DOCSLIB.ORG

NCC Tender File # AL1509 Project Description War of 1812 Monument

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NCC Tender File # AL1509 Project Description War of 1812 Monument NCC Tender File # AL1509 Project Description War of 1812 Monument – Site Construction A MANDATORY site visit will be held on Wednesday, April 23, 2014 at 1:30pm Ottawa time. The exact meeting place is in front of East Block on Parliament Hill, Ottawa, ON. All costs incurred by the Bidder to attend the site visit will be at their expense. The NCC will not reimburse any Bidder for expenses related to the site visit. Site Visit To confirm your attendance at this site visit and to gain access to the grounds please communicate with Marie-Andrée Bureau at 613-239- 5678 ext. 5268 or by email at [email protected] . Please note that all visits to “secure” sites (official residences and Parliament Hill) shall be coordinated with, and approved by NCC Corporate Security. Mrs. Bureau will be communicating your presence to NCC Corporate Security. Closing date and time April 29, 2014 at 3pm Ottawa time April 14, 2014 INVITATION TO TENDER & ACCEPTANCE FORM RETURN TENDERS TO: National Capital Commission NCC Tender Number 40 Elgin Street, 3rd Floor, Service Centre AL1509 Ottawa, ON K1P 1C7 NCC Contract Number TENDER CLOSING DATE April 29, 2014 AND TIME: at 3:00 p.m., Ottawa time DESCRIPTION OF WORK: War of 1812 Monument – Site Construction 1. BUSINESS NAME AND ADDRESS OF BIDDER Name: Address: Telephone number: Fax number: 2. THE OFFER The Bidder offers to the National Capital Commission (NCC) to perform and complete the work for the above mentioned project in accordance with the tender documents for the total tender amount (to be expressed in numbers only) of: Sub Total $ HST – 13% $ TOTAL $ 3. TENDER VALIDITY PERIOD The tender shall not be withdrawn for a period of 60 days following the date and time of tender closing. 4. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 1. The following are the contract documents: (a) Invitation to Tender & Acceptance Form when signed by the NCC; (b) Duly completed Invitation to Tender & Acceptance Form and any Appendices attached thereto; (c) Drawings and Specifications; (d) General Conditions (GC1 to GC10); (e) Supplementary Conditions, if any; (f) Insurance Terms; (g) Occupational Health and Safety Requirements; (h) Addenda (i) Any amendments issued or any allowable tender revision received before the date and time set for tender closing; (j) Any amendment incorporated by mutual agreement between the NCC and the Contractor before acceptance of the tender; and (k) Any amendment or variation of the contract documents that is made in accordance with the General Conditions; (l) Security Requirements. 2. The language of the contract documents shall be the language of the Invitation to Tender & Acceptance Form submitted. April 14, 2014 Page 1 of 4 INVITATION TO TENDER & ACCEPTANCE FORM NCC Tender Number AL1509 NCC Contract Number 5. APPENDICES The tender includes Appendix(ces) Nos I and II to the Invitation to Tender & Acceptance Form. 6. ACCEPTANCE AND CONTRACT Upon acceptance of the Contractor’s offer by the NCC, a binding Contract shall be formed between the NCC and the Contractor. The documents forming the Contract shall be the contract documents referred to in 4 – CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 7. CONSTRUCTION TIME The Contractor shall perform and complete the Work within 14 weeks from July 28, 2014. Work must be completed no later than October 31, 2014. 8. UNIT PRICE TABLE The Bidder agrees that (a) the Unit Price Table designates that part of the Work to which a Unit Price Arrangement applies. (b) the Price per Unit and the Estimated Total Price must be entered for each item listed; (c) the Price per Unit as tender governs in calculating the Total Estimated Amount, and any errors in the extension of the Price per Unit and in the addition of the Estimated Total Prices shall be corrected by the NCC in order to obtain the Total Estimated Amount; and (d) the following table is the Unit Price Table for the purposes of the tender and the Contract: UNIT PRICE TABLE Note: Transfer the Total Estimated Amount from the Unit Price Table to item 2 – THE OFFER of this Invitation to Tender & Acceptance Form Item Description Unit Qty Unit Price Amount 01 52 00 - Mobilisation & Construction Lump 1 1 facilities sum 2 01 10 00 - Stop work (allowance) Hours 1000 Lump 3 02 41 13 - Selective demolition 1 sum 4 02 58 11 - Ground marker Unit 7 03 10 00 - Cast-in-place concrete Lump Structural concrete slab under monument 1 sum 5 Peripheral concrete slab and concrete drop m3 28 sidewalk Concrete curb and drop curb L.M. 7 April 14, 2014 Page 2 of 4 INVITATION TO TENDER & ACCEPTANCE FORM Drop sidewalk in existing sidewalk m3 3 Lump 6 Signage 1 sum 7 31 05 16 - Aggregate material m3 200 Lump 8 31 22 16.13 - Roadway subgrade reshaping 1 sum 31 23 33.01 - Excavation, trenching and Lump 9 1 backfilling sum 10 31 32 19 - Geotextiles m2 170 31 37 00.01 - Granite pavers and granite curb Granite curb type A L.M. 42 Granite curb type B L.M. 7 11 Granite curb type C L.M. 7 Granite