DOCSLIB.ORG

Ancient Pigs Reveal a Near-Complete Genomic Turnover Following Their Introduction to Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

This is a repository copy of Ancient pigs reveal a near-complete genomic turnover following their introduction to Europe. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/150689/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Frantz, Laurent A F, Haile, James, Lin, Audrey T et al. (97 more authors) (2019) Ancient pigs reveal a near-complete genomic turnover following their introduction to Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. pp. 17231-17238. ISSN 1091-6490 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901169116 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ 1 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES: Anthropology 2 3 Ancient pigs reveal a near-complete genomic turnover following their introduction to 4 Europe 5 6 Authors 7 Laurent A.F. Frantz1,2,a,*, James Haile2,*, Audrey T. Lin2,3,*, Amelie Scheu4, Christina Geörg4, 8 Norbert Benecke5, Michelle Alexander6, Anna Linderholm2,7, Victoria E. Mullin8,9, Kevin G. 9 Daly9, Vincent M. Battista10, Max Price11, Kurt J. Gron16, Panoraia Alexandri12, Rose-Marie 10 Arbogast13, Benjamin Arbuckle14, Adrian Bălășescu15, Ross Barnett16, László Bartosiewicz17, 11 Gennady Baryshnikov18, Clive Bonsall19, Dušan Borić20, Adina Boroneanț15, Jelena 12 Bulatović21, Canan Çakirlar22, José-Miguel Carretero23, John Chapman16, Mike Church16, 13 Richard Crooijmans24, Bea De Cupere25, Cleia Detry26, Vesna Dimitrijevic27, Valentin 14 Dumitrașcu12, Louis du Plessis3, Ceiridwen J. Edwards28, Merih Erek29, Aslı Erim- 15 Özdoğan30, Anton Ervynck31, Domenico Fulgione32, Mihai Gligor33, Anders Götherström34, 16 Lionel Gourichon35, Martien Groenen23, Daniel Helmer36, Hitomi Hongo37, Liora K. 17 Horwitz38, Evan K. Irving-Pease2, Ophélie Lebrasseur2,39, Joséphine Lesur40, Caroline 18 Malone41, Ninna Manaseryan42, Arkadiusz Marciniak43, Holley Martlew44, Marjan 19 Mashkour45, Roger Matthews46, Giedre Motuzaite Matuzeviciute47, Sepideh Maziar48, Erik 20 Meijaard49, Tom McGovern50, Hendrik-Jan Megens24, Rebecca Miller51,†, Azadeh 21 Mohaseb45, Jörg Orschiedt52, David Orton6, Anastasia Papathanasiou53, Mike Parker 22 Pearson54, Ron Pinhasi55, Darko Radmanović56, François-Xavier Ricaut57, Mike Richards58, 23 Richard Sabin59, Lucia Sarti60, Wolfram Schier61, Shiva Sheikhi45, Elisabeth Stephan62, John 24 R. Stewart54, Simon Stoddart63, Antonio Tagliacozzo64, Nenad Tasić65, Katerina 25 Trantalidou66, Anne Tresset45,†,Cristina Valdiosera67, Youri van den Hurk22, Sophie Van 26 Poucke25, Jean-Denis Vigne45, Alexander Yanevich68, Andrea Zeeb-Lanz69, Alexandros 27 Triantafyllidis12, M. Thomas P. Gilbert70,71, Jörg Schibler72, Peter Rowley-Conwy16 , Melinda 28 Zeder73, Joris Peters74,75, Thomas Cucchi45, Daniel G. Bradley8, Keith Dobney39, Joachim 29 Burger4, Allowen Evin76 , Linus Girdland-Flink77 , and Greger Larson2,a 30 31 1 School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. 32 2 The Palaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and History of Art, The University of 33 Oxford, Oxford, UK. 34 3 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 35 4 Palaeogenetics Group, Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (iomE), Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. 36 5 German Archaeological Institute, Department of Natural Sciences, Berlin, Germany 37 6 University of York, BioArCh, Department of Archaeology, York UK. 38 7 Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA. 39 8 Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK 40 9 Molecular Population Genetics, Smurfit Institute of Genetics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. 41 10 Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. 42 11 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Cambridge, USA. 43 12 CNRS UMR 7044, MISHA, 5 allée du Général Rouvillois, F - 67083 Strasbourg cedex 44 13 Department of Genetics, Development and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 45 Thessaloniki, Greece 46 14 The Department of Anthropology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Chapel Hill, USA. 47 15 ‘Vasile Pârvan’ Institute of Archaeology, Bucharest, Romania 48 16 Durham University, Department of Archaeology, Durham, UK. 49 17 Osteoarchaeological Research Laboratory, Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm, University, Stockholm, 50 Sweden 51 18 Laboratory of Theriology, Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia. 52 19 School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 53 20 The Italian Academy for Advanced Studies in America, Columbia University, New York, USA 54 21 Laboratory for Bioarchaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia 55 22 Institute of Archaeology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 56 23 Laboratorio de Evolución Humana, Departamento de Historia, Geografía y Comunicación Universidad de Burgos Burgos, Spain. 