Arborist Survey Report
Placer Retirement Residence Project
Placer County, California
Prepared For: Kimley-Horn
May 10, 2018
ECORP Consulting, Inc. has assisted public and private land owners with environmental regulation compliance since 1987. We offer full service capability, from initial baseline environmental studies through environmental planning review, permitting negotiation, liaison to obtain legal agreements, mitigation design, and construction monitoring and reporting.
Citation: ECORP Consulting, Inc. 2018. Arborist Survey Report for the Placer Retirement Residence Project, Placer County, California. Prepared for Kimley-Horn. May 10, 2018. Arborist Survey Report for Placer Retirement Residence Project
CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ...... 1 2.1 Roadway Frontage Improvements ...... 3 3.0 METHODS ...... 3 4.0 RESULTS ...... 4 5.0 IMPACTS AND CONCLUSIONS ...... 4 5.1 Full Frontage Improvements Alternative ...... 4 5.2 Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative ...... 7 5.3 Summary...... 9 6.0 REFERENCES ...... 10
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Potential Indirect Impacts for Full Frontage Improvements Alternative ...... 5 Table 2. Proposed Tree Removals for Full Frontage Improvements Alternative ...... 5 Table 3. Potential Indirect Impacts for Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative ...... 7 Table 4. Proposed Tree Removals for Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative ...... 8
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Project Location and Vicinity ...... 2
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A – Tree Inventory at the Placer Community Retirement Residence Project Attachment B – Tree Survey Data (19 August 2016) Attachment C – Representative Site Photographs Attachment D – Proposed Tree Impacts Full Frontage Improvements Alternative Attachment E – Proposed Tree Impacts Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS dbh diameter at breast height Project Placer Retirement Residence Project Tree Preservation Code Placer County Code (Article 12.16.020) for Tree Preservation USGS U.S. Geological Survey
ECORP Consulting, Inc. INTERNAL REVIEW DRAFT i Placer Community Retirement Residence Project 2016-138
Arborist Survey Report for Placer Retirement Residence Project
1.0 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of Kimley-Horn, ECORP Consulting, Inc. conducted an arborist survey for the Placer Retirement Residence Project (Project) site, located in Roseville, Placer County, California. The purpose of this survey was to identify, map, and assess the general condition of trees within the Project site according to the Placer County Code (Article 12.16.020) for Tree Preservation (Tree Preservation Code).
The following are definitions from the Tree Preservation Code that were used to guide the methodology and data collection for this survey effort.
Tree: A tall woody plant native to California, with a single main stem or trunk at least six inches diameter at breast height (dbh), or a multiple trunk with an aggregate of at least ten (10) inches dbh. (Note: Grey pines (Pinus sabiniana) are exempt from this article).
Riparian Zone: Any area within fifty (50) feet from the centerline of a seasonal creek or stream, any area one hundred (100) feet from the centerline of a year-round creek, stream, or river, and any area within one hundred (100) feet from the shoreline of a pond, lake or reservoir. At a minimum all streams, creeks, ponds, lakes, and reservoirs as shown on 7.5-minute U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) maps are included in this definition.
Landmark Tree: A tree or grove of trees designated by resolution of the Board of Supervisors to be of historical or cultural value, an outstanding specimen, an unusual species and/or of significant community benefit. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, a tree that is not native to California may be designated as a landmark tree.
2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The site is located in an unincorporated portion of Placer County at the northwestern corner of the intersection of Sierra College Boulevard and Old Auburn Road (Figure 1. Project Location and Vicinity). The ±9-acre Project site corresponds to a portion of Section 17, Township 10 North, and Range 7 East (Mount Diablo Base and Meridian) of the “Folsom, California” 7.5-minute quadrangle (U.S. Department of the Interior, Geologic Survey [USGS] 1981). The approximate center of the site is located at 38˚ 43’ 23” North and 121° 13’ 37” West within the Lower American Watershed (#18020111, USGS 2016). The Project is located within the Granite Bay community (Assessor’s Parcel Number 468-060-038). The Project site is undeveloped and characterized by nonnative annual grassland, with some riparian habitat along the on- site tributary to Linda Creek. The surrounding lands include residential development to the south, rural residences to the west and north, and a mixture of high- and low-density residential development to the east.
