Investigating Plant Phenotype, Salinity, and Infestation by the Roseau

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigating Plant Phenotype, Salinity, and Infestation by the Roseau Wetlands (2020) 40:1327–1337 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-020-01307-3 GENERAL WETLAND SCIENCE Investigating Plant Phenotype, Salinity, and Infestation by the Roseau Cane Scale as Factors in the Die-Back of Phragmites australis in the Mississippi River Delta, USA Ian A. Knight1 & James T. Cronin2 & Madeline Gill1 & John A. Nyman3 & Blake E. Wilson1 & Rodrigo Diaz1 Received: 23 July 2019 /Accepted: 6 May 2020 / Published online: 17 July 2020 # Society of Wetland Scientists 2020 Abstract Die-back of Phragmites australis in the Mississippi River Delta (MRD), Louisiana, USA, is associated with large populations of nonnative Roseau Cane Scale (RCS), Nipponaclerda biwakoensis. Initial observations suggested different P. australis pheno- types displayed different susceptibilities to scale infestation and die-back, but the role of scale infestation on die-back was unknown. To understand the effect of RCS on P. australis, paired stands of Delta and European phenotypes in the MRD were monitored for stem heights, densities, and scale infestation over two years. A mesocosm experiment was conducted to assess whether RCS abundance and P. australis growth were dependent on water salinity and phenotype. Three Phragmites australis phenotypes were grown in small pools under fresh or mesohaline conditions, and RCS infestated or non-infested treatments. Scale densities were up to 7 times greater on the Delta compared to the European phenotype. Scale infestation resulted in 22%– 39% reductions in the proportion of stems with green leaf tissue for all phenotypes, and 12% reduction in stem heights for Delta- type. Salinity was detrimental to all phenotypes, reducing stem heights by 20% compared to freshwater. Our results provide evidence that the RCS can result in die-back symptoms similar to what is observed in the MRD. Keywords Die-back . Phragmites australis . Mississippi River Delta . Scale insect . Salinity . Phenotype Introduction of NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) from Landsat imagery has suggested that declines may have begun Die-back of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Tren. Ex Steud. was as early as 2015 (Ramsey III and Rangoonwala 2017). While detected in the Fall of 2016 affecting stands across the P. australis is often considered invasive across much of North Mississippi River Delta (MRD), Plaquemines Parish, America (Chambers et al. 1999), it can also provide several Louisiana, USA (Knight et al. 2018). Symptoms of die-back ecosystems services (reviewed in Kiviat 2013). Pragmites include retreat from deep water, reductions in stem density, a australis is the dominant emergent vegetation in the more clumped distribution of stems within a stand, and pre- Mississippi River Delta (Hauber et al. 2011), and declining mature senescence of leaf tissue (Armstrong et al. 1996a;van stands of P. australis raise concerns over the stability of the der Putten 1997). Widespread declines in plant health have regional wetlands. also been observed through remote sensing where an analysis Although die-back of P. australis is new to the MRD, the phenomenon has been reported from across its cosmopolitan distribution. Research by the European Research Project on * Ian A. Knight Reed Die-back and Progression concluded that a significant [email protected] factor in the decades of die-back in Europe was eutrophica- tion, exacerbated by stagnant water tables (reviewed in van 1 Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University, 402 der Putten 1997). This was by no means the only factor iden- Biological Sciences Bldg, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA tified in the die-back across this continent. Stress from soil 2 Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, phytotoxins, plant pathogens, and insect feeding damage were Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA all implicated in producing symptoms associated with die- 3 School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University, back (Armstrong et al. 1996a, b). In China, die-back of stands Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA in the Dongtan wetlands of the Yangtze River estuary were 1328 Wetlands (2020) 40:1327–1337 attributed to the invasion of Spartina alterniflora (Loisel.). Mediterranean, and is the dominant lineage found in the The only North American account of P. australis die-back MRD (Hauber et al. 