i LLB Architects
Lerner Ladds Bartels 161 Exchange St. 112 South St. Pawtucket, RI 02860 / Boston, MA 02111
401.421.7715 617.433.7715 www.LLBarch.com
Town of Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project Qaulifications and Proposal for Architectural / Design Services October 10, 2013
p t u q 1 Introduction 2 Qualification Statement History 5 Scope of Services / Project Approach Approach to the Work Understanding the Existing Planning for the Future Illustrative Examples Contributing to the Discourse 10 Staffing Plan Greg Smolley, AIA, AICP, REFP, LEED AP Kathleen A. Bartels, AIA, LEED AP Aimee G. Lombardo, AIA, LEED AP BD+C Mark A. Hallee, AIA Subconsultants 15 Specialized Expertise / Similar Projects and References Middletown Public Schools Facilities Utilization Study Groton Public Schools Pre K - 12 Master Planning Study Westerly Elementary Schools Facilities Study The Friendship School Tiverton Elementary School Facilities Comprehensive Study 27 Litigation
28 Schedule of Fees
30 Appendix Subconsultant Resumes 1 LLB Architects
2 Introduction
October 10, 2013 Dear Mayor Rodolico, Chairman McIntyre, and members of the Permanent Municipal Building Committee, Town of Ledyard Mayor’s Office 741 Colonel Ledyard Hwy. These are exciting times for municipalities and public education. The Ledyard, CT 06339 established approach to K -12 learning is being challenged by the needs Re: of an increasingly connected and interactive world. Many of our municipal Qualifications and Proposal for Architectural / buildings are in need of repair or replacement, yet budgets are still feeling Design Services for the Ledyard School Facilities the strain of the recession. The need for a realistic, fact-based approach Improvement Plan Project to facilities planning has never been more important than it is today. LLB Architects' combination of innovative planning, expertise in educational planning, and experience working with dozens of schools and municipali- ties will lead the Town of Ledyard on a successful path.
The effectiveness of a facilities plan is established by the individual contri- butions to the plan, and is evident in the continuing applicability of the plan as time moves along. Our team includes professionals recognized as leaders in educational planning, technology, lighting, mechanical systems, and security. Many of the individuals on our project team have worked to- gether for more than 15 years. Their experience provides our clients with knowledge gained on projects in several of Connecticut school districts.
LLB Architects is an architectural practice built upon a distinct project ap- proach developed through a comprehensive working relationship with our clients. With proven experience in innovative educational projects and master planning studies, we have the horsepower of a large firm yet the personal attention of a small firm that we think is critical for Ledyard’s School Facilities Improvement Plan Project.
We are thrilled by the prospect of establishing a relationship with the Town of Ledyard. We consider it a unique privilege to be part of the plan- ning of a town's development as its leaders strive to enhance the services it provides to current and future residents. We appreciate your consider- ation and greatly welcome the opportunity to discuss your hopes for this project.
Sincerely yours,
Greg Smolley, AIA, AICP, REFP, LEED AP Principal-in-Charge [email protected]
p t u q 2 Qualifications and Proposal for Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project
3 Qualification Statement
Location of principal office 161 Exchange St. Pawtucket, RI 02860
Project management branch office 112 South St. Boston, MA 02111
Length of Time in Business Established for 77 years Incorporated for 37 years
Firm ownership structure Incorporated and equally owned by two firm principals
As a multidisciplinary firm, LLB LLB Architects, formerly Lerner Ladds Bartels, Architects provides clients with an is an architectural practice built upon a distinct exceptional depth of understand- ing and a full range of expertise. project approach defined through comprehensive We have an extensive portfolio relationships with our clients. Since our founding illustrating our great depth of experience in many project types. in 1936, a commitment to responsive and Our diverse practice includes educa- thoughtful design, integrated project process, tional projects like student centers, administrative offices, classrooms and New England practicality have remained our and learning environments, spe- primary principles. cialized laboratories, dormitories, auditoriums and performing arts spaces, and recreational facilities. The balance of our practice includes municipal buildings such as town halls, public libraries, senior centers, government offices; private residences and housing; commercial spaces for corporate offices, retail environments, and hotel developments; and reli- gious buildings. Our expertise encompasses not only new building design, but also renovations, expansions, historic preservation, adaptive reuse, ex- terior restorations, interior design, graphic design, feasibility studies, and facility audits. By offering such a wide scope of services, we have better coordination and control over projects, helping to bring an entire project together united by a singular point of view. 3 LLB Architects
p Acting as architect and developer, LLB Architects converted the former Rhode Island History Cardboard Company complex - constructed in 1880 - into the Design Exchange, a vibrant Samuel Lerner, a structural engineer and professor at Brown University, community of designers and artisans working founded the firm in 1936 as an engineering practice in his hometown of collaboratively toward the future of the cre- Providence. His son, Steven L. Lerner, AIA, became a principal in 1976 upon ative industry. his architectural registration and the firm was incorporated as Lerner As- sociates to reflect the multidisciplinary practice. Ten years later, the firm moved into a stately Victorian house on Hope Street, while focusing on residential projects, interior design, and historic renovations.
