DOCSLIB.ORG

Riots Killed the Anti-CAA Protest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Riots Killed the Anti-CAA Protest Indira’s Emergency and Modi’s Neo-Emergency Though the character and contents of the current neo-Emergency are different, there is a common thread between Emergency then and now- Governance by Force and Fear. M.G. Devasahayam Forty-five years ago around midnight on June survival and family aggrandisement. It was one 25/26, 1975, the President of India issued this big swoop overtaking the whole country proclamation: “In exercise of the powers spreading a psychosis of fear and terror…” conferred by clause (1) of Article 352 of the This was then. How about now? On the night Constitution, I, Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, President of March 24, 2020, Prime Minister Narendra of India, by this Proclamation declare that a Modi made a proclamation which took effect grave emergency exists whereby the security from midnight: “In the last two days, several of India is threatened by internal disturbances.” parts of the country have been put under I was then the District Magistrate of Chandigarh lockdown. These efforts by state governments Union Territory with Jayaprakash Narayan (JP), should be taken with utmost sincerity…. The the Enemy No.1 of the state as my prisoner. nation is taking a very important decision today. Hence, I had a fair insight of the happenings at From midnight tonight onwards, the entire high levels in Delhi. country, please listen carefully, the entire country This ‘National Emergency’ could be shall go under complete lockdown. In order to described as an instrument by Prime Minister protect the country, and each of its citizens, from Indira Gandhi to ‘govern a democratic polity midnight tonight, a full ban is being imposed on through despotic means’ and in the process people from stepping out of their homes. All the extinguishing freedom and liberty. With the States in the country, all the Union Territories, presidential proclamation, Fundamental Rights each district, each municipality, each village, under Article 14, Article 21 and several clauses each locality is being put under lockdown. This of Article 22 of the Constitution stood suspended. is like a curfew….” In short, India lost its democracy. Maintenance This proclamation was not under India’s of Internal Security Act and Rules were made Constitution. As acknowledged by the Prime harsh and courts were prohibited from Minister, states had imposed lockdown reviewing them, leave alone giving any relief to exercising power under Section 2 of the the preventive detainees which numbered over Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897. Disaster 100,000! Management Act-2005 (DMA) which was Civil Rights stalwart Rajni Kothari succinctly invoked to impose ‘complete lockdown’ do not described Indira’s Emergency era thus: “It was give any such specific powers to the central a state off-limits, a government that hijacked government. Section 6 (2) (i) only empowers it the whole edifice of the state, a ruling party and “to take such other measures for the prevention leader who in effect treated the state as their of disaster, or the mitigation, or preparedness...” personal estate. It was the imposition of a highly This provision does not relate to pandemic concentrated apparatus of power on a disaster. When state governments had already fundamentally federal society and the turning imposed lockdowns under the relevant law, over of this centralised apparatus for personal there was no need for central government to August 2020 THE RADICAL HUMANIST 3 override them and super-impose a draconian Then, when the infection has been properly nationwide lockdown that too with less than four incubated and intensified, through some hours’ notice. As it is, this has turned out to be a combination of incompetence and callousness, neo-Emergency that also spread fear and terror. allow these millions to be disseminated into the What has this neo-Emergency actually hitherto relatively uninfected hinterland. In this resulted in? Without any due process or authority way, the actual policy, as enacted on the ground, of law, it placed every citizen of the country maximises both the economic catastrophe, and under house arrest depriving him/her liberty and the ferocity of the epidemic .... Whence this freedom as enshrined in the Constitution. It brilliant policy, this hybrid of lock-down and herd prevented them from exercising their immunity, which gives us the worst of both constitutional right to ‘livelihood’ thereby options—economic disaster, and a rampaging exposing them to poverty, penury and destitution. epidemic?” It let loose the brutality of ‘police raj’ on every Noam Chomsky, arguably the most citizen treating him/her as ‘criminal’ or part of celebrated thinker of our times, called it ‘unlawful assembly’. By slapping sedition “genocidal” and said, “Indian Prime Minister charges and indulging in arrest for even Narendra Modi gave a four-hour warning before