Plasticity of the Phonotactic Selectiveness of Four Species of Chirping Crickets (Gryllidae): Implications for Call Recognition Benjamin Navia
Andrews University From the SelectedWorks of Benjamin Navia Winter January 5, 2010 Plasticity of the phonotactic selectiveness of four species of chirping crickets (Gryllidae): Implications for call recognition Benjamin Navia Available at: https://works.bepress.com/benjamin-navia/14/ Physiological Entomology (2010) 35, 99–116 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2009.00713.x Plasticity of the phonotactic selectiveness of four species of chirping crickets (Gryllidae): Implications for call recognition JOHN STOUT1, BENJAMIN NAVIA2, JASON JEFFERY1, LESLIE SAMUEL1, LAURA HARTWIG1, ASHLEY BUTLIN1, MARY CHUNG1, JESSICA WILSON1, ERICA DASHNER1 andGORDON ATKINS1 1Biology Department, Andrews University Berrien Springs, Michigan, U.S.A. and 2Department of Human Biology, Kettering College of Medical Arts, Kettering, Ohio, U.S.A. Abstract. Earlier studies of phonotaxis by female crickets describe this selective behavioural response as being important in the females’ choices of conspecific males, leading to reproduction. In the present study, moderate (30+) to very large data sets of phonotactic behaviour by female Acheta domesticus L., Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer, Gryllus pennsylvanicus Burmeister and Gryllus veletis Alexander demonstrate substantially greater plasticity in the behavioural choices, as made by females of each species, for the syllable periods (SP) of model calling songs (CS) than has been previously described. Phonotactic choices by each species range from the very selective (i.e. responding to only one or two SPs) to very unselective (i.e. responding to all SPs presented). Some females that do not respond to all SPs prefer a range that includes either the longest or shortest SP tested, which fall outside the range of SPs produced by conspecific males.
[Show full text]