DOCSLIB.ORG

Ethnic Groups of Viet – Muong Languages and Dong Son Culture

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ethnic Groups of Viet – Muong Languages and Dong Son Culture Vietnam Social Sciences, No. 4(168) - 2015 Ethnic Groups of Viet – Muong Languages and Dong Son Culture Bui Xuan Dinh * Abstract: The archaeological data have convincingly proved that the Dong Son (Đông Sơn) culture resulted from the indigenous development of the previous pre-Đông Sơn cultural systems in the basins of the Hồng, Mã and Cả rivers, closely associating people and ancient Vietnamese culture. The ethnological and linguistic data demonstrate the close relationship of language and culture between the Việt and Mường peoples, and other ethnic groups of Viet – Muong (Việt – Mường) language. There are a lot of convincing data to confirm that the Việt and Mường peoples once shared an origin and they themselves were the owners of the pre-Đông Sơn and Đông Sơn cultures, closely connected with the ancient Vietnamese civilization. Key words: Ethnic, Việt – Mường languages, Đông Sơn culture. 1. Nativeness and continuity of the - The owners of Phùng Nguyên Culture cultures during the period from Phùng were direct ancestors of Mường people in Nguyên to Đông Sơn culture Vietnam. They inherently were Mon, Man It has been 90 years, since Đông Sơn and Mân Việt people, whose ancient ancestors culture was discovered. Many aspects of were the very ancient Đản people – one of this culture have been decoded, providing the Mongoloid groups that spoke South important materials to elucidate significant Asian languages; they were the very owner issues in the history of Vietnam at the time of the Neolithic culture in Tanshishan, Fujian of national foundation. There are, however, due northeast of Guangdong (China). They still controversies surrounding some issues, came to Vietnam and Thailand by the sea. including the owner of Đông Sơn culture. At first, they earned a living by doing As there were not many archaeological harvesting and hunting in coastal and evidences available in Vietnam, in the surrounding areas of estuaries. And then, 1960s some scholars tried to find out the they started to grow rice and do gardening, origin of Đông Sơn culture on the basis of setting up step-by-step cultures such as overseas materials, such as those from the Phùng Nguyên, Đồng Đậu, Gò Mun in the Eurasian steppe (Janse, 1947), the Huai Red River Delta. They had an originally close River culture (Kargren, 1942), and Black and direct relationship with the Neolithic Sea Costal culture (Geldern, 1951). cultures, of which the date is earlier than Recently, in the book titled “The origin that of the cultures in Fujian, Guangdong, of Việt and Mường people” published in Taiwan, and Sichuan (4,000 BP).(*) 2013, Tạ Đức – the author – developed the ideas that Đào Duy Anh and Bình Nguyên Lộc used to raise in the past, as below: (*) Assoc. Prof., Ph.D., Institute of Anthropology. 82 Ethnic Groups of Viet – Muong Languages... - The true owners of Đông Sơn culture advocated by archaeological as well as were La Va people, or Lạc Việt people, who other materials. In the Late Neolithic and came from Zhejiang to Vietnam after Mường the Early Iron Era, Hạ Long culture was people (more or less 3,000 years ago). Basically, already formed in the Northeast coastal area the foundation and development of Đông of Vietnam. This culture originated from Sơn culture are closely attached with migration Cái Bèo culture (in the Mid-Neolithic Era, of Baiyue people from the North. as demonstrated by artifacts found in the According to this explanation, there was layers of this vestige). In Cái Bèo vestige, not a common Việt – Mường ethnic group, ones found small quadrangular handaxes, which would be then split into Việt people Phùng Nguyên-like ceramic tripods, and and Mường people as seen at present. some ceramic pieces pressed smoothly and Moreover, the both groups of people were caved with decorative designs that are similar not native people in Northern Vietnam, but to those of Phùng Nguyên Culture (Nguyễn they were just “a general combination of Khắc Sử: 127-136). groups that migrated from the North” (Tạ During the following period, Nguyễn Đức, 2013: 104). Việt outlined some connections between For the past over fifty years, however, historical events in the time of Thục Phán – hundreds of archaeological vestiges dating King An Dương Vương (including Cổ Loa back to the Iron Age have been discovered Citadel, the Kingdom of Âu Lạc, and the in North Vietnam. They are genealogized as failure of Thục Phán) and relics of Kele below: Phùng Nguyên - Đồng Đậu - Gò