Second Progress Report 2Nd Progress Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Second Progress Report 2Nd Progress Report Technical Assistance for a Study on Forest Biomass Energy Conversion: Second Progress Report Delivery Report Output 2.2: Report on geographical location of the hot spots of wood waste generation in the countries mapped supply chains 2nd Progress Report Presented to: CTCN Author: Climate and Energy (C&E) Advisory Ltd, Nairobi & S2 Services, Cameroon Date: 28/08/2020 Version: D2.2 A Report on geographical location of the hot spots of wood waste generation in the countries mapped supply chains 1 www.eclimateadvisory.comA Report on geographical location of the hot spots of wood waste generation in the countriesCitadel mapped of Resilience supply chains and Sustainability Contents DEFINITIONS OF COMMONLY USED TERMS ..................................................................................................... 8 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY ........................................................................................................... 10 1.2 TECHNICAL APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 12 2. QUANTIFICATION OF WASTE GENERATED AT EACH LINK IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN ..................................... 13 2.1 CLASSIFICATION OF BIOMASS RESIDUES ........................................................................................................... 13 2.1.1 Sawdust ......................................................................................................................................... 13 2.1.2 Scrap wood .................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1.3 Heartwood defects ........................................................................................................................ 14 2.1.4 Sawmill processing activities ......................................................................................................... 15 2.2 DEFINING FORMULAS FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF WOOD WASTE IN EACH LINK OF THE WOOD SUPPLY CHAIN .............. 16 2.2.1 Evaluation of approaches to quantify forest residues ................................................................... 16 2.2.2 Forest harvesting residues ............................................................................................................. 17 2.2.3 Direct or destructive methods ....................................................................................................... 17 2.2.4 Indirect non-destructive methods ................................................................................................. 17 2.2.5 Remote sensing ............................................................................................................................. 17 2.2.6 The geographical information system ........................................................................................... 18 2.2.7 Biomass estimation model ............................................................................................................ 18 2.2.8 Residues from wood processing plants ......................................................................................... 19 2.2.9 Calculation method ....................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.10 Survey methodology ...................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.11 Formulas and assumptions used to quantify forest residues ........................................................ 20 2.2.12 Logging Residues ........................................................................................................................... 20 2.2.13 Assumptions made and other methodological elements .............................................................. 20 2.2.14 Methodology for measuring logging residues ............................................................................... 21 2.2.15 Method for measuring wood processing residues......................................................................... 22 2.2.16 Data sources and resources for spatialization of residue potentials ............................................. 22 2.2.17 Priority Chain Links with Greater Potential to Generate Bioenergy Products ............................... 22 2.2.18 Results of the quantification of forest residues ............................................................................. 23 3. MAPPING OF POTENTIAL FOREST BIOMASS AVAILABILITY ..................................................................... 24 3.1 BIOMASS STOCK AND FOREST FUNCTION BY COUNTRY ........................................................................................ 24 3.1.1 Forest designated for industrial production by country ................................................................ 24 3.2 MAPPING OF POTENTIAL RESIDUES IN PRODUCTION FORESTS AND SAWMILLS BY REGION .......................................... 