DOCSLIB.ORG

Teoretisk Fysik

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Teoretisk Fysik 1 Teoretisk fysik Institutionen för fysik Helsingfors Universitet 12.11. 2008 Paul Hoyer 530013 Presentation av de fysikaliska vetenskaperna (3 sp, 1 sv) Kursbeskrivning: I kursen presenteras de fysikaliska vetenskaperna med sina huvudämnen astronomi, fysik, geofysik, meteorologi samt teoretisk fysik. Den allmänna studiegången presenteras samt en inblick i arbetsmarkanden för utexaminerade fysiker ges. Kursens centrala innehåll: Kursen innehåller en presentation av de fysikaliska vetenskapernas huvudämnes uppbyggnad samt centrala forskningsobjekt. Presentationen ges av institutionens lärare samt av utomstående forskare och fysiker i industrin. Centrala färdigheter: Att kunna tillgodogöra sig en muntlig presentation sam föra en diskussion om det presenterade temat. Kommentarer: På kursen kan man även behandla speciella ämnesområden, såsom: speciella forskningsområden inom fysiken samt specifika önskemål inom studierna. 2 Bakgrund Den fortgående specialiseringen inom naturvetenskaperna ledde till att teoretisk fysik utvecklades till ett eget delområde av fysiken Professurer i teoretisk fysik år 1900: 8 i Tyskland, 2 i USA,1 i Holland, 0 i Storbritannien Professorer i teoretisk fysik år 2008: Talrika! Även forskningsinstitut för teoretisk fysik (Nordita @ Stockholm, Kavli @ Santa Barbara,...) Teoretisk fysik är egentligen en metod (jfr. experimentell och numerisk fysik) som täcker alla områden av fysiken: Kondenserad materie Optik Kärnfysik Högenergifysik,... 3 Kring nyttan av teoretisk fysik Rutherford 1910: “How can a fellow sit down at a table and calculate something that would take me, me, six months to measure in the laboratory?” 1928: Dirac realized that his equation in fact describes two spin-1/2 particles with opposite charge. He first thought the two were the electron and the proton, but it was then pointed out to him by Igor Tamm and Robert Oppenheimer that they must have the same mass, and the new particle became the anti-electron, the positron. It was discovered by Carl Anderson in 1932 (Nobel Prize 1936): Cloud chamber photograph by C.D. Anderson of the first positron ever identified. A 6 mm lead plate separates the upper half of the chamber from the lower half. The positron must have come from below since the upper track is bent more strongly in the magnetic field indicating a lower energy Rutherford 1933: “ It seems to me that in some way it is regrettable that we had a theory of the positive electron before the beginning of the experiments... I would have liked it better if the theory had arrived after the experimental facts had been established.” 4 The QED experience 5 In his report to the 12th Solvay Congress (Brussels, 1961) on “The Present Status of Quantum Electrodynamics” (QED), Feynman called for more insight and physical intuition in QED calculations: “It seems that very little physical intuition has yet been developed in this subject. In nearly every case we are reduced to computing exactly a coefficient of some specific term. We have no way to get a general idea of the result to be expected. To make my view clearer, consider, for example, the anomalous electron moment, (g–2)/2 = α/2π – 0.328α2/π2 . We have no physical picture by which we can easily see that the correction is roughly α/2π , in fact, we do not even know why the sign is positive (other than by computing it). In another field we would not be content with the calculation of the second order term to three significant figures without enough understanding to get a rational estimate of the order of magnitude of the third. We have been computing terms like a blind man exploring a new room, but soon we must develop some concept of this room as a whole, and to have some idea of what is contained in it. As a specific challenge, is there any method of computing the anomalous moment of the electron which, on first rough approximation, gives a fair approximation to the α term and a crude one to α2 ; and when improved, increases the accuracy of the α2 term, yielding a rough estimate of α3 and beyond?” 