DOCSLIB.ORG

An Independence from Europebritish N Ational Party Christian Peoples Alliance Conservative Party English D Emocrats Green Party

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Independence from Europebritish N Ational Party Christian Peoples Alliance Conservative Party English D Emocrats Green Party An Independence from EuropeBritish National Party Christian Peoples Alliance Conservative Party English Democrats Green Party Labour Party Liberal Democrats NO2EU UK Independence Party (UKIP)Total Babergh district 359 123 150 8,235 294 2,698 3,465 1,757 60 9,217 26,358 Basildon Borough Council 877 564 320 10,202 628 2,032 7,301 1,233 147 18,926 42,230 Bedford Borough Council 690 311 474 11,448 323 2,836 9,603 3,266 151 11,470 40,572 Braintree District Council 496 307 210 11,055 585 3,108 5,506 1,458 79 14,641 37,445 Breckland District Council 525 238 327 9,859 285 2,741 4,420 1,211 98 14,393 34,097 Brentwood Borough 369 194 191 7,469 295 1,439 2,349 1,883 37 8,521 22,747 Council Broadland District 447 186 231 10,313 244 3,415 5,288 2,142 78 12,900 35,244 Council Broxbourne Borough 550 273 143 7,209 281 972 3,353 598 77 9,489 22,945 Council Cambridge City Council 315 122 296 5,883 143 7,381 10,356 7,866 110 4,585 37,057 Castle Point Borough 743 346 156 6,159 413 1,151 2,994 439 61 11,391 23,853 Council Central Bedfordshire 1,140 507 487 20,967 657 5,019 9,623 3,534 198 24,509 66,641 Chelmsford City Council 537 234 279 13,714 457 3,162 5,285 3,790 89 16,065 43,612 Colchester Borough 695 294 317 12,680 542 4,543 6,715 5,049 115 14,489 45,439 Council Dacorum Borough 469 247 242 11,688 306 3,222 5,849 2,977 109 11,102 36,211 East Cambridgeshire 307 113 182 6,692 161 2,106 2,552 2,303 47 6,553 21,016 District Council East Hertfordshire 570 255 215 13,343 281 3,253 5,115 2,414 99 11,806 37,351 District Council An Independence from EuropeBritish National Party Christian Peoples Alliance Conservative Party English Democrats Green Party Labour Party Liberal Democrats NO2EU UK Independence Party (UKIP)Total Epping Forest District 687 390 260 10,742 485 2,301 3,915 1,709 74 13,866 34,429 Council Fenland District Council 477 236 124 6,682 322 976 2,520 778 86 10,951 23,152 Forest Heath District 172 110 111 3,587 175 762 1,410 426 121 5,814 12,688 Council Great Yarmouth Borough 567 266 107 5,871 208 1,325 5,429 463 73 11,786 26,095 Council Harlow Borough Council 450 244 159 4,319 338 1,001 5,386 572 85 8,101 20,655 Hertsmere Borough 555 185 262 9,918 197 1,582 4,604 1,266 104 7,653 26,326 Council Huntingdonshire District 831 239 344 15,335 397 3,397 4,587 3,589 139 16,765 45,623 Council Ipswich Borough Council 619 307 297 7,516 424 2,700 9,856 1,628 122 10,603 34,072 King's Lynn & West 665 322 198 11,485 424 2,902 5,562 1,252 118 16,356 39,284 Norfolk Luton Borough Council 771 428 369 6,476 319 1,946 16,847 1,572 192 10,978 39,898 Maldon District Council 236 186 89 5,599 186 1,396 1,878 634 38 7,078 17,320 Mid Suffolk District 355 174 247 9,355 322 3,784 3,291 1,608 63 9,708 28,907 Council North Hertfordshire 525 211 236 12,187 238 3,668 6,931 2,904 119 9,827 36,846 District Council North Norfolk District 378 183 148 8,423 264 2,829 3,552 4,432 61 12,260 32,530 Council Norwich City Council 515 252 262 5,578 267 9,210 11,378 2,841 145 8,066 38,514 Peterborough City 1,031 427 412 11,744 517 2,597 11,526 2,089 191 15,379 45,913 Council