Some Characterizations of Involute-Evolute Curve Couple In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Some Characterizations of Involute-Evolute Curve Couple In Computa & tio d n ie a l l Abdel-Aziz et al., J Appl Computat Math 2019, 8:2 p M p a Journal of A t h f e o m l a a n t r ISSN: 2168-9679i c u s o J Applied & Computational Mathematics Research Article Open Access Some Characterizations of Involute-Evolute Curve Couple in the Hyperbolic Space Abdel-Aziz HS1*, Saad MK2 and Abdel-Salam AA1 1Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, 82524 Sohag, Egypt 2Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Madinah, 170 Madinah, Saudi Arabia Abstract This paper aims to show that Frenet apparatus of an evolute curve can be formed according to apparatus of the involute curve in hyperbolic space. We establish relationships among Frenet frame on involute-evolute curve couple in hyperbolic 2-space, hyperbolic 3-space and de Sitter 3-space. Finally, we illustrate some numerical examples in support our main results. Keywords: Frenet frames; Involute-evolute curves; Hyperbolic equations and for more details see [1,6]. In this paper, we calculate space; De Sitter space. the Frenet apparatus of the evolute curve by apparatus of the involute curve in hyperbolic 2-space, hyperbolic 3-space, and de Sitter 3-space. Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). 53A25, 53C50. Our results can be seen as refinement and generalization of many Introduction corresponding results exist in the literature and useful in mathematical modeling and some other applications. The idea of a string involute is due to, who is also known for his work in optics [1]. He discovered involutes while trying to develop a Preliminaries more accurate clock [2]. The involute of a given curve is a well-known In this section, we use the basic notions and results in Lorentzian 3 concept in Euclidean 3-space [3]. It is well-known that, if a curve geometry for Frenet frame in hyperbolic 2-space, hyperbolic 3-space is differentiable at each point of an open interval, a set of mutually and de Sitter 3-space [3-8]. orthogonal unit vectors can be constructed and called Frenet frame or Moving frame vectors [4]. The rates of these frame vectors along Hyperbolic 2-space the curve define curvatures of the curves. The set, whose elements are Let 3 ={(,,)|,,xxx xxx∈ } be a 3-dimensional vector space, frame vectors and curvatures of a curve, is called Frenet apparatus of 123 123 and x(x ,x ,x ) and y=(y ,y ,y ) be two vectors in 3. The pseudo scalar the curves [5]. 1 2 3 1 2 3 product of x and y is defined by 〈x,= y 〉− xy11 + xy 2 2 + xy 33. We call 3 It is safe to report that the many important results in the theory ( ,,)〈〉 a 3-dimensional pseudo Euclidean space, or Minkowski 3 3 of the curves in were initiated by G. Monge, and G. Darboux 3-space. We write 3 instead of ( ,,)〈〉 . We say that a vector x in 3 pioneered the moving frame idea [6]. Thereafter, Frenet defined his is spacelike, lightlike or timelike if 〈〉xx, >0, 〈〉xx, =0 or 〈〉xx, <0, moving frame and his special equations which play important role in respectively. We now define spheres in 3 as follows: mechanics and kinematics as well as in differential geometry. At the 1 2 3 222 beginning of the twentieth century, Einstein’s theory opened a door to + = {x∈1 | −+ xxx 1 23 += − 1, x 1 ≥ 1} use of new geometries [7]. One of them, Minkowski space-time, which 2 3 222 − = {x∈1 | − xxx 1 + 23 += − 1, x 1 ≤− 1} is simultaneously the geometry of special relativity and the geometry 2 3 222 1= {x∈ 1 | −+ xxx 1 23 + = 1}. induced on each fixed tangent space of an arbitrary Lorentzian manifold, was introduced and some of the classical differential geometry topics 2 2 We call ± a hyperbola and 1 a pseudo-sphere. Now, we discuss have been treated by the researchers [8]. In recent years, the theory some basic facts of curves in Hyperbolic 2-space, which are needed in of degenerate submanifolds has been treated by researchers and some the sequel. classical differential geometry topics have been extended to Lorentz γγ:I→⊂23; ()=(t xtxtxt (), (), ()) manifolds. For instance, in [9-11], the authors extended and studied Let + 1 