A Water Budget and Solute Flux Budget for Waimea River Watershed, Kauai, HI, U.S.A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Water Budget and Solute Flux Budget for Waimea River Watershed, Kauai, HI, U.S.A Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2020-12-21 A Water Budget and Solute Flux Budget for Waimea River Watershed, Kauai, HI, U.S.A. Joseph Harold Tolworthy Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Tolworthy, Joseph Harold, "A Water Budget and Solute Flux Budget for Waimea River Watershed, Kauai, HI, U.S.A." (2020). Theses and Dissertations. 8779. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8779 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. A Water Budget and Solute Flux Budget for Waimea River Watershed, Kauai, HI, U.S.A. Joseph Harold Tolworthy A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Stephen Tracy Nelson, Chair Barry R. Bickmore Gregory Carling Department of Geological Sciences Brigham Young University Copyright ©2020 Joseph Harold Tolworthy All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT A Water Budget and Solute Flux Budget for Waimea River Watershed, Kauai, HI, U.S.A. Joseph Harold Tolworthy Department of Geological Sciences, BYU Master of Science Waimea Canyon is a deep V-shaped canyon on the island of Kauai, Hawaii in which the Waimea River and its tributaries flow. The shape and size of the canyon are noteworthy and unusual compared to its contemporary canyons on the Hawaiian Islands which are usually U-shaped or flat bottomed. This could be because there is significantly more physical erosion in Waimea Canyon compared to others. A water budget was created using ArcGIS Pro and data from the University of Hawaii’s rainfall and evapotranspiration atlases, as well as from the United States Geological Survey’s stream gage data. A mass flux was estimated using ArcGIS pro by creating a paleosurface from the ridge points and then finding the mass difference between todays watershed and the watershed with the paleosurface. Weathering reactions were made to model the processes in the watershed. The reactants were found from using oxide percentages of Kauai basalts and inputting them into MELTs to estimate mineralogy. The products were found by analysis of soil and water samples in the area of the Canyon. In the Waimea River watershed approximately 159 t/km2/yr is removed, of which 56% is by physical erosion. This was compared to the V-shaped Makaweli river watershed where approximately 12% is removed by physical erosion and in the U-shaped Hanalei watershed ≈ 68% is removed. While these differences could be explained by vegetation cover, precipitation, and slope steepness it shows that there is not more physical erosion in Waimea Canyon compared to the others. Thus, the origin of the V-shape of Waimea Canyon remains unexplained. Keywords: erosion rates, weathering reactions, water budgets, Waimea Canyon, Hawaii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this study came from the department of Mathematical and Physical sciences at BYU. I would like to thank my advisor Dr Steve Nelson for all his help and support. I would also like to thank my other committee members, Dr Greg Carling and Dr Barry Bickmore for all their help. Kevin Rey also deserves thanks for his help in the field and lab but especially for the expedition down Waimea Canyon. I would like to thank my fellow grad students for their help and support throughout the last 2 years, the Andersons for helping me come to BYU in the first place, and Virgil and Audrey Peterson for their scholarship that allowed me to concentrate on my studies. Most of all I want to thank my friends and family for all their support, help, and patience throughout the whole experience, especially my wonderful wife, Sara. TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE .............................................................................................................................................. i ABSTRACT .....................................................................................................................................ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................ iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ iv LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF APPENDICES ................................................................................................................ vii 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Description of Study Area .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Geology & Hydrogeology..................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Water Budget ........................................................................................................................ 3 2. METHODS ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Water Budget ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Mass Flux .............................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Weathering Reactions ........................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Solute flux ............................................................................................................................. 8 3. RESULTS ................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Water Budget ........................................................................................................................ 9 3.2 Mass and Solute Flux. ........................................................................................................... 9 4. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Water budgets ..................................................................................................................... 11 4.2 Weathering Reactions ......................................................................................................... 12 4.3 Mass flux and comparisons ................................................................................................. 14 5. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 16 6. REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 18 FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... 22 TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... 29 iv LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. ........................................................................................................................................ 22 Figure 2. ........................................................................................................................................ 23 Figure 3. ........................................................................................................................................ 