expressing mild opinion about the way a total lockdown. That has affected over a governments are handling the pandemic, it billion people. Some of them have nowhere to spread terror among citizens and journalists. By go… People in the informal economy, which is treating individuals as beasts to be beaten-up a huge number of people, are just cast out. Go and sprayed with chemicals, the State took walk back to your village, which may be a away his/her dignity which is the most precious thousand miles away. Die on the roadside. This possession of a human being. The misery of is a huge catastrophe in the making, right on top millions of migrant workers and the resultant of the strong efforts to impose the ultra-right excruciating exodus, has put India to shame in Hindutva doctrines that are at the core of Modi’s the international arena! thinking and background.” Since it is neo-Emergency there must be Chomsky has said what has to be said. crony-capitalism, and there is plenty even as During Indira’s Emergency period people the country is bleeding from deep multiple cuts. moved in hushed silence, stunned and Privatising electricity; selling-off public sector; traumatised by the harrowing goings on. Bulk enacting harsh labour laws to facilitate of civil services crawled when asked to bend. corporates; handing over protected forests to Higher judiciary bowed to the dust and was carpetbaggers and awarding huge contracts to willing to rule that under Emergency regime, the favourite few. An unaccounted PMCARES citizens did not even have the ‘right to life’. Fund through coerced contributions! And Politicians of all hue and colour, barring Delhi’s Central Vista to build a palatial honourable exceptions, lay supine and prostrate. parliament building and prime minister’s house! As for citizens, an arbitrary and arrogant state This neo-Emergency and its enforcement turned them into mere ‘subjects.’ Things are no have been condemned by genuine experts. different now, and under neo-Emergency, Calling it ‘insane’ Vikram Patel of Harvard’s whatever left of the institutions of democratic School of Public Health said, “Lockdown when governance are being totally annihilated. infection levels are low, but in such a manner Governance by force and fear is the new norm. that produces intensified infection among the No wonder Noam Chomsky calls India an forcibly disrupted millions of informal workers. ‘unliveable country!’ 4 THE RADICAL HUMANIST August 2020 Like during Indira’s Emergency, Union the Delhi Police descend to such despicable Council of Ministers is non-existent. States have levels? been drained-out with hardly any role to play. It all leads to one thing. Though the character Parliament has been totally subdued and had and contents of the current neo-Emergency are passed the Nazi-type Citizenship Amendment different, there is a common thread between Act (CAA) without whimper. When the entire Emergency then and now- Governance by Force country rose in protest, a brutal ‘police raj’ was and Fear. The only difference is that the method let loose even on women and children. Now, adopted then was ‘Jhatka’ and now it is ‘Halal’. under the cover of lockdown, police all over, Effect on freedom and liberty is the same, particularly in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh are busy probably more chilling now! hounding protesters with sedition charges and Emergency 1975 was eyeball-to-eyeball are busy registering FIRs and arresting youth confrontation between Indira Gandhi and JP in and students on flimsiest of grounds. This, while which the former lost. After visiting and touring protecting and shielding Hindutva elements who India during Emergency and meeting Indira have either indulged in or instigated heinous Gandhi, Claire Sterling wrote a piece in New crimes. York Times titled “Ruler of 600 million—and Even a mild-mannered public intellectual like alone.” What she said was poignant, Harsh Mander is not being spared! There are “Somebody once told me, as I was traveling talks that he is being hauled up and may even around India, that the one thing worse than trying be arrested for calling upon youth during anti- to govern the country by democratic persuasion CAA protests to maintain peace and adhere to would be trying to govern it by force. Yet that is “Gandhian Ahimsa.” Yes, in an atmosphere how Mrs. Gandhi is trying to do now.” fouled by hatred, violence and intolerance, peace The ‘Iron Lady’ failed then. Why should it and Ahimsa (non-violence) are indeed crimes! be any different now? As the wise one said: Considering the fact that Harsh Mander had “Those who do not learn from the past have no resigned from IAS in the wake of the 2002 future!” Gujarat ‘genocide’ and was the first person to The writer is a former Army and IAS call it ‘Nazi-type pogrom’, we know where the Officer. The views are personal. anger against him comes from. But pray, should Courtesy News Click, 24 Jun 2020 Articles/Reports for The Radical Humanist Dear Friends, Please mail your articles/reports for publication in the RH to: [email protected] or post them to: G-3/617, Shalimar Garden Extn.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • By Kaveri Sarkar