123 be a smooth regular 2 ' spacelike involute-evolute curves in Euclidean 4-space and Minkowski curve in + (ie . .,γ ( t )≠ 0) for any t I, where I is an open interval. space-time. ∊ An evolute and its involute, are defined in mutual pairs. The evolute and the involute of the curve pair are well known by the *Corresponding author: Abdel-Aziz HS, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Sohag University, 82524 Sohag, Egypt, Tel: 0966508163256; E-mail: mathematicians especially the differential geometry scientists. The [email protected] evolute of any curve is defined as the locus of the centers of curvature Received January 15, 2019; Accepted January 22, 2019; Published January 29, of the curve. The original curves are then defined as the involute of the 2019 evolute. The simplest case is that of a circle, which has only one center Citation: Abdel-Aziz HS, Saad MK, Abdel-Salam AA (2019) Some Characterizations of curvature (its center), which is a degenerate evolute and the circle of Involute-Evolute Curve Couple in the Hyperbolic Space. J Appl Computat Math itself is the involute of this point. 8: 436. Izumiya, et al. defined the evolute curve in hyperbolic 2-space Copyright: © 2019 Abdel-Aziz HS, et al. This is an open-access article distributed and found its equation. Following the works of them, we defined the under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the evolute curve in hyperbolic 3-space and de Sitter 3-space and find its original author and source are credited. J Appl Computat Math, an open access journal Volume 8 • Issue 2 • 1000436 ISSN: 2168-9679 Citation: Abdel-Aziz HS, Saad MK, Abdel-Salam AA (2019) Some Characterizations of Involute-Evolute Curve Couple in the Hyperbolic Space. J Appl Computat Math 8: 436. Page 2 of 9 It is easy to show that 〈〉γγ'' , for any ∈ . We call such a z=( zzzz , , , ) (),tt () >0 tI For any x=( xxxx1234 , , , ), y=( yyyy1234 , , , ) and 1234 3 4 curve a spacelike curve. The norm of the vector x ∈ 1 is defined by ∈ 1 , the pseudo vector product of x,y and z is defined as follows: x=|〈〉 xx , |. The arc-length of a spacelike curveγ , measured from t −ijkl ' γ (tt ), ∈ I is s()= tγ () t dt . Then the parameter s is determined 00 ∫t xxxx ∧∧ 1234 dsγ () xyz= such that γ(s ) =1, where γ(s )= . So we say that a spacelike yyyy1234 ds zzzz1234 curve γ is parameterized by arc-length, if it satisfies γ(s ) =1. xxx xxxxxx xxx Throughout the remainder in this paper, we denote the parameter s of 234 134124 123 γ as the arc-length parameter. Let us denote T()=ssγ (), and we call =−−yyy234 , yyyyyy 134124 ,,− yyy 123 . T(s) a unit tangent vector of γ at s. zzz234 zzzzzz 134124 zzz 123 x=( xxx , , ), y =( yy , , y )∈ 3 For any 123 12 3 1, the pseudo vector We now prepare some basic facts of curves in hyperbolic 3-space. product of x and y is defined as follows: 34 Let γγ:I→⊂+ 1; ()=(t xtxtxtxt 1234 (), (), (), ()) be a smooth −ee e 12 3 3 ' regular curve in + (ie . .,γ ( t )≠ 0) for any tI∈ where I is an open x∧ y= x1 x 2 x 3= (−− ( xy 23 xy 32 ), xy 31 − xy 13 , xy 12 − xy 21 ). interval. So that, 〈〉γγ''(),tt () >0 for any tI∈ . The arc-length of γ, yyy1 23 t γ (tt ), ∈ I s()= tγ ' () t dt 〈∧ 〉 measured from is ∫t . Then the parameter We remark that x y,= z det ( x y z ). Hence, x y is pseudo- dsγ () orthogonal to x,y. We now set a vector ET()=sssγ ()∧ (). By s is determined such that γ(s ) =1, where γ . So we say ∧ (s )= definition, we can calculate that 〈〉EE(),()ss =1 and 〈γγ(),()ss 〉− = 1. ds that, a spacelike curve γ is parameterized by arc-length if it satisfies that We can also show that TE()ss∧− ()=γ () s and γ ()ss∧−ET ()= (). s γ(s ) =1. Let us denote T()=ssγ (), and we call T(s) a unit tangent Therefore, we have a pseudo-orthonormal frame {γ (sss ),TE ( ), ( )} vector of γ at s. along γ ()s . We have the following hyperbolic Frenet-Serret formula of plane curves: Here, we construct the explicit differential geometry on curves 3 3 3 in + (− 1) . Let γ :I →−+ ( 1) be a regular curve. Since + (− 1) γ()=ssT () is a Riemannian manifold, we can reparameterize γ by the arc- γκ+ (1) 3TE()=s () sg () ss () length. Hence, we may assume that γ(s) is a unit speed curve. So we −κ ET()=sg () ss (), have the tangent vector T()=ssγ () with T =1. In case, when , then we have a unit vector or in the matrix form: TT(),()ss≠− 1 γγ()ss 0 1 0 () T ()ss− γ () N(s )= . κ (2) T ()ss− γ () TT()ss= 1 0g () −κ EE()ss 0g 0 () Moreover, define E()=sssγ ()∧∧ TN () () s, then we have a pseudo orthonormal frame {γ (ssss ),TNE ( ), ( ), ( )} of 4 along γ. By standard where k is the geodesic curvature of the curve γ in 2 , which is given 1 g + ≠− by arguments, under the assumption that TT(),()ss 1, we have the following Frenet formulae: κγ()=sdetsss (()TT () ()).
