DOCSLIB.ORG

The Blue Bill 2012 Number 4 December

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Blue Bill Quarterly Journal of the Kingston Field Naturalists ISSN 0382-5655 Volume 59, No. 4 December 2012 Contents President’s Page Gaye Beckwith ...................239 Kingston Area Birds Autumn Season 1Aug-30Nov 2012 Mark Andrew Conboy .......240 Kingston Butterfly Summary 2012 John Poland .......................244 Coffee & Conservation Shirley E. French ...............249 Fall Round-up 2012 Nov03-04 Ron D. Weir ......................251 Frontenac’s Gibson Lake Loop: A Must to Hike Terry Sprague ....................255 Odonate Sightings & Yearly List 2012 Kurt Hennige ....................257 KFN Outings Sep-Nov 2012 Jaansalu, Grooms ..................... Robertson, Benderavage ....260 Salamanders of the Kingston Region Matt Ellerbeck ...................265 Local Conservation Concerns Shirley E. French ...............266 Orthoptera in the Kingston Area Paul Mackenzie .................268 Checklist of Orthoptera for the Kingston Area Paul Mackenzie .................278 2012/2013 Officers The Blue Bill is the quarterly journal (published President: Gaye Beckwith March, June, September and December) of the Kingston Field Naturalists, P.O. Box 831, Kingston, 613-376-3716 ON (Canada), K7L 4X6. [email protected] Website: http://www.kingstonfieldnaturalists.org Honorary President vacant Send submissions to the Editor by the 15th of the month prior to the month of publication (i.e. by the 15th of February/May/August/November) to the address above, or to the editor via e-mail to: [email protected] Please include contact phone number. Vice-President: Mark Conboy Submissions should be in MS Word format or in “plain text” format (PC or MacIntosh) or unformatted in the body of an e-mail. [email protected] Canadian Publications Mail Product Sales Agreement Past President: Janis Grant #047128 613-548-3668 [email protected] Treasurer: Larry McCurdy 613-389-6427 [email protected] Recording John Cartwright Secretary: 613-766-2896 [email protected] Membership John Critchley Secretary: 613-634-5475 [email protected] Nature Reserves Erwin Batalla 613-542-2048 [email protected] Conservation Chris Hargreaves 613-389-8993 [email protected] Blue Bill Editor Alex Simmons 613-542-2048 [email protected] Junior Naturalists Anne Robertson 613-389-6742 [email protected] Education Shirley French 613-548-8617 [email protected] Field Trips Kurt Hennige 613-386-1772 [email protected] Bird Sightings Mark Conboy [email protected] Bird Records Ron Weir 613-549-5274 [email protected] Speakers Gaye Beckwith 613-376-3716 [email protected] Newsletter Connie Gardiner 613-545-2354 [email protected] Publicity/Website Chris Grooms 613-386-7969 [email protected] Slideshow Gaye Beckwith 613-376-3716 [email protected] Ontario Nature Janis Grant 613-548-3668 [email protected] Member-at-large Darren Rayner 613-766-2210 [email protected]. Member-at-large Ken Robinson [email protected] Member-at-large Rose-marie Burke 613-549-7583 [email protected] Archives Peter McIntyre 613-548-4738 [email protected] The Blue Bill Volume 59, No. 4 Page 239 President’s Page Gaye Beckwith In September the KFN executive offered working for environmental members an opportunity to give causes suggestions pertaining to the operation birding trips and information on of the club. A survey with 9 questions rare or good birds in the area was distributed in the newsletter and an electronic version was made available on the KFN website. Eighteen responses have been received: 12 via the website and 6 on paper. Below is a summary of the key points of the respondents. Members were asked to indicate the number of years they have been with the KFN and their age category. We had a wide distribution in both of these questions from new members to over 40 years and from young to old. the diversity of interests of members Interests was the next category surveyed. appeal to youth To no one’s surprise, an interest in Birds the depth of knowledge within was listed by 82% of the respondents. the club Our club, during its six-plus decades of reading about the club's existence, has had a strong enthusiasm activities for birding and been a provincial leader a good healthy membership for the protection of bird species. A knowledgeable group of people significant percentage of members chose willing to teach and share Conservation, and Butterflies/Insects as information high on their interest list. Field Trips, strong support for local land Rambles and Hiking remain an important conservation initiatives (e.g. aspect of the club, with Astronomy, acquisition & monitoring) Botany, Geology, and Aquatic Life also no pressure to participate selected. Some indicated that our Educational Workshops are important. We also received a variety of suggestions which will be considered by Respondents were positive towards the executive and implemented where what the KFN is presently offering: applicable: high quality of speakers, some more social interaction at the with