pavers type D m2 68 Granite pavers type E m2 18 Lump 31 37 00.02 - Artwork Installation 1 allowance $ 60,552.00 sum 12 31 37 00.02 - Artwork Installation - Lump 1 Contractor OVERHEAD sum 31 63 23 - Bored Concrete piles 13 Bored piles L.M. 80 Lump Pile head 1 sum 14 32 12 16.01 -Asphalt Paving m2 300 15 32 15 40 - Crushed stone surfacing m2 38 32 17 23 - Pavement markings Colour Sealing Coating m2 242 16 1. Stop line painting (0.40 m width) L.M. 6 2. Parking lot line painting (0.12m width) L.M. 6 17 32 91 19.13 - Top soil placement and grading m3 15 18 32 92 23 - Sodding m2 130 April 14, 2014 Page 3 of 4 INVITATION TO TENDER & ACCEPTANCE FORM Lump 19 33 05 13 - Storm Utility drainage piping 1 sum Lump 20 Modification to existing irrigation system 1 sum Sub-Total 9. The basis of award is low total cost to the NCC including all taxes. 10. I/We acknowledge receipt of the following addenda and have included for the requirement of it/them in my/our tendered price: ______________________________________________________________________________ (Bidder to ender number of addenda issued, if any). 11. TENDER SECURITY 1. The Bidders shall enclose tender security with its tender in accordance with GI08 TENDER SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. 2. If the security furnished does not comply fully with the requirements referred to in paragraph 1) herein, the tender shall be disqualified. 3. If a security deposit is furnished as tender security, it shall be forfeited in the event that the tender is accepted by the NCC and the Contractor fails to provide Contract Security in accordance with GC9 CONTRACT SECURITY, provided that the NCC may, if it is in the public interest, waive the forfeiture of the security deposit. We hereby offer to supply to the NCC in accordance with the terms and conditions set out herein, the construction work listed above and on any attached sheets at the submitted price(s). Name and title of person authorized to sign on behalf of Bidder Signature Date (please print or type) Your tender is accepted to supply to the NCC, in accordance with the terms and conditions set out herein, referred to herein or attached hereto, the construction services listed herein and on any attached sheets at the price(s) set out therefore. Name and title of the person authorized to sign on behalf of the NCC Signature Date (please print or type) INVOICING Send the original invoice and 1 copy to: Accounts Payable National Capital Commission 202-40 Elgin Street Ottawa, ON K1P 1C7 Or by email at the following address: [email protected] To ensure prompt payment, please prepare your invoice in accordance with the prices quoted. Errors in invoicing can cause delay of payment. Submit your invoice to the address shown above and clearly indicate the Purchase Order number. April 14, 2014 Page 4 of 4 LIST OF SUB-CONTRACTORS INVITATION TO TENDER & ACCEPTANCE FORM APPENDIX 1 1) The Bidder will subcontract the parts of the work listed below to the subcontractor named for each part. The Bidder agrees not to make changes in the list of subcontractors without the written consent of the NCC Representative. The Bidder understands that for each part of the work identified as Mandatory, if more than one subcontractor is named or no subcontractor is named, or, the Bidder fails to state that the work will be done by its own forces where applicable, the tender will be disqualified. 2) The Bidder certifies that tenders for the part(s) of the Work listed below were received from the following subcontractors: NON-MANDATORY REQUIREMENT: (a) Any other work not listed below Type of Work: ________________________________ Sub-contractor: ___________________________ Type of Work: ________________________________ Sub-contractor: ___________________________ Type of Work: ________________________________ Sub-contractor: ___________________________ Type of Work: ________________________________ Sub-contractor: ___________________________ Type of Work: ________________________________ Sub-contractor: ___________________________ Type of Work: ________________________________ Sub-contractor: ___________________________ MANDATORY REQUIREMENT: The subcontractors performing the work listed below must be identified. Failure to disclose the name of the sub-contractor for any work identified will result in the disqualification of your tender. (a) n/a Sub-contractor: ________________________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________________________________ (b) n/a Sub-contractor: ________________________________________________________________________ Address: ________________________________________________________________________
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monuments and Memories in Ontario, 1850-2001
