From the Section Head
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Feasibility Study for Railway Infrastructure Need Assessment in Moldova – Environmental and Social Appraisal Task 4
Moldovan Railway Restructuring project 24/11/2017 FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE NEED ASSESSMENT IN MOLDOVA – ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL APPRAISAL TASK 4 REF: EME – FR01T16G53-11 MOLDOVAN RAILWAY RESTRUCTURING PROJECT FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE NEED ASSESSMENT IN MOLDOVA – ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL APPRAISAL TASK 4 FICHE D’IDENTIFICATION Client CFM (Calea Ferata Din Moldova) Project Moldovan Railway Restructuring project Feasibility study for Railway infrastructure need assessment in Study Moldova – Environmental and Social Appraisal Task 4 Document Environmental and Social Appraisal Date 24/11/2017 Nom du fichier Feasibility study Moldova - Inception report - Frame Reference CFM Feasibility Study ToR - ENG Référence EME – FR01T16G53-11 Confidentiality Yes Language English Number of pages 128 APPROVAL Version Name Position Date Visa Modifications Environmental KRAJCOVIC Roman 24/11/2017 expert 6 GAUDRY Alain Key expert 24/11/2017 CUDENNEC Hervé EME Region 24/11/2017 SYSTRA • société anonyme à directoire et conseil de surveillance CS 41594 • 72,rue Henry Farman • 75513 Paris Cedex 15 • France | Tel +33 1 40 16 61 00 • Fax +33 1 40 16 61 04 Capital social 27 283 102 Euros | RCS Paris 387 949 530 | APE 7112B | TVA intra FR19387949530 4. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS The Environmental and Social Impact Assessment process is mainly based on and guided by the following documents: The Moldovan legislation on the Environmental Impact Assessment (Law No. 86 on Environmental Impact Assessment of May 29, 2014); Performance Requirements -
Improvement of the Groundwater Monitoring Network in the Danube- Prut and Black Sea River Basin
European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) Result 2 IMPROVEMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER MONITORING NETWORK IN THE DANUBE- PRUT AND BLACK SEA RIVER BASIN Moldova Final report; December 2020 Improvement of GW monitoring network Beneficiaries Agency of Geology and Mineral Resources (MD) Responsible EU member state consortium EUWI+ project leader Mr Alexander Zinke, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) EUWI+ country representative in Moldova Mr Victor Bujac Responsible international thematic lead expert Andreas Scheidleder, Umweltbundesamt GmbH (AT) Responsible national thematic lead expert Boris Iurciuc, Agency of Geology and Mineral Resources (MD) Authors Aurelia Donos, Oleg Prodan, Maria Titovet, Tatiana Matrasilova, Nadejda Ivanova all State Enterprise Hydrogeological Expedition of Moldova (MD) Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) is im- plemented by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), both responsible for the implementation of Result 1, and an EU Mem- ber States Consortium comprising the Environment Agency Austria (UBA, Austria), the lead coordinator, and the International Office for Water (IOW, France), both responsible for the implementation of Results 2 and 3. The program is co-funded by Austria and France through the Austrian Development Agency and the French Artois-Picardie Water Agency. This document was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or of the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area. -
Engthening of the River Basin Management Planning, Including Cross-Border Harmonization, with Direct Application to the Danube-Prut and Black Sea Catchment Areas
THE 4TH MEETING OF THE COORDINATING COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE ON INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (DNP) IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Strengthening of the River Basin Management Planning, including cross-border harmonization, with direct application to the Danube-Prut and Black Sea catchment areas • Mariana Codreanu, Deputy Chief of Water Resources Management „Apele MOLDOVEI" AGENCY Water Law no.272 / 2011 The management of water resources in the Republic of Moldova is carried out on the basis of the hydrographical basin, according to art. 5 of the Waters Law. Areas of hydrographic basins in RM are: - the border of the Dniester-Prut-Black Sea hydrographic basin - the boundaries of the hydrographic districts, the boundaries of the sub-basins and the special maps were approved by GD no.775 of 04.10.2013. In the district of the Nistru river basin are - 14 sub-basins In the Prut-Danube- Black Sea hydro-river basin district - 25 sub- basins THE RBM PLAN OF THE DANUBE-PRUT-Black SEA DISTRICT • The management plan for the Danube-Prut-Black Sea hydrographic district was developed within the EPIRB 2016 project; • The purpose of the Danube-Prut-Black Sea Management Plan is the sustainable protection and management of water resources and ecosystems. The program of measures has been developed; • The RBMP for Danube-Prut-Black Sea is elaborated according to WFD and art. 19 Water Law no.272 of 23.12.2011; • The RBMP for Danube-Prut-Black Sea will be approved by Government Decision, after which will be implemented. "Apele Moldovei" Agency - institution responsible for the implementation of the Plan; • The joint cross-border plan for the Prut river basin will be developed under the EUWI + project, under the coordnation of the Danube Convention Secretariat (ICPDR). -
