Resources.Pdf
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Massachusetts Marine Artificial Reef Plan
Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Fisheries Policy Report FP – 3 Massachusetts Marine Artificial Reef Plan M. A. Rousseau Massachusetts Division of MarineFisheries Department of Fish and Game Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Commonwealth of Massachusetts June 2008 Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries Fisheries Policy Report FP - 3 Massachusetts Marine Artificial Reef Plan Mark Rousseau Massachusetts Division of Marine Fisheries 251 Causeway Street, Suite 400 Boston, MA 02114 June 2008 Massachusetts Division of MarineFisheries Paul J. Diodati - Director Department of Fish and Game Mary B. Griffin - Commissioner Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Ian A. Bowles - Secretary Commonwealth of Massachusetts Deval L. Patrick – Governor Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................iv I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................1 1.1 PURPOSE OF MA ARTIFICIAL REEF PLAN ............................................................................................................2 1.2 DEFINITION OF AN ARTIFICIAL REEF....................................................................................................................2 1.3 BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTIVITY AND AGGREGATION................................................................................................3 -
Mnemonics Layout
NON- ESSENTIAL MNEMONICS AN UNNECESSARY JOURNEY INTO SENSELESS KNOWLEDGE KENT WOODYARD ILLUSTRATIONS BY MARK DOWNEY NON- ESSENTIAL MNEMONICS AN UNNECESSARY JOURNEY INTO SENSELESS KNOWLEDGE KENT WOODYARD ILLUSTRATIONS BY MARK DOWNEY Copyright © 2014 by Kent Woodyard Illustrations © 2014 by Mark Downey All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Published by Prospect Park Books www.prospectparkbooks.com Distributed by Consortium Books Sales & Distribution www.cbsd.com Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data is on le with the Library of Congress. The following is for reference only: Woodyard, Kent Non-essential mnemonics: an unnecessary journey into senseless knowledge / by Kent Woodyard — 1st ed. ISBN: 978-1-938849-29-9 1. American wit and humor. 2. Mnemonic devices. I. Title. Design & layout by Renee Nakagawa To my friends. You know who you are. Disclaimer This is a work of ction. The data sets included are true and (predominantly) accurate, but all other elements of the book are utter nonsense and should be regarded as such. At no point was “research” or anything approaching an academic process employed during the writing of the mnemonic descriptions or prose portions of this book. Any quotations, historical descriptions, or autobiographical details bearing any resemblance to realities in the world around -
MASSACHUSETTS V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Michael Sugar* Warmer Now Than It Was Centuries Or Even Decades Ago.' Sea Level
MASSACHUSETTS V. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Michael Sugar* I. INTRODUCTION The effects of global warming are already being felt. The world is much warmer now than it was centuries or even decades ago.' Sea levels have risen more than ten to twenty centimeters over the past century and moun- tain glaciers are retreating.2 Climate change is occurring. However, United States regulation of the greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions that contribute to it has not taken place. Instead, in 2003 the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") declined to regulate these emissions because they were beyond their statutory authority under the Clean Air Act ("CAA"), sug- gesting that voluntary action and continued study were the best way to ad- dress this potentially catastrophic issue.' After the EPA denied their petition for rulemaking, Massachusetts and other plaintiffs filed suit to compel the agency to reconsider its denial. The Supreme Court granted certiorari4 and decided Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency on April 2, 2007.1 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioners after thoroughly analyzing the scope of the CAA and the EPA's discretion to decline rulemaking. The Court's reliance on Massachusetts' status as a state in order to determine standing makes the effect of this decision uncertain. II. BACKGROUND In the early twentieth century, the states played a significant role in regulating interstate air pollution through public nuisance suits. 6 Public nui- sance suits are predicated on the idea that sovereign entities have the right to sue on behalf of their citizens when the actions of a defendant affect the sovereign interests of the state.7 As a sovereign entity, a state has an interest "in all the earth and air within its domain. -