57 24 Wageningen University & Research, Animal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen, The Netherlands 58 25 Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, OD Earth and History of Life, Brussels, Belgium 59 26 Uniarq, Centro de Arqueologia da Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 60 Lisboa, Portugal 1 1 27 Laboratory for Bioarchaeology, Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia 2 28 Department of Biological and Geographical Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK 3 29 Department of Archaeology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey 4 30 Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, FEF, Archaeology Dept. Çanakkale, Turkey 5 31 Flanders Heritage Agency, Brussels, Belgium 6 32 University of Naples Federico II, Department of Biology, Napoli, Italy 7 33 History, Archaeology and Museology Department, 1 Decembrie 1918 University, Alba Iulia, Romania. 8 34 Department of Archaeology and Classical Studies, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. 9 35 Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, CEPAM (UMR 7264), Nice, France. 10 36 CNRS, Archéorient (UMR 5133), Maison de l'Orient et de la Méditerranée, Lyon, France. 11 37 Department of Evolutionary Studies of Biosystems, Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan. 12 38 National Natural History Collections, Faculty of Life Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. 13 39 Department of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 14 40 CNRS / MNHN - UMR 7209 AASPE, 55 rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France. 15 41 School of Natural and Built Environment, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. 16 42 Scientific center of Zoology and Hydroecology, Institute of Zoology, Yerevan, Armenia. 17 43 Institute of Archaeology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland. 18 44 The Hellenic Archaeological Research Foundation, Tivoli House, Tivoli Road, Cheltenham GL50 2TD 19 45 CNRS / MNHN - UMR 7209 Archaeozoology, Archaeobotany laboratory (AASPE), Paris, France 20 46 Department of Archaeology, University of Reading, Reading, UK. 21 47 Lithuanian Institute of History, Vilnius University, Lithuania. 22 48 Institut für Archäologische Wissenschaften, Goethe University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany 23 49 IUCN/SSC Wild Pig Specialist Group, Jakarta, Indonesia 24 50 Anthropology Department, Hunter College and Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, USA. 25 51 Service de Préhistoire, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium. 26 52 Free University of Berlin, Institute of Prehistoric Archaeology, Berlin, Germany. 27 53 Ephorate of Paleoanthropology and Speleology, Greek Ministry of Culture, Athens, Greece. 28 54 Institute of Archaeology, University College London, UK. 29 55 Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 30 56 Museum of Vojvodina, Novi Sad, Serbia 31 57 Laboratoire Évolution & Diversité Biologique (EDB UMR 5174), Université de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France. 32 58 Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada. 33 59 Division of Vertebrates, Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. 34 60 Dipartimento di Scienze storiche e dei Beni Culturali, University of Siena, m Siena, Italy. 35 61 Landesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Osteologie, Konstanz, Germany. 36 62 Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Talbot Campus, Fern Barrow, Poole, Dorset, BH12 5BB 37 63 Magdalene College, Cambridge, UK 38 64 Sezione di Bioarcheologia, Museo delle Civiltà, Roma, Italy. 39 65 Faculty of Philosophy, Department for Archaeology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia. 40 66 Ministry of Culture and Sports, Department of
Recommended publications
  • Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives

    Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives

    Comparative and Global Perspectives on Japanese Archaeology Burial Mounds in Europe and Japan Comparative and Contextual Perspectives edited by Access Thomas Knopf, Werner Steinhaus and Shin’ya FUKUNAGAOpen Archaeopress Archaeopress Archaeology © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78969 007 1 ISBN 978 1 78969 008 8 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the authors 2018 © All image rights are secured by the authors (Figures edited by Werner Steinhaus) Access Cover illustrations: Mori-shōgunzuka mounded tomb located in Chikuma-shi in Nagano prefecture, Japan, by Werner Steinhaus (above) Magdalenenberg burial mound at Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany,Open by Thomas Knopf (below) The printing of this book wasArchaeopress financed by the Sainsbury Institute for the Study of Japanese Arts and Cultures All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Oxuniprint, Oxford This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com © Archaeopress and the authors, 2018. Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................................................................... iii List of authors .................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Pottery Technology As a Revealer of Cultural And

    Pottery Technology As a Revealer of Cultural And

    Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis (3100–1600 BC, Western Switzerland) Eve Derenne, Vincent Ard, Marie Besse To cite this version: Eve Derenne, Vincent Ard, Marie Besse. Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis (3100–1600 BC, Western Switzerland). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, Elsevier, 2020, 58, pp.101170. 10.1016/j.jaa.2020.101170. hal-03051558 HAL Id: hal-03051558 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03051558 Submitted on 10 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 58 (2020) 101170 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Anthropological Archaeology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jaa Pottery technology as a revealer of cultural and symbolic shifts: Funerary and ritual practices in the Sion ‘Petit-Chasseur’ megalithic necropolis T (3100–1600 BC,
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached

    This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached

    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Journal of Human Evolution 60 (2011) 618e636 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol On the evolution of diet and landscape during the Upper Paleolithic through Mesolithic at Franchthi Cave (Peloponnese, Greece) Mary C. Stiner a,*, Natalie D. Munro b a School of Anthropology, P.O. Box 210030, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0030, USA b Department of Anthropology, Unit 2176, 354 Mansfield Rd., University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA article info abstract Article history: Franchthi Cave in southern Greece preserves one of the most remarkable records of socioeconomic change Received 1 July 2010 of the Late Pleistocene through early Holocene. Located on the southern end of the Argolid Peninsula, the Accepted 17 December 2010 area around the site was greatly affected by climate variation and marine transgression. This study examines the complex interplay of site formation processes (material deposition rates), climate-driven Keywords: landscape change, and human hunting systems during the Upper Paleolithic through Mesolithic at Zooarchaeology Franchthi Cave based on the H1B faunal series.
  • Regional Diversity in Subsistence Among Early Farmers In

    Regional Diversity in Subsistence Among Early Farmers In

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Edinburgh Research Explorer Edinburgh Research Explorer Regional diversity in subsistence among early farmers in Southeast Europe revealed by archaeological organic residues Citation for published version: Cramp, L, Ethier, J, Urem-Kotsou, D, Bonsall, C, Bori, D, Boronean, A, Evershed, RP, Peri, S, Roffet- Salque, M, Whelton, H & Ivanova, M 2019, 'Regional diversity in subsistence among early farmers in Southeast Europe revealed by archaeological organic residues' Proceedings of the Royal Society B., vol. 286, no. 1894, 2347. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2347 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1098/rspb.2018.2347 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 05. Apr. 2019 Regional diversity in subsistence among royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rspb early farmers in Southeast Europe revealed by archaeological organic residues Research Lucy J.
  • Was There Ever a Single Grave Culture in East Denmark? Traditions and Transformations in the 3Rd Millennium BC Iversen, Rune

    Was There Ever a Single Grave Culture in East Denmark? Traditions and Transformations in the 3Rd Millennium BC Iversen, Rune