Christian J. Ladds, AIA, LEED AP, a member of the firm since 1984, became a partner in 1990 and the firm name changed to Lerner Ladds Architects. The firm received major commissions through the 90s that continued a trend to multi–faceted civic and institutional work in addition to its port- folio of residential and commercial projects.
Kathleen A. Bartels, AIA, LEED AP became a partner after four years at the firm, and the name was changed to Lerner | Ladds + Bartels. The growth of new partners reflects the truly additive nature of the process that has seen the firm evolve from its roots as a respected engineering firm to one of the premier architecture firms in Rhode Island.
R. Drayton Fair, AIA, ALA, LEED AP joined the firm as a principal in 2003, bringing with him over 20 years of public and institutional experience with an expertise in library design and Massachusetts public work.
Principal Greg Smolley, AIA, AICP, REFP, LEED AP joined the firm in 2013 with years of experience in public, private, and charter schools from K-12 that span the Northeast region. He also has experience within planning and legislative areas of the profession that have contributed to his cost- effective, creative, and well-executed architectural approach.
Senior associates Suzanne diSalvo, Assoc. AIA, LEED AP; Aimee Lombardo, AIA, LEED AP; Mark Hallee, AIA; along with associate J.B. Eric Smith, LEED AP have been instrumental in the continued growth of the firm, leading the development of numerous award-winning projects. They are sup- ported by a group of young architecture professionals, fostered through training, peer sharing, and mentorship, and able to advance to the highest levels of the profession.
In 2011, the firm upsized to the Design Exchange in Pawtucket, leading the adaptive reuse building as developer, and streamlined our name to LLB Architects, honoring the past and emphasizing our profession. We’ve also established a project management office in Boston to better service our clients in the Greater Boston region and the Commonwealth of Massa- chusetts. With our new name and recent relocation, we’re excited for the next step in our future and evolution.
p t u q 4 Qualifications and Proposal for Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project 5 LLB Architects
4 / 10 Scope of Services / Project Approach
One of the underlying facts of a A problem well stated is a problem half solved. facilities or master planning study is that some of the information need- - John Dewey ed exists, while some is speculative or must be projected. Since it is easy to gather, quantify, and understand the existing, relative to the more difficult task of qualifying and projecting the future needs or options, we find it helpful to develop a strong foundation of knowledge and then concentrate on possibilities of the future. We’ve assembled a team of tal- ented, experienced, and financially solid consultants, many of whom have completed dozens of school projects with us. Our project team includes individuals with specialties in education, communications, environmental psychology, urban planning, all aspects of K- 12 architecture, engineer- ing, interior design, graphic design, educational technology requirements, and the selection of furniture for educational environments. Our team will utilize the knowledge we’ve gained through the numerous success- ful feasibility studies and facilities utilization studies we’ve completed for districts throughout New England to provide the level of engagement and understanding needed to position Ledyard Public Schools to move forward to a successful future. Approach to the Work Greg Smolley will serve as the Principal in Charge and Aimee Lombardo will be the Project Manager. They will be joined by Consulting Principal Kathy Bartels and Project Designer Mark Hallee. Greg will oversee the entire project team from beginning to end and will lead the overall effort. Aimee will direct the day to day activities of the team and consultants and will assure that paperwork is completed properly and in a timely manner. This approach allows us to work concurrently on a number of fronts to quickly gather information that will allow an informed discussion of the options and avenues available to the district.
Our first task will be to work with the district to further our understanding of the project scope, schedule, and milestones. We’ll then develop an ac- ceptable outline for reporting our findings, and this will become an inte- gral part of the feasibility study. Clear, concise, and timely communication is key to a successful project. Establishment of a culture of communication at the start makes it part of the project throughout. Understanding the Existing The team will assemble any reports and other information that is avail- t Northeast Academy in Groton, CT able; the recently completed enrollment projections, past expenditures for building upkeep, proposed and adopted capital improvement plans, re- cent work on the buildings, and similar materials are all of interest at this
p t u q 6 Qualifications and Proposal for Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project
point. We’ll review the previous studies and look to confirm any conclu- sions through research, site visits, and conversations with the appropriate individuals. It is the intent of this effort to fill in any missing information, explore more fully the potential for use of particular buildings or sites, and to understand how the existing schools and systems function relative to the desires of the district.
At LLB Architects, we’ve refined a process by which we assess the physi- cal aspects of a building in a manner that captures relevant information and photos which are connected to a BIM model of the building. All of our consultants gather their information on the same platform and all of the input is coordinated to create a dynamic base to increase everyone’s knowledge of the building. Whether for a campus of more than thirty buildings and almost two million square feet or for a single building, our approach provides the entire project team with information on the physical condition of the building, code compliance, room finishes, and the condition of mechanical and other building systems. This allows the information to be useful to architects, engineers, facilities staff, and the public in developing an understanding of how the building is functioning and what may need to be done to optimize its performance. The level of understanding we reach allows us to support capital investment decisions, improvement plans, public outreach, and day to day maintenance plan- ning.
Developing an understanding of the building from a physical point of few is just one part of the equation. It is important to understand a building from the inside out – that is, from the point of view of the occupants and those who maintain and administer the building. At this stage we want to know how the building works as it is currently arranged. We typically will meet with school principals, psychologists, teachers, students, parents and support staff so that we can learn what works, and what doesn’t work, at that point in time.