Chicago Wilderness Region Urban Forest Vulnerability Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture CHICAGO WILDERNESS REGION URBAN FOREST VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND SYNTHESIS: A Report from the Urban Forestry Climate Change Response Framework Chicago Wilderness Pilot Project Forest Service Northern Research Station General Technical Report NRS-168 April 2017 ABSTRACT The urban forest of the Chicago Wilderness region, a 7-million-acre area covering portions of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin, will face direct and indirect impacts from a changing climate over the 21st century. This assessment evaluates the vulnerability of urban trees and natural and developed landscapes within the Chicago Wilderness region to a range of future climates. We synthesized and summarized information on the contemporary landscape, provided information on past climate trends, and illustrated a range of projected future climates. We used this information to inform models of habitat suitability for trees native to the area. Projected shifts in plant hardiness and heat zones were used to understand how nonnative species and cultivars may tolerate future conditions. We also assessed the adaptability of planted and naturally occurring trees to stressors that may not be accounted for in habitat suitability models such as drought, flooding, wind damage, and air pollution. The summary of the contemporary landscape identifies major stressors currently threatening the urban forest of the Chicago Wilderness region. Major current threats to the region’s urban forest include invasive species, pests and disease, land-use change, development, and fragmentation. Observed trends in climate over the historical record from 1901 through 2011 show a temperature increase of 1 °F in the Chicago Wilderness region. Precipitation increased as well, especially during the summer. -
Dwhu 4Xdolw\ $Vvhvvphqw Ri Wkh
1$7,21$/:$7(548$/,7<$66(660(17352*5$0 :DWHU4XDOLW\$VVHVVPHQWRIWKH1HZ(QJODQG &RDVWDO%DVLQVLQ0DLQH0DVVDFKXVHWWV 1HZ+DPSVKLUHDQG5KRGH,VODQG (QYLURQPHQWDO6HWWLQJVDQG,PSOLFDWLRQVIRU :DWHU4XDOLW\DQG$TXDWLF%LRWD :DWHU5HVRXUFHV,QYHVWLJDWLRQV5HSRUW 86'HSDUWPHQWRIWKH,QWHULRU 86*HRORJLFDO6XUYH\ Cover photograph is a panoramic view of the Merrimack River and the Amoskeag Mills in Manchester, New Hampshire, looking south from the west side of the river, circa 1883. Photograph is courtesy of the Manchester (N.H.) Historic Association. 86'HSDUWPHQWRIWKH,QWHULRU 86*HRORJLFDO6XUYH\ 1$7,21$/:$7(548$/,7<$66(660(17352*5$0 :DWHU4XDOLW\$VVHVVPHQWRIWKH 1HZ(QJODQG&RDVWDO%DVLQVLQ0DLQH 0DVVDFKXVHWWV1HZ+DPSVKLUHDQG 5KRGH,VODQG(QYLURQPHQWDO6HWWLQJVDQG ,PSOLFDWLRQVIRU:DWHU4XDOLW\DQG $TXDWLF%LRWD %\6DUDK0)ODQDJDQ0DUWKD*1LHOVHQ.HLWK:5RELQVRQDQG -DPHV)&ROHV :DWHU5HVRXUFHV,QYHVWLJDWLRQV5HSRUW 3HPEURNH1HZ+DPSVKLUH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services New Hampshire/Vermont District Box 25286 361 Commerce Way Denver, CO 80225 Pembroke, NH 03275-3718 Information regarding the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program is available on the Internet via the World Wide Web. You may connect to the NAWQA Home Page using the Universal Resources Locator (URL) at <http://wwwrvares.er.usgs.gov/nawqa/nawqa_home.html> FOREWORD The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey • Describe how water quality is changing over (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the time. -
Changing Landscapes in the Chicago Wilderness Region: a Climate Change Update to the Biodiversity Recovery Plan
Changing Landscapes in the Chicago Wilderness Region: A Climate Change Update to the Biodiversity Recovery Plan Version 1.0* April 2012 Prepared by the Chicago Wilderness Climate Change Task Force * This plan is the first iteration needed to create momentum for climate action for nature in the Chicago Wilderness region. Climate change science, policy responses, and funding are changing rapidly. This is considered a living plan that will remain flexible in the face of evolving circumstances. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections Section 1: Introduction……………………………………………………………………....3 Section 2: Climate Change and Terrestrial Communities………………………………......16 Section 3: Climate Change and Aquatic Communities………………………………….....32 Section 4: Climate Change and Green Infrastructure……………………………………...46 References.............................................................................................................................51 Figures and Tables Figure 1.1: Map of Chicago Wilderness…………………………………………………...59 Figure 1.2: Similarities and Differences between CCAP and CAPN……………………...60 Box 1: Past Climate Changes and Projected Future Trends in CW Climate System….......61 Table 1.2: Climate Change Impacts to Taxonomic Groups………………………………... Figure 2.1: Climate Change as a Threat Amplifier………………………………………63 Table 2.1: Broad Brush Matrix Table of Communities X Climate Change Impacts X. Existing Threats…………………………………………………………………..........….64 Table 2.2: Detailed Table of CW Terrestrial Community Type and Climate Change Impacts ……………………………………………………………………………. -
