DOCSLIB.ORG

A Critical Review of “The Mesolithic” in Relation to Siberian Archaeology ALEXANDER B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Critical Review of “The Mesolithic” in Relation to Siberian Archaeology ALEXANDER B ARCTIC VOL. 38, NO. 3 (SEPTEMBER 1985) P. 178-187 A Critical Review of “the Mesolithic” in Relation to Siberian Archaeology ALEXANDER B. DOLITSKY’ ABSTRACT. This paperexplores the potentialof the economic-ecqlogical method basedon the exploitation of fishresources for Mesolithic site iden- tification, as compared to the recently popular yet indecisive technological-typologicalmethod, to predict the existence of “Mesolithic-like” sub- sistence activities in Siberia during the Sartan-Holocene“transition” period. The article is an attempt toestablish, or at least topropose, new criteria that can lead toa higher level of understandingof Mesolithic economies insubarctic and arctic regions. Also, decision-making processes that operate to achieve behavioralgoals based on efficiency of human beingsare suggested. The model, designed with respectto geographical regions identified as interbiotic zones, has the advantage of offering specific alternative hypotheses enabling the definition of both environmental properties and predicted human behavior. Key words: Mesolithic, Siberia, interbiotic zone RÉSUMÉ. L’article &die le potentiel de la méthode économique-écologique fondte sur l’exploitation de poissons en guise de ressources pour l’identification desites mtsolithiques, en comparison avecla mdthode technologique-typologique populaire maisindécise, afin de prddire l’existence d’activitds de subsistencede genre mésolithique en Sibdrie durant la périodede transition Sartan-Holoctne. On tente d’établir ou au moins de pro- poser de nouveaux crittres qui pourraient permettre une meilleure comprdhension des économies mdsolithiques dans les rdgions arctiques et sub- arctiques. De plus, on suggkre des processus de prise de ddcisions qui visent21 établir des buts de comportement fondéssur l’efficacité de I’être hu- main.Conçu par rapport 21 des rdgionsgéographiques nommées zones interbiotiques, le modele a l’avantage d’offrir des choix particuliers d’hypothtses permettant la ddfinition des propridtés environnementales et du comportement humain prévu. Mots cl&: mésolithique, zone interbiotique Traduit pour le journal par Maurice Guibord. INTRODUCTION tions and site morphology, and a new type of social organiza- This paper suggestsan economic-ecological method of tion of early hunting groups. analysis for the identification ofthe Sartan-Holocene arch- This paper criticizes the traditional way of classification of aeological sites in Cis-Baykal. This method is based on the archaeological assemblages, sites or stages often employed by theoretical assumption that adaptive processes, or long-term the comparative technological-typologicalmethod of analysis, changes, are a result of adaptive, short-term strategies of early suggested first over 100 years ago by a brilliant French arch- hunters to obtain and use fishing subsistence resources. Long- aeologist, De Mortillet. In classifying archaeological data, it time adaptive processes can be explained as the movement of seems more appropriate to me to consider first the relationship human activities into “specialized locations depeoding on the of human groups to their subsistence needs, inferring rational availabilityof particular natural . resources” (Bennett, principles ofhuman economic behavior. Artifacts, tech- 1969: 14). Accepting Bennett’s definition of adaptive strategy, nology, dwellings, etc., are the result of human-environment I shall attempt to explain the behavioral mechanism ofhunters interactions and can be very similar even when there are no and gatherers in their habitat, i.e., the relationships between geographical or intellectual contacts between people (broadly human subsistence regimes and environmental quality, and similar archaeological material can befound in western why man chooses a certain location for living. By using Ben- Europe, Africa and North America). Probably material culture nett’s concept of adaptive processes, I would like to suggest a is more similar where the behavioral or adaptive strategies method for identification of a Mesolithic economy in arctic within ecosystems are alike. In this paper, I intend to suggest and subarctic regions. an explanatory-predictive subsistence model, namely the inter- It is possible that the Siberian archaeological traditions of biotic zone, for the identification of Mesolithic sites in north- theLate Pleistocene-Early Holocene periodcan be related em latitudes based on the exploitation of fish resources. This socioeconomically and chronologically to the Eurasian Meso- article proposes new criteria that can lead to a new level of lithic. The Mesolithic in the Old World, just