challenging content meetings to ensure everyone camaraderie with people from feels welcome many walks of life Page 240 December 2012 project voices in meetings to examples of club activities which need ensure everyone hears questions volunteers to make them successful. and answers occasional trips further afield Hopefully the responses are attract more young members via representative of members’ feelings. The social media (Facebook, Twitter, executive appreciates the positive Blog etc.) feedback, a salute to the many people a succession plan for our junior who have built this club during the past and teen program six decades. It’s up to the current and help new members “break into” future executives to continue with the the group ‘good things’ and to improve in the more events geared to working areas that we can. At our last general people, (evenings, summer) meeting, we stressed welcoming people more information re natural and will strive to ensure that we are history and about invertebrates inclusive with all members. and other lesser-known species a permanent location to house Perhaps the greatest impact the club will club records, and materials see in the future is the continued use of fund-raising using the website. technology to support us. Bird records are now being added to eBird on the Results indicated a willingness from internet, allowing the world to see members to contribute their expertise to what’s being seen in the Kingston the club by leading outdoor sessions, Region. At a recent executive meeting, presenting at a monthly meeting or several members used smart phones writing an article for the Blue Bill. and tablets to look up information to Others are willing to sit on the answer or clarify queries. executive, help with research and conservation committees and to help Thank you to those members who filled when needed. The Short-Eared Owl out the survey. You have given your Survey, the Bioblitz, membership executive much ‘food for thought’, activities, Youth program, refreshments which will help keep the KFN a vibrant at meetings, clean-ups, bird roundups and significant organization. and Christmas Bird Counts are Kingston Region Birds Autumn Season 1Aug to 30Nov 2012 Mark Andrew Conboy The most exciting birding this autumn species, but nothing like was seen came in late October and early elsewhere on Lake Ontario and Lake November as Hurricane Sandy sent a Erie. Winter finches began to move into host of interesting birds to the Great our region from the north and Cave Lakes region. Observers in our region Swallows appeared from the south. were lucky enough to locate a few good The Blue Bill Volume 59, No. 4 Page 241 Here are the highlights from the autumn Biological Stn. (Conboy) 7-9Sep; 4 at season. Chaffey’s Lock Rd. (Conboy) 12Nov. Snow Goose: Highest count and first Upland Sandpiper: 2 at Amherst Isl. migrants were 5 at Bath (O’Toole) 6Oct. (North Leeds Birders) 3Aug. The latest migrant was 1 at Bath (Hennige) 6Nov. The only other sighting Ruddy Turnstone: 2 at Amherst Isl. was 1 at Wolfe Isl. (Hennige) 2Nov. (North Leeds Birders) 3Aug; 4 at Salmon Isl. (Mackenzie) 8Aug. Brant: The only observations were of 450 off Patterson Park in Kingston White-rumped Sandpiper: A fairly late (Martin) 30Oct and 6 off the El Dorado migrant was 1 at Amherst Isl. (O’Toole) Beach Preserve (Shrimpton) 2Nov. 24Nov. Trumpeter Swan: Widespread sightings Baird’s Sandpiper: A handful of records from north of the city and the islands from Amherst Isl. and the Amherstview beginning 17Oct (Conboy), except for Sewage Lagoons (KFN) 30Aug-13Sep. one injured bird which over-summered on Lake Opinicon (Conboy). The highest Purple Sandpiper: 3 at Wolfe Isl. count was 13 at Charleston Lake (Martin) 1Nov. Provincial Park (Robinson) 14Nov. Red-necked Phalarope: 1 at Tundra Swan: Highest count was 120 at Amherstview Sewage Lagoons Prince Edward Pt. (Keen) 16Nov. The (Mackenzie) 28Aug. first migrants were 10 at Amherst Isl. (Grooms & Hennige) 3Nov. Red Phalarope: 1 at Bath (Hennige) 13Oct. American Black Duck/Mallard Hybrid: 1 at Patterson Park (Martin) 30Oct. Black-legged Kittiwake: 1 at Wolfe Isl. (Martin); 1 at Bath (Hennige) 6Nov Canvasback: 3 at Wolfe Isl. (Hennige) 27Oct. Little Gull: 1 at Prince Edward Pt. (Hennige) 16Nov; 1 near Waupoos Red-throated Loon: 1 at Prince Edward (Hoar) 18Nov. Pt. (Vandermeulen) 19Nov. Iceland Gull: 1 at Bath (Hennige) 6Nov. Golden Eagle: 1 at Henderson Bay (Shrimpton) 2Nov; 1 at Amherst Isl. Lesser Black-backed Gull: 1 at Amherst (Hennige) 19Nov. Isl. (Conboy) 28Aug. Sandhill Crane: 2 near Elgin (Burns) Glaucous Gull: 1 at Amherst Isl. 10Aug; 1 at Queen’s University (Grooms & Hennige) 3Nov. Page 242 December 2012 Jaeger sp.: 1 at Amherst Isl. (Hennige) Common Redpoll: widespread 29Oct. observations 4Nov onward (KFN). Red-headed Woodpecker: 1 at Prince Hoary Redpoll: 1 at Amherstview Edward Pt. (Blancher) 16Sep. Sewage Lagoons (Hennige) 15Nov. Olive-sided Flycatcher: 1 at Prince Evening Grosbeak: widespread Edward Pt.
Recommended publications

