DOCSLIB.ORG

Free France's Lion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page iii FREE FRANCE’S LION The Life of Philippe Leclerc, de Gaulle’s Greatest General WILLIAM MORTIMER MOORE Philadelphia & Newbury leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page iv Published in the United States of America and Great Britain in 2011 by CASEMATE PUBLISHERS 908 Darby Road, Havertown, PA 19083 and 17 Cheap Street, Newbury RG14 5DD Copyright 2011 © William Mortimer Moore ISBN 978-1-61200-068-8 Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-61200-080-0 Cataloging-in-publication data is available from the Library of Congress and the British Library. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, record - ing or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed and bound in the United States of America. For a complete list of Casemate titles please contact: CASEMATE PUBLISHERS (US) Telephone (610) 853-9131, Fax (610) 853-9146 E-mail: [email protected] CASEMATE PUBLISHERS (UK) Telephone (01635) 231091, Fax (01635) 41619 E-mail: [email protected] leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page v CONTENTS FOREWORD by Martin Windrow vii MAPS xi PREFACE—DEATH IN THE DESERT 1 CHAPTER 1: A TRUE SON OF FRANCE 15 CHAPTER 2: LA CHUT E— THE FALL OF FRANCE 51 CHAPTER 3: DE GAULLE’S MAN IN AFRICA 72 CHAPTER 4: ANNOYING THE ITALIANS 95 CHAPTER 5: CONSOLIDATING, RAIDING, AND PLANNING 125 CHAPTER 6: A VERY ENGLISH FRENCHMAN 158 CHAPTER 7: “A GIGANTIC EFFORT IS REQUIRED OF US” 193 CHAPTER 8: THE 2E DB IN ENGLAND 227 CHAPTER 9: FIRST BLOO D— ALENÇON 252 CHAPTER 10: “MOUVEMENT IMMÉDIAT SUR PARIS” 285 CHAPTER 11: DOMPAIRE AND BACCARAT 323 CHAPTER 12: THE LAST WINTER OF THE WAR 346 CHAPTER 13: A GOOD END TO A GOOD WAR 381 CHAPTER 14: INDOCHINE 405 CHAPTER 15: BACK TO FRENCH NORTH AFRICA 450 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 461 NOTES 463 BIBLIOGRAPHY 492 INDEX 497 leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page vi In memory of my great uncle, Geoffrey Bles, 1886 –1957, publisher of CS Lewis, Vicki Baum, Maria von Trapp and many others. leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page vii FOREWORD One of the central and most tragic consequences of France’s defeat, sur - render and occupation in 1940 was the range of practical and moral choices that confronted French soldiers of equal patriotism. The constantly chang - ing complexities of real life seldom offer clearcut moments of decision between courses of action with predictable, black-or-white consequences. The continuum of French politico-military history between 1940 and 1962 shows many examples of individuals choosing–under the practical and emotional pressures of the moment, and often for uncynical motives – paths that would lead them into unanticipated positions. The malign consequences of these choices could spoil (or even end) lives, and created spirals of hatred that lasted for more than the next generation. In the English language there are few accounts of that period that are thorough enough to carry us back beyond the easy conclusions of hind - sight, and thus to correct any hasty tendency to judge the men who shaped it in simplistic terms. This book is one of them–although it must be said at once that one of the author’s advantages, and the reader’s pleasures, is that its subject was as unambiguously admirable as any of the leading figures in French affairs during the 1940s. Philippe de Hautcloque, re - membered by his nom-de-guerre of Leclerc, was not only an honourable and skillful soldier, but also an attractive personality. vii leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page viii viii FREE FRANCE’S LION Wounded during the Battle of France in spring 1940, he twice escaped German captivity by exercising nerve and physical daring. He was of exactly the class and milieu to which Marshal Pétain’s Vichy regime, estab - lished in late June, should have had its strongest appeal—indeed, the extended de Hautcloque family was itself divided in its loyalites; yet when he was told of General De Gaulle’s broadcast from London, Leclerc unhesitatingly decided to risk everthing for the splendid but then-tiny flag of Free France. By August 1940 he was leading half-a-dozen men on a ‘James Bond’ mission in French West Africa, and by the end of that year he was organizing the first raids against the Italians in southern Libya, in co-operation with the British Long Range Desert Group. For the next two years, drawing upon his early experience of colonial soldiering in southern Morocco, he pursued the often frustrating task of building up a multi- national Free French brigade in this remote and fly-blown pre-Saharan backwater, and sending it