as the Sartan- understanding of Mesolithic economies in subarctic and arctic Holocene “transition” period in Siberia, belongs to the time regions. of dramatic deglaciation, climatic change and extensive ap- pearance ofnew subsistence resources characterized by medium- and small-size, fast-running animals and rich fresh- CLASSIFICATION OF THE MESOLITHIC water resources. The interaction of early hunters withnew There is disagreement among archaeologists concerning the subsistence resources probably directly affected their adaptive temporal placement and definition of the Mesolithic period. strategy, resulting in a new socioeconomic level that included Some archaeologists (Childe, 1957; Rogachevand Oklad- a new lithic technology, geographical variability of site loca- nikov, 1966, cited in Matyushin, 1976)have suggested the ‘Department of Russian,Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania 19010, U.S.A. Mailing address: 2301Woodward St., Apt. 1-7, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191 15, U.S.A. “THE MESOLITHIC” AND SIBERIAN ARCHAEOLOGY 179 term “Epipaleolithic” or “Paleolithic of Holocene” instead conditions, sedentary mode of life, population growth, domes- of the term “Mesolithic.” They also have suggested combin- ticationof middle-sized grasslandanimals) had arisen that ing the Mesolithic and Paleolithic periods into a single were necessary for the introduction of the food-producing era. cultural-historical unit, arguing that there isno significant G. Clark (1952, 1972) proposed a different approach to the technological difference between these periods. Others strong- classification of the Mesolithic in a number of hispublications. ly oppose the joining of the two periods, suggesting that the He suggested distinguishing the Mesolithic from other stages Mesolithicis better termed as “preceramicNeolithic” and by treating it chronologically. According to Clark, the thus should be included with the Neolithic stage. A last group Mesolithic began in the Holocene period (about 8000 - 8300 of archaeologists (Efimenko, 1953; Martynov, 1981; Matyu- years B.P.) in Europe and continued for almost 3000 years, shin, 1976; and Chernysh, 1975) consider the Mesolithic to be until the climate in Europe and Asia finally stabilized. Clark’s a separate period, representing the transition of Paleolithic classification seems reliable. However, some archaeologists forms of subsistence to the Neolithic ones. They argue that do not agree with him. Kozlowski (1973) suggests the Mesoli- such a transition came about because socioeconomic precondi- thic be considered from a economic-ecologicalpoint of view. tions for the transition of food-gathering tofood-producing ac- Although he agrees that the Mesolithic began in Europe during tivities were established during the Mesolithic period. the Early Holocene, he also believes that a Mesolithic type of The significance of the Mesolithic is that it was a crucial economy could develop in different geographical regions and period during which the mode of productionchanged and chronological periods. He sees its development as a result of people began to play a major role in their relationships to the the tundra hunter’s adaptation to a woodland ecosystem, environment (Dolukhanovand Khotinsky, 1974). Underthe established during the early Holocene in the European low- term “mode of production” Soviet researchers usually mean lands. Thus, Kozlowski (also see Bader, 1974) identifies the the entity of four interrelated processes: technical (transmis- Mesolithic only where tundrahabitats were replaced by wood- sionand transformation of energyfrom one form into land ones. To me, the economic-ecological approachto Meso- another); technological (transformation ofraw material into lithic classification seems more useful than the chronological accomplished products); organizational (spatial and temporal one. However, it must not be claimed that the development of coordination ofall elements of production); and economic Mesolithic traditions was limited to Eurasian woodland zones (coordination of interests of a subject of production and of alone. economy forming a whole) (Semenov and Korobkova, 1983). Recently, Price (1983) suggested a provocative definition of Most archaeologists find it productive to define the Mesolithic the term Mesolithic. To Price (1983:762) “the Mesolithic is as the transitional period. During the Mesolithic, socio- not associated exclusively with the utilization of microlithic economic conditions developed that effected the transition tools, nor with the exploitation of forests and coasts, nor with from the Paleolithic food-gathering stage to the Neolithic the domestication of the dog,” but it is the “period of the food-producing stage. Simultaneously withthis change the Postglacial prior to the introduction of agriculture.” Thus, it new subsistence technology developed. One of the significant follows that Price’s definition of the term Mesolithic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From the Mesolithic to the Chalcolithic in the South Caucasus: New Data from the Bavra Ablari Rock Shelter