Culture in Guizhou, China (Nguyễn Việt, Mun - Đông Sơn in the Red River Delta. It 2010). Tạ Đức argues that Thục Phán-An is viewed as the main process of foundation Dương Vương was a prince of the Chinese and development of Đông Sơn culture - the state of Shu; he was a member of the Qishi ancient Viet civilization. The native origin Royal family of La/Lạc Việt descents; “Vac of Đông Sơn culture has been, therefore, Village was the very destination of migration gradually elucidated. Most of all researchers of the noble family Dian” (Tạ Đức, 2013). have come to a common conclusion that According to the above-mentioned arguments, owners of the genealogy of Phùng Nguyên Thục Phán - An Dương Vương, who ruled – Đồng Đậu – Gò Mun – Đông Sơn were Lạc over the Kingdom of Âu Lạc at the most Việt people; i.e. ancient Việt people – the prosperous time of Đông Sơn culture, had ancestor of modern-day Việt and Mường people Chinese origin. However, Trình Năng Chung (Institute of Archaeology, 1994). Phùng Nguyên showed fundamental differences between Culture originated from North Vietnam and Đông Sơn and Kele cultures, which were it is viewed as “the beginning” of the pre- clearly demonstrated by artifacts, burial customs, Đông Sơn cultures, which then developed and economic mode. Although those cultures continuously through periods to become had a certain connection, basically they Đông Sơn culture in the Red River Delta. were different from each other. It is very The arguments of Tạ Đức were not difficult to find out any traces of Đông Sơn 83 Vietnam Social Sciences, No. 4(168) - 2015 cultural quintessence in the relics of Kele rule of voiceless pronunciation, the rule of culture; and vice versa, the influence of monosyllabic words, and the rule of nasal Kele culture on Đông Sơn is also very little pronunciation (studied by Nguyễn Tài Cẩn, (Trình Năng Chung, 2014). M. Ferlus, and Trần Tri Dõi), linguistic All the research findings obtained in scholars have affirmed that Việt language is archaeology, anthropology, and linguistics one of the languages in the Việt-Mường demonstrate that Việt people and Mường category (some scholars have further classified people have a very close relationship and it as a language in the sub-category of Việt- they share a common origin. Of all the Chứt languages). In the South-asiatic language disciplines, the linguistics plays a very family and the entire Continental Southeast important role in this matter. It is not only Asia as well, Indochina is viewed as the one of the first signs as well as one important major center for formation of the South- criterion to identify ethnic groups, but it is asiatic languages (Nguyễn Hữu Hoành also a basis to determine the origin and the (chief author), 2013: 92). Languages in the relationship among ethnic groups. The history sub-category of Việt-Chứt still maintain of languages is the very history of ethnic some common features of the South-asiatic groups and their relationships. Language is language family and some common features relatively “conservative”, compared with of the Môn-Khmer branch. There are different other cultural factors. According to the opinions about the initial location of Việt- Swadesh method (glottochronology) that Chứt language though, all scholars have identifies two languages that were split from agreed that those, who spoke this language, the same original language, the proportion migrated to many places, of which one of original vocabularies that remain after significant group moved to plain areas in 1,000 years and 2,000 years is 74% and the lower valley of North Vietnam, where 54% relatively (Nguyễn Tài Cẩn, 1995). they did wet rice cultivation and the cradle Based on comparisons of historical languages, of Viet people was formed afterwards. Vietnamese as well as international linguistic Recently, the Institute of Linguistics has scholars have found a lot of similarities in identified Việt language and Mường pronunciation, tone, and fundamental language as two among 11 languages of the vocabularies between Việt, Mường, Thổ, Vietic sub-branch in the Môn-Khmer branch, and Chứt languages. Especially, the similarity South Asiatic language family (Nguyễn between Việt language and Mường language Hữu Hoành (chief author), 2013: 51). is so great that many linguistic scholars The above-mentioned similarities between hesitantly consider them as two languages Việt language and Mường language make it or two dialects of the same language. By favorable for communication between people showing phonetic rules that illustrate Viet of the two ethnic groups. After moving and Mường languages were split from a from home (a place in the plain) to an area common language, including: the rule of of Mường people and staying there for a tone (established by Haudricort A.G), the couple of weeks, a Việt person can understand 84 Ethnic Groups of Viet – Muong Languages... and even speak Mường language. The similarity describes similarities between patterns on in pronunciation and basic vocabularies is the upper hem of Mường women’s skirts the most typical for language similarities and designs on the bronze Đông Sơn between the two ethnic groups. It is completely kettledrums – the symbolic product of the different from language similarities between ancient Việt civilization.