into battle in realistic increments. It was a task that demanded, and revealed, all his energy and intelligence, and the charis - matic powers of leadership that enabled him to forge an effective group of subordinates from a wide spectrum of backgrounds, from Catholic aristo - crats like himself to brawlers like the future paratroop general Jacques Massu. When, in January 1943, Leclerc led his brigade northwards to join British Eighth Army in Tripolitania, this proud Frenchman even managed to cement a tolerably good relationship with the blindly undiplomatic General Montgomery. He was unshaken in his loyalty to De Gaulle during the intensely difficult period following the Anglo-American landings in French Morocco and Algeria, which led to bitter hostility between the ‘Gaullists of the first hour’ and Vichy’s French African Army. In August 1944 it was Leclerc’s 2nd Armoured Division that was given the honour of liberating central Paris, and by VE-Day his prestige among the Fighting French was unrivalled, despite the more senior command held by Jean de Lattre at the head of troops who had mostly only got back into the war on the right side in early 1943. While Leclerc was as decisive as any successful officer must be, one of his rarer qualities was the ability to change his opinions when they were contradicted by experience on the ground. He displayed this quality most strikingly during his senior command in French Indochina in 1946. Unlike leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page ix Foreword ix General De Gaulle, his experience of soldiering in co-operation with the British and Americans in World War II had not left Leclerc with the for - mer’s often paranoid suspicion of the ‘Anglo-Saxons’, and he was able to work constructively with Admiral Mounbatten in 1945. Nevertheless, he was at first unable to share British scepticism about the recreation of the pre-war white colonial empires in Asia, and he landed in Saigon deter - mined to achieve as much as he could for De Gaulle. He achieved a good deal, despite his inadequate military resources; but he also proved himself open to arguments and analysis from a number of quarters, both French and Indochinese. It takes a most unusual soldier to move beyond the aggressively patriotic instincts that have served him well in the past, and to develop a clear-eyed, long-term view of the political dimensions of his theatre of operations– and this, while men under his command are actually fighting and dying. That Leclerc’s heartfelt advice to his successor Emile Bollaert—‘Negotiate; above all, negotiate’—was in the end to come to nothing condemned France (and after her, the United States) to decades of costly sacrifices, for no eventual reward. Leclerc’s premature death in late 1947 robbed France of an intelligent, faithful and upright servant, whose prestige might have given weight to advice that a succession of weak governments would sorely need during the 1950s. The author’s research into a life lived among the movers and shakers of a period of great complexity has been admirably deep and wide, and he presents his clear, fair-minded and balanced conclusions in an extremely readable text, full of insights into the characters and relationships that shaped the events that he unfolds. This book is the work of a fine historian and a fine writer. MARTIN WINDROW Author of The Last Valley: Dien Bien Phu and the French Defeat in Vietnam leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page x x leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page xi MAPS leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page xii xii FREE FRANCE’S LION leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page xiii Maps xiii leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page xiv xiv FREE FRANCE’S LION leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page xv Maps xv leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page xvi xvi FREE FRANCE’S LION leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page xvii Maps xvii leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page xviii xviii FREE FRANCE’S LION leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page xix Maps xix leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page xx xx FREE FRANCE’S LION leclerc-layout_Layout 1 9/29/11 8:16 AM Page 1 PREFACE DEATH IN THE DESERT Madame la Générale Thérèse Leclerc de Hauteclocque knew her hus - band was wilting with exhaustion. It had been almost nine years since he last spent Christmas at home; nine years during which he never stopped at the business of war and she barely saw him.
Recommended publications
  • Unification of Italy 1792 to 1925 French Revolutionary Wars to Mussolini