2011;Lambertinietal.2012). Die- occurred at Pointe Mouillee, Michigan, concurrent with cata- backs in the MRD appear to primarily, or at least more severe- strophic die-back of other emergent wetland species, and was ly impact the Delta-type (Knight et al. 2018). Also found attributed to rising and prolonged high water levels within the MRD is a phenotype of European lineage (EU- (McDonald 1955). type, haplotype M) (Saltonstall 2002; Lambertini et al. Increasing salinity can also cause die-back of P. australis 2012). The EU-type P. australis is a lineage that is often stands. Lissner and Schierup (1997) report die-back of considered invasive throughout much of North America and P. australis stands in Europe at sites where soil water salinity is frequently reported to be less susceptible to arthropod her- was greater than 15% [sic]. Concentrations of 20 ppt and bivores than native North American haplotypes (Park and greater have been shown to reduce shoot production (Eller Blossey 2008;Croninetal.2015). Beyond the MRD, Land- et al. 2014; Achenbach and Brix 2014), though no differences type (haplotype I) is found in more upland habitat, is widely were observed below 20 ppt. Soil water salinities of 28 ppt distributed along the Gulf Coast (Saltonstall 2002; Hauber promoted replacement of invasive P. australis by native salt et al. 2011), and has recently spread westward to California marsh species (Sun et al. 2007). Symptoms such as stunted (Meyerson et al. 2010). Considered to be a distinct subspecies plant growth are exacerbated by greater salinities and (P. australis berlandieri), Land-type occurs in less saline con- prolonged exposure (Hellings and Gallagher 1992; Howard ditions, potentially explaining its rarity in the MRD and Rafferty 2006). Saltwater intrusion resulting from eustatic (Achenbach and Brix 2014). sea level rise, subsidence, and changes in weather patterns as a The goal of this study is to investigate the role of RCS in result of global climate change are expected to exacerbate the die-back of P. australis by determining the susceptibility salinity stress (reviewed in Day Jr et al. 2005). of different P. australis phenotypes to the scale, and testing The discovery of extensive die-back in the MRD precipi- how scale herbivory and salt stress interact to affect plant tated the discovery of heavy infestations of the non-native health. The first objective was to evaluate stand conditions Roseau Cane Scale (hereafter referred to as RCS), and determine whether the two common P. australis pheno- Nipponaclerda biwakoensis (Kuwana) types found in the MRD (EU-type, Delta-type) differ in RCS (Hemiptera:Aclerdidae) (Knight et al. 2018). Subsequent sam- abundance (number of scales per stem) and frequency of par- pling by our group revealed that the RCS was present in 11 asitism. Five contiguous pairs of EU- and Delta-type stands parishes in southeastern Louisiana (Knight et al. 2018). The were censused over two years. For the second objective, a scale appears to have arrived with three Encyrtid parasitoid controlled mesocosm experiment was conducted to test wasps known from their native range, Astymachus japonicus whether salinity level and P. australis phenotype influenced Howard, Neastymachus japonicus Tachikawa, and susceptibility to the RCS and whether the RCS alone or in Boucekiella depressa Hoffer (Tachikawa 1970; Kaneko combination with salinity could cause the die-back symptoms 2004; Knight et al. 2018). Native to Japan, China, and observed in the MRD. Korea, RCS is of little to no concern to local P. australis populations except as a pest where P. australis is grown com- mercially (Kuwana 1907; Qin et al. 2003;Brixetal.2014). Materials and Methods The effect of the RCS on P. australis health has not been studied; however, feeding by sap sucking insects can result in Paired Stands of EU- and Delta-Type Phenotypes physiological changes, which may reduce airflow to sub- merged roots (Armstrong et al. 1996b). Other damage by Pass-a-Loutre Wildlife Management Area (Pass-a-Loutre) is a sap-sucking insects includes injury by direct removal of plant 46,540 ha reserve located in the Mississippi River Delta and nutrients and sugars, as well as reduced photosynthesis from managed by the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and the accumulation of sooty mold growing on excreted honey- Fisheries. Pass-a-Loutre is a coastal freshwater marsh with dew (Bowling et al. 2016). Severe infestations of invasive sap- average salinity levels less than 1 ppt that is fringed by beach sucking, scale-like, insects in bamboo can result in death of and barrier island habitats with