2011 Annual Report and Accounts Separate Financial Statements Bayernlb

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2011 Annual Report and Accounts Separate Financial Statements Bayernlb Facts | Figures BAYERNLB | 2011 ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS SEPARATE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS BayernLB . 2011 Annual Report and Accounts BayernLB’s financial statements at a glance Income statement (HGB) 1 Jan – 31 Dec 1 Jan – 31 Dec EUR million 2011 2010 Change in % Net interest income 1,611 1,423 13.2 Net commission income 159 158 0.6 Net income from the trading portfolio – 50 157 Administrative expenses – 735 – 765 – 4.0 Operating profit/loss – 97 455 Balance sheet (HGB) EUR million 31 Dec 2011 31 Dec 2010 Change in % Total assets 256,728 279,346 – 8.1 Business volume 293,743 318,961 – 7.9 Credit volume 162,132 175,660 – 7.7 Total deposits 110,840 129,159 – 14.2 Securitised liabilities 79,019 87,215 – 9.4 Reported equity 19,181 20,441 – 6.2 Banking supervisory ratios under the German Banking Act (KWG) EUR billion 31 Dec 2011 31 Dec 2010 Change in % Core capital 12.5 13.1 – 4.6 Own funds 17.9 18.8 – 4.8 Risk positions under the Solvency Ordinance 85.8 94.0 – 8.7 Core capital ratio 14.6% 13.9% 0.7 pp1 Own funds ratio (overall ratio) 20.8% 20.0% 0.8 pp1 1 Percentage points Employees EUR million 31 Dec 2011 31 Dec 2010 Change in % Number of employees 4,139 4,184 – 1.1 ›› 2 Contents BayernLB . 2011 Annual Report and Accounts ›› Contents 3 4 Report by the Board of Administration 10 Management report 12 Overview 19 Financial position and performance 25 Events after the end of the reporting period 26 Outlook 29 Risk report 54 Financial statements 56 Balance sheet 60 Income statement 62 Notes 109 Responsibility statement by the Board of Management 110 Auditor’s Report 112 Committees and advisory boards 114 General Meeting 115 Board of Administration 116 Audit Committee 116 Risk Committee 117 Trustees 117 Savings Bank Advisory Council 118 Economic Advisory Council 122 Locations and addresses BayernLB . 2011 Annual Report and Accounts ›› 4 Report by the Board of Administration BayernLB . 2011 Annual Report and Accounts ›› Report by the Board of Administration 5 BayernLB . 2011 Annual Report and Accounts ›› 6 Report by the Board of Administration Due to the persistently difficult and volatile market environment for banks, the deterioration in the European sovereign debt crisis and extraordinary impact on earnings from government inter- ference in Germany and Hungary (e.g. the restructuring law, bank levy and Foreign Currency Loan Repayment Law), 2011 was another very challenging year for BayernLB. Nevertheless, further pro- gress was made in implementing the Board of Administration-approved corporate strategy, and customer-driven business was buoyant. In its home market, BayernLB carved out a clear position for itself and further strengthened and expanded its role as a lender to companies in Bavaria and the rest of Germany. Systematically implementing the new business model by focusing on serving customers formed the highest strategic priority for the Board of Management and Board of Administration. The Board of Administration regularly monitored the Board of Management and advised it on the management of the business throughout the course of the year. The Board of Management provided the Board of Administration and the Audit and Risk Committees formed from among its members with regular, up-to-date and comprehensive verbal and written reports on the Bank’s business policy and general issues related to corporate planning, particularly financial, invest- ment and human resource planning. The Board of Management also provided the Board of Administration with regular, comprehensive and up-to-date information on the Bank’s perfor- mance, focusing especially on earnings, expenses, risks, liquidity and capital status, legal and business relations with affiliated companies, and material events and business transactions, particularly in the case of affiliated companies. The Board of Management also kept the Board of Administration abreast of the ongoing state-aid proceedings and attendant negotiations with the EU Commission. The two boards held in-depth discussions with each other on the potential impact of the proceedings on the Bank’s business policy. The Board of Administration also looked at the plethora of changes to the legal and regulatory framework and their potential impact on BayernLB and its subsidiaries. Items on the agenda included bank levies in Germany and Hungary, the restructuring law, and the European Banking Authority’s stress test. In the second half of the year, the Board of Administration devoted much of its attention to the macro-economic situation in Hungary and the actions taken by the govern- ment there. The negative impact of extraordinary items resulting from the Foreign Currency Loan Repayment Law and the Hungarian government’s bank levy – a tax which is not assessed on the basis of earnings – made a capital increase necessary for MKB Bank Zrt. by 31 March 2012. In an extraordinary meeting in December 2011, the Board of Administration gave its approval for the Board of Management to provide the necessary funds to cover MKB’s capital requirements as soon as the EU Commission agrees. Over the course of the year ten meetings were chaired by Mr Fahrenschon, who stepped down on 3 November 2011, and three by his successor Dr Söder. The chairmen of both the Audit Committee and Risk Committee regularly reported on the com- mittees’ work to a full session of the Board of Administration. BayernLB . 