6 gµ/2 = 1.0 011 659 214 (8)(3) e /2mµ 7 Teori och experiment är nära förbundna: I det längre loppet är fysiker inte intresserade av teorier som inte kan verifieras genom mätningar. Teori drivs av experiment: Elektromagnetism (Maxwell), speciell relativitetsteori (Einstein), Kvantmekanik (Planck, Einstein, Bohr,...)... och vice versa: Allmän relativitetsteori (Einstein), antimaterie (Dirac), ... Framgångarna med att förutsäga och förklara experimentella data har givit teoretisk fysik hög status: Många nobelpris ges till teoretiska fysiker The Nobel Prize in Physics 2008 "for the discovery of the "for the discovery of the origin of the broken symmetry mechanism of which predicts the existence of at least three families of spontaneous broken quarks in nature" symmetry in subatomic physics" Photo: Universtity of Chicago Photo: KEK Photo: Kyoto University Yoichiro Nambu Makoto Kobayashi Toshihide Maskawa 1/2 of the prize 1/4 of the prize 1/4 of the prize USA Japan Japan Enrico Fermi Institute, University High Energy Accelerator Research Kyoto Sangyo University; Yukawa of Chicago Organization (KEK) Institute for Theoretical Physics Chicago, IL, USA Tsukuba, Japan (YITP), Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan b. 1921 b. 1944 b. 1940 (in Tokyo, Japan) Titles, data and places given above refer to the time of the award. About Nobelprize.org Privacy Policy Terms of Use Technical Support RSS The Official Web Site of the Nobel Foundation Copyright © Nobel Web AB 2008 http://nobelprize.org/cgi-bin/print?from=%2Fnobel_prizes%... 10/22/08 10:26 AM All Nobel Laureates in Physics The Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded to 183 individuals since 1901. (John Bardeen was awarded the prize in both 1956 and 1972.) Click on a name to go to the Laureate's page. 9 JumpNobel down Prizesto: | 1980 in | 1960 theoretical | 1940 | 1920 physics,| 1901 | 1989 – 2008 2008 - Yoichiro Nambu, Makoto Kobayashi, Toshihide Maskawa 2007 - Albert Fert, Peter Grünberg 2006 - John C. Mather, George F. Smoot 2005 - Roy J. Glauber, John L. Hall, Theodor W. Hänsch 2004 - David J. Gross, H. David Politzer, Frank Wilczek 2003 - Alexei A. Abrikosov, Vitaly L. Ginzburg, Anthony J. Leggett 2002 - Raymond Davis Jr., Masatoshi Koshiba, Riccardo Giacconi 2001 - Eric A. Cornell, Wolfgang Ketterle, Carl E. Wieman 2000 - Zhores I. Alferov, Herbert Kroemer, Jack S. Kilby 1999 - Gerardus 't Hooft, Martinus J.G. Veltman 1998 - Robert B. Laughlin, Horst L. Störmer, Daniel C. Tsui 1997 - Steven Chu, Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, William D. Phillips 1996 - David M. Lee, Douglas D. Osheroff, Robert C. Richardson 1995 - Martin L. Perl, Frederick Reines 1994 - Bertram N. Brockhouse, Clifford G. Shull 1993 - Russell A. Hulse, Joseph H. Taylor Jr. 1992 - Georges Charpak 1991 - Pierre-Gilles de Gennes 1990 - Jerome I. Friedman, Henry W. Kendall, Richard E. Taylor 1989 - Norman F. Ramsey, Hans G. Dehmelt, Wolfgang Paul 1988 - Leon M. Lederman, Melvin Schwartz, Jack Steinberger 1987 - J. Georg Bednorz, K. Alex Müller 1986 - Ernst Ruska, Gerd Binnig, Heinrich Rohrer 1985 - Klaus von Klitzing 1984 - Carlo Rubbia, Simon van der Meer 1983 - Subramanyan Chandrasekhar, William A. Fowler 1982 - Kenneth G. Wilson 1981 - Nicolaas Bloembergen, Arthur L. Schawlow, Kai M. Siegbahn 1980 - James Cronin, Val Fitch 1979 - Sheldon Glashow, Abdus Salam, Steven Weinberg 1978 - Pyotr Kapitsa, Arno Penzias, Robert Woodrow Wilson 1977 - Philip W. Anderson, Sir Nevill F. Mott, John H. van Vleck 1976 - Burton Richter, Samuel C.C. Ting 1975 - Aage N. Bohr, Ben R. Mottelson, James Rainwater 1974 - Martin Ryle, Antony Hewish 1973 - Leo Esaki, Ivar Giaever, Brian D. Josephson 1972 - John Bardeen, Leon N. Cooper, Robert Schrieffer 1971 - Dennis Gabor 1970 - Hannes Alfvén, Louis Néel 1969 - Murray Gell-Mann 1968 - Luis Alvarez 1967 - Hans Bethe 1966 - Alfred Kastler 1965 - Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, Julian