    Unification of Italy 1792 to 1925 French Revolutionary Wars to Mussolini

    UNIFICATION OF ITALY 1792 TO 1925 FRENCH REVOLUTIONARY WARS TO MUSSOLINI ERA SUMMARY – UNIFICATION OF ITALY Divided Italy—From the Age of Charlemagne to the 19th century, Italy was divided into northern, central and, southern kingdoms. Northern Italy was composed of independent duchies and city-states that were part of the Holy Roman Empire; the Papal States of central Italy were ruled by the Pope; and southern Italy had been ruled as an independent Kingdom since the Norman conquest of 1059. The language, culture, and government of each region developed independently so the idea of a united Italy did not gain popularity until the 19th century, after the Napoleonic Wars wreaked havoc on the traditional order. Italian Unification, also known as "Risorgimento", refers to the period between 1848 and 1870 during which all the kingdoms on the Italian Peninsula were united under a single ruler. The most well-known character associated with the unification of Italy is Garibaldi, an Italian hero who fought dozens of battles for Italy and overthrew the kingdom of Sicily with a small band of patriots, but this romantic story obscures a much more complicated history. The real masterminds of Italian unity were not revolutionaries, but a group of ministers from the kingdom of Sardinia who managed to bring about an Italian political union governed by ITALY BEFORE UNIFICATION, 1792 B.C. themselves. Military expeditions played an important role in the creation of a United Italy, but so did secret societies, bribery, back-room agreements, foreign alliances, and financial opportunism. Italy and the French Revolution—The real story of the Unification of Italy began with the French conquest of Italy during the French Revolutionary Wars.
  • Jean-Paul Sartre and the Algerian Revolution: 1954-1962

    Jean-Paul Sartre and the Algerian Revolution: 1954-1962

    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] JEAN-PAUL SARTRE AND THE ALGERIAN REVOLUTION: 1954-1962 BY ABDELMADJID AMRANI B.A. ALGIERS UNIVERSITY, (1981) M. LiTT. GLASGOW UNIVERSITY, (1985) A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, PH.D. DEPARTMENT OF MODERN HISTORY FACULTY OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW FEBRUARY 1990 i ProQuest Number: 10970983 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10970983 Published by ProQuest LLC(2018). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author.
  • The Case the Hungarian Legion (1861-1862)

    The Case the Hungarian Legion (1861-1862)

    ISSN 2039-9340 Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 3 (11) November 2012 Volunteers’ Employment and Counterinsurgency in Italy: The Case the Hungarian Legion (1861-1862) Andrea Carteny, Ph.D. Assistant professor, Sapienza University of Rome Doi: 10.5901/mjss.2012.v3n11p397 Abstract In South-Italy the brigandage is a complex phenomenon, deeply popular and culturally reactionary: a “great brigandage” emerged in dangerous and structural forms after the fall of the last Bourbon king and the Italian unification under the Savoy dynasty, in 1861. From the “Mille” expedition and the conquest of redshirts leaded by Garibaldi, the Southern Army and the Italian Army fought against the brigandage as a real insurgency movement supported by Bourbons’ loyalists and Catholic environments. In the campaign of banditism’s repression a particular case was the employment of volunteers, as the former Garibaldi’s Hungarian Legion. From the General Staff Army’s Historical Archive the documents show both Command’s strategy and local tactics in the Hungarian practices. The concentration of the legionaries in Nocera (March 1861) and the growing number of effectives in few months (less than 1 thousand) gave the opportunity of their employment for more than 1 year in a large area of Southern regions. The Hungarian legionaries’ mutiny, in July 1862, rised at the same time of the Garibaldi’s expedition from South to Rome, blocked in August at the Aspromonte. After the disarm of the soldiers, the calling back to Torino meant the risk of his dissolution. Only a complete reorganization, in 1863, allowed to employ back a new Legion until 1867.
  • The French Factor in U.S

    The French Factor in U.S

    The French Factor in U.S. Foreign Policy during the Nixon-Pompidou Period, 1969-1974 Marc Trachtenberg Department of Political Science University of California at Los Angeles July 19, 2010 When Richard Nixon took office as president of the United States in early 1969, he and his national security advisor Henry Kissinger wanted to put America’s relationship with France on an entirely new footing. Relations between the two countries in the 1960s, and especially from early 1963 on, had been far from ideal, and U.S. governments at the time blamed French president Charles de Gaulle for the fact that the United States was on such poor terms with its old ally. But Nixon and Kissinger took a rather different view. They admired de Gaulle and indeed thought of themselves as Gaullists.1 Like de Gaulle, they thought that America in the past had been too domineering. “The excessive concentration of decision-making in the hands of the senior partner,” as Kissinger put it in a book published in 1965, was not in America’s own interest; it drained the alliance of “long-term political vitality.”2 The United States needed real allies—“self-confident partners with a strongly developed sense of identity”—and not satellites.3 Nixon took the same line in meetings both with de Gaulle in March 1969 and with his successor as president, Georges Pompidou, in February 1970. It was “not healthy,” he told Pompidou, “to have just two superpowers”; “what we need,” he said, “is a better balance in the West.”4 This paper was originally written for a conference on Georges Pompidou and the United States which was held in Paris in 2009.
  • Facing Jazz, Facing Trauma: Modern Trauma and the Jazz Archive

