiff (National Tax Expert) ● Joseph Banister (Ex. IRS Criminal Investigator) ● John Turner (Ex. IRS Collection) Transcript Acrobat version of this section including questions and evidence (large: 5.99 Mbytes) Further Study On Our Website: ● What Happened to Justice: Why There's No Justice in Federal Court and What to Do About It (OFFSITE LINK) - SEDM ● Arguments Against Nonpublication of Court Rulings ● Authorities on Jurisdiction of Federal Courts ● Conflict of Interest Convictions-Antishyster News Magazine, Vol. 8, No. 1 ● Do Judges Lie? ● Great IRS Hoax book: ❍ Section 1: Introduction ❍ Chapter 6: History of Federal Government Income Tax Fraud, Racketeering, and Extortion in the U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Schiff's Pill-Gram!
    PETER SCHIFF’S PILL-GRAM! A Spook Inside Euro-Pacific Capital! Presented August 2017 by Charles Savoie (Historical PM Research & Pilgrims Society Research) This is not about a copper gram; it’s about a flim-flam scam PILL-GRAM with an untrustworthy program! Members of secret societies in the financial system should give us all a caution! Peter Schiff of Euro-Pacific Capital has a real live PLANT in his organization! If you never heard of The Pilgrims Society before, just Google it. I’m singly responsible for most of the web content, which is why they hate my guts! I have trespassed their secrecy while they had everybody distracted by Bilderberg and Skull & Bones! As noted last time out in “PILL-GRAMS Scamming TV Gold Consumers,” I was fortunate to recently obtain a 2014 roster where for years I was stuck with a 1980 roster. This was a major breakthrough, because while Bilderberg releases lists, this one does not---unless you’re a member. This is the Money Trust personified, of the Old World and the New World, and hovering over the financiers I was forced to realize are the British Royal family. They rank the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and all other financier dynasties. They decide who will be admitted, who won’t be, and occasionally, who will be expelled as in the case of Jewish financier Sir Edgar Speyer, in The Pilgrims London 1914 but removed and absent from the 1924 list. In December 1921 King George V of England, head of The Pilgrims Society, also removed Speyer from the Privy Council, which has always been publicly visible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments November 30, 2007 I
    THE TRUTH ABOUT FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS NOVEMBER 30, 2007 I. FRIVOLOUS TAX ARGUMENTS IN GENERAL .............................................1 A. The Voluntary Nature of the Federal Income Tax System............................1 1. Contention: The filing of a tax return is voluntary...............................................1 2. Contention: Payment of tax is voluntary. ...........................................................3 3. Contention: Taxpayers can reduce their federal income tax liability by filing a “zero return.” .......................................................................................................6 4. Contention: The IRS must prepare federal tax returns for a person who fails to file. ......................................................................................................................8 5. Contention: Compliance with an administrative summons issued by the IRS is voluntary. ............................................................................................................9 B. The Meaning of Income: Taxable Income and Gross Income ...................11 1. Contention: Wages, tips, and other compensation received for personal services are not income. ...................................................................................11 2. Contention: Only foreign-source income is taxable. ........................................16 3. Contention: Federal Reserve Notes are not income........................................18 C. The Meaning of Certain Terms Used in the Internal Revenue
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Willfulness As It Applies to the Body of American Criminal Tax Law
    MINNS_FINAL 12/27/2007 11:37 AM A BRIEF HISTORY OF WILLFULNESS AS IT APPLIES TO THE BODY OF AMERICAN CRIMINAL TAX LAW * MICHAEL LOUIS MINNS An article describing the history of the willfulness requirement in criminal tax law, with a goal of demonstrating that willfulness is an important legal standard. I. WILLFULNESS IN WESTERN LAW .............................................. 396 II. MODERN U.S. CRIMINAL TAX LAW—HOW IS WILLFULNESS PROVEN?............................................................. 402 III. WILLFULNESS AND THE TAX PROTESTOR............................... 408 IV. PROOF OF THE DEFENDANT’S WILLFULNESS— SUBJECTIVE OR OBJECTIVE?..................................................... 415 V. CHEEK V. UNITED STATES ......................................................... 418 VI. POST-CHEEK TWEAKING—SHOW AND TELL, OR TELL ONLY? ........................................................................................... 422 VII. WILLFULNESS IN THE 21ST CENTURY....................................... 428 VIII. SHIP TAX PROTESTORS’ FATE UNDER CHEEK AND ITS PROGENY...................................................................................... 429 IX. CONCLUSION ................................................................................ 431 “Congress did not intend that a person, by reason of a bona fide misunderstanding as to his liability for the tax, as to his duty to make a return, or as to the adequacy of the records . , should become a criminal by his mere failure to measure up to the prescribed standard of conduct.”1