Schwinger, Richard P. Feynman 1964 - Charles H. Townes, Nicolay G. Basov, Aleksandr M. Prokhorov 1963 - Eugene Wigner, Maria Goeppert-Mayer, J. Hans D. Jensen 1962 - Lev Landau 1961 - Robert Hofstadter, Rudolf Mössbauer 1960 - Donald A. Glaser 1959 - Emilio Segrè, Owen Chamberlain 1958 - Pavel A. Cherenkov, Il´ja M. Frank, Igor Y. Tamm 1957 - Chen Ning Yang, Tsung-Dao Lee 1956 - William B. Shockley, John Bardeen, Walter H. Brattain 1955 - Willis E. Lamb, Polykarp Kusch 1954 - Max Born, Walther Bothe 1953 - Frits Zernike 1952 - Felix Bloch, E. M. Purcell 1951 - John Cockcroft, Ernest T.S. Walton 1950 - Cecil Powell 1949 - Hideki Yukawa 1948 - Patrick M.S. Blackett 1947 - Edward V. Appleton 1946 - Percy W. Bridgman 1945 - Wolfgang Pauli 1944 - Isidor Isaac Rabi 1943 - Otto Stern http://nobelprize.org/cgi-bin/print?from=%2Fnobel_prizes%... 10/22/08 10:37 AM http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/theorist.html#aqmechanics 10 HOW to BECOME a GOOD THEORETICAL PHYSICIST by Gerard 't Hooft This is a web site (still under construction) for young students - and anyone else - who are (like me) thrilled by the challenges posed by real science, and who are - like me - determined to use their brains to discover new things about the physical world that we are living in. In short, it is for all those who decided to study theoretical physics, in their own time. It so often happens that I receive mail - well-intended but totally useless - by amateur physicists who believe to have solved the world. They believe this, only because they understand totally nothing about the real way problems are solved in Modern Physics. If you really want to contribute to our theoretical understanding of physical laws - and it is an exciting experience if you succeed! - there are many things you need to know. First of all, be serious about it. All necessary science courses are taught at Universities, so, naturally, the first thing you should do is have yourself admitted at a University and absorb everything you can. But what if you are still young, at School, and before being admitted at a University, you have to endure the childish anecdotes that they call science there? What if you are older, and you are not at all looking forward to join those noisy crowds of young students ? Gerard 't Hooft (cont.) 11 Theoretical Physics is like a sky scraper.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Igor Tamm 1895 - 1971 Awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1958
    Igor Tamm 1895 - 1971 Awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1958 The famous Russian physicist Igor Evgenievich Tamm is best known for his theoretical explanation of the origin of the Cherenkov radiation. But really his works covered various fields of physics: nuclear physics, elementary particles, solid-state physics and so on. In about 1935, he and his colleague, Ilya Frank, concluded that although objects can’t travel faster than light in a vacuum, they can do so in other media. Cherenkov radiation is emitted if charged particles pass the media faster than the speed of light ! For this research Tamm together with his Russian colleagues was awarded the 1958 Nobel Prize in Physics. Igor Tamm was born in 1895 in Vladivostok when Russia was still ruled by the Tsar. His father was a civil engineer who worked on the electricity and sewage systems. When Tamm was six years old his family moved to Elizavetgrad, in the Ukraine. Tamm led an expedition to He graduated from the local Gymnasium in 1913. Young Tamm dreamed of becoming a revolutionary, but his father disapproved . However only his mother was able to convince him to search for treasure in the Pamirs change his plans. She told him that his father’s weak heart could not take it if something happened to him. In 1923 Tamm was offered a teaching post at the Second Moscow University and later he was And so, in 1913, Tamm decided to leave Russia for a year and continue his studies in Edinburgh. awarded a professorship at Moscow State University.
