Local Residents C Submissions to the Birmingham City Council Electoral Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Local Residents C submissions to the Birmingham City Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from local residents with surnames beginning with C. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. 6/21/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Birm ingham District P ersonal Details: Nam e: PHILIP CALCUTT E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e: Comment text: Dear Review Officer, I am writing support the proposed two-Councillor Moseley Ward and to thank you for taking account of all the representations from people who live in Moseley. It positively demonstrates that the views of local people can be used ti improve decisions. We support the Moseley Society’s proposed minor amendments to the new two councillor Moseley Ward. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8408 1/1 6/21/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Birm ingham District P ersonal Details: Nam e: stephen carter E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e: Comment text: I live at please keep as Acocks Green please don't change to Tyseley Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8454 1/1 6/21/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Birm ingham District P ersonal Details: Nam e: stephen carter E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e: Comment text: Ninfield RD Acocks Green B277TS please keep as Acocks Green please don't change to Tyseley Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8453 1/1 8r Hh x A ) Hhr Hvu xhiruhyss rvr Tr) %Er! % %)"# U) 8r Hh x Tiwrp) AX )@yrpviqh vr -----Original Message----- From: Jane Cassidy Sent: 05 June 2016 10:57 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Election boundaries Dear Sir / Madam I live at I understand that the proposed boundary changes may mean that my property would become part of the Quinton ward. This would have a significant impact on my property value and I would therefore strongly request that it remains in the harborne ward and is not changed. Kind regards J V Cassidy 29 8r Hh x A ) Hhr Hvu xhiruhyss rvr Tr) &Er! %()!" U) 8r Hh x Tiwrp) AX )Ch i r7qh From: Rajinder Kaur Chahal Sent: 06 June 2016 20:10 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Harborne Boundary TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN Dear Sirs, Please note that we strongly oppose that the the B17 area should be re‐labelled as Quinton. As residents of Lordswood Road HARBORNE, we feel it should it should remain that way. Why should we accept a reduction in house price as you individuals have nothing better to do than alter geographical boundaries of a well respected area for no valid reason? Please explain. To re‐iterate the point Lorswood Road should remain in Harborne. Regards Chahal Residence 7 5/19/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Birm ingham District P ersonal Details: Nam e: David Chalmers E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e: Comment text: The proposed boundaries are now much better, though with a few small problems in some areas will no doubt be mentioned by others. The main problem now is one which existed in the previous proposal, and absolutely needs to be addressed; that is, the reduction in number of councillors. The fact that Birmingham, with a population of well over a million, will have only two more councillors than Leeds, despite the latter having only three-quarters of the population of the former, is bizarre. If the commission considers that the number of electors per councillor in Leeds 'provides for effective and convenient local government', then how can it also be the case in Birmingham, where the number is far greater? Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8004 1/1 6/21/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Birm ingham District P ersonal Details: Nam e: Hilary Charlton E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e: Comment text: I live in Ninfield Road and strongly object to the proposed change in boundaries. I have only found out about this proposal this evening. Why the change ? What are the advantages to rate payers, if any ? Scrap this now, let common sense prevail . Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8461 1/1 6/21/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Birm ingham District P ersonal Details: Nam e: john Charlton E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e: leave us alone Comment text: We quite like being in Acocks green. I'm not sure tyseley and hay mills has the same ring to it and have you thought how this will affect the LGBT people in the area.Why is this only appearing now 3 days before the biggest decision this country will make since 1975. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8467 1/1 6/21/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Birm ingham District P ersonal Details: Nam e: Imdad Chaudhry E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e: Feature Annotations 11:: KKeeleel DDrive,rive, BBurkeurke AAveve;; aandnd GGreenreen RRoadoad iinn MoMos seley.eley. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. M ap Features: Annotation 1: Keel Drive, Burke Ave; and Green Road in Moseley. Comment text: By taking the boundary along Green Road, a community is being divided. The residents of Keel Drive, Burke Avenue and Green Road are a cohesive community within Moseley. The local boundary aim is to keep communities and services together and this is going against this and against local government guidelines. Our direct link is not with Sparkhill, but with Moseley. Please do not move us into Sparkhill, but leave us in Moseley! Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/8478 1/1 8r Hh x A ) Hhr Hvu xhiruhyss rvr Tr) %Er! % %)"! U) 8r Hh x Tiwrp) AX ) -----Original Message----- From: jay chauhan Sent: 05 June 2016 14:13 To: reviews <[email protected]> Subject: Sent from my iPhone Sir/ Ma'am I wish my property to be in Harborne Ward. I live at I "do not" wish to be in the Quinton Ward. Mr J Chauhan Thank you 36 8r Hh x A ) Shw8uhuh1 hwvpuhuh 5 hupx3 Tr) $Er! %!!) & U) rvr AyyVAyht) Ayy AyhtTh) Ayhttrq Sir/ Ma'am I wish my property to be in Harborne Ward. I live at I "do not" wish to be in the Quinton Ward. Mr R Chauhan Thank you 1 6/21/2016 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Birm ingham District P ersonal Details: Nam e: Vinod Chohan E-m ail: P ostcode: Organisation Nam e: Comment text: Re: Ward Boundary Proposals of -Sarehole Residents of Green Rd, Gracewell Rd, Keel Drive, Burke Avenue The proposals to split half of Green Road and Gracewell Road to be in Moseley Ward; and other half of Green Road, Burke Avenue and Keel Drive to be in Sparkhill Ward.Our Community will be divided inot two. This will lead to split representation at council level and an end to unified council services. Already on the margins of several wards, our access to council wil be further weakend. The Half of GreenRd that will be in Moseley has benefited from theSarehole Residents in achievig what all households in our area said when the survey was carried out earlier this year to be part of Moseley.The proposal to split a community of 42 houses into different wards, around, which is virtually a country lane is not acceptable. The two sides of Green Rd, Burke Avenue and Keel Drive hold community events at times of national celebrations. We all have historical and cultural links to Moseley Village,and similar links to Moseley Bog and Joy's Wood in our neighbourhood. Our connection here are to the schools in Moseley which is St Bernard's Roman Catholic School and Moseley Church of England School; and not to Sparkhill. Those assigned to Sparkhill do not have direct access to Sparkhill; their access is to Moseley.t recreation etc. You can ask families and friends in Moseley Village, itself, for example, if you like, to support our case. Please as we are sure that you are aware that our historical and geographic link has been with Moseley On Saturday, 18 June 2016, 19:01, Kanta Chohan wrote: The proposals to split half of Green Road and Gracewell Road to be in Moseley Ward; and other half of Green Road, Burke Avenue and Keel Drive to be in Sparkhill Ward.Our Community will be divided inot two. This will lead to split representation at council level and an end to unified council services. Already on the margins of several wards, our access to council wil be further weakend. The Half of GreenRd that will be in Moseley has benefited from theSarehole Residents in achievig what all households in our area said when the survey was carried out earlier this year to be part of Moseley.The proposal to split a community of 42 houses into different wards, around, which is virtually a country lane is not acceptable. The two sides of Green Rd, Burke Avenue and Keel Drive hold community events at times of national celebrations. We all have historical and cultural links to Moseley Village,and similar links to Moseley Bog and Joy's Wood in our neighbourhood. Our connection here are to the schools in Moseley which is St Bernard's Roman Catholic School and Moseley Church of England School; and not to Sparkhill.