DOCSLIB.ORG

Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain CHRONIC NONCANCER PAINNONCANCER CHRONIC Evidence Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain CHRONIC NONCANCER PAINNONCANCER CHRONIC Evidence Review CLINICAL GUIDELINE FOR THE USE OF CHRONIC OPIOID THERAPY IN CLINICAL GUIDELINE FOR THE USE OF CHRONIC OPIOID THERAPY IN GUIDELINE FOR THE Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain CHRONIC NONCANCER PAIN Evidence Review The American Pain Society in Conjunction with The American Academy of Pain Medicine EVIDENCE REVIEW APS-AAPM Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Purpose of evidence review ...................................................................... 1 Background 1 Previous guidelines ................................................................................... 2 Scope of evidence review 3 Key questions............................................................................................ 3 Populations................................................................................................ 7 Interventions.............................................................................................. 8 Outcomes.................................................................................................. 8 Conflict of interest............................................................................................. 10 Methods 10 Literature search and strategy................................................................... 10 Inclusion and exclusion criteria.................................................................. 11 Data extraction and synthesis ................................................................... 12 Systematic reviews ................................................................................ 12 Randomized trials on benefits and harms of interventions..................... 12 Observational studies on benefits and harms of interventions............... 14 Studies of risk prediction and diagnostic test accuracy.......................... 14 Dual review................................................................................................ 16 Assessing research applicability and clinical relevance (including magnitude of benefits and harms) ............................................................. 16 Rating a body of evidence......................................................................... 17 Results 19 Size of literature reviewed ......................................................................... 19 Quality of included systematic reviews evaluating efficacy of opioids for chronic noncancer pain and randomized trials......................... 19 Research applicability................................................................................ 19 Key Questions 20 Key Question 1a. In patients being considered for opioids for chronic noncancer pain, how accurate are patient features or characteristics for predicting benefits of chronic opioid therapy? .............. 20 American Pain Society i EVIDENCE REVIEW APS-AAPM Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Key Question 1b. In patients being considered for opioids for chronic noncancer pain, how accurate are patient features or characteristics for predicting opioid-related harms? .................................. 22 Key Question 1c. In patients being considered for opioids for chronic noncancer pain, how accurate are patient features or characteristics for predicting aberrant drug-related behaviors?................. 24 Key Question 2. In patients being considered for opioids for chronic noncancer pain, how accurate are formal screening instruments for predicting benefits of opioid therapy, harms, or aberrant drug-related behaviors? .............................................................. 25 Key Question 3. In patients being considered for opioids for chronic noncancer pain, how effective is risk assessment for: a. Improving clinical outcomes?............................................................. b. Reducing risk of aberrant drug behaviors?........................................ 30 Key Question 4. What are the benefits (including long-term benefits) of opioids for chronic noncancer pain? ....................................... 31 Key Question 5. What are the harms (including long-term harms) of opioids for chronic noncancer pain? In patients at higher risk for abuse or addiction? ................................................................................... 41 Findings: Short-term adverse events .................................................... 42 Findings: Long-term adverse events, aberrant drug-related behaviors, endocrinologic adverse events, and falls/fractures............... 48 Findings: Other data on harms ............................................................. 49 Key Question 6. What are the benefits and harms of opioids for noncancer pain in patients with a history of substance abuse or addiction that are undergoing treatment for addiction? ............................. 51 Key Question 7. What are the comparative benefits and harms of different opioids and different formulations of opioids for chronic noncancer pain?........................................................................................ 52 Findings: Comparisons between one opioid and another opioid........... 53 Findings: Comparisons between sustained-release and immediate-release formulations of opioids or tramadol ......................... 58 Findings: Comparisons between tramadol versus opioids.................... 60 American Pain Society ii EVIDENCE REVIEW APS-AAPM Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Key Question 8. Do the comparative benefits and harms of opioids vary in subpopulations defined by demographics (e.g. age, gender, race), specific underlying pain conditions, or co-morbidities (e.g. liver disease, renal disease, respiratory disease, heart disease, HIV, drug misuse, cancer survivors)?........................................................ 61 Key Question 9. How effective are different strategies for minimizing or treating opioid-related adverse events? .............................. 62 Key Question 10. How does initial or chronic use of opioids impact driving or work safety?............................................................................... 