    Book Chapter From the Mesolithic to the Chalcolithic in the South Caucasus: New data from the Bavra Ablari rock shelter VAROUTSIKOS, Bastien, et al. Abstract The site of Bavra-Ablari is a Mesolithic-Chalcolithic rock shelter, located on the Javakheti plateau in the valley of a tributary of the Kura River, in southern Georgia. Excavations have been carried out by a Georgian-French team since 2012 and have shed light on processes that took place during the Early Holocene. The Mesolithic layer of the site shows an occupation, not yet fully excavated, which will provide important chrono-cultural information about the exploitation of the mountainous areas during the ninth millennium BCE. The Neolithic occupation chronologically matches the first evidence of agricultural society in the Near East during the sixth millennium BCE, and is characterised by a combination of Neolithic and Mesolithic features. The Chalcolithic layer produced a significant collection of material that supports a re-occupation of the highlands during the fifth millennium, as well as the development of subsistence strategies adapted to this environment. Reference VAROUTSIKOS, Bastien, et al. From the Mesolithic to the Chalcolithic in the South Caucasus: New data from the Bavra Ablari rock shelter. In: Batmaz A., Bedianashvili G., Michalewicz A., Robinson A. Context and Connection: Essays on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East in Honour of Antonio Sagona. Leuven : Peeters, 2017. Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:91771 Disclaimer: layout of this document
    [Show full text]
  • Persistence of Middle Stone Age Technology to the Pleistocene/Holocene Transition Supports a Complex Hominin Evolutionary Scenario in West Africa
    This is a repository copy of Persistence of Middle Stone Age technology to the Pleistocene/Holocene transition supports a complex hominin evolutionary scenario in West Africa. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/129212/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Scerri, E.M.L., Blinkhorn, J., Niang, K. et al. (2 more authors) (2017) Persistence of Middle Stone Age technology to the Pleistocene/Holocene transition supports a complex hominin evolutionary scenario in West Africa. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 11. pp. 639-646. ISSN 2352-409X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.003 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Persistence of Middle Stone Age technology to the Pleistocene/Holocene transition supports a complex hominin evolutionary scenario in West Africa Eleanor M.L. Scerria*, James Blinkhornb, Khady Niangc, Mark D. Batemand, Huw S. Groucutta a Research
    [Show full text]
  • New Dates for the Late Neolithic Corded Ware Culture Burials and Early Husbandry in the East Baltic Region
    Archaeofauna 16 (2007): 21-31 New dates for the Late Neolithic Corded Ware Culture burials and early husbandry in the East Baltic region LEMBI LÕUGAS1, AIVAR KRIISKA2 & LIINA MALDRE3 1 Institute of History, Tallinn University, Rüütli 6, EE10130 Tallinn, Estonia. e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of History, Tartu University, Ülikooli 18, EE50090 Tartu, Estonia. 3 Institute of History, Tallinn University, Rüütli 6, EE10130 Tallinn, Estonia. (Received December 18, 2006; Revised April 10, 2007; Accepted April 16, 2007) ABSTRACT: The appearance of the Corded Ware Culture in the eastern Baltic area has been associated with the beginning of animal husbandry in this region. The culture is quite well re- presented by artefacts around the Baltic Sea basin, whereas its animal bone material seems to have been partly mixed with either that of the Combed Ware Culture, whose economy was based on hunting, fishing and gathering, or with later material. Radiocarbon dates have placed the beginning of the Corded Ware Culture in the eastern Baltic region in the time interval 3000- 2700 cal BC. New dates from Estonia confirm that the phenomenon appeared here at that time. The beginning of animal husbandry in the East Baltic is discussed on the basis of the new dates and the animal bone finds from Corded Ware Culture settlement sites and burials. Important fac- tors in the spreading of early farming in addition to climate, were geographical and environ- mental conditions. KEYWORDS: EAST BALTIC, ESTONIA, LATE NEOLITHIC, CORDED WARE CUL- TURE, DOMESTIC ANIMALS RESUMEN: La cultura de las cerámicas cordadas en el Báltico oriental se asocia con el inicio de la ganadería en la zona.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Reversals and the Transition to Agriculture