P. australis being the domi- the stand (Hodges and Hodges 2004). Currently, there are no nant vegetation of the region (CPRA 2019). Mean water depth data on the role of RCS infestations in P. australis die-back, across sites at the time of sampling ranged from 7 to 44 cm. but initial observations of relatively low scale densities and Mean annual air temperatures over the duration of the study better apparent health of certain P. australis phenotypes in the ranged from 17.2 to 25 °C and sites consisted of Balize and MRD implicate RCS as a potential factor in the die-backs. Larose soils (Natural Resources Conservation Service 2019). Within Louisiana there are several genetic lineages with Across its invasive range, exotic Haplotype M exhibits distinctive phenotypes. Delta-type (haplotype M1) is geneti- growth habits that distinguish it from native haplotypes. cally similar to populations found in North Africa and the Relative stem heights are comparable among haplotypes for Wetlands (2020) 40:1327–1337 1329 young shoots (Vasquez et al. 2005), but non-native index of degree of plant senescence. Percent green was esti- P.
Recommended publications
  • Recerca I Territori V12 B (002)(1).Pdf
    Butterfly and moths in l’Empordà and their response to global change Recerca i territori Volume 12 NUMBER 12 / SEPTEMBER 2020 Edition Graphic design Càtedra d’Ecosistemes Litorals Mediterranis Mostra Comunicació Parc Natural del Montgrí, les Illes Medes i el Baix Ter Museu de la Mediterrània Printing Gràfiques Agustí Coordinadors of the volume Constantí Stefanescu, Tristan Lafranchis ISSN: 2013-5939 Dipòsit legal: GI 896-2020 “Recerca i Territori” Collection Coordinator Printed on recycled paper Cyclus print Xavier Quintana With the support of: Summary Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Xavier Quintana Butterflies of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ................................................................................................................. 11 Tristan Lafranchis Moths of the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ............................................................................................................................31 Tristan Lafranchis The dispersion of Lepidoptera in the Montgrí-Baix Ter region ...........................................................51 Tristan Lafranchis Three decades of butterfly monitoring at El Cortalet ...................................................................................69 (Aiguamolls de l’Empordà Natural Park) Constantí Stefanescu Effects of abandonment and restoration in Mediterranean meadows .......................................87
    [Show full text]
  • When Misconceptions Impede Best Practices: Evidence Supports Biological Control of Invasive Phragmites
    Biol Invasions https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-02166-8 (0123456789().,-volV)( 0123456789().,-volV) PERSPECTIVES AND PARADIGMS When misconceptions impede best practices: evidence supports biological control of invasive Phragmites Bernd Blossey . Stacy B. Endriss . Richard Casagrande . Patrick Ha¨fliger . Hariet Hinz . Andrea Da´valos . Carrie Brown-Lima . Lisa Tewksbury . Robert S. Bourchier Received: 9 July 2019 / Accepted: 26 November 2019 Ó The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Development of a biological control pro- the risks invasive Phragmites represent to North gram for invasive Phagmites australis australis in American habitats. But to protect those habitats and North America required 20 years of careful research, the species, including P. australis americanus,we and consideration of management alternatives. A come to a different decision regarding biological recent paper by Kiviat et al. (Biol Invasions control. Current management techniques have not 21:2529–2541, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530- been able to reverse the invasiveness of P. australis 019-02014-9) articulates opposition to this biocontrol australis, threats to native rare and endangered species program and questions the ethics and thoroughness of continue, and large-scale herbicide campaigns are not the researchers. Here we address inaccuracies and only costly, but also represent threats to non-target misleading statements presented in Kiviat et al. species. We see implementation of biocontrol as the (2019), followed by a brief overview of why biological best hope for managing one of the most problematic control targeting Phragmites in North America can be invasive plants in North America. After extensive implemented safely with little risk to native species.