2011 Annual Report and Accounts ›› Report by the Board of Administration 7 Under its chairman Dr Klaus von Lindeiner-Wildau, the principal duties of the Audit Committee are to monitor the accounting process and the effectiveness of the internal control system, the internal auditing system, the system used for risk management and the audit of the annual finan- cial statements and of the consolidated financial statements, and to review and monitor the inde- pendence of the auditors, particularly the additional services performed by the auditors for the Bank. The Board of Administration assigned additional duties to the Audit Committee. During the year, for example, the Audit Committee received updates on the work of Internal Audit and Com- pliance. It also considered assessments on the threats from money laundering and financial crime and what the focuses of the audit of the 2011 Annual Report should be as permitted by Section 30 of the German Banking Act. The Audit Committee played a full role in the process to select the new auditors for the 2012 annual financial statements relating to the Bank, Group, BayernLabo and LBS Bayern. The Audit Committee and Board of Administration both recommended appointing Deloitte & Touche GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft to be the auditors for 2012, and this was confirmed in a resolution by the General Meeting. The Audit Committee held four meetings in 2011. Under its chairman Alexander Mettenheimer, the Risk Committee has been involved in all major issues relating to the risk strategy established by the Board of Management and to BayernLB’s risk situation at both the Group and Bank level. It discussed and approved the risk and sub-portfolio strategies defined by the Board of Management Group-wide, discussed the reports by the Board of Management on BayernLB’s performance in relation to the risk situation (particularly risk- bearing capacity), and decided on all loans requiring approval by the Board of Administration. In 2011 the Risk Committee considered the progress of the Restructuring Unit (particularly the ABS portfolio), the analysis of the impact of Basel III and the implementation status of the third amendment to the MaRisk regulations at BayernLB. Other areas it looked at in detail included the European sovereign debt crisis and its impact on the banking sector in general and on the Bank in particular. The Risk Committee held six meetings in 2011. The chairman of the Board of Management promptly informed the chairman and deputy chairmen of the Board of Administration about any events that were of material significance in assessing the Bank’s situation and performance. The regulatory requirements governing the reporting by the Board of Management of irregularities identified by Internal Audit were met. At their various meetings the Board of Administration, Audit Committee and Risk Committee passed the resolutions required by law and under the Statutes and the Rules of Procedure of the respective committees. In addition, important issues and pending decisions were also discussed in regular meetings between the chairmen of the Board of Administration and Board of Manage- ment. Meetings were held both in person and in the form of telephone conferences. When necessary, resolutions were also passed between meetings using a circulation procedure. BayernLB . 2011 Annual Report and Accounts ›› 8 Corporate governance The BayernLB Corporate Governance Principles set out the regulations on corporate management and supervision that apply to BayernLB on the basis of binding and in-house regulations. In its meeting of 23 January 2012, the Board of Administration discussed compliance with these corporate governance principles in 2011. It agreed with the Board of Management that it was aware of no evidence that these principles had not been observed. The General Meeting passed a resolution to the same effect. In moving from the old Landesbank model to become a customer-focused commercial bank, BayernLB has opted to make changes so that its corporate governance is more commercially orientated. Board members Various changes occurred in the composition of the Board of Administration in 2011. Mr Georg Fahrenschon ceased to be a member of the Board of Administration on 3 November when he stepped down as the Bavarian Finance Minister. He was succeeded as chairman by Dr Markus Söder, the new Bavarian Finance Minister. Mr Diethard Irrgang ceased to be a member of the Board of Administration on 15 August 2011 after a new employee representative was chosen in the Staff Council elections.
Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Ahern, Bertie, 54 Bank of America: Allied Irish Bank, 55, 56, 57, 61, acquisitions, 85–86, 88, 95, 127 62, 94 bad banks, 92–93 Almunia, Joaquín, 41, 42, 43, 46 capital ratio, 90, 91 Alpert, Daniel, 102, 123 Countrywide Financial, acquisition of, 85, Alwaleed bin Tahal, Prince, 83–84 86 American Bankers Association, 89 credit rating uplift, 6, 9, 86 Andersen, Gunnar T., 70, 71 derivative holdings, 127, 128 Anglo Irish Bank: Europe, exposure to, 154 Burton and, 57 job cuts, 119 capital injections by government, 62 Merrill Lynch, acquisition of, 85–86, 88, condition of, 56, 57 95 developers, loans to, 54–55 mortgage-backed securities, 122, 123, winding down of, 58, 61, 75, 135 154 Arion Banki, 75–76 mortgage servicing, 115, 116, 119, 121 Árnason, Árni Páll, 73, 75 price-to-book ratio, 93–94 Assets, synthetic, 35–36, 39, 41 rescue of, 99 Austerity measures: Safe Banking Act and, 107 Greece, 49–50 second liens and revolving credit, 115, Ireland, 49–50, 52–53, 66 116 PIGS (Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and size of, 146 Spain), 27–28, 73 subsidiaries, 94–95 TARP fund repayment, 100 Bad banks, 92–93 Bank of Ireland, 55, 56, 57, 61, 62, 139 Bair, Sheila. See also Federal Deposit Bank of Japan, 18, 19 Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Bank of New York Mellon, 103 bank-holding companies, 98 Bank of Spain, 30 bank liabilities blanket guarantee proposal, Bank One, 108 81–82, 83 Barclays, 111, 141 banks, return of cash by, 92 Barroso, José Manuel, 58, 59 capital rules, 90 Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, derivatives, 127–128 28, 44, 140–141 Dodd-Frank
    [Show full text]
  • [ Bayernlb | Group Financial Report ] 30 September 2010
    [ BayernLB | Group Financial report ] 30 September 2010 < 2 [ Contents ] b ayernl . Group Financial report – 30 September 2010 ›› Contents 3 > 4 Foreword 6 BayernLB Group at a glance as at 30 September 2010 8 Business performance as at 30 September 2010 8 Earnings 10 Banking supervisory capital and ratios 10 Net assets and financial position 12 BayernLB in a process of transformation 13 Segment reporting 17 Outlook 18 Administrative bodies of BayernLB n ote: this Group financial report as at 30 September 2010 has been prepared with great care. the information is presented voluntarily for our customers and the public. the report does not contain all the information and data required under iaS 34 (interim Financial reporting) nor does it fully comply with the disclosure and valuation standards of iFrS. the results have not been audited or reviewed for correctness. b ayernl . Group Financial report – 30 September 2010 < 4 Foreword i n the first nine months of 2010, bayernlb posted earnings before taxes of eur 669 million. this was an increase of four percent on the previous year period and is therefore in line with our forecasts. contributing to this with satisfactory results in all segments was the third quarter of 2010, which closed with earnings before taxes of eur 115 million and operating earnings of eur 125 million. our regained earnings power puts us in a position to absorb even one-off charges, such as the high banking levy in Hungary (eur 38 million) and charges for writing down the present value of our hybrid capital instruments (eur 81 million).
