DOCSLIB.ORG

The Impact of Economic Sanctions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Impact of Economic Sanctions HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on Economic Affairs 2nd Report of Session 2006–07 The Impact of Economic Sanctions Volume II: Evidence Ordered to be printed 24 April 2007 and published 9 May 2007 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords London : The Stationery Office Limited £price HL Paper 96-II CONTENTS Oral Evidence Foreign and Commonwealth Office Written evidence 1 Oral evidence 27 June 2006 12 Dr Kern Alexander, University of Cambridge Written evidence 24 Oral evidence 4 July 2006 30 Mr Alex Singleton, Globalisation Institute Oral evidence 11 July 2006 39 Mr Carne Ross, Independent Diplomat Written evidence 43 Oral evidence 11 July 2006 47 Mr Alex Yearsley, Global Witness Oral evidence 18 July 2006 57 Mr John Hilary, War on Want Oral evidence 18 July 2006 65 Confederation of British Industry (CBI) Written evidence 70 Oral evidence 10 October 2006 75 Supplementary written evidence 79 Mr Joakim Kreutz Oral evidence 10 October 2006 80 European Commission Written evidence 85 Oral evidence 17 October 2006 91 The Lord Renwick of Clifton Oral evidence 17 October 2006 97 Dr Kim Howells MP, Minister of State, and officials, Foreign and Commonwealth Office Oral evidence 24 October 2006 101 Mr Alex Vines, Royal Institute of International Affairs Written evidence 107 Oral evidence 24 October 2006 109 Written Evidence British Bankers’ Association 114 British Exporters Association 116 Ms Rachel Barnes 117 Mr Jeremy P Carver 129 Council for Arab-British Understanding 133 Professor Margaret Doxey 138 European Banking Federation 142 Mr Mikael Eriksson 142 HSBC Holdings 147 Professor Peter Fitzgerald 149 Professor Michael P Malloy 158 Dr Colin Rowat 163 Mr H C von Sponeck 168 Mr Derek Tonkin CMG 170 United Nations Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs 175 Voices for Burma 176 NOTE: The Report of the Committee is published in Volume I, HL Paper No. 96-I The Evidence of the Committee is published in Volume II, HL Paper No. 96-II Evidence received by the Committee but not printed can be inspected through the Parliamentary Archives (0207 219 2333), email [email protected] 3576972001 Page Type [Ex 1] 30-04-07 19:04:19 Pag Table: LOENEW PPSysB Unit: PAG1 Minutes of Evidence TAKEN BEFORE THE ECONOMIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE MONDAY 27 JUNE 2006 Present Kingsdown, L Sheldon, L Macdonald of Tradeston, L Skidelsky, L Paul, L Vallance of Tummel, L Powell of Bayswater, L Wakeham, L (Chairman) Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay, L Memorandum by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office 1. The notion that severe humanitarian costs from effective comprehensive economic sanctions can be avoided by exemptions appears to be fundamentally flawed. First, humanitarian exemptions will be permitted by those imposing them only at the margin so that the aim of severely weakening the economy of the target country in order achieve political goals is not undermined. The extensive exemptions necessary to avoid severe humanitarian costs would by their very nature mean that the sanctions were not comprehensive. In other words, severely damaging the economy of the target state is not separable from severe humanitarian costs. Second, when an economy is weakened severely, the most vulnerable, especially the poor, suffer the most. Third, the government of the target country will concentrate its remaining resources on prioritising itself and its supporters. Fourth, the government of the target country will have a major incentive to limit its cooperation with humanitarian exemptions in an effort to undermine the sanctions. Fifth, the governments of the sanction countries will have a major incentive to blame the government of the target country for any humanitarian costs in order to avoid modifying the sanctions. How would you respond to this assessment? The Government notes that the recent trend in UN sanctions has been towards the use of more targeted measures which are designed specifically to limit any humanitarian impact. There are currently no comprehensive UN sanctions in force. Where targeted sanctions are being used, these include humanitarian exemptions. For example, in the case of the travel bans in place against individuals in relation to Liberia sanctions there are provisions which allow travel for humanitarian purposes such as to receive medical treatment overseas. Such exemptions play an important role in alleviating any unnecessary impact which sanctions could have on a target. The Government believes that even where sanctions regimes have been extensive, the use of mechanisms to exempt the provision of humanitarian supplies can play a vital role. This was the case with the sanctions in place in relation to Iraq, where the Security Council agreed the operation of the Oil-for-Food Programme. The Programme made substantial progress in alleviating the situation of the Iraqi people, despite ongoing eVorts by the regime to frustrate such eVorts. The United Nations reported that the