    PIUNDERGRADUATE SIGMA JOURNAL ALPHA OF POLITICS ELON UNIVERSITY | FALL 2020 | VOL. XX NO. 2 Pi Sigma Alpha Undergraduate Journal of Politics The Pi Sigma Alpha Undergraduate Journal of Politics (ISSN 1556-2034) is published bi- annually by the Sigma Upsilon Chapter of Pi Sigma Alpha, Elon University, Department of Political Science, 100 Campus Drive, Gray Pavilion, 2333 Campus Box, Elon, NC 27244. The Journal is funded by Pi Sigma Alpha, the National Political Science Honor Society, 1527 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20036, http://www.pisigmaalpha.org/ The Pi Sigma Alpha Undergraduate Journal of Politics was founded in the Spring of 2001 by Delta Omega Chapter of Pi Sigma Alpha at Purdue University, under the name The American Undergraduate Journal of Politics and Government. With the sponsorship of Pi Sigma Alpha, the National Political Science Honor Society, the name of the Journal was changed to The Pi Sigma Alpha Undergraduate Journal of Politics as of the Fall 2004 edition. Electronic editions of the Journal are available online at http://www.psajournal.org. For further information, please contact Dr. Laura Roselle at Elon University ([email protected]). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the written permission of the editors and faculty advisors of The Pi Sigma Alpha Undergraduate Journal of Politics. The Pi Sigma Alpha Undergraduate Journal of Politics and content appearing there-in is copyrighted by Pi Sigma Alpha. While holding these rights, Pi Sigma Alpha does not exert editorial or other control over the content of the Journal or the decisions or actions of its staff in the course of normal business operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Compounding Injustice: India
    INDIA 350 Fifth Ave 34 th Floor New York, N.Y. 10118-3299 http://www.hrw.org (212) 290-4700 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) – July 2003 Afsara, a Muslim woman in her forties, clutches a photo of family members killed in the February-March 2002 communal violence in Gujarat. Five of her close family members were murdered, including her daughter. Afsara’s two remaining children survived but suffered serious burn injuries. Afsara filed a complaint with the police but believes that the police released those that she identified, along with many others. Like thousands of others in Gujarat she has little faith in getting justice and has few resources with which to rebuild her life. ©2003 Smita Narula/Human Rights Watch COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO REDRESS MASSACRES IN GUJARAT 1630 Connecticut Ave, N.W., Suite 500 2nd Floor, 2-12 Pentonville Road 15 Rue Van Campenhout Washington, DC 20009 London N1 9HF, UK 1000 Brussels, Belgium TEL (202) 612-4321 TEL: (44 20) 7713 1995 TEL (32 2) 732-2009 FAX (202) 612-4333 FAX: (44 20) 7713 1800 FAX (32 2) 732-0471 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] July 2003 Vol. 15, No. 3 (C) COMPOUNDING INJUSTICE: The Government's Failure to Redress Massacres in Gujarat Table of Contents I. Summary............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Impunity for Attacks Against Muslims...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Early Hindu-Muslim Conflict
    Behind the 2020 Delhi Riots: History of Hindu-Muslim Conflict in India Piper Sereno Advisor: Dr. Laura Leming SOC 334 Research Questions: The 2020 Delhi Riots: • What was the cause of the Delhi riots in - These riots began with peaceful protests 2020, and what happened during them? against the Citizens Amendment Act of 2019, an act that makes it easier for • How did Hindu-Muslim conflict in India foreign born religious minorities except begin, and how has it progressed over Muslims to become citizens (Saaliq 13). time? - On February 23, 2020, a group of Hindus attacked Muslim protesters. • How can religions that teach non- - There were 53 deaths and over 200 violence have such heated conflict? injuries. Similarly to the 2002 riots, a large proportion of the deaths were Muslim (Chitalkar). Early Hindu-Muslim Conflict - Muslims felt unprotected by police forces, and reported that the Prime Minister was not quick to act and did not denounce the Conflict between these two religious violence (Saaliq 13). groups dates back as far as the 18th - The riots included burning shops, century, and has occurred all throughout Why so much conflict? destroying buildings and homes with the following centuries (Kausar 354). There is a relationship between violence and bricks, stabbing and shooting (Saaliq 14). In 2002, a riot occurred when Hindus income in India. Muslims are generally poorer - Many people believe that this was not harassed Muslims on a train, and the than Hindus in India, and disproportionately necessarily a riot, but instead a pogrom, Muslims fought back by setting a fire. 58 suffer death in riots (Mitra).