    [Show full text]
  • Phragmites Australis
    Journal of Ecology 2017, 105, 1123–1162 doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12797 BIOLOGICAL FLORA OF THE BRITISH ISLES* No. 283 List Vasc. PI. Br. Isles (1992) no. 153, 64,1 Biological Flora of the British Isles: Phragmites australis Jasmin G. Packer†,1,2,3, Laura A. Meyerson4, Hana Skalov a5, Petr Pysek 5,6,7 and Christoph Kueffer3,7 1Environment Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 2School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; 3Institute of Integrative Biology, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, CH-8092, Zurich,€ Switzerland; 4University of Rhode Island, Natural Resources Science, Kingston, RI 02881, USA; 5Institute of Botany, Department of Invasion Ecology, The Czech Academy of Sciences, CZ-25243, Pruhonice, Czech Republic; 6Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, CZ-12844, Prague 2, Czech Republic; and 7Centre for Invasion Biology, Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Matieland 7602, South Africa Summary 1. This account presents comprehensive information on the biology of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. (P. communis Trin.; common reed) that is relevant to understanding its ecological char- acteristics and behaviour. The main topics are presented within the standard framework of the Biologi- cal Flora of the British Isles: distribution, habitat, communities, responses to biotic factors and to the abiotic environment, plant structure and physiology, phenology, floral and seed characters, herbivores and diseases, as well as history including invasive spread in other regions, and conservation. 2. Phragmites australis is a cosmopolitan species native to the British flora and widespread in lowland habitats throughout, from the Shetland archipelago to southern England.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOBLITZ 2020 Lille Vildmosecentret Mellemområdet
    LILLE VILDMOSE BIOBLITZ 2020 Lille Vildmosecentret Mellemområdet Arrangeret af Lille Vildmosecentret og Vildmoseforeningen Støttet af Lille Vildmose Naturfond Bioblitz i Lille Vildmose 2020 Skrevet af Mia Yung Heine Petersen, naturformidler - Lille Vildmosecentret For anden gang blev der afholdt bioblitz i Lille Vildmose. Sidste gang var i august 2017, hvor Mellemområdet i Lille Vildmose blev afsøgt for dyr og planter. I år blev bioblitzen afholdt i weekenden 29. - 30. august, hvor omkring 30 eksperter og naturnørder fra hele landet igen skulle finde så mange dyr- og plantearter som igtmul indenfor 24 timer. Startskudet lød kl. 10.00 lørdag d. 29. august, hvor vejret forinden ikke så ud til at være med os, men da startskudet lød var der heldigvis tørvejr. Ud forsvandt alle eksperter og naturnørder. Ud for at registrere myrer, svampe, biller, fugle, sommerfugle og andet liv i Lille Vildmose. Bioblitzen var afgrænset til at foregå i Mellemområdet, som er indhegnet af et 30 km. langt hegn og er 2100 ha. stort, samt på Lille Vildmosecentrets område som er 17 ha. stort. Alle deltagerer havde frivilligt afsat en weekend for at være med til at se om artstallet fra 2017 kunne overgås. Nogle af deltagerne deltog også i 2017, men i år havde vi også nye ansigter med. Grundet et 2020 hvor Covid-19 har præget næsten hele år 2020, så var der tvivl om den planlagte bioblitz kunne afholdes. Heldigvis kunne den gennemføres og Lille Vildmosecentrets nye store og flotte Naturskole-lokale blev taget i brug, således Covid-19 retningslinierne kunne overholdes. Ligesom i 2017 var der mu- lighed for at Lille Vildmosecentrets besøgende kunne blive klogere på en bioblitz samt børnefamilierne kunne komme på en mini-bioblitz.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Invasions: Biogeography and Multitrophic Interactions
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2016 Biological Invasions: Biogeography and Multitrophic Interactions Warwick Allen Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Allen, Warwick, "Biological Invasions: Biogeography and Multitrophic Interactions" (2016). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2723. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2723 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS: BIOGEOGRAPHY AND MULTITROPHIC INTERACTIONS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of Biological Sciences by Warwick James Allen B.Sc. (Hons.), Lincoln University, New Zealand, 2009 December 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people have been invaluable to my professional and personal development during my time at Louisiana State University (LSU), but none more so than my advisor, Jim Cronin. He is a fountain of knowledge and generously gave his time, expertise, and support to all my endeavors. I will always be appreciative of the countless opportunities and experiences I have had as a result of Jim’s support and guidance - he has been a wonderful mentor and never failed to get the best out of me. Many thanks to my various committee members - Kyle Harms, Michael Stout, James Geaghan, John White, Erik Aschehoug, and Lawrence Rouse.