  • The Acridiidae of Minnesota

    Wqt 1lluitttr11ity nf :!alliuur11nta AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION BULLETIN 141 TECHNICAL THE ACRIDIIDAE OF MINNESOTA BY M. P. SOMES DIVISION OF ENTOMOLOGY UNIVERSITY FARM, ST. PAUL. JULY 1914 THE UNIVERSlTY OF l\ll.'\1\ESOTA THE 130ARD OF REGENTS The Hon. B. F. :.JELsox, '\finneapolis, President of the Board - 1916 GEORGE EDGAR VINCENT, Minneapolis Ex Officio The President of the l.:niversity The Hon. ADOLPH 0. EBERHART, Mankato Ex Officio The Governor of the State The Hon. C. G. ScnuLZ, St. Paul l'.x Oflicio The Superintendent of Education The Hon. A. E. RICE, \Villmar 191.3 The Hon. CH.\RLES L. Sol\DfERS, St. Paul - 1915 The Hon. PIERCE Bun.ER, St. Paul 1916 The Hon. FRED B. SNYDER, Minneapolis 1916 The Hon. W. J. J\Lwo, Rochester 1919 The Hon. MILTON M. \NILLIAMS, Little Falls 1919 The Hon. }OIIN G. vVILLIAMS, Duluth 1920 The Hon. GEORGE H. PARTRIDGE, Minneapolis 1920 Tl-IE AGRICULTURAL C0:\1MITTEE The Hon. A. E. RrCE, Chairman The Hon. MILTON M. vVILLIAMS The Hon. C. G. SCHULZ President GEORGE E. VINCENT The Hon. JoHN G. \VrLLIAMS STATION STAFF A. F. VlooDs, M.A., D.Agr., Director J. 0. RANKIN, M.A.. Editor HARRIET 'vV. SEWALL, B.A., Librarian T. J. HORTON, Photographer T. L.' HAECKER, Dairy and Animal Husbandman M. H. REYNOLDS, B.S.A., M.D., D.V.:'d., Veterinarian ANDREW Boss, Agriculturist F. L. WASHBURN, M.A., Entomologist E. M. FREEMAN, Ph.D., Plant Pathologist and Botanist JonN T. STEWART, C.E., Agricultural Engineer R. W. THATCHER, M.A., Agricultural Chemist F. J.
  • Spatial Vision in Band-Winged Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Oedipodinae)

