DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX 2 Schedule of Representation Responses and Main Issues in Consultation Document Order

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX 2 Schedule of Representation Responses and Main Issues in Consultation Document Order APPENDIX 2 Schedule of Representation Responses and Main Issues in Consultation Document Order Paragraph Number General Comment ID CILPDCS64 Consultee Name and Housebuilders Consortium Consultee ID 647103 Organisation Agent Name and Organisation Mr Tom Fraser Agent ID 646541 Savills L & P Comments There are a number of matters which need to be addressed in the Draft Charging Schedule, notably Greater clarity and transparency is needed in regard to how the list of infrastructure has been arrived at, how the costs have been calculated and the potential sources of funding; Review of the infrastructure list to ensure there is no double charging and that all elements included comply with the legal definition of infrastructure; Outline the necessary supporting documentation to ensure the effective implementation and operation of CIL (for example policy on relief and instalments). Outline a draft Regulation 123 List for Infrastructure which appropriately balances the infrastructure needed to support development (for example greater funding toward highways and community measures directly associated with planned growth). Provide clarity on whether administration costs have been factored into the CIL rate and whether this is in the spirit of the Regulations and CLG guidance. These matters would help nurture confidence with the implementation of CIL. In addition, it is strongly recommended that in pursuing CIL the Borough Council: Permits relief (which HBC has acknowledged it will do) Re-runs the viability models with our assumptions Outlines a workable instalments policy based on site build out rates and not time Permits payments in kind to avoid strategic Greenfield sites effectively paying double. Main Issues • Need to review infrastructure planning evidence base • Set out a list of what infrastructure CIL will be spent on (Regulation 123 List) • An exceptional circumstances policy should be implemented • Instalments policy should be based on build out rates rather than time • Payments in kind should be permitted • No double counting of infrastructure Paragraph Number General Comment ID CILPDCS72 Consultee Name and McCarthy & Stone Retirement Consultee ID 646846 Organisation Lifestyles Ltd Agent Name and Organisation Mr David Williams Agent ID 497305 The Planning Bureau Ltd Comments In respect to future planning policy the Strategy is clear as to the level of importance to be given to an ageing society, stating; 'Recent reforms to the planning system require regional and local plans to take proper account of ageing and the needs of older people. Future planning policy reform will reflect the high priority we are giving to the challenge of ageing.' It is considered that in light of the Government Strategy guidance that it is appropriate for the Community Infrastructure Levy to have regard to this objective. My Client's response to the preliminary draft charging schedule on the introduction of the Community Infrastructure Levy are based on meeting the Government's objective, set out in the National Strategy, to ensure that sufficient specialist housing is delivered to meet the growing needs of an ageing population. Main Issues • Specialist older persons housing should be treated differently from normal residential development Paragraph Number General Comment ID CILPDCS101 Consultee Name and Mr Dominic Lawson Consultee ID 489173 Organisation Threadneedle Pensions Ltd Agent Name and Organisation Mr Dominic Lawson Agent ID 478925 Dominic Lawson Bespoke Planning Ltd Comments Threadneedle has an interest in responding to Chelmsford Borough Councils consultation on the Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule for the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) as a major landowner in the Borough, ie. the Boreham Airfield site that lies partly within the North Chelmsford Area Action Plan (NCAAP) area. The site is currently being worked for gravel extraction and also includes other buildings in use by the police and ambulance services Threadneedle is concerned to ensure that the proposed levy is robustly justified and viable in all circumstances, and would be happy to participate in any future workshops to contribute its experience and expertise. Main Issues • CIL rates must be justified and viable Paragraph Number General Comment ID CILPDCS106 Consultee Name and Mrs Sue Bull Consultee ID 311100 Organisation Anglian Water Agent Name and Organisation Agent ID Comments I would not expect there to be provision within the CIL for wastewater infrastructure. We would be pleased to engage in further discussion should you want to give further