A part of this effort is an analysis of the neighborhoods in which the schools are located. We are interested in these not only as assemblages of buildings, but want to gain an understanding of the communities that surround and support the schools. This helps us to propose more informed options as the study moves along.
We’ll spend time with town administrators, planners, officials, and leaders so that we can better understand their thoughts and plans for the town and district. Part of this effort will have us meeting with district adminis- tration to review the current programs, pedagogy and curriculum so that we can be up to speed on how the district is currently addressing the edu- cational needs of the students. We’re not looking to challenge opinions or reach conclusions at this point, but simply want to know what the current programs, thoughts, and expectations are. 7 LLB Architects
Once the information has been collected and compared to the OSF guide- lines, we’ll plan a meeting at which we can give you our take on the state of the buildings and their potential for use as they currently stand in light of the programs currently in place; thereby establishing a benchmark and foundation from which to assemble a plan for the future. Planning for the Future Key Issues to Resolve There is a scene in an old Little Rascals show in which the gang is setting off in their home-made fire truck down a long hill. One member looks over and says “I don’t know where we’re going, but we’re on our way”. Though humorous and certainly a classic, it’s not the preferred approach to planning. The work of the team in establishing an understanding of the existing conditions and current programs provides the basis for our next steps, our fire truck, if you will. Properly completing the next step, defin- ing the needs and desires for the future, makes the difference between plunging down the long steep hill and climbing to the top step of the podium.
The places in which we learn impact how we learn, and the effort should be to make those places as flexible, appropriate and supportive as possi- ble. Before recommendations can be suggested for an innovative, state-of- the-art learning environment, the learner, the learning, and the things to be learned must be considered and examined. We’ll engage in a discussion of how the objectives of the District can become the influencing factors in the decision making process. There are a number of factors that will need to be considered as the discussion proceeds:
• The physical needs of the buildings including immediate, mid- range, and long-range needs • Current educational programs and policies • Potential program expansion or changes, or new curricula or programs • In-district and out-of-district student placement programs • State and Federal mandates, both existing and potential • The projected growth and development patterns of the Town • Potential options for the existing and any proposed buildings
Evolving the conversation around these, and any other relevant, points will help the report to take shape in a manner that encourages input and comment on an ongoing basis, helping to shape a more well-rounded list of options and suggestions.
p t u q 8 Qualifications and Proposal for Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project
Illustrative Examples The process of compiling and writing a solid, long-lasting facilities plan can be difficult to convey in words. In many cases, examples of prior studies can help to show how the approach and experience contribute to a successful effort. LLB Architects has enjoyed the opportunity of work- ing with a number of education sector clients, both K -12 and college or university. Our approach is always tailored to support the objective of the client. Mr. Smolley spent almost eight years working for municipali- ties and then 13 years with other architectural firms before joining LLB. Greg’s portfolio complements and expands that of LLB and his experience helps our clients to be engaged, comfortable, and informed as the project progresses.
We have been fortunate to have worked in many different states across the country and have successfully led funding referenda for close to two dozen public projects. The following five projects are the projects we feel are most relevant to the Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project and they are featured in the Specialized Expertise section of this proposal.
• Middletown Public Schools Facilities Utilization Study • Groton Public Schools Pre K - 12 Master Planning Study • Westerly Elementary Schools Facilities Study • The Friendship School in Waterford, CT • Tiverton Elementary School Facilities Comprehensive Study Contributing to the Discourse We think it’s important that the knowledge we gain through our proj- ects not remain within our world, so we are frequent contributors to the national dialogue about school planning and design. In the past five years Mr. Smolley has spoken in Germany about trends in public school design, in Pittsburgh, San Francisco, and Boston about district wide master plan- ning, and at various conferences on subjects ranging from regionaliza- tion of school districts, to incorporation of technology in the schools of the future, to the planning and design of the Friendship School. Greg has been involved in organizing and conducting numerous conferences on school planning and design and is active in a number of groups dedicated to these efforts. Our involvement at this level of the discussion allows us to bring a broad range of ideas to the local discussion of where education, and education facilities, are heading.
u The Friendship School in Waterford, CT 9 LLB Architects
p t u q 10 Qualifications and Proposal for Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project
5 Staffing Plan
Maintaining a steady staff of about 20 personnel, with several of our current projects deep into design or construction, we are well positioned to begin the Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project and bring it through execution in a timely manner.
In his role as Principal–in–Charge, Greg Smolley will be the primary client contact, will manage day–to–day operations, and oversee technical devel- opment. In his 25 years of professional practice, Greg has focused primarily on planning, designing, and managing projects for public, private, and charter schools from Pre K - 12. Consulting Principal Kathleen A. Bartels will also be available and at hand to offer expertise and a fresh set of eyes throughout the project. Her familiarity in educational facilities is enhanced by serving on the Board of Trustees and as Chair of the Buildings and Grounds Committee for Community Preparatory School, a private school serving socio-economically disadvantaged students in grades 3–8. Proj- ect Manager Aimee Lombardo will join Greg in leading the project from conception through fruition. Her creative solutions to complex projects and her attentiveness in developing client relations will be an asset for this project. Project Designer Mark Hallee, AIA will lead day-to-day operations of the project. Mark has focused his career on educational projects with both public and private clients and has a deep history of working with educational clients of all types.