    [Show full text]
  • CERN Courier–Digital Edition
    CERNMarch/April 2021 cerncourier.com COURIERReporting on international high-energy physics WELCOME CERN Courier – digital edition Welcome to the digital edition of the March/April 2021 issue of CERN Courier. Hadron colliders have contributed to a golden era of discovery in high-energy physics, hosting experiments that have enabled physicists to unearth the cornerstones of the Standard Model. This success story began 50 years ago with CERN’s Intersecting Storage Rings (featured on the cover of this issue) and culminated in the Large Hadron Collider (p38) – which has spawned thousands of papers in its first 10 years of operations alone (p47). It also bodes well for a potential future circular collider at CERN operating at a centre-of-mass energy of at least 100 TeV, a feasibility study for which is now in full swing. Even hadron colliders have their limits, however. To explore possible new physics at the highest energy scales, physicists are mounting a series of experiments to search for very weakly interacting “slim” particles that arise from extensions in the Standard Model (p25). Also celebrating a golden anniversary this year is the Institute for Nuclear Research in Moscow (p33), while, elsewhere in this issue: quantum sensors HADRON COLLIDERS target gravitational waves (p10); X-rays go behind the scenes of supernova 50 years of discovery 1987A (p12); a high-performance computing collaboration forms to handle the big-physics data onslaught (p22); Steven Weinberg talks about his latest work (p51); and much more. To sign up to the new-issue alert, please visit: http://comms.iop.org/k/iop/cerncourier To subscribe to the magazine, please visit: https://cerncourier.com/p/about-cern-courier EDITOR: MATTHEW CHALMERS, CERN DIGITAL EDITION CREATED BY IOP PUBLISHING ATLAS spots rare Higgs decay Weinberg on effective field theory Hunting for WISPs CCMarApr21_Cover_v1.indd 1 12/02/2021 09:24 CERNCOURIER www.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Laureates Endorse Joe Biden
    Nobel Laureates endorse Joe Biden 81 American Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine have signed this letter to express their support for former Vice President Joe Biden in the 2020 election for President of the United States. At no time in our nation’s history has there been a greater need for our leaders to appreciate the value of science in formulating public policy. During his long record of public service, Joe Biden has consistently demonstrated his willingness to listen to experts, his understanding of the value of international collaboration in research, and his respect for the contribution that immigrants make to the intellectual life of our country. As American citizens and as scientists, we wholeheartedly endorse Joe Biden for President. Name Category Prize Year Peter Agre Chemistry 2003 Sidney Altman Chemistry 1989 Frances H. Arnold Chemistry 2018 Paul Berg Chemistry 1980 Thomas R. Cech Chemistry 1989 Martin Chalfie Chemistry 2008 Elias James Corey Chemistry 1990 Joachim Frank Chemistry 2017 Walter Gilbert Chemistry 1980 John B. Goodenough Chemistry 2019 Alan Heeger Chemistry 2000 Dudley R. Herschbach Chemistry 1986 Roald Hoffmann Chemistry 1981 Brian K. Kobilka Chemistry 2012 Roger D. Kornberg Chemistry 2006 Robert J. Lefkowitz Chemistry 2012 Roderick MacKinnon Chemistry 2003 Paul L. Modrich Chemistry 2015 William E. Moerner Chemistry 2014 Mario J. Molina Chemistry 1995 Richard R. Schrock Chemistry 2005 K. Barry Sharpless Chemistry 2001 Sir James Fraser Stoddart Chemistry 2016 M. Stanley Whittingham Chemistry 2019 James P. Allison Medicine 2018 Richard Axel Medicine 2004 David Baltimore Medicine 1975 J. Michael Bishop Medicine 1989 Elizabeth H. Blackburn Medicine 2009 Michael S.