ECORP Consulting, Inc. May 10, 2018 1 Placer Retirement Residence Project 2016-138
7
1
0
2 /
6 /
3
n o n g a w d - )
W
D /
H
M
L ( d x m . 5 1 7 0 6 1 0 2 _ c a 9 _ V n L _ R R C P \ y t i n i c i V _ n o i t a c o
L Project Boundary (9 acres) \ S P A M \ e c n e Placer County, California d i s e
R §17, T.10N, R.07E, MDBM t n
e Latitude (NAD83): 38° 43' 23" N m e r i t Longitude (NAD83): 121° 13' 37" W e R
y Watershed: Lower American (18020111) t n u P o RO C J EC r T e
c Sc ale in Feet a l P
1
6 I 0
- 0 1,000 2,000 6 1 0 2 \
6 Folsom (1981, NAD27) 1 0 2
\ CA 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle : N
:
n US Geological Survey. o i t a c o L Map Date: 3/6/2017 Service Layer Credits: Copyright:© 2015 DeLorme Figure 1. Project Location and Vicinity 2016-138 Placer Retirement Residence Arborist Survey Report for Placer Retirement Residence Project
2.1 Roadway Frontage Improvements
For this Project, two roadway frontage improvements are proposed and their impacts are evaluated separately. The first alternative, the Full Frontage Improvements Alternative, proposes to construct the roadway frontage improvements along Old Auburn Road based on the design requirements required by the Granite Bay Community Plan. The second alternative, the Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative, proposed to shift the existing center line of a portion of Old Auburn Road with the intent of avoiding impacts to the existing Linda Creek tributary and riparian habitat located adjacent to the street right-of-way.
The purpose of including the two alternatives in this Arborist Survey Report is to provide information regarding potential impacts to trees associated with each alternative.
3.0 METHODS
ECORP arborist Krissy Walker-Berry (ISA Certification #WE-11308A) conducted the field survey on August 19, 2016. During the field survey, Ms. Walker-Berry walked the Project site and recorded data using a sub- meter accuracy Trimble GeoXT Global Positioning System unit.
Data collected included species, tree tag number, dbh, dripline radius, structure, and condition. In accordance with the Tree Preservation Code, all native trees (regardless of size) within 100 feet of the centerline of the tributary to Linda Creek (considered the Riparian Zone) were surveyed. For trees outside of the Riparian Zone, all native trees with a dbh of six inches for single-stemmed trees, or with an aggregate dbh of 10 inches for multiple-stemmed trees were surveyed. In addition, any large nonnative tree that could potentially be considered a “landmark tree” was also documented. The survey results are intended for general project planning purposes only; therefore, these results should not be considered a detailed tree analysis (i.e., results do not include hazard assessment, tree health diagnosis, preservation/removal recommendations, or pruning advisement). See the Placer County Retirement Residence Tree Risk Assessment Report (Up A Tree Arborist Services 2018) for the tree risk assessment. The following terms define the collected data:
Diameter at Breast Height (dbh): Trunk diameter at 4.5 feet above grade. Occasional deviations from this height were required for trees with branching at this level or with unusual structural configurations (e.g., horizontal trunks). On multi-trunked trees (trees with multiple vertical trunks in contact at or near ground level), the report lists total aggregate diameter along with the total number of trunks that were measured.
Dripline Radius: The maximum distance from trunk to the edge of the canopy.
Condition: An estimate of the tree's overall health. This includes evaluation of foliage, evidence of wound healing, evidence of fungal attack, density of insect galls, and the amount and condition of attached deadwood. Condition was rated on a three-point scale (poor, fair, good).
ECORP Consulting, Inc. May 10, 2018 3 Placer Retirement Residence Project 2016-138
Arborist Survey Report for Placer Retirement Residence Project
Structure: An estimate of the tree’s structural soundness, based on obvious external evidence. This evaluates the obvious potential for structural failure of one or more major branches or trunks, the environment and condition of the root crown, symmetry of the canopy, and any noticeable effects of crowding caused by adjacent trees. Structure was rated on a three-point scale (poor, fair, good).
In addition, where appropriate, notes were taken regarding any unusual features (e.g., large trunk cavities, obvious damage or disease, girdling by barbed wire).
4.0 RESULTS
A total of 167 trees were inventoried within the Project site, including 138 trees located within the Riparian Zone (as defined by Placer County’s Tree Preservation Code). Four of these trees do not occur within the Project site; however, portions of their tree canopy occur within the boundaries of the property. Data was collected for these trees, but they were not given a tree number. A map depicting the locations of the inventoried trees is included in Attachment A. Detailed tree survey data for each tree are included in Attachment B. Representative site photographs are included in Attachment C.
Of the 167 trees within the Project site, 160 are native trees comprised of six different species. The most common species is interior live oak (Quercus wislizeni) with 75 individuals. In addition, there are 45 valley oak (Quercus lobata), 27 blue oak (Quercus douglasii), six Fremont’s cottonwood (Populus fremontii), five Goodding’s black willow (Salix gooddingii), and two red willow (Salix laevigata).
Seven nonnative trees were also inventoried as part of this survey predominantly due to their large size. This included one blue gum eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus), two London planes (Platanus x acerifolia), one white mulberry (Morus alba), one sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), one Chinese pistache (Pistacia chinensis), and one Chinese tallow (Triadica sebifera).
