Urban Landscape Change in New Orleans, LA: the Case of the Lost Neighborhood of Louis Armstrong

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Urban Landscape Change in New Orleans, LA: the Case of the Lost Neighborhood of Louis Armstrong University of New Orleans ScholarWorks@UNO University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations Dissertations and Theses 5-21-2005 Urban Landscape Change in New Orleans, LA: The Case of the Lost Neighborhood of Louis Armstrong Willard Fields University of New Orleans Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td Recommended Citation Fields, Willard, "Urban Landscape Change in New Orleans, LA: The Case of the Lost Neighborhood of Louis Armstrong" (2005). University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations. 151. https://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/151 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by ScholarWorks@UNO with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in University of New Orleans Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. URBAN LANDSCAPE CHANGE IN NEW ORLEANS, LA: THE CASE OF THE LOST NEIGHBORHOOD OF LOUIS ARMSTRONG A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of New Orleans in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The College of Urban and Public Affairs by Willard Fields B.A., Trinity University, 1991 M.A., University of New Orleans, 1998 May 2004 Foreword: Parading on Empty Streets: The Lost Landscape of the Cradle of Jazz On Liberty, Perdido, Franklin and Poydras there were honky-tonks at every corner and in each one of them musical instruments of every kind were played. At the corner of the street where I lived was the famous Funky Butt Hall, where I first heard Buddy Bolden play. He was blowing up a storm. That neighborhood certainly had a lot to offer. (Louis Armstrong 1951, p. 22 and 23) But the site of this parade- the cold, empty streets of the Central Business District- betrayed [the mayor’s] claim to street level authenticity. Those streets flanked by glass and steel skyscrapers- which are the mayor’s corridors of power and, arguably, his real constituency- yielded up no followers who would join into the parade. (Regis 1999, p. 496) On a hot evening in August of 2001, a group of participants in the Louis Armstrong Centennial Conference gathered to celebrate the 100th anniversary of Armstrong’s birth with a tour of the jazz master’s old neighborhood in the central business district of New Orleans. Many in the crowd of more than forty people had undoubtedly read about this neighborhood in Armstrong’s autobiography Satchmo. In Armstrong’s eloquent, almost lyrical prose style, tales of the grinding poverty and violence of the neighborhood are counter-posed with street scenes of ecstatic musical transcendence. Armstrong describes a world of street parades, honky-tonks, and church choirs filling the streets with music. A diverse set of characters from prostitutes to church people to judges to jazz musicians populate Armstrong’s portrait of his neighborhood. Armstrong’s recollections provide an important description of what turned out to be the first landscape of jazz1. ii On this afternoon, the neighborhood that helped send Armstrong off into the world with the rich musical heritage of jazz was deserted. A sea of empty parking lots surrounded the last few nineteenth-century buildings. Only a few blocks away, the Superdome and business towers vaulted into the sky, protected from the low-income neighborhoods to the north by the elevated wall of Interstate-10. The only sign that jazz had sprung from this area was a mural of a clarinet painted on the side of the high-rise Holiday Inn, the self-proclaimed “jazziest hotel in New Orleans.” During the 20th century, the Perdido Street neighborhood was transformed from an area “that had a lot to offer” for Louis Armstrong to a corridor of power and parking lots that “yielded up no followers who would join the parade” (Regis 1999, p. 496) for the 1998 inaugural of then-Mayor Marc Morial. The question of how the vibrant, flawed neighborhood of Armstrong’s childhood became a forgotten parking district of a modern central business district is the subject of this work. Two basic angles are taken to address this question. First, addressing this question requires both a cultural and morphological understanding of change in this neighborhood. This work seeks to address landscape change as the interface of cultural and morphological change. To accomplish this, this work examines the changes in the built environment that transformed the landscape of jazz, with its densely packed, diverse mix of dwellings, honky-tonks, stores, and governmental uses, into a lost landscape of surface parking, abandoned buildings, and specialized high-rise uses. Through the use of detailed records of land use change found in