25 3.2.1 Central Africa ................................................................................................................................. 25 3.2.2 Case of Cameroon ......................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.3 Production forests ......................................................................................................................... 25 3.2.4 Wood Processing Units (Sawmills) ................................................................................................ 28 3.2.5 Case of Chad .................................................................................................................................. 29 3.2.6 Production forests ......................................................................................................................... 29 3.2.7 Wood processing units (Sawmills) ................................................................................................. 30 3.2.8 Republic of Congo ......................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.9 Production Forests ......................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.10 Wood processing units (Sawmills) ................................................................................................. 33 3.2.11 Case of the Democratic Republic of Congo .................................................................................... 36 3.2.12 Production Forests ......................................................................................................................... 36 3.2.13 Wood processing units (Sawmills) ................................................................................................. 37 3.2.14 The Case of Gabon ......................................................................................................................... 38 2 A Report on geographical location of the hot spots of wood waste generation in the countries mapped supply chains 3.2.15 Production Forests ......................................................................................................................... 38 3.2.16 Wood processing units (Sawmills) ................................................................................................. 39 3.2.17 Case of Equatorial Guinea ............................................................................................................. 40 3.2.18 Production Forests ......................................................................................................................... 40 3.2.19 Wood processing units (Sawmills) ................................................................................................. 41 3.2.20 Case of the Central African Republic ............................................................................................. 41 3.2.21 Production Forests ......................................................................................................................... 41 3.2.22 Wood processing units (Sawmills) ................................................................................................. 43 3.2.23 West Africa .................................................................................................................................... 43 3.2.24 Case of Benin ................................................................................................................................. 44 3.2.25 Case of Cote d'Ivoire ...................................................................................................................... 49 3.2.26 Production Forests ......................................................................................................................... 49 3.2.27 Wood Processing Units (Sawmills) ................................................................................................ 56 3.2.28 Case of Burkina Faso ..................................................................................................................... 59 3.2.29 Case of Senegal ............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • A Cohort Study to Identify Risk Factors for Plasmodium
    Yaro et al. Malar J (2020) 19:371 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03443-x Malaria Journal RESEARCH Open Access A cohort study to identify risk factors for Plasmodium falciparum infection in Burkinabe children: implications for other high burden high impact countries Jean Baptiste Yaro1,2, Alphonse Ouedraogo1, Z. Amidou Ouedraogo1, Amidou Diarra1, Malik Lankouande1, Efundem Agboraw3, Eve Worrall3, Kobié Hyacinthe Toe1, Antoine Sanou1,4, W. Moussa Guelbeogo1, N’Fale Sagnon1, Hilary Ranson3, Alfred B. Tiono1, Steven W. Lindsay2 and Anne L. Wilson3* Abstract Background: Progress in controlling malaria has stalled in recent years. Today the malaria burden is increasingly con- centrated in a few countries, including Burkina Faso, where malaria is not declining. A cohort study was conducted to identify risk factors for malaria infection in children in southwest Burkina Faso, an area with high