Recommended publications
  • Differential Geometry
    Differential Geometry J.B. Cooper 1995 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 CURVES AND SURFACES—INFORMAL DISCUSSION 2 1.1 Surfaces ................................ 13 2 CURVES IN THE PLANE 16 3 CURVES IN SPACE 29 4 CONSTRUCTION OF CURVES 35 5 SURFACES IN SPACE 41 6 DIFFERENTIABLEMANIFOLDS 59 6.1 Riemannmanifolds .......................... 69 1 1 CURVES AND SURFACES—INFORMAL DISCUSSION We begin with an informal discussion of curves and surfaces, concentrating on methods of describing them. We shall illustrate these with examples of classical curves and surfaces which, we hope, will give more content to the material of the following chapters. In these, we will bring a more rigorous approach. Curves in R2 are usually specified in one of two ways, the direct or parametric representation and the implicit representation. For example, straight lines have a direct representation as tx + (1 t)y : t R { − ∈ } i.e. as the range of the function φ : t tx + (1 t)y → − (here x and y are distinct points on the line) and an implicit representation: (ξ ,ξ ): aξ + bξ + c =0 { 1 2 1 2 } (where a2 + b2 = 0) as the zero set of the function f(ξ ,ξ )= aξ + bξ c. 1 2 1 2 − Similarly, the unit circle has a direct representation (cos t, sin t): t [0, 2π[ { ∈ } as the range of the function t (cos t, sin t) and an implicit representation x : 2 2 → 2 2 { ξ1 + ξ2 =1 as the set of zeros of the function f(x)= ξ1 + ξ2 1. We see from} these examples that the direct representation− displays the curve as the image of a suitable function from R (or a subset thereof, usually an in- terval) into two dimensional space, R2.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolute-Involute Partner Curves According to Darboux Frame in the Euclidean 3-Space E3
    Fundamentals of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences (2020) 1(2) 63 { 70 Evolute-Involute Partner Curves According to Darboux Frame in the Euclidean 3-space E3 Abdullah Yıldırım 1,∗ Feryat Kaya 2 1 Harran University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Mathematics S¸anlıurfa, T¨urkiye 2 S¸ehit Abdulkadir O˘guzAnatolian Imam Hatip High School S¸anlıurfa, T¨urkiye, [email protected] Received: 29 February 2020 Accepted: 29 June 2020 Abstract: In this study, evolute-involute curves are researched. Characterization of evolute-involute curves lying on the surface are examined according to Darboux frame and some curves are obtained. Keywords: Curve, surface, geodesic, curvature, frame. 1. Introduction The interest of special curves has increased recently. Some of these are associated curves. They are curves where one of the Frenet vectors at opposite points is linearly dependent to the other curve. One of the best examples of these curves is the evolute-involute partner curves. An involute thought known to have been used in his optical work came up in 1658 by C. Huygens. C. Huygens discovered involute curves while trying to make more accurate measurement studies [5]. Many researches have been conducted about evolute-involute partner curves. Some of them conducted recently are Bilici and C¸alı¸skan [4], Ozyılmaz¨ and Yılmaz [9], As and Sarıo˘glugil[2]. Bekta¸sand Y¨uceconsider the notion of the involute-evolute curves lying on the surfaces for a special situation. They determine the special involute-evolute partner D−curves in E3: By using the Darboux frame of the curves they obtain the necessary and sufficient conditions between κg , ∗ − ∗ ∗ τg; κn and κn for a curve to be the special involute partner D curve.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer-Aided Design and Kinematic Simulation of Huygens's