An Independence from EuropeBritish National Party Christian Peoples Alliance Conservative Party English Democrats Green Party Labour Party Liberal Democrats NO2EU UK Independence Party (UKIP)Total Rochford District Council 530 194 190 7,021 541 1,575 2,514 811 64 10,324 23,764 South Cambridgeshire 502 197 366 15,394 323 5,486 6,589 7,033 105 11,464 47,459 District Council South Norfolk District 487 226 226 12,168 300 4,399 4,968 2,664 95 11,898 37,431 Council Southend-on-Sea 1,073 457 375 11,523 704 3,387 6,711 2,645 191 15,967 43,033 Borough Council St Albans District Council 564 166 351 15,123 232 4,443 8,164 6,306 91 9,672 45,112 St Edmundsbury Borough 407 216 266 9,225 366 2,903 3,971 1,504 83 10,821 29,762 Council Stevenage Borough 490 203 154 4,922 311 1,318 6,766 1,220 135 7,563 23,082 Council Suffolk Coastal District 484 230 284 12,987 434 4,016 5,249 2,718 87 12,379 38,868 Council Tendring District Council 704 410 263 9,981 550 2,604 5,241 848 119 19,398 40,118 Three Rivers District 402 188 212 8,478 177 1,703 3,275 3,332 78 7,386 25,231 Council Thurrock Council 938 623 294 7,387 572 1,293 8,645 637 146 17,416 37,951 Uttlesford District 343 164 117 8,227 234 2,017 2,211 2,164 48 7,295 22,820 Council Watford Borough Council 654 230 287 5,313 213 1,855 6,580 3,762 118 5,990 25,002 Waveney District Council 476 233 197 7,793 307 2,803 6,828 846 110 11,461 31,054 Welwyn Hatfield District 587 254 200 9,294 255 2,075 5,443 1,837 114 8,530 28,589 Council Total 26,564 12,465 11,627 446,569 16,497 133,331 271,601 108,010 4,870 542,812 1,574,346.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of Councils in England by Type
    List of councils in England by type There are a total of 353 councils in England: Metropolitan districts (36) London boroughs (32) plus the City of London Unitary authorities (55) plus the Isles of Scilly County councils (27) District councils (201) Metropolitan districts (36) 1. Barnsley Borough Council 19. Rochdale Borough Council 2. Birmingham City Council 20. Rotherham Borough Council 3. Bolton Borough Council 21. South Tyneside Borough Council 4. Bradford City Council 22. Salford City Council 5. Bury Borough Council 23. Sandwell Borough Council 6. Calderdale Borough Council 24. Sefton Borough Council 7. Coventry City Council 25. Sheffield City Council 8. Doncaster Borough Council 26. Solihull Borough Council 9. Dudley Borough Council 27. St Helens Borough Council 10. Gateshead Borough Council 28. Stockport Borough Council 11. Kirklees Borough Council 29. Sunderland City Council 12. Knowsley Borough Council 30. Tameside Borough Council 13. Leeds City Council 31. Trafford Borough Council 14. Liverpool City Council 32. Wakefield City Council 15. Manchester City Council 33. Walsall Borough Council 16. North Tyneside Borough Council 34. Wigan Borough Council 17. Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council 35. Wirral Borough Council 18. Oldham Borough Council 36. Wolverhampton City Council London boroughs (32) 1. Barking and Dagenham 17. Hounslow 2. Barnet 18. Islington 3. Bexley 19. Kensington and Chelsea 4. Brent 20. Kingston upon Thames 5. Bromley 21. Lambeth 6. Camden 22. Lewisham 7. Croydon 23. Merton 8. Ealing 24. Newham 9. Enfield 25. Redbridge 10. Greenwich 26. Richmond upon Thames 11. Hackney 27. Southwark 12. Hammersmith and Fulham 28. Sutton 13. Haringey 29. Tower Hamlets 14.