    CLIMATE REVERSALS AND THE TRANSITION TO AGRICULTURE Gregory K. Dow, Clyde G. Reed, and Nancy Olewiler Department of Economics Simon Fraser University July 2008 Abstract. Until about 13,000 years ago all humans obtained their food through hunting and gathering, but thereafter people in some parts of the world began a transition to agriculture. Recent data strongly implicate climate change as the driving force behind the transition in southwest Asia. We propose a model of this process in which population and technology respond endogenously to climate. After a period of favorable environmental conditions during which regional population grew, an abrupt climate reversal forced people to take refuge at a few favored sites. The resulting spike in local population density reduced the marginal product of labor in foraging and made cultivation attractive. Once cultivation began, technological progress, including artificial selection, eventually led to domesticated plants. Farming became a permanent part of the regional economy when productivity growth was combined with climate recovery. The available data on cases of transition and non-transition are consistent with this model but often inconsistent with rival explanations. Acknowledgment. Doug Allen, Matthew Baker, Ofer Bar-Yosef, Cliff Bekar, Sam Bowles, Sue Colledge, Patrick Francois, Brian Hayden, Hillard Kaplan, Gordon Myers, Arthur Robson, and four anonymous referees for the Journal of Economic Growth commented on earlier drafts. We are grateful to audiences at Simon Fraser University, the University of British Columbia, the 2005 SSHA meeting, the 2006 AEA meeting, the 2006 SFU workshop on the Neolithic transition, and the 2006 Conference on Early Economic Developments at the University of Copenhagen.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimations of Population Density for Selected Periods Between the Neolithic and AD 1800 Andreas Zimmermann University of Cologne, [email protected]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital Commons@Wayne State University Human Biology Volume 81 Issue 2 Special Issue on Demography and Cultural Article 13 Macroevolution 2009 Estimations of Population Density for Selected Periods Between the Neolithic and AD 1800 Andreas Zimmermann University of Cologne, [email protected] Johanna Hilpert University of Cologne Karl Peter Wendt University of Cologne Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/humbiol Recommended Citation Zimmermann, Andreas; Hilpert, Johanna; and Wendt, Karl Peter (2009) "Estimations of Population Density for Selected Periods Between the Neolithic and AD 1800," Human Biology: Vol. 81: Iss. 2-3, Article 13. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/ humbiol/vol81/iss2/13 Estimations of Population Density for Selected Periods Between the Neolithic and AD 1800 Abstract We describe a combination of methods applied to obtain reliable estimations of population density using archaeological data. The ombc ination is based on a hierarchical model of scale levels. The necessary data and methods used to obtain the results are chosen so as to define transfer functions from one scale level to another. We apply our method to data sets from western Germany that cover early Neolithic, Iron Age, Roman, and Merovingian times as well as historical data from AD 1800. Error margins and natural and historical variability are discussed. Our results for nonstate societies are always lower than conventional estimations compiled from the literature, and we discuss the reasons for this finding. At the end, we compare the calculated local and global population densities with other estimations from different parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 293 Radiocarbon and Stable
    RADIOCARBON, Vol 46, Nr 1, 2004, p 293–300 © 2004 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona RADIOCARBON AND STABLE ISOTOPE EVIDENCE OF DIETARY CHANGE FROM THE MESOLITHIC TO THE MIDDLE AGES IN THE IRON GATES: NEW RESULTS FROM LEPENSKI VIR C Bonsall1,2 • G T Cook3 • R E M Hedges4 • T F G Higham4 • C Pickard1 • I RadovanoviÊ5 ABSTRACT. A previous radiocarbon dating and stable isotope study of directly associated ungulate and human bone samples from Late Mesolithic burials at Schela Cladovei in Romania established that there is a freshwater reservoir effect of approximately 500 yr in the Iron Gates reach of the Danube River valley in southeast Europe. Using the δ15N values as an indicator of the percentage of freshwater protein in the human diet, the 14C data for 24 skeletons from the site of Lepenski Vir were corrected for this reservoir effect. The results of the paired 14C and stable isotope measurements provide evidence of substantial dietary change over the period from about 9000 BP to about 300 BP. The data from the Early Mesolithic to the Chalcolithic are consistent with a 2-component dietary system, where the linear plot of isotopic values reflects mixing between the 2 end-members to differing degrees. Typically, the individuals of Mesolithic age have much heavier δ15N signals and slightly heavier δ13C, while individuals of Early Neolithic and Chalcolithic age have lighter δ15N and δ13C values. Contrary to our earlier suggestion, there is no evidence of a substantial population that had a transitional diet midway between those that were characteristic of the Mesolithic and Neolithic.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution