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Who Invented the Bronze Drum? Nationalism, Politics, and a Sino- Vietnamese Archaeological Debate of the 1970S and 1980S
    Who Invented the Bronze Drum? Nationalism, Politics, and a Sino- Vietnamese Archaeological Debate of the 1970s and 1980s XIAORONG HAN EVER SINCE THE BIRTH OF MODERN ARCHAEOLOGY in the nineteenth cen­ tury, nationalism and politics have been important factors in its development, and as such, archaeologists in various parts of the world have been actively in­ volved in the construction of ethnic and/or national origins and identities, the corroboration of national myths, the disputes over territories and cultural inven­ tions, and so on (Diaz-Andreu and Champion 1996; Hudson 1999; Kohl and Fawcett 1995; Meskell 1998; Pai 2000; Silberman 1989; Trigger 1984). Although it is difficult to find a single country in which archaeology is completely free from the influence of nationalism and politics, it is understandable to find that archae­ ologists operating in authoritarian systems generally have a stronger tendency to develop a close relationship with the nation-state and involve themselves in poli­ tics because of a lack of academic freedom and independent sources of financial support. Nazi Germany, early twentieth-century Japan, and pre-World War II Soviet Union are extreme examples of the politicization of archaeology (Arnold and Hassman 1995; Hudson 1999: 35, 44; Shnirelman 1996; Trigger 1989: 178­ 179; Wiwjorra 1996). In post-war Asia, archaeologists in China and Viet Nam were actively engaged in the development of a new wave of nationalist archaeol­ ogy under the encouragement and sponsorship of the state (Glover 1999; Tong 1995). ' This paper intends to study the nationalist archaeology of China and Viet Nam in the 1970s and 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-Holocene Hunter-Gatherers ‘Gaomiao’ in Hunan, China: the First of the Two-Layer Model in the Population History of East/Southeast Asia
    4 Mid-Holocene Hunter-Gatherers ‘Gaomiao’ in Hunan, China: The First of the Two-layer Model in the Population History of East/Southeast Asia Hirofumi Matsumura, Hsiao-chun Hung, Nguyen Lan Cuong, Ya-feng Zhao, Gang He and Zhang Chi Gaomiao, the eponymous archaeological site of the Gaomiao Culture (ca. 7500–5500 BP) has produced evidence of a unique hunter-gatherer society in Hunan Province, China, that produced fine decorated pottery. The human remains unearthed from this site provided an excellent opportunity to assess phenotypic and biological relationships between the Gaomiao and prehistoric and modern human populations that have inhabited East/Southeast Asia over the past ca. 10,000 years through cranial morphometrics. The assessment of morphometric affinity presented here addresses the peopling of East Asia, particularly in the context of the ‘two-layer’ hypothesis describing the population history of this region. The results suggest that the Gaomiao skeletons inherited genetic signatures from early colonising populations of Late Pleistocene southern Eurasian origin to a certain extent, and might share a common ancestry with present-day Australian Aboriginal and Melanesian people. Introduction The study of the population history of East Asia remains complex due to various migration processes and intermixing of populations throughout prehistory, poor archaeological sample sizes and limited radiometric dating. In general terms, East Asia is thought to have been originally inhabited by (to use the classic term) ‘Mongoloid’ peoples from the Late Pleistocene onwards. In the Late Pleistocene and early Holocene of Southeast Asia, several sets of human remains exhibit Australo-Melanesian characteristics, and it has been argued that an indigenous population possessing this morphological form occupied Southeast Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Austronesian Vernacular Architecture and the Ise Shrine of Japan: Is There Any Connection?