consideration to wastewater infrastructure inclusion. Main Issues • Wastewater infrastructure is not expected to funded through CIL Paragraph Number General Comment ID CILPDCS111 Consultee Name and Mrs Elisabeth Blyth Consultee ID 308536 Organisation Danbury Parish Council Agent Name and Organisation Agent ID Comments Danbury Parish Council has no comments to make at this stage. Main Issues • None 2 Paragraph Number General Comment ID CILPDCS112 Consultee Name and Mr Glenn Whellams Consultee ID 309629 Organisation Essex County Fire & Rescue Service Agent Name and Organisation Agent ID Comments No observations to make at this time. Main Issues • None Paragraph Number 1.4 Comment ID CILPDCS91 Consultee Name and Inland Homes Ltd Consultee ID 648111 Organisation Agent Name and Organisation Mr Matt Corcoran Agent ID 647087 Inland Homes Comments We are grateful for the opportunity to comment on this Preliminary Drafting Schedule. However, paragraph 1.4 states that a Developer forum took place within the months of November and December 2011. Inland Homes were not invited to either presentation which is very disappointing given our site ownership status of the strategic St Johns Hospital site and the pre application commentary we were receiving during these months. Main Issues • Pre-consultation should have been wider Paragraph Number 2.2 Comment ID CILPDCS61 Consultee Name and Housebuilders Consortium Consultee ID 647103 Organisation Agent Name and Organisation Mr Tom Fraser Agent ID 646541 Savills L & P Comments Greater clarity is needed regarding the items which the Council considers will be funded through S106. At present, the uncertainty makes it difficult to assess the impact of CIL. Main Issues • Set out a list of what infrastructure CIL will be spent on (Regulation 123 List) Paragraph Number 2.2 Comment ID CILPDCS97 Consultee Name and Mr Keith Blackburn Consultee ID 311146 Organisation Essex County Council Agent Name and Organisation Agent ID Comments Para 2.2: - This should make it clear that pooling of up to five planning obligations/financial contributions will remain acceptable Main Issues • Clarification on future pooling of Section 106 contributions required 3 Paragraph Number 2.6 Comment ID CILPDCS28 Consultee Name and Mr Gary Duncan Consultee ID 488925 Organisation Countryside Properties PLC Agent Name and Organisation Agent ID Comments We welcome the clarity expressed at para. 2.6 that proposals with planning permission will not be liable for CIL; also that applications for the approval of reserved matters will be exempt. Main Issues • Developments with planning permission are not liable for CIL Paragraph Number 2.7 Comment ID CILPDCS23 Consultee Name and Persimmon Homes Essex Consultee ID 646628 Organisation Agent Name and Organisation Mrs Gabrielle Rowan Agent ID 396131 Pegasus Planning Group Comments Additional clarification is required from the Council in relation to what will be funded by CIL and what will still be included in the site-specific Section 106 agreements. It is necessary to ensure that there is no double counting in relation to education provision or healthcare provision. If these are to be included within strategic projects it should be made clear that additional financial contributions will not be requested for the provision of these as part of any Section 106 agreement. In paragraph 2.7, it is clear that where a new school or new healthcare provision is required as a direct result of a development, these will not be covered by CIL but included as part of the site-specific Section 106. However, the costs associated with the provision of this strategic infrastructureshould be taken into account when calculating the level of CIL required for such a development resulting in a possible reduction in CIL taking into account the significant site-specific improvements. Main Issues • Set out a list of what infrastructure CIL will be spent on to ensure no double counting (Regulation 123 List) • Site related infrastructure should be taken into account when setting the CIL Paragraph Number 2.7 Comment ID CILPDCS29 Consultee Name and Mr Gary Duncan Consultee ID 488925 Organisation Countryside Properties PLC Agent Name and Organisation Agent ID Comments We also welcome the on-going role that Section106 agreements will have in dealing with site-related infrastructure (paras. 2.2 and 2.7 refer). Main Issues • Welcome on-going role of Section 106 4 Paragraph Number 2.8 Comment ID CILPDCS55 Consultee Name and Housebuilders Consortium Consultee ID 647103 Organisation Agent Name and Organisation Mr Tom Fraser Agent ID 646541 Savills L & P Comments With regard to the relationship with Section 106 the CIL Charging Schedule should be clear that double counting of Section 106 contributions and CIL is not permitted by law The key tests of CIL Regulation 122 should be outlined within the supporting documentation. In practical terms, owing to the need to publish a Regulation 123 List, it is likely that only site specific