    [Show full text]
  • Almanac, 03/28/78, Vol. 24, No. 25
    Lniphnee Pertormance Review Of Record: Office of ('o#nputinç' Activities Photocop ring for Educational Uses Published the of Weekly by University Pennsylvania Report of the Provost's Task Force on the Study of Ad,,,:ssions Volume 24, Number 25 March 28, 1978 Annenberg Friends Contribute Funds, Support The Annenherg Preservation Committee, a student organi/ation headed by undergraduate Ray (Ireenherg, and the Friends of the Zellerhach Theater are helping the Annenherg Center meet its $125.000 fundraising goal and ensure the continuance of a professional theater season here next year. Approximately $500 collected by the Annenherg Preservation Committee during the student sit-in March 2-6 which was in part sparked h' the proposal to limit or curtail professional theater at Annenherg was presented to Annenhcrg Center Managing Director Stephen Goff last week. The committee is now offering for sale "Save the Center" t-shirts ($3) and buttons ($I). One dollar from every sale will go to the Annenberg Center. The committee is also arranging a special Penn All-Star Revue performance in May to benefit the Center. Another group. Friends of the Zellerhach Theater, headed by Diana Dripps and trustee Robert Trescher, will sponsor a gala benefit performance of Much Ado About Nothing, which they are Book fro,n the University of Pennsylvania Press edition of calling "Much Ado About Something." Seats will sell for $50 and jacket The Gentleman. $100. and anonymous donors have agreed to match funds raised Country from the special event. "Lost" Comedy to Premiere In addition, all funds raised by both groups will he applicable to a A Country Gentleman, a comedy written and banned n 1669 and challenge grant which may be awarded by the National Endowment considered lost for more than 3(X) years will hac its world for the Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Nfap Policy Brief » O C T O B E R 2017
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR AMERICAN POLICY NFAP POLICY BRIEF» O CTOBER 2017 IMMIGRANTS AND NOBEL PRIZES : 1901- 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Immigrants have been awarded 39 percent, or 33 of 85, of the Nobel Prizes won by Americans in Chemistry, Medicine and Physics since 2000. In 2017, the sole American winner of the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was an immigrant, Joachim Frank, a Columbia University professor born in Germany. Immigrant Reiner Weiss, who was born in Germany and came to the United States as a teenager, was awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics, sharing it with two other Americans, Kip S. Thorne and Barry C. Barish. In 2016, all 6 American winners of the Nobel Prize in economics and scientific fields were immigrants. These achievements by immigrants point to the gains to America of welcoming talent from across the globe. It does not mean America should welcome only Nobel Prize winners. Such a policy would be impossible to implement, since most immigrant Nobel Prize winners enter the United States many years before being awarded this honor. Most people immigrate to another country in their 20s, particularly employment-based immigrants, who either study in America or come here to work shortly after obtaining a degree abroad. The average of age of Nobel Prize winners at the time of the award is 59.5 years, according to economist Mark J. Perry.1 Table 1 Immigrant Nobel Prize Winners in Chemistry, Medicine and Physics Since 2000 Immigrant Nobel Winners Since 2000 33 of 85 American winners have been immigrants Percentage of Immigrant Winners Since 2000 39% Source: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, National Foundation for American Policy, George Mason University Institute for Immigration Research.