    [Show full text]
  • East Cambridgeshire Objectively Assessed Housing Need October 2016
    East Cambridgeshire Objectively Assessed Housing Need October 2016 Establishing future need for housing A report by Cambridgeshire County Council Research Group to support East Cambridgeshire District Council in objectively assessing and evidencing development needs for housing, both market and affordable. Executive Summary 1. “The primary purpose of identifying need is to identify the future quantity of housing needed, including a breakdown by type, tenure and size.” Source: Planning Practice Guidance Reference ID: 2a-002-20140306 2. The purpose of this report is to identify the future quantity of housing needed, from 2014 to 2036. 3. The overall housing figure that has been identified is 12,900 dwellings (586 dwellings per annum). 4. This housing figure results from applying an upward adjustment to the starting point estimate of overall housing need over the 2014 to 2036 period, to bring the population and households in 2036 to the levels suggested by the official 2012-based projections. 5. The purpose of this report is also to consider the total need for affordable housing in the context of the overall housing figure. 6. The total need for affordable housing that has been calculated is 2,854 houses for 2014-2036. 7. Table 1 provides a summary of the identified change in population, jobs and dwellings numbers for the period 2014 to 2036. Table 1: Identified population, jobs and dwellings change from 2014 to 2036 for East Cambridgeshire District Population Jobs Dwellings Ratio of new jobs to new dwellings East Cambridgeshire 24,400 6,900 12,900 0.5 8. The overall housing figure that has been identified is 4% higher than the CLG 2012 estimate of 12,440 dwellings (12,050 households) and 33% higher than the CLG 2014 estimate of 9,730 dwellings (9,420 households).
    [Show full text]
  • Help to Heat Local Authority Flexible Eligibility Statement of Intent
    APPENDIX 2 Energy Company Obligation: Help to Heat Local Authority Flexible Eligibility Statement of Intent On behalf of Action on Energy Cambridgeshire including: Cambridge City Council, East Cambridgeshire District Council, Fenland District Council, Huntingdonshire District Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council. Date of publication: **TBC** Version: 1.4 URL: [insert webpage SOI has been published on] 1) Introduction 1.1. Fuel poverty in England is measured using the Low Income High Costs (LIHC) indicator, which considers a household to be fuel poor if: they have required fuel costs that are above average (the national median level); and were they to spend that amount, they would be left with a residual income below the official poverty line.1 1.2. Nationally the 2015 figures for England estimate that 2.5 million households suffer from fuel poverty, 11% the total.2 Living in a cold home doubles the risk of respiratory problems in children; increases the risk of minor illnesses; exacerbates existing conditions such as arthritis and is associated with 3 times the level of excess winter deaths as the warmest homes.3 1.3. Action on Energy Cambridgeshire is a collective of the city and district councils that work together for mutual benefit in addressing fuel poverty. We welcome the introduction of Flexible Eligibility as part of the Energy Company Obligation (ECO) as it will allow us to support additional vulnerable households under broader criteria. 1.4. Fuel Poverty is a serious concern in our county and affects over 19,000 households4 contributing to more than 800 Excess Winter Deaths on average each year.5 Although our collective actions helped reduce fuel poverty across the county by an estimated 1468 households from 2013-2015 however there is still more to be done.
