DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservation Status Assessment of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Uruguay 5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Conservation status assessment of the amphibians and reptiles of Uruguay 5 Conservation status assessment of the amphibians and reptiles of Uruguay Andrés Canavero1,2,3, Santiago Carreira2, José A. Langone4, Federico Achaval2,11, Claudio Borteiro5, Arley Camargo2,6, Inés da Rosa2, Andrés Estrades7, Alejandro Fallabrino7, Francisco Kolenc8, M. Milagros López-Mendilaharsu7, Raúl Maneyro2,9, Melitta Meneghel2, Diego Nuñez2, Carlos M. Prigioni10 & Lucía Ziegler2 1. Sección Ecología Terrestre, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Uruguay. ([email protected]; [email protected]) 2. Sección Zoología Vertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Uruguay. ([email protected]) 3. Center for Advanced Studies in Ecology & Biodiversity y Departamento de Ecología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. 4. Departamento de Herpetología, Museo Nacional de Historia Natural y Antropología, Uruguay. 5. Río de Janeiro 4058, Montevideo 12800, Uruguay. 6. Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA. 7. Karumbé. Av. Giannattasio km. 30.500, El Pinar, Canelones, 15008, Uruguay. 8. Universidad de la República, and Universidad Católica del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay. 9. Museu de Ciência e Tecnologia and Faculdade de Biociências, Pontifica Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. 10. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Intendencia Municipal de Treinta y Tres, Uruguay. 11. In memoriam. ABSTRACT. The native species of amphibians and reptiles of Uruguay were categorized according to the IUCN Red List criteria. Out of 47 amphibian species, seven are listed as Critically Endangered (CR), five as Endangered (EN), one as Vulnerable (VU), three as Near Threatened (NT), and two as Data Deficient (DD); the remaining species are considered to be Least Concern (LC). Among the 64 species of reptiles evaluated, one is listed as Critically Endangered (CR), seven as Endangered (EN), two as Vulnerable (VU), one as Near Threatened (NT) and seven as Data Deficient (DD); the rest are considered to be Least Concern (LC). The use of these results as an additional criterion in the definition of protected areas in Uruguay will contribute towards the conservation of the aforementioned threatened species and their associated ecosystems. KEYWORDS. Thretened species, Red List, herpetofauna, IUCN. RESUMEN. Evaluación del estado de conservación de los anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Las especies nativas de anfibios y reptiles de Uruguay fueron categorizadas de acuerdo a los criterios de la Lista Roja de UICN. De las 47 especies de anfibios, siete se encuentran En Peligro Crítico (CR), cinco En Peligro (EN), una Vulnerable (VU), tres Casi Amenazadas (NT), y dos con Datos Deficientes (DD); las especies restantes son consideradas como Preocupación Menor (LC). Entre las 64 especies de reptiles evaluados, una se encuentra en Peligro Crítico (CR), siete En Peligro (EN), dos como Vulnerables (VU), una Casi Amenazadas (NT) y siete con Datos Deficientes (DD); las especies restantes son consideradas como Preocupación Menor (LC). El uso de estos resultados como un criterio adicional en la definición de áreas protegidas en Uruguay contribuirá hacia la conservación de dichas especies amenazadas y sus ecosistemas asociados. PALABRAS CLAVE. Especies amenazadas, Lista Roja, herpetofauna, IUCN. The ultimate goal of conservation biology is to amphibians and 664 of the 8,240 known species of reptiles provide scientific concepts and data to design effective have been assessed on a global scale (IUCN, 2006b). As management strategies for the conservation of a result, 31 % of amphibian and 51 % of reptile species biodiversity. The design of a conservation system/ fell into one of the threat categories. In recent years (from network must be based on sound knowledge of species’ 1996 until 2006), there has been a sustained increase in life histories, as well as an understanding of the the number of species occupying each of the threat functioning of ecosystems and the social component that categories (IUCN, 2006a). interacts with natural environments (PRIMAK & RODRIGUES, As in other regions of the world (see MILLER et al., 2001). Unfortunately, efforts and decisions regarding 2007), evaluate the conservation status of amphibian and conservation are being taken based on a poor knowledge reptile species at a national level has been one of the of the biology of species or the functioning of ecosystems, main interests of Uruguayan herpetologists in the last due to the asymmetries between the time required to years. That interest motivated the publication of several generate such knowledge against the urgency of categorization schemes, such as those proposed by particular conservation actions (SOULÉ & ORIANS, 2001; ACHAVAL & OLMOS (2007), MANEYRO & LANGONE (2001; MCCALLUM, 2007). amphibians), MORALES FAGUNDES & CARREIRA (2001; It was in this context that the IUCN (International snakes), CARREIRA (2004; lizards), and CARREIRA et al. Union for the Conservation of Nature) “Red List of (2007, turtles) using the methodology of RECA et al. (1994), Threatened Species” arose as a tool to help in the rapid which has been widely applied in southern South America assessment and monitoring of the conservation status (GRIGERA & UBEDA, 2000). The process of elaboration of of biodiversity using all available information (HILTON- the Red Lists of Uruguay began with an initiative TAYLOR, 2000). Based on this categorization method, 5,918 spearheaded by the Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay. Iheringia, Sér. Zool., Porto Alegre, 100(1):5-12, 30 de março de 2010 6 CANAVERO et al. With the participation of the IUCN Uruguayan Committee, species, excluding sea turtles, we consider that all species two biodiversity groups were created to bring together have breeding populations and that Uruguayan the researchers working locally on each zoological group: populations may experience a negligible “rescue effect” Amphibia and Reptilia. Each of these working groups from populations outside the country (BROWN & KODRIC- proposed initiatives to complete the categorization of BROWN, 1977; HANSKI & GYLLENBERG, 1993). Thus, based both taxonomic groups at a regional (national) level using on the conceptual scheme for assigning an IUCN Red the IUCN criteria. Later, a Uruguayan Fauna Red List List Category at the regional level (IUCN, 2003), and Workshop, sponsored by the IUCN Regional Office for because it is unlikely that individuals from extra-regional South America (Quito, Ecuador), took place in November populations would be able to survive and reproduce 2000 in Montevideo. A working agenda was set at this within the region, we suggest that, in these cases, the meeting, which resulted in the creation of the Red List of assigned regional category be left unchanged. Since sea Amphibians and Reptiles of Uruguay following the turtles (Caretta caretta (Linnaeus, 1758), Chelonia mydas categories and criteria suggested by IUCN (2003, 2006a). (Linnaeus, 1758), Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholtz, The aim of this work is to report the results of this 1829), Dermochelys coriacea (Vandelli, 1761)) are assessment at national level. considered as visitors, and the conditions outside and within the region are deteriorating (step 2e and 2f in IUCN, MATERIAL AND METHODS 2003), the assigned regional category should be left unchanged (IUCN, 2003). The categorization of amphibian and reptile species We compared the percentages of each threat present in Uruguay followed the criteria established by category for Uruguayan amphibians and reptiles at both the IUCN (2006a) and using the guidelines for the global and regional (national) scales (sensu IUCN, 2006a) application of the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (Figs. 1-4). at regional levels (IUCN, 2003). Global categorizations for amphibians were taken from IUCN (2006b) and for RESULTS AND DISCUSSION reptiles from IUCN (2006a). Amphibians nomenclature and systematics followed FAIVOVICH et al. (2005), FROST et al. Of the 47 native amphibian and 64 native reptile (2006), and GRANT et al. (2006). Common names for species evaluated, 23 species were classified in a threat amphibians followed ACHAVAL & OLMOS (2007). The category (CR, EN, VU), four were Near Threatened (NT) nomenclature and systematics of reptiles followed and nine were considered as Data Deficient (DD). So, a CARREIRA et al. (2005) with some modifications: the name total of 75 species could be considered as Least Concern for the genus Echinanthera Cope, 1894 is replaced by (LC), this represents 67.6 % of herpetofauna from Uruguay Taeniophallus Cope, 1895 (SCHARGEL et al., 2005) and (Tabs. I, II). Liophis miliaris semiaureus (Cope, 1862) is replaced by The conservation status of the amphibians of Liophis semiaureus (GIRAUDO et al., 2006). Common Uruguay appears to be critical due to the relatively high names for reptiles follow ACHAVAL & OLMOS (2007) and proportion of Critically Endangered species (CR = 14.9 %), TIPTON (2005). which is twice that of the global average (7.4 %) (STUART The information used as a basis to assess each et al., 2004), and Endangered species (EN =10.6 %). On a species was taken from published sources (ACHAVAL, different note, the low proportion of Data Deficient taxa 2001; CARREIRA et al., 2005; NÚÑEZ et al., 2004) as well as (DD = 4.3 % vs. 24.1 % globally) reflects a relatively well- from personal observations of authors. Introduced developed knowledge of the distribution of the amphibian and reptile species (Lithobates catesbeianus Uruguayan
Recommended publications
  • Checklist of Helminths from Lizards and Amphisbaenians (Reptilia, Squamata) of South America Ticle R A