5.0 IMPACTS AND CONCLUSIONS
5.1 Full Frontage Improvements Alternative
Based on the impact map provided by Kimley-Horn, only 84 of the 167 trees found during the inventory are expected to be impacted either by direct removal or by indirect/partial encroachment by construction of the Full Frontage Improvement Alternative. Partial encroachment means that there will be impacts at the soil level within the Protected Zone of the tree through grade change or potential root flooding near natural ponding basins. An impact figure showing both direct and indirectly impacted trees is provided in Attachment D.
Six of the removed trees are nonnative, so they do not fall under Placer County’s Tree Preservation Code. These include trees 3, 5, 7, 8, 1885, and 2896; these are white mulberry, sweetgum, London plane, Chinese pistache, and eucalyptus trees, respectively.
ECORP Consulting, Inc. May 10, 2018 4 Placer Retirement Residence Project 2016-138
Arborist Survey Report for Placer Retirement Residence Project
Sixteen of the impacted trees (See Table 1 and Attachment D) are expected to have partial encroachments within the Dripline/Protected Zone. As such, these trees may be indirectly impacted by the Project. Work within the dripline of these trees should be monitored by an arborist to help minimize disturbances. If any of these trees are determined that they will be impacted such that they require removal, they will be mitigated accordingly.
Table 1. Potential Indirect Impacts for Full Frontage Improvements Alternative
Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name DBH (inches) 13 Goodding's Black Willow Salix gooddingii 32 36 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12 107 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 19.5 108 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 13 110 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12 133 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 54 135 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 12 202 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 12.5 238 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 8.5 239 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2 247 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 5.5 263 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12 1883 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2 1887 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 1 1888 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3.5 2893 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 26
The remaining 62 trees will be removed as a result of Project implementation (See Table 2 and Attachment D). Placer County requires inch-per-inch mitigation for tree removal. Therefore, as a result of this Full Frontage Improvements Alternative, a total of 898 inches will need either to be replaced on the property or have an equivalent monetary amount paid into the Placer County’s tree preservation fund.
Table 2. Proposed Tree Removals for Full Frontage Improvements Alternative
Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name DBH (inches) 9 Fremont's Cottonwood Populus fremontii 32.5 10 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 34 18 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 16.5 19 Interior Live Oak 41.5 Quercus wislizeni 20 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 31.5 21 Fremont's Cottonwood Populus fremontii 52 22 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 20 23 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 39.5 24 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 24
ECORP Consulting, Inc. May 10, 2018 5 Placer Retirement Residence Project 2016-138
Arborist Survey Report for Placer Retirement Residence Project
Table 2. Proposed Tree Removals for Full Frontage Improvements Alternative
Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name DBH (inches) 25 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 31.5 26 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 9 27 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 42.5 29 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 14 30 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 8 31 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 20 35 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 34 46 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 24 48 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 10 49 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 15 63 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 34 136 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 4.5 137 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 14 138 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 7 139 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 21 140 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 11.5 141 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 10.5 142 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2 213 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 12.5 214 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 10 215 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 1.5 216 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 9 217 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 4 218 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 10 219 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 2 220 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 18 221 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 6.5 222 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 6.5 224 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 5 225 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 1 226 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 6 228 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2.5 229 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3 230 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 9 240 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1 241 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 7 242 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 34 248 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2.5 249 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1
ECORP Consulting, Inc. May 10, 2018 6 Placer Retirement Residence Project 2016-138
Arborist Survey Report for Placer Retirement Residence Project
Table 2. Proposed Tree Removals for Full Frontage Improvements Alternative
Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name DBH (inches) 250 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3 251 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1 252 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2.5 253 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 7 261 Goodding's Black Willow Salix gooddingii 21 262 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 5.5 1870 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 7 1871 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 10 1872 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 32 1873 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 8.5 1876 Goodding's Black Willow Salix gooddingii 2.5 1884 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3 1886 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3 2894 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 36 Total Inches Proposed for Removal: 898.0
5.2 Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative
Based on the impact map provided by Kimley-Horn, only 59 of the 167 trees found during the inventory are expected to be impacted either by direct removal or by indirect/partial encroachment by construction of the Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative. Partial encroachment means that there will be impacts at the soil level within the Protected Zone of the tree through either a bike trail with minimal impacts to the subgrade or potential root flooding near natural ponding basins. An impact figure showing both direct and indirectly impacted trees is provided in Attachment E.
Five of the removed trees are nonnative, so they do not fall under Placer County’s Tree Preservation Code. These include trees 3, 5, 7, 8, and 2896; these are white mulberry, sweetgum, London plane, and eucalyptus trees, respectively.
Twenty-six of the impacted trees (See Table 3 and Attachment E) are expected to have partial encroachments within the Dripline/Protected Zone. As such, these trees may be indirectly impacted by the Project. Work within the dripline of these trees should be monitored by an arborist to help minimize disturbances. If any of these trees are determined that they will be impacted such that they require removal, they will be mitigated accordingly.