    [Show full text]
  • TAX DEPOSITION QUESTIONS: 13. 26 U.S.C. 6020(B) SUBSTITUTE for RETURNS
    TAX DEPOSITION QUESTIONS: 13. 26 U.S.C. 6020(b) SUBSTITUTE FOR RETURNS TAX DEPOSITION QUESTIONS: 13. 26 U.S.C. 6020(b): SUBSTITUTE FOR RETURNS 13. 26 U.S.C. 6020(b): SUBSTITUTE FOR RETURNS Introduction Ex-IRS agents testify about agent training courses conducted by IRS that fraudulently and deceptively train them to create "Substitute Returns" under 26 USC 6020(b). There is NO legal authority for IRS agents to create "Substitute Returns" for American citizens who choose not to file a individual Form 1040. "Substitute Returns" become the vehicle of IRS fraud for unlawful tax assessments, fraudulent penalties and even criminal prosecution by DOJ. Findings and Conclusions With the following series of questions, we intend to prove that when an American stands up for his rights by choosing not to file tax returns, the IRS has to violate the law and produce a fraudulent assessment to create a liability. ● The IRS has NO legal authority to create a "substitute return" for a citizen who chooses not file an individual income tax return. ● Without a signed tax return from a citizen, no individual income tax may be legally "assessed" against a citizen by an IRS agent. ● 26 U.S.C. Section 6020(b) "Substitute Returns" is NOT applicable to individual income taxes – only business related taxes. ● IRS has propagated the tax fraud by willfully utilizing deceptive training methods and materials for their agents. ● Although there is no legal authority, IRS Agents are fraudulently trained by the IRS to create "Substitute Returns" for individual income taxes. Substitute Returns are used routinely in the normal course of an agent’s workload.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Reports of the Town Officers Of
    330th ANNUAL REPORT MENDON, MASSACHUSETTS 1996 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2017 with funding from Boston Public Library https://archive.org/details/annualreportsoft1996mend ANNUAL REPORT of the TOWN OFFICERS of MENDON, MASSACHUSETTS including the report of the SCHOOL COMMITTEE FOR THE Financial Year July 1,1995 - June 30,1996 Calendar Year January 1, 1996 - December 31,1996 Town of Mendon Board of Selectmen Proclamation UA Proclamation Honoring The Senior Citizens Of Mendon ” Whereas Elders age sixty and over constitute eighteen percent of the total population of Massachusetts; with 1,080,000 being sixty years or older; 567,000 being seventy years or older; and 200,000 being eighty years or older, and, Whereas Through the richness or their experience, the depth of their wisdom, the variety of their talents and the strength of their commitment, Massachusetts elders have helped build our communities, the Commonwealth, and this nation, and, Whereas As we face continuing social and economic challenges, the example set by Massachusetts elders encourages all citizens to search for solutions and pursue opportunities that will improve themselves and their communities, and, Whereas The Commonwealth’s commitment to safeguard the independence and dignity of all elders is demonstrated through the Massachusetts Executive Office of Elder Affairs, and its network of 345 municipal Councils on Aging, 27 Home Care Corporations, 23 Area Agencies on Aging, and 290 Senior Centers, and, Whereas Elders are worth of and deserve respect from people of all ages, now therefore, Be It Proclaimed by the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Mendon that Sunday, September 15 1996 be declared MENDON SENIOR CITIZEN DAY.
    [Show full text]
  • 1992 Journal
    OCTOBER TERM, 1992 Reference Index Contents: page Statistics n General in Appeals in Arguments iv Attorneys iv Briefs iv Certiorari iv Costs v Judgments, Mandates and Opinions v Original Cases v Parties vi Records vi Rules vi Stays vii Conclusion vii (i) II STATISTICS AS OF JUNE 28, 1993 In Forma Paid Original Pauperis Total Cases Cases Number of cases on docket 12 2,441 4,792 7,245 Cases disposed of......... 1 2,099 4,256 6,366 Remaining on docket 11 342 536 889 Cases docketed during term: Paid cases 2,062 In forma pauperis cases 4,240 Original cases...... 1 Total.. 6,303 Cases remaining from last term 942 Total cases on docket 7,245 Cases disposed of 6,366 Number remaining on docket 889 Petitions for certiorari granted: In paid cases 79 In in forma pauperis cases 14 Appeals granted: In paid cases ., 4 In in forma pauperis cases 0 Total cases granted plenary review 97 Cases argued during term 116 Number disposed of by full opinions Ill Number disposed of by per curiam opinions 4 Number set for reargument next term 0 Cases available for argument at beginning of term 66 Disposed of summarily after review was granted 4 Original cases set for argument 3 Cases reviewed and decided without oral argument 109 Total cases available for argument at start of next term 46 Number of written opinions of the Court 107 Per curiam opinions in argued cases 4 Number of lawyers admitted to practice as of June 28, 1993: On written motion 2,775 On oral motion 1,345 Total 4,120 Ill GENERAL: page 1991 Term closed and 1992 Term convened October 5, 1992; adjourned October 4, 1993 1 Allotment order of Justices entered 972 Bryson, William C, named Acting Solicitor General Janu- ary 20, 1993; presents Attorney General Janet Reno; re- marks by the Chief Justice 619, 865 Clinton, President, attends investiture of Justice Ginsburg 971 Court adjourned to attend Inauguration of President Clin- ton January 20, 1993 425 Court closed December 24, 1992, by order of Chief Justice Days, Drew S., Solicitor General, presented to the Court.
    [Show full text]