65 Key Question 11. What are the benefits and harms of different methods for initiating and titrating opioids for chronic noncancer pain? .... 68 Key Question 12. What are the benefits and harms of round-the- clock versus as needed dosing of opioids, or round-the-clock with as needed dosing versus as needed dosing alone for chronic noncancer pain? ......................................................................................................... 70 Key Question 13. What are the benefits and harms of regular intramuscular, subcutaneous, intranasal, buccal, or rectal versus oral or transdermal administration of opioids for chronic noncancer pain? ......................................................................................................... 71 Key Question 14. What are the comparative benefits of different strategies for treating acute exacerbations of pain or a new acute pain problem in patients on chronic opioids for chronic noncancer pain? ......................................................................................................... 72 Key Question 15. What are the benefits and harms of opioid rotation versus continued treatment or dose escalation with the same opioid in patients with chronic noncancer pain? .............................. 74 Key Question 16. What are the benefits and harms of different methods for switching patients on opioids for chronic noncancer pain from one opioid to another?............................................................... 75 Key Question 17. How accurate are patient characteristics or features for predicting lack of response to high doses of opioids for chronic noncancer pain? ........................................................................... 76 Key Question 18. How do dose-related responses for opioids change at different dose ranges or with long-term use?............................ 76 Key Question 19. What are the benefits and harms of high (>200 mg/day of morphine or equivalent) versus lower doses of opioids for chronic noncancer pain? ...................................................................... 77 American Pain Society iii EVIDENCE REVIEW APS-AAPM Clinical Guidelines for the Use of Chronic Opioid Therapy in Chronic Noncancer Pain TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Key Question 20. Are high doses of opioids associated with different or unique harms compared to lower doses?................................ 77 Key Question 21. How effective are patient education methods or clinician advice for improving outcomes associated with chronic opioid therapy?.......................................................................................... 78 Key Question 22. How effective is co-prescription with other pain- attenuating medications or combining opioids for improving pain control or decreasing adverse events associated with opioid analgesics?................................................................................................ 79 Key Question 23. What is the effect of concomitant use of drugs with CNS effects on adverse events associated with opioids for chronic noncancer pain? ........................................................................... 82 Key Question 24. What are the benefits associated with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of in Silico Approach for Prediction of Presence of Opioid Peptides in Wheat
    Evaluation of in silico approach for prediction of presence of opioid peptides in wheat This is the Accepted version of the following publication Garg, Swati, Apostolopoulos, Vasso, Nurgali, Kulmira and Mishra, Vijay Kumar (2018) Evaluation of in silico approach for prediction of presence of opioid peptides in wheat. Journal of Functional Foods, 41. 34 - 40. ISSN 1756-4646 The publisher’s official version can be found at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756464617307454 Note that access to this version may require subscription. Downloaded from VU Research Repository https://vuir.vu.edu.au/36577/ 1 1 Evaluation of in silico approach for prediction of presence of opioid peptides in wheat 2 gluten 3 Abstract 4 Opioid like morphine and codeine are used for the management of pain, but are associated 5 with serious side-effects limiting their use. Wheat gluten proteins were assessed for the 6 presence of opioid peptides on the basis of tyrosine and proline within their sequence. Eleven 7 peptides were identified and occurrence of predicted sequences or their structural motifs were 8 analysed using BIOPEP database and ranked using PeptideRanker. Based on higher peptide 9 ranking, three sequences YPG, YYPG and YIPP were selected for determination of opioid 10 activity by cAMP assay against µ and κ opioid receptors. Three peptides inhibited the 11 production of cAMP to varied degree with EC50 values of YPG, YYPG and YIPP were 5.3 12 mM, 1.5 mM and 2.9 mM for µ-opioid receptor, and 1.9 mM, 1.2 mM and 3.2 mM for κ- 13 opioid receptor, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • INVESTIGATION of NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS for the DEVELOPMENT of OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS by Katherine M
    INVESTIGATION OF NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS By Katherine M. Prevatt-Smith Submitted to the graduate degree program in Medicinal Chemistry and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________________ Chairperson: Dr. Thomas E. Prisinzano _________________________________ Dr. Brian S. J. Blagg _________________________________ Dr. Michael F. Rafferty _________________________________ Dr. Paul R. Hanson _________________________________ Dr. Susan M. Lunte Date Defended: July 18, 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Katherine M. Prevatt-Smith certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: INVESTIGATION OF NATURAL PRODUCT SCAFFOLDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OPIOID RECEPTOR LIGANDS _________________________________ Chairperson: Dr. Thomas E. Prisinzano Date approved: July 18, 2012 ii ABSTRACT Kappa opioid (KOP) receptors have been suggested as an alternative target to the mu opioid (MOP) receptor for the treatment of pain because KOP activation is associated with fewer negative side-effects (respiratory depression, constipation, tolerance, and dependence). The KOP receptor has also been implicated in several abuse-related effects in the central nervous system (CNS). KOP ligands have been investigated as pharmacotherapies for drug abuse; KOP agonists have been shown to modulate dopamine concentrations in the CNS as well as attenuate the self-administration of cocaine in a variety of species, and KOP antagonists have potential in the treatment of relapse. One drawback of current opioid ligand investigation is that many compounds are based on the morphine scaffold and thus have similar properties, both positive and negative, to the parent molecule. Thus there is increasing need to discover new chemical scaffolds with opioid receptor activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Biased Versus Partial Agonism in the Search for Safer Opioid Analgesics