    applied sciences Article Computer-Aided Design and Kinematic Simulation of Huygens’s Pendulum Clock Gloria Del Río-Cidoncha 1, José Ignacio Rojas-Sola 2,* and Francisco Javier González-Cabanes 3 1 Department of Engineering Graphics, University of Seville, 41092 Seville, Spain; [email protected] 2 Department of Engineering Graphics, Design, and Projects, University of Jaen, 23071 Jaen, Spain 3 University of Seville, 41092 Seville, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-953-212452 Received: 25 November 2019; Accepted: 9 January 2020; Published: 10 January 2020 Abstract: This article presents both the three-dimensional modelling of the isochronous pendulum clock and the simulation of its movement, as designed by the Dutch physicist, mathematician, and astronomer Christiaan Huygens, and published in 1673. This invention was chosen for this research not only due to the major technological advance that it represented as the first reliable meter of time, but also for its historical interest, since this timepiece embodied the theory of pendular movement enunciated by Huygens, which remains in force today. This 3D modelling is based on the information provided in the only plan of assembly found as an illustration in the book Horologium Oscillatorium, whereby each of its pieces has been sized and modelled, its final assembly has been carried out, and its operation has been correctly verified by means of CATIA V5 software. Likewise, the kinematic simulation of the pendulum has been carried out, following the approximation of the string by a simple chain of seven links as a composite pendulum. The results have demonstrated the exactitude of the clock.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pope's Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics
    Bowling Green State University ScholarWorks@BGSU Honors Projects Honors College Spring 4-30-2018 The Pope's Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics Michael Gulas [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects Part of the Mathematics Commons, Ordinary Differential Equations and Applied Dynamics Commons, Other Applied Mathematics Commons, Partial Differential Equations Commons, and the Physics Commons Repository Citation Gulas, Michael, "The Pope's Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics" (2018). Honors Projects. 343. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/343 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at ScholarWorks@BGSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@BGSU. The Pope’s Rhinoceros and Quantum Mechanics Michael Gulas Honors Project Submitted to the Honors College at Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with University Honors May 2018 Dr. Steven Seubert Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics, Advisor Dr. Marco Nardone Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Advisor Contents 1 Abstract 5 2 Classical Mechanics7 2.1 Brachistochrone....................................... 7 2.2 Laplace Transforms..................................... 10 2.2.1 Convolution..................................... 14 2.2.2 Laplace Transform Table.............................. 15 2.2.3 Inverse Laplace Transforms ............................ 15 2.3 Solving Differential Equations Using Laplace
    [Show full text]
  • The Fractal Theory of the Saturn Ring
    523.46/.481 THE FRACTAL THEORY OF THE SATURN RING M.I.Zelikin Abstract The true reason for partition of the Saturn ring as well as rings of other plan- ets into great many of sub-rings is found. This reason is the theorem of Zelikin- Lokutsievskiy-Hildebrand about fractal structure of solutions to generic piece-wise smooth Hamiltonian systems. The instability of two-dimensional model of rings with continues surface density of particles distribution is proved both for Newtonian and for Boltzmann equations. We do not claim that we have solved the problem of stability of Saturn ring. We rather put questions and suggest some ideas and means for researches. 