    On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bar-Yosef, Ofer. 1998. “On the Nature of Transitions: The Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution.” Cam. Arch. Jnl 8 (02) (October): 141. Published Version doi:10.1017/S0959774300000986 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12211496 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Cambridge Archaeological Journal 8:2 (1998), 141-63 On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution Ofer Bar-Yosef This article discusses two major revolutions in the history of humankind, namely, the Neolithic and the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic revolutions. The course of the first one is used as a general analogy to study the second, and the older one. This approach puts aside the issue of biological differences among the human fossils, and concentrates solely on the cultural and technological innovations. It also demonstrates that issues that are common- place to the study of the trajisition from foraging to cultivation and animal husbandry can be employed as an overarching model for the study of the transition from the Middle to the Upper Palaeolithic. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the core areas where each of these revolutions began, the ensuing dispersals and their geographic contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocene and Pleistocene Pluvial Periods in Yemen, Southern Arabia
    Quaternary Science Reviews 30 (2011) 783e787 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Rapid Communication Holocene and Pleistocene pluvial periods in Yemen, southern Arabia Dominik Fleitmann a,b,*, Stephen J. Burns c, Marek Pekala b, Augusto Mangini d, Abdulkarim Al-Subbary e, Mohammad Al-Aowah e, Jan Kramers a, Albert Matter b a Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Zähringerstrasse 25, 3012 Bern, Switzerland b Institute of Geological Sciences, University of Bern, Switzerland c Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts, USA d Heidelberger Akademie of Sciences, Heidelberg, Germany e Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Sana’a, Republic of Yemen article info abstract Article history: Arabia is an important potential pathway for the dispersal of Homo sapiens (“out of Africa”). Yet, because Received 5 October 2010 of its arid to hyper-arid climate humans could only migrate across southern Arabia during pluvial periods Received in revised form when environmental conditions were favorable. However, knowledge on the timing of Arabian pluvial 12 January 2011 periods prior to the Holocene is mainly based on a single and possibly incomplete speleothem record Accepted 16 January 2011 from Hoti Cave in Northern Oman. Additional terrestrial records from the Arabian Peninsula are needed Available online 5 February 2011 to confirm the Hoti Cave record. Here we present a new speleothem record from Mukalla Cave in southern Yemen. The Mukalla Cave and Hoti Cave records clearly reveal that speleothems growth Keywords: Southern Arabia occurred solely during peak interglacial periods, corresponding to Marine Isotope Stages (MIS) 1 (early to Holocene mid-Holocene), 5.1, 5.3, 5.5 (Eemian), 7.1, 7.5 and 9.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 5 Print Reference: Pages 561-572 Article 43 2003 The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island Lawson L. Schroeder Philip L. Schroeder Bryan College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Schroeder, Lawson L. and Schroeder, Philip L. (2003) "The Significance of the Ancient Standing Stones, Villages, Tombs on Orkney Island," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 5 , Article 43. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol5/iss1/43 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE ANCIENT STANDING STONES, VILLAGES AND TOMBS FOUND ON THE ORKNEY ISLANDS LAWSON L. SCHROEDER, D.D.S. PHILIP L. SCHROEDER 5889 MILLSTONE RUN BRYAN COLLEGE STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087 P. O. BOX 7484 DAYTON, TN 37321-7000 KEYWORDS: Orkney Islands, ancient stone structures, Skara Brae, Maes Howe, broch, Ring of Brodgar, Standing Stones of Stenness, dispersion, Babel, famine, Ice Age ABSTRACT The Orkney Islands make up an archipelago north of Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Paper