    molecules Review Biased versus Partial Agonism in the Search for Safer Opioid Analgesics Joaquim Azevedo Neto 1 , Anna Costanzini 2 , Roberto De Giorgio 2 , David G. Lambert 3 , Chiara Ruzza 1,4,* and Girolamo Calò 1 1 Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical Sciences, Section of Pharmacology, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; [email protected] (J.A.N.); [email protected] (G.C.) 2 Department of Morphology, Surgery, Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy; [email protected] (A.C.); [email protected] (R.D.G.) 3 Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK; [email protected] 4 Technopole of Ferrara, LTTA Laboratory for Advanced Therapies, 44122 Ferrara, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Academic Editor: Helmut Schmidhammer Received: 23 July 2020; Accepted: 23 August 2020; Published: 25 August 2020 Abstract: Opioids such as morphine—acting at the mu opioid receptor—are the mainstay for treatment of moderate to severe pain and have good efficacy in these indications. However, these drugs produce a plethora of unwanted adverse effects including respiratory depression, constipation, immune suppression and with prolonged treatment, tolerance, dependence and abuse liability. Studies in β-arrestin 2 gene knockout (βarr2( / )) animals indicate that morphine analgesia is potentiated − − while side effects are reduced, suggesting that drugs biased away from arrestin may manifest with a reduced-side-effect profile. However, there is controversy in this area with improvement of morphine-induced constipation and reduced respiratory effects in βarr2( / ) mice. Moreover, − − studies performed with mice genetically engineered with G-protein-biased mu receptors suggested increased sensitivity of these animals to both analgesic actions and side effects of opioid drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 36/Monday, February 24, 2020
    10466 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 36 / Monday, February 24, 2020 / Notices Controlled substance Drug code Schedule Alphamethadol ................................................................................................................................................................. 9605 I Benzethidine .................................................................................................................................................................... 9606 I Betacetylmethadol ........................................................................................................................................................... 9607 I Clonitazene ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9612 I Diampromide ................................................................................................................................................................... 9615 I Diethylthiambutene .......................................................................................................................................................... 9616 I Dimethylthiambutene ....................................................................................................................................................... 9619 I Ketobemidone .................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Methadone Hydrochloride Tablets, USP) 5 Mg, 10 Mg Rx Only
    ROXANE LABORATORIES, INC. Columbus, OH 43216 DOLOPHINE® HYDROCHLORIDE CII (Methadone Hydrochloride Tablets, USP) 5 mg, 10 mg Rx Only Deaths, cardiac and respiratory, have been reported during initiation and conversion of pain patients to methadone treatment from treatment with other opioid agonists. It is critical to understand the pharmacokinetics of methadone when converting patients from other opioids (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Particular vigilance is necessary during treatment initiation, during conversion from one opioid to another, and during dose titration. Respiratory depression is the chief hazard associated with methadone hydrochloride administration. Methadone's peak respiratory depressant effects typically occur later, and persist longer than its peak analgesic effects, particularly in the early dosing period. These characteristics can contribute to cases of iatrogenic overdose, particularly during treatment initiation and dose titration. In addition, cases of QT interval prolongation and serious arrhythmia (torsades de pointes) have been observed during treatment with methadone. Most cases involve patients being treated for pain with large, multiple daily doses of methadone, although cases have been reported in patients receiving doses commonly used for maintenance treatment of opioid addiction. Methadone treatment for analgesic therapy in patients with acute or chronic pain should only be initiated if the potential analgesic or palliative care benefit of treatment with methadone is considered and outweighs the risks. Conditions For Distribution And Use Of Methadone Products For The Treatment Of Opioid Addiction Code of Federal Regulations, Title 42, Sec 8 Methadone products when used for the treatment of opioid addiction in detoxification or maintenance programs, shall be dispensed only by opioid treatment programs (and agencies, practitioners or institutions by formal agreement with the program sponsor) certified by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and approved by the designated state authority.