1 Introduction Up to the middle of XX century the astronomy went hand in hand with mathematics. So, it is no wonder that such seemingly purely astronomical problems as figures of equilibrium for rotating, gravitating liquids or the stability of Saturn Ring came to the attention of the most part of outstanding mathematicians. It will be suffice to mention Galilei, Huygens, Newton, Laplace, Maclaurin, Maupertuis, Clairaut, d’Alembert, Legendre, Liouville, Ja- cobi, Riemann, Poincar´e, Chebyshev, Lyapunov, Cartan and numerous others (see, for example, [1]). It is pertinent to recall the out of sight discussion between Poincar´eand Lyapunov regarding figures of equilibrium for rotating, gravitating liquids. Poincar´e, who obtained his results using not so rigorous reasoning and often by simple analogy, wrote, “It is possible to make many objections, but the same rigor as in pure analysis is not de- manded in mechanics”. Lyapunov had entirely different position: “It is impermissible to use doubtful reasonings when solving a problem in mechanics or physics (it is the same) if it is formulated quite definitely as a mathematical one.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cycloid Scott Morrison
    The cycloid Scott Morrison “The time has come”, the old man said, “to talk of many things: Of tangents, cusps and evolutes, of curves and rolling rings, and why the cycloid’s tautochrone, and pendulums on strings.” October 1997 1 Everyone is well aware of the fact that pendulums are used to keep time in old clocks, and most would be aware that this is because even as the pendu- lum loses energy, and winds down, it still keeps time fairly well. It should be clear from the outset that a pendulum is basically an object moving back and forth tracing out a circle; hence, we can ignore the string or shaft, or whatever, that supports the bob, and only consider the circular motion of the bob, driven by gravity. It’s important to notice now that the angle the tangent to the circle makes with the horizontal is the same as the angle the line from the bob to the centre makes with the vertical. The force on the bob at any moment is propor- tional to the sine of the angle at which the bob is currently moving. The net force is also directed perpendicular to the string, that is, in the instantaneous direction of motion. Because this force only changes the angle of the bob, and not the radius of the movement (a pendulum bob is always the same distance from its fixed point), we can write: θθ&& ∝sin Now, if θ is always small, which means the pendulum isn’t moving much, then sinθθ≈. This is very useful, as it lets us claim: θθ&& ∝ which tells us we have simple harmonic motion going on.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics, the Language of Watchmaking
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE 90LEARNINGprovidedL by Infoscience E- École polytechniqueA fédérale de LausanneRNINGLEARNINGLEARNING Mathematics, the language of watchmaking Morley’s theorem (1898) states that if you trisect the angles of any triangle and extend the trisecting lines until they meet, the small triangle formed in the centre will always be equilateral. Ilan Vardi 1 I am often asked to explain mathematics; is it just about numbers and equations? The best answer that I’ve found is that mathematics uses numbers and equations like a language. However what distinguishes it from other subjects of thought – philosophy, for example – is that in maths com- plete understanding is sought, mostly by discover- ing the order in things. That is why we cannot have real maths without formal proofs and why mathe- maticians study very simple forms to make pro- found discoveries. One good example is the triangle, the simplest geometric shape that has been studied since antiquity. Nevertheless the foliot world had to wait 2,000 years for Morley’s theorem, one of the few mathematical results that can be expressed in a diagram. Horology is of interest to a mathematician because pallet verge it enables a complete understanding of how a watch or clock works. His job is to impose a sequence, just as a conductor controls an orches- tra or a computer’s real-time clock controls data regulating processing. Comprehension of a watch can be weight compared to a violin where science can only con- firm the preferences of its maker.