Load more

Recommended publications
  • East Cambridgeshire Objectively Assessed Housing Need October 2016
    East Cambridgeshire Objectively Assessed Housing Need October 2016 Establishing future need for housing A report by Cambridgeshire County Council Research Group to support East Cambridgeshire District Council in objectively assessing and evidencing development needs for housing, both market and affordable. Executive Summary 1. “The primary purpose of identifying need is to identify the future quantity of housing needed, including a breakdown by type, tenure and size.” Source: Planning Practice Guidance Reference ID: 2a-002-20140306 2. The purpose of this report is to identify the future quantity of housing needed, from 2014 to 2036. 3. The overall housing figure that has been identified is 12,900 dwellings (586 dwellings per annum). 4. This housing figure results from applying an upward adjustment to the starting point estimate of overall housing need over the 2014 to 2036 period, to bring the population and households in 2036 to the levels suggested by the official 2012-based projections. 5. The purpose of this report is also to consider the total need for affordable housing in the context of the overall housing figure. 6. The total need for affordable housing that has been calculated is 2,854 houses for 2014-2036. 7. Table 1 provides a summary of the identified change in population, jobs and dwellings numbers for the period 2014 to 2036. Table 1: Identified population, jobs and dwellings change from 2014 to 2036 for East Cambridgeshire District Population Jobs Dwellings Ratio of new jobs to new dwellings East Cambridgeshire 24,400 6,900 12,900 0.5 8. The overall housing figure that has been identified is 4% higher than the CLG 2012 estimate of 12,440 dwellings (12,050 households) and 33% higher than the CLG 2014 estimate of 9,730 dwellings (9,420 households).
    [Show full text]
  • Help to Heat Local Authority Flexible Eligibility Statement of Intent
    APPENDIX 2 Energy Company Obligation: Help to Heat Local Authority Flexible Eligibility Statement of Intent On behalf of Action on Energy Cambridgeshire including: Cambridge City Council, East Cambridgeshire District Council, Fenland District Council, Huntingdonshire District Council and South Cambridgeshire District Council. Date of publication: **TBC** Version: 1.4 URL: [insert webpage SOI has been published on] 1) Introduction 1.1. Fuel poverty in England is measured using the Low Income High Costs (LIHC) indicator, which considers a household to be fuel poor if: they have required fuel costs that are above average (the national median level); and were they to spend that amount, they would be left with a residual income below the official poverty line.1 1.2. Nationally the 2015 figures for England estimate that 2.5 million households suffer from fuel poverty, 11% the total.2 Living in a cold home doubles the risk of respiratory problems in children; increases the risk of minor illnesses; exacerbates existing conditions such as arthritis and is associated with 3 times the level of excess winter deaths as the warmest homes.3 1.3. Action on Energy Cambridgeshire is a collective of the city and district councils that work together for mutual benefit in addressing fuel poverty. We welcome the introduction of Flexible Eligibility as part of the Energy Company Obligation (ECO) as it will allow us to support additional vulnerable households under broader criteria. 1.4. Fuel Poverty is a serious concern in our county and affects over 19,000 households4 contributing to more than 800 Excess Winter Deaths on average each year.5 Although our collective actions helped reduce fuel poverty across the county by an estimated 1468 households from 2013-2015 however there is still more to be done.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations - Eastern Region
    Final recommendations - Eastern region Contents 1. Initial proposals overview p1 6. Sub-region 1: Bedfordshire p10, recommendations p11 2. Number of representations received p3 7. Sub-region 2: Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire and Norfolk Cambridgeshire p12, recommendations p13 Hertfordshire p14, recommendations p15 Norfolk p15, recommendations p16 3. Campaigns p4 8. Sub-region 3: Essex p17, recommendations p18 4. Major issues p5 9. Sub-region 4: Suffolk p19, recommendations p20 5. Final proposals recommendations p7 Appendix A Initial/revised proposals overview 1. The Eastern region was allocated 57 constituencies under the initial and revised proposals, a reduction of one from the existing allocation. In formulating the initial and revised proposals the Commission decided to construct constituencies using the following sub-regions: Table 1A - Constituency allocation Sub-region Existing allocation Allocation under initial Allocation under revised proposals proposals Bedfordshire 6 6 6 Cambridgeshire, 27 27 27 Hertfordshire and Norfolk Essex 18 17 17 Suffolk 7 7 7 2. Under the initial proposals six of the existing 58 constituencies were completely unchanged. The revised proposals continued to retain six of the existing constituencies unchanged. Under both sets of proposals it was proposed to have two constituencies that crossed county boundaries - one between Cambridgeshire and Norfolk, and one between Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire. In Suffolk, Bedfordshire and Essex it was possible to allocate a whole number of constituencies to each county. 