    [Show full text]
  • Target Invasive Plants and Biocontrol Agents Undergoing Screening
    Target Invasive Plants and Biocontrol Agents Undergoing Screening The B.C. Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development (MFLNRORD), through contributed funding, enables research by Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International (CABI) and Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC)’s Weed Biological Control program into potential new biocontrol agents for the province on an annual basis. Research on these agents is additionally funded by a consortium of interested partners, including other Canadian provincial and federal government departments, U.S.A. county, state and federal agencies, U.S.A. and Canadian Universities, and NGOs. Specific funding and research partners vary with each plant targeted. The invasive plants currently targeted by British Columbia, as of March 2020, and their consortia objectives, are: • Common reed (Phragmites australis) • Common tansy (Tanacetum vulgare) • Dalmatian and yellow toadflax (Linaria dalmatica and L. vulgaris) • Flowering rush (Butomus umbellatus) • Hawkweed complex (Pilosella spp., syn. Hieracium spp.) • Himalayan balsam aka: Policeman's helmet (Impatiens glandulifera) • Hoary cresses (Lepidium draba, L. chalepense and L. appelianum) • Knotweed (Fallopia/Polygonum spp.) • Oxeye daisy (Leucanthemum vulgare) • Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) Common reed (Phragmites australis) No biological control agents exist in B.C. to date for this perennial wetland grass. Investigation into potential biological control for invasive common reed in North America began in 1998. Participation in the project mainly involved agencies from the U.S.A. and eastern Canada and in 2013, B.C. joined the project to assist with completion of work on the two candidate biological control agents as the province has several populations of this invasive plant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation
    >ss> HARVARD UNIVERSITY Library of the Museum of Comparative Zoology MCZ LIBRARY MAR 2 9 1990 ' JARVARD IVERSITY Entomologist's Record AND JOURNAL OF VARIATION EDITED BY P. A. SOKOLOFF, f.r.e.s. Vol. 101 1989 Ill CONTENTS Aberration of Gymnoscelis rufifasciata Bivoltinism in Eupithecia tripunctaria H.- (Haworth) (Lep.: Geometridae) — the S. (Lep.: Geometridae) in south-east Double-striped pug. C. W. Plant, 105. England. B.K. West, 57 Abraxas grossulariata L. (Lep.: Geo- Book talk W.J.M. Chalmers-Hunt, 275 metridae), has it been shifting its Hfe Brachypalpus laphriformis (Fallen) (Dipt.: cyclQl A. A. Allen, 13% Syrphidae) A^.L. Birkett, 59 Acleris abietana (Hiibn) (Lep.: Tortrici- Breeding Gnorimus nobilis Linn. (Col.: dae) in Aberdeenshire. M.C. Townsend, Scarabidae) in captivity. J. A. Owen. 19 208 Brimstone moth {Opisthograptis luteolata Acleris abietana (Hiibn. (Lep.: Tortrici- L.). (Lep.: Geometridae) B.K. West, 167 dae) - records and foodplants, M.R. Browne versus Watson: Round two. R.R. Young. 37 Uhthoff-Kaufmann, 61. Agonopterix carduella Hiibner (Lep.: Bryaxis puncticollis Denny (Col.: Psela- Oecophoridae) in October. J.M. Chal- phidae) apparently new to Kent. A. A. mers-Hunt, 39 Allen, 11 Agriopis marginaria Fab. (Lep.: Geometri- Butterflies in winter. A. Archer-Lock, 117 dae), the Dotted-border moth caught in Butterflies of New Providence Island, December, A.M. Riley. 35 Bahamas, A further review. B.K. West, Agrotis ipsilon Hufn. (Lep.: Noctuidae) 109 Butterfly in March. J. Owen, 187 records from Dorset, 1988. A.M. and D.K. Riley, 33 An apparently new species of Homoneura (Dipt.: Lauxaniidae) from north-west Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Hiibn.) (Lep.: Kent.