    [Show full text]
  • Fitch Affirms Helaba's, Bayernlb's and HVB's Public Sector Pfandbriefe at 'AAA', Outlook Stable
    12/4/2020 Fitch Affirms Helaba's, BayernLB's and HVB's Public Sector Pfandbriefe at 'AAA', Outlook Stable RATING ACTION COMMENTARY Fitch Afrms Helaba's, BayernLB's and HVB's Public Sector Pfandbriefe at 'AAA', Outlook Stable Thu 03 Dec, 2020 - 2:39 PM ET Fitch Ratings - Frankfurt am Main - 03 Dec 2020: Fitch Ratings has afrmed Landesbank Hessen-Thueringen Girozentrale's (Helaba; A+/Negative/F1+), Bayerische Landesbank's (BayernLB; A-/Negative/F1) and UniCredit Bank AG's (HVB; BBB/Negative/F2) public sector Pfandbriefe at 'AAA' with Stable Outlooks. The afrmations follow the update of Fitch's Covered Bonds and CDOs Public Entities Asset Analysis Criteria published on 16 October 2020. KEY RATING DRIVERS The 'AAA' rating of Helaba's public sector Pfandbriefe is based on the bank's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) of 'A+', the various uplifts above the IDR granted to the programme and the overcollaterialisation (OC) protection for Pfandbriefe holders. The public sector Pfandbriefe are rated four notches above the bank's Long-Term IDR. This is out of a maximum achievable uplift of nine notches, consisting of a resolution uplift of two notches, a payment continuity uplift (PCU) of ve notches and a recovery uplift of two notches. As the 'AAA' rating is based on a recovery only basis we did not test for timely payments in our cash ow model. https://www.fitchratings.com/research/structured-finance/covered-bonds/fitch-affirms-helaba-s-bayernlb-hvb-public-sector-pfandbriefe-at-aaa-outl… 1/11 12/4/2020 Fitch Affirms Helaba's, BayernLB's and HVB's Public Sector Pfandbriefe at 'AAA', Outlook Stable The 'AAA' rating of BayernLB's public sector Pfandbriefe is based on the bank's Long- Term IDR of 'A-' and the various uplifts above the IDR granted to the programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Fitch Places German and Austrian Banks Under Criteria Observation
    3/4/2020 Press Release Fitch Places German and Austrian Banks Under Criteria Observation Fitch Ratings - Frankfurt am Main - 04 March 2020: Fitch Ratings has placed Austrian and German banks' Long-Term (LT) Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs), Derivative Counterparty Ratings (DCR), debt ratings and Deposit Ratings under criteria observation (UCO). The rating actions follow the publication on 28 February 2020 of Fitch's updated bank and non-bank financial institution rating criteria that include changes to the way the agency notches senior and junior ratings from their IDR or Viability Rating (VR) anchors. The updated criteria better reflect continuing developments in bank resolution, notably developments in bank resolution plans, the build-up of 'bail-in' debt buffers that protect more senior creditors and their implication for default risk and recovery prospects for senior and junior liability classes. Fitch has also reduced the base case notching for non-performance on additional tier 1 (AT1) instruments, narrowing the relative gap between Tier 2 and AT1 instruments where Fitch has reappraised its baseline treatment of non- performance risk. Ratings designated as being UCO will be reviewed and resolved as soon as practical and in any case within six months. Key Rating Drivers Fitch has placed UCO the IDRs, DCRs, senior debt, deposit, subordinated debt and hybrid debt ratings of the various issuers as outlined in the rating sensitivities section below. The rating actions reflect the possibility that these ratings will be upgraded or downgraded as a result of the publication of our new Bank Rating Criteria on 28 February 2020, as outlined in more detail in the Rating Sensitivities section of this rating action commentary.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayernlb Date: 27/04/2020 Issue Date: 09-04-2020 Maturity Date: 09-10-2030 Tenor: 10.5
    Green Bond Fact Sheet BayernLB Date: 27/04/2020 Issue date: 09-04-2020 Maturity date: 09-10-2030 Tenor: 10.5 Issuer name BayernLB Amount issued EUR50m/USD56m Country of risk Germany CBI Database Included Issuer type1 Government-Backed Bond type Sr Non Preferred Entity Green bond framework Link to Framework Second party opinion ISS-oekom Certification Standard Not certified Assurance report N/A Certification verifier N/A Green bond rating N/A Use of Proceeds ☒ Energy ☒ Solar ☐ Tidal ☐ Energy storage ☒ Onshore wind ☐ Biofuels ☐ Energy performance ☒ Offshore wind ☐ Bioenergy ☐ Infrastructure ☐ Geothermal ☐ District heating ☐ Industry: components ☐ Hydro ☐ Electricity grid ☐ Adaptation & resilience ☒ Buildings ☒ Certified Buildings ☐ Water