Our project management organization allows us to utilize experienced team members as project leaders; we incorporate effective communication with supervising principals to ensure a superior result.
The project team will be actively involved for the duration of the project, ensuring continuity in all project phases, quality control, and adherence to budget and schedule. The core project team will be supported by a group of architecture professionals, fostered through training, peer sharing, and mentorship, and able to advance to the highest levels of the profes- sion. Our dedicated team bring with them a selection of talents that will produce a streamlined and efficient design project. We have the capacity and capability to complete this project with proficiency and each team member will be assigned to the project as necessary and as appropriate to ensure its success. XI LLB Architects
Greg Smolley, AIA, AICP, REFP, LEED AP Principal-in-Charge Principal Greg Smolley, AIA, has years of experience in public, private, and charter schools from K-12. He joined LLB Architects in 2013 and helped expand the firm's practice areas. Since the start of his career in 1988, Greg has led numerous projects that span throughout the Northeast. He also has experience within planning and legislative areas of the profession that have contributed to his cost-effective, creative, and well-executed architectural approach. Under his leadership, Greg has developed school projects that range from $3.5 to more than $90 million. He has continu- ously presented regionally, nationally, and internationally on several topics of design, team building, and project delivery. Greg is currently an active member of the Boston Society of Architects, the American Institute of Architects, the Council of Educational Facilities Planners, and the American Institute of Certified Planners.
In his early career, he had served as Building/Zoning Official, Director of Building/Planning/Zoning & Economic Development, and as Director of Facilities for several municipalities. Prior to joining LLB Architects, he was a Principal at JCJ Architecture as well as Practice Group Manager and Market Sector Leader for the K-12 Practice Group. His portfolio of work includes award-winning historical restoration and reuse projects, business improve- ment district plans, town-wide comprehensive plans, and fire department master plans; as well as more than a dozen district-wide school compre- hensive plans and at least two dozen school facilities plans.
Previous Experience • Glover Elementary School (Marblehead, Professional Roles • Marine Magnet High School (Groton, CT) MA) • Slate Hill, NY, Otisville, NY, Mount Hope, • Regional Center for the Arts Magnet • Woodland Elementary School (Southfield, NY, Wawayanda, NY Planning and Zoning School (Trumbull, CT) MA) Boards • Catherine Kolnaski Intra-District Elementary • Bagnall Elementary School (Groveland, • Burrillville, RI Zoning Board Magnet School (Groton, CT) MA) • Johnston, RI advisor and staff representa- • Trumbull High School (Trumbull, CT) • Northeast Academy Elementary School tive to Planning Board, Zoning Board, • Waterford High School (Waterford, CT) (Groton, CT) Economic Development Commission, Host • Fitch High School (Groton, CT) • The Friendship School Early Childhood Community Negotiation Team, Central • Norton High School (Norton, CT) School (Waterford, CT) Rhode Island Development Corporation, • Smith Middle School (Glastonbury, CT) • Brooklyn Pre-School (Brooklyn, CT) and Narragansett Bay Commission. • Duggan K – 8 School (Waterbury CT) • Glastonbury, CT Permanent School Build- • Powder Mill Middle School (Southwick, CT) ing Committee • Enfield Middle School (Enfield, CT) • American Planning Association, Rhode Island Chapter, Education and Events Subcommittee • Council of Educational Facilities Planners International, Governor for RI and CT • American Institute of Architects, Commit- tee on Architecture in Education 2009
p t u q XII Qualifications and Proposal for Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project
Kathleen A. Bartels, AIA, LEED AP Consulting Principal Kathleen Bartels has been instrumental in implementing the evolution of LLB Architects from a respected local design firm to a regional leader in major institutional and civic projects. She received a Master in Architecture degree from Harvard University and a Bachelor of Arts from Dartmouth College. After starting her career in Boston, she returned to her native Rhode Island and joined the firm in 1996, becoming a partner in 2000. A past president of AIA Rhode Island, Kathy currently serves on the Board of Trustees for Community Preparatory School, a private school serving socio- economically disadvantaged students in grades 3–8, and recently joined the Board of Directors of the Pawtucket Foundation. Her academic in- volvement has included serving as a guest critic at the Rhode Island School of Design, Roger Williams University, and Wentworth Institute of Technol- ogy, and as a Visiting Team Member for the RWU School of Architecture 2006 NAAB Accreditation Visit. In addition, Kathy and her husband, Steve Caton, collaborated on the design/build of Carabiner’s Indoor Climbing in New Bedford, MA, one of America’s largest indoor climbing gyms. In 2011, she and business partner Chris Ladds completed the renovation and adaptive reuse of a vacant mill building in Pawtucket for the firm’s new corporate headquarters.