Economic and Social Council
UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council ECE/MP.WAT/2006/16/Add.6 18 October 2006 Original: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE MEETING OF THE PARTIES TO THE CONVENTION ON THE PROTECTION AND USE OF TRANSBOUNDARY WATERCOURSES AND INTERNATIONAL LAKES Fourth meeting Bonn (Germany), 20–22 November 2006 Item 7 (e) of the provisional agenda PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF TRANSBOUNDARY RIVERS IN EASTERN EUROPE AND THE CAUCASUS DISCHARGING INTO THE BLACK SEA AND THEIR MAJOR TRANSBOUNDARY TRIBUTARIES Submitted by the Chairperson of the Working Group on Monitoring and Assessment Addendum 1. This preliminary assessment is an intermediate product that deals with major transboundary rivers discharging from Eastern Europe and the Caucasus into the Black Sea and some of their transboundary tributaries. 2. Based on the countries’ responses to the datasheets 1 and data available from other sources, only a very limited number of watercourses have been dealt with so far as shown in the table below. The other watercourses will be included in the updated version to be submitted to the sixth Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” (Belgrade, October 2007). This update will also cover other transboundary rivers discharging into the Black Sea (e.g. Rezvaya, Velaka, Danube, Siret and Delta-Liman) and their major transboundary tributaries. 1 The cut-off date was 1 September 2006. GE.06-25894 ECE/MP.WAT/2006/16/Add.6 Page 2 Transboundary rivers discharging into the Black Sea and their major transboundary tributaries (Eastern Europe and -
Europe Disclaimer
World Small Hydropower Development Report 2019 Europe Disclaimer Copyright © 2019 by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization and the International Center on Small Hydro Power. The World Small Hydropower Development Report 2019 is jointly produced by the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) and the International Center on Small Hydro Power (ICSHP) to provide development information about small hydropower. The opinions, statistical data and estimates contained in signed articles are the responsibility of the authors and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or bearing the endorsement of UNIDO or ICSHP. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information herein, neither UNIDO, its Member States nor ICSHP assume any responsibility for consequences that may arise from the use of the material. This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as ‘developed’, ‘industrialized’ and ‘developing’ are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. This document may be freely quoted or reprinted but acknowledgement is requested. -
Final Engineering Report 09/2009 M3 Section: Comrat South to Ciumai Appendix: Volume 5
FINAL ENGINEERING REPORT 09/2009 M3 SECTION: COMRAT SOUTH TO CIUMAI APPENDIX: VOLUME 5 EUROPEAN UNION REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE REHABILITATION AND EXTENSION OF THE ROAD M3 CHISINAU – GIURGIULESTI/ROMANIAN BORDER Europe Aid/125919/C/SER/MD Koblenz, Germany Chisinau, Moldova Road M3 Chisinau — Giurgiulesti/ Romanian Border Extension and Rehabilitation Project Final Engineering Report: Comrat South to Ciumai VOLUME 5 A 5.1 Environmental Assessment Report Joint Venture Kocks Consult GmbH, Koblenz – Universinj SRL, Chisinau ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REPORT 01/2009 EUROPEAN UNION REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE REHABILITATION AND EXTENSION OF THE ROAD M3 CHISINAU – GIURGIULESTI/ROMANIAN BORDER Europe Aid/125919/C/SER/MD Koblenz, Germany Chisinau, Moldova Kocks Consult GmbH • Stegemannstr. 32-38 • D-56068 Koblenz • Tel.: +49 261 1302-0 Fax: +49 261 1302-400 • E-Mail: [email protected] • Internet: www.kocks-ing.de Feasibility Study for Rehabilitation and Extension of the Road M3 Chisinau-Giurgiulesti / Romanian Border Environmental Impact Study Joint Venture KOCKS – Universinj s.r.l. Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY v 2. INTRODUCTION 1 2.1 Project Background 1 2.2 Objective and Scope of the Environmental Assessment 6 2.3 Approach and Methodology 7 3. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 9 3.1 National Environmental Policy 9 3.2 National Environmental Legislation and Institutional Framework 9 3.3 IFI-Environmental Policies 13 3.4 Land Acquisition and Resettlement Policy 17 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT 18 4.1 Introduction 18 4.2 Corridor Description 18 4.3 General Project Layout 20 4.4 Alignment Options 22 4.5 Economic and Social Need for the Project 28 4.6 Existing Traffic Volumes and Forecasts 28 4.7 Traffic Forecasts 29 4.8 On-site Works 31 4.9 Off-site Works 32 4.10 Construction 33 4.11 Implementation Schedule and Staffing 33 4.12 Lifespan of the Project 33 5. -
The Projects Are Implemented in Cooperation with the Ecocatalyst Foundation NARRATIVE REPORT Reporting Organisation: National En