    [Show full text]
  • HOPE Meetings Are Held for Excellent Graduate Students and Young Researchers Specially Selected from Countries Around the 9Th Asia-Pacific and Africa Region
    For Overseas Cooperating Institutions Objective HOPE Meetings are held for excellent graduate students and young researchers specially selected from countries around the 9th Asia-Pacific and Africa region. These meetings give an opportunity for the participants to engage in interdisciplinary discussions with Nobel laureates and other distinguished HOPE MEETING scientists pioneering the frontiers of knowledge. They also give the participants, who lodge together over the course of the event, a chance to make friends and form collegial networks with Nobel Laureates with peers from the regions. The title “HOPE Meeting” signifies the promise held for the future roles of young researchers and optimism for creating a bright S&T future within the global community. Date F ebruary 26- ■ Saturday, February 25: Orientation & Registration M arch 2, 2017 ■ Sunday, February 26: Nobel Prize Dialogue Tokyo 2017 Organizer Venue Tokyo , JAPAN Office of the HOPE Meetings, JSPS E-mail [email protected] Tel: +81-3-3263-2414 Fax:+81-3-3234-3700 HOPE MEETINGS with Nobel Laureates Organizing Committee of the HOPE Meetings ■ Chair Makoto Kobayashi <Nobel Laureate in Physics 2008> Honorary Professor Emeritus, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ■ Members Noriko Osumi Mitsuhiko Shionoya Tohoku University The University of Tokyo Takaaki Kajita <Nobel Laureate in Physics 2015> Yousuke Takahama The University of Tokyo Tokushima University Kazuhiro Kosuge Fumio Hanaoka Tohoku University Tsukuba University Program of the HOPE Meeting The program
    [Show full text]
  • Ernest Rutherford and the Accelerator: “A Million Volts in a Soapbox”
    Ernest Rutherford and the Accelerator: “A Million Volts in a Soapbox” AAPT 2011 Winter Meeting Jacksonville, FL January 10, 2011 H. Frederick Dylla American Institute of Physics Steven T. Corneliussen Jefferson Lab Outline • Rutherford's call for inventing accelerators ("million volts in a soap box") • Newton, Franklin and Jefferson: Notable prefiguring of Rutherford's call • Rutherfords's discovery: The atomic nucleus and a new experimental method (scattering) • A century of particle accelerators AAPT Winter Meeting January 10, 2011 Rutherford’s call for inventing accelerators 1911 – Rutherford discovered the atom’s nucleus • Revolutionized study of the submicroscopic realm • Established method of making inferences from particle scattering 1927 – Anniversary Address of the President of the Royal Society • Expressed a long-standing “ambition to have available for study a copious supply of atoms and electrons which have an individual energy far transcending that of the alpha and beta particles” available from natural sources so as to “open up an extraordinarily interesting field of investigation.” AAPT Winter Meeting January 10, 2011 Rutherford’s wish: “A million volts in a soapbox” Spurred the invention of the particle accelerator, leading to: • Rich fundamental understanding of matter • Rich understanding of astrophysical phenomena • Extraordinary range of particle-accelerator technologies and applications AAPT Winter Meeting January 10, 2011 From Newton, Jefferson & Franklin to Rutherford’s call for inventing accelerators Isaac Newton, 1717, foreseeing something like quarks and the nuclear strong force: “There are agents in Nature able to make the particles of bodies stick together by very strong attractions. And it is the business of Experimental Philosophy to find them out.