Education Professional Activities 2007 AIA Vermont Awards Jury Member Master of Architecture 2012, Panelist for Grow Smart Rhode Island Harvard University Power of Place Summit 2006, President of the AIAri Architectural Forum Bachelor of Arts 2006, Panelist at AIA/New England Regional Dartmouth College Conference, New Design in Context 2005 AIA New Hampshire Awards Jury Member 2005, Women in Architecture and Design Registrations Exhibit at Two Ton Studio in Pawtucket, RI 2005 AIA Chesapeake Bay (MD) Awards Jury Rhode Island #2594, 1999 Member Massachusetts #31236, 2009 Professional Positions Connecticut #9955, 2001 2012 - 2015, The Pawtucket Foundation, 2004–2006, Scholarship Committee NCARB Certificate #52494, 1999 Board of Directors and Riverfront Planning of the AIAri Architectural Forum LEED AP, 2009 Committee 2004, AIAri President Associations 2010-2014, Board of Trustees of the Com- American Institute of Architects munity Preparatory School 2000–2005, AIAri Board of Directors Society for College & University Planning US Green Building Council 2012-2013 Chair of Buildings and Grounds Committee of the Community Preparatory School XIII LLB Architects
Aimee G. Lombardo, AIA, LEED AP BD+C Project Manager With almost 15 years of extensive experience, Aimee has managed and led nearly forty of the firm’s projects to award–winning success, such as the Cabinet Building at Brown University, the Maynard Public Library, and the Bolton Public Library. Before joining the firm in 2002, Aimee gradu- ated with a B.Arch degree from Syracuse University and started her career at Kallmann McKinnell & Wood Architects, most notably as a design team member of the Blanton Museum of Art in Austin. She has immeasurable experience in a vast amount construction project types inclusive of pres- ervation, laboratory, housing, higher education, library, civic, residential, ecclesiastical, and unique project types such as the renovation for the RI Division of Motor Vehicles. Aimee is a notable designer demonstrating creative solutions to some of the most complex projects in our office.
As part of her higher education experience, she has been deeply involved in several of the firm’s laboratory projects, including the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology laboratory and the Division of Biology and Medicine at Brown University and the Ecology Lab at Rhode Island College. She has been the project manager for several major library projects including the Bolton Public Library and the Maynard Public Library. She is now leading the design and construction of a project for Harvard Town Hall, a renova- tion and addition to a historic 1870's town building in Harvard's Town Center Historic District.
Education Experience Activities 1999 2002–present 2012–2014 Bachelor of Architecture LLB Architects AIAri Board of Directors University of Syracuse, Syracuse, NY 2001–2002 2012-present Registrations Sear Brown Group, Providence, RI AIAri Committee on the Environment Rhode Island #3558 LEED AP BD+C 1999–2001 2012-present Kallmann McKinnell and Wood, Boston, MA North Smithfield Sustainability Council Associations American Institute of Architects 1998–1999 2009-present US Green Building Council Wooley Morris Architects, Syracuse, NY NCARB Mentor
1996–1999 Richard Morris Architect, West Greenwich, RI
p t u q XIV Qualifications and Proposal for Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project
Mark A. Hallee, AIA Project Designer With over 15 years of experience in architecture, Mark A. Hallee has helped shape multiple award-winning projects since joining the firm in 2005. Since graduating from Roger Williams University with a B.Arch in 1995, his experience has encompassed all phases of the design process, from pre-design conceptual studies to complicated construction admin- istration. He is admired for his conscientious, talented, thoughtful, and meticulous design work.
His career has been focused around significant academic and institutional projects around New England and projects within an urban and campus context. He recently led the project team for Hillside Hall, a new 429-bed residential building occuping a key gateway site into the Hillside District at the University of Rhode Island. The project will be at minimum LEED Silver- certified and actively employ the use of sustainable elements.
Among his relevant experience is Community Preparatory School at LLB Architects as well as projects from earlier in his career including Capuano Early Childhood Development Center, Beaver Country Day School Perform- ing Arts Center, Match School Tutor Renovation, Thompson Middle School.
Education Experience Associations Bachelor of Architecture 2005–present American Institute of Architects Roger Williams University LLB Architects Society for College and University Planning
Honorable Mention, Bernard Shaw Thesis 2000–2003, 2004–2005 Award HMFH Architects Cambridge, MA Pella Design Award 2003–2004 Registrations Arrowstreet Massachusetts #20239 Somerville, MA
1999 Warner & Associates Boston, MA
1996–1999 Williams & Frehsee Architects and Builders Brattleboro, VT
u Terryville High School in Terryville, CT 11 LLB Architects
p t u q 12 Qualifications and Proposal for Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project
Subconsultants
See appendix for subconsultant resumes Just as any whole is better than the sum of its parts, LLB Architects believes in enlisting proven engineers and consulting firms to compliment our own strengths. The group of consultants assembled for the Ledyard School Improvement Project is based upon our previous positive teaming experi- ence with them. Each meets the professional standards mutually required of all members of the team, all excel in their specific fields, all aspire to the highest standards of their professions, and most importantly, they all have particular knowledge in working with projects like this. As a result of this team experience, we have developed an effective, streamlined communi- cation system to maximize constructive output. We absolutely expect the best from our consultants and, as our pledge to you, will demand the best from them for this project.