planning and insurance documents, augmented by a time-series of aerial and ground photographs, both the chronology of change as well as the specific physical changes of the area are iii documented. This physical portrait is expanded to include the voice of early jazz found in the descriptions of the area by both jazz scholars and the musicians themselves. Second, this descriptive approach is broadened through an analysis of the political economy of landscape change in the New Orleans central business district. The transformation of Armstrong’s neighborhood into a part of the central business district was affected by a series of urban planning documents created by the political and business elites of the city. Each of these plans sought to make major changes to the essential morphological structure of the city to enhance the power and prestige of the downtown core. The methods used for achieving their goal of creating a solid central business district mirrored the nationwide currents of modernist planning thought. While New Orleans lacked legislative authority to enact “urban renewal” practices until 1968, the modernist philosophy of these practices was at work in the city well before this date. Major street widening and Interstate building projects cleared out low-income residents in linear swaths while the core of Armstrong’s old neighborhood was cleared for a new Civic Center complex. The result of these major changes was de jure urban renewal2. Structure of Dissertation This dissertation is broken up into three main parts. First, a literature review section provides an overview of the important concepts and methodologies employed in this work. Chapter one explores the meaning and use of public space in the contemporary city. A near universal complaint about the quality of contemporary public space is the problem of lost space or units of poorly designed and used spaces. Chapter one explores how urban design scholars and historians have explained the growth of these areas. Chapter two concludes the literature review section. This chapter articulates the iv methodology to be used in tracking land use change in this work. The techniques of the urban morphologic approach are explored and articulated in this chapter. In the second section, the intersection of morphological and cultural change in New Orleans is explored. Chapter three presents the results of an urban design analysis of the contemporary central business district of New Orleans. This analysis utilizes lost space indicators to track the extent of poor urban design in the CBD. To provide a strong footing for in depth discussions of morphological change in New Orleans, chapter four looks at the historic morphology of New Orleans from its founding through 1900 with a special emphasis on the cultural roots of the city. Chapter five presents a morphological and social portrait of the early twentieth century Perdido Street area that Louis Armstrong called home. This area formed the backbone of the landscape of the cradle of jazz, the place from which jazz was incubated. Chapter six looks at how this amazing place was gradually altered from the 1920s to 1937 through an examination of Sanborn and photographic evidence3. Chapter seven utilizes government and photographic evidence to articulate the important morphological changes that occurred in the city during its high modernist transformation from 1947 to 1974. While complete Sanborn records do not exist for this period, the detailed planning record provides ample evidence of the dramatic changes that altered the area socially and morphologically. The dissertation concludes with two chapters that explore the issue of appropriate landscape management. Chapter eight explores the concepts of modernism as articulated by Marshall Berman. Berman’s intricate discussion of the tension between the modern imperatives of change and the desire to preserve is applied to landscape v changes that have been identified in Louis Armstrong’s old neighborhood. In this chapter Armstrong, who lived in the neighborhood, and Robert Moses, whose plans helped alter it, conceptually meet on Perdido Street. Their meeting tells us a great deal about the importance of historic landscapes and the people who make these places home. The final chapter provides an examination of the current efforts in New Orleans to revitalize the jazz district around the Perdido Street area. This concluding chapter explores the possibilities of utilizing design review as a mechanism to positively mange the unique landscape of the Perdido Street area. In addition, a technical appendix is presented to help define the specific techniques that were utilized in the construction of the historic morphological model of New Orleans. The techniques utilized in this dissertation proved to provide an excellent framework for exploring historic city change at the micro-level.