    [Show full text]
  • Publication Named Lunar Formations by Blagg and Müller (Published in 1935)
    Lunar and Planetary Information Bulletin January 2018 • Issue 151 Contents Feature Story From the Desk of Jim Green News from Space Meeting Highlights Opportunities for Students Spotlight on Education In Memoriam Milestones New and Noteworthy Calendar Copyright 2018 The Lunar and Planetary Institute Issue 151 Page 2 of 76 January 2018 Feature Story Planetary Nomenclature: A Brief History and Overview Note from the Editors: This issue’s lead article is the ninth in a series of reports describing the history and current activities of the planetary research facilities partially funded by NASA and located nationwide. This issue provides a brief history and overview of planetary nomenclature, an important activity that provides structure and coordination to NASA’s planetary exploration program and the scientific analysis of planetary data. — Paul Schenk and Renée Dotson Humans have been naming the stars and planets for thousands of years, and many of these ancient names are still in use. For example, the Romans named the planet Mars for their god of war, and the satellites Phobos and Deimos, discovered in 1877, were named for the twin sons of Ares, the Greek god of war. In this age of orbiters, rovers, and high-resolution imagery, modern planetary nomenclature is used to uniquely identify a topographical, morphological, or albedo feature on the surface of a planet or satellite so that the feature can be easily located, described, and discussed by scientists and laypeople alike. History of Planetary Nomenclature With the invention of the telescope in 1608, astronomers from many countries began studying the Moon and other planetary bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Newton's Parabola Observed from Pappus
    Applied Physics Research; Vol. 11, No. 2; 2019 ISSN 1916-9639 E-ISSN 1916-9647 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Newton’s Parabola Observed from Pappus’ Directrix, Apollonius’ Pedal Curve (Line), Newton’s Evolute, Leibniz’s Subtangent and Subnormal, Castillon’s Cardioid, and Ptolemy’s Circle (Hodograph) (09.02.2019) Jiří Stávek1 1 Bazovského, Prague, Czech Republic Correspondence: Jiří Stávek, Bazovského 1228, 163 00 Prague, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] Received: February 2, 2019 Accepted: February 20, 2019 Online Published: February 25, 2019 doi:10.5539/apr.v11n2p30 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/apr.v11n2p30 Abstract Johannes Kepler and Isaac Newton inspired generations of researchers to study properties of elliptic, hyperbolic, and parabolic paths of planets and other astronomical objects orbiting around the Sun. The books of these two Old Masters “Astronomia Nova” and “Principia…” were originally written in the geometrical language. However, the following generations of researchers translated the geometrical language of these Old Masters into the infinitesimal calculus independently discovered by Newton and Leibniz. In our attempt we will try to return back to the original geometrical language and to present several figures with possible hidden properties of parabolic orbits. For the description of events on parabolic orbits we will employ the interplay of the directrix of parabola discovered by Pappus of Alexandria, the pedal curve with the pedal point in the focus discovered by Apollonius of Perga (The Great Geometer), and the focus occupied by our Sun discovered in several stages by Aristarchus, Copernicus, Kepler and Isaac Newton (The Great Mathematician).