Consulting Engineering Service customized and innovative solutions. Our solid MEP Engineers working partnerships have earned us a 90% Founded in 1994, Consulting Engineering repeat business ratio. Services has grown in size and reputation for some very simple reasons. We believe in Vanderweil’s Technology Design Group offering our clients the most advanced energy provides consulting and design services for efficient building solutions that fit our clients technology infrastructure, technology spaces, project budgets, schedules and complexity. We audiovisual, and security system designs. We believe that successful projects are the results have built a global reputation as innovative of proactive service – in planning, on the job, technology solution designers in both the and after. commercial and institutional practice areas. As an independent consulting and engineering Our Approach firm, we have no obligations to any integrator, The four principals of the firm have worked distributor, carrier or other type of vendor. We together to develop a reputation for design offer unbiased recommendations to meet each excellence in Education, Health Care, Research client’s objectives. & Development, Corporate Office, Sports & Recreation, Community and Private Estate Technology equipment and systems are at projects. The CES staff of over 60 experienced the core of almost every activity in today’s professionals is divided into manageable world. As a team member, Vanderweil fills teams that specialize in mechanical, electrical, the technology specialist’s role, identifying plumbing and fire protection engineering and documenting each project’s technology service for analysis, design, commissioning requirements, establishing the basis for the and construction administration for projects smooth integration of the technology systems throughout the Northeast and beyond. into the overall project documents. Our prac- tice includes all of the low voltage technology As the popularity of BIM software gained systems, improving document coordination momentum with the architectural commu- and ensuring tight integration between each nity, CES welcomed this new technology to of the systems. We actively coordinate with coordinate and aid in clash detection with our supporting systems, such as mechanical and 3D drawings. Early in 2009, Autodesk Revit electrical systems. MEP 2010 was released. MEP 2010 was a sig- nificant improvement over its predecessor. We Girard and Company LLP embraced this software and started to utilize Structural Engineer BIM to its full potential of project coordina- Girard and Company LLP, a Hartford, CT area tion. At present, we use Revit MEP 2013 on all structural engineering firm founded in 1977, of our new projects. has established a respected reputation for delivering engineering excellence and client Vanderweil satisfaction. We pride ourselves on our ability Technology Consultant to listen to our client’s desires and provide Vanderweil Engineers is a mechanical, elec- structural solutions that can be incorporated trical, plumbing/fire protection, and tech- into the whole building system. nology services engineering firm dedicated to providing value-added engineering services to Over the past 36 years Girard and Company our clients. Our staff of over 400 offers diverse has provided extensive design and engineering expertise and a commitment to developing of building structures for Pre-K through 12 public school facilities with designs ranging 13 LLB Architects
from intricate renovations and additions to We are committed to working with each new facilities. Girard and Company’s central Client to achieve design excellence and pro- Connecticut location allows for reliable access vide premium service. to projects sites around New England, and is licensed to practice professional engineering Dr. Randall Howard Collins in the states of Connecticut, Massachusetts, Educational Consultant Rhode Island, Vermont, and New York. Randall Collins is the former Superintendent of Schools in Waterford, Connecticut and Utilizing the latest in engineering design Past-President of the American Association of software, Building Information Modeling (BIM) School Administrators. and a proven common sense approach to structural design Girard and Company, L.L.P. Randy has been a professional educator for has the ability to produce certified structural 39 years serving in Maine, Massachusetts and drawings and specifications fully detailing and Connecticut. He received his BA degree in describing building foundations and super- History/Government from Gordon College. structure while maintaining project design After completing his military duty, he pursued schedules, costs and a commitment to overall a career in education receiving a Masters excellence. and Certificate of Advanced Study from the University of Maine and a doctorate in 1987 Megson, Heagle and Friend from Boston University. Over the last 29 years Civil Engineer he has served as Superintendent of Schools Megson, Heagle and Friend is a multi-disci- in three different communities, the last a19 plinary organization offering a wide variety of in Waterford, Connecticut. He pioneered the land use services starting with initial concep- development of the “Learning through Service tual planning through to project completion Program”, which made Waterford one of the and final documentation. Our services encom- first public schools in America to require a des- pass the disciplines of Civil Engineering, Land ignated number of community service hours as Surveying, Land Use Planning and Wetland a requirement for graduation, prompting good Delineation and Evaluation. Working for both citizenship through community service. the municipal and private sectors the staff is comprised of Professional Engineers, Licensed Having begun his career as a Head Start Land Surveyors and Soil Scientists. Teacher, Randy has remained a vocal advocate for pre-school education, for the right and Megson, Heagle and Friend was organized in necessity for all children to learn and for 1980 by the late Harry K. Megson & John L. adequate and equitable funding for public Heagle. The philosophy was to be a service schools. oriented company providing flexibility and per- sonal attention. Megson, Heagle and Friend O&G Industries is a company that strives to balance diversity Cost Estimator and prompt service with individual attention to O&G Industries, Inc. has completed hundreds each and every project. A vast majority of our of large and small scale construction projects projects are directly supervised by one project over the last decade and has been estimating manager from start to finish. projects since 1923.