    Was there ever a Single Grave culture in East Denmark? Traditions and transformations in the 3rd millennium BC Iversen, Rune Published in: Transitional Landscapes? The 3rd Millennium BC in Europe Publication date: 2016 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Iversen, R. (2016). Was there ever a Single Grave culture in East Denmark? Traditions and transformations in the 3rd millennium BC. In M. Furholt, R. Grossmann, & M. Szmyt (Eds.), Transitional Landscapes? The 3rd Millennium BC in Europe (pp. 159-170). Dr. Rudolf Habelt. Universitätsforschungen zur Prähistorischen Archäologie Vol. 292 Download date: 26. sep.. 2021 2 UFFE RASMUSSEN 3 Universitätsforschungen zur prähistorischen Archäologie TRANSITIONAL LANDSCAPES? RD Band 292 THE 3 MILLENNIUM BC IN EUROPE Human Development in Landscapes 9 Herausgegeben für die Graduiertenschule >Human Development in Landscapes< der Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel Herausgeber: Johannes Müller In Kommission bei Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 2016 TRANSITIONAL LANDSCAPES? RD THE 3 MILLENNIUM BC IN EUROPE Proceedings of the International Workshop "Socio-Environmental Dynamics over the Last 12,000 Years: The Creation of Landscapes III (15th – 18th April 2013)" in Kiel edited by: Martin Furholt, Ralph Großmann, Marzena Szmyt In Kommission bei Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 2016 4 UFFE RASMUSSEN 5 Gedruckt mit Unterstützung der deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Redaktion: Martin Furholt, Ralph Großmann, Marzena Szmyt Englisches Korrektorat: Eileen Küçükkaraca, Kiel Layout: Janine Cordts, Kiel Satz: Janine Cordts, Kiel Bildbearbeitung: Janine Cordts, Eileen Küçükkaraca, Kiel Umschlaggestaltung: Karin Winter, Kiel Druck: BELTZ Bad Langensalza GmbH 2016 in Kommission bei Verlag Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn ISBN 978-3-7749-4061-1 Titel auch als eBook (PDF) erhältlich unter www.habelt.de Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie.
  • Relationships Between Round Barrows and Landscapes from 1500 Bc–Ac 1086

    Relationships Between Round Barrows and Landscapes from 1500 Bc–Ac 1086

    The University of Manchester Research Other Types of Meaning: Relationships between Round Barrows and Landscapes from 1500 bc–ac 1086 DOI: 10.1017/S0959774316000433 Document Version Accepted author manuscript Link to publication record in Manchester Research Explorer Citation for published version (APA): Cooper, A. (2016). Other Types of Meaning: Relationships between Round Barrows and Landscapes from 1500 bc–ac 1086. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 26(4), 665-696. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774316000433 Published in: Cambridge Archaeological Journal Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on Manchester Research Explorer is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Proof version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Explorer are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Takedown policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please refer to the University of Manchester’s Takedown Procedures [http://man.ac.uk/04Y6Bo] or contact [email protected] providing relevant details, so we can investigate your claim. Download date:29. Sep. 2021 Cambridge Archaeological Journal For Peer Review Other types of meaning: relationships between round barrows and
  • New Dates for the Late Neolithic Corded Ware Culture Burials and Early Husbandry in the East Baltic Region

    New Dates for the Late Neolithic Corded Ware Culture Burials and Early Husbandry in the East Baltic Region