2020 Natural Resources Inventory
2020 NATURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY TOWNSHIP OF MONTGOMERY SOMERSET COUNTY, NEW JERSEY Prepared By: Tara Kenyon, AICP/PP Principal NJ License #33L100631400 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 5 AGRICULTURE ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRY IN AND AROUND MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP ...................................................... 7 REGULATIONS AND PROGRAMS RELATED TO AGRICULTURE ...................................................................... 11 HEALTH IMPACTS OF AGRICULTURAL AVAILABILITY AND LOSS TO HUMANS, PLANTS AND ANIMALS .... 14 HOW IS MONTGOMERY TOWNSHIP WORKING TO SUSTAIN AND ENHANCE AGRICULTURE? ................... 16 RECOMMENDATIONS AND POTENTIAL PROJECTS .......................................................................................... 18 CITATIONS ............................................................................................................................................................. 19 AIR QUALITY .............................................................................................................................................................. 21 CHARACTERISTICS OF AIR .................................................................................................................................. 21 -
What Is and Is Not Known About Climate Change in Illinois: the Scientific Perspective
What Is and Is Not Known about Climate Change in Illinois: The Scientific Perspective Stanley A. Changnon and Wayne M. Wendland Illinois State Water Survey Champaign, Illinois May 1994 Miscellaneous Publication 156 WHAT IS AND IS NOT KNOWN ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE IN ILLINOIS: THE SCIENTIFIC PERSPECTIVE Stanley A. Changnon and Wayne M. Wendland TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Human Effects on Weather and Climate 3 The Illinois Climate 7 Factors Affecting the Climate of Illinois................................................................... 7 Historical Shifts in the Climate of Illinois.................................................................... 7 The Greenhouse Effect 9 Greenhouse Effect Essential to Life on Earth 9 Alterations to the Greenhouse Effect and Climate Implications 10 General Circulation Models 14 The Models 14 The Scientific Debate over GCM Predictions of Global Warming.................................. 15 Policy Statement, American Meteorological Society 16 Future Climate Scenarios 19 Climate Scenarios from GCMs 20 Climate Scenarios from Analogs 23 Potential Effects of Global Warming in Illinois..................................................................... 25 Water Resources 25 Effects on Agriculture in Illinois 29 Other Potential Physical Effects and Socioeconomic Impacts of Climate Change in Illinois........................................................................... 33 Studies of Adjustment and Adaptation to Climate Change....................................................... 35 Detecting Climate -
Curriculum Vitae June 2017
Curriculum Vitae June 2017 DAVID A. ROBINSON Department of Geography Phone: 848-445-4741 Office of the NJ State Climatologist Fax: 732-445-0006 Rutgers University Email: [email protected] 54 Joyce Kilmer Avenue Website (research): snowcover.org Piscataway, NJ 08854 Website (state climate): njclimate.org Contents Education ....................................................................................................................................1 Academic Appointments ..............................................................................................................1 Administrative Appointments .......................................................................................................2 Awards and Honors .....................................................................................................................2 Grants and Contracts ...................................................................................................................3 Publications .................................................................................................................................9 Professional Presentations ......................................................................................................... 49 Professional Activities ............................................................................................................... 67 Mentoring ................................................................................................................................ -
Minnesota Weathertalk Newsletter for Friday, January 1, 2010
