DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes of Evidence, Education and Skills Committee: UK Euniversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minutes of Evidence, Education and Skills Committee: UK Euniversity UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 755-iii House of COMMONS MINUTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE EDUCATION AND SKILLS COMMITTEE UK eUNIVERSITY Monday 8 November 2004 DR KIM HOWELLS MP Evidence heard in Public Questions 347 - 479 USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is an uncorrected transcript of evidence taken in public and reported to the House. The transcript has been placed on the internet on the authority of the Committee, and copies have been made available by the Vote Office for the use of Members and others. 2. Any public use of, or reference to, the contents should make clear that neither witnesses nor Members have had the opportunity to correct the record. The transcript is not yet an approved formal record of these proceedings. 3. Members who receive this for the purpose of correcting questions addressed by them to witnesses are asked to send corrections to the Committee Assistant. 4. Prospective witnesses may receive this in preparation for any written or oral evidence they may in due course give to the Committee. 1 1 February 2005 From www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmeduski/uc755-iii/uc75502.htm Oral Evidence Taken before the Education and Skills Committee on Monday 8 November 2004 Members present Mr Barry Sheerman, in the Chair Mr David Chaytor Valerie Davey Jeff Ennis Paul Holmes Mr Robert Jackson Helen Jones Jonathan Shaw Mr Andrew Turner ________________ Witnesses: Dr Kim Howells, a Member of the House, Minister of State for Lifelong Learning, Further and Higher Education, Department for Education and Skills, examined. Q347 Chairman: Good afternoon, Dr Howells. It is very nice to have you here for your first appearance before the Committee, since I have chaired it anyway. There was some speculation that this is in fact a cruel irony in that normally we are asking questions of ministers and they say, "It happened before my time, Chairman", but we have a case here where you were in the department previously. So, perhaps we can find a time when some of the questions we want to ask about are in your previous incarnation. As this is your first meeting with the Committee and we want to start off on a good basis, would you like ten minutes on some general questions before we get on to the eUniversity just to limber you up? Dr Howells: I would be delighted. Q348 Chairman: When we were doing a recent inquiry into the Transport Bill, we were enthused in our report at children arriving at school aerobically excited! 2 1 February 2005 From www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmeduski/uc755-iii/uc75502.htm Dr Howells: That was me! That was my initiative! Q349 Chairman: First of all, anyone who reads the newspapers this morning will be concerned that the Committee has been hearing, certainly as individual members, about the problems with the student loans coming through to students and the problems with computers and so on. Although we see you quoted in various newspapers this morning, could you give us an update on just how serious this situation is and how many students are in danger of going without food and shelter. Dr Howells: None is the answer to that latter point. I asked for the latest figures and I received them about 15 minutes ago, so would you like me to give them to you? Q350 Chairman: We would very much like them, yes Dr Howells: We had 817,882 applications received and registered by LEAs and, of those, 738,219 were approved and finalised within the LEAs. That, according to the mathematics here, leaves 79,663 of which 13,828 have been refused or cancelled because they were not eligible. So, the number left was 65,835 and those essentially are the ones that are still awaiting payment or notification. Of that 65,835, 12,193 are students who did not provide the information which LEAs were requiring, so that information has gone back to them. Basically, outstanding are about 53,000 cases and all of those, as far as I know and I cannot give that as an unequivocal answer, are ones received after the July deadline when the information went out. As I am sure you know, there will be people who would have applied for these loans even a few weeks ago when they finally discovered that they had admission to a university but it is still, as far as I am concerned, a very serious number and we are working very hard to try to get it down. Q351 Chairman: The Times this morning said that terms started three months ago and, even by my calculation, that seems an exaggeration, but nothing should get in the way of a good story! Dr Howells: I think generally it is about seven weeks ago. Q352 Chairman: An old interest of this Committee was that we made a recommendation in our first report on student finance that we were interested in students paying a proper rate of return on the money they borrowed because we thought, as that was such a great deal of money, that we could in fact use that money, a considerable amount of money, to provide grants for poorer students. The Government rejected that proposal but at the same time did some quite sophisticated modelling, as I understand, of those sums. There were other suggestions recently that have been coming from Her Majesty's Opposition, for example, in terms of a similar proposal. Can the Committee see any costings that you might have of any proposals that you have received? Dr Howells: I would be perfectly prepared to share the modelling with you. My prints are not on this set of models but, when I was the minister who was charged with taking the first Tuition Fees Bill