Table 3. Potential Indirect Impacts for Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative
Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name DBH (inches) 40 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 18.5 106 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 22.5
ECORP Consulting, Inc. May 10, 2018 7 Placer Retirement Residence Project 2016-138
Arborist Survey Report for Placer Retirement Residence Project
Table 3. Potential Indirect Impacts for Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative
Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name DBH (inches) 107 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 19.5 108 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 13 110 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12 111 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12 117 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 9.5 119 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 32 122 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 19.5 123 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 21.5 127 Red Willow Salix laevigata 31 129 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12.5 132 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 4 206 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 1 208 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 4.5 233 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 25.5 234 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 8 235 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 7.5 236 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3.5 1877 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 8.5 1878 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 5 1879 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 5.5 1880 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 4.5 1883 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2 2893 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 26 2894 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 36
The remaining 28 trees will be removed as a result of Project implementation (See Table 4 and Attachment E). Placer County requires inch-per-inch mitigation for tree removal. Therefore, as a result of this Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative, a total of 494.5 inches will need either to be replaced on the property or have an equivalent monetary amount paid into the Placer County’s tree preservation fund.
Table 4. Proposed Tree Removals for Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative
Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name DBH (inches) 9 Fremont's Cottonwood Populus fremontii 32.5 10 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 34 13 Goodding's Black Willow Salix gooddingii 32 18 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 16.5
19 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 41.5 20 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 31.5
ECORP Consulting, Inc. May 10, 2018 8 Placer Retirement Residence Project 2016-138
Arborist Survey Report for Placer Retirement Residence Project
Table 4. Proposed Tree Removals for Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative
Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name DBH (inches) 21 Fremont's Cottonwood Populus fremontii 52 46 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 24 48 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 10 49 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 15 63 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 34 114 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 11 115 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 14 116 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 6 120 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 17.5 121 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 2.5 138 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 7 139 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 21 140 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 11.5 141 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 10.5 142 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2 262 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 5.5 1870 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 7 1871 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 10 1872 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 32 1873 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 8.5 1876 Goodding's Black Willow Salix gooddingii 2.5 1884 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3 Total Inches Proposed for Removal: 494.5
5.3 Summary
Based on the impacts shown above, the Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative will result in less impacts to trees (494.5 total inches removed) as compared to the Full Frontage Improvements Alternative (898 total inches removed), which would nearly double the inches of trees impacted.
ECORP Consulting, Inc. May 10, 2018 9 Placer Retirement Residence Project 2016-138
Arborist Survey Report for Placer Retirement Residence Project
6.0 REFERENCES
Up A Tree Arborist Services. 2018. Placer County Retirement Residence Tree Risk Assessment Report, Placer County, CA. Prepared for Kimley-Horn. Loomis, California.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 1981. pr. 1980 “Folsom” 7.5-minute Topographic Quadrangle. Geological Survey. Denver, Colorado.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2016. Watershed Boundary Dataset for Placer County, California. Available at http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed July 20, 2016.
ECORP Consulting, Inc. May 10, 2018 10 Placer Retirement Residence Project 2016-138
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A – Tree Inventory at the Placer Community Retirement Residence Project
Attachment B – Tree Survey Data (19 August 2016)
Attachment C – Representative Site Photographs
Attachment D – Proposed Tree Impacts Full Frontage Improvements Alternative
Attachment E – Proposed Tree Impacts Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative
ATTACHMENT A
Tree Inventory at the Placer Community Retirement Residence Project
Tree Inventory at the Placer Retirment Residence
Map Features Property Boundary - 8.9 acres Native Species Blue Oak Fremont's Cottonwood Goodding's Black Willow Interior Live Oak Red Willow Valley Oak
9 Non-Native Species
101 Blue Gum Eucalyptus 8 100 103 Sweetgum 102
104 S I
E White Mulberry R (JDS)-JSwager 5/8/2018 7 R A Chinese Tallow
5 3 C 106 BLVD COLLEGE SIERRA 107 105 O
L London Plane
L E
108 G
E Chinese Pistache
B
L
V D