    Austronesian vernacular architecture and the Ise Shrine of Japan: Is there any connection? Ezrin Arbi Department of Architecture Faculty of Built Environment Universityof Malaya Abst ract In spite of so many varieties of form and detail of construction found in Southeast Asian vernacular buildings, there are some recurring features and shared characteristics that bind them together. The vast territories in which this phenomenon exists, known as the "Austronesian world", does no t include Japan. However, there is an intriguing resemblance between the architectural style of Japanese vernacular heritage of the earlier period with that of Austronesia. This paper is an attempt to explain the relation between the two using the findings of studies by archaeological, linguistic, sociological and anthropological experts based on the link between culture, langu age and ve rnacular architect ure. Introduction the form of (i) ideas, (ii) activities and (iii) In order to see the link between artifacts. The first is abstract in nature; it language and architecture this pap er is not visible and exists only in the mind will necessarily be preceded with a brief of those who subscribe to it. The second discussion on the concept of culture. form is men's complex activities in their One of the earlier meanings was given interaction with each other; they are by Tylor (1871) (in Firth ed.1960:2), who concrete and observable. The third form of defined culture as "tha t complex whole culture, which is the most concrete, is the which includes knowled ge, beliefs, ar t, result of human activit ies in their social morals, laws, customs and all other intercourse that requires the creation capabilities and habits acquired by man and making of new tools, instruments, as a member of a society".
    [Show full text]
  • 1 LỜI NÓI ĐẦU Kính Thưa Quý Thầy, Cô, Các Bạn Sinh Viên Thân Mến
    LỜI NÓI ĐẦU Kính thưa quý Thầy, Cô, Các bạn sinh viên thân mến, Với tinh thần “học tốt để có một nghề nghiệp vững chắc, một tương lai tươi sáng cùng khát vọng vươn xa”, chúng em – sinh viên các dòng lớp HD03 – 10, QTLH 03 – 10 khoa Lữ hành – cùng bắt tay thực hiện quyển sổ tay từ ngữ Việt – Anh – chuyên ngành lữ hành. Quyển sổ tay bao gồm 878 từ liên quan đến các tuyến du lịch đi và về trong ngày: 438 từ - Tuyến nội thành Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 180 từ - Tuyến Củ Chi. 260 từ - Tuyến TPHCM – Tiền Giang – Bến Tre. Hơn 6 tháng cùng thu thập tài liệu và biên soạn quyển sổ tay, chúng em đã học được nhiều điều bổ ích. Trong thời gian thực hiện quyển sổ tay, chúng em đã nhận được sự quan tâm và chỉ đạo của Ban Giám hiệu đồng thời là Ban cố vấn. Những bản thảo của chúng em được cô Dương Thị Kim Phụng và cô Đoàn Thị Kiều Nga cẩn thận chỉnh sửa nhiều lần. Thầy Nguyễn Hữu Công đã rất nhiệt tình hỗ trợ chúng em về mặt kỹ thuật. Chúng em trân trọng kính gởi đến quý Thầy, Cô lời chân thành cảm ơn vì tất cả những gì Thầy Cô đã luôn dành cho chúng em và các bạn sinh viên trong trường. Chúng em xin được xem việc biên soạn quyển sổ tay như một trong những hoạt động của sinh viên khoa Lữ hành trong chuổi các hoạt động kỷ niệm 25 năm thành lập trường Cao đẳng Nghề Du lịch Sài Gòn (1991 – 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Completion Report
    COMPLETION REPORT Geographically, both Vietnam and Japan are located close to China, which accounts for the influences exerted by the latter on the former at the different periods. Therefore, there should be research into the inevitable similarities shared by Vietnam and Japan in this process. At the same time, either of the two nations has had its own path for the development of their indigenous cultures, despite the same impact from China. In addition, naturally, both Vietnam and Japan have exerted their influence, to some extent, on China culture. 