Megson, Heagle and Friend offers a wide We have developed a budget methodology range of services to address the diverse and that has proven itself countless times. O&G unique needs of each project. The regulatory has excellent knowledge of the local construc- environment is constantly changing and we tion market and keeps a comprehensive strive to keep pace through continuing educa- database of current bids and costs. We are tion. Today’s projects must balance economic, able to obtain budget pricing from local spe- social and environmental goals. These consid- cialist contractors, who will help us to provide erations ensure the best project possible. Even accurate budget costs for the Ledyard School difficult projects are designed to the maximum Facilities Improvement project. O&G has been potential through experience and creative providing conceptual estimates for school and thinking. municipal programs for several decades. We have provided the cost estimates at inception CR3 of major construction programs in Bridgeport, Landscape Architect Waterbury, Hartford and Waterford; used by CR3 is an award winning professional these municipalities to successfully plan their Landscape Architectural design firm located program based upon needs and availability of in Simsbury, Connecticut. We provide lasting funding. design solutions through innovative, creative, and cost-effective site planning. Working as part of the team with LLB Archi- tects, O&G will provide detailed project cost Our focus is to provide professional service estimating to ensure the School Facilities that is responsive and personal and to facili- Improvement plan can be used for design and tate effective team communication. We pride construction of individual projects that are ourselves in creating long lasting Client rela- completed on budget and within schedule. tionships. CR3’s principals and design teams Our estimates will include all soft costs as are involved with the projects throughout all required by the Owner, as well as land acquisi- phases from inception to completion which tion costs. Bruce Gelbar, our Senior Estimator, ensures consistency and continuity. Our will be assisted in this by our estimating team, approach brings to each endeavor a Client including O&G’s Site Engineering Department oriented, professional design team with a who will work closely with the design team to strong knowledge of land use approvals and maximize any proposed site development at permitting and experience in seeing the proj- the most cost effective budget. ects through to construction. This process and focused attention ensures the project’s and our Client’s success.
p t u q 14 Qualifications and Proposal for Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project 15 LLB Architects
6 / 8 Specialized Expertise / Similar Projects and References
LLB Architects has a strong repu- LLB Architects has a core focus in the planning, tation for delivering projects on design, and construction of educational budget and within schedule. Hav- ing maintained working relation- facilities, from Pre-K to 12 and Higher ships with many of our clients, they Education. Planning learning environments is continue to return to us for our unwavering ability to produce the our strong-suit and our experience demonstrates highest quality work that satisfies our tailored project approach in which each their needs. design is unique and emerges from the process A selection of similar projects will of working with our clients. invariably omit some, but the scope of our work has allowed us the op- portunity to work with some of the best clients imaginable – dynamic and creative teams, and engaged, caring consultants. We have been fortunate to have worked in many different states across the country and have suc- cessfully led funding referenda for close to two dozen public projects. The following five projects are the projects we feel are most relevant to the Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project.
• Middletown Public Schools Facilities Utilization Study • Groton Public Schools Pre K - 12 Master Planning Study • Westerly Elementary Schools Facilities Study • The Friendship School in Waterford, CT • Tiverton Elementary School Facilities Comprehensive Study
LLB Architects has worked with some of Rhode Island’s top higher educa- tion institutions, including Brown University, Bryant University, Johnson & Wales University, Rhode Island College, University of Rhode Island, as well as private schools like Moses Brown School, Community Preparatory School, Lincoln School and more. Our public work for municipalities and states in New England is a testament to our capability for project sup- port and advocacy as well as an ability to effectively communicate to an audience of stakeholders. Our references serve as our best evaluation of performance, so we proudly include reference contact information with each of our projects. They are the best indiciation of how we can continue working with you to lead this project to its ultimate success.
Our experience all over New England includes projects that contribute to the contextual fabric of a campus and create a positive impact on their community.
t Walter E. Ranger Elementary School in Tiverton, RI
p t u q 16 Qualifications and Proposal for Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project 17 LLB Architects
Middletown Public Schools Facilities Utilization Study
Reference Greg Smolley was the project manager and lead client contact when his Mr. Kendall Jackson firm was retained by the City of Middletown, CT for a facilities study. The Director of Facilities 860.638.1407 intent of the study was ascertain public opinion of the district and to develop a range of options for consideration by the district: capital invest- Services ments, facilities maintenance, building utilization, potential grade re-con- Facilities Analysis, Building and Educational Programming, Capital Improvement Planning, figuration, reconfigured attendance boundaries. The team evaluated the Demographic and Enrollment Projections, existing facilities for ADA compliance, the conditions of the infrastructure Attendance Boundary Review and Revisions of each building, and how the space program related to the educational Size / Scope program. 11 educational facilities 5,100 students The study had an overarching intention of closing a particular elementary 8 E.S. /2 M.S./1 H.S. approx. 950,000 sf school. This school was performing well, but its location within the city caused problems with racial and free & reduced lunch proportions across Study Period the district. Each of the elementary schools was assessed and it was quickly 2009 ascertained that none of them were in physical need and they were actu- ally quite well located to accommodate the current and projected enroll- ment patterns.
Through a number of facilitated outreach meetings the public was en- gaged in an open and ongoing dialogue about their likes and dislikes relative to their neighborhood school, the curriculum offerings, and the district in general. These meetings took the form of workshops with residents working with each other and then reporting out. Surveys were distributed to all of the teachers and students in the district to gain insight into their feelings as well.