1 3. In response to the consultation on the initial proposals and secondary consultation the Commission received over 2,000 representations regarding the Eastern region. These representations commented on most parts of the region, with the main issues being: ● The proposed constituency of North East Hertfordshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge: Closing the Gap
    Cambridge: Closing the Gap An independent report prepared by Centre for Cities on Cambridge’s economy presented to Cambridge City Council, Cambridgeshire County Council, Cambridgeshire Horizons, the Greater Cambridge Partnership and the East of England Development Agency March 2009 Lena Tochtermann Introduction Cambridge is a Partner City in the Centre for Cities research programme ‘Unlocking City Potential and Sustaining City Growth’. The programme works closely with a small group of cities to inform economic development strategies and improve economic performance. This report looks at how housing, transport and the economy interact and sets out policy analysis and recommendations in response to three principal questions: • What is the impact of Cambridge’s growth on the wider economy? • How can transport be used to support sustainable economic growth in Cambridge? • How can housing policy in Cambridge help to overcome affordability challenges and support sustainable economic growth? Cambridge’s Sectoral profile (2007) Cambridge Great Britain Manufacturing Manufacturing Other services 1.6% 4.5% Other services 2.3% 10.6% Construction 1.8% Construction 4.9% Wholesale activities 2.1% Wholesale activities 4.2% Retail & leisure Public administration, Public administration, 18.5% education & health education & health 43.8% 26.9% Retail & leisure 22.1% Transport & communication 3.1% Agriculture & energy 0.3% Transport & communication 5.9% Research, architecture & Financial & Related office services Agriculture & energy Business Services 6.1% 1.6% Research, architecture & Financial & Related 15.7% office services Business Services 8.4% 15.6% Source: Nomis, Annual Business Inquiry (2009) for 2007 data Key recommendations Cambridge is a key economic driver for the wider region and an asset for the UK as a whole, attracting investment in knowledge intensive industries that otherwise might not have come to the UK at all.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Ely
    1 Contents About this document 4 Introduction 5 A vision for Ely 6 Area of focus 1: Station gateway 16 Area of focus 2: City Centre 20 Area of focus 3: Connectivity 25 Implementation Plan 29 3 About this document This document has been commissioned by the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority (CPCA), working in partnership with East Cambridgeshire District Council. This Market Town Plan is a series of living documents, owned and updated by local partners including the District Council and the Combined Authority. The devolution deal which created the combined authority recognises the important role of market town economies in growing the wider Cambridgeshire and Peterborough economy. A masterplan for each of the eleven market towns across the region provides the opportunity to look at the unique features of each town, and offers deliverables which will benefit the immediate and wider economy. This Market Town Plan for Ely endorses Mayor James Palmer’s target for the combined authority region to double its Gross Value Added (GVA) over the next twenty-five years. To achieve this, market town economies must ‘do their bit’ – the interventions outlined in this document have been selected for the purpose of achieving this. We don’t expect everything in this document to be funded immediately. There are some quick wins where an injection of funding can get things moving. For other projects, we will need to spend time developing detailed plans and compelling investment cases before we can begin to leverage in funding. While the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority (CPCA) has funded this report, and is keen to invest in our city, we know we will need to build a coalition of supporters, including central government, to get some of the schemes detailed here delivered.