    Archaeofauna 16 (2007): 21-31 New dates for the Late Neolithic Corded Ware Culture burials and early husbandry in the East Baltic region LEMBI LÕUGAS1, AIVAR KRIISKA2 & LIINA MALDRE3 1 Institute of History, Tallinn University, Rüütli 6, EE10130 Tallinn, Estonia. e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of History, Tartu University, Ülikooli 18, EE50090 Tartu, Estonia. 3 Institute of History, Tallinn University, Rüütli 6, EE10130 Tallinn, Estonia. (Received December 18, 2006; Revised April 10, 2007; Accepted April 16, 2007) ABSTRACT: The appearance of the Corded Ware Culture in the eastern Baltic area has been associated with the beginning of animal husbandry in this region. The culture is quite well re- presented by artefacts around the Baltic Sea basin, whereas its animal bone material seems to have been partly mixed with either that of the Combed Ware Culture, whose economy was based on hunting, fishing and gathering, or with later material. Radiocarbon dates have placed the beginning of the Corded Ware Culture in the eastern Baltic region in the time interval 3000- 2700 cal BC. New dates from Estonia confirm that the phenomenon appeared here at that time. The beginning of animal husbandry in the East Baltic is discussed on the basis of the new dates and the animal bone finds from Corded Ware Culture settlement sites and burials. Important fac- tors in the spreading of early farming in addition to climate, were geographical and environ- mental conditions. KEYWORDS: EAST BALTIC, ESTONIA, LATE NEOLITHIC, CORDED WARE CUL- TURE, DOMESTIC ANIMALS RESUMEN: La cultura de las cerámicas cordadas en el Báltico oriental se asocia con el inicio de la ganadería en la zona.
  • Editors RICHARD FOSTER FLINT GORDON

    Editors RICHARD FOSTER FLINT GORDON

    editors EDWARD S RICHARD FOSTER FLINT GORDON EN, III ---IRKING ROUSE YALE U IVE, R T ' HAVEN, _ONNEC. ICUT RADIOCARBON Editors: EDWARD S. DEEVEY-RICHARD FOSTER FLINT-J. GORDON OG1 EN, III-IRVING ROUSE Managing Editor: RENEE S. KRA Published by THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE Editors: JOHN RODGERS AND JOHN H. OSTROI7 Published semi-annually, in Winter and Summer, at Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Subscription rate $30.00 (for institutions), $20.00 (for individuals), available only by volume. All correspondence and manuscripts should be addressed to the Managing Editor, RADIOCARBON, Box 2161, Yale Station, New Haven, Connecticut 06520. INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRIBUTORS Manuscripts of radiocarbon papers should follow the recommendations in Sugges- tions to Authors, 5th ed. All copy must be typewritten in double space (including the bibliography): manuscripts for vol. 13, no. 1 must be submitted in duplicate by February 1, 1971, and for vol. 13, no. 2 by August 1, 1971. Description of samples, in date lists, should follow as closely as possible the style shown in this volume. Each separate entry (date or series) in a date list should be considered an abstract, prepared in such a way that descriptive material is distinguished from geologic or archaeologic interpretation, but description and interpretation must be both brief and informative. Date lists should therefore not be preceded by abstracts, but abstracts of the more usual form should accompany all papers (e.g. geochemical contributions) that are directed to specific problems. Each description should include the following data, if possible in the order given: 1. Laboratory number, descriptive name (ordinarily that of the locality of collec- tion), and the date expressed in years B.P.
  • Štýřice III (Koněvova St. Or Vídeňská St.) – an Epigravettian Site in Brno (Czech Republic)

    Štýřice III (Koněvova St. Or Vídeňská St.) – an Epigravettian Site in Brno (Czech Republic)