Programme helped increase the Iraqi ration and reduce the incidence of tuberculosis. UNICEF reported a reduction in the child mortality rate in northern Iraq. The World Health Organisation reported a reduction in the incidence of chronic malnutrition among children under five. The Government agrees that the objectives of the target state will often be at variance with the purposes of sanctions. However, the progress made in alleviating humanitarian suVering in the case of Iraq sanctions was achieved despite the Iraqi regime’s eVorts to frustrate and obstruct progress. This included attempts to block agreement on an Oil-for-Food Programme, failure to adequately distribute medical supplies and attempts to frustrate the work of international NGOs and UN humanitarian workers. 2. Would a finding of potential or actual severe humanitarian costs—for example by an expert panel advising a UN sanctions committee—trigger British support for the modification of such sanctions to ensure that such costs cease to be inflicted? Would it support their lifting should such modification be impractical? With the trend towards more targeted measures, the humanitarian impact of such sanctions has been minimised. However, the Government would take into account information about the humanitarian impact of sanctions, in line with its policy as set out in the 1998 Whitehall Review of Sanctions Policy announced 3576972001 Page Type [E] 30-04-07 19:04:19 Pag Table: LOENEW PPSysB Unit: PAG1 2 impact of economic sanctions: evidence 27 June 2006 to Parliament on 15 March 1999. The Whitehall Review concluded that better targeting of sanctions would minimise the risk of harm to ordinary people and that sanctions regimes should include exemptions to minimise the humanitarian impact on civilians. The precise way in which sanctions might be modified in the event of any humanitarian impact would depend on the specific situation. 3. In considering whether to impose, continue, modify or lift comprehensive economic sanctions, to what extent are the likely views of the population of the target population or the views of domestic or exiled opposition movements a consideration? In considering whether to seek the imposition, continuation, modification or lifting of sanctions, the Government has to weigh a number of factors, including the appropriateness of the measures proposed against the policy objective and, in the case of lifting sanctions, whether that objective has been met. The Government also needs to take into account the level of international support and the impact of the measures on the target’s population. All these can be aVected by the views of representatives of the target’s population and/or opposition groups. However, in the case of extensive measures, such as those in relation to Iraq, the nature of the regime holding power can make it diYcult to get an accurate and consistent picture of the population’s views. These views may also vary according to diVerent constituencies within the population. In the case of South Africa, the Government disagreed with the calls for sanctions from many representatives of South Africa’s black population. Whereas the calls for sanctions on Haiti by the deposed President Aristide and his supporters, were an important factor in generating international support for the measures taken in relation to Haiti. But in all cases, the Government’s support for humanitarian exemptions—the Oil-for-Food Programme being the most extensive—shows that as a matter of policy it seeks to limit the humanitarian impact of sanctions on the general population. 4. In the last three years, to what extent have UN panels of experts and sanctions reviews been successful in bringing about modifications of sanctions to improve their effectiveness and limit their humanitarian and other costs? The bodies of experts which monitor sanctions implementation play a crucial role in reporting on the eVectiveness of sanctions to the Security Council and in making recommendations for further modification. Only in the case of Liberia sanctions has a body of experts explicitly been mandated to consider the humanitarian impact. However, there are a large number of instances where sanctions have been modified in the light of UN expert reports and reviews of sanctions. These include the greater use of targeted sanctions against individuals in respect of Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in 2005, Cote d’Ivoire and Sudan in 2006 and the widening of the scope of the arms embargo in relation to DRC in 2005. In the case of Liberia, the Security Council decided in 2006 to suspend the timber ban for 90 days, while expressing its intention
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dangerous Ambivalence: UK Policy on Torture Since 9/11