109 1874 Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri 110 Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 1872 10 1873 111 1869 112 1870 2899 1871 2900 40 2898 63 113 13 118 2897 119 1875 114 116 2896 121 115 120 1876 232 234 235 131 117 127 236 43 123 122 49 1878 132 129 1879 42 2894 207 1880 1877 233 237 128 125 124 48 210 130 2895 2893 205 258 1881 209 244 257 259 1882 206 208 231 245 212 243 33 202 204 239 256 1883 223 246 36 134 201 203 227 238 18 1886 211 247 135 263 1888 213 248 255 133 21 217 220 25 228 260 262 1884 1887 215 23 24 27 226 31 240 250 253 261 136 19 249 35 46 1885 30 241 142 214 225 137 22 218 219 221 222 29 254 141 216 224 26 229 230 242 251 252 20 138 140 139
OLD AUBURN RD Location: N:\2016\2016-061 Placer County Retirement Residence\MAPS\SSS_Survey_and_Mapping\Arborist_Tree_Locations\PCRR_TreeLocations_20180409.mxd Photo Source: 2013, USGS Map Date: 5/8/2018 2016-138 Placer County Retirment Residence #1 Sc ale in Feet I Boundary: Kimley-Horn 0 80
ATTACHMENT B
Tree Survey Data (August 19, 2016)
Tree Survey Data (19 August 2016)
Condition DBH Multi‐ Dripline Within Riparian Full Alternative Modified Alternative Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name Structure Health (inches) trunked (#) Radius (feet) Area (Y/N) Impacts Impacts 3White Mulberry Morus alba 35 1 19 Good Fair No Direct Direct 5 Sweetgum Liquidambar styraciflua 17 1 14 Good Fair No Direct Direct 7 London Plane Platanus x acerifolia 23 1 18 Good Fair No Direct Direct 8 London Plane Platanus x acerifolia 20.5 1 18 Good Fair No Direct Direct 9Fremont's Cottonwood Populus fremontii 32.5 1 15 Fair Fair No Direct Direct 10 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 34 1 23 Good Good No Direct Direct 13 Goodding's Black Willow Salix gooddingii 32 1 17 Poor Fair Yes Indirect Direct 18 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 16.5 1 24 Fair Fair Yes Direct Direct 19 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 41.5 6 21 Poor Fair Yes Direct Direct 20 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 31.5 1 20 Fair Fair Yes Direct Direct 21 Fremont's Cottonwood Populus fremontii 52 1 30 Fair Fair Yes Direct Direct 22 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 20 1 23 Fair Poor Yes Direct ‐ 23 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 39.5 4 10 Poor Poor Yes Direct ‐ 24 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 24 1 18 Good Fair Yes Direct ‐ 25 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 31.5 1 18 Poor Fair Yes Direct ‐ 26 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 9 1 15 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 27 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 42.5 2 18 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 29 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 14 2 12 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 30 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 8 2 12 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 31 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 20 1 21 Poor Fair Yes Direct ‐ 33 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 15.5 1 18 Good Fair Yes ‐‐ 35 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 34 1 25 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 36 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12 1 12 Good Fair Yes Indirect ‐ 40 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 18.5 2 15 Good Good Yes ‐ Indirect 42 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 10.5 1 12 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 43 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 18 2 14 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 46 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 24 2 18 Fair Fair No Direct Direct 48 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 10 1 12 Fair Fair No Direct Direct 49 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 15 1 10 Good Fair No Direct Direct 63 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 34 1 19 Good Fair No Direct Direct 100 Fremont's Cottonwood Populus fremontii 9.5 3 8 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 101 Goodding's Black Willow Salix gooddingii 9.5 5 12 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 102 Fremont's Cottonwood Populus fremontii 25 5 15 Good Good Yes ‐‐ 103 Fremont's Cottonwood Populus fremontii 5.5 1 13 Good Good Yes ‐‐ 104 Fremont's Cottonwood Populus fremontii 18 3 12 Good Good Yes ‐‐ 105 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 7.5 1 6 Good Good Yes ‐‐ 106 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 22.5 2 9 Good Good Yes ‐ Indirect 107 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 19.5 2 11 Good Good Yes Indirect Indirect 108 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 13 1 13 Good Good Yes Indirect Indirect 109 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 31 4 0 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 110 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12 1 12 Good Good Yes Indirect Indirect Tree Survey Data (19 August 2016) Condition DBH Multi‐ Dripline Within Riparian Full Alternative Modified Alternative Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name Structure Health (inches) trunked (#) Radius (feet) Area (Y/N) Impacts Impacts 111 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12 1 12 Good Good Yes ‐ Indirect 112 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 4.5 2 12 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 113 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 10 1 12 Good Good Yes ‐‐ 114 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 11 1 14 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Direct 115 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 14 1 13 Good Good Yes ‐ Direct 116 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 6 1 9 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Direct 117 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 9.5 1 16 Good Good Yes ‐ Indirect 118 Red Willow Salix laevigata 11.5 5 10 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 119 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 32 3 15 Fair Good Yes ‐ Indirect 120 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 17.5 6 7 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Direct 121 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 2.5 1 4 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Direct 122 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 19.5 6 10 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 123 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 21.5 4 12 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 124 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 5.5 3 6 Fair Poor Yes ‐‐ 125 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 11 6 7 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 127 Red Willow Salix laevigata 31 11 0 