    [Show full text]
  • Herbert Kroemer: Biography
    Herbert Kroemer: Biography Herbert Kroemer was born in 1928 in Weimar, Germany. He received a Doctorate in Theoretical Solid-State Physics in 1952 from the University of Göttingen, Germany, with a dissertation on high-field electron transport in the collector junction of the then-new transistor. One of the Göttingen professors, Fritz Sauter, had organized a seminar sequence, where the students had to give in-depth reports on selected key papers in the emerging semiconductor field. Kroemer was assigned the 1949 paper by Bardeen and Brattain on Physical Principles Involved in Transistor Action. The paper mentioned a few as-yet unexplained observations, and during his presentation, Kroemer suggested that the drift velocity of the charge carriers might decrease again with increasing field at sufficiently high fields. Sauter was intrigued and suggested that this might be a good topic for a dissertation. Ultimately, the observations in question had a different explanation. But the dissertation led to a career in the physics and technology of semiconductors and semiconductor devices, in a number of research laboratories in Germany and the U.S. Since 1976, he has been with the University of California at Santa Barbara. Dr. Kroemer is the originator of several device concepts, including the heterostructure bipolar transistor, and the double-heterostructure laser. During the ‘60s, he also worked on microwave device problems, and in 1964 he was the first to publish an explanation for the Gunn Effect. With the emergence of molecular beam epitaxy in the mid-‘70s, he returned to heterostructure devices, and he was one of the first to apply the emerging new technology to new and unconventional materials combinations, such as GaP-on-Si and InAs/(Al,Ga)Sb structures, making several contributions to the development of MBE itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Ion Trap Nobel
    The Nobel Prize in Physics 2012 Serge Haroche, David J. Wineland The Nobel Prize in Physics 2012 was awarded jointly to Serge Haroche and David J. Wineland "for ground-breaking experimental methods that enable measuring and manipulation of individual quantum systems" David J. Wineland, U.S. citizen. Born 1944 in Milwaukee, WI, USA. Ph.D. 1970 Serge Haroche, French citizen. Born 1944 in Casablanca, Morocco. Ph.D. from Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. Group Leader and NIST Fellow at 1971 from Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Professor at National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and University of Colorado Collège de France and Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France. Boulder, CO, USA www.college-de-france.fr/site/en-serge-haroche/biography.htm www.nist.gov/pml/div688/grp10/index.cfm A laser is used to suppress the ion’s thermal motion in the trap, and to electrode control and measure the trapped ion. lasers ions Electrodes keep the beryllium ions inside a trap. electrode electrode Figure 2. In David Wineland’s laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, electrically charged atoms or ions are kept inside a trap by surrounding electric fields. One of the secrets behind Wineland’s breakthrough is mastery of the art of using laser beams and creating laser pulses. A laser is used to put the ion in its lowest energy state and thus enabling the study of quantum phenomena with the trapped ion. Controlling single photons in a trap Serge Haroche and his research group employ a diferent method to reveal the mysteries of the quantum world.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter
    Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 Volume 5 • Number 1 worldscinet.com/appn Takaaki Kajita 2015 Physics Nobel Laureate published by Institute of Advanced Studies, Nanyang Technological University (IAS@NTU) and South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association (SEATPA) South East Asia Theoretical Physics Association Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter March 2016 • Volume 5 • Number 1 A publication of the IAS@NTU Singapore and SEATPA Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter publishes articles reporting frontier discoveries in EDITORIAL physics, research highlights, and news to facilitate interaction, collaboration and 3 cooperation among physicists in Asia Pacific physics community. PEOPLE Editor-in-Chief 4 “Observing the Distant Supernova” — Interview with Kok Khoo Phua Nobel Laureate Prof Brian Schmidt Associate Editor-in-Chief “Discovering the W and Z Bosons” — Interview with Swee Cheng Lim Nobel Laureate Prof Carlo Rubbia SEATPA Committee Christopher C Bernido Phil Chan Leong Chuan Kwek Choy Heng Lai Swee Cheng Lim Ren Bao Liu Hwee Boon Low Anh Ký Nguyên Choo Hiap Oh OPINION AND COMMENTARY Kok Khoo Phua 10 China’s Great Scientific Leap Forward: Completion of a Roh Suan Tung Preecha Yupapin planned ‘Great Collider’ would transform particle physics Hishamuddin Zainuddin Freddy Zen Editorial Team NEWS Sen Mu 12 CityU’s Institute for Advanced Study will Champion Bold New Han Sun Chi Xiong Research Initiatives Case made for 'Ninth Planet' Graphic Designers Chuan Ming Loo Erin Ong Cover Photo: "Takaaki Kajita 5171- 2015" by Bengt Nyman - Own work.