    Spatial Vision in Band-Winged Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Oedipodinae)

    Spatial vision in band-winged grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Oedipodinae) A Senior Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of Organismal Biology and Ecology, Colorado College By Alexander B. Duncan Bachelor of Arts Degree in Organismal Biology and Ecology May, 2017 Approved by: _________________________________________ Dr. Nicholas Brandley Primary Thesis Advisor ________________________________________ Dr. Emilie Gray Secondary Thesis Advisor ABSTRACT Visual acuity, the ability to resolve fine spatial details, can vary dramatically between and within insect species. Body-size, sex, behavior, and ecological niche are all factors that may influence an insect’s acuity. Band-winged grasshoppers (Oedipodinae) are a subfamily of grasshoppers characterized by their colorfully patterned hindwings. Although researchers have anecdotally suggested that this color pattern may attract mates, few studies have examined the visual acuity of these animals, and none have examined its implications on intraspecific signaling. Here, we compare the visual acuity of three bandwing species: Dissosteira carolina, Arphia pseudonietana, and Spharagemon equale. To measure acuity in these species we used a modified radius of curvature estimation (RCE) technique. Visual acuity was significantly coarser 1) in males compared to females, 2) parallel to the horizon compared to the perpendicular, and 3) in S. equale compared to other bandwings. Unlike many insect families, body size within a species did not correlate with visual acuity. To examine the functional implications of these results, we modeled the appearance of different bandwing patterns to conspecifics. These results suggest that hind- wing patterning could only be used as a signal to conspecifics at short distances (<50cm). This study furthers the exploration of behavior and the evolution of visual systems in bandwings.
  • Dragonflies (Odonata) of the Northwest Territories Status Ranking And

    Dragonflies (Odonata) of the Northwest Territories Status Ranking And

    DRAGONFLIES (ODONATA) OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES STATUS RANKING AND PRELIMINARY ATLAS PAUL M. CATLING University of Ottawa 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................3 Acknowledgements ...........................................................3 Methods ....................................................................3 The database .................................................................4 History .....................................................................5 Rejected taxa ................................................................5 Possible additions ............................................................5 Additional field inventory ......................................................7 Collection an Inventory of dragonflies .............................................8 Literature Cited .............................................................10 Appendix Table 1 - checklist ...................................................13 Appendix Table 2 - Atlas and ranking notes .......................................15 2 ABSTRACT: occurrences was provided by Dr. Rex Thirty-five species of Odonata are given Kenner, Dr. Donna Giberson, Dr. Nick status ranks in the Northwest Territories Donnelly and Dr. Robert Cannings (some based on number of occurrences and details provided below). General distributional area within the territory. Nine information on contacts and locations of species are ranked as S2, may be at risk, collections provided by Dr. Cannings
  • Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site a Report to the U

    Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site a Report to the U

    Invertebrate Distribution and Diversity Assessment at the U. S. Army Pinon Canyon Maneuver Site A report to the U. S. Army and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service G. J. Michels, Jr., J. L. Newton, H. L. Lindon, and J. A. Brazille Texas AgriLife Research 2301 Experiment Station Road Bushland, TX 79012 2008 Report Introductory Notes The invertebrate survey in 2008 presented an interesting challenge. Extremely dry conditions prevailed throughout most of the adult activity period for the invertebrates and grass fires occurred several times throughout the summer. By visual assessment, plant resources were scarce compared to last year, with few green plants and almost no flowering plants. Eight habitats and nine sites continued to be sampled in 2008. The Ponderosa pine/ yellow indiangrass site was removed from the study after the low numbers of species and individuals collected there in 2007. All other sites from the 2007 survey were included in the 2008 survey. We also discontinued the collection of Coccinellidae in the 2008 survey, as only 98 individuals from four species were collected in 2007. Pitfall and malaise trapping were continued in the same way as the 2007 survey. Sweep net sampling was discontinued to allow time for Asilidae and Orthoptera timed surveys consisting of direct collection of individuals with a net. These surveys were conducted in the same way as the time constrained butterfly (Papilionidea and Hesperoidea) surveys, with 15-minute intervals for each taxanomic group. This was sucessful when individuals were present, but the dry summer made it difficult to assess the utility of these techniques because of overall low abundance of insects.
  • 197 Section 9 Sunflower (Helianthus