through Parliament - and I still have the scars to prove it - then we 3 1 February 2005 From www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmeduski/uc755-iii/uc75502.htm did a lot of modelling at that time and we were very worried that real rates of interest would be very regressive in the sense that if women took time off to have a family, they would find that that interest was making that overall loan figure bigger and bigger and bigger and we were very worried that that would result in those who earned the least having the biggest bill to pay at the end of it and I do not see that that is really any different now Q353 Chairman: The Committee, in its original report, suggested that it should not be a commercial rate of interest, it should be a small rate of interest that could be charged only to those people who were from higher income backgrounds and that could be used as a subsidy, as I said, for poor students. As I understand it, at the time, that was modelled as well, long after your time in the department Dr Howells: I remember us looking at a very similar model at the time but I know it has been looked at since and it has certainly been looked at in terms of the Higher Education Bill this last time around. Q354 Chairman: Would you share those figures with the Committee if they exist? Dr Howells: Yes, of course I will Q355 Mr Jackson: I think we all know from the debate we had a couple of weeks ago that the Minister appreciates very, very much personally the extreme political sensitivity of this whole question about university admissions and the operations of OFFA and so forth and he knows how this interacts with the media, how it gets certain vice- chancellors, quite legitimately, very excited and perhaps above all how it can actually seep into the schools and have demoralising and depressing consequences for all sorts of very bright young people. I know that the Minister is very sensitive to this but I do have the perception that the bureaucracy with which he is associated in one form or another does not have that sensitivity. So, I want to ask the Minister two questions about that in the hope that he will say something which will be communicated to those bits of the bureaucracy. First of all, I would like to ask the Minister what he has done to follow up his response to my intervention on his speech last week/ten days ago about HEFCE moving the goalposts by incorporating GMVQs and ASs in the so-called benchmarks. He told me that he had not been consulted about this/was not aware of it until it happened. What has he done about the situation? Dr Howells: I certainly answered the right honourable gentlemen on this matter during the course of the debate and what I told him was that I wanted to talk with HEFCE and with HESA - I am just getting on top of these acronyms and abbreviations now - to ask them why these figures suddenly seem to be so out of sync with certainly what I had been expecting and it seemed what the universities had been expecting. I had a very interesting answer to this. We are certainly going to discuss it and we are going to look at the nature of the figures and what kinds of things are being measured and what should count and should not count. I do not know about you, Mr Jackson, but the extraordinary thing I found is that HESA is owned by the universities, it is of the universities, the figures are 4 1 February 2005 From www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmeduski/uc755-iii/uc75502.htm produced by the universities, albeit with HEFCE chairing the organisation, and I understand that they were fully consulted on these figures, so they should not have come as a surprise.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Impact of Economic Sanctions
    HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on Economic Affairs 2nd Report of Session 2006–07 The Impact of Economic Sanctions Volume II: Evidence Ordered to be printed 24 April 2007 and published 9 May 2007 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £price HL Paper 96-II CONTENTS Oral Evidence Foreign and Commonwealth Office Written evidence 1 Oral evidence 27 June 2006 12 Dr Kern Alexander, University of Cambridge Written evidence 24 Oral evidence 4 July 2006 30 Mr Alex Singleton, Globalisation Institute Oral evidence 11 July 2006 39 Mr Carne Ross, Independent Diplomat Written evidence 43 Oral evidence 11 July 2006 47 Mr Alex Yearsley, Global Witness Oral evidence 18 July 2006 57 Mr John Hilary, War on Want Oral evidence 18 July 2006 65 Confederation of British Industry (CBI) Written evidence 70 Oral evidence 10 October 2006 75 Supplementary written evidence 79 Mr Joakim Kreutz Oral evidence 10 October 2006 80 European Commission Written evidence 85 Oral evidence 17 October 2006 91 The Lord Renwick of Clifton Oral evidence 17 October 2006 97 Dr Kim Howells MP, Minister of State, and officials, Foreign and Commonwealth Office Oral evidence 24 October 2006 101 Mr Alex Vines, Royal Institute of International Affairs Written evidence 107 Oral evidence 24 October 2006 109 Written Evidence British Bankers’ Association 114 British Exporters Association 116 Ms Rachel Barnes 117 Mr Jeremy P Carver 129 Council for Arab-British Understanding 133 Professor Margaret Doxey 138 European Banking Federation 142 Mr Mikael Eriksson 142 HSBC Holdings 147 Professor Peter Fitzgerald 149 Professor Michael P Malloy 158 Dr Colin Rowat 163 Mr H C von Sponeck 168 Mr Derek Tonkin CMG 170 United Nations Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs 175 Voices for Burma 176 NOTE: The Report of the Committee is published in Volume I, HL Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Dangerous Ambivalence: UK Policy on Torture Since 9/11