    Volume V ● Issue 1/2014 ● Pages 7–18 INTERDISCIPLINARIA ARCHAEOLOGICA NATURAL SCIENCES IN ARCHAEOLOGY homepage: http://www.iansa.eu V/1/2014 Štýřice III (Koněvova St. or Vídeňská St.) – an Epigravettian Site in Brno (Czech Republic) Zdeňka Nerudováa*, Petr Nerudaa aAnthropos Institute, Moravian Museum, Zelný trh 6, Brno 659 37, Czech Republic ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT: Article history: The paper summarises the results of Palaeolithic research in Vídeňská (former Koněvova) Street in the Received: 1 August 2014 city of Brno. After the first small-scale excavations carried by K. Valoch in 1972, primarily rescue ex- Accepted: 16 September 2014 cavations in recent years (2009–2014) have revealed the extent and intensity of the Palaeolithic settle- ment. The specific features of the locality are represented by imported raw materials, a high frequency Key words: of burins compared to other tools and a predominance of Mammuthus primigenius among the faunal Moravia remains. The settlement was earlier classified as Epigravettian which is confirmed by new radiocarbon Svratka River dating. Based on the knowledge obtained in the immediate neighbourhood of the locality, it became Epigravettian apparent that this convenient area near the river repeatedly attracted people to build settlements in these subsistence strategies places, in all probability specialised groups of hunters. Despite the climatically unfavourable final part of the LGT period (after a definition by Markova et al. 2013), within which the settlement at Brno- -Štýřice III falls based on radiocarbon dating and malacofauna, we can take into consideration a denser settlement strategy than is usually assumed in the broader context of the Middle Danube Region.
  • From Seeberg to Colmar: Early Mathematical Concepts in Prehistoric Europe at the Interface Between Material Culture, Technology and Metaphors

    From Seeberg to Colmar: Early Mathematical Concepts in Prehistoric Europe at the Interface Between Material Culture, Technology and Metaphors

    Praehistorische Zeitschrift; 2014; 89(1): 1–11 Abhandlung Aleksander Dzbyński From Seeberg to Colmar: early mathematical concepts in prehistoric Europe at the interface between material culture, technology and metaphors Abstract: Im Mittelpunkt dieses Artikels stehen Ver- fouilles à Colmar en Alsace. Ces perles, d’un type carac- gleichsanalysen von Kupferperlen der Cortaillod-Kultur téristique de la culture de Cortaillod, furent retrouvées sowie einleitend das Depot von Seeberg Burgäschisee- dans une tombe énéolithique. La répartition de ces objets Süd. Dieses Depot war für eine lange Zeit ein isolierter dans la sépulture lève enfin le doute sur la valeur que l’on Fundkomplex, sodass vonseiten der Forschung Thesen plaçait sur ces perles. L’étude comparative de ces deux zu dessen metrologischer Struktur als wenig überzeu- dépôts, qui fait appel à des méthodes tant statistiques gend angesehen wurden. 2008 jedoch kam es zu einem que conventionnelles, constitue le noyau de cet article ; Durchbruch für die Forschung, konnte doch in Colmar in elle nous permet d’approfondir nos connaissances dans einem äneolithischen Grab eine für die Cortaillod-Kultur le domaine problématique des notions mathématiques charakteristische Perlenkette geborgen werden, deren et métrologiques existant en Europe à l’époque préhisto- Platzierung in der Bestattung eine Bewertung der Stellung rique. Les perles de la culture de Cortaillod se trouvent à und Bedeutung jener Perlen während des Äneolithikums l’intersection de méthodes plus archaïques et moins abs- erlaubte. Für die hier vorgelegten Analysen sind diese traites dans le domaine des mathématiques et du dénom- Perlen von großer Bedeutung, vergleichbar etwa mit dem brement et des nouvelles notions liées à l’apparition de la „Stein von Rosette“ für die Entzifferung der Hieroglyphen, métallurgie.
  • 293 Radiocarbon and Stable

    293 Radiocarbon and Stable

    RADIOCARBON, Vol 46, Nr 1, 2004, p 293–300 © 2004 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona RADIOCARBON AND STABLE ISOTOPE EVIDENCE OF DIETARY CHANGE FROM THE MESOLITHIC TO THE MIDDLE AGES IN THE IRON GATES: NEW RESULTS FROM LEPENSKI VIR C Bonsall1,2 • G T Cook3 • R E M Hedges4 • T F G Higham4 • C Pickard1 • I RadovanoviÊ5 ABSTRACT. A previous radiocarbon dating and stable isotope study of directly associated ungulate and human bone samples from Late Mesolithic burials at Schela Cladovei in Romania established that there is a freshwater reservoir effect of approximately 500 yr in the Iron Gates reach of the Danube River valley in southeast Europe. Using the δ15N values as an indicator of the percentage of freshwater protein in the human diet, the 14C data for 24 skeletons from the site of Lepenski Vir were corrected for this reservoir effect. The results of the paired 14C and stable isotope measurements provide evidence of substantial dietary change over the period from about 9000 BP to about 300 BP. The data from the Early Mesolithic to the Chalcolithic are consistent with a 2-component dietary system, where the linear plot of isotopic values reflects mixing between the 2 end-members to differing degrees. Typically, the individuals of Mesolithic age have much heavier δ15N signals and slightly heavier δ13C, while individuals of Early Neolithic and Chalcolithic age have lighter δ15N and δ13C values. Contrary to our earlier suggestion, there is no evidence of a substantial population that had a transitional diet midway between those that were characteristic of the Mesolithic and Neolithic.
  • Paleoanthropology of the Balkans and Anatolia, Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-0874-4 326 Index