    Facing Jazz, Facing Trauma: Modern Trauma and the Jazz Archive

    Facing Jazz, Facing Trauma: Modern Trauma and the Jazz Archive By Tyfahra Danielle Singleton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature and the Designated Emphasis in Film Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Judith Butler, Chair Professor Chana Kronfeld Professor Linda Williams Fall 2011 Facing Jazz, Facing Trauma: Modern Trauma and the Jazz Archive Copyright © 2011 by Tyfahra Danielle Singleton Abstract Facing Jazz, Facing Trauma: Modern Trauma and the Jazz Archive by Tyfahra Danielle Singleton Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature University of California, Berkeley Professor Judith Butler, Chair ―Facing Jazz, Facing Trauma‖ posits American jazz music as a historical archive of an American history of trauma. By reading texts by Gayl Jones, Ralph Ellison, Franz Kafka; music and performances by Louis Armstrong and Billie Holiday; the life, art and films of Josephine Baker, and the film The Jazz Singer (1927), my goal is to give African American experiences of trauma a place within American trauma studies and to offer jazz as an extensive archive of testimony for witnessing and for study. Initially, I explore the pivotal historical moment where trauma and jazz converge on a groundbreaking scale, when Billie Holiday sings ―Strange Fruit‖ in 1939. This moment illuminates the fugitive alliance between American blacks and Jews in forming the historical testimony that is jazz. ―Strange Fruit,‖ written by Jewish American Abel Meeropol, and sung by Billie Holiday, evokes the trauma of lynching in an effort to protest the same.
  • The University of Chicago No Empire for Old Men: The

    The University of Chicago No Empire for Old Men: The

    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO NO EMPIRE FOR OLD MEN: THE YOUNG OTTOMANS AND THE WORLD, 1856-1878 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE HUMANITIES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF NEAR EASTERN LANGUAGES AND CIVILIZATIONS BY MADELEINE ELFENBEIN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2017 Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... v Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 A Popular Response to the Crisis of Sovereignty .................................................................... 2 Saving the State from Itself ....................................................................................................... 5 Ottomanism and the International Turn ............................................................................... 16 Who Were The Young Ottomans? .......................................................................................... 19 Young Ottoman Legacies ........................................................................................................ 22 Outline of Chapters .................................................................................................................. 25 Chapter 1: A Nation in Search
  • The Career of Maurice Papon from Vichy France to the Algerian War

    The Career of Maurice Papon from Vichy France to the Algerian War

    Duty, Death and the Republic: The Career of Maurice Papon from Vichy France to the Algerian War Stephanie Hare London School of Economics and Political Science June 2008 Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of PhD in International History, Department of International History, LSE. 1 UMI Number: U613400 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U613400 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Library of Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party.
  • Midwestern Editorial Viewpoints on the Unification of Italy: 1846-1870

    Midwestern Editorial Viewpoints on the Unification of Italy: 1846-1870

    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1938 Midwestern Editorial Viewpoints on the Unification of Italy: 1846-1870 Alphons Francis Kuhn Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Kuhn, Alphons Francis, "Midwestern Editorial Viewpoints on the Unification of Italy: 1846-1870" (1938). Master's Theses. 3465. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/3465 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1938 Alphons Francis Kuhn MIDWESTERN EDITORIAL VIEvVPOD~TS ON THE UNIFICATION OF ITALY, 1846-1870. by ALPHONS FRANCIS KUHN, S. J. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN LOYOLA UNIVERSITY JUNE, 1938. TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1 CHAPTER I. SOURCES OF EDITORIAL COMMENT •••••••••••• 6 CHAPTER II. RELIGIOUS PREJUDICE ••••••••.•••••.•••••• 12 CHAPTER III. ANTI-CLERICAL AND ANTI-PAPAL SENTIMENTS. 27 CHAPTER IV. DEFENSE OF LIBERALISM •••••••••••••..•.•• 66 CHAPTER v. PATRIOTISM AND POLITICAL AFFILIATIONS ••• 85 APPENDIX A. • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• "' • • • • • • • • 98 A?PENDIX B • • ........................ •, • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 99 BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................... ~-····.;. ...........•• 105 1. INTRODUCTION. On reading the title it may be remarked that Marraro 1 and Feiertag have treated the subject quite comprehensively. This paper is not an attempt either to question or contradict their findings, but rather to supplement the work already ac­ complished.
  • L'entourage De Charles De Gaulle Président Du