    197 Section 9 Sunflower (Helianthus

    SECTION 9 SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.) 1. Taxonomy of the Genus Helianthus, Natural Habitat and Origins of the Cultivated Sunflower A. Taxonomy of the genus Helianthus The sunflower belongs to the genus Helianthus in the Composite family (Asterales order), which includes species with very diverse morphologies (herbs, shrubs, lianas, etc.). The genus Helianthus belongs to the Heliantheae tribe. This includes approximately 50 species originating in North and Central America. The basis for the botanical classification of the genus Helianthus was proposed by Heiser et al. (1969) and refined subsequently using new phenological, cladistic and biosystematic methods, (Robinson, 1979; Anashchenko, 1974, 1979; Schilling and Heiser, 1981) or molecular markers (Sossey-Alaoui et al., 1998). This approach splits Helianthus into four sections: Helianthus, Agrestes, Ciliares and Atrorubens. This classification is set out in Table 1.18. Section Helianthus This section comprises 12 species, including H. annuus, the cultivated sunflower. These species, which are diploid (2n = 34), are interfertile and annual in almost all cases. For the majority, the natural distribution is central and western North America. They are generally well adapted to dry or even arid areas and sandy soils. The widespread H. annuus L. species includes (Heiser et al., 1969) plants cultivated for seed or fodder referred to as H. annuus var. macrocarpus (D.C), or cultivated for ornament (H. annuus subsp. annuus), and uncultivated wild and weedy plants (H. annuus subsp. lenticularis, H. annuus subsp. Texanus, etc.). Leaves of these species are usually alternate, ovoid and with a long petiole. Flower heads, or capitula, consist of tubular and ligulate florets, which may be deep purple, red or yellow.
  • Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R

    Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R

    Ecography ECOG-02578 Pinkert, S., Brandl, R. and Zeuss, D. 2016. Colour lightness of dragonfly assemblages across North America and Europe. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.02578 Supplementary material Appendix 1 Figures A1–A12, Table A1 and A2 1 Figure A1. Scatterplots between female and male colour lightness of 44 North American (Needham et al. 2000) and 19 European (Askew 1988) dragonfly species. Note that colour lightness of females and males is highly correlated. 2 Figure A2. Correlation of the average colour lightness of European dragonfly species illustrated in both Askew (1988) and Dijkstra and Lewington (2006). Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Note that the extracted colour values of dorsal dragonfly drawings from both sources are highly correlated. 3 Figure A3. Frequency distribution of the average colour lightness of 152 North American and 74 European dragonfly species. Average colour lightness ranges from 0 (absolute black) to 255 (pure white). Rugs at the abscissa indicate the value of each species. Note that colour values are from different sources (North America: Needham et al. 2000, Europe: Askew 1988), and hence absolute values are not directly comparable. 4 Figure A4. Scatterplots of single ordinary least-squares regressions between average colour lightness of 8,127 North American dragonfly assemblages and mean temperature of the warmest quarter. Red dots represent assemblages that were excluded from the analysis because they contained less than five species. Note that those assemblages that were excluded scatter more than those with more than five species (c.f. the coefficients of determination) due to the inherent effect of very low sampling sizes.
  • The Value of Urban Ponds for Odonata and Plant Biodiversity