1. Influence of Chinese culture on the Dong Son culture. DongSon culture (7 th century BC- 1 th-2nd centuries AD) spread mostly in North Vietnam. Chinese artifacts found in Dong Son sites demonstrated this problem: 1-1. Bronze “qo” (a kind of weapon): A lot of bronze “qo” were discovered in Dong Son culture’s sites: Dong Son, Dong Den, Doi Da, Nui Voi… Recently, in famous Go De site (Lam Thao district, Phu Tho province) in 2003 we excavated one bronze “qo” that is decorated as many bronze “qo” in Shizhaishan site in Yunnan, south China (Qo was discovered in grave H6M1 in Go De site). 1-2. Bronze mirrors those were found in Dong Son culture were predominant among the bronze objects imported from China. There were Chinese mirrors in later Dong Son culture sites when Han dynasty invaded North Vietnam in 111 B.C. 1-3. Bronze ploughshares were found in both Dong Son and Dien cultures. Co Loa site, Dong Anh district, Ha Noi was discovered in 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Warp Patterned Textiles of the Cham in Vietnam
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings Textile Society of America 2008 Supplementary Warp Patterned Textiles of the Cham in Vietnam Michael C. Howard Simon Fraser University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsaconf Part of the Art and Design Commons Howard, Michael C., "Supplementary Warp Patterned Textiles of the Cham in Vietnam" (2008). Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings. 99. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/tsaconf/99 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Textile Society of America at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Textile Society of America Symposium Proceedings by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Supplementary Warp Patterned Textiles of the Cham in Vietnam Michael C. Howard [email protected] The Cham People The Malayo-Polynesian speaking peoples of Vietnam and Cambodia speak languages belonging to the Malayic group of Sundic languages. Sundic speaking peoples lived on the island of Borneo prior to their spreading to adjacent regions. From Borneo they sailed north to Vietnam, west to peninsular Malaysia and Sumatra, and south to Java and Bali. While Sundic speaking groups appear to have migrated to parts of Indonesia as early as 1500 BC, they do not seem to have arrived along the coast of Vietnam until some time around 600 BC. It is during the period 600 BC to 300 BC that Malayic groups, including the ancestors of the Malayo-Polynesian speaking peoples of Vietnam and Cambodia, migrated to eastern Sumatra, Peninsular Malaysia, and Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Văn Hóa Đông Sơn: 90 Năm Phát Hiện Và Nghiên Cứu*
    Tạp chí Khoa học xã hội Việt Nam, số 5(78) - 2014 VĂN HÓA ĐÔNG SƠN: 90 NĂM PHÁT HIỆN VÀ NGHIÊN CỨU* TRÌNH NĂNG CHUNG** Tóm tắt: Bài viết nêu lên quá trình phát hiện và nghiên cứu văn hóa Đông Sơn trong 90 năm qua. Việc xác lập văn hoá Đông Sơn là công lao thuộc về các học giả nước ngoài ở nửa đầu thế kỷ trước, còn những nỗ lực nhằm làm sáng tỏ mọi khía cạnh của nền văn hoá này thuộc về nhiều thế hệ các nhà nghiên cứu khảo cổ học Việt Nam. Bài viết cũng đề cập đến những nhận thức cơ bản về văn hóa Đông Sơn, như đặc trưng phân bố, đặc trưng hiện vật, niên đại và các giai đoạn phát triển, đời sống kinh tế, đời sống tinh thần, sự phân hóa xã hội và hình thành Nhà nước sơ khai và mối quan hệ giữa văn hóa Đông Sơn với các nền văn hóa trong khu vực lân cận. Từ khóa: Văn hóa Đông Sơn, phát hiện, nghiên cứu. 1. Những chặng đường phát hiện hiện ở Đông Sơn gây sự chú ý của các và nghiên cứu học giả nghiên cứu trong khu vực. Năm 1.1. Đúng 90 năm trước, mùa hè năm 1934, Heine Geldern R, nhà khảo cổ học 1924, di tích Đông Sơn được phát hiện người Áo, đã đề nghị gọi thời kỳ đó là do một người nông dân đi câu cá đã tìm “Văn hóa Đông Sơn”.(*) thấy một số đồ đồng xuất lộ ra ở bờ Từ năm 1935 đến 1939, hàng loạt sông Mã sau những cơn mưa lớn.