performance ☐ Industry: components ☐ HVAC systems ☐ Energy storage/meters ☐ Adaptation & resilience ☒ Energy ☐ Other energy related performance ☒ Transport ☐ Electric vehicles ☐ Freight rolling stock ☐ Transport logistics ☐ Low emission ☐ Coach / public bus ☒ Infrastructure vehicles ☐ Bicycle infrastructure ☐ Industry: components ☐ Bus rapid transit ☐ Energy performance ☐ Adaptation & resilience ☒ Passenger trains ☒ Urban rail ☐ Water & wastewater ☐ Water distribution ☐ Storm water mgmt ☐ Infrastructure ☐ Water treatment ☐ Flood protection ☐ Industry: components ☐ Wastewater ☐ Desalinisation plants ☐ Adaptation & resilience treatment ☐ Erosion control ☐ Water storage ☐ Energy performance ☐ Waste management ☐ Recycling ☐ Landfill, energy capture ☐ Waste to energy ☐ Waste prevention ☐ Energy performance ☐
    [Show full text]
  • Bayerische Landesbank
    13 May 2013 Bayerische Landesbank Registration Document pursuant to Art. 5(3) of Directive 2003/71/EC, as amended by Directive 2010/73/EU, (the "Directive") and Art. 8(3) of the Luxembourg Prospectus law on prospectuses for securities (Loi relative aux prospectus pour valeurs mobilières, the "Luxembourg Prospectus Law") in combination with Art. 14 of the Commission Regulation (EC) No 809/2004 This registration document (the "Registration Document") has been approved pursuant to Art. 7(1) of the Luxembourg Prospectus Law by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (the "CSSF") of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. By approving this Registration Document, the CSSF shall give no undertaking as to the economic or financial opportuneness of the transaction or the quality and solvency of the issuer pursuant to Art. 7(7) of the Luxembourg Prospectus Law. It has been made available to the public on the date of its approval by publication in an electronic form on the website of Bayerische Landesbank (www.bayernlb.de) and on the website of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (www.bourse.lu). Upon request, Bayerische Landesbank will provide, free of charge, a paper copy of this Registration Document to any interested person. The same publication arrangements apply in relation to any prospectus or base prospectus of which this Registration Document is a constituent part and to any document incorporated herein or therein by reference. This Registration Document is valid for a period of twelve months from the date of its approval. It reflects the status as of the date of its approval and will be updated in accordance with the provisions of the Directive and the provisions of any applicable national laws implementing the Directive.
    [Show full text]
  • Der Alp(En)Traum a Für Finanzinvestoren So Spekta- Kulär Wie Für Andere Manager Das Morgendliche Binden Der Krawatte
    ngebote, reicher zu werden, sind Der Alp(en)traum A für Finanzinvestoren so spekta- kulär wie für andere Manager das morgendliche Binden der Krawatte. Auch ein Londoner Großanleger erwar- BAYERNLB Habgier, Unfähigkeit und tete keine Sensationen, als sich Ende November 2006 Besuch ankündigte. Größenwahn haben aus der Landesbank Ein gewisser Tilo Berlin (51), ein am Wörthersee lebender Vermögensverwal- einen Fall für Staatsanwälte gemacht. ter, bot dem Mann, der seinen Namen Und schon tauchen neue, bisher lieber für sich behalten will, einen Anteil an der Hypo Alpe Adria an. Die Kärnte- unbekannte Risiken auf – eine Abrechnung. ner Bank brauche Eigenkapital; für rund 250 Millionen Euro seien knapp 10 Pro- zent zu haben. Berlin wollte einsteigen, später sogar auf 25 Prozent aufstocken. Aber für ihn allein war die Sache zu groß. Er brauchte Ko-Investoren. Berlin brachte einen Überraschungs- gast mit: Wolfgang Kulterer (56), damals 60 managermagazin 3/2010 Unternehmen BayernLB Weiß-blaue Affäre: 2007 kauften die früheren BayernLB-Manager Schmidt und Kemmer, unterstützt von Ministerpräsident Stoiber, die Hypo-Alpe-Adria-Bank. Der Deal, eingefädelt von Vermögensverwalter Berlin und dem damaligen Kärntner Landeshauptmann Haider (v. l. n. r.), beschäftigt heute die Staatsanwälte. FOTOS: [M] CHRISTOF STACHE / AP, UWE LEIN HOFFMANN IMAGO, GERT EGGENBERGER PA DPA, ROMAN BABIRAD BABIRADPICTURE Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender und zuvor ihn. Die Bank stecke voller Giftmüll. nuar 2007 ernsthaft über einen Einstieg lange Vorstandschef der Hypo Alpe Er sagte ab. Hätte er investiert, hätte er der Bayern in Kärnten redeten. Berlins Äu- Adria. Kulterer sei „nicht in offizieller seinen Einsatz locker verdoppeln kön- ßerungen in London deuten jedoch dar - Funktion“ angereist, sagte Berlin, aber er nen.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive to the Test