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Edition
    YEARS # 1 Indian American Weekly : Since 2006 VOL 15 ISSUE 15 ● NEW YORK / DALLAS ● APR 09 - APR 15, 2021 ● ENQUIRIES: 646-247-9458 ● [email protected] www.theindianpanorama.news OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT BIDEN U.S. imposes new sanctions on Russia Attorney Ravi Batra Expels 10 Russian Page 9 diplomats, restricts trading and blacklists 32 individuals India's worries grow as over 'election meddling, Coronavirus cases mount cyberattack' to cross 200,000 on a WASHINGTON (TIP): A reminder of single day the cold war period, the United States announced sanctions against Russia on ● India registered 2,16,642 new Thursday, April 15, and the expulsion of COVID-19 cases as of 11.15 p.m. IST 10 diplomats in retaliation for what on April 15. As many as 1,153 Washington says is the Kremlin's U.S. deaths were also recorded on the election interference, a massive day. cyberattack and other hostile activity. ● Country adds more than 1,100 President Joe Biden ordered a deaths; Maharashtra leads with widening of restrictions on U.S. banks 61,695 cases, followed by U.P. trading in Russian government debt, In a tough and decisive action, President Biden signed an executive order to impose new ● Country has so far reported a total CONTD ON PAGE 7 sanctions on Russia - File photo of 1,42,87,740 cases and 1,74,306 deaths. President Joe Biden greets Indian Americans and Sikhs on Vaisakhi WASHINGTON (TIP): US President Biden and the US first lady were joined Joe Biden led his country in greeting by several lawmakers in greeting Indian- Indian Americans, South Asians and Americans and Sikhs on the occasion of Southeast Asians on the eve of their New Baisakhi.