Ultimately the study came to focus on the retention of all of the existing schools – closing one would require construction of another. It was sug- gested that a reconfiguration of the attendance boundaries, which simpli- fied bus routing and eliminated many long bus rides for students, would be one element of a successful resolution. It was also suggested that the school which was the original focus of the study become host to an intra- district magnet school curriculum. This would reserve a majority of the seats for local students, give the local students priority in school choice, and bring in students from other elementary schools within the district to assure balance across the district. These suggestions were adopted by the district and the plan was implemented without the closure or construction of any buildings.
p t u q 18 Qualifications and Proposal for Ledyard School Facilities Improvement Project
Groton Public Schools Pre K - 12 Master Planning Study
Reference Greg Smolley has worked with the Town of Groton, CT since 2002 and Mr. Gary Schneider has led two facilities master planning studies as well as the design and Director of Public Works 860.448.4083 construction of two elementary schools and the renovation of the high school. Greg’s leadership in working with three existing committees, the Mr. Mark Oefinger Board of Education, and town staff to develop a facilities master plan to Town Manager 860.441.6633 address the aging buildings and disparate learning environments across the town resulted in a successful referendum for the first phase of a three Services phase plan. The Master Plan provided guidance to the town and district in Study Programming, Planning, Concept Design, planning for capital improvements and will ultimately reduce the number Enrollment Projections, of facilities from 13 to 8, provide expanded space for early childhood pro- Project grams, and produce a template for future elementary schools. Architecture and Interior design, CD, CA
Size In writing this plan, Greg and his team worked with the committees in 14 educational facilities monthly meetings and with town and district staff on a daily basis. The 5,000 students 825,000 sf district was spending a disproportionately large amount of money per stu- dent on building maintenance, and the school sizes varied from just over Cost 100 students to just under 500. The suggestions contained in the adopted $385 million master plan allow for an enrollment range of 400 – 550 students in each Completion of the elementary schools and locates the schools in the areas of great- 2002 (original study) est population concentrations. This led to the construction of two new 2010 (updated study) elementary schools, one of which is an intra-district magnet school.
Also identified were potential uses for any buildings that might be closed as the town moved forward with the plan. This forward looking approach allowed the construction of a regional magnet school for marine sciences to be built, providing a use for an abandoned school site without any delay or time for decay of the existing building. The project's extensive research, thorough process and effective presentations contributed to ap- proval by town voters. 19 LLB Architects
groton public schools k-12 master planning study grotongroton, connecticut public schools k-12 master planning study groton, connecticut
groton public schools k-12 master planning study groton, connecticut
Town map of existing schools
ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS IN GRADE COMBINATIONS ES TIM ATE OF S TATE V S . TOW N PROJ ECT COS TS [does not include staffing & operational costs] Enrollment3000 projections in grade combinations3000 Estimate of state vs. town project costs 350
] PHAS E 1 2800 2800 S PHAS E 2 PHAS E 3 PHAS E 4 TOTAL COS T Grades K-5 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS IN GRADE COMBINATIONS N $325 M 325 O ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS IN GRADE COMBINATIONS I L
2600 2600 L $300 M 300 [does not include staffing & operational costs] I 2 8 7 ES TIM ATE OF S TATE V S . TOW N PROJ ECT COS TS Grades 6-8 [does not include staffing & operational costs] 3000 M 3000
ES TIM ATE OF S TATE V S . TOW N PROJ ECT COS TS 8
1 $275 M 275 3000 N 3000
2400 2400 I 350 [
Grades 9-12 ] 350 T 2 7 2 6 3 8 2 5 8 4 2 5 1 2 5 0 4 2 5 0 6 2 5 0 6 2 5 0 2 5 0 2 5 0 4 PHAS E 1 $250 M ] 250 S PHAS E 2 S PHAS E 3 PHAS E 4 TOTAL COS T 2208000 2200 2800 PHAS E 1 S PHAS E 2 PHAS E 3 O PHAS E 4 TOTAL COS T 2800 2800 N $325 M 325 C
Grades K-5 N $225 M $325 M 225 325 O I
Grades K-5 E O I L 2000 2000 T L A 2600 $200 M 2600 L $300 M 200 300 I 2 8 7 T
2600 2600 L $300 M 300 I 2 8 7 S
Grades 6-8 M 1800 1800
Grades 6-8 M $175 M 175 8
] 1
8 $275 M 275 N 1 I 2400 S 2400 $275 M 275 N [ 2400 2400 I N 1600 1600 $150 M 150 [
Grades 9-12 O T
Grades 9-12 I 2 7 2 6 3 8 2 5 8 4 2 5 1 2 5 0 4 2 5 0 6 2 5 0 6 2 5 0 2 5 0 2 5 0 4 T L 2 7 2 6 3 8 2 5 8 4 2 5 1 2 5 0 4 2 5 0 6 2 5 0 6 2 5 0 2 5 0 2 5 0 4 $250 M 250 S
L $125 M $250 M 125 250 S 12402000 1400 I 2200 9 4 2200 2200 O M O 1
1 5 9 1 C 1 3 8 2 1 3 7 1 3 9 6 1 3 6 1 3 8 1 3 8 6 1 3 5 1 3 2 0 1 2 6 0 1
N $100 M 100 C
0 I $225 M 225
1200 1200 [ $225 M 225
E
E T
2000 $75 M 2000 T 75
2000 2000 T S 1 3 1 6 9 A A 1000 1000 O $200 M $200 M 200 200 1 2 T T C $50 M 50
0 5 9 0 5 0 5 S 0 4 8 S
N
1800 1800 1800 1800 800 800
W