    Checklist of Helminths from Lizards and Amphisbaenians (Reptilia, Squamata) of South America Ticle R A

    The Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases ISSN 1678-9199 | 2010 | volume 16 | issue 4 | pages 543-572 Checklist of helminths from lizards and amphisbaenians (Reptilia, Squamata) of South America TICLE R A Ávila RW (1), Silva RJ (1) EVIEW R (1) Department of Parasitology, Botucatu Biosciences Institute, São Paulo State University (UNESP – Univ Estadual Paulista), Botucatu, São Paulo State, Brazil. Abstract: A comprehensive and up to date summary of the literature on the helminth parasites of lizards and amphisbaenians from South America is herein presented. One-hundred eighteen lizard species from twelve countries were reported in the literature harboring a total of 155 helminth species, being none acanthocephalans, 15 cestodes, 20 trematodes and 111 nematodes. Of these, one record was from Chile and French Guiana, three from Colombia, three from Uruguay, eight from Bolivia, nine from Surinam, 13 from Paraguay, 12 from Venezuela, 27 from Ecuador, 17 from Argentina, 39 from Peru and 103 from Brazil. The present list provides host, geographical distribution (with the respective biome, when possible), site of infection and references from the parasites. A systematic parasite-host list is also provided. Key words: Cestoda, Nematoda, Trematoda, Squamata, neotropical. INTRODUCTION The present checklist summarizes the diversity of helminths from lizards and amphisbaenians Parasitological studies on helminths that of South America, providing a host-parasite list infect squamates (particularly lizards) in South with localities and biomes. America had recent increased in the past few years, with many new records of hosts and/or STUDIED REGIONS localities and description of several new species (1-3).
  • Karyological Study of Amphisbaena Ridleyi (Squamata, Amphisbaenidae), an Endemic Species of the Archipelago of Fernando De Noronha, Pernambuco, Brazil

    Karyological Study of Amphisbaena Ridleyi (Squamata, Amphisbaenidae), an Endemic Species of the Archipelago of Fernando De Noronha, Pernambuco, Brazil

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PubMed Central Genetics and Molecular Biology, 33, 1, 57-61 (2010) Copyright © 2009, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética. Printed in Brazil www.sbg.org.br Short Communication Karyological study of Amphisbaena ridleyi (Squamata, Amphisbaenidae), an endemic species of the Archipelago of Fernando de Noronha, Pernambuco, Brazil Marcia Maria Laguna1, Renata Cecília Amaro2, Tamí Mott3, Yatiyo Yonenaga-Yassuda1 and Miguel Trefaut Rodrigues2 1Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 2Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. 3Instituto de Biociências, Programa de Pós Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil. Abstract The karyotype of Amphisbaena ridleyi, an endemic species of the archipelago of Fernando de Noronha, in State of Pernambuco, Brazil, is described after conventional staining, Ag-NOR impregnation and fluorescence in situ hybrid- ization (FISH) with a telomeric probe. The diploid number is 46, with nine pairs of macrochromosomes (three metacentrics, four subtelocentrics and two acrocentrics) and 14 pairs of microchromosomes. The Ag-NOR is located in the telomeric region of the long arm of metacentric chromosome 2 and FISH revealed signals only in the telomeric region of all chromosomes. Further cytogenetic data on other amphisbaenians as well as a robust phylogenetic hy- pothesis of this clade is needed in order to understand the evolutionary changes on amphisbaenian karyotypes. Key words: Amphisbaena ridleyi, karyotype, Fernando de Noronha, Ag-NOR, FISH with telomeric probes.
  • Herpetological Journal FULL PAPER