    [Show full text]
  • South Cambridgeshire District Council Report To
    SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT TO: Environmental Services Portfolio Holder 17 January 2012 AUTHOR/S: Executive Director (Operational Services) / Legal and Democratic Services Manager MEMBER DEVELOPMENT UPDATE Purpose 1. To update the Portfolio Holder on the Member Development Programme. This is not a key decision, but is a standing item on the Portfolio Holder’s meeting agenda. Recommendation 2. That the Portfolio Holder note the report. Background 3. Recent key dates for Member Development: (a) 10 August 2010: Environmental Services Portfolio Holder established cross- party Member Development Task and Finish Group; (b) 10 November 2010: signed commitment to achieve Quality Charter Status for Elected Member Development within the next three years; (c) 14 April 2011: Member Development Strategy 2011-2014 adopted by Council; (d) 10 November 2011: Organisational Development Strategy adopted by Cabinet; (e) 15 November 2011: Environmental Services Portfolio Holder agreed Quality Charter Status assessment visit for Tuesday 24 January 2012. Considerations 4. The Member Charter Status assessment visit will take place one week after the Portfolio Holder’s meeting and recent member development work has focussed on this. The Council’s portfolio of documentary evidence has been submitted to the assessment team and briefing sessions for those councillors and officers to be interviewed have been held on 12 and 16 January 2012. South East Employers, the organisation which conducts the assessment and awards Charter Status, intends to provide
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Collection Commitment Signatories
    Signatories to the Waste Collection Commitment North East Eastern Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council Peterborough City Council Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council Fenland District Council Hartlepool Borough Council Tendring District Council Darlington Borough Council Maldon District Council Gateshead Council Colchester Borough Council Durham Council Chelmsford Borough Council Middlesbrough Council Castle Point Borough Council North Tyneside Borough Council Braintree District Council North Norfolk District Council North West St Edmundsbury Borough Council Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Forest Heath District Council Hyndburn Borough Council Central Bedfordshire Council Fylde Borough Council South Cambridgeshire District Council Blackburn with Darwen Council Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Cheshire East Council Dacorum Borough Council Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council Broadland District Council Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council Hertsmere Borough Council Wyre Borough Council South Ribble Borough Council East Midlands Stockport Council Chesterfield Borough Council North West Leicestershire District Council West Midlands Charnwood Borough Council Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council Blaby District Council Stratford-on-Avon District Council West Lindsey District Council Shropshire Council North Kesteven District Council Wolverhampton City Council South Holland District Council Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council Boston Borough Council Lichfield District Council South Kesteven District Council Stafford Borough Council Lincoln City
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations - Eastern Region
    Final recommendations - Eastern region Contents 1. Initial proposals overview p1 6. Sub-region 1: Bedfordshire p10, recommendations p11 2. Number of representations received p3 7. Sub-region 2: Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire and Norfolk Cambridgeshire p12, recommendations p13 Hertfordshire p14, recommendations p15 Norfolk p15, recommendations p16 3. Campaigns p4 8. Sub-region 3: Essex p17, recommendations p18 4. Major issues p5 9. Sub-region 4: Suffolk p19, recommendations p20 5. Final proposals recommendations p7 Appendix A Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The Eastern region was allocated 57 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of one from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub-regions: Table 1A - Constituency allocation Sub-region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Bedfordshire 6 6 6 Cambridgeshire, 27 27 27 Hertfordshire and Norfolk Essex 18 17 17 Suffolk 7 7 7 2. Under the initial proposals six of the existing 58 constituencies were completely unchanged. The revised proposals continued to retain six of the existing constituencies unchanged. Under both sets of proposals it was proposed to have two constituencies that crossed county boundaries - one between Cambridgeshire and Norfolk, and one between Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire. In Suffolk, Bedfordshire and Essex it was possible to allocate a whole number of constituencies to each county. 1 3. In response to the consultation on the initial proposals and secondary consultation the Commission received over 2,000 representations regarding the Eastern region. These representations commented on most parts of the region, with the main issues being: ● The proposed constituency of North East Hertfordshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Drinking Water 2013 Private Water Supplies in England July 2014 a Report by the Chief Inspector of Drinking Water
    Drinking water 2013 Private water supplies in England July 2014 A report by the Chief Inspector of Drinking Water Drinking Water Inspectorate | Nobel House, 17 Smith Square | London | SW1P 3JR | Tel: 0300 068 6400 www.dwi.gov.uk Drinking water 2013 Private water supplies in England 1 Published by Drinking Water Inspectorate Area 7E C/o Nobel House 9, Millbank London SW 1P 3GE Tel: 0300 068 6400 Website: http://www.dwi.gov.uk © Crown Copyright 2014 ISBN: 978-1-905852-85-7 Copyright in the typographical arrangement and design rests with the Crown. This publication (excluding the logo) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright with the title and source of the publication specified. 2 Contents Chapter 1: Summary 4 Chapter 2: Number and nature of private water supplies in England 10 Chapter 3: Improving private water supplies 21 3.1: Risk assessments 21 3.2: Risk management 24 3.3: Risk management case studies 28 Chapter 4: Drinking water testing results 69 Annex 1: Numbers of supplies, risk assessments and evidence of monitoring and enforcement. 85 Annex 2: Summary of monitoring data for England and Wales 105 Annex 3: Guidance and technical advice 107 Annex 4: Enquiries about private water supplies handled by the Inspectorate 109 Annex 5: Glossary and description of standards 110 3 Chapter 1: Summary Chapter 1: Introduces the reader to the report and its contents. Summarises changes in numbers of private supplies Puts the quality of private supplies in context relat ive to public supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • FENLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN CORE STRATEGY PROPOSED SUBMISSION This Response Is Written on Behalf of the Middle Level