    [Show full text]
  • East Cambridgeshire Local Plan Examination: Inspector’S Matters, Issues, and Questions for Discussion at the Examination Hearings
    East Cambridgeshire Local Plan Examination: Inspector’s Matters, Issues, and Questions for Discussion at the Examination Hearings Representations: Lichfields on behalf of Gladman Developments Limited Date: 22 May 2018 Our ref: 16168/MS/BHa Subject Matter 3: Objectively Assessed Needs for Housing and Employment Land Issue 1: Whether the Council’s approach to calculating its full, objectively assessed needs is justified, based on up-to-date and reliable evidence, effective, positively prepared, and consistent with national policy? 1.0 Objectively Assessed Need 20. What is the implication of there being a different time period for housing need and employment growth? What is the justification? 1.1 The Council uses different time periods for housing need (2016 to 2036) and employment growth (2014 to 2036). It is clear that this inconsistency in base date has arisen because ‘late in the day’ the Council has chosen to use the proposed draft ‘standard method’ as an assessment of housing need, which has a base date of 2016, rather than its OAN from PE6 which has a base date of 2014. The Council appears to have offered no justification for the application of different time dates. The Vision for the plan is forward looking and appears to overlook the inconsistency in the base date of the delivery of housing and jobs in the District stating that: “In 2036, we will have built a better East Cambridgeshire, accommodating the development of 10,835 new homes and 6,000 jobs”. 1.2 The delivery of housing and jobs are inherently linked in any given location and para 158 of the NPPF requires strategies for them to be integrated.
    [Show full text]
  • East Cambridgeshire
    EAST CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL THE GRANGE, NUTHOLT LANE, ELY, CAMBRIDGESHIRE CB7 4EE Telephone: Ely (01353) 665555 DX41001 ELY Fax: (01353) 665240 www.eastcambs.gov.uk Further to your information request FOI/EIR 20/21-056 please find your question and our response below. Request: Please provide copies of all communication between councillors and/or officers of East Cambridgeshire District Council, and to or from councillors and/or officers of East Cambridgeshire District Council and the Mayor of Cambridgeshire & Peterborough and/or members and/or officers of the Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Combined Authority relating to the use, occupation, ownership, or leasing of the current or former Citizens Advice office in Market Street Ely. Response: No information is held. The office was leased to Cambridgeshire Rural Advice Service until the Council received a notice to end the lease in March 2020. It was updated to Council on 21 May 2020 that Officers have instructed a valuation in preparation for marketing 70 Market Street, Ely in due course. This concludes your request FOI/EIR 20/21-056 If information has been refused please treat this as a Refusal Notice for the purposes of the Act. If you disagree with our decision or are otherwise unhappy with how we have dealt with your request in the first instance you may approach [email protected] and request a review. A request for review must be made in no more than 40 working days from the date of your this email. Should you remain dissatisfied with the outcome you have a right under s50 of the Freedom of Information Act to appeal against the decision by contacting the Information Commissioner, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow SK9 5AF.