    Herpetological Journal FULL PAPER

    Volume 26 (January 2017), 73–80 Herpetological Journal FULL PAPER Published by the British Herpetological Society Reproductive biology of the nest building vizcacheras frog Leptodactylus bufonius (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae), including a description of unusual courtship behaviour Gabriel Faggioni1, Franco Souza1, Masao Uetanabaro1, Paulo Landgref-Filho2, Joe Furman3 & Cynthia Prado1,4 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Brasil 2Campo Grande, Brasil 3Houston, USA 4Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia Animal, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brasil We describe the reproductive biology and sexual size dimorphism of a population of the vizcacheras frog Leptodactylus bufonius in the Brazilian Chaco. Reproduction takes place during the rainy months (September–March). During courtship, females emit reciprocal calls and both sexes perform vibratory movements of the body; the latter is described for the first time in anurans. Amplexus and oviposition occurred inside subterranean chambers. The temperature in closed chambers was lower than outside chambers, which may aid in reducing desiccation risks of eggs and tadpoles. Females were larger than males, but males had longer heads and shorter tibias, which may be related to digging. The study reinforces the importance of ongoing discoveries on anuran natural history. Keywords: Chaco, natural history, sexual size dimorphism, subterranean chamber, vibratory movements INTRODUCTION 1988; Haddad & Giaretta, 1999; Haddad & Sawaya, 2000; Lucas et al., 2008; Kokubum et al., 2009). he genus Leptodactylus Fitzinger, 1826, comprises 74 Species in the L. fuscus group reproduce in sub- species distributed from southern Texas to Argentina, terranean chambers which may vary in size, shape, includingT Caribbean islands (Frost, 2015).
  • Anolis Planiceps (Leaf Anole)

    Anolis Planiceps (Leaf Anole)

    UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Diversity Anolis planiceps (Leaf Anole) Family: Polychrotidae (Anoles and Tree Lizards) Order: Squamata (Lizards and Snakes) Class: Reptilia (Reptiles) Fig. 1. Leaf anole, Anolis planiceps. [http://www.trinidad-tobagoherps.org/Images/planiceps.jpg, downloaded 24 October 2016] TRAITS. Formerly known as Anolis chrysolepis or Norops chrysolepis, the leaf anole measures up to 76mm from snout to vent according (D'Angiolella et al., 2011). The pads of their feet are specialised to help them rest on leaves and trunks (Fig. 1). They have a spotted red patch of skin below theirs jaws, which is extendable, called the dewlap (Fig. 2). The region along the lizard's spine has larger scales than the adjacent areas with those located in the mid-dorsal area being the largest. Along their heads are two prominent ridges as well as ridged (keeled) scales located above the eyes (Fig. 3). The dorsal scales of the leaf anole are several shades of brown while the ventral scales are a pale cream colour; patterns vary greatly within populations (Fig. 4) (Vanzolini and Williams, 1970). Male anoles have longer tails and the females have wider bodies and smaller dewlaps than males (Vitt and Zani, 2011). DISTRIBUTION. Leaf anoles may be found in a relatively wide range from east Venezuela to Guyana, Suriname, Columbia, Trinidad and Brazil (Fig. 5). They are found throughout the island of Trinidad primarily in terrestrial, highly forested areas (D'Angiolella et al, 2011). UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Diversity HABITAT AND ECOLOGY.
  • High Species Turnover Shapes Anuran Community Composition in Ponds Along an Urban-Rural Gradient

    High Species Turnover Shapes Anuran Community Composition in Ponds Along an Urban-Rural Gradient

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.01.276378; this version posted September 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. 1 High species turnover shapes anuran community composition in ponds along an urban-rural 2 gradient 3 4 Carolina Cunha Ganci1*, Diogo B. Provete2,3, Thomas Püttker4, David Lindenmayer5, 5 Mauricio Almeida-Gomes2 6 7 1 Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, 8 Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, 79002-970, Brazil. 9 2 Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato 10 Grosso do Sul, 79002-970, Brazil. 11 3 Göthenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Göteborg, SE-450, Sweden. 12 4 Departamento de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP, São 13 Paulo, 09913-030, Brazil. 14 5 Fenner School of Environment and Societ, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 15 Australia. 16 17 * Corresponding author: [email protected] 18 19 Carolina Ganci orcid: 0000-0001-7594-8056 20 Diogo B. Provete orcid: 0000-0002-0097-0651 21 Thomas Püttker orcid: 0000-0003-0605-1442 22 Mauricio Almeida-Gomes orcid: 0000-0001-7938-354X 23 David Lindenmayer orcid: 0000-0002-4766-4088 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.01.276378; this version posted September 2, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
  • Froglog95 New Version Draft1.Indd