DOWN Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 128 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 2 1 5 Good Good Yes ‐‐ 129 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12.5 1 18 Good Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 130 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 13.5 1 15 Good Good Yes ‐‐ 131 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1 1 0 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 132 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 4 2 5 Good Good Yes ‐ Indirect 133 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 54 6 20 Good Good Yes Indirect ‐ 134 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 5.5 4 0 Good Good Yes ‐‐ 135 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 12 1 13 Good Good Yes Indirect ‐ 136 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 4.5 3 5 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 137 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 14 1 18 Good Good Yes Direct ‐ 138 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 7 3 7 Poor Fair Yes Direct Direct 139 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 21 6 12 Fair Good Yes Direct Direct 140 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 11.5 3 10 Fair Fair Yes Direct Direct 141 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 10.5 1 12 Fair Fair Yes Direct Direct 142 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2 2 4 Good Good Yes Direct Direct 201 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 5 2 7 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 202 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 12.5 4 10 Fair Fair Yes Indirect ‐ 203 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 7.5 2 12 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 204 (2044) Valley Oak Quercus lobata 5.5 2 7 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 205 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3.5 1 5 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 206 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 1 1 4 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 207 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1 1 4 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 208 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 4.5 3 8 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 209 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 1.5 1 5 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 210 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 36.5 5 14 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ Tree Survey Data (19 August 2016) Condition DBH Multi‐ Dripline Within Riparian Full Alternative Modified Alternative Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name Structure Health (inches) trunked (#) Radius (feet) Area (Y/N) Impacts Impacts 211 Chinese Tallow Triadica sebifera 5 2 10 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 212 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 9 4 8 Fair Good Yes ‐‐ 213 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 12.5 1 18 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 214 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 10 2 12 Poor Fair Yes Direct ‐ 215 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 1.5 1 3 Poor Fair Yes Direct ‐ 216 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 9 1 13 Good Fair Yes Direct ‐ 217 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 4 1 10 Poor Fair Yes Direct ‐ 218 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 10 2 10 Poor Poor Yes Direct ‐ 219 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 2 1 5 Good Poor Yes Direct ‐ 220 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 18 3 12 Fair Poor Yes Direct ‐ 221 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 6.5 2 10 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 222 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 6.5 4 4 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 223 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 4.5 1 8 Good Fair Yes ‐‐ 224 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 5 3 8 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 225 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 1 1 3 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 226 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 6 1 10 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 227 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 6 1 10 Good Fair Yes ‐‐ 228 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2.5 2 5 Fair Good Yes Direct ‐ 229 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3 1 8 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 230 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 9 2 15 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 231 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 3.5 1 7 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 232 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 1 1 5 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 233 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 25.5 2 16 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 234 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 8 1 6 Good Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 235 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 7.5 1 8 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 236 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3.5 3 5 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 237 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 2 1 3 Good Fair Yes ‐‐ 238 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 8.5 1 12 Good Fair Yes Indirect ‐ 239 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2 1 5 Fair Fair Yes Indirect ‐ 240 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1 1 3 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 241 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 7 4 5 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 242 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 34 3 24 Poor Poor Yes Direct ‐ 243 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3 2 10 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 244 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 4 3 7 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 245 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 2 1 5 Good Fair Yes ‐‐ 246 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3.5 2 6 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 247 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 5.5 3 7 Good Fair Yes Indirect ‐ 248 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2.5 2 5 Fair Good Yes Direct ‐ 249 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1 