    L'entourage De Charles De Gaulle Président Du

    Bernard Lachaise, « L’entourage de Charles de Gaulle président du GPRF à Paris, (25 août 1944-21 janvier 1946) », Histoire@Politique. Politique, culture, société, N°8, mai-août 2009. www.histoire-politique.fr L’entourage de Charles de Gaulle président du GPRF à Paris (25 août 1944-21 janvier 1946) Bernard Lachaise Un entourage ou plusieurs entourages ? Georges Pompidou, qui a appartenu au cabinet civil du président du GPRF, en évoque « au moins trois : le secrétariat général du Gouvernement (…), les officiers d’ordonnance ensuite (…), enfin, le Cabinet divisé lui-même en cabinet civil et cabinet militaire1 ». Seul « le Cabinet » dans toutes ses dimensions – celui du Président dont les officiers d’ordonnance, le cabinet civil et le cabinet militaire », c’est-à-dire les collaborateurs les plus directs du général de Gaulle, fait l’objet de cette étude2. Le cabinet du général de Gaulle au temps du Gouvernement provisoire de la République française à la Libération, à Paris (25 août 1944-21 janvier 1946) n’est pas terra incognita pour les historiens mais il s’agit ici, dans le cadre d’une réflexion sur les entourages politiques, de mettre l’accent sur les hommes qui le composent, leur sociologie, leur passé, leur recrutement et leur devenir3. Si une majorité des membres du cabinet du Président est entrée dans l’histoire ultérieure de la République, à l’image du directeur de cabinet, Gaston Palewski, des directeurs adjoints, René Brouillet, Geoffroy de Courcel, Louis Vallon, de chargés de mission comme Michel Debré, André Malraux ou Jean Monnet et de quelques membres du cabinet civil comme Etienne Burin des Roziers, Jean-Marc Boegner, Jean Sauvagnargues, Jean Donnedieu de Vabres, Claude Mauriac ainsi, bien sûr, que de Georges Pompidou, les autres sont, pour la plupart, moins connus et largement oubliés4.
  • Albania Vote Demand After Launch As Planned

    Albania Vote Demand After Launch As Planned

    • HIGH TIDE LOW TIDE 2-17-65 • 2-17-65 5.3 AT 0548 0.3 AT 1148 5.9 AT 1802 VOL 6 NO 1929 KWAJALEIN, MARSHALL ISLANDS TUESDAY 16 FEBRUARY 1965 NATIONALIST CHINESE KREMLIN SAYS U.S. MUST BEAR REPORT RED BUILDUP CONSEQUENCES FOR WORLD WAR TAIPEI, FEB. 16 (UPI)--NATIONALIST Moscow, FEB. 16, (UPI)--MoScow RADIO SAID TODAY THE UNITED STATES AIR CHINESE INTELLIGENCE SOURCES WERE STRIKES AGAINST NORTH VIET NAM COULD LEAD TO A WORLD WAR. IT SAID THE II RE - ~ QUOTED TODAY AS SAYING THAT COMMUNIST SPONSIBILITY F"OR THE DIRE CONSEQUENCES F"OR SUCH A POLICY REST WITH AMERICA." CHINA HAS SENT NEARLY 150 JET AIRCRAF"T "THE F"LAMES OF" WAR STARTING IN ONE PLACE COULD EASILY SPREAD TO NEIGHBOR­ TO AIRFIELDS NEAR THE BORDER or NORTH ING COUNTRIES AND, IN THE F"INAL COUNT EMBRACE THE WHOLE WORLD," Moscow RADIO VIET NAM. SAID IN AN ENGLISH-LANGUAGE PROGRAM BEAMED TO NORTH AMERICA. THE ENGLISH-LANGUAGE CHINA POST SAID THE BROADCAST WAS MADE THE DAY AF"TER SOVIER PREMIER ALEXEI KOSYGIN RETURNED ITS SOURCES WERE CLAIMING THE COMMUN­ F"ROM A 10-DAY TRIP THAT TOOK HIM TO NORTH VIET NAM, PEKING, AND NORTH KOREA. ISTS HAVE SENT A TOTAL OF "NINE SQUAD­ THE KREMLIN BROADCAST SAID "THE SITUATION THAT IS DEVELOPING IN SOUTH VIET RONS" -- OR 144 PLANES -- TO FIELDS IN NAM ••• IS A DANGER THAT REALLY EXISTS ITS BORDER PROVINCES. AND RESPONSIBILITY F"ALLS WHOLLY ON THE UNITED STATES." GIANT SATURN SCORES FIRST HIT Moscow RADIO SAID "JUDGING F"ROM RE­ PORTS THE UNITED STATES IS MAKING WITH ORB IT I NG"BAT SATELL ITE'~ CAPE KENNEDY, FEB.
  • After Giuseppe Garibaldi's Death in 1882, a Group of Wash