    [Show full text]
  • The State, Democracy and Social Movements
    The Dynamics of Conflict and Peace in Contemporary South Asia This book engages with the concept, true value, and function of democracy in South Asia against the background of real social conditions for the promotion of peaceful development in the region. In the book, the issue of peaceful social development is defined as the con- ditions under which the maintenance of social order and social development is achieved – not by violent compulsion but through the negotiation of intentions or interests among members of society. The book assesses the issue of peaceful social development and demonstrates that the maintenance of such conditions for long periods is a necessary requirement for the political, economic, and cultural development of a society and state. Chapters argue that, through the post-colo- nial historical trajectory of South Asia, it has become commonly understood that democracy is the better, if not the best, political system and value for that purpose. Additionally, the book claims that, while democratization and the deepening of democracy have been broadly discussed in the region, the peace that democracy is supposed to promote has been in serious danger, especially in the 21st century. A timely survey and re-evaluation of democracy and peaceful development in South Asia, this book will be of interest to academics in the field of South Asian Studies, Peace and Conflict Studies and Asian Politics and Security. Minoru Mio is a professor and the director of the Department of Globalization and Humanities at the National Museum of Ethnology, Japan. He is one of the series editors of the Routledge New Horizons in South Asian Studies and has co-edited Cities in South Asia (with Crispin Bates, 2015), Human and International Security in India (with Crispin Bates and Akio Tanabe, 2015) and Rethinking Social Exclusion in India (with Abhijit Dasgupta, 2017), also pub- lished by Routledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Breathing Life Into the Constitution
    Breathing Life into the Constitution Human Rights Lawyering In India Arvind Narrain | Saumya Uma Alternative Law Forum Bengaluru Breathing Life into the Constitution Human Rights Lawyering In India Arvind Narrain | Saumya Uma Alternative Law Forum Bengaluru Breathing Life into the Constitution Human Rights Lawyering in India Arvind Narrain | Saumya Uma Edition: January 2017 Published by: Alternative Law Forum 122/4 Infantry Road, Bengaluru - 560001. Karnataka, India. Design by: Vinay C About the Authors: Arvind Narrain is a founding member of the Alternative Law Forum in Bangalore, a collective of lawyers who work on a critical practise of law. He has worked on human rights issues including mass crimes, communal conflict, LGBT rights and human rights history. Saumya Uma has 22 years’ experience as a lawyer, law researcher, writer, campaigner, trainer and activist on gender, law and human rights. Cover page images copied from multiple news articles. All copyrights acknowledged. Any part of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted as necessary. The authors only assert the right to be identified wtih the reproduced version. “I am not a religious person but the only sin I believe in is the sin of cynicism.” Parvez Imroz, Jammu and Kashmir Civil Society Coalition (JKCSS), on being told that nothing would change with respect to the human rights situation in Kashmir Dedication This book is dedicated to remembering the courageous work of human rights lawyers, Jalil Andrabi (1954-1996), Shahid Azmi (1977-2010), K. Balagopal (1952-2009), K.G. Kannabiran (1929-2010), Gobinda Mukhoty (1927-1995), T. Purushotham – (killed in 2000), Japa Lakshma Reddy (killed in 1992), P.A.
    [Show full text]
  • MESMP03511 Zaidi S.Pdf (3.250Mb)
    Governing Land: Politics of (Un) Plannability in Muslim Neighbourhoods of Delhi Sabika Zaidi Supervised by, Dr Abidin Kusno A Major Paper submitted to the Faculty of Urban and Environmental Change in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Environmental Studies (Planning Program) York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 21st December 2020 Abstract Delhi is one of the most extensively studied urban areas globally. Yet, academic literature on the question of “informality, as a mode of governance” (Roy 2005) has seldom paid attention to the production of Muslim spaces in the city. Jamil (2017), in her scholarship on Muslim localities in Delhi, introduces a rare perspective on how the urban Muslim is spatially organized within the dominant ideology of urbanization in Delhi. This paper examines the history and politics of (un)plannability to understand the production of Muslim colonies (focusing on Jamia Nagar) in the context of neoliberalization in Delhi and the rise of Hindu nationalism in India. The paper follows the changing body of the state to explain the political rationality of “exclusion” (Agamben 2005, Ong 2006), which does not always follow the logic of neoliberal governmentality. This paper argues that the formation of Muslim neighbourhoods as the ‘enemy within’ is taking place under state powers that pursue anti-Muslim policies on one hand and neoliberal urban expansion on the other. I highlight the conditions of use and exchange of land that facilitate the blurring of boundaries between state and society in Muslim colonies. Here, I pay particular attention to the various ‘democratic’ processes that create informality through large-scale urban land acquisition and regularization of the ‘unauthorized’.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Rana Ayyub's Gujarat Files: Anatomy of a Cover Up
    Feminist Dissent Review of Rana Ayyub’s Gujarat Files: Anatomy of a Cover up Kaveri Sharma* *Correspondence: [email protected] First, a word about Rana Ayyub. She is a journalist who used to work for Indian media outfit called Tehelka. She left Tehelka few years ago when they refused to publish what was essentially the content of Gujarat Files. Not only were her ex-employers not willing to publish the recordings and findings of Rana’s investigative journalism but most publishers declined to print the book, prompting her to self-publish this in April 2016. The book © Copyright: The Authors. This article is turned out to be such a sensation that within six months, a second edition issued under the terms of had to be printed with demand still soaring high. But the interesting aspect the Creative Commons Attribution Non- of this very popular book, which one Indian magazine quoted as ‘one of Commercial Share Alike License, which permits the most important pieces of investigative journalism in Indian history’, is use and redistribution of the work provided that that the launch of the book and its existence as well as reviews have almost the original author and source are credited, the been blanked out by mainstream media (barring a couple of exceptions). work is not used for commercial purposes and This brings us to the explosive subject of this book. Gujarat Files that any derivative works are made available under presents in-depth interviews with those responsible for maintaining law the same license terms. and order in the State of Gujarat during the pogrom of 2002 when about a thousand Muslims were killed.