    FORGING ICONOGRAPHIES AND CASTING COLONIALISM: MONUMENTS AND MEMORIES IN ONTARIO, 1850-2001 By Brittney Anne Bos A thesis submitted to the Department of History In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (September 2016) Copyright ©Brittney Anne Bos, 2016 ii Abstract Commemorations are a critical window for exploring the social, political, and cultural trends of a specific time period. Over the past two centuries, the commemorative landscape of Ontario reaffirmed the inclusion/exclusion of particular racial groups. Intended as static markers to the past, monuments in particular visually demonstrated the boundaries of a community and acted as ongoing memorials to existing social structures. Using a specific type of iconography and visual language, the creators of monuments imbued the physical markers of stone and bronze with racialized meanings. As builders were connected with their own time periods and social contexts, the ideas behind these commemorations shifted. Nonetheless, creators were intent on producing a memorial that educated present and future generations on the boundaries of their “imagined communities.” This dissertation considers the carefully chosen iconographies of Ontario’s monuments and how visual symbolism was attached to historical memory. Through the examination of five case studies, this dissertation examines the shifting commemorative landscape of Ontario and how memorials were used to mark the boundaries of communities. By integrating the visual analysis of monuments and related images, it bridges a methodological and theoretical gap between history and art history. This dissertation opens an important dialogue between these fields of study and demonstrates how monuments themselves are critical “documents” of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizontal Initiatives
    Horizontal Initiatives Name of Horizontal Initiative: Bicentennial Commemoration of the War of 1812 Name of Lead Department(s): Department of Canadian Heritage Lead Department Program Activity: Promotion and Attachment to Canada Start Date: July 13, 2011 End Date: March 31, 2014 Total Federal Funding Allocation (from start date to end date): $28 million Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): The commemoration of the War of 1812 provides Canadians across the country with a unique opportunity to participate in national and local initiatives to highlight this defining moment in our history. Acting as the focal point for the Government of Canada War of 1812 initiatives, the Department of Canadian Heritage (PCH) provides leadership and coordination to stimulate involvement of federal departments and agencies to increase awareness and appreciation of the importance of the War of 1812 on the evolution of Canada. Canadian Heritage is working closely with federal departments and agencies to create commemorations worthy of this important milestone and to generate excitement about our country and its history among all Canadians. Budget 2010 provided incremental funding of $28 million over three years, allocated to the Department of Canadian Heritage ($17.8 million), the Parks Canada Agency ($9.42 million) and the Canadian War Museum ($780,000). In addition to this incremental funding, existing programs within the Department of Canadian Heritage are funding War of 1812 initiatives from within existing budgets. Other federal departments and agencies are also developing activities from within their existing budgets. Shared Outcome(s): There are three levels of shared outcomes as identified below: Final Outcomes: • Canadians have an increased awareness of their history as it relates to the War of 1812.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Memorials Rideau Canal Ride
    Hull Barracks Canadian War War Never Again Museum Regiment de Hull Tank Memorial Office Buildings and Canadian Phalanx National War Memorial Ottawa Military Memorials Ottawa River Ride War of 1812 Monument Peace Tower The Valiants Tomb of the Unknown Soldier Ottawa River Ride Hull Armory • Never Again War Memorial to Peace and Remembrance • Le Regiment de Hull tanks Richmond Landing • Royal Canadian Navy Monument Canadian War Museum • Museum • Memorial Hall Wellington and Lyon • Memorial Office Buildings • Canadian Phalanx Parliament Hill • War of 1812 Monument • Peace Tower Confederation Square • National War Memorial (The Response) • Tomb of the Unknown Soldier • The Valiants Memorial Peace Garden Colonel John By Peacekeeping Memorial Ottawa Memorial Chemical Warfare Ottawa Military Memorials Sussex Drive Ride Mackenzie Papineau Memorial CANLOAN Memorial Flanders Memorial Defence Artillery Memorial Tomb of the Unknown Soldier Sussex Drive Ride Confederation Square •National War Memorial (The Response) •Tomb of the Unknown Soldier •The Valiants Memorial Major’s Hill Park •Colonel By Statue National Gallery of Canada •Reconciliation (Peacekeeping Monument) NRC Sussex Drive •Chemical Warfare Volunteers •Defence of Hong Kong Memorial (southeast corner of King Edward & Sussex) Green Island •National Artillery Memorial •Remember Flanders (John McCrae) •MacKenzie Papineau Memorial •Ottawa Memorial to Commonwealth Air Forces •Peace Garden Sussex and Stanley Ave. • CANLOAN Memorial (southwest corner at start of bike path) Veterans Grove Cartier
    [Show full text]
  • November 16 • Louis Riel Day Full Coverage on Pages 9-16, 32