    November 2006 Number 1 Dangerous Ambivalence: UK Policy on Torture since 9/11 Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 Lessons from History ...............................................................................................3 A New Ambivalence toward Torture ......................................................................... 6 Torture as Response to Terrorism ........................................................................7 Human rights and security: the false dichotomy.............................................7 Policing and prosecution as a means of confronting terror ............................ 9 The cost of abandoning the rules................................................................. 12 Undermining the Torture Ban ................................................................................. 14 Torture Evidence in Legal Proceedings:.............................................................. 14 Sending People back to the Risk of Torture........................................................16 The British way ............................................................................................ 21 No safeguard against torture .......................................................................24 Trying to Rewrite the Rules on Deportation to Torture.........................................27 Complicity in U.S. Abduction and Torture: British Refusal to Ask Questions ......30 Complicity in Illegal Transfers............................................................................34
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence and Security Committee Annual Report 2009-2010
    Intelligence and Security Committee Annual Report 2009–2010 Chairman: The Rt. Hon. Dr Kim Howells, MP Intelligence and Security Committee Annual Report 2009–2010 Chairman: The Rt. Hon. Dr Kim Howells, MP Intelligence Services Act 1994 Chapter 13 Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty March 2010 Cm 7844 £14.35 © Crown copyright 2010 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please contact the Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected]. ISBN: 9780101784429 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2354911 03/10 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. From: The Chairman, The Rt. Hon. Dr Kim Howells, MP INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMITTEE 35 Great Smith Street, London SW1P 3BQ ISC 2009/10/078 05 March 2010 Rt. Hon. Gordon Brown, MP Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A 2AA I enclose the Intelligence and Security Committee’s Annual Report for 2009–2010. This covers our work between August 2009 and March 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • OVERSEAS TRAVEL by MINISTERS 1 April 2007 – 31 March 2008
    OVERSEAS TRAVEL BY MINISTERS 1 April 2007 – 31 March 2008 CABINET OFFICE JULY 2008 OVERSEAS TRAVEL BY MINISTERS 2007 – 2008 INDEX Page Attorney General’s Office 1 Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform 2 Cabinet Office 7 Minister for the Olympics and London 8 Chief Whip (Commons) 9 Chief Whip (Lords) 10 Department for Children, Schools and Families 11 Department for Communities and Local Government 13 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 14 Ministry of Defence 16 Deputy Prime Minister’s Office 19 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 20 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 24 Department of Health 33 Home Office 34 Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills 37 Department for International Development 38 Ministry of Justice 42 Lord Privy Seal and Leader of the House of Commons 44 Lord President of the Council and Leader of the House of Lords 45 Northern Ireland Office 46 Prime Minister’s Office 47 Scotland Office 49 Department for Transport 50 HM Treasury 52 Wales Office 54 Department for Work and Pensions 55 OVERSEAS TRAVEL BY MINISTERS 2007 – 2008 ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFFICE Dates Minister Destination Purpose of Trip Scheduled, ‘No No. of Officials Total cost 32 (The Royal) Accompanying including travel Squadron’, or Minister, where & ‘Other RAF’ or non scheduled accommodation ‘Charter’ travel used Attorney General 18 - 19 April Rt Hon Lord Luxembourg Justice and Home Affairs Council Scheduled £676 2007 Goldsmith QC 25 May Rt Hon Lord Munich, Meetings with G8 Justice and Interior Ministers Other RAF
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded At: Surveillance-DATAPSST-DCSS-Nov2015.Pdf
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Lashmar, P. ORCID: 0000-0001-9049-3985 (2018). From silence to primary definer: The rise of the Intelligence lobby in the public sphere. Critical Sociology, doi: 10.1177/0896920518780987 This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/20272/ Link to published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0896920518780987 Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] From silence to primary definer: The emergence of an Intelligence lobby in the public sphere. Abstract Until the end of the Cold War the UK intelligence services were not officially acknowledged, and their personnel were banned from entering the public sphere. From 1989 the UK government began to put the intelligence services on a legal footing and release the identity of the heads of the intelligence agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    Rethinking US Policy Towards Iran’s Nuclear Programme Surulola James Eke