    [Show full text]
  • LHNA Sept 2020 (PDF 8.52Mb)
    South West Hertfordshire Local Housing Needs Assessment On behalf of Dacorum, Hertsmere, St. Albans, Three Rivers and Watford Councils September 2020 Prepared by GL Hearn 65 Gresham Street London EC2V 7NQ T +44 (0)20 7851 4900 glhearn.com South West Hertfordshire Local Housing Needs Assessment, September 2020 Contents Section Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 1 INTRODUCTION 14 2 DEMOGRAPHIC GROWTH AND HOUSING NEED 22 3 ECONOMIC LED HOUSING NEED 37 4 MARKET SIGNALS 48 5 AFFORDABLE HOUSING NEED 69 6 HOUSING MIX 116 7 HOUSING NEEDS OF OLDER AND DISABLED PERSONS 142 8 HOUSING NEEDS OF DIFFERENT GROUPS 169 9 HOUSING DELIVERY 185 Appendices APPENDIX A: DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS 193 APPENDIX B: COST AND AFFORDABILITY ANALYSIS BY LOCAL AUTHORITY 211 APPENDIX C: CHANGE IN HOUSEHOLD TYPES AT A LOCAL AUTHORITY LEVEL 214 APPENDIX D: AVERAGE BEDROOM BY AGE AND TENURE 217 APPENDIX E: CHANGE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY AGE OF HOUSEHOLD REFERENCE PERSONS FOR EACH LOCAL AUTHORITIES 220 APPENDIX F: OLDER PERSONS’ ACCOMMODATION – RECENT PLANNING DECISIONS 223 GL Hearn Page 2 of 227 J:\Planning\Job Files\J039924 - South West Herts - SHMA Update\Report\September 2020 LHNA Clean V3.docx South West Hertfordshire Local Housing Needs Assessment, September 2020 Quality Standards Control The signatories below verify that this document has been prepared in accordance with our quality control requirements. These procedures do not affect the content and views expressed by the originator. This document must only be treated as a draft unless it is has been signed by the Originators and approved by a Business or Associate Director. DATE ORIGINATORS APPROVED August 2020 Nena Pavlidou Paul McColgan Senior Planner Director Limitations This document has been prepared for the stated objective and should not be used for any other purpose without the prior written authority of GL Hearn; we accept no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than for which it was commissioned.
    [Show full text]
  • An Independence from Europebritish N Ational Party Christian Peoples Alliance Conservative Party English D Emocrats Green Party
    An Independence from EuropeBritish National Party Christian Peoples Alliance Conservative Party English Democrats Green Party Labour Party Liberal Democrats NO2EU UK Independence Party (UKIP)Total Babergh district 359 123 150 8,235 294 2,698 3,465 1,757 60 9,217 26,358 Basildon Borough Council 877 564 320 10,202 628 2,032 7,301 1,233 147 18,926 42,230 Bedford Borough Council 690 311 474 11,448 323 2,836 9,603 3,266 151 11,470 40,572 Braintree District Council 496 307 210 11,055 585 3,108 5,506 1,458 79 14,641 37,445 Breckland District Council 525 238 327 9,859 285 2,741 4,420 1,211 98 14,393 34,097 Brentwood Borough 369 194 191 7,469 295 1,439 2,349 1,883 37 8,521 22,747 Council Broadland District 447 186 231 10,313 244 3,415 5,288 2,142 78 12,900 35,244 Council Broxbourne Borough 550 273 143 7,209 281 972 3,353 598 77 9,489 22,945 Council Cambridge City Council 315 122 296 5,883 143 7,381 10,356 7,866 110 4,585 37,057 Castle Point Borough 743 346 156 6,159 413 1,151 2,994 439 61 11,391 23,853 Council Central Bedfordshire 1,140 507 487 20,967 657 5,019 9,623 3,534 198 24,509 66,641 Chelmsford City Council 537 234 279 13,714 457 3,162 5,285 3,790 89 16,065 43,612 Colchester Borough 695 294 317 12,680 542 4,543 6,715 5,049 115 14,489 45,439 Council Dacorum Borough 469 247 242 11,688 306 3,222 5,849 2,977 109 11,102 36,211 East Cambridgeshire 307 113 182 6,692 161 2,106 2,552 2,303 47 6,553 21,016 District Council East Hertfordshire 570 255 215 13,343 281 3,253 5,115 2,414 99 11,806 37,351 District Council An Independence from EuropeBritish
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report May 2018
    Interim Report May 2018 www.cpier.org.uk Foreword FROM THE CHAIR OF THE REVIEW, DAME KATE BARKER The Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Independent Economic Review (CPIER) is pleased to present the interim report, which has been led by the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Independent Economic Commission (CPIEC). It is co-funded by the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority, the Business Board of the Combined Authority, and Cambridge Ahead. This is of course the Commission’s report. The views expressed have been developed as independent – as our funders asked us to do. The Commission is now roughly at the half way stage in the review. We have gathered a great deal of evidence. Much of the evidence we have is data on the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough economy. Most of what we have now is from published sources, and we have commissioned a range of new research too. Some of that is available to us now and informs this report. Much of the research is still underway and will be reflected in the final report. At this stage, we have not set out a wholly definitive analysis of where the economy of the area is heading and what should be done about it. This is more our view of where the economy is today and how it got there, an important starting point for the review. While the area the review has responsibility for is defined by its administrative geography, we are primarily concerned with the economics of the area, and we therefore refrain from artificially simplifying, or forcing together, the economic geography.