Recommended publications
  • Urban Public Space, Privatization, and Protest in Louis Armstrong Park and the Treme, New Orleans
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 2001 Protecting 'Place' in African -American Neighborhoods: Urban Public Space, Privatization, and Protest in Louis Armstrong Park and the Treme, New Orleans. Michael Eugene Crutcher Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Crutcher, Michael Eugene Jr, "Protecting 'Place' in African -American Neighborhoods: Urban Public Space, Privatization, and Protest in Louis Armstrong Park and the Treme, New Orleans." (2001). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 272. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/272 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverfront Expressway Cancellation, Shuddering at the New Orleans That Could Have Been
    Geographies of New Orleans Fifty Years After Riverfront Expressway Cancellation, Shuddering at the New Orleans That Could Have Been Richard Campanella Geographer, Tulane School of Architecture [email protected] Published in the New Orleans Picayune-Advocate, August 12, 2019, page 1. Fifty years ago this summer, reports from Washington D.C. reached New Orleans that John Volpe, secretary of the Department of Transportation under President Richard Nixon, had cancelled the Riverfront Expressway—the high-speed, elevated interstate slated for the French Quarter. The stunning news, about a wildly controversy plan that had divided the community for years, was met with elation by the city’s growing preservationist movement, and head-shaking disappointment by local leaders in both the public and private sectors. A half-century on, the cancellation and the original proposal invite speculation —part mental exercise, part cautionary tale—about what greater New Orleans might look like today had the Riverfront Expressway gone forward. And it very nearly did: conventional wisdom at the time saw the new infrastructure as an inevitable step toward progress, following the lead of many other waterfront cities, including New York, San Francisco, and Seattle. But first, a recap on how the New Orleans plan got to Volpe’s desk. Rendering from Robert Moses' Arterial Plan for New Orleans, 1946, page 11, courtesy collection of R. Campanella The initial concept for the Riverfront Expressway emerged from a post-World War II effort among state and city leaders to modernize New Orleans’ antiquated regional transportation system. Toward that end, the state Department of Highways hired the famous—many would say infamous—New York master planner Robert Moses, who along with Andrews & Clark Consulting Engineers, released in 1946 his Arterial Plan for New Orleans.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden District Accommodations Locator
    GARDEN DISTRICT ACCOMMODATIONSJefferson LOCATOR Leontine Octavia BellcastleValmont Duffosat MAP #/PROPERTY/NUMBER OF ROOMS Soniat MAGAZINE Robert GARDEN DISTRICT/UPTOWN STREET LyonsUpperline 1. Avenue Plaza Resort/50 Bordeaux 2. Best Western St. Charles Inn/40 Valence 3. Columns Hotel/20 Cadiz 4. Hampton Inn – Garden District/100 Jena 5. Hotel Indigo New Orleans - Garden District/132 Tchoupitoulas 6. Maison St. Charles Quality Inn & Suites/130 General PershingNapoleonUPTOWN 7. Prytania Park Hotel/90 Marengo Milan Annunciation Laurel Camp Constance GEOGRAPHY ConstantinopleChestnut Coliseum New Orleans encompasses 4,190 square miles or Austerlitz Perrier Gen. Taylor Prytania 10,850 square kilometers and is approximately 90 Pitt Peniston miles from the mouth of the Mississippi River. Carondelet Amelia St.Charles Av Magazine Baronne Antonine CLIMATE Foucher 3 2 New Orleans has a subtropical climate with pleasant Aline 4 year-round temperatures. Temperatures range from Delachaise mid-40°F (7°C) in winter to more than 90°F (32°C) ST. CHARLES in the summer. Rainfall is common in New Orleans, Louisiana with a monthly average of about five inches (12.7 cm) Toledano AVENUE Pleasant of precipitation. 9th Harmony 8th AVERAGE TEMPERATURES AVG. RAINFALL MONTH MAX {°F/°C} MIN {°F/°C} 7th {IN/CM} Camp Jan. 63/17 43/6 4.9/12.4 6th Chestnut Prytania Coliseum Constance Feb. 64/18 45/7 5.2/13.2 Magazine Conery March 72/22 52/11 4.7/11.9 Washington April 79/26 59/15 4.5/11.4 GARDEN 4th May 84/29 64/18 5.1/13.0 June 90/32 72/22 4.6/11.7 DISTRICT 3rd July 91/33 73/23 6.7/17.0 2nd S.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Street Resilience Plan
    NEW ORLEANS MAIN STREET RESILIENCE PLAN Main Street Resilience Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 A project of the New Orleans City Planning Commission Project Goals .................................................................................................................. 1 Robert Rivers, Executive Director, CPC Who is This Plan For? .................................................................................................... 1 Paul Cramer, Planning Administrator, CPC Project History and Related Efforts ................................................................................. 1 Larry Massey, Jr., Principal City Planner, CPC What Are “Main Streets”? ............................................................................................... 2 Overview of the Planning Process .................................................................................. 4 Current and Previous Resilience Work ........................................................................... 6 Consultant Team: 2. Assessing Resilience .................................................................................................... 11 Understanding Resilience ............................................................................................. 11 GCR Inc. Waggonner & Ball Architects Main Street Resilience Framework ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HANO Media Book