    November 2006 Number 1 Dangerous Ambivalence: UK Policy on Torture since 9/11 Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 Lessons from History ...............................................................................................3 A New Ambivalence toward Torture ......................................................................... 6 Torture as Response to Terrorism ........................................................................7 Human rights and security: the false dichotomy.............................................7 Policing and prosecution as a means of confronting terror ............................ 9 The cost of abandoning the rules................................................................. 12 Undermining the Torture Ban ................................................................................. 14 Torture Evidence in Legal Proceedings:.............................................................. 14 Sending People back to the Risk of Torture........................................................16 The British way ............................................................................................ 21 No safeguard against torture .......................................................................24 Trying to Rewrite the Rules on Deportation to Torture.........................................27 Complicity in U.S. Abduction and Torture: British Refusal to Ask Questions ......30 Complicity in Illegal Transfers............................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence and Security Committee Annual Report 2009-2010
    Intelligence and Security Committee Annual Report 2009–2010 Chairman: The Rt. Hon. Dr Kim Howells, MP Intelligence and Security Committee Annual Report 2009–2010 Chairman: The Rt. Hon. Dr Kim Howells, MP Intelligence Services Act 1994 Chapter 13 Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty March 2010 Cm 7844 £14.35 © Crown copyright 2010 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please contact the Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected]. ISBN: 9780101784429 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2354911 03/10 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. From: The Chairman, The Rt. Hon. Dr Kim Howells, MP INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE 35 Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3BQ ISC 2009/10/078 05 March 2010 Rt. Hon. Gordon Brown, MP Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA I enclose the Intelligence and Security Committee’s Annual Report for 2009–2010. This covers our work between August 2009 and March 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • OVERSEAS TRAVEL by MINISTERS 1 April 2007 – 31 March 2008
    OVERSEAS TRAVEL BY MINISTERS 1 April 2007 – 31 March 2008 CABINET OFFICE JULY 2008 OVERSEAS TRAVEL BY MINISTERS 2007 – 2008 INDEX Page Attorney General’s Office 1 Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform 2 Cabinet Office 7 Minister for the Olympics and London 8 Chief Whip (Commons) 9 Chief Whip (Lords) 10 Department for Children, Schools and Families 11 Department for Communities and Local Government 13 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 14 Ministry of Defence 16 Deputy Prime Minister’s Office 19 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 20 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 24 Department of Health 33 Home Office 34 Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills 37 Department for International Development 38 Ministry of Justice 42 Lord Privy Seal and Leader of the House of Commons 44 Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Lords 45 Northern Ireland Office 46 Prime Minister’s Office 47 Scotland Office 49 Department for Transport 50 HM Treasury 52 Wales Office 54 Department for Work and Pensions 55 OVERSEAS TRAVEL BY MINISTERS 2007 – 2008 ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFFICE Dates Minister Destination Purpose of Trip Scheduled, ‘No No. of Officials Total cost 32 (The Royal) Accompanying including travel Squadron’, or Minister, where & ‘Other RAF’ or non scheduled accommodation ‘Charter’ travel used Attorney General 18 - 19 April Rt Hon Lord Luxembourg Justice and Home Affairs Council Scheduled £676 2007 Goldsmith QC 25 May Rt Hon Lord Munich, Meetings with G8 Justice and Interior Ministers Other RAF
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded At: Surveillance-DATAPSST-DCSS-Nov2015.Pdf
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Lashmar, P. ORCID: 0000-0001-9049-3985 (2018). From silence to primary definer: The rise of the Intelligence lobby in the public sphere. Critical Sociology, doi: 10.1177/0896920518780987 This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/20272/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0896920518780987 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] From silence to primary definer: The emergence of an Intelligence lobby in the public sphere. Abstract Until the end of the Cold War the UK intelligence services were not officially acknowledged, and their personnel were banned from entering the public sphere. From 1989 the UK government began to put the intelligence services on a legal footing and release the identity of the heads of the intelligence agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Rethinking US Policy Towards Iran’s Nuclear Programme Surulola James Eke Western support for Iran’s nuclear programme gave way to opposition when it was realised that alongside non-military use, the Islamic Re- public was pursuing a nuclear weapons programme. Driven by Tehran’s policy of aggression in the Middle East and elsewhere, Western states under us coordination intensified the pressure on Iran to abandon its alleged nuclear weapons programme. Rather than halting uranium enrichment in Iran, however, years of stifling economic, scientific