    [Show full text]
  • 204760Orig1s000
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 204760Orig1s000 OTHER REVIEW(S) MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH DATE: September 16, 2014 FROM: Julie Beitz, MD SUBJECT: Approval Action TO: NDA 204760 Movantik (naloxegol) tablets AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP Summary Naloxegol is an antagonist of opioid binding at the muͲopioid receptor. When administered at the recommended dose levels, naloxegol functions as a peripherallyͲacting opioid receptor antagonist in tissues such as the gastrointestinal tract, thereby decreasing the constipating effects of opioids. Naloxegol is a PEGylated derivative of naloxone and a new molecular entity. Pegylation confers the following properties: naloxegol has reduced passive permeability across membranes compared to naloxone; naloxegol is a PͲglycoprotein (PͲgp) efflux transporter substrate; and naloxegol is orally bioavailable. The reduced passive permeability and PͲgp efflux transporter properties limit CNS entry of naloxegol compared to naloxone. This memo documents my concurrence with the Division of Gastroenterology and Inborn Errors Product’s recommendation for approval of NDA 204760 for Movantik (naloxegol) tablets for the treatment of opioidͲinduced constipation (OIC) in adult patients with chronic nonͲcancer pain. Discussions regarding product labeling, and postmarketing study requirements and commitments have been satisfactorily completed. There are no inspectional issues that preclude approval. Dosing The recommended dose of Movantik (naloxegol) tablets is 25 mg taken once daily in the morning on an empty stomach. Patients who do not tolerate this dose, may reduce the dose to 12.5 mg once daily. Maintenance laxatives should be discontinued prior to initiation of therapy with Movantik.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Synthesis of Cyclic Analogs of the Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonist Arodyn
    Design and synthesis of cyclic analogs of the kappa opioid receptor antagonist arodyn By © 2018 Solomon Aguta Gisemba Submitted to the graduate degree program in Medicinal Chemistry and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Dr. Blake Peterson Co-Chair: Dr. Jane Aldrich Dr. Michael Rafferty Dr. Teruna Siahaan Dr. Thomas Tolbert Date Defended: 18 April 2018 The dissertation committee for Solomon Aguta Gisemba certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Design and synthesis of cyclic analogs of the kappa opioid receptor antagonist arodyn Chair: Dr. Blake Peterson Co-Chair: Dr. Jane Aldrich Date Approved: 10 June 2018 ii Abstract Opioid receptors are important therapeutic targets for mood disorders and pain. Kappa opioid receptor (KOR) antagonists have recently shown potential for treating drug addiction and 1,2,3 4 8 depression. Arodyn (Ac[Phe ,Arg ,D-Ala ]Dyn A(1-11)-NH2), an acetylated dynorphin A (Dyn A) analog, has demonstrated potent and selective KOR antagonism, but can be rapidly metabolized by proteases. Cyclization of arodyn could enhance metabolic stability and potentially stabilize the bioactive conformation to give potent and selective analogs. Accordingly, novel cyclization strategies utilizing ring closing metathesis (RCM) were pursued. However, side reactions involving olefin isomerization of O-allyl groups limited the scope of the RCM reactions, and their use to explore structure-activity relationships of aromatic residues. Here we developed synthetic methodology in a model dipeptide study to facilitate RCM involving Tyr(All) residues. Optimized conditions that included microwave heating and the use of isomerization suppressants were applied to the synthesis of cyclic arodyn analogs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opioid Epidemic: What Labs Have to Do with It?