insecticide-treated net (ITN) coverage and insecticide-resistant vectors. Methods: Incidence of Plasmodium falciparum infection was measured in 252 children aged 5 to 15 years, using active and passive detection, during the 2017 transmission season, following clearance of infection. Demographic, socio-economic, environmental, and entomological risk factors, including use of ITNs and insecticide resistance were monitored. Results: During the six-month follow-up period, the overall incidence of P. falciparum infection was 2.78 episodes per child (95% CI 2.66–2.91) by microscopy, and 3.11 (95% CI 2.95–3.28) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The entomological inoculation= rate (EIR) was 80.4 infective bites per= child over the six-month malaria transmission season. At baseline, 80.6% of children were reported as sleeping under an ITN the previous night, although at the last survey, 23.3% of nets were in poor condition and considered no longer protective.
    [Show full text]
  • Initiative Pour La Transparence Dans Les Industries Extractives
    INITIATIVE POUR LA TRANSPARENCE DANS LES INDUSTRIES EXTRACTIVES ITIE BURKINA FASO RAPPORT 2015 Mars 2017 Le présent rapport a été établi à la demande du Comité de Pilotage de l’Initiative pour la Transparence des Industries Extractives au Burkina Faso. Les avis qui y sont exprimés sont ceux de l’Administrateur Indépendant et ne reflètent en aucun cas l’avis officiel du Comité de Pilotage ITIE. Ce rapport est à usage exclusif du Comité de Pilotage ITIE et ne doit pas être utilisé par d’autres parties ni à des fins autres que celles auxquelles il est destiné. Rapport ITIE Burkina Faso Année 2015 TABLE DES MATIERES INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 5 Contexte ................................................................................................................................... 5 Objectif ................................................................................................................................... 5 Nature et périmètre des travaux ...................................................................................................... 5 1 SYNTHESE ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Revenus du secteur extractif .................................................................................................. 7 1.2 La production et les exportations du secteur extractif ............................................................ 8 1.3 Périmètre
    [Show full text]
  • Note Technique
    MINISTERE DE L’ENVIRONNEMENT ET DE L’EAU SECRETARIAT GENERAL DIRECTION GENERALE DE L’HYDRAULIQUE Gestion Intégrée des Ressources en Eau du Burkina Faso LE BILAN DES ÉCOSYSTÈMES HUMIDES ET DE LEUR VULNÉRABILITÉ FICHES TECHNIQUES ROYAUME DU DANEMARK Rapport technique n° RT-OTEG-R 1.6 MINISTERE DES AFFAIRES ETRANGERES DANIDA Assistance Technique Carl Bro – DHI/VKI - IWACO 1 S o m m a i r e Le lac de Tengréla (site n°1) _________________________________________________________3 Les Cascades de Karfiguéla (site n°2) __________________________________________________6 Les zones humides des Forêts Classées de Diéfoula et de Logoniégué (site n°3) ________________8 Plaine d’inondation de la Comoé et du Sinlo (site n° 4)___________________________________13 Plaine d’inondation de N’Dionkélé-Foulasso (site n°5)___________________________________15 La Mare aux Chauves-souris de Léra (site n°6) _________________________________________17 Plaine d’inondation de la Léraba orientale à Douna (partie non aménagée) (site n°7) __________22 Forêt galerie de la Guinguette (site n°8) _______________________________________________25 La Mare aux Hippopotames (site n° 9) ________________________________________________28 La Vallée du Sourou (site n°10)______________________________________________________35 Le Cône d’épandage de Banh (site n° 11) ______________________________________________40 Le Grand Balé (site n° 12) __________________________________________________________46 La Mare aux Crocodiles de Sabou (site n°13)___________________________________________49
    [Show full text]
  • Selon Le Dernier Rapport
    INITIATIVE POUR LA TRANSPARENCE DANS LES INDUSTRIES EXTRACTIVES ITIE BURKINA FASO RAPPORT 2014 Décembre 2016 Le présent rapport a été établi à la demande du Comité de Pilotage de l’Initiative pour la Transparence des Industries Extractives au Burkina Faso. Les avis qui y sont exprimés sont ceux de l’Administrateur Indépendant et ne reflètent en aucun cas l’avis officiel du Comité de Pilotage ITIE. Ce rapport est à usage exclusif du Comité de Pilotage ITIE et ne doit pas être utilisé par d’autres parties ni à des fins autres que celles auxquelles il est destiné. Rapport ITIE Burkina Faso Année 2014 TABLE DES MATIERES INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 5 Contexte……. ...........................................................................................................................……5 Objectif………. ................................................................................................................................. 5 Nature et périmètre des travaux ...................................................................................................... 5 1 SYNTHESE ............................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Revenus du secteur extractif .................................................................................................. 7 1.2 La production et les exportations du secteur extractif ............................................................ 8 1.3 Périmètre