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Letter from Administrative Receiver David Gilmore 3 CHAPTER 5: YEAR 2013 Iberville demolition program aims to rebuild lives Public housing residents criticize new for 30 young men and women CHAPTER 1: YEAR 2009 criminal background check policy Times Picayune/NOLA.com 56 Public housing turnaround expert chosen Times Picayune/NOLA.com 29 to lead New Orleans housing authority New Orleans housing authority generates $1.5 million Times Picayune/NOLA.com 5 Residents question Iberville plans, city officials in sales of scattered sites tout future improvements Times Picayune/NOLA.com 61 HANO’s new leader tries novel approach: listening Times Picayune/NOLA.com 31 Times Picayune/NOLA.com 6 CHAPTER 6: YEAR 2014 HANO unveils mobile computer lab Faubourg Lafitte housing project eyes advancement CHAPTER 2: YEAR 2010 Times Picayune/NOLA.com 33 New Orleans City Business 63 HANO proves doubters wrong, lines up plans for stimulus money Times Picayune/NOLA.com 8 HANO recalls 700 Section 8 vouchers, blames sequester U.S. Bank Closes on Financing for Historic Times Picayune/NOLA.com 34 Iberville Housing Redevelopment in New Orleans HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan cuts ribbon U.S. Bank 64 at St. Bernard redevelopment, tours ‘Big Four’ HANO, public housing residents clash Times Picayune/NOLA.com 9 at board meeting over workforce policy CHAPTER 7: BROADCAST MEDIA HIGHLIGHTS Times Picayune/NOLA.com 36 New Lafitte development ready for residents CHAPTER 3: YEAR 2011 WWL 66 HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan thanks public housing Officials witness
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Introduction More than ten years after the worst disaster to befall any U.S. city in American history—necessitating the almost total evacuation of the population—the City of New Orleans has exceeded expectations in population recovery. 1 By the end of 2015, the city had regained nearly 86% of its pre-Katrina population, with nearly 390,000 people calling the city home.1 More than half of neighborhoods have recovered over 90 percent of the population they had before the levees failed.2 Only four neighborhoods have less than half the population they had prior to Katrina; the Lower Ninth Ward, one of the City’s most damaged neighborhoods; and three neighborhoods which include three public housing sites that have been demolished to make way for new mixed–income housing.3 Despite the City’s remarkable population recovery, there are still challenges that remain as we shift our focus from recovery to resilience. This chapter describes the post-World War II demographic and land use trends that shaped the New Orleans of today. This period in New Orleans’ history is part of a larger story of urban decline which lasted through the 1990s and affected all American cities—and the beginning of an urban renaissance that gathered steam in the early 2000s and continues today. New Orleans was part of this story, including the beginnings of urban renaissance, in its own way and based on its own history. While Hurricane Katrina and the failure of the levee system severely impacted the progress of the City, more than 10 years after the storm the City has overcome many challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood, Planning District Six
    Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood Planning District 6 Rebuilding Plan Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood, Planning District Six Introduction Table of Contents Approximately 100 days after Hurricane Katrina Basic assumptions also formed the basis for the Acknowledgements Introduction 2 struck, Motion M-05-592 was unanimously neighborhood rebuilding plan: passed by the City Council of New Orleans. This 1. That a flood protection system will be With grateful appreciation the planning team A. Gentilly Terrace Neighborhood motion ensured that community-based, designed to withstand future catastropic would like to thank all the residents of Location & History 3 neighborhood-by-neighborhood planning would loss from a 1 in 100 year storm and that District 6 who participated in this planning Recovery Vision & Goals 4 be central to decisions associated with the this is a commitment by the federal process and without whose participation this Planning Process 5 recovery of the most devastated areas of New government. plan would not be possible. Neighborhood Concerns 7 Orleans. The City Council was adamant that the people most impacted by the storm would play a 2. That stringent building codes will be Project Directory B. Pre-Hurricane Katrina central role in defining the future of their implemented to further limit wind Neighborhood Existing Conditions 9 communities. Overall, 47 of the 73 damage. City of New Orleans Land-Use and Zoning 9 neighborhoods delineated by the City’s Planning C. Ray Nagin, Mayor Pre-Katrina Demographic Profile 10 Commission have had plans prepared as part of 3. That the basic urban structure of the city Income & Household Characteristics 10 this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoring Claiborne Avenue Alternatives for the Future of Claiborne Avenue