24 Figure 4. ........................................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 5. ........................................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 6. ........................................................................................................................................ 26 Figure 7. ........................................................................................................................................ 27 Figure 8. ........................................................................................................................................ 28 v LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Water Chemistry for sites along the Waimea river and its tributaries. ............................ 29 Table 2: Water budget results ....................................................................................................... 30 Table 3: Solute flux results. .......................................................................................................... 30 Table 4: Soil mineralogy ............................................................................................................... 31 vi LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: FDC results per year for the three rivers
Recommended publications
  • Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1996
    Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1996. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 49, 71 p. (1997) RECORDS OF THE HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 1996 Part 2: Notes1 This is the second of 2 parts to the Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1996 and contains the notes on Hawaiian species of protists, fungi, plants, and animals includ- ing new state and island records, range extensions, and other information. Larger, more comprehensive treatments and papers describing new taxa are treated in the first part of this Records [Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 48]. Foraminifera of Hawaii: Literature Survey THOMAS A. BURCH & BEATRICE L. BURCH (Research Associates in Zoology, Hawaii Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, HI 96817, USA) The result of a compilation of a checklist of Foraminifera of the Hawaiian Islands is a list of 755 taxa reported in the literature below. The entire list is planned to be published as a Bishop Museum Technical Report. This list also includes other names that have been applied to Hawaiian foraminiferans. Loeblich & Tappan (1994) and Jones (1994) dis- agree about which names should be used; therefore, each is cross referenced to the other. Literature Cited Bagg, R.M., Jr. 1980. Foraminifera collected near the Hawaiian Islands by the Steamer Albatross in 1902. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 34(1603): 113–73. Barker, R.W. 1960. Taxonomic notes on the species figured by H. B. Brady in his report on the Foraminifera dredged by HMS Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 9, 239 p. Belford, D.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Impact Assessment for The
    Cultural Impact Assessment for the Alakai Protective Fence Project Waimea and Wainiha Ahupua‘a, Waimea and Hanalei Districts, Island of Kaua‘i TMK: [4] 5-8-001:001 & [4]-1-4-001:003 Prepared for The Nature Conservancy in Hawai‘i, Kaua‘i Program Prepared by Hallett Hammatt, Ph.D. Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i, Inc. Kailua, Hawai‘i (Job Code: WAINIHA 2) March 2008 O‘ahu Office Maui Office P.O. Box 1114 1993 Main St. Kailua, Hawai‘i 96734 Wailuku, Hawai‘i 96793 www.culturalsurveys.com Ph.: (808) 262-9972 Ph: (808) 242-9882 Fax: (808) 262-4950 Fax: (808) 244-1994 Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i Job Code: WAINIHA 2 Management Summary Management Summary Report Reference Cultural Impact Assessment for the for the Alaka‘i Protective Fence Project, Waimea and Wainiha Ahupua`a, Waimea and Hanalei Districts, Kaua‘i Island Project Number Cultural Surveys Hawai‘i, Inc. (CSH) Job Code: WAHI 6 Location Waimea and Wainiha Ahupua‘a, Waimea and Hanalei Districts, Island of Kaua‘i, TMK: [4] 5-8-001:001 & [4]-1-4-001:003 Date Submitted March 2008 Agencies State Historic Preservation District, Department of Health (DOH), Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQC), The Nature Conservancy Hawai‘i (TNC) Development The Nature Conservancy, along with cooperating landowners of the Project Description KWA, including McBryde Sugar Co., Ltd. (the “McBryde Property”), and Acreage and the State of Hawai`i (the “State Property”) will oversee the construction of a feral pig and feral goat proof fence across the Alaka‘i Plateau from Wainiha Pali south-east to the Summit Bog Fence.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood of August 1950 in the Waimea Area Kauai, Hawaii
    Flood of August 1950 in the Waimea Area Kauai, Hawaii > R. K. CHUN :^LOODS OF 1950 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1137-C ^repared in cooperation with the Territory of Hawaii UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1952 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 15 cents (paper cover) PREFACE This report on the flood of August 1950 in Kauai, T. H., was prepared in the Surface Water Branch, J. V. B. Wells, Chief. The material was assem­ bled and the text was written by R. K. Chun, hydraulic engineer, under the immediate super­ vision of M. H. Carson, District Engineer. Base data used in this report were collected in cooperation with the Territory of Hawaii. The Weather Bureau furnished a discussion on the meteorology of the storm and a map showing the path of the hurricane. The collection of data for indirect determination of peak discharges was supervised, and the computations made, by Hollister Johnson, hydraulic engineer. Ill CONTENTS Page Introduction ..................................................... 327 Stages and discharges at stream-gaging stations ..................... 327 Waimea River near Waimea, Kauai .............................. 331 Kawaikoi Stream near Waimea, Kauai ............................ 332 Mohihi Stream near Waimea/ Kauai .............................. 333 Makaweli River near Waimea, Kauai ............................. 334 Combined discharge of Waimea and Makaweli Rivers ............... 335 Summary of flood data ............................................ 337 Flood stages and discharges ..................................... 337 Annual floods in Waimea River ................................... 337 Physical features of Kauai'........................................ 342 Meteorological features of the flood ................................ 343 Precipitation................................................... 343 Meteorology, by R.