    The Value of Urban Ponds for Odonata and Plant Biodiversity

    The Value of Urban Ponds for Odonata and Plant Biodiversity Mary Ann Perron Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies and Research University of Ottawa In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) degree in the Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5 Thèse soumise à l’École des Études Supérieures et de la Recherche Université d’Ottawa En vue de l’obtention du diplôme de doctorat (Ph.D.) au Département de Biologie, Université d’Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5 Mary Ann Perron, Ottawa, Canada, 2020 I dedicate this thesis to my father, Jules Perron, who is my biggest inspiration. I love you dad. ii Abstract Urbanization involves the conversion of natural areas to impervious surfaces, which can lead to an increase in the frequency and severity of flood events in cities. To mitigate flood risk, stormwater ponds are constructed to manage urban runoff. Stormwater ponds can also be colonized by wildlife, but their suitability as habitat is disputed due to potential toxicological risks. This study assessed the suitability of stormwater ponds as habitat for the bioindicators Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) and determined environmental factors that impact their community structure. Odonata (adults, nymphs and exuviae) were sampled at 41 stormwater ponds and 10 natural reference ponds across the National Capital Region of Canada, with a subset of ponds sampled over four years (2015-2018). Plant communities, water quality and surrounding land cover were analyzed at each pond to determine their impacts on Odonata community structure. Overall, stormwater ponds had lower Odonata abundance and a greater variation in species richness and community structure compared to natural ponds but had comparable dragonfly reproduction rates.
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata

    A Checklist of North American Odonata

    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009. Copyright © 2009 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 edition published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Tramea carolina (Carolina Saddlebags), Cabin Lake, Aiken Co., South Carolina, 13 May 2008, Dennis Paulson. 1 1724 NE 98 Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 457 species of North American Odonata considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approxi- mate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION Before the first edition of this checklist there was no re- Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, cent checklist of North American Odonata. Muttkows- with number of species. ki (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Zygoptera and Anisoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Westfall and May (2006) and Needham, West- fall, and May (2000), respectively, but some changes Calopterygidae 2 8 in nomenclature have been made subsequently. Davies Lestidae 2 19 and Tobin (1984, 1985) listed the world odonate fauna Coenagrionidae 15 103 but did not include type localities or details of distri- Platystictidae 1 1 bution.
  • 2010 Animal Species of Concern

    2010 Animal Species of Concern

    MONTANA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Animal Species of Concern Species List Last Updated 08/05/2010 219 Species of Concern 86 Potential Species of Concern All Records (no filtering) A program of the University of Montana and Natural Resource Information Systems, Montana State Library Introduction The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) serves as the state's information source for animals, plants, and plant communities with a focus on species and communities that are rare, threatened, and/or have declining trends and as a result are at risk or potentially at risk of extirpation in Montana. This report on Montana Animal Species of Concern is produced jointly by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Montana Animal Species of Concern are native Montana animals that are considered to be "at risk" due to declining population trends, threats to their habitats, and/or restricted distribution. Also included in this report are Potential Animal Species of Concern -- animals for which current, often limited, information suggests potential vulnerability or for which additional data are needed before an accurate status assessment can be made. Over the last 200 years, 5 species with historic breeding ranges in Montana have been extirpated from the state; Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido), Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), Pilose Crayfish (Pacifastacus gambelii), and Rocky Mountain Locust (Melanoplus spretus). Designation as a Montana Animal Species of Concern or Potential Animal Species of Concern is not a statutory or regulatory classification. Instead, these designations provide a basis for resource managers and decision-makers to make proactive decisions regarding species conservation and data collection priorities in order to avoid additional extirpations.
  • The Taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera

    The Taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera

    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 14 Number 3 – Number 4 Article 1 12-30-1954 The taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera Andrew H. Barnum Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Barnum, Andrew H. (1954) "The taxonomy of Utah Orthoptera," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 14 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol14/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. IMUS.COMP.ZSOL iU6 1 195^ The Great Basin Naturalist harvard Published by the HWIilIijM i Department of Zoology and Entomology Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Volum e XIV DECEMBER 30, 1954 Nos. 3 & 4 THE TAXONOMY OF UTAH ORTHOPTERA^ ANDREW H. BARNUM- Grand Junction, Colorado INTRODUCTION During the years of 1950 to 1952 a study of the taxonomy and distribution of the Utah Orthoptera was made at the Brigham Young University by the author under the direction of Dr. Vasco M. Tan- ner. This resulted in a listing of the species found in the State. Taxonomic keys were made and compiled covering these species. Distributional notes where available were made with the brief des- criptions of the species. The work was based on the material in the entomological col- lection of the Brigham Young University, with additional records obtained from the collection of the Utah State Agricultural College.
  • Invertebrate Pest Management for Pacific Northwest Pastures

    Invertebrate Pest Management for Pacific Northwest Pastures

    Invertebrate Pest Management for Pacific Northwest Pastures A.J. Dreves, N. Kaur. M.G. Bohle, D. Hannaway, G.C. Fisher and S.I. Rondon Photo: Mylen Bohle, © Oregon State University Figure 1. A pasture in the Pacific Northwest. Introduction Amy J. Dreves, Extension A well-managed pasture (Figure 1) has several ecological and economic benefits. pest management However, a variety of pests can diminish those benefits. specialist, University of the Virgin Islands; Several species of arthropods (insects, mites and garden symphylans), and gastropods Navneet Kaur, Extension (slugs) inhabit pastures of the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Newly planted entomologist; Mylen Bohle, pastures are more vulnerable to damage caused by invertebrate pests carried over Extension agronomist; from previous rotations if preventative measures such as tillage practices, adjustment David Hannaway, Extension of planting times, removal of infected plant material and healthy plant-management forage specialist; Glenn tactics are not followed. Infestations in established pastures occur when migrating pest Fisher, emeritus Extension populations attack from adjacent areas. entomologist; and Silvia Either way, an invertebrate pest population can reduce a pasture’s productivity and Rondon, Extension yield when damage exceeds an intolerable level generally referred to as an economic entomology specialist, all of threshold level. Pest populations tend to fluctuate in nature and are heavily regulated Oregon State University. by climate, food availability and ecosystem disturbance. Biological factors such as predators, parasites and entomopathogens also play an important role in pest population suppression (Figure 2, page 2). An integrated pest management strategy can maintain pest populations below economically damaging levels. IPM is a holistic approach that relies on knowledge of pest biology and ecology and their interactions with and within systems.
  • Proc Ent Soc Mb 2019, Volume 75

    Proc Ent Soc Mb 2019, Volume 75

    Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Manitoba VOLUME 75 2019 T.D. Galloway Editor Winnipeg, Manitoba Entomological Society of Manitoba The Entomological Society of Manitoba was formed in 1945 “to foster the advancement, exchange and dissemination of Entomological knowledge”. This is a professional society that invites any person interested in entomology to become a member by application in writing to the Secretary. The Society produces the Newsletter, the Proceedings, and hosts a variety of meetings, seminars and social activities. Persons interested in joining the Society should consult the website at: http://home. cc.umanitoba.ca/~fieldspg, or contact: Sarah Semmler The Secretary Entomological Society of Manitoba [email protected] Contents Photo – Adult male European earwig, Forficula auricularia, with a newly arrived aphid, Uroleucon rudbeckiae, on tall coneflower, Rudbeckia laciniata, in a Winnipeg garden, 2017-08-05 ..................................................................... 5 Scientific Note Earwigs (Dermaptera) of Manitoba: records and recent discoveries. Jordan A. Bannerman, Denice Geverink, and Robert J. Lamb ...................... 6 Submitted Papers Microscopic examination of Lygus lineolaris (Hemiptera: Miridae) feeding injury to different growth stages of navy beans. Tharshi Nagalingam and Neil J. Holliday ...................................................................... 15 Studies in the biology of North American Acrididae development and habits. Norman Criddle. Preamble to publication