Minnesota WeatherTalk Newsletter for Friday, January 1, 2010 To: MPR Morning Edition Crew From: Mark Seeley, University of Minnesota Extension Dept of Soil, Water, and Climate Subject: Minnesota WeatherTalk Newsletter for Friday, January 1, 2010 Headlines: -Preliminary climate summary for December 2009 -Weekly Weather Potpourri -MPR listener question -Almanac for January 1st -Past weather features -Auld Lang Syne -Outlook Topic: Preliminary Climate Summary for December 2009 Mean December temperatures were generally 1 to 2 degrees F cooler than normal for most observers in the state. Extremes for the month ranged from 52 degrees F at Marshall on December 1st to -23 degrees F at Orr on the 12th. Minnesota reported the coldest temperature in the 48 contiguous states on five days during the month. Nearly all observers in the state reported above normal December precipitation, mostly thanks to the winter storms and blizzards on the 8th and 9th and again on the 24th and 25th. Many communities reported three to four times normal December precipitation. Winnebago with 3.05 inches recorded the 2nd wettest December in history, while Lamberton with 3.76 inches also reported their 2nd wettest December in history. Browns Valley in Traverse County reported their wettest December in history with 1.98 inches. Snowfall amounts were well above normal as well. Many climate observers reported over 20 inches. Worthington reported a record amount of snow for December with 34.6 inches, while Fairmont and Lamberton also reported a new record monthly total with 36.3 inches. The blizzard on December 8-9 closed highways and schools in many southeastern communities with winds gusting to 45-50 mph. -
Missouri Smart Agriculture: Exploring a Path for Agricultural Resiliency in Missouri a Solutions from the Land Facilitated Dialogue
PHOTOS: CHARLIE RAHM OF THE MISSOURI USDA NRCS OFFICE. Work Group Missouri SmartAgriculture October 2018 Facilitated Dialogue A SolutionsfromtheLand Missouri Resiliency in for Agricultural Exploring aPath Agriculture: Missouri Smart MISSOuRI SMART AGRICulTuRE: ExPlORInG A PATH fOR AGRICulTuRAl RESIlIEnCy In MISSOuRI* TOC: October 2018 As the nation’s - and Missouri’s - agriculture and forestry sectors prepare Missouri Agriculture and to meet the food and fiber demands of a global population expected to Climate Trends .....................................2 approach or exceed 10 billion people in 2050, crop, livestock and forestry Pathways to Enhanced Resiliency ......3 producers will face numerous challenges. These challenges will include, among others, global market structures, changing consumer preferences and Changing Conditions ............................3 regulatory uncertainty. Many of these challenges will be exacerbated by the Soil Health – A Solution for impacts of shifting markets, extreme weather events and changing climatic Agriculture (and the Climate) ............5 conditions. Earlier this year, a collaboration of producer-leaders from Missouri’s Additional Insights ................................5 agriculture and forestry sectors, along with business, academic, research and Consumer Expectations ......................6 government partners, were invited to come together as the Missouri Smart Agriculture Work Group. The Work Group’s mission was to assess the Soil Solutions .........................................7 challenges -
Enso and Pdo Climate Variability Impacts on Regional
ENSO AND PDO CLIMATE VARIABILITY IMPACTS ON REGIONAL MISSOURI CROP YIELDS A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by CHASITY B. HENSON Dr. Patrick Market, Thesis Advisor MAY 2016 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled ENSO AND PDO CLIMATE VARIABILITY IMPACTS ON REGIONAL MISSOURI CROP YIELDS presented by Chasity B. Henson, a candidate for the degree of master of science, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. ________________________________________________ Professor Patrick Market ________________________________________________ Professor Anthony Lupo ________________________________________________ Professor Mark Palmer ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My deepest gratitude is expressed to Dr. Patrick Market for being my advisor and motivator. I would also like to thank Dr. Anthony Lupo for being my co-advisor and for his help with the methodologies used in this study. Dr. Patrick Guinan also deserves a thank you for his contributions to this research. I recognize my thesis committee members, especially Dr. Mark Palmer, for taking the time to assess my performance as a graduate student. Suggestions and explanations from all four of these professors have greatly improved my education and the quality of this thesis. Lastly, I acknowledge Ryan Difani, my fellow graduate student, for his support and advice, specifically on the creation of Fig. 5.1. This work would not have been possible without support from Missouri EPSCoR (Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research). Being a chapter of the National Science Foundation, the official disclaimer is as follows: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award IIA-1355406.