    [Show full text]
  • 25 Using Community Group Monitoring Data to Measure The
    25 Using Community Group Monitoring Data To Measure The Effectiveness Of Restoration Actions For Australia's Woodland Birds Michelle Gibson1, Jessica Walsh1,2, Nicki Taws5, Martine Maron1 1Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, 4072, Queensland, Australia, 2School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, 3800, Victoria, Australia, 3Greening Australia, Aranda, Canberra, 2614 Australian Capital Territory, Australia, 4BirdLife Australia, Carlton, Melbourne, 3053, Victoria, Australia, 5Greening Australia, PO Box 538 Jamison Centre, Macquarie, Australian Capital Territory 2614, Australia Before conservation actions are implemented, they should be evaluated for their effectiveness to ensure the best possible outcomes. However, many conservation actions are not implemented under an experimental framework, making it difficult to measure their effectiveness. Ecological monitoring datasets provide useful opportunities for measuring the effect of conservation actions and a baseline upon which adaptive management can be built. We measure the effect of conservation actions on Australian woodland ecosystems using two community group-led bird monitoring datasets. Australia’s temperate woodlands have been largely cleared for agricultural production and their bird communities are in decline. To reverse these declines, a suite of conservation actions has been implemented by government and non- government agencies, and private landholders. We analysed the response of total woodland bird abundance, species richness, and community condition, to two widely-used actions — grazing exclusion and replanting. We recorded 139 species from 134 sites and 1,389 surveys over a 20-year period. Grazing exclusion and replanting combined had strong positive effects on all three bird community metrics over time relative to control sites, where no actions had occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Erosion at Waimea Bay, Oahu, Hawaiil
    Pacific Science (1982), vol. 36, no. 1 © 1982 by the University of Hawaii Press. All rights reserved Beach Erosion at Waimea Bay, Oahu, Hawaii l J. F. CAMPBELL 2 and D. J. HWANG 2 ABSTRACT: Waimea Beach on the island of Oahu, Hawaii, is a popular recreation area, which is presently endangered by severe erosion. The extent of shoreline erosion has been determined from comparison of an 1884 survey map with aerial photographs from the period 1928-1975, and from measure­ ments of the changes in the vegetation line during that time. The Waimea section of Oahu's shoreline has receded about 200 ft in this 47-yr period. This erosion is caused primarily by storms that move the beach sand into deeper waters from which it cannot return to the beach and the lack of supply of new sand to the beach. Sand mining and abrasion also have contributed to the retreat of the shoreline. Continued periodic measurements and aerial surveys would be valuable in tracking the regression of the shoreline and useful for planning the future of public facilities located in Waimea Bay. PROBLEMS RELATED TO EROSION of a coastline luvium because ofchanges in sea level relative are often first noticed when people see that to the island, was once graded to a depth of man-made structures are in danger of being 215 ft below present sea level (Coulbourn, washed into the sea. In areas where there are Campbell, and Moberly 1974) and possibly no man-made structures along the shore, deeper. coastal erosion problems usually are not Other than the valley, the most prominent recognized.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii River Basins Planning Status Report
    HAWAII RIVER BASINS U А Ш А I I PLANNING STATUS REPORT WATER RESOURCE APPRAISALS FOR HYDROELECTRIC LI CENSING BUREAU OF POWER 1 see WATER RESOURCE APPRAISALS FOR HYDROELECTRIC LI CENSI NG PLANNING STATUS REPORT This is one of a series of Planning Status Reports being pre­ pared for major river basins in the United States. These reports constitute the first step in a program of water resource appraisals for hydroelectric licensing. They are prepared by the Bureau of Power of the Federal Power Commission to identify those basins most in need of additional planning studies to provide information needed by the Commission in its hydroelectric li­ censing and other work. The Planning Status Reports show data on existing water resource developments and known po­ tentials, summarize the license status of non-Federal hydro­ electric developments, review past and current planning studies, and identify the needs for additional planning. The information presented in these reports is abstracted from available sources and its assembly involves no new studies. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION BUREAU OF POWER 1 see HAWAII RIVER BASINS KAUAI NIIHAU OAHU Honolulu MOLOKAI LANAI & KAHOOLAWE DESCRIPTION OF THE BASIN Hawaii is the oceanic state of the United States consisting of a group of islands in the Pacific Ocean, the easternmost end of the chain being about 2,1+00 statute miles from California. The main group, lying south of the Tropic of Cancer, includes from east to west the islands of Hawaii, Maui, Kahoolawe, Lanai, Molokai, Oahu, Kauai, and Niihau. The Hawaiian Islands are part of a mostly submerged volcanic mountain range stretching some 2,000 miles across the floor of the north-central Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Ethnography and Archaeology of Russian Fort Elisabeth State Historical Park, Waimea, Kaua'i
    Historical Ethnography and Archaeology of Russian Fort Elisabeth State Historical Park, Waimea, Kaua'i Peter R Mills Department ofAnthropology, University ofVermont Introduction There is a sign on the highway in Waimea, Kaua'i in the Hawaiian Islands with the words "Russian Fort" printed on it. Local residents use the same term to refer to the State Historical Park that the sign marks. I give this introduction not because it is the best, but because it is the one that everyone else gets. Fort Elisabeth was built in Waimea, Kaua' i following an alliance between Kaumuali'i, paramount chief of Kaua'i, and Georg Anton Schiffer of the Russian-American Company (RAC) in 1816. Georg Schaffer and the RAC were forced to leave Kaua'i in 1817 which left Kaumuali'i in sole control of the fort. Most tourists visiting the site are surprised to fmd that Russians were building forts in the Hawaiian Islands, but the story of Fort Elisabeth and two smaller forts (Alexander and Barclay) on the north shore of Kaua'i (Figure 1) has been "well-tilled" (Barratt 1988:v) for over a century (Alexander 1894; Barratt 1988:15-24; Bolkhovitinov 1973; Bradley 1942; Emerson 1900; Golder 1930; Gronski 1928; Jarves 1844:201-203; Mazour 1937; Mehnert 1939: 22-65; Okun 1951; Pierce 1965; Tumarkin 1964:134-166; Whitney 1838:48-51). On Kaua'i, Fort Elisabeth seems to be perceived as a cumbersome and obscure monument to 19th century European expansion, lacking in any connection to traditional Hawaiian landscapes. Within the academic community, little recent attention focuses on the fort other than Richard Pierce's Russia's Hawaiian Adventure 1815-1817 (1965) with a follow-up article by Bolkhovitinov (1973).
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Forts on Kauai, Hawaiian Islands: a Brief Synthesis
    19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450 ■ 707.847.3437 ■ [email protected] ■ www.fortross.org Title: The Russian Forts on Kauai, Hawaiian Islands: a Brief Synthesis Author (s): William K. Kikuchi and Delores L. Kikuchi Source: Fort Ross Conservancy Library URL: http://www.fortross.org/lib.html Unless otherwise noted in the manuscript, each author maintains copyright of his or her written material. Fort Ross Conservancy (FRC) asks that you acknowledge FRC as the distributor of the content; if you use material from FRC’s online library, we request that you link directly to the URL provided. If you use the content offline, we ask that you credit the source as follows: “Digital content courtesy of Fort Ross Conservancy, www.fortross.org; author maintains copyright of his or her written material.” Also please consider becoming a member of Fort Ross Conservancy to ensure our work of promoting and protecting Fort Ross continues: http://www.fortross.org/join.htm. This online repository, funded by Renova Fort Ross Foundation, is brought to you by Fort Ross Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) and California State Park cooperating association. FRC’s mission is to connect people to the history and beauty of Fort Ross and Salt Point State Parks. 1. · THE RUSSIAN FORTS ON YJ~UAI, HAWAIIAN ISLfu.~DS: A BRIEF SYNTHESIS by William K. Kikuchi and Delores L. Kikuchi PREFACE This report was written in partial fulfillment of Contract Number 11755 between the author and the State of Hawaii, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of State Parks. The contract originally called for the archaeological survey of .