    Paleoanthropology of the Balkans and Anatolia, Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology, DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-0874-4 326 Index

    Index A Bajloni’s calotte BAJ, 17, 19–20 Accretion model of Neanderthal evolution, 29 Balanica Acculturation, 164–165, 253 BH-1, 15, 24–29, 309 Acheulean, 80, 148, 172, 177, 201, 205, 306, 308, 310 hominin, 15–17, 29 large flake, 129, 132, 218 Mala, vi, 16, 24, 30, 139–140, 144–145, lithic artifacts, 80 148, 309–311 Lower, 308 Velika, 24, 36, 139–140, 144–145, 148 Middle, 308 Balıtepe, 214, 223–224 Admixture, vi, 29, 258 Balkan, v, 3, 139, 159, 171, 187, 218, 229, 274, 282, 303 Neanderthal, 51–64 and Anatolia, 308–310 Adriatic, 46, 154, 157, 162, 164–166 Central, vi, 3, 15–30, 139–150 Aegean, 29–30, 74–76, 116, 119, 121–122, 134–135, 148, 213, implications for earliest settlement of Europe, 220–221, 261, 283, 305, 316 187–210 Aizanoi, 221 Mountains, 69, 187 Akçeşme, 214, 223–224 and neighbouring regions, 229–261 Aktaş, 214, 217 Peninsula, 51, 70, 74, 119, 134, 150, 187, 201, 208 Alluvial plain, 125, 314 Southern, 3, 12, 47, 275 Alykes, 270, 272 Bañolas mandible, 28 Amărăști, 176–177, 181 Basalt, 201, 217–218, 220, 284 Anatolia (Asia Minor), 3, 79–80, 308–310 Basins, 51, 74, 99, 119, 139, 213, 281, 303 Central (Region), 128, 132, 134, 213, 217–218, 220, 223, 313 Anagni, 306 Eastern (Region), 217 Apennine, 310, 314 and hominin dispersals, 213–225 Beni Fouda, 307 North, 120 Čačak-Kraljevo, 140 Southeastern (Region), 215, 217, 220, 223 Carpathian, 51, 148 west, 119, 121 Denizli, 83 Anatomically modern human, 23, 36, 41, 44, 46, 55–56, 62, 70, 72, evolution on archaeological distributions, 313–317 76, 95, 111, 153, 165–166, 229 Grevena, 269, 272 Apidima, 4, 7–8, 11–12, 96, 310–311 Kalloni, 121–122 Apolakkia, 270–271 Megalopolis, 9, 12, 134–135, 298 Apollonia, 74, 270, 273, 276–277, 286–287 Mygdonia, 12, 273 Arago, 10, 25, 29, 56, 59, 87–90, 149, 312 Niš, 139, 146 Archaeological pattern, 303, 305 Pannonian, 15, 23, 319 Areopolis, 97 Thessalian, 310 Asprochaliko, 95, 148, 238–239, 253, 260 Venosa, 306 Assimilation model, 162 Belen Tepe, 221–222, 225 Atapuerca, 28, 276, 285, 287, 312, 318 Benkovski, 187, 205–209, 309 Sima de los Huesos, 27–29, 304, 306–307 BH-1.