    KEY POINTS PUTTING THE AND BANK RESOLUTION RECOVERY DIRECTIVE THE TEST TO BayernLB and Austria are locked in a battle over the winding-down of Hypo-Alpe-Adria Feature Bank, with BayernLB one of the largest creditors “bailed in” under a new special law which cancels sub-sovereign guarantees. A complaint by BayernLB to the Austrian Constitutional Court may lead to a reference to the CJEU over interpretation of the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive. There are strong arguments that the new law fails to adhere to key restrictions on use of the bail-in tool. Interpretation of Arts 43 and 44 of the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive is likely to be crucial to determining the legality of cancelling sub-sovereign guarantees as part of a bail-in. Authors Hodge Malek QC and James Potts Putting the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive to the test This article examines a dispute over one of the most controversial European bank turing obligations until 2019; court bail-ins to date, of Hypo-Alpe-Adria Bank, and considers how the CJEU is likely to proceedings will determine whether they interpret the bail-in powers in the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive. qualify as restructuring obligations, in which case they will cease to exist; any liquidation profits to be distributed The likelihood of the Court of Justice provide welcome insight on the limits of proportionately to creditors of restruc- ■of the European Union (CJEU) the bail-in powers. turing obligations and then to share- being required to rule on EU bail-in holders, but without any regard to the legislation has significantly increased, as FEDERAL LAW ON REMEDIAL guarantees.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayernlb 2015 Annual Report and Accounts
    BayernLB 2015 Annual Report and Accounts Consolidated financial statements BayernLB Group at a glance Income statement (IFRS) 1 Jan – 31 Dec 1 Jan – 31 Dec EUR million 2015 2014 Change in % Net interest income 1,612 1,671 – 3.5 Risk provisions in the credit business – 264 – 1,498 – 82.4 Net interest income after risk provisions 1,348 173 > 100 Net commission income 258 249 3.4 Gains or losses on fair value measurement – 62 – 25 > 100 Gains or losses on hedge accounting – 24 – 70 – 65.9 Gains or losses on financial investments 286 419 – 31.8 Administrative expenses – 1,168 – 1,171 – 0.3 Expenses for the bank levy and deposit guarantee scheme – 90 – 4 > 100 Other income and expenses 102 114 – 9.9 Gains or losses on restructuring – 10 – 33 – 67.8 Profit/loss before taxes 640 – 348 – Income taxes – 150 99 – Gains or losses on discontinued operations 0 – 1,070 – Profit/loss after taxes 490 – 1,320 – Cost/income ratio (CIR) 53.8% 49.7% 4.1 pp1 Return on equity (RoE) 5.8% – 2.6% 8.5 pp1 Balance sheet (IFRS) EUR million 31 Dec 2015 31 Dec 2014 Change in % Total assets 215,711 232,124 – 7.1 Business volume 252,466 272,834 – 7.5 Credit volume 175,428 182,584 – 3.9 Total deposits 146,390 145,773 0.4 Securitised liabilities 34,840 44,285 – 21.3 Subordinated capital 4,719 4,722 – Equity 11,063 11,789 – 6.2 Banking supervisory capital and ratios under CRR/CRD IV (after close of year) EUR million 31 Dec 2015 31 Dec 2014 Change in % Common Equity Tier 1 capital (CET 1 capital) 10,537 9,822 7.3 Own funds 12,214 11,715 4.3 Total RWA 69,606 76,616 – 9.1 CET 1 ratio 15.1% 12.8% 2.3 pp1 CET 1 ratio (fully loaded) 12.0% 10.2% 1.8 pp1 Total capital ratio 17.6% 15.3% 2.3 pp1 Employees 31 Dec 2015 31 Dec 2014 Change in % Number of employees 7,082 6,842 3.5 Current ratings Long-term Short-term Pfandbriefs2 Fitch Ratings A – F1 AAA Moody’s Investors Service A2 P –1 Aaa 1 Percentage points 2 Applies to public Pfandbriefs and mortgage Pfandbriefs Corporate profile BayernLB is one of Germany’s leading commercial banks and headquartered in one of Europe’s strongest economic regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement on Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking
    Statement on Slavery and Human Trafficking 2017 under the UK Modern Slavery Act This Statement is made under Section 54 of the UK's Modern Slavery Act 2015 (the "Act") and sets out the steps that Bayerische Landesbank ("BayernLB") takes to ensure that slavery and human trafficking do not occur in any of its supply chains or any part of its business. It is made in respect of the bank’s activities during its 2017 financial year. Intent and purpose BayernLB supports the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 and its objective to eradicate all forms of modern slavery and human trafficking. BayernLB wants to be recognised as a trusted financial partner acting in accordance with its core values, while taking into account internationally recognised principles for environmental protection, human and labour rights, business ethics and anti-corruption. This includes improving business practices to combat modern slavery. Corporate Structure and Business conducted out of the London Branch BayernLB, a German bank established under public law, has its headquarters in Munich. Although BayernLB’s regional focus is on Bavaria and Germany, it also supports its customers in their world-wide activities. In the United Kingdom, the bank has a branch, serving mainly German businesses and their development in the United Kingdom. In other countries, there are branches in Milan, Paris and New York, as well as a representative office in Moscow. In Germany, in addition to its headquarters in Munich, BayernLB has a branch in Nuremberg and offices in Berlin, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg and Stuttgart. Corporate Governance Principles, Code of Conduct and Sustainability Policy The bank’s Corporate Governance Principles, the Code of Conduct and the Sustainability Policy together make up the normative foundations of BayernLB.
    [Show full text]
  • Geschäftsbericht 2010 Konzernabschluss Bayernlb | Group
    i f a f cts | gures BayernLB | GeschäftsberichtGroup financial r 2010eport f Kionzernabschlussrst quarter of 2011 Contents BayernLB . Group Financial Report – First quarter of 2011 ›› Contents f 4 oreword 6 bayernlb Group – the first quarter of 2011 at a glance 7 business performance in the first quarter of 2011 7 Earnings 2|3 9 Banking supervisory capital and ratios 9 Net assets and financial position 11 Segment reporting 15 Outlook c16 ommittees of bayernlb 18 segment definitions n ote: This Group financial report as at 31 March 2011 has been prepared with great care. The information is presented voluntarily for our customers and the public. The report does not contain all the information and data required under IAS 34 (Interim Financial Reporting) nor does it fully comply with the disclosure and valuation standards of IFRS. The results have not been audited or reviewed for correctness. BayernLB . Group Financial Report – First quarter of 2011 Foreword Ladies and Gentlemen, BayernLB has kicked off financial year 2011 by continuing its series of satisfactory quarterly results. In the first three months of the current financial year, the BayernLB Group generated higher-than-forecast earnings before taxes of EUR 149 million. Compared to the Q1 2010 figure of EUR 498 million, which was considerably inflated by a strong tailwind from the capital markets and the resulting increase in valuations, the Bank has thus posted normalised and good quality results. Earnings before taxes for the quarter were generated solely from activities with corporate, retail and real estate customers, as well as the savings banks and the public sector, which the new BayernLB has defined as its core business.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayernlb Holding AG (Bayerische Landesbank)
    BayernLB Holding AG (Bayerische Landesbank) Public Section of 2013 §165(d) Tailored Resolution Plan Page | 1 Public Section a. Introduction To promote financial stability, Section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and its implementing rules (collectively, the “Rule”) 1 require, among other things, any company covered by section 165(d) to periodically submit to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve” or the “Board”) a plan for such company’s rapid and orderly resolution in the event of material financial distress or failure. Included in Covered Companies are foreign-based covered companies, which are defined in the Rule as “any covered company that is not incorporated or organized under the laws of the United States.” BayernLB Holding AG (“BayernLB” or the “Bank”) wholly owns Bayerische Landesbank, which itself has more than $50 billion in consolidated global assets, and operates a New York Branch (the “Branch”). Therefore, and as more fully explained below, BayernLB is considered a “Covered Company” under the Rule and must file this Resolution Plan with the Federal Reserve. Under the requirements of the Rule, Covered Companies are required to assess their U.S. banking operations for the presence of Material Entities,2 Critical Operations,3 and Core Business Lines.4 BayernLB determined that its U.S. operations have no Material Entities, Critical Operations, or Core Business Lines as defined in the Rule. b. Background BayernLB is a large commercial bank that is majority-owned by the Free State of Bavaria (Freistaat Bayern).
    [Show full text]