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Hawaii 1909-1911
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DlRECTOB WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 318 WATER RESOURCES OF HAWAII 1909-1911 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF M. 0. LEIGHTON BY W. F. MARTIN AND C. H. PIERCE o = i ';, -; CQ> 3 -cc -7; tr, -; pu * J ?; '' ^ yK- *^^ r «; *--i fe ^ fJS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1913 CONTENTS. Page. Authority for investigations................................................. 11 Cooperation and acknowledgments......................................... 12 Purpose and scope of invstigations........................................... 15 Field methods for measuring stream flow.................................... 16 Base data.............................................................. 16 Weir measurements................................................... 17 Velocity-area method ................................................. 19 Definition of terms......................................................... 23 Convenient equivalents.................................................... 25 Office methods of computing and studying discharge and run-off.............. 26 Explanation of tables....................................................... 29 Accuracy and reliability of field data and comparative results................ 31 Gaging stations maintained in Hawaii...................................... 32 Island of Kauai............................................................ 36 General features....................................................... 36 Waimea River basin...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Consul on Kauai
    WSTili V t ri '" . 4 i Mil. !, , r. jf Gardbn, Island ' . represents j .Kauai. ri TERRITORY MARCH SUBSCRIPTION RATES, it , ESTABLISHED 1904. VOL. 9. NO. 11, LIHUE, OF HAWAII. TUESDAY. 18, 1913. CENTS PER COPY PRETTY GIRLS MARRED MEN IllE TO HAVE MOST MODERN LAND LAW QUESTION GIVE CONGER T W PENNANT The possible naming of Link McAndless as governor of t h e STORE BUILDING IN THE TER Territory indicates about the first sign of relief for the futtirp home to any are who are Waimea is have a concert. If there under steaders, since it is a well citi- impression baseball known And like everything else the the that the tact that he is probablv o f spirit wane in the best zens that enterprising little is on the the posted man on land affairs in burg decide to do, is to be by vicinity of Eleele, they should have the it Territory, and will tlnis be in a far the greatest ever held in Wai- been a witness to the game be- RITORY OUTSIDE position to understand A chorus of pretty girls tween the married single men the situation mea. have and from homesteaders' point o f been faithfully practicing e v o n field last Sun- the e.r the Alexander 11 view. Another important fact is off, young since last September, with a view day. At the start the that he will be entirely free Irnm ultimately furnishing men Capt. Leavitt's to the town located that influence which has made the first-clas- s out up and down with some music, and metioric and in, present uovernor little less th.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission Seattlenwf
    A CATALOGUE OF THE SHORE FISHES COLLECTED BY THE STEAMER ALBATROSS ABOUT THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS IN 1902. By JOHN OTTERBEIN SNYDER, Assistant Professor 0./ Zoology in Leland StanfordJunior Unil1ersity. This paper contains a list of the species of fishes obtained by the United States Fish Commission steamer Alba,f'ro88, Chauncey Thomas, commander, in the shore and reef work about the Hawaiian Islands during the spring and summer of IHO~, under the general direction of Dr. David Starr Jordan and Dr. Barton Warren Evermann, In addition to the fishes collected from the tide pools and from the shallow water neal' shore, a few are included which were taken from depths of 75 fathoms or more, while some have come from near the surface far out at sea. Several species occurring in the rivers and ponds are also noted. Many of the rarer forms, which arc only occasionally caught by the fishermen, were secured through the kindly Interest of Mr. E. Louis Berndt, inspector of fisheries in Honolulu. The writer takes pleasure in expressing his obligations to Dr. Charles H. Gilbert, who had immediate supervision of the zoological work of the AI1Jatro.~8, and also to Dr. Jordan, for much help and for many valuable suggestions in the preparation of this paper. Dr.•Jordan's advice has been followed in all matters of nomenclature. The following genera and species, believed to be new to science, are described: Veternio, new genus of Leptocephalida-, Gymnothorax berndti. Apogon erythrinns, Collybus, new genus of Bramidee, Gymuothorax mucifer. Cirrhilabrus [ordani, Careharias insularum, Gymnothorax xanthostomus. Pseudojulis cerasina.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of Hawaii 1912
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 336 WATER RESOURCES OF HAWAII 1912 BY C. H. PIERCE AND G. K. LARRISON WASHINGTON GOVEBNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1914 CONTENTS. Page. Authority for investigations................................................. 9 Cooperation................................................................ 10 Scope of work............................................................. ^ 10 Field methods of measuring stream flow..................................... 11 Base data.............................................................. 11 Weir measurements................................................... 11 Velocity-area method................................................... 12 Definition of terms......................................................... 16 Convenient equivalents.................................................... 18 Office methods of computing and studying discharge and run-off.............. 19 Explanation of tables....................................................... 22 Accuracy and reliability of field data and comparative results................. 24 Division of work.......................................................... 24 Gaging stations maintained in Hawaii...................................... 25 .Geography of the Hawaiian Islands. .\...................................... 29 Station records............................................................ 34 Island of Kauai.......................................................
    [Show full text]