    FENLAND DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN CORE STRATEGY PROPOSED SUBMISSION This response is written on behalf of the Middle Level Commissioners (MLC) and our associated Internal Drainage Boards (IDBs) within the Fenland District Council area. The MLC are a flood risk management authority and a statutory navigation authority, while the IDBs are flood risk management authorities. The areas of the MLC and the IDBs are classed as defended flood plain and require a complex system of water management to reduce the risk of flooding. Even where the development itself may not be at flood risk, the nature of the geography means that risks may still be caused/created to other land and properties if proper and sufficient account is not taken of flood risk. The MLC and IDBs have also commented both in writing and in discussions with officers of Fenland District Council on previous drafts of this Strategy. We are pleased to note that many of our comments have been taken on board and included within the Strategy now out for consultation. The following comments of the MLC and IDBs are therefore made against this background. 1 It is noted that the Strategy proposes a Vision up to 2031. It is unclear to what extent any impacts of climate change will be noticeable at this time but it is believed that later plans will be better placed to take account of these. It is noted that the Vision does propose 11000 new houses to be built on the edge of the existing towns. Bearing in mind the flood risk presently to the District, the location of and method of drainage of these properties will require very careful planning and consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge: Closing the Gap
    Cambridge: Closing the Gap An independent report prepared by Centre for Cities on Cambridge’s economy presented to Cambridge City Council, Cambridgeshire County Council, Cambridgeshire Horizons, the Greater Cambridge Partnership and the East of England Development Agency March 2009 Lena Tochtermann Introduction Cambridge is a Partner City in the Centre for Cities research programme ‘Unlocking City Potential and Sustaining City Growth’. The programme works closely with a small group of cities to inform economic development strategies and improve economic performance. This report looks at how housing, transport and the economy interact and sets out policy analysis and recommendations in response to three principal questions: • What is the impact of Cambridge’s growth on the wider economy? • How can transport be used to support sustainable economic growth in Cambridge? • How can housing policy in Cambridge help to overcome affordability challenges and support sustainable economic growth? Cambridge’s Sectoral profile (2007) Cambridge Great Britain Manufacturing Manufacturing Other services 1.6% 4.5% Other services 2.3% 10.6% Construction 1.8% Construction 4.9% Wholesale activities 2.1% Wholesale activities 4.2% Retail & leisure Public administration, Public administration, 18.5% education & health education & health 43.8% 26.9% Retail & leisure 22.1% Transport & communication 3.1% Agriculture & energy 0.3% Transport & communication 5.9% Research, architecture & Financial & Related office services Agriculture & energy Business Services 6.1% 1.6% Research, architecture & Financial & Related 15.7% office services Business Services 8.4% 15.6% Source: Nomis, Annual Business Inquiry (2009) for 2007 data Key recommendations Cambridge is a key economic driver for the wider region and an asset for the UK as a whole, attracting investment in knowledge intensive industries that otherwise might not have come to the UK at all.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Ely
    1 Contents About this document 4 Introduction 5 A vision for Ely 6 Area of focus 1: Station gateway 16 Area of focus 2: City Centre 20 Area of focus 3: Connectivity 25 Implementation Plan 29 3 About this document This document has been commissioned by the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority (CPCA), working in partnership with East Cambridgeshire District Council. This Market Town Plan is a series of living documents, owned and updated by local partners including the District Council and the Combined Authority. The devolution deal which created the combined authority recognises the important role of market town economies in growing the wider Cambridgeshire and Peterborough economy. A masterplan for each of the eleven market towns across the region provides the opportunity to look at the unique features of each town, and offers deliverables which will benefit the immediate and wider economy. This Market Town Plan for Ely endorses Mayor James Palmer’s target for the combined authority region to double its Gross Value Added (GVA) over the next twenty-five years. To achieve this, market town economies must ‘do their bit’ – the interventions outlined in this document have been selected for the purpose of achieving this. We don’t expect everything in this document to be funded immediately. There are some quick wins where an injection of funding can get things moving. For other projects, we will need to spend time developing detailed plans and compelling investment cases before we can begin to leverage in funding. While the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority (CPCA) has funded this report, and is keen to invest in our city, we know we will need to build a coalition of supporters, including central government, to get some of the schemes detailed here delivered.