Western support for Iran’s nuclear programme gave way to opposition when it was realised that alongside non-military use, the Islamic Re- public was pursuing a nuclear weapons programme. Driven by Tehran’s policy of aggression in the Middle East and elsewhere, Western states under us coordination intensified the pressure on Iran to abandon its alleged nuclear weapons programme. Rather than halting uranium enrichment in Iran, however, years of stifling economic, scientific and military sanctions have only caused the country to take a more clan- destine approach. Though us-led restrictions have slowed down the pace of Iranian nuclear development, they have been unable to make Tehran come clean about its plans. While maintaining the correctness of the us position on Iran’s nuclear ambitions, this work argues that the policy of restrictions must be reshaped in order to limit its effect on ordinary Iranians. These citizens are identified as potential drivers of change. Seeking their support is crucial for the success of global efforts to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons – hence, the need to restructure restrictions. Keywords: Iran, nuclear weapons, United States, policy, sanctions, restrictions Introduction The nature of nuclear activities in Iran suggests that the country is on a path to nuclear weapons production. In heading there, it has taken Scan this article onto your two routes: highly enriched uranium (heu) and plutonium production. mobile device Despite the denials of Iranian government ofcials, components of the 38 state’s programme and the secrecy of its nuclear dealings bolster the claims of world powers that there is a military dimension to the Islamic Republic’s uranium enrichment plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Trident: the Deal Isn't Done
    Trident: The Deal Isn’t Done Serious Questions Remain Unanswered Dr. Nick Ritchie Bradford Disarmament Research Centre Department of Peace Studies : University of Bradford : December 2007 About this briefing This briefing paper is the first in a series to published through 2007 and 2008 as part of the Bradford Disarmament Research Centre’s programme on “Nuclear-armed Britain: A Critical Examination of Trident Modernisation, Implications and Accountability”. The programme has been generously funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. To find out more please visit www.brad.ac.uk/acad/bdrc/nuclear/trident/trident.html. About the author Nick Ritchie is a Post-Doctoral Research Fellow at the Department of Peace Studies, University of Bradford. He is lead researcher on the “Nuclear-armed Britain” programme. He previously worked for six years as a researcher at the Oxford Research Group on global security issues, in particular nuclear proliferation, arms control and disarmament. His PhD thesis examined the evolution of US nuclear weapons policy from 1990-2004. Recent publications include The Political Road to War with Iraq with Paul Rogers (Routledge, 2007), Replacing Trident: Britain, America and Nuclear Weapons, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 28 No. 2 (August 2007), and Replacing Trident: Who Will Make the Decisions and How? (Oxford Research Group report, August 2006). Acknowledgments The author would like to thank the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, Paul Rogers, Malcolm Dando and Simon Whitby for their support and comments. The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Peace Studies or the University of Bradford.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of Evidence, Education and Skills Committee: UK Euniversity
    UNCORRECTED TRANSCRIPT OF ORAL EVIDENCE To be published as HC 755-iii House of COMMONS MINUTES OF EVIDENCE TAKEN BEFORE EDUCATION AND SKILLS COMMITTEE UK eUNIVERSITY Monday 8 November 2004 DR KIM HOWELLS MP Evidence heard in Public Questions 347 - 479 USE OF THE TRANSCRIPT 1. This is an uncorrected transcript of evidence taken in public and reported to the House. The transcript has been placed on the internet on the authority of the Committee, and copies have been made available by the Vote Office for the use of Members and others. 2. Any public use of, or reference to, the contents should make clear that neither witnesses nor Members have had the opportunity to correct the record. The transcript is not yet an approved formal record of these proceedings. 3. Members who receive this for the purpose of correcting questions addressed by them to witnesses are asked to send corrections to the Committee Assistant. 4. Prospective witnesses may receive this in preparation for any written or oral evidence they may in due course give to the Committee. 1 1 February 2005 From www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmeduski/uc755-iii/uc75502.htm Oral Evidence Taken before the Education and Skills Committee on Monday 8 November 2004 Members present Mr Barry Sheerman, in the Chair Mr David Chaytor Valerie Davey Jeff Ennis Paul Holmes Mr Robert Jackson Helen Jones Jonathan Shaw Mr Andrew Turner ________________ Witnesses: Dr Kim Howells, a Member of the House, Minister of State for Lifelong Learning, Further and Higher Education, Department for Education and Skills, examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision-Making in Defence Policy