1 4 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 250 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3 2 6 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 251 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1 1 5 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ Tree Survey Data (19 August 2016) Condition DBH Multi‐ Dripline Within Riparian Full Alternative Modified Alternative Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name Structure Health (inches) trunked (#) Radius (feet) Area (Y/N) Impacts Impacts 252 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2.5 2 5 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 253 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 7 2 10 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 254 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 6 1 8 Good Fair Yes ‐‐ 255 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1.5 1 4 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 256 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1.5 1 5 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 257 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 2 2 4 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 258 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2 1 5 Good Fair Yes ‐‐ 259 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1 1 4 Good Fair Yes ‐‐ 260 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1 1 3 Good Fair Yes ‐‐ 261 Goodding's Black Willow Salix gooddingii 21 3 15 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 262 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 5.5 1 6 Good Fair No Direct Direct 263 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12 3 7 Fair Good No Indirect ‐ 1869 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 18.5 2 16 Good Fair No ‐‐ 1870 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 7 1 9 Fair Fair No Direct Direct 1871 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 10 1 16 Fair Fair No Direct Direct 1872 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 32 3 20 Fair Fair No Direct Direct 1873 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 8.5 1 17 Fair Fair No Direct Direct 1874 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 19.5 1 17 Good Fair No ‐‐ 1875 Goodding's Black Willow Salix gooddingii 29 2 18 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 1876 Goodding's Black Willow Salix gooddingii 2.5 2 6 Fair Fair Yes Direct Direct 1877 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 8.5 2 11 Fair Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 1878 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 5 3 10 Poor Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 1879 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 5.5 3 7 Poor Fair Yes ‐ Indirect 1880 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 4.5 3 6 Fair Good Yes ‐ Indirect 1881 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 1.5 1 7 Fair Fair Yes ‐‐ 1882 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 4 2 8 Good Good Yes ‐‐ 1883 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 2 1 7 Good Good Yes Indirect Indirect 1884 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3 3 8 Fair Fair Yes Direct Direct 1885 Chinese pistache Pistacia chinensis 2.5 2 5 Fair Good Yes Direct ‐ 1886 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3 3 5 Fair Fair Yes Direct ‐ 1887 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 1 1 3 Good Fair Yes Indirect ‐ 1888 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 3.5 2 10 Fair Fair Yes Indirect ‐ 2893 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 26 3 17 Fair Fair Yes Indirect Indirect 2894 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 36 2 24 Fair Fair No Direct Indirect 2895 Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 14 1 12 Good Fair No ‐‐ 2896 Blue Gum Eucalyptus Eucalyptus globulus 25 1 17 Good Good No Direct Direct 2897 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 12.5 1 12 Good Good No ‐‐ 2898 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 8 1 9 Good Fair No ‐‐ 2899 Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 12 2 9 Good Fair No ‐‐ 2900 Valley Oak Quercus lobata 9 1 8 Good Fair No ‐‐ ‐‐ Blue Oak Quercus douglasii 9 2 8 Good Good No ‐‐ Tree Survey Data (19 August 2016) Condition DBH Multi‐ Dripline Within Riparian Full Alternative Modified Alternative Tree Tag # Common Name Scientific Name Structure Health (inches) trunked (#) Radius (feet) Area (Y/N) Impacts Impacts ‐‐ Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 20 2 18 Fair Fair No ‐‐ ‐‐ Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 49 5 15 Fair Good No ‐‐ ‐‐ Interior Live Oak Quercus wislizeni 12 1 10 Good Good No ‐‐
ATTACHMENT C
Representative Site Photographs
Photo 1. View along the western border of the site from the southwestern corner of the Photo 2. View across the site from the southern bank of the tributary to Linda Creek, site, looking north. 19 August 2016. looking north. 19 August 2016.
Photo 3. View across the tributary to Linda Creek of the southeastern corner of the site, Photo 4. View of the southwestern corner of the site where the tributary to Linda Creek looking northeast. Sierra College Boulevard is visible in the background. 19 August 2016. crosses underneath Old Auburn Road, looking east. 19 August 2016.
Attachment C. Representative Site Photographs 2016-138 Placer Retirement Residence Project
ATTACHMENT D
Proposed Tree Impacts
Tree Impacts Full Frontage Improvements Alternative
Map Features Property Boundary - 8.9 acres 8" FW Frontage Grading Area Alternative 6
8 Native Species 5 Blue Oak
6 Fremont's Cottonwood Goodding's Black Willow 8 8 8" FW Interior Live Oak G G G G G G
G G G G G G 9 8" FW G G G G 9G G Red Willow G G G G G G
6 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 101 Valley Oak (JDS)-JSwager 4/12/2018 G G G G G8 G G G G G G G G G 100 103 G G G G G G G Non-Native Species G G G G G G G 102 104 S
G G G G G G G I Blue Gum Eucalyptus E
G G G G G G G R
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G R G G G G G7 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
A Sweetgum
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 8" FW 8"
6 5 3 C
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 106 BLVD COLLEGE SIERRA O
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 107 105 White Mulberry L
G G G G G G G G G G G G G L
G G G G G G G G G G G G G E 8" FW 8"
108 G Chinese Tallow
E
B L
V London Plane D 4" SS 8 Chinese Pistache 8" SS 7 Alterantive Project IMpact G G G G G G
G G G G G G