    Restoring Claiborne Avenue Alternatives for the Future of Claiborne Avenue A Report to the Claiborne Corridor Improvement Coalition and Congress for the New Urbanism Prepared by Smart Mobility Inc. and Waggonner & Ball Architects 15 July 2010 CLAIBORNE CORRIDOR IMPROVEMENT COALITION The mission of the Claiborne Corridor Improvement Coalition is to plan and advocate for the transformation of the Claiborne Corridor into a healthy, vibrant boulevard that will not only serve as an anchor for the Corridor’s neighborhoods, but for the whole city of New Orleans. This report is the result of the efforts of the Coalition to gather information and inform the community about the alternatives for the Claiborne Avenue/I‐10 Corridor. The Coalition was formed by NEWCITY Neighborhood Partnerships, a coalition of developers, funders, neighborhood organizations, service providers, churches & faith‐ based groups, schools & universities, and government agencies focused on educational, economic, health, and housing development in the Tremé/Lafitte and Tulane/Gravier neighborhoods. The report has been prepared for the Coalition by the Congress for the New Urbanism, a national leader in promoting walkable, neighborhood‐based development as an alternative to sprawl, with assistance from the National Endowment of the Arts and the Ford Foundation. Members: Vaughn Fauria, NewCorp Inc., Co‐Chair, Claiborne Corridor Improvement Coalition (CCIC) Lisa Amoss, Broad Community Connections Bill Borah, Smart Growth for Louisiana Arianne Cousin, Urban Development Research Center Jack Davis, Smart Growth for Louisiana, Co‐Chair, CCIC Clifton James, Urban Development Research Center, Co‐Chair, CCIC Jim Kelly, Providence Community Housing/Catholic Charities, Co‐Chair, CCIC Nick Roosevelt, NEWCITY Neighborhood Partnership Daniel Samuels, Architect John Norquist, Congress for the New Urbanism Nora Beck, Congress for the New Urbanism Report Prepared for: Consultant Team: Lucy Gibson, P.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Our New Orleans Guide — Probably This
    Our New Orleans Guide — Probably This for a better homo & garden, since 2014. People ask us all the time for recommendations on where to go in New Orleans, so we thought it was about time we made a full guide for all of our absolute favorite spots. These are the places we take our friends whenever we have out of town visitors! This is an incomplete and ever- changing list. Click each link to make sure the recommendation fits your interests, and if you go to an experience listed below—and love it—it would mean the world to us if you let them know we sent you! Yes please do that. If you think your business or a business you love should be on here, email us at [email protected] and weʼll check it out! https://probablythis.com/new-orleans-guide[4/28/19, 8:38:05 PM] Our New Orleans Guide — Probably This In general, as a visitor, your best bet is to stay in these neighborhoods: Lower Garden District, The Warehouse District, The French Quarter, The Marigny, or The Bywater. Airbnb is not available in the French Quarter, and if you do use an AirBnB in this city, please be respectful of the many folks who call these neighborhoods home by not treating your rental as ground zero for partying (we have lots of bars and restaurants for that!). THE CATAHOULA HOTEL (THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT) $175 - $300 / NIGHT A hip and quaint boutique hotel with an amazing rooftop + bar. Great for anyone in search of a relaxing experience in a historic New Orleans property.
    [Show full text]
  • New Orleans: About Face Kari Rose Cesta Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2007 New Orleans: about face Kari Rose Cesta Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Fine Arts Commons Recommended Citation Cesta, Kari Rose, "New Orleans: about face" (2007). LSU Master's Theses. 2764. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2764 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NEW ORLEANS: ABOUT FACE A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Fine Arts In The School of Art by Kari Rose Cesta B.A., Loyola University New Orleans, 2003 August, 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would not have made it this far without all of my former art and design professors and teachers. Special thanks to Beverly Stromme, Robert Fisher, John Taube, Dana Bartelt, Daniela Marx, and Tom Varisco for everything they taught me. Thank you to all of my committee members: Lynne Baggett, Gerald Bower, Wei He, Tom Neff, and Darius Spieth for all your time, input and ideas. I want to extend many thanks to each and every one who took the time to participate in my email survey about New Orleans.