    House of Commons Defence Committee Decision-making in Defence Policy Eleventh Report of Session 2014–15 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 18 March 2015 HC 682 Published on 26 March 2015 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rory Stewart MP (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) (Chair) Richard Benyon MP (Conservative, Newbury) Rt Hon Jeffrey M. Donaldson MP (Democratic Unionist, Lagan Valley) Mr James Gray MP (Conservative, North Wiltshire) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Rt Hon Dr Julian Lewis MP (Conservative, New Forest East) Mrs Madeleine Moon MP (Labour, Bridgend) Sir Bob Russell MP (Liberal Democrat, Colchester) Bob Stewart MP (Conservative, Beckenham) Ms Gisela Stuart MP (Labour, Birmingham, Edgbaston) Derek Twigg MP (Labour, Halton) John Woodcock MP (Labour/Co–op, Barrow and Furness) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in the House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/defcom and by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the Committee’s website on the inquiry page. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are James Rhys (Clerk), Leoni Kurt (Second Clerk), Eleanor Scarnell (Committee Specialist), Ian Thomson (Committee Specialist), Christine Randall (Senior Committee Assistant), Alison Pratt and Carolyn Bowes (Committee Assistants).
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Thatcher & the Miners
    Pierre-François GOUIFFES MARGARET THATCHER & THE MINERS 1972-1985 Thirteen years that changed Britain Creative Commons Licence 2009 This e-book is the English translation of “Margaret Thatcher face aux mineurs”, Privat, France (2007) Comments on the French edition Lord Brittan (Home Secretary 1983-5, former Vice-President of the European Commission) “The fairness and accuracy of the book are impressive both in the narrative and the analysis. I am not aware of anything comparable to what Pierre-François Gouiffès has produced.” Dr Kim Howells MP (now Minister of State at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, spokesman for the NUM South Wales area in 1983-5) “Mr. Gouiffès’ book describes key events, such as the 'winter of discontent' and the industrial disputes of the eighties which had a major impact on the Labour party.” Other material available on www.pfgouiffes.net or www.mtfam.fr TABLE OF CONTENT Foreword 3 Prologue: the rise and fall of ‘King Coal’ 12 Coal: its economic, social and symbolic importance in the United Kingdom during the 19th century 13 The painful aftermath of World War One 18 The search for consensus after 1945 24 Tensions escalate from the 1960s 29 The NUM victorious: the strikes of 1972 and 1974 42 Crystallization of conflict 43 The 1972 blitzkrieg strike 51 1974: an arm-wrestling contest leading to strike and General Election 63 The legacy of the strikes of the 1970s 75 1974-1984 : the Labour interlude and Margaret Thatcher's early performance 80 The Labour interlude 81 The early years of Margaret Thatcher 108 The 1984-5 strike part one: from explosion to war of attrition 133 First steps in the conflict 134 The flashpoint 143 2 MRS.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberation; Truth’S Traitor
    Liberation; Truth’s Traitor By Felicity Arbuthnot Theme: Law and Justice Global Research, May 04, 2008 In-depth Report: IRAQ REPORT 4 May 2008 The world is about to witness more “justice” in Iraq. It will be summary execution, ordered by a U.S. convened Court, under United States and United Kingdom jurisdiction and responsibility, as occupying forces. Another trial, another lynch mob, this time of Iraq’s former Deputy Prime Minster and Foreign Minister, Tareq Aziz, which began on 29th April and will resume on 20th May. He stands trial with Ali Hassan al-Majid, already sentenced to death for the campaign against the Kurds in the late eighties (whatever about the shocking harshness of the retribution, many had ceded to Iran, against their own country, during the US driven, eight year Iran-Iraq war, a treasonable offence in any language) and Saddam Hussein’s half- brother, Watban Ibrahim al-Hassan, former Interior Minister Sabbawi Ibrahim al-Hassan, Mizban Khudier Hadi, former Revolutionary Command Council Member, Saddam Hussein’s former secretary, Abid Hamid Mahmud, former Finance Minister Ahmed Hussein Khudier and the former Governor of the Central Bank of Iraq, Essam Rasheed Khuwaish. The Central Bank has been appropriated by JP Morgan Chase, to which former Prime Minister, Anthony Charles Lynton Blair, QC., is now, ironically, an “advisor”. As the clock ticks towards a trial for Blair for lying the country – indeed the world, since so many of the false facts came from Whitehall – into an illegal war, high crimes and misdemeanours and crimes against humanity, some enterprising politician should ask a Parliamentary Question as to when the JP Morgan Chase deal was hatched and what some cynics suggest was (heaven forbid) part of Blair’s pay off package.