G G G G G G Direct Impact (Removal) G G G G G G 8" FW 109 4" W Indirect Impact (Dripline Impact) 1874 8" SS 8" FW G G G G G G G G Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri G G G G G G G G 9 110 Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, G G G G G G G G and the GIS User Community G G G G G G G G G G G G 10G G G G G G G G G1872G G G G G G G G G 7 8 1873G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 111 1869 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 8" FW 4" W 112 G G G 1870G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 2899 G G G G G G 1871G G G G G 4" W 2900 G G G G G G G G G G G 40 2898 G G G8" FWG G G G 63G G 113 G G G G G G G G G G G 13 118 2897 G G G G G G G G G G G 119 G G G G G G 8"G SS G G G G 1875 114 G G G G G G G G G G G 116 2896 121 G G G G G G 115 120 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 1876G G G 232 234 235 131 117 127 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 1878 236 132 43 123 122 G G G 49G G G G G G G G G G G G 129 G G G G G G G G G G G G 1880 1879 1877 42 125 G G G G G G G G G2894G G G 207 233 237 128 124 48 210 130 2895 G G G G G G G G G G G2893 205 G G G G G G G G G G G 258
8" SS 8" 1881 209 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 244 257 208 231 259 G G G G G G G G 1882G G G G G G 206 212 243 245 202 33 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 204 G G G G G G 239 256 223 246 36 134 G G G G G G G G 1883G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 238G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 201 203 227 135 G G G G G G G G G G G G G 18G G G 1886G G G G G G G G 211G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 247G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 263 1888 213 248 255 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 21G G G G G G G G217G G G G G G G G G G G G G G25G G G G G G G G G G G228G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 260G G G G G G G G G 133 262 220 253 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 1887G G G G G G G G G G G G 23G G G G G G G G G G G27G G 226G G G G G G 31G G G G 240G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 261G G G G 136G 19 1884 215 24 249 250 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G35G G G G G G G G 46 1885 30 241 G G G G G G G G G G G G142G G G G G G G G G G 214G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 225G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G137G G 22 218 219 221 222 29 254 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 141G G G G G G G G 216G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G224G G G G G 26G G G G G 229G G G G 230G G G G 242G G G G251G G G 252G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 20G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G138G G G G G G G G 140 139 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G OLD AUBURN RD 8" SS8" Location: N:\2016\2016-061 Placer County Retirement Residence\MAPS\SSS_Survey_and_Mapping\Arborist_Tree_Locations\PCRR_TreeLocations_Impact_20180409_AltPlan.mxd Photo Source: 2013, USGS Map Date: 4/12/2018 2016-138 Placer County Retirment Residence #1 Sc ale in Feet I Site Plan Data: Kimley-Horn 0 80
ATTACHMENT E
Proposed Tree Impacts Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative
Tree Impacts Modified Frontage Improvements Alternative
Map Features Property Boundary - 8.9 acres 8" FW Native Species 6
8 5 Blue Oak Fremont's Cottonwood
6 Goodding's Black Willow
8 8 8" FW Interior Live Oak
G G G G G G Red Willow G G G G G G 8" FW 9 9 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G Valley Oak 6 G G G G G G G G G
G G G G G G G G G (JDS)-JSwager 4/12/2018 101 G G G G 8G G 100 Non-Native Species G G G G G G 103 G G G G G G G G G G G G 102 Blue Gum Eucalyptus
104 S
I G G G G G G G E
G G G G G G G R
R Sweetgum G G G G G 7G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G A
8" FW 8" G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
6 5 3 C
106 BLVD COLLEGE SIERRA O White Mulberry G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 107
G G G G G G G G G G G G 105 L
G G G G G G G G G G G G L E
G G G G G G G Chinese Tallow 8" FW 8"
108 G E
B London Plane
L
V D
4" SS 8 Chinese Pistache
8" SS Impact Type 7 G G G G G G
G G G G G G
G G G G G G Direct Impact (Removal)
G G G G G G 8" FW 109 4" W Indirect Impact (Dripline Impact) 1874 G G G G G G8"G SSG 8" FW G G G G G G G G Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, G G G G G G G G 9 110 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G and the GIS User Community G G G G G G 1872G G G G G G 10G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 7 8 G G 1873G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 111 1869 8" FW G G G G G G G G 4"G W G G G G G G G G 112 1870 2899 G G G G G G G1871G G G 4" W 2900 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 40 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 8" FW 113 2898G G G G G G G G G 63G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 118 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 13G G G G G G G G 2897 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 119 8" SS 1875 114 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 116G G G G G G G 2896G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 121G G G G G G G G G G G 115G G G G G G G G G G G120 1876 232 G G G G G G G G G G 234 235 131 117 G G G G G 127 G G G G G G G G G G G 1878 236 132 43 G G G G G 123 122 G G G G49G G G G 129
G G G G G G 1879 42 2894 207 1880 1877 233 237 128 125 124 G48G G G G 210 130 2895 G G G G G 2893 205 258
G G G G G SS 8" 1881 209 244 257 259 G G G G G G G G 1882G G G G G G 206 208 212 231 243 245 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 33 202 204 239 256 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 223 1883 238 246 36 134 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 201 203 227 18 1886 211 247 135 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 213 248 255 263 21 1888 217 25 228 260 133 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 220 262 1884 1887 215 23 24 27 226 31 240 250 253 261 136 G G G G G 46G G G 19G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 249 35 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 1885G G G G G G G 241 142 225 30 137 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 22G G G 214 G G G218G G G G G 222 G G G G 216 219 221 224 26 29 229 242 251 252 254 G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 141G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 230 G G G G 20 138 G G G G G G G G G G 140G G G G G G 139G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G
G G G G G G G OLD AUBURN RD 8" SS8" Location: N:\2016\2016-061 Placer County Retirement Residence\MAPS\SSS_Survey_and_Mapping\Arborist_Tree_Locations\PCRR_TreeLocations_Impact_20180409_PrefPlan.mxd Photo Source: 2013, USGS Map Date: 4/12/2018 2016-138 Placer County Retirment Residence #1 Sc ale in Feet I Site Plan Data: Kimley-Horn 0 80