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Tautochrone Curve Unique? Pedro Terra,A) Reinaldo De Melo E Souza,B) and C
    Is the tautochrone curve unique? Pedro Terra,a) Reinaldo de Melo e Souza,b) and C. Farinac) Instituto de Fısica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro RJ 21945-970, Brazil (Received 22 February 2016; accepted 9 September 2016) We show that there are an infinite number of tautochrone curves in addition to the cycloid solution first obtained by Christiaan Huygens in 1658. We begin by reviewing the inverse problem of finding the possible potential energy functions that lead to periodic motions of a particle whose period is a given function of its mechanical energy. There are infinitely many such solutions, called “sheared” potentials. As an interesting example, we show that a Poschl-Teller€ potential and the one-dimensional Morse potentials are sheared relative to one another for negative energies, clarifying why they share the same oscillation periods for their bounded solutions. We then consider periodic motions of a particle sliding without friction over a track around its minimum under the influence of a constant gravitational field. After a brief historical survey of the tautochrone problem we show that, given the oscillation period, there is an infinity of tracks that lead to the same period. As a bonus, we show that there are infinitely many tautochrones. VC 2016 American Association of Physics Teachers. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4963770] 3 I. INTRODUCTION instance, Pippard presents a nice graphical demonstration of sheared potentials, whereas Osypowski and Olsson4 provide In classical mechanics, we find essentially two kinds of a different demonstration with the aid of Laplace transforms. problems: (i) fundamental (or direct) problems, in which the Recent developments on this topic, and analogous quantum forces on a system are given and we must obtain the possible cases, can be found in Asorey et al.5 motions, and (ii) inverse problems, in which we know the In this article, our main goal is to analyze inverse prob- possible motions and must determine the forces that caused lems for periodic motions of a particle sliding on a friction- them.
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of Uncertainties in Atmospheric Properties Measured by Radio Occultation Experiments
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Advances in Space Research 46 (2010) 58–73 www.elsevier.com/locate/asr Prediction of uncertainties in atmospheric properties measured by radio occultation experiments Paul Withers Center for Space Physics, Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA Received 3 September 2008; received in revised form 9 November 2009; accepted 4 March 2010 Abstract Refraction due to gradients in ionospheric electron density, N e, and neutral number density, nn, can shift the frequency of radio sig- nals propagating through a planetary atmosphere. Radio occultation experiments measure time series of these frequency shifts, from which N e and nn can be determined. Major contributors to uncertainties in frequency shift are phase noise, which is controlled by the Allan Deviation of the experiment, and thermal noise, which is controlled by the signal-to-noise ratio of the experiment. We derive expressions relatingpffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi uncertainties in atmospheric properties to uncertainties in frequency shift. Uncertainty in N e is approximately 2 ð4prDf fcme0=Ve Þ 2pH p=R where rDf is uncertainty in frequency shift, f is the carrier frequency, c is the speed of light, me is the electron mass, 0 is the permittivity of free space, V isp speed,ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffie is the elementary charge, H p is a plasma scale height and R is planetary radius. Uncertainty in nn is approximately ðrDf c=Vf jÞ H n=2pR where j and H n are the refractive volume and scale height of the neutral atmo- sphere. Predictions from these expressions are consistent with the uncertainties of the radio occultation experiment on Mars Global Sur- veyor.
    [Show full text]
  • Christiaan Huygens and the Problem of the Hanging Chain John Bukowski
    Christiaan Huygens and the Problem of the Hanging Chain John Bukowski John Bukowski ([email protected]) is Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Mathematics at Juniata College in Huntingdon, Pennsylvania. He received B.S. degrees in mathematics and physics from Carnegie Mellon University and his Ph.D. in applied mathematics from Brown University. He currently serves as Governor of the Allegheny Mountain Section of the MAA. He was a 1998–1999 Project NExT Fellow (silver dot) and is now Co-Coordinator of his Section NExT program. He finds time to do mathematics when he is not busy as College Organist, choir accompanist, church organist, or piano soloist. One of his accomplishments at Juniata is his performance of a Mozart piano concerto in 2006. He and his wife Cathy Stenson (also a mathematician) have two sons, David and Daniel, who like to ask them mathematical questions. In his Discorsi [10] of 1638, Galileo wrote much about strength of materials and cross- sections of beams, and the parabola kept appearing in these contexts. After correctly instructing the reader how to draw such a curve via projectile motion, Galileo then explained,“Theothermethodofdrawingthedesiredcurve...isthefollowing:Drive two nails into a wall at a convenient height and at the same level. Over these two nails hang a light chain. This chain will assume the form of a parabola. .” If we follow Galileo’s instructions and hang such a chain, the resulting curve certainly looks like it could be a parabola. In fact, Galileo was merely stating what was commonly thought about the problem of the hanging chain at the time, as it was widely accepted in the early seventeenth century that a hanging chain did indeed take the form of a parabola.
    [Show full text]