    [Show full text]
  • New Orleans in Downtown Open Space Enhancing
    ENHANCING OPEN SPACE IN DOWNTOWN NEW ORLEANS VISIONS FOR A GREENER DISTRICT 20-21 MARCH, 2014 A TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PANEL REPORT Published August 2014 | New Orleans Urban Land Institute Louisiana 2 Urban Land Institute Louisiana Urban Land Institute Louisiana, a District Council of the Urban Land Institute, has 213 members statewide. ULI is a nonprofit research and education organization established in 1936 with more than 30,000 international members. ULI’s mission is to provide leadership in the responsible use of land and to create and sustain thriving communities worldwide. ULI shares best practices through both practical professional development education programs and ULI’s research and publications. The organization sets the standard for high-quality information on urban planning, real estate development, growth and land use. Downtown Development District The Downtown Development District of New Orleans (DDD) was created by the Louisiana Legislature in 1974 as the nation’s first assessment-based business improvement district (BID) to provide enhanced services in economic development, cleaning and safety. Kurt W. Weigle is President & CEO of the DDD, whose mission is to drive the development of Downtown New Orleans and be the catalyst for a prosperous, stimulating, innovative heart of the Crescent City. The DDD services the area bounded by Iberville Street, the Pontchartrain Expressway, Claiborne Avenue and the Mississippi River. It is governed by an 11-member Board of Commissioners who represent a cross section of the diverse Downtown community. Appointed by local elected officials, our commissioners help guide the policies and programs of the DDD. Acknowledgements ULI Louisiana and the Downtown Development District of New Orleans thank the following supporters of the Enhancing Open Space in Downtown New Orleans - Visions of a Greener District Technical Assistance Panel: • American Institute of Architects New Orleans • American Planning Association Louisiana & Metro New Orleans Section • American Society of Landscape Architects Louisiana Chapter • J.W.
    [Show full text]
  • New Orleans Downtown Transit Center Alternatives Analysis
    NEW ORLEANS DOWNTOWN TRANSIT CENTER ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2020 P Prepared for the: New Orleans Regional Transit Authority Prepared by: WSP USA Inc. NEW ORLEANS DOWNTOWN TRANSIT CENTER ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS | FINAL REPORT 2020 Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction . 1 1.1 Background . 1 1.2 Study Team and Advisors . 1 1.3 Analysis Process . 3 1.4 Project Status . 3 2. Purpose and Need . 4 2.1 Problem Statement . 4 2.2 Purpose . 5 2.3 Need . 5 2.4 Previous Plans and Studies . 6 3. Public and Stakeholder Outreach . 8 3.1 Outreach Plan . 8 3.2 Outreach Activities . 9 4. Existing Conditions . 10 4.1 RTA System . 10 4.2 Bus and Streetcar Stops . 11 4.3 Passenger Amenities . 11 4.4 Ridership Activity . 11 4.5 Transfer Activity . 11 4.6 CBD Employment . 13 4.7 Transit Operations . 13 4.8 Demographics . 13 5. Transit Center Typologies and Features . 24 5.1 Typologies . 24 5.2 Features . 34 5.3 Community Preferences . 40 6. Screening Process . 41 6.1 Tier 1 Screening Process . 41 6.2 Tier 2 Screening Process . 43 7. Tier 1 Alternatives and Screening . 45 7.1 Tier 1 Alternatives . 45 7.2 Tier 1 Screening . 47 8. Tier 2 Alternatives and Screening . 51 8.1 Tier 2 Primary Sites – Initial Layout Concepts . 51 8.2 Tier 2 Primary Sites – Site and Layout Refinements . 59 8.3 Tier 2 Primary Sites – Operating Concepts . 65 8.4 Estimates of Probable Cost . 70 8.5 Tier 2 Screening . 71 8.6 Secondary/Satellite Sites .
    [Show full text]