    Froglog95 New Version Draft1.Indd

    March 2011 Vol. 95 FrogLogwww.amphibians.org News from the herpetological community The new face of the ASG “Lost” Frogs Red List The global search Updating South comes to an end. Africas Red Where next? Lists. Page 1 FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 | 1 2 | FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 CONTENTS The Sierra Caral of Guatemala a refuge for endemic amphibians page 5 The Search for “Lost” Frogs page 12 Recent diversifi cation in old habitats: Molecules and morphology in the endangered frog, Craugastor uno page 17 Updating the IUCN Red List status of South African amphibians 6 Amphibians on the IUCN Red List: Developments and changes since the Global Amphibian Assessment 7 The forced closure of conservation work on Seychelles Sooglossidae 8 Alien amphibians challenge Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis 9 Is there a decline of amphibian richness in Bellanwila-Attidiya Sanctuary? 10 High prevalence of the amphibian chytrid pathogen in Gabon 11 Breeding-site selection by red-belly toads, Melanophryniscus stelzneri (Anura: Bufonidae), in Sierras of Córdoba, Argentina 11 Upcoming meetings 20 | Recent Publications 20 | Internships & Jobs 23 Funding Opportunities 22 | Author Instructions 24 | Current Authors 25 FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 | 3 FrogLog Editorial elcome to the new-look FrogLog. It has been a busy few months Wfor the ASG! We have redesigned the look and feel of FrogLog ASG & EDITORIAL COMMITTEE along with our other media tools to better serve the needs of the ASG community. We hope that FrogLog will become a regular addition to James P. Collins your reading and a platform for sharing research, conservation stories, events, and opportunities.
  • Species Diversity and Conservation Status of Amphibians in Madre De Dios, Southern Peru

    Species Diversity and Conservation Status of Amphibians in Madre De Dios, Southern Peru

    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 4(1):14-29 Submitted: 18 December 2007; Accepted: 4 August 2008 SPECIES DIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF AMPHIBIANS IN MADRE DE DIOS, SOUTHERN PERU 1,2 3 4,5 RUDOLF VON MAY , KAREN SIU-TING , JENNIFER M. JACOBS , MARGARITA MEDINA- 3 6 3,7 1 MÜLLER , GIUSEPPE GAGLIARDI , LILY O. RODRÍGUEZ , AND MAUREEN A. DONNELLY 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, 11200 SW 8th Street, OE-167, Miami, Florida 33199, USA 2 Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] 3 Departamento de Herpetología, Museo de Historia Natural de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Avenida Arenales 1256, Lima 11, Perú 4 Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, California 94132, USA 5 Department of Entomology, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, California 94118, USA 6 Departamento de Herpetología, Museo de Zoología de la Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana, Pebas 5ta cuadra, Iquitos, Perú 7 Programa de Desarrollo Rural Sostenible, Cooperación Técnica Alemana – GTZ, Calle Diecisiete 355, Lima 27, Perú ABSTRACT.—This study focuses on amphibian species diversity in the lowland Amazonian rainforest of southern Peru, and on the importance of protected and non-protected areas for maintaining amphibian assemblages in this region. We compared species lists from nine sites in the Madre de Dios region, five of which are in nationally recognized protected areas and four are outside the country’s protected area system. Los Amigos, occurring outside the protected area system, is the most species-rich locality included in our comparison.
  • Ruínas E Urubus: História Da Ornitologia No Paraná. Período De Natterer, 1 (1820 a 1834) ; Por Fernando C

    Ruínas E Urubus: História Da Ornitologia No Paraná. Período De Natterer, 1 (1820 a 1834) ; Por Fernando C