    [Show full text]
  • London Commuter Belt (West) SHMA Report of Study Findings April 2010
    London Commuter Belt (West) Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2008 Report of Study Findings April 2010 London Commuter Belt (West) Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2008 Opinion Research Services The Strand, Swansea SA1 1AF Jonathan Lee Nigel Moore · Catherine Nock · Hugo Marchant · Chris Broughton enquiries 01792 535300 · [email protected] · www.ors.org.uk © Copyright December 2009 Hertfordshire County Council County Hall, Hertford SG13 8DN Russell Monck (Forward Planning) [email protected] enquiries 01992 555234 Dacorum Borough Council Civic Centre, Marlowes, Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1HH David Pickering (Housing Enabling Officer) [email protected] enquiries 01442 867814 or Nathalie Bateman (Planning Officer) [email protected] enquiries 01442 228526 or 01442 228592 Hertsmere Borough Council Civic Offices, Elstree Way, Borehamwood, WD6 1WA Tina Nyamaah (Affordable Housing Co-ordinator) [email protected] Or Kim Harwood Housing Need and Strategy Manager Tel: 020 8207 2277 Ext 2501 [email protected] enquiries 020 8207 2277 ext 3315 or Andre Sestini (Senior Planning Officer) [email protected] enquiries: 020 8207 7509 St Albans City and District Council Civic Centre, St Peters Street, St Albans, AL1 3JE David Reavill (Development Officer) [email protected] or Linda Middleton (Housing Strategy Manager) [email protected] enquiries 01727 819382 or 01727 819401 Three Rivers District Council Three Rivers House, Northway, Rickmansworth, WD3 1RL Nyack Semelo-Shaw
    [Show full text]
  • Living and Working in the East of England
    Health Education East of England Living and working in the east of England: A guide to our Workforce Recruitment Team Partnership areas T: 0844 894 0179 E:[email protected] @eoeLETB www.eoe.hee.nhs.uk Bordering London, Suffolk, Cambridgeshire, Shopping Hertfordshire, and the North Sea, the county of Essex offers a great experience to live and study in Contents the east of England. London is a short journey ESSEX away, but if you want to get away from the city lights, you can visit one of the many rural villages in Essex ..................................................3 the region or see some of the 350 miles of Norfolk and Suffolk ............................5 coastline; from the famous Southend Pier (the longest pleasure in the world) to the quieter Frinton Cambridgeshire and Peterborough ....7 and Mersea Island in the North of the County. Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire ........11 Where we are ..................................15 Essex is famed for its shopping, and has a number of different locations including the enormous Lakeside shopping centre a. Colchester and Chelmsford also offer a range of different shops and there are plans for further What is Health Education development in Chelmsford. East of England? Stately Homes and Castles Health Education East of England (HEEoE) is the Local Education and Training Board that covers With its Victorian days and the terrifying Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Halloween Ghost Walk, Audley End is a mansion Peterborough, Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex. In April with a difference, and one of England's finest 2013 HEEoE took over responsibility for the country houses. Alternatively, if you want to brush East of England quality of education, training and development in up on your history you can visit on of Essex's the east of England, previously managed by the castles in Hedingham, Colchester and Hadleigh.
    [Show full text]