    [Show full text]
  • Phung Nguyen
    Phung Nguyen Received 1S May 1978 NGUYEN BA KHOACH A BRIEF HISTORY OF ARCHAEOLOGY IN VIETNAM RCHAEOLOGY is a relatively young field in Vietnam. Founded in the beginning of A this century by French researchers, the field of archaeology in Vietnam can be divided into three periods: the French period, the independent period which could be divided according to regions of North and South Vietnam, and the present time. Under the French, most of the archaeological works were initiated and directed by the Ecole Fran~aise d'Extreme Orient. The School was established in 1898 by M. Doumer, the Governor General of Indochina at that time. The objectives of the School, as seen in the second article of its bylaws, are: 1. To work on the problems of archaeology and linguistics in the peninsula ofIndo­ china, to promote by all means the knowledge of the area's history, monuments, and dialects. 2. To study also neighboring regions and civilizations like India, China, Malaysia. (BEFEO 1921:2) At the time of its establishment in Vietnam, the field of archaeology in general was very young and its scope was rather ill-defined. To the School, archaeology, as expressed by Bezacier, "is the science of things ancient, and more precisely the knowledge of the exter­ nal forms of the ancient civilizations" (Bezacier 1958:516). When applied to the Far East and particularly Vietnam, the notions of "things ancient" became very arbitrary. Bezacier Author's address: Department of Anthropology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822. Asian XXIII (1), limits the archaeology of Vietnam to a period of about 20 centuries as "manifested in Dong Son Culture to the recent monument" (Bezacier 1958:517).
    [Show full text]
  • Dong Son Culture in Vietnam
    DONG SON CULTURE IN VIETNAM Nguyen Quoc Binh Vietnam National Museum of History Dong Son culture is named as per Dong Son archaeological site found in 1924 in Dong Son commune, the Ma river, Thanh Hoa province, Vietnam. The first Dong Son excavations were carried out from 1924 to 1932 by Mr.L.Pajot- a tarrif staff, ancient objects collector in Thanh Hoa province. In the report of the year 1929, Mr. V.Goloubew- a French scholar in the French School of the Far East expressed his view about the first Dong Son excavations that: "The late bronze age in the Northern Vietnam and North- central Vietnam". By this view, he wished to allude to the ancient archaeological culture, found lately. The term "Dong Son culture" was first put forward by Mr.R. Heine Geldern - the Austria archaeologist in 1934. By archaeological excavations in Vietnam from 1954 to the present we can clearly define that Dong Son culture is the first period of the primary iron age, existed about a millennium, from VIII century B.C to I century A.d. However, in some places of this cultural area, the period could last to II- III A.d. The birth of Dong Son culture is the result of brilliant convergence of many previous cultures before Dong Son culture belonging to the late bronze age thoughout their domain in big rivers, the Vietnam Northern deltas , mainly in the Red river. Distributed sphere of Dong Son culture basically is in the North of Vietnam. The birth of iron technique in that period helped to accomplish bronze metallurgy technique and enhance successfully Dong Son bronze objects.