    [Show full text]
  • The Good, the Bad and the Ugly a Decade of Labour’S Arms Exports
    The Good, the Bad and the Ugly A decade of Labour’s arms exports SAFERWORLD MAY 2007 Authors and acknowledgements This paper was written by Mark Curtis, an independent researcher and author, and Helen Close, Vanessa Dury and Roy Isbister, Saferworld. The authors would like to thank Claire Hickson and Henry Smith, Saferworld, for their advice and contributions to this paper. The report was copy edited by Lucy Greeves. This document was produced with the financial assistance of Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, the Network for Social Change and Polden-Puckham Charitable Foundation as part of Saferworld’s arms transfer control programme. © Saferworld, May 2007. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without full attribution. Saferworld welcomes and encourages the utilisation and dissemination of the material included in this publication. Acronyms and abbreviations ATT International Arms Trade Treaty DESi Defence Systems and Equipment International Exhibition DESO Defence Export Services Organisation DFID Department for International Development DRC Democratic Republic of Congo ECA Export Control Act ECGD Export Credit Guarantee Department FCO Foreign and Commonwealth Office HMRC Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs HUDs Heads-up display units MoD Ministry of Defence OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OIEL Open Individual Export Licence POA Programme of Action
    [Show full text]
  • The Intelligence and Security Committee: a Select Bibliography
    The Intelligence and Security Committee: A Select Bibliography Standard Note: SN/HA/6126 Last updated: 18 October 2011 Author: Alexander Horne and Diana Douse Section Home Affairs Section This paper is essentially a short selective bibliography of resources on the Intelligence and Security Committee. The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) was established by the Intelligence Services Act 1994 to examine the policy, administration and expenditure of the Security Service, Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), and the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ). The Committee has developed its oversight remit, with the Government's agreement, to include examination of intelligence-related elements of the Cabinet Office including: the Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC); the Assessments Staff; and the Intelligence, Security and Resilience Group. The Committee also takes evidence from the Defence Intelligence Staff (DIS), part of the Ministry of Defence. The Prime Minister appoints the ISC Members after considering nominations from Parliament and consulting with the Leader of the Opposition. The Committee reports directly to the Prime Minister, and through him to Parliament, by the publication of the Committee's reports. The Members of the Committee are subject to Section 1(1)(b) of the Official Secrets Act 1989 and have access to highly classified material in carrying out their duties. The Committee takes evidence from Cabinet Ministers and senior officials. The Committee is currently chaired by Sir Malcolm Rifkind. Previous Chairs include: Dr Kim Howells; Margaret Beckett; Paul Murphy; Ann Taylor (now Baroness Taylor of Bolton); and Tom King (now Lord King of Bridgwater). This note includes links to the Committee’s annual reports, proposals for reform (most relevantly the Green Paper on Justice and Security (CM 8194) published in October 2011) and some further reading.
    [Show full text]