    [Show full text]
  • Fenland District Council Planning Department Fenland Hall County Road March 7Th May 2021 Our Ref 20-2072 Your Ref F/YR11/0832/EXTIME (F/YR07/0916/F)
    Fenland District Council Planning Department Fenland Hall County Road March 7th May 2021 Our Ref 20-2072 Your Ref F/YR11/0832/EXTIME (F/YR07/0916/F) Dear Sirs Residential development at Hockland Road, Tydd St Giles Please find attached a non-material amendment application for the above. Our client Fountain Construction has recently purchased the site and wishes to make a few changes with the design. Essentially the footprint and positioning of the dwellings will be as approved, with just some changes to the internal layout and elevations of the properties and garages, including rooms in the roof space to some. We had intended to deal with this via a Section 73 application to vary the plans referred to as part of the approval, however no plans are listed on the approval. After discussing this with Alison Hoffman she suggested we should submit a non-material amendment application to have a plan schedule added to the conditions. The approved plans that require listing are as follows; 3064/P01-D – Site and Location Plan 3064/P02 – House Type 1 Plans 3064/P03 – House Type 2 Plans 3064/P04 – Garage Plans Villeneuve Basin Road Outwell Norfolk Registered company address PE14 8TQ ANGLIA BUILDING CONSULTANTS LIMITED Bankside 300, Peachman Way, Broadland Business Park 01945 772550 Norwich, Norfolk, NR7 0LB 01223 969427 Registered in England and Wales Registered Company Number 06161857 [email protected] www.angliabuildingconsultants.co.uk Then submitted as part of the discharge of conditions application F/YR11/3072/COND; 3064/Con/01b – Site Plan 3064/Con/02 - Wall and fence details 3064/Con/03 – Fence details Hopefully you should have all required information to enable validation of the application, however should you require anything else or wish to discuss any aspects of the proposal in anyway do not hesitate to contact me.
    [Show full text]
  • East Cambridgeshire Local Plan Examination: Inspector’S Matters, Issues, and Questions for Discussion at the Examination Hearings
    East Cambridgeshire Local Plan Examination: Inspector’s Matters, Issues, and Questions for Discussion at the Examination Hearings Representations: Lichfields on behalf of Gladman Developments Limited Date: 22 May 2018 Our ref: 16168/MS/BHa Subject Matter 3: Objectively Assessed Needs for Housing and Employment Land Issue 1: Whether the Council’s approach to calculating its full, objectively assessed needs is justified, based on up-to-date and reliable evidence, effective, positively prepared, and consistent with national policy? 1.0 Objectively Assessed Need 20. What is the implication of there being a different time period for housing need and employment growth? What is the justification? 1.1 The Council uses different time periods for housing need (2016 to 2036) and employment growth (2014 to 2036). It is clear that this inconsistency in base date has arisen because ‘late in the day’ the Council has chosen to use the proposed draft ‘standard method’ as an assessment of housing need, which has a base date of 2016, rather than its OAN from PE6 which has a base date of 2014. The Council appears to have offered no justification for the application of different time dates. The Vision for the plan is forward looking and appears to overlook the inconsistency in the base date of the delivery of housing and jobs in the District stating that: “In 2036, we will have built a better East Cambridgeshire, accommodating the development of 10,835 new homes and 6,000 jobs”. 1.2 The delivery of housing and jobs are inherently linked in any given location and para 158 of the NPPF requires strategies for them to be integrated.
    [Show full text]