    [Show full text]
  • The Viêt Peoples and the Origins Of
    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 101 March, 2000 Scripts, Signs, and Swords: the Việt Peoples and the Origins of Nôm by C. Michele Thompson Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series edited by Victor H. Mair. The purpose of the series is to make available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor actively encourages younger, not yet well established, scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including Romanized Modern Standard Mandarin (MSM) and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino-Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. The only style-sheet we honor is that of consistency. Where possible, we prefer the usages of the Journal of Asian Studies. Sinographs (hanzi, also called tetragraphs [fangkuaizi]) and other unusual symbols should be kept to an absolute minimum.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnocultural History of Southeast Asia As Based on the Materials of the 14Th Pacific Sciences Congress (Khabarovsk, August 1979)
    Ethnocultural History of Southeast Asia as Based on the Materials of the 14th Pacific Sciences Congress (Khabarovsk, August 1979) Received 28 November 1980 Y. V. CHESNOV .. T THE 14th Pacific Sciences Congress, a special Section III was arran.g ed to deal A with the problems of ethnocultural history. Within this section there were a few . symposia. The second ("Ecological Problems of Traditional Societies of the Pa­ cific"), the third ("Ancient Cultural Ties and Migrations in the History of Maritime Countries of Southeast Asia and of the Islands of Oceania"), and the fourth ("Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene Cultural Ties of America and Asia") symposia fall into the range of my scientific interests to a much greater extent than the others. To make the discussion fruitful and because my competence is limited, I shall try to concentrate in the present review on the most significant points covering Southeast Asia. As for the rest, I shall note only that the papers presented at the Congress devoted much of their attention to the recent studies and investigations in Oceania, Soviet Primorye [Far East], and Northwest America. An active part in the work of the Congress was played by Vietnamese scholars, who delivered a number of papers at the sessions and submitted to the Congress some more papers which were not, unfortunately, on the agenda as the symposia were too heavily overloaded. It seems expedient therefore to take them up in this review, for in this way we shall be nearer to a more complete view of the present state of affairs in the branches of knowledge we are interested in.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoabinhian and Austronesia: the Root of Diversity in the Western Part of Indonesia
    European Scientific Journal November 2016 edition vol.12, No.32 ISSN: 1857 – 7881 (Print) e - ISSN 1857- 7431 Hoabinhian and Austronesia: The Root of Diversity in the Western Part of Indonesia Dr. Ketut Wiradnyana., M.Si Archaeological Research Office of Northern Sumatera, Indonesia doi: 10.19044/esj.2016.v12n32p131 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n32p131 Abstract The western part of Indonesia mentioned in this paper includes the provinces of North Sumatera and Aceh, in the northern part of Sumatera. The two provinces are rich in archaeological remains, particularly those from Early Holocene up to the megalithic culture. Human activities during the Early Holocene were characterized by the presence of Kitchen Midden sites and Austromelanesoids with Hoabinh culture. This culture is commonly found along the east coast of the two provinces, and some of them are on highlands. The Neolithic culture, which contributes highly significant Austronesian data, are found at the sites on highland area, while other cultures from later period contribute the Megalithic culture that continues until now and becomes the living tradition. The entire depiction is the achievement from a series of archaeological researches, which in turn describes the mixing process among humans and their cultures. The result is a diversity of Indonesian people, particularly in the western part of Indonesia. Keywords: Diversity, hoabinhian, austronesia Introduction Diversity among Indonesian people has occurred since the prehistoric period. The presence of ethnic groups in every cultural area was the result of admixture processes, which was accompanied with cultural intermingling. It was also the case in the western part of Indonesia, which is now the home of various ethnic groups.
    [Show full text]