    [Show full text]
  • Hampshire & Isle of Wight Butterfly & Moth Report 2013
    Butterfly Conservation HAMPSHIRE & ISLE OF WIGHT BUTTERFLY & MOTH REPORT 2013 Contents Page Introduction – Mike Wall 2 The butterfly and moth year 2013 – Tim Norriss 3 Branch reserves updates Bentley Station Meadow – Jayne Chapman 5 Magdalen Hill Down – Jenny Mallett 8 Yew Hill – Brian Fletcher 9 Dukes on the Edge – Dan Hoare 11 Reflections on Mothing – Barry Goater 13 Brown Hairstreak – Henry Edmunds 18 Obituary: Tony Dobson – Mike Wall 19 Hampshire & Isle of Wight Moth Weekend 2013 – Mike Wall 21 Common Species Summary 24 Branch photographic competition 26 Alternative Mothing – Tim Norriss 28 Great Butterfly Race 2013 – Lynn Fomison 29 Weather report 2013 – Dave Owen 30 Glossary of terms 32 Butterfly report 2013 33 Butterfly record coverage 2013 33 Summary of earliest-latest butterfly sightings 2013 34 2012-2013 butterfly trends in Hampshire & Isle of Wight 35 Species accounts 36 Moth report 2013 72 Editorial 72 Moth record coverage 2013 73 Species accounts 74 List of observers 146 Index to Butterfly Species Accounts 152 1 Introduction I have pleasure in writing this, my first introduction as Chairman of the Branch. When I joined Butterfly Conservation some ten years ago, as a new recruit to the wonderful world of moths, I never envisaged becoming part of the main committee let alone finding myself on this ‘lofty perch’! Firstly, I would like to register my and the Branch’s thanks to Pete Eeles for his support and enthusiasm for the branch during his time as chair, despite the pressures of a job that often saw him away from the country, and to the other members of the main committee for their support and enthusiasm over the past twelve months.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control September 12-16, 2005 Mark S. Hoddle, Compiler University of California, Riverside U.S.A. Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2005-08 Department of Service September 2005 Agriculture Volume II Papers were submitted in an electronic format, and were edited to achieve a uniform format and typeface. Each contributor is responsible for the accuracy and content of his or her own paper. Statements of the contributors from outside of the U.S. Department of Agriculture may not necessarily reflect the policy of the Department. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. Any references to pesticides appearing in these papers does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of them by the conference sponsors, nor does it imply that uses discussed have been registered. Use of most pesticides is regulated by state and federal laws. Applicable regulations must be obtained from the appropriate regulatory agency prior to their use. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife if they are not handled and applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices given on the label for use and disposal of pesticides and pesticide containers. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status.
    [Show full text]