and military sanctions have only caused the country to take a more clan- destine approach. Though us-led restrictions have slowed down the pace of Iranian nuclear development, they have been unable to make Tehran come clean about its plans. While maintaining the correctness of the us position on Iran’s nuclear ambitions, this work argues that the policy of restrictions must be reshaped in order to limit its effect on ordinary Iranians. These citizens are identified as potential drivers of change. Seeking their support is crucial for the success of global efforts to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons – hence, the need to restructure restrictions. Keywords: Iran, nuclear weapons, United States, policy, sanctions, restrictions Introduction The nature of nuclear activities in Iran suggests that the country is on a path to nuclear weapons production. In heading there, it has taken Scan this article onto your two routes: highly enriched uranium (heu) and plutonium production. mobile device Despite the denials of Iranian government ofcials, components of the 38 state’s programme and the secrecy of its nuclear dealings bolster the claims of world powers that there is a military dimension to the Islamic Republic’s uranium enrichment plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Trident: the Deal Isn't Done
    Trident: The Deal Isn’t Done Serious Questions Remain Unanswered Dr. Nick Ritchie Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Department of Peace Studies : University of Bradford : December 2007 About this briefing This briefing paper is the first in a series to published through 2007 and 2008 as part of the Bradford Disarmament Research Centre’s programme on “Nuclear-armed Britain: A Critical Examination of Trident Modernisation, Implications and Accountability”. The programme has been generously funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. To find out more please visit www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/trident.html. About the author Nick Ritchie is a Post-Doctoral Research Fellow at the Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford. He is lead researcher on the “Nuclear-armed Britain” programme. He previously worked for six years as a researcher at the Oxford Research Group on global security issues, in particular nuclear proliferation, arms control and disarmament. His PhD thesis examined the evolution of US nuclear weapons policy from 1990-2004. Recent publications include The Political Road to War with Iraq with Paul Rogers (Routledge, 2007), Replacing Trident: Britain, America and Nuclear Weapons, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 28 No. 2 (August 2007), and Replacing Trident: Who Will Make the Decisions and How? (Oxford Research Group report, August 2006). Acknowledgments The author would like to thank the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, Paul Rogers, Malcolm Dando and Simon Whitby for their support and comments. The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Peace Studies or the University of Bradford.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision-Making in Defence Policy
    House of Commons Defence Committee Decision-making in Defence Policy Eleventh Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 March 2015 HC 682 Published on 26 March 2015 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rory Stewart MP (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) (Chair) Richard Benyon MP (Conservative, Newbury) Rt Hon Jeffrey M. Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Rt Hon Dr Julian Lewis MP (Conservative, New Forest East) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Sir Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Bob Stewart MP (Conservative, Beckenham) Ms Gisela Stuart MP (Labour, Birmingham, Edgbaston) Derek Twigg MP (Labour, Halton) John Woodcock MP (Labour/Co–op, Barrow and Furness) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in the House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/defcom and by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the Committee’s website on the inquiry page. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are James Rhys (Clerk), Leoni Kurt (Second Clerk), Eleanor Scarnell (Committee Specialist), Ian Thomson (Committee Specialist), Christine Randall (Senior Committee Assistant), Alison Pratt and Carolyn Bowes (Committee Assistants).
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Thatcher & the Miners
    Pierre-François GOUIFFES MARGARET THATCHER & THE MINERS 1972-1985 Thirteen years that changed Britain Creative Commons Licence 2009 This e-book is the English translation of “Margaret Thatcher face aux mineurs”, Privat, France (2007) Comments on the French edition Lord Brittan (Home Secretary 1983-5, former Vice-President of the European Commission) “The fairness and accuracy of the book are impressive both in the narrative and the analysis. I am not aware of anything comparable to what Pierre-François Gouiffès has produced.” Dr Kim Howells MP (now Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, spokesman for the NUM South Wales area in 1983-5) “Mr. Gouiffès’ book describes key events, such as the 'winter of discontent' and the industrial disputes of the eighties which had a major impact on the Labour party.” Other material available on www.pfgouiffes.net or www.mtfam.fr TABLE OF CONTENT Foreword 3 Prologue: the rise and fall of ‘King Coal’ 12 Coal: its economic, social and symbolic importance in the United Kingdom during the 19th century 13 The painful aftermath of World War One 18 The search for consensus after 1945 24 Tensions escalate from the 1960s 29 The NUM victorious: the strikes of 1972 and 1974 42 Crystallization of conflict 43 The 1972 blitzkrieg strike 51 1974: an arm-wrestling contest leading to strike and General Election 63 The legacy of the strikes of the 1970s 75 1974-1984 : the Labour interlude and Margaret Thatcher's early performance 80 The Labour interlude 81 The early years of Margaret Thatcher 108 The 1984-5 strike part one: from explosion to war of attrition 133 First steps in the conflict 134 The flashpoint 143 2 MRS.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberation; Truth’S Traitor