    Hori Cadernos Técnicos 5 RUÍNAS E URUBUS: HISTÓRIA DA ORNITOLOGIA NO PARANÁ PERÍODO DE NATTERER, 1 (1820 a 1834) 1a Edição Fernando C. Straube Hori Consultoria Ambiental Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil Setembro de 2012 © URBEN-FILHO & STRAUBE CONSULTORES S/S LTDA. Ficha catalográfica preparada por DIONE SERIPIERRI (Museu de Zoologia, USP) Straube, Fernando C. Ruínas e urubus: história da ornitologia no Paraná. Período de Natterer, 1 (1820 a 1834) ; por Fernando C. Straube, apresentação de Renato S. Bérnils. – Curitiba, Pr: Hori Consultoria Ambiental, 2012. 241p. (Hori Cadernos Técnicos n. 5) ISBN 978-85-62546-05-1 1. Aves - Paraná. 2. Paraná - Ornitologia. 3. Ornitologia – História. I. Straube, Fernando C. II. Bérnils, Renato S., apresent. II. Título. III. Série. Depósito Legal na Biblioteca Nacional, conforme Decreto n1825, de 20 de dezembro de 1907. Dados internacionais de Catalogação da Publicação (Câmara Brasileira do Livro, São Paulo, Brasil) Capa: Composição com mata de araucária na Lapa (Paraná) (Foto: F.C.Straube), documentos e imagens de autoria de Aimée Adrien Taunay, Michael Sandler, Auguste de Saint-Hilaire e Jean Baptiste Debret, citados no texto. Foto em destaque: urubu-rei (Sarcoramphus papa) de Cassiano “Zapa” Zaparoli Zaniboni (www.zapa.photoshelter.com). 2012 http://www.hori.bio.br HORI CADERNOS TÉCNICOS n° 5 ISBN: 978-85-62546-05-1 CURITIBA, SETEMBRO DE 2012 CITAÇÃO RECOMENDADA Straube, F.C. 2012. Ruínas e urubus: História da Ornitologia no Paraná. Período de Natterer, 1 (1820 a 1834). Curitiba, Hori Consultoria Ambiental. Hori Cadernos Técnicos n° 5, 241+xiii pp. ABERTURA O CENTENÁRIO DA ORNITOLOGIA PARANAENSE “Às minhas viagens ao Paraná, atribuo a importância para que a continuidade do trabalho polonês na América do Sul não seja interrompida.
  • Linking Environmental Drivers with Amphibian Species Diversity in Ponds from Subtropical Grasslands

    Linking Environmental Drivers with Amphibian Species Diversity in Ponds from Subtropical Grasslands

    Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2015) 87(3): 1751-1762 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201520140471 www.scielo.br/aabc Linking environmental drivers with amphibian species diversity in ponds from subtropical grasslands DARLENE S. GONÇALVES1, LUCAS B. CRIVELLARI2 and CARLOS EDUARDO CONTE3*,4 1Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980 Curitiba, PR, Brasil 2Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Cristovão Colombo, 2265, Jardim Nazareth, 15054-000 São José do Rio Preto, SP, Brasil 3Universidade Federal do Paraná. Departamento de Zoologia, Caixa Postal 19020, 81531-980 Curitiba, PR, Brasil 4Instituto Neotropical: Pesquisa e Conservação. Rua Purus, 33, 82520-750 Curitiba, PR, Brasil Manuscript received on September 17, 2014; accepted for publication on March 2, 2015 ABSTRACT Amphibian distribution patterns are known to be influenced by habitat diversity at breeding sites. Thus, breeding sites variability and how such variability influences anuran diversity is important. Here, we examine which characteristics at breeding sites are most influential on anuran diversity in grasslands associated with Araucaria forest, southern Brazil, especially in places at risk due to anthropic activities. We evaluate the associations between habitat heterogeneity and anuran species diversity in nine body of water from September 2008 to March 2010, in 12 field campaigns in which 16 species of anurans were found. Of the seven habitat descriptors we examined, water depth, pond surface area and distance to the nearest forest fragment explained 81% of total species diversity.
  • Evolution of the Iguanine Lizards (Sauria, Iguanidae) As Determined by Osteological and Myological Characters David F

    Evolution of the Iguanine Lizards (Sauria, Iguanidae) As Determined by Osteological and Myological Characters David F

    Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series Volume 12 | Number 3 Article 1 1-1971 Evolution of the iguanine lizards (Sauria, Iguanidae) as determined by osteological and myological characters David F. Avery Department of Biology, Southern Connecticut State College, New Haven, Connecticut Wilmer W. Tanner Department of Zoology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuscib Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Avery, David F. and Tanner, Wilmer W. (1971) "Evolution of the iguanine lizards (Sauria, Iguanidae) as determined by osteological and myological characters," Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series: Vol. 12 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuscib/vol12/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. S-^' Brigham Young University f?!AR12j97d Science Bulletin \ EVOLUTION OF THE IGUANINE LIZARDS (SAURIA, IGUANIDAE) AS DETERMINED BY OSTEOLOGICAL AND MYOLOGICAL CHARACTERS by David F. Avery and Wilmer W. Tanner BIOLOGICAL SERIES — VOLUME Xil, NUMBER 3 JANUARY 1971 Brigham Young University Science Bulletin
  • The Reptile Collection of the Museu De Zoologia, Pecies

    The Reptile Collection of the Museu De Zoologia, Pecies

    Check List 9(2): 257–262, 2013 © 2013 Check List and Authors Chec List ISSN 1809-127X (available at www.checklist.org.br) Journal of species lists and distribution The Reptile Collection of the Museu de Zoologia, PECIES S Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil OF Breno Hamdan 1,2*, Daniela Pinto Coelho 1 1, Eduardo José dos Reis Dias3 ISTS 1 L and Rejâne Maria Lira-da-Silva , Annelise Batista D’Angiolella 40170-115, Salvador, BA, Brazil. 1 Universidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Núcleo Regional de Ofiologia e Animais Peçonhentos. CEP Sala A0-92 (subsolo), Laboratório de Répteis, Ilha do Fundão, Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, N° 373. CEP 21941-902. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 2 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zoologia, Museu Nacional/UFRJ. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Bloco A, Carvalho. CEP 49500-000. Itabaian, SE, Brazil. * 3 CorrUniversidadeesponding Federal author. de E-mail: Sergipe, [email protected] Departamento de Biociências, Laboratório de Biologia e Ecologia de Vertebrados (LABEV), Campus Alberto de Abstract: to its history. The Reptile Collection of the Museu de Zoologia from Universidade Federal da Bahia (CRMZUFBA) has 5,206 specimens and Brazilian 185 species scientific (13 collections endemic to represent Brazil and an 9important threatened) sample with of one the quarter country’s of biodiversitythe known reptile and are species a testament listed in Brazil, from over 175 municipalities. Although the CRMZUFBA houses species from all Brazilian biomes there is a strong regional presence. Knowledge of the species housed in smaller collections could avoid unrepresentative species descriptions and provide information concerning intraspecific variation, ecological features and geographic coverage.
  • Dietary Resource Use by an Assemblage of Terrestrial Frogs from the Brazilian Cerrado

    Dietary Resource Use by an Assemblage of Terrestrial Frogs from the Brazilian Cerrado

    NORTH-WESTERN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 15 (2): 135-146 ©NWJZ, Oradea, Romania, 2019 Article No.: e181502 http://biozoojournals.ro/nwjz/index.html Dietary resource use by an assemblage of terrestrial frogs from the Brazilian Cerrado Thiago MARQUES-PINTO1,*, André Felipe BARRETO-LIMA1,2,3 and Reuber Albuquerque BRANDÃO1 1. Laboratório de Fauna e Unidades de Conservação, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília – DF, Brazil. 70.910-900, [email protected] 2. Departamento de Ciências Fisiológicas, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília – DF, Brazil. 70.910-900, [email protected] 3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade de Brasília, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília – DF, Brazil. 70.910-900. *Corresponding author, T. Marques-Pinto, E-mail: [email protected] Received: 08. June 2016 / Accepted: 07. April 2018 / Available online: 19. April 2018 / Printed: December 2019 Abstract. Diet is an important aspect of the ecological niche, and assemblages are often structured based on the ways food resources are partitioned among coexisting species. However, few works investigated the use of food resources in anuran communities in the Brazilian Cerrado biome. Thereby, we studied the feeding ecology of an anuran assembly composed of six terrestrial frog species in a Cerrado protected area. Our main purpose was to detect if there was a structure in the assemblage based on the species’ diet, in terms of the feeding niche overlap and the species’ size. All specimens were collected by pitfall traps placed along a lagoon margin, during the rainy season. We collected six frog species: Elachistocleis cesarii (172 individuals), Leptodactylus fuscus (10), L.