    [Show full text]
  • Subaltern Experiences of Everyday Urban Violence During COVID-19
    Journal of the British Academy, 9(s3), 139–155 DOI https://doi.org/10.5871/jba/009s3.139 Posted 22 June 2021 Silent cities, silenced histories: subaltern experiences of everyday urban violence during COVID-19 Jaideep Gupte and Syeda Jenifa Zahan Abstract: The public health containment measures in response to COVID-19 have precipitated a significant epistemic and ontological shift in ‘bottom-up’ and ‘action-oriented’ approaches in development studies research. ‘Lockdown’ necessitates physical and social distancing between research subject and researcher, raising legitimate concerns around the extent to which ‘distanced’ action-research can be inclusive and address citizens’ lack of agency. Top-down regimes to control urban spaces through lockdown in India have not stemmed the experience of violence in public spaces: some have dramatically intensified, while others have changed in unexpected ways. Drawing on our experiences of researching the silent histories of violence and memorialisation of past violence in urban India over the past three decades, we argue that the experience of subaltern groups during the pandemic is not an aberration from their sustained experiences of everyday violence predating the pandemic. Exceptionalising the experiences of violence during the pandemic silences past histories and disenfranchises long struggles for rights in the city. At the same time, we argue that research practices employed to interpret the experience of urban violence during lockdown in India need to engage the chang- ing nature of infrastructural regimes, as they seek to control urban spaces, and as subaltern groups continue to mobilise and advocate, in new ways. Keywords: COVID-19, India, cities, urban violence, GBV, subaltern, memorialisation, urban disaster response, informal settlements, urban space.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee on External Affairs (2016-17)
    COMMITTEE 16 ON EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (2016-17) SIXTEENTH LOK SABHA MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS INDO-PAK RELATIONS SIXTEENTH REPORT LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI AUGUST, 2017/Shravana, 1939 (Saka) SIXTEENTH REPORT COMMITTEE ON EXTERNAL AFFAIRS (2016-17) (SIXTEENTH LOK SABHA) MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS INDO-PAK RELATIONS Presented to Lok Sabha on 11 August, 2017 Laid in Rajya Sabha on 11 August, 2017 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI August, 2017/Shravana, 1939 (Saka) COEA NO. 129 Price : Rs. ................ © 2017 by Lok Sabha Secretariat Published under Rule 382 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha (__________Edition) and Printed by CONTENTS COMPOSITION OF THE COMMITTEE (2016-17) INTRODUCTION Chapter 1: Introductory 1-2 Chapter 2: Indo-Pak Relations: An Overview- 3-22 I. Historical Background II. Dialogue Process III. Approach and policy towards Pakistan Chapter 3 : Strategic Dimension of the Relationship 23-64 I. Border Management and Security II. Subversive Activities by Pakistan and Cross Border Terrorism III. The Issue of Jammu & Kashmir IV. Nuclear & Missile Programme V. Recent Surgical Strikes Chapter 4: Economic & Cultural Aspects 65-81 I. Economic Engagement/Cooperation II. Cultural Aspect Chapter 5: Reaction/Role of Global Actors and Institutions 82-93 Chapter 6: Miscellaneous 94-103 I. Sharing of Water II. Humanitarian Exchanges III. TAPI Chapter 7: Roadmap For Future 104-109 I. Impediments to Normalization of ties II. Roadmap for Future Appendices I. Minutes of the Second Sitting of the Committee (2016-17) held on 18.10.2016 110-112 II. Minutes of the Sixth Sitting of the Committee (2016-17) held on 12.1.2017 113-115 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Hindu Handwritten Notes 18/06/21