    Liberation; Truth’s Traitor By Felicity Arbuthnot Theme: Law and Justice Global Research, May 04, 2008 In-depth Report: IRAQ REPORT 4 May 2008 The world is about to witness more “justice” in Iraq. It will be summary execution, ordered by a U.S. convened Court, under United States and United Kingdom jurisdiction and responsibility, as occupying forces. Another trial, another lynch mob, this time of Iraq’s former Deputy Prime Minster and Foreign Minister, Tareq Aziz, which began on 29th April and will resume on 20th May. He stands trial with Ali Hassan al-Majid, already sentenced to death for the campaign against the Kurds in the late eighties (whatever about the shocking harshness of the retribution, many had ceded to Iran, against their own country, during the US driven, eight year Iran-Iraq war, a treasonable offence in any language) and Saddam Hussein’s half- brother, Watban Ibrahim al-Hassan, former Interior Minister Sabbawi Ibrahim al-Hassan, Mizban Khudier Hadi, former Revolutionary Command Council Member, Saddam Hussein’s former secretary, Abid Hamid Mahmud, former Finance Minister Ahmed Hussein Khudier and the former Governor of the Central Bank of Iraq, Essam Rasheed Khuwaish. The Central Bank has been appropriated by JP Morgan Chase, to which former Prime Minister, Anthony Charles Lynton Blair, QC., is now, ironically, an “advisor”. As the clock ticks towards a trial for Blair for lying the country – indeed the world, since so many of the false facts came from Whitehall – into an illegal war, high crimes and misdemeanours and crimes against humanity, some enterprising politician should ask a Parliamentary Question as to when the JP Morgan Chase deal was hatched and what some cynics suggest was (heaven forbid) part of Blair’s pay off package.
    [Show full text]
  • The Good, the Bad and the Ugly a Decade of Labour’S Arms Exports
    The Good, the Bad and the Ugly A decade of Labour’s arms exports SAFERWORLD MAY 2007 Authors and acknowledgements This paper was written by Mark Curtis, an independent researcher and author, and Helen Close, Vanessa Dury and Roy Isbister, Saferworld. The authors would like to thank Claire Hickson and Henry Smith, Saferworld, for their advice and contributions to this paper. The report was copy edited by Lucy Greeves. This document was produced with the financial assistance of Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, the Network for Social Change and Polden-Puckham Charitable Foundation as part of Saferworld’s arms transfer control programme. © Saferworld, May 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Saferworld welcomes and encourages the utilisation and dissemination of the material included in this publication. Acronyms and abbreviations ATT International Arms Trade Treaty DESi Defence Systems and Equipment International Exhibition DESO Defence Export Services Organisation DFID Department for International Development DRC Democratic Republic of Congo ECA Export Control Act ECGD Export Credit Guarantee Department FCO Foreign and Commonwealth Office HMRC Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs HUDs Heads-up display units MoD Ministry of Defence OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OIEL Open Individual Export Licence POA Programme of Action
    [Show full text]
  • The Intelligence and Security Committee: a Select Bibliography
    The Intelligence and Security Committee: A Select Bibliography Standard Note: SN/HA/6126 Last updated: 18 October 2011 Author: Alexander Horne and Diana Douse Section Home Affairs Section This paper is essentially a short selective bibliography of resources on the Intelligence and Security Committee. The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) was established by the Intelligence Services Act 1994 to examine the policy, administration and expenditure of the Security Service, Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), and the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). The Committee has developed its oversight remit, with the Government's agreement, to include examination of intelligence-related elements of the Cabinet Office including: the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC); the Assessments Staff; and the Intelligence, Security and Resilience Group. The Committee also takes evidence from the Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS), part of the Ministry of Defence. The Prime Minister appoints the ISC Members after considering nominations from Parliament and consulting with the Leader of the Opposition. The Committee reports directly to the Prime Minister, and through him to Parliament, by the publication of the Committee's reports. The Members of the Committee are subject to Section 1(1)(b) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 and have access to highly classified material in carrying out their duties. The Committee takes evidence from Cabinet Ministers and senior officials. The Committee is currently chaired by Sir Malcolm Rifkind. Previous Chairs include: Dr Kim Howells; Margaret Beckett; Paul Murphy; Ann Taylor (now Baroness Taylor of Bolton); and Tom King (now Lord King of Bridgwater). This note includes links to the Committee’s annual reports, proposals for reform (most relevantly the Green Paper on Justice and Security (CM 8194) published in October 2011) and some further reading.
    [Show full text]