    [Show full text]
  • April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018
    april 17-19, 2018 The 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the a range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand United States’ oldest comprehensive science and medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this technology awards program. Each year, the Institute historic awards program. celebrates extraordinary people who are shaping our In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of world through their groundbreaking achievements these events and biographies of our 2018 laureates. in science, engineering, and business. They stand as We invite you to read about each one and to attend modern-day exemplars of our namesake, Benjamin the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, Franklin, whose impact as a statesman, scientist, all events are free, open to the public, and located in inventor, and humanitarian remains unmatched Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we celebrate his legacy, which has fueled the Institute’s We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From sparking a gene editing revolution to saving Institute Awards Week. a technology giant, from making strides toward a unified theory to discovering the flow in everything, from finding clues to climate change deep in our forests to seeing the future in a terahertz wave, and from enabling us to unplug to connecting us with the III world, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates personify the trailblazing spirit so crucial to our future with its many challenges and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Detectors Lecture Notes
    Lecture Notes Heidelberg, Summer Term 2011 The Physics of Particle Detectors Hans-Christian Schultz-Coulon Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik Introduction Historical Developments Historical Development γ-rays First 1896 Detection of α-, β- and γ-rays 1896 β-rays Image of Becquerel's photographic plate which has been An x-ray picture taken by Wilhelm Röntgen of Albert von fogged by exposure to radiation from a uranium salt. Kölliker's hand at a public lecture on 23 January 1896. Historical Development Rutherford's scattering experiment Microscope + Scintillating ZnS screen Schematic view of Rutherford experiment 1911 Rutherford's original experimental setup Historical Development Detection of cosmic rays [Hess 1912; Nobel prize 1936] ! "# Electrometer Cylinder from Wulf [2 cm diameter] Mirror Strings Microscope Natrium ! !""#$%&'()*+,-)./0)1&$23456/)78096$/'9::9098)1912 $%&!'()*+,-.%!/0&1.)%21331&10!,0%))0!%42%!56784210462!1(,!9624,10462,:177%&!(2;! '()*+,-.%2!<=%4*1;%2%)%:0&67%0%&!;1&>!Victor F. Hess before his 1912 balloon flight in Austria during which he discovered cosmic rays. ?40! @4)*%! ;%&! /0%)),-.&1(8%! A! )1,,%2! ,4-.!;4%!BC;%2!;%,!D)%:0&67%0%&,!(7!;4%! EC2F,1-.,%!;%,!/0&1.)%21331&10,!;&%.%2G!(7!%42%!*H&!;4%!A8)%,(2F!FH2,04F%!I6,40462! %42,0%))%2! J(! :K22%2>! L10&4(7! =4&;! M%&=%2;%0G! (7! ;4%! E(*0! 47! 922%&%2! ;%,! 9624,10462,M6)(7%2!M62!B%(-.04F:%40!*&%4!J(!.1)0%2>! $%&!422%&%G!:)%42%&%!<N)42;%&!;4%20!;%&!O8%&3&H*(2F!;%&!9,6)10462!;%,!P%&C0%,>!'4&;!%&! H8%&! ;4%! BC;%2! F%,%2:0G! ,6! M%&&42F%&0! ,4-.!;1,!1:04M%!9624,10462,M6)(7%2!1(*!;%2!
    [Show full text]