    The Opioid Epidemic: What labs have to do with it? Ewa King, Ph.D. Associate Director of Health RIDOH State Health Laboratories Analysis. Answers. Action. www.aphl.org Overview • Overdose trends • Opioids and their effects • Analytical testing approaches • Toxicology laboratories Analysis. Answers. Action. www.aphl.org Opioid overdose crisis 1 Analysis. Answers. Action. www.aphl.org Opioid overdose crisis 2 Analysis. Answers. Action. www.aphl.org Opiates and Opioids • Opiates vs. Opioids • Opiates: Naturally occurring, derived from the poppy plant • Opioids: “Opiate-like” drugs in effects, not chemical structure Includes opiates • Narcotic analgesics • CNS depressants • DEA Schedule I or II controlled substances • Additive effect with other CNS depressant drugs Analysis. Answers. Action. www.aphl.org Efficacy of Opioids • How do opioids work? • Bind with opioid receptors • Brain, spinal cord, GI tract, and throughout the body • Pain, emotion, breathing, movement, and digestion Opioid Receptor Analysis. Answers. Action. www.aphl.org Effects of Opioids Physiological Psychological • Pain relief • Drowsiness/ sedation • Cough suppression • Mental confusion • GI motility • Loss of memory • Respiratory depression • Lethargy/ apathy • Pupillary constriction • Euphoria/ tranquility • Itching • Mood swings • Constipation • Depression • Dependence • Withdrawal • Dependence Analysis. Answers. Action. www.aphl.org Opiates 1 Opiates • Naturally occurring alkaloids Opium • Latex from the opium poppy plant Codeine: • Mild to moderate pain • Antitussive Morphine: • Severe pain • Metabolite of codeine and heroin Analysis. Answers. Action. www.aphl.org Opiates 2 Semi-synthetic Opiates: • Synthesized from a natural opiate Heroin: • Schedule I narcotic Hydrocodone (Vicodin): • Mild to moderate pain • Metabolizes to hydromorphone (Dilaudid) Oxycodone (Oxycontin/Percocet): • Moderate to severe pain • Metabolizes to oxymorphone (Opana) Analysis. Answers. Action.
    [Show full text]
  • ESTIMATED WORLD REQUIREMENTS of NARCOTIC DRUGS in GRAMS for 2019 (As of 10 January 2019 )
    ESTIMATED WORLD REQUIREMENTS OF NARCOTIC DRUGS IN GRAMS FOR 2019 (as of 10 January 2019 ) Afghanistan Cannabis 50 Codeine 50 000 Cannabis resin 1 Dextropropoxyphene 10 000 Coca leaf 1 Diphenoxylate 5 000 Cocaine 15 Fentanyl 1 Codeine 650 000 Methadone 20 000 Codeine -N-oxide 1 Morphine 8 000 Dextromoramide 1 Pethidine 90 000 Dextropropoxyphene 200 000 Pholcodine 40 000 Difenoxin 1 Albania Dihydrocodeine 1 Cocaine 1 Diphenoxylate 1 Codeine 1 189 000 Dipipanone 1 Fentanyl 300 Ecgonine 2 Heroin 1 Ethylmorphine 1 Methadone 7 000 Etorphine 1 Morphine 7 800 Fentanyl 17 000 Oxycodone 2 000 Heroin 1 Pethidine 2 700 Hydrocodone 10 000 Pholcodine 1 500 Hydromorphone 4 000 Remifentanil 9 Ketobemidone 1 Sufentanil 2 Levorphanol 1 Algeria Methadone 100 000 Alfentanil 350 Morphine 1 550 000 Codeine 2 500 000 Morphine -N-oxide 1 Etorphine 1 Nicomorphine 1 Fentanyl 500 Norcodeine 1 Methadone 4 000 Normethadone 1 Morphine 9 000 Normorphine 1 Oxycodone 4 000 Opium 10 Pethidine 3 000 Oripavine 1 Pholcodine 1 500 000 Oxycodone 60 000 Remifentanil 1 Oxymorphone 1 Sufentanil 30 Pethidine 50 000 Andorra Phenoperidine 1 Cannabis 2 000 Pholcodine 1 Fentanyl 100 Piritramide 1 Methadone 1 000 Remifentanil 20 000 Morphine 500 Sufentanil 10 Oxycodone 2 000 Thebacon 1 Pethidine 500 Thebaine 70 000 Remifentanil 4 Tilidine 1 Angola Armenia Alfentanil 20 Codeine 3 000 Codeine 21 600 Fentanyl 40 Dextromoramide 188 Methadone 13 500 Dextropropoxyphene 200 Morphine 7 500 Dihydrocodeine 500 Thebaine 15 Diphenoxylate 300 Trimeperidine 1 500 Fentanyl 63 Aruba* Methadone 2 000
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    The direct and modulatory antinociceptive actions of endogenous and exogenous opioid delta agonists Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Vanderah, Todd William. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 00:14:57 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/187190 INFORMATION TO USERS This ~uscript }las been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely. event that the author did not send UMI a complete mannscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginnjng at the upper left-hand comer and contimJing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid Powders Page: 1 of 9