    Bell Beaker resilience? The 4.2ka BP event and its implications for environments and societies in Northwest Europe Jos Kleijne, Mara Weinelt, Johannes Müller Abstract This paper deals with the Bell Beaker phenomenon in Northwest Europe, and the question of its development around 2200 BC, in relation to the well-known 4.2ka climatic event. The duration of settlement occupation and the subsistence economy are the variables used in this study to address this resilience on a regional scale. Concluding, we state that regional variability exists in the ways in which communities were impacted by the 4.2ka event. In addition to agricultural intensification, the flexibility of subsistence strategies seems to have played an important role. Keywords Resilience; Bell Beaker; Northwest Europe; Settlement; Subsistence Introduction From 2600 BC onwards, Western and Central Europe are characterised by what archaeologists have historically labelled as “the Bell Beaker phenomenon” (e.g. Vander Linden 2013). In various parts of Europe, especially the Iberian Peninsula, the end of this phenomenon is often considered to date around 2200 BC, with the rise of the El Argar civilisation in the Southeast of the Peninsula, associated with significant changes in social organisation, settlement structure and food economy (Lull et al 2015). The role of climate in the demise of the Bell Beaker phenomenon, and the resilience and vulnerability of prehistoric communities, is currently being debated (e.g. Blanco-Gonzalez et al 2018; Hinz et al in press). Specifically, an abrupt climatic event around 2200 BC, commonly known as ‘the 4.2ka event’, has a well attested influence on human society in other parts of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genomic Ancestry of the Scandinavian Battle Axe Culture People and Their Relation to the Broader Corded Ware Horizon
    Malmström, H., Günther, T., Svensson, E. M., Juras, A., Fraser, M., Munters, A. R., Pospieszny, Ł., Tõrv, M., Lindström, J., Götherström, A., Storå, J., & Jakobsson, M. (2019). The genomic ancestry of the Scandinavian Battle Axe Culture people and their relation to the broader Corded Ware horizon. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1912), [20191528]. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1528 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.1098/rspb.2019.1528 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via The Royal Society at https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1528 . Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ The genomic ancestry of the Scandinavian royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rspb Battle Axe Culture people and their relation to the broader Corded Ware horizon Research Helena Malmström1,2,†, Torsten Günther1,†, Emma M. Svensson1, Anna Juras3, Cite this article: Malmström H et al. 2019 Magdalena Fraser1,4, Arielle R. Munters1, Łukasz Pospieszny5,6, Mari Tõrv7, The genomic ancestry of the Scandinavian 8 9 10 Battle Axe Culture people and their relation to Jonathan Lindström , Anders Götherström , Jan Storå the broader Corded Ware horizon.
    [Show full text]
  • Riparo Arma Di Nasino Series
    University of Rome Carbon-14 Dates VI Item Type Article; text Authors Alessio, M.; Bella, F.; Cortesi, C.; Graziadei, B. Citation Alessio, M., Bella, F., Cortesi, C., & Graziadei, B. (1968). University of Rome carbon-14 dates VI. Radiocarbon, 10(2), 350-364. DOI 10.1017/S003382220001095X Publisher American Journal of Science Journal Radiocarbon Rights Copyright © The American Journal of Science Download date 06/10/2021 12:06:07 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/651722 [RADIOCARBON, VOL. 10, No. 2, 1968, P. 350-364] UNIVERSITY OF ROME CARBON-14 DATES VI M. ALESSIO, F. BELLA Istituto di Fisica, University di Roma Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma C. CORTESI and B. GRAZIADEI Istituto di Geochimica, University di Roma The list includes age measurements carried out from December 1966 and November 1967. All samples both of archaeologic and geologic in- terest are drawn from Italian territory. Chemical techniques have remained unchanged (Bella and Cortesi, 1960). Two counters have been used for dating: the 1st, of 1.5 L, already described (Bella and Cortesi, 1960; Alessio, Bella, and Cortesi, 1964), the 2nd, of 1 L, recently assembled, is identical to the previous 1 L counter (Alessio, Bella, and Cortesi, 1964), its anticoincidence system was realized by a plastic scintillator and photomultipliers. Background 6.15 + 0.08 counts/min, counting rate for modern carbon 24.49 + 0.15 counts/min. Higher efficiency of electronic recording was obtained by reducing pulse length and by a few other changes.
    [Show full text]