    [Show full text]
  • Taoudeni Basin Report
    Integrated and Sustainable Management of Shared Aquifer Systems and Basins of the Sahel Region RAF/7/011 TAOUDENI BASIN 2017 INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF SHARED AQUIFER SYSTEMS AND BASINS OF THE SAHEL REGION EDITORIAL NOTE This is not an official publication of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). The content has not undergone an official review by the IAEA. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the IAEA or its Member States. The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the IAEA as to the legal status of such countries or territories, or their authorities and institutions, or of the delimitation of their boundaries. The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA. INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF SHARED AQUIFER SYSTEMS AND BASINS OF THE SAHEL REGION REPORT OF THE IAEA-SUPPORTED REGIONAL TECHNICAL COOPERATION PROJECT RAF/7/011 TAOUDENI BASIN COUNTERPARTS: Mr Adnane Souffi MOULLA (Algeria) Mr Abdelwaheb SMATI (Algeria) Ms Ratoussian Aline KABORE KOMI (Burkina Faso) Mr Alphonse GALBANE (Burkina Faso) Mr Sidi KONE (Mali) Mr Aly THIAM (Mali) Mr Brahim Labatt HMEYADE (Mauritania) Mr Sidi Haiba BACAR (Mauritania) EXPERT: Mr Jean Denis TAUPIN (France) Reproduced by the IAEA Vienna, Austria, 2017 INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF SHARED AQUIFER SYSTEMS AND BASINS OF THE SAHEL REGION INTEGRATED AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF SHARED AQUIFER SYSTEMS AND BASINS OF THE SAHEL REGION Table of Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Repartition Spatiale Des Infrastructures Et Des Services Sociaux De Base Dans La Region Des Cascades En 2015
    MINISTERE DE L’ECONOMIE BURKINA FASO ET DES FINANCES ………..………... …..……….... Unité-Progrès-Justice SECRETARIAT GENERAL ………..……….... DIRECTION GENERALE DES POLES DE CROISSANCE ET DE L’APPUI A LA DECENTRALISATION REPARTITION SPATIALE DES INFRASTRUCTURES ET DES SERVICES SOCIAUX DE BASE DANS LA REGION DES CASCADES EN 2015 Rapport final Programme de Renforcement de la Gouvernance Sous-composante Gouvernance économique (PRG-GE) Décembre 2015 TABLE DES MATIERES AVANT-PROPOS ................................................................................................................... III LISTE DES SIGLES ET ABREVIATIONS ............................................................................... IV RESUME .............................................................................................................................. VIII INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 PREMIERE PARTIE: CADRE GENERAL ................................................................................ 2 I- CONTEXTE ET JUSTIFICATION DE L’ETUDE ................................................................... 2 II- OBJECTIFS ET RESULTATS ATTENDUS ......................................................................... 3 III- METHODOLOGIE DE TRAVAIL ........................................................................................ 4 III-1- Collecte des données secondaires .................................................................................. 4 III-2-
    [Show full text]
  • 11.3. Zoning of Forest Reserves 11.3.1. Basic Idea of the Zoning
    11.3. Zoning of Forest reserves 11.3.1. Basic idea of the Zoning The most important fact regarding zoning of the Gouandougou and Kongouko forest reserves in relation to the basic policies of the management plan for these forest reserves is that the creation of such village organizations as GGFs and a GGF Union as implementing bodies of the management plan will be unrealistic for some time to come. Accordingly, it will be essential for the administration/Forest Service to develop the basics for participatory forest reserve management in the future while conducting the management work (including educational activities and the control of illegal activities, i.e. law enforcement). In other words, the Forest Service should try to enhance the involvement of local villagers in the management of these forest reserves through the use of forest resources in the reserves. When full-scale participatory forest reserve management commences following the establishment of GGFs and a GGF Union in the future, it will be necessary to review the management plan in place, including the zoning plan, with reference to the situation in the Bounouna and Toumousséni forest reserves. Figure 11.2 shows the zoning plan for the Gouandougou forest reserve and Kongouko forest reserve respectively. These two forest reserves are endowed with relatively rich natural resources and the dependence and development pressure of residents of villages near these forest reserves are comparatively low. Accordingly, zones to promote the use of forest products by local villagers will be set up near the villages concerned to provide incentives for local villagers to conserve forest resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Annuaire Statistique 2018 Des Cascades