    Handwritten Notes 18-JUNE-21 Instagram- makeme_ias For Downloading Daily Hindu Analysis- Visit @ Website- www.makemeias.com Follow us @ Instagram- makeme_ias Contents SNo. Topics Analysis Pg. - court 's student freed as police Gs -3 rejects Internal 1. stand security 1 A to a draconian judicial pushback Legal as -3 IR 2. 6 Regime as -2 Polity " " "" " "" " " """" " " 3. " science $ tech India's Health sector as -2 Healthcare Should India Accept Islamic state Gsg 4. Returnees . takes more than Reforms as -3 5. Recovery 7 Economy Rules cable Tv Network as -2 6. 8 am mendedRegulating polity as -2 7. { !intervention centres " centdtme① Contents SNo. Topics Analysis Pg. Birth Death up in 2019 as-1 8. Registrations 10 Demography we must use the available vaccines 652 10 9. to the most vulnerable protect . Gov policy CII F-3 - lakh stimulus 953 10. urges % 11. 12. 13. µ14. Background: The Delhi High Court granted bail to three students of Jawaharlal Nehru University and Jamia Millia Islamia arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in connection with the northeast Delhi riots in 2020. Details: • A Delhi court has issued the release warrant for the student activists. • The High Court also ruled that no offence under the UAPA was made out against any of the three students. • The Delhi Police have moved the Supreme Court challenging the High Court verdict granting regular bail to the three students. Details: • The court criticised the Delhi Police for casually invoking provisions of UAPA against the three accused noting that the line between the constitutionally guaranteed “right to protest” and “terrorist activity” had been blurred.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death Penalty
    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA Report No.262 The Death Penalty August 2015 U;k;ewfrZ vftr izdk'k 'kgk Justice Ajit Prakash Shah HkwriwoZ eq[; U;k;k/kh'k] fnYyh mPp U;k;ky; Former Chief Justice of Delhi High court v/;{k Chairman Hkkjr dk fof/k vk;ksx Law Commission of India Hkkjr ljdkj Government of India 14ok¡ ry] fgUnqLrku VkbZEl gkÅl] 14th Floor, Hindustan Times House dLrwjck xk¡/kh ekxZ Kasturba Gandhi Marg ubZ fnYyh&110 001 New Delhi – 110 001 D.O. No.6(3)263/2014-LC(LS) 31 August 2015 Dear Mr. Sadananda Gowda ji, The Law Commission of India received a reference from the Supreme Court in Santosh Kumar Satishbhushan Bariyar v. Maharashtra [(2009) 6 SCC 498] and Shankar Kisanrao Khade v. Maharashtra [(2013) 5 SCC 546], to study the issue of the death penalty in India to “allow for an up-to-date and informed discussion and debate on the subject.” This is not the first time that the Commission has been asked to look into the death penalty – the 35th Report (“Capital Punishment”, 1967), notably, is a key report in this regard. That Report recommended the retention of the death penalty in India. The Supreme Court has also, in Bachan Singh v. UOI [AIR 1980 SC 898], upheld the constitutionality of the death penalty, but confined its application to the ‘rarest of rare cases’, to reduce the arbitrariness of the penalty. However, the social, economic and cultural contexts of the country have changed drastically since the 35th report.
    [Show full text]