    Federal Employee Program® 1310 G Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 202.942.1000 Fax 202.942.1125 5.70.64 Section: Prescription Drugs Effective Date: April 1, 2020 Subsection: Analgesics and Anesthetics Original Policy Date: October 20, 2017 Subject: Opioid Powders Page: 1 of 9 Last Review Date: March 13, 2020 Opioid Powders Description Buprenorphine Powder, Butorphanol Powder, Codeine Powder, Hydrocodone Powder, Hydromorphone Powder, Levorphanol Powder, Meperidine Powder, Methadone Powder, Morphine Powder, Oxycodone Powder, Oxymorphone Powder Background Pharmacy compounding is an ancient practice in which pharmacists combine, mix or alter ingredients to create unique medications that meet specific needs of individual patients. Some examples of the need for compounding products would be: the dosage formulation must be changed to allow a person with dysphagia (trouble swallowing) to have a liquid formulation of a commercially available tablet only product, or to obtain the exact strength needed of the active ingredient, to avoid ingredients that a particular patient has an allergy to, or simply to add flavoring to medication to make it more palatable. Buprenorphine, butorphanol, codeine, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, levorphanol, meperidine, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, and oxymorphone powders are opioid drugs that are used for pain control. The intent of the criteria is to provide coverage consistent with product labeling, FDA guidance, standards of medical practice, evidence-based drug information, and/or published guidelines. Because of the risks of addiction, abuse, and misuse with opioids, even at recommended doses, and because of the greater risks of overdose and death (1-15). Regulatory Status 5.70.64 Section: Prescription Drugs Effective Date: April 1, 2020 Subsection: Analgesics and Anesthetics Original Policy Date: October 20, 2017 Subject: Opioid Powders Page: 2 of 9 FDA-approved indications: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dezocine Exhibits Antihypersensitivity Activities in Neuropathy Through
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Dezocine exhibits antihypersensitivity activities in neuropathy through spinal Received: 09 November 2016 Accepted: 19 January 2017 μ-opioid receptor activation and Published: 23 February 2017 norepinephrine reuptake inhibition Yong-Xiang Wang1, Xiao-Fang Mao1, Teng-Fei Li1, Nian Gong1 & Ma-Zhong Zhang2 Dezocine is the number one opioid painkiller prescribed and sold in China, occupying 44% of the nation’s opioid analgesics market today and far ahead of the gold-standard morphine. We discovered the mechanisms underlying dezocine antihypersensitivity activity and assessed their implications to antihypersensitivity tolerance. Dezocine, given subcutaneously in spinal nerve-ligated neuropathic rats, time- and dose-dependently produced mechanical antiallodynia and thermal antihyperalgesia, significantly increased ipsilateral spinal norepinephrine and serotonin levels, and induced less antiallodynic tolerance than morphine. Its mechanical antiallodynia was partially (40% or 60%) and completely (100%) attenuated by spinal μ-opioid receptor (MOR) antagonism or norepinephrine depletion/α2-adrenoceptor antagonism and combined antagonism of MORs and α2-adenoceptors, respectively. In contrast, antagonism of spinal κ-opioid receptors (KORs) and δ-opioid receptors (DORs) or depletion of spinal serotonin did not significantly alter dezocine antiallodynia. In addition, dezocine- delayed antiallodynic tolerance was accelerated by spinal norepinephrine depletion/α2-adenoceptor antagonism. Thus dezocine produces antihypersensitivity activity through spinal MOR activation and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition (NRI), but apparently not through spinal KOR and DOR activation, serotonin reuptake inhibition or other mechanisms. Our findings reclassify dezocine as the first analgesic of the recently proposed MOR-NRI, and reveal its potential as an alternative to as well as concurrent use with morphine in treating pain.
    [Show full text]