    After Giuseppe Garibaldi's Death in 1882, a Group of Wash

    Giuseppe Garibaldi (1807–1882) Giuseppe Garibaldi rose from modest fter Giuseppe Garibaldi’s death in 1882, a group of Wash- beginnings to become one of Italy’s fore- ington, D.C., residents of Italian descent formed the most military heroes. Born in 1807 in Nice, Garibaldi became a sailor, a merchant cap- Society for a Monument to Garibaldi. They commissioned tain, and an officer in the Piedmont-Sardinia Giuseppe Martegana, an Italian artist living in Paris, to navy. In 1834 he fled to France after partic- create a bust to commemorate the patriot. In a letter to ipating in an unsuccessful mutiny, fomented the president of the Senate dated December 14, 1887, Dr. Tullio de in part to spark a republican revolution in A Piedmont-Sardinia. By 1836 Garibaldi was Suzzara-Verdi offered the Garibaldi bust, executed in Italian marble, living in South America, where he gained to the United States. He asked on behalf of the society that it be accepted fame as a revolutionary mercenary fighting in Brazil and Uruguay. “as a link in the chain of sympathy that all free men feel for the cham- In 1848 Garibaldi set out for Italy pions of liberty and popular government.” The work also was presented with his band of “Redshirts.” Garibaldi as an expression of Italian achievement in sculpture. On August 23, and his men joined the Risorgimento, a movement to unify the disparate Italian 1888, the Senate approved the acquisition, resolving that “the Senate states by wresting Italian territory from for- of the United States expresses its sense of eign powers.
  • Il Gattopardo

    Il Gattopardo

    National Solidarity, Toxic Nationalism, European Inner Edges: Stendhal and Tolstoy in Malraux’s Les Noyers de l’Altenburg and Lampedusa’s Il Gattopardo John Burt Foster 317 George Mason University In international surveys of broadly Western fiction from (say) Proust, Joyce, Faulkner, and Kafka to Nabokov, Calvino, García Márquez, and Coetzee, criticism tends to neglect figures whose work does not fit into a modernism-to-postmodern trajectory and who seem, as well, to have lacked a steady commitment to the novel. Such is the case with the two authors at the heart of this essay, André Malraux (1901-76) and Giuseppe di Lampedusa (1896-1957), whose fiction, though widely read and certainly worthy of serious attention, seems neither as innovative nor as influential as this twentieth-century mainstream. Given their efforts to recapture the feel of particu- lar times and places, their emphasis on notable public events set in their historical context, and their less clearly adventurous narrative methods, it might be tempting to view them as neorealist throwbacks to the nineteenth century, notwithstanding Malraux’s close ties to surrealism and to modern painting or Lampedusa’s interest in psychoanalysis. Lampedusa, moreover, waited until his final years to start writing fiction. His one novel Il Gattopardo (The Leopard, 1958) only appeared after his death, when it became a best-seller in Italy and a critical success. If Malraux, by contrast, gained a major reputation with the five novels from Les Conquérants (The Conquerors, 1928) to L’Espoir (Man’s Hope, 1937), he eventually turned almost exclusively to politics, art criticism, and autobiography.