    ANNUAIRE STATISTIQUE 2018 DES CASCADES de larégiondes Cascades Annuaire statistique 2018 Institut national de la statistique et de et delastatistique national Institut la démographie (INSD) la démographie Septembre 2019 Septembre Ministère de l'économie, des finances BURKINA FASO et du développement Unité - Progrès - Justice ----------------------------- Secrétariat général ----------------------------- Institut national de la statistique et de la démographie ----------------------------- Direction régionale des Hauts Bassins Annuaire statistique 2018 de la région des Cascades Septembre 2019 AVANT PROPOS L’Institut National de la Statistique et de la Démographie (INSD), à travers sa direction régionale des Hauts Bassins, a le plaisir de mettre à la disposition des utilisateurs l’annuaire statistique de la région des Cascades édition 2019. Ce document contient des informations démographiques, sociales, économiques, financières et environnementales se rapportant à la région et couvrant la période 2009- 2018. L’annuaire statistique est conçu dans un but premier de contribuer à une plus grande diffusion des statistiques produites par l’ensemble des producteurs sectoriels, dans la mesure de l’existence et de la qualité des données. Nous espérons que cette publication suscitera davantage chez les acteurs de la vie sociale et économique, en particulier ceux de la région, l’intérêt pour les statistiques et que chaque utilisateur pourra y trouver des points de repère et des références pour le guider et l’informer de l’évolution de la situation économique et sociale de la région des Cascades. Nous réitérons notre profonde gratitude aux services publics, notamment à tous les agents chargés des statistiques au sein de ces structures pour leur contribution combien indispensable à la réalisation du présent document et espérons que cette collaboration ira en s’intensifiant.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter9 Participatory Management Plan for Bounouna Forest Reserve
    Chapter9 Participatory Management Plan for Bounouna Forest Reserve 9. Participatory Management Plan for Bounouna Forest Reserve 9.1. Policy of the Management Plan Objectives :Rehabilitation of forest resources and promotion of management by establishing GGFs in related villages Expected :Forest Service, GGFs in related villages, NGOs, sawmills, Stakeholders citizens of Banfora (Structures) Main Activities :Planting trees, agro-forestry, countermeasures against bush fire, supervision of illegal activities, creation of recreational forests Incentives for :A share of the revenues from fuel woods which will be produced communities in plantations, and from agricultural products produced in agro-forestry fields Since forest resources have already been degraded by bush fires and fuel wood collection in Bounouna Forest Reserve, the main objectives of this management plan is thus the “Rehabilitation of forest resources”. Considering the incentives for communities, creating plantations with fuel wood species and introducing agro-forestry could be main activities in the initial phase of the management plan, although several other countermeasures are possible. An institutional management will be established whereby some of the planted trees (fuel woods trees) are systematically cut after their maturity, and the benefits of those products (fuel woods) are shared for communities. The benefits of the produce from agro-forestry fields will be shared with community as well. Given those shares of benefits to communities as incentives, their concern on forest reserve will be heightened and their involvement in “forest activities” encouraged. Then, it is expected that local villagers will spontaneously join management/conservation activities, i.e. controlling bush fires in plantations, monitoring illegal cutting, and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • Vrs - Burkina Faso