The projects are implemented in cooperation with the EcoCatalyst Foundation NARRATIVE REPORT Reporting Organisation: National Environmental Center Country: Republic of Moldova Reporting period: 2015 1 1. Background This project has the following major activities which were carried out in 2015: CNM – leader in IWRM in Moldova Developing a youth network “Love your river!” Festival of Bic river Collaboration with the Ministry of Internal Affairs to counteract cases of environmental pollution Various activities were organised in 2015 to strengthen the youth network “Love your river!”. In autumn 2015 it is envisaged to organise the first Forum of the Youth Network “Love your river!” in order to agree and plan the activities for 2016. The third edition of the Festival of Bic river “Love your river!” will be organised in 2016 due to the fact, that there were organised local elections in summer 2015 and the chairs of the District Councils were changed, now CNM will establish relations with the newly appointed Chairs of the District Councils and other newly elected representatives of public authorities to further implement the Bic river Rehabilitation Initiative and plan the organisation of the 3rd edition of the Bic Festival. Letters to ask for the support will be again sent to private companies and to the Mayoralty of Chisinau municipality who will be the host of the event. It is envisaged to involve more seriously those companies which will be included in the SCR program of CNM. CNM will continue to promote the creation and support the operation of the River Basin Councils. At the moment CNM is Technical Secretariat of the Bic Basin Council which is meeting 3-4 times a year to discuss solutions for the improvement of the environmental state of the river, and it has also helped the local authorities to create Ichel Basin Council (spring 2015), Tigheci Basin Council (autumn 2014, the second meeting was organised in winter 2015) and Larga Basin Council (autumn 2014, the second meeting was organised in winter 2015). -
Mapping Cultural Hallmarks Through Names, Surnames and Orthodoxy
Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies Copyright 2017 2017, Vol. 4, No. 2, 53-64 ISSN: 2149-1291 Gagauzian onomastics: Mapping cultural hallmarks through names, surnames and Orthodoxy MitranIlie Iulian1 Doctoral School of Sociology, University of Bucharest Gagauzian onomastics presents us an intrequit structure which is characterized by various lingusitic layers that overlap, or at times, even blend in with each other. Unlike other Turcik groups, the Gagauzians pride themselves with their strong commitment to the Orthodox Church. Lexical layering is a defining characteristic of Gagauzian onomastics.As a result, the names and surnames that are found among these people are were, to a certain exctent, transfered from the those groups that they heavly interacted with until the present. The layered layout of Gagauzian onomastics refects the different stage of the coming into being of this peoples, taking this in to consideration, it is important to note that certain surnames are of older date than others, this being the case of those that are of Greek origin. Nowadays, in Moldova, the state with the largest Gagauzian communities, first names are of Russian origin, and are directliany linked to strong russofilia that is present within Gagauz communities beginning with the second falf of the last century.The data that was used for this paper was collected from various soruces – scientific papers, journals, annals etc. Within this paper we are attempting to highlight the conservative character of Gagauzian name-giving practices and the way in which this corelates to the virtues that are central to these peoples. Keywords; Mapping cultural hallmarks, Gagauzian onomastics, Orthodoxy, and Turcik groups From Cavarna to the desolate plains of Budjak: Key-events that shaped Gagauzian history and culture Just a few years ago, Congaz, a settlement in southern Moldova, was roomered to be benefinitng from a series of privileges, which were made possible through the good will of some high-ranking politicians from Kishinev. -
Part I: Introduction
Energy Conservation in Moldova ABSTRACT The importance of energy conservation in all the aspects of energy production, transportation, distribution and utilisation should not be underestimated. A special attention to that is paid since the oil crisis in 70’s of the last century. Today energy efficiency has increased considerably, but there is still a potential for energy savings. This potential is widely spread in power plants, energy supply systems, factories, plants, agricultural and residential facilities. In the countries in transition, such as former socialist countries, energy saving policies have started not so long time ago and a lot of work is to be done in order to improve energy efficiency and approach the level of developed countries. In Moldova, the energy sector is one of the most problematic parts of the national economy. 98% of the primary energy resources are imported, which complicates very much energy security in the state. Some internal problems, such as lack of investments in the sector, old and inefficient facilities, uncontrolled and unpaid energy consumption, internal social and political instability create additional difficulties in improving this situation. Industry and residential sector consume the highest amount of the supplied energy. It is obvious that improved energy efficiency in these sectors could lead to big energy savings. Reduction in energy consumption will favourably influence the impact of the energy sector on the environment. The present work aims at identifying energy saving potential in the industrial and residential facilities in Moldova. Interdependence between energy and environment, the positive influence of reduced energy consumption on the environment is shown. -