    VRS - BURKINA FASO Ouagadougou, le 27/10/2012BAGASSIBALE STATISTIQUES DES BUREAUX DE VOTES PAR COMMUNES \ ARRONDISSEMENTS REGION BOUCLE DU MOUHOUN PROVINCE BALE COMMUNE BAGASSI Secteur/Village Emplacement Bureau de vote Inscrits ASSIO ASSIO II\ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 219 BADIE ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 177 BAGASSI ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 542 BAGASSI TINIEYIO\ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 470 BANDIO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 253 BANOU ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 191 BASSOUAN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 201 BOUNOU ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 246 BOUNOU ECOLE2\ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 233 DOUSSI ECOLE B Bureau de vote 1 206 HAHO CENTRE\CENTRE ALPHABETISATION Bureau de vote 1 177 KAHIN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 258 KAHO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 273 KANA ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 269 KAYIO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 220 KOUSSARO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 305 MANA ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 495 MANA ECOLE Bureau de vote 2 264 MANZOULE HANGAR Bureau de vote 1 132 MOKO HANGAR Bureau de vote 1 308 NIAGA HANGAR Bureau de vote 1 128 NIAKONGO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 293 OUANGA HANGAR Bureau de vote 1 98 PAHIN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 278 SAYARO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 400 SIPOHIN ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 249 SOKOURA ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 152 VY ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 360 VY ECOLE2\ECOLE1 Bureau de vote 1 369 VYRWE MAGASIN Bureau de vote 1 127 YARO ECOLE Bureau de vote 1 327 Nombre de bureaux de la commune 31 Nombre d'inscrits de la commune 8 220 2 REGION BOUCLE DU MOUHOUN PROVINCE BALE COMMUNE BANA Secteur/Village Emplacement Bureau de vote Inscrits BANA KOKOBE\PREFECTURE Bureau de vote 1 353 BANA
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank Report No: ICR2327 Public Disclosure Authorized IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT (IDA-37450 IDA-3745A IDA-H0320 IDA-H6160) ON AN INITIAL CREDIT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 36.0 MILLION (US$49.5 MILLION EQUIVALENT) AND AN INITIAL GRANT Public Disclosure Authorized IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 30.9 MILLION (US$42.6 MILLION EQUIVALENT) AND AN ADDITIONAL GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR10.7MILLION (US$16.0 MILLION EQUIVALENT) FROM PILOT CRISIS RESPONSE WINDOW TO Public Disclosure Authorized BURKINA FASO FOR A TRANSPORT SECTOR PROJECT March 14, 2014 Transport Sector Country Department AFCF2 Public Disclosure Authorized Africa Region CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective March 31, 2013) Currency Unit = FCFA SDR 1.00 = US$1.50 US$1.00 = 450 FCFA FISCAL YEAR July 1 – June 30 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AGETIB Agence des Travaux d’Infrastructures du Burkina (Infrastructures Works Agency of Burkina) AF Additional Financing ANAC Agence Nationale de l’Aviation Civile (National Agency of Civil Aviation) ARV Antiretroviral CAS Country Assistance Strategy CBC Conseil Burkinabé des Chargeurs (Burkina Shippers Council) CCVA Centre de Contrôle des Véhicules Automobiles (Center for Automobile Control) CDMT Cadre des Dépenses à Moyen terme (Medium Term Expenditure Framework) CEA Cost-Effectiveness Analysis CFP Centre de Formation et de Perfectionnement (Training and Development Center) CGES Cellule de Gestion Environnementale et Sociale (Environmental and Social Management unit) CMLS Comité Ministeriel de Lutte contre le Sida (Ministerial
    [Show full text]
  • Ceni - Burkina Faso
    CENI - BURKINA FASO ELECTIONS COUPLEES PRESIDENTIELLE / LEGISLATIVES DU 22/11/2020 STATISTIQUES DES BUREAUX DE VOTE PAR COMMUNE / ARRONDISSEMENTS LISTE DEFINITIVE REGION : AFRIQUE PROVINCE : AFRIQUE DU SUD COMMUNE : PRETORIA AMBASSADE PRETORIA SECTEUR / VILLAGE LIEU EMPLACEMENT BUREAU DE VOTE NB_INSCRITS PRETORIA PRETORIA AMBASSADE Bureau de vote 1 85 Nombre de bureau de vote PRETORIA/AMBASSADE PRETORIA : 1 Nombre d'inscrits de la commune de PRETORIA/AMBASSADE PRETORIA :85 REGION : AFRIQUE PROVINCE : BENIN COMMUNE : COTONOU CONSULAT COTONOU SECTEUR / VILLAGE LIEU EMPLACEMENT BUREAU DE VOTE NB_INSCRITS COTONOU COTONOU CONSULAT Bureau de vote 1 494 COTONOU COTONOU CONSULAT Bureau de vote 2 286 Nombre de bureau de vote COTONOU/CONSULAT COTONOU : 2 Nombre d'inscrits de la commune de COTONOU/CONSULAT COTONOU :780 REGION : AFRIQUE PROVINCE : COTE D'IVOIRE COMMUNE : ABIDJAN AMBASSADE ABIDJAN SECTEUR / VILLAGE LIEU EMPLACEMENT BUREAU DE VOTE NB_INSCRITS ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade1 Bureau de vote 1 294 ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade1 Bureau de vote 2 294 ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade2 Bureau de vote 1 418 ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade4 Bureau de vote 1 299 ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade4 Bureau de vote 2 299 ABIDJAN AMB ABIDJAN Ambassade5 Bureau de vote 1 355 Nombre de bureau de vote ABIDJAN/AMBASSADE ABIDJAN : 6 Nombre d'inscrits de la commune de ABIDJAN/AMBASSADE ABIDJAN :1.959 REGION : AFRIQUE PROVINCE : COTE D'IVOIRE COMMUNE : ABIDJAN CONSULAT ABIDJAN SECTEUR / VILLAGE LIEU EMPLACEMENT BUREAU DE VOTE NB_INSCRITS ABIDJAN ABIDJAN CONSULAT2
    [Show full text]