WWF Report PES En Final.Indd
WORKING TOGETHER TO INSPIRE SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS ECONOMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE FEASIBILITY OF PAYMENTS FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN UKRAINE Author: Oleg Rubel Editor: Maya Todorova Translation: Mid Yokshire Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Bulgaria Design concept: Boyan Petkov, Ina Kalcheva Printed at Geosoft EOOD Cover photo: ©Anton Vorauer / WWF-Canon © Text 2012 WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme All rights reserved This study was prepared as part of THE DANUBE PES PROJECT: PROMOTING PAYMENTS FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND RELATED SUSTAINABLE FINANCING SCHEMES IN THE DANUBE BASIN. This project promotes and supports land managers who help us sustain the benefi ts that we all get from nature. The project is implemented by the WWF Danube-Carpathian Programme with the fi nancial support of the GEF through UNEP and the European Commission. WWF-DCPO Ottakringer Straße 114-116 1160 Vienna, Austria Phone: +43 1 524 54 70 Fax: +43 1 524 54 70-70 WWF-Bulgaria WWF-România Str. Ioan Caragea Vodă nr. 26A, 010537, sector 1, Bucureúti Phone: +359/2 950 50 40, +359/2 950 50 41 Tel: +40 21 317 49 96 Phone /fax: +359/2 981 66 40 Fax: +40 21 317 49 97 CONTENT INTRODUCTION 01 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 02 WATER POLICY IN UKRAINE 03 INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN UKRAINE 07 INTEGRATED WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN THE UKRAINIAN PART OF THE DANUBE RIVER BASIN 09 WATER USE IN UKRAINE 10 WATER USE IN THE ODESSA REGION 12 UKRAINIAN AGRICULTURAL POLICY AND WATER USE 13 IRRIGATION ON THE SCALE OF UKRAINE 15 IRRIGATION IN THE ODESSA DISTRICT 16 ECONOMY OF WATER -
Background and Concept Paper for Investigative Monitoring
European Union Water Initiative Plus for the Eastern Partnership (EUWI+ 4 EaP) - Results 2 and 3 ENI/2016/372-403 BACKGROUND AND CONCEPT PAPER FOR INVESTIGATIVE MONITORING Investigative Monitoring Report Moldova Final version Responsible EU member state consortium project leaders Alexander Zinke; Umweltbundesamt (AT) EUWI+ country representative in Moldova Victor Bujac + Svetlana Stirbu Responsible international thematic lead expert Philipp Hohenblum, Umweltbundesamt (AT) Authors Marina Lungu Svetlana Stirbu Victor Bujac Philipp Hohenblum Alexander Zinke Arnulf Schönbauer Daniel Trauner Kristina Schaufler Yannick Pochon Florence Pintus Disclaimer: The EU-funded program European Union Water Initiative Plus for Eastern Partnership Countries (EUWI+) is im- plemented by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), the Organisation for Economic Co- operation and Development (OECD), both responsible for the implementation of Result 1, and an EU Member States Consortium comprising the Environment Agency Austria (UBA, Austria), the lead coordinator, and the In- ternational Office for Water (IOW, France), both responsible for the implementation of Results 2 and 3. The pro- gram is co-funded by Austria and France through the Austrian Development Agency and the French Artois-Picar- die Water Agency. This document was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union or of the Governments of the Eastern Partnership Countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of, or sovereignty over, any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area. -
The Danube River Basin District
/ / / / a n ï a r k U / /// ija ven Slo /// o / sk n e v o l S / / / / a r o G a n r C i a j i b r S / / / / a i n â m o R / / / / a v o d l o M / / / / g á z s r ro ya ag M The /// a / blik repu Danube River Ceská / Hrvatska //// osna i Hercegovina //// Ba˘lgarija /// / B /// Basin District h ic e River basin characteristics, impact of human activities and economic analysis required under Article 5, Annex II randr Annex III, and inventory of protected areas required under Article 6, Annex IV of the EU Water Framework Directivee (2000/60/EC) t s Part A – Basin-wide overviewÖ / / Short: “Danube Basin Analysis (WFD Roof Report 2004)” / / d n a l h c s t u e D / / / / The complete report consists of Part A: Basin-wide overview, and Part B: Detailed analysis of the Danube river basin countries 18 March 2005, Reporting deadline: 22 March 2005 Prepared by International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR) in cooperation with the countries of the Danube River Basin District. The Contracting Parties to the Danube River Protection Convention endorsed this report at the 7th Ordinary Meeting of the ICPDR on December 13-14, 2004. The final version of the report was approved 18 March 2005. Overall coordination and editing by Dr. Ursula Schmedtje, Technical Expert for River Basin Management at the ICPDR Secretariat, under the guidance of the River Basin Management Expert Group. ICPDR Document IC/084, 18 March 2005 International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River Vienna International Centre D0412 P.O.