    Issue No. 83, Winter 2014 NOVEMBER 16 • LOUIS RIEL DAY FULL COVERAGE ON paGES 9-16, 32 Executive members of the MNO Veterans’ Council, (left to right) MNO Veteran Tim Majovsky, President Joseph Paquette and Senator Dr. Alis Kennedy lay wreaths at the “Northwest Rebellion” monument at the provincial Louis Riel Day ceremony at Queen’s Park in Toronto. MEETING MATTAWA SISTERS IN HARVEST WITH NIPISSING SPIRIT BOUNTY PREMIER Historic research report Vigils in honour of Stories about hunting MNO-Ontario meeting released on Ontario missing and murdered the mighty moose advances Métis issues Métis community Aboriginal women Page 3 Page 5 Page 19 Page 29 Métis Voyageur 2 Winter 2014, Issue no. 83 The Métis Voyageur FAMILY Winter 2014, No. 83 Produced by the Métis Nation of Ontario Communications Branch: Julie Cruikshank Jennifer & David Mike Fedyk Marc St. Germain New addition to Sara Kelly Contributors tie the knot! the Métis family Bobbi Aubin Tracy Bald Art Bennett Valerie Boese Matthew Bombardier Rachelle Brunelle-McColl Jerry Clarke Richard Cuddy Rochelle Ethier Kirk Fournier Greg Garratt A.G. Gauthier Reta Gordon Sheila Grantham Richard Gravelle Christina Hodgins-Stewart Yvonne Jensen Alain Lefebvre Gary Lipinski Jennifer Lord Sahra MacLean Jason Madden Rick Meilleur Benny Michaud Patti Moreau Atlas Martin. Jennifer Nicholson Kaitlyn Ouimette Joan Panizza Jennifer Nicholson (Henry) and David Nicholson submitted by | Valerie Boose Joseph Paquette on their wedding day. Jennifer Parkinson We would like to welcome the of Huguette and Douglas Boese, Robin Pilon newest addition to the Métis nephew to Kevin Boese and Bar- Jordi Playne | Joseph Poitras submitted by Jennifer Nicholson family, Atlas Martin.
    [Show full text]
  • London Journal of Canadian Studies Article
    London Journal of Canadian Studies Article Memorializing an Ideal: Representations of Inclusivity in Canada’s National Public Monuments Eric Weeks1,* How to cite: Weeks, E., ‘Memorializing an Ideal: Representations of Inclusivity in Canada’s National Public Monuments.’ London Journal of Canadian Studies, 2019, 34(1), pp. 123–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2019v34.007. Published: 14 November 2019 Peer Review: This article has been peer reviewed through the journal’s standard double-blind peer-review, where both the reviewers and authors are anonymized during review. Copyright: © 2019, The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2019v34.007. Open Access: London Journal of Canadian Studies is a peer-reviewed open access journal. * Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Bridgewater State University, USA Memorializing an Ideal: Representations of Inclusivity in Canada’s National Public Monuments Eric Weeks Abstract In every corner of every town and city, memorials can be found existing in a variety of forms and serving a variety of functions. From small plaques or roadside markers to grand monuments commemo- rating a national or global event, they attempt to remind the public of individuals or a shared history. However, memorials also perform another role, and that is to not only record and display those subjects which a society deems worthy of commemoration, but also how those histories are shaped, framed and positioned to fit contemporary needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Inscribing a Monument: Vimy in the Canadian Consciousness La Réinscription D’Un Monument: Vimy Dans La Conscience Canadienne
    Études canadiennes / Canadian Studies Revue interdisciplinaire des études canadiennes en France 80 | 2016 Le Canada et la Grande Guerre Re-inscribing a Monument: Vimy in the Canadian Consciousness La réinscription d’un monument: Vimy dans la conscience canadienne Joan Coutu Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/eccs/663 DOI: 10.4000/eccs.663 ISSN: 2429-4667 Publisher Association française des études canadiennes (AFEC) Printed version Date of publication: 1 June 2016 Number of pages: 67-88 ISSN: 0153-1700 Electronic reference Joan Coutu, « Re-inscribing a Monument: Vimy in the Canadian Consciousness », Études canadiennes / Canadian Studies [Online], 80 | 2016, Online since 01 June 2017, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/eccs/663 ; DOI : 10.4000/eccs.663 AFEC RE-INSCRIBING A MONUMENT: VIMY IN THE CANADIAN CONSCIOUSNESS Joan COUTU University of Waterloo This essay focuses on the efficacy of Walter Allward’s immense Canadian National Vimy Memorial built at Vimy Ridge in France and unveiled in 1936. Like other battlefield memorials located far from their primary audiences, the Vimy Memorial must deliberately intervene into Canadian consciousness in order to remain relevant. Drawing on Pierre Nora’s notion of “successive presents,” I examine the means by which that intervention occurs over time and how, also exacerbated by the often great distance between monument and audience, the monument functions as a heterotopic space. The essay also addresses types of memory and consciousness – state, national, collective, and individual – and their inherent malleability, and the points at which they might become fused. Cet article s’intéresse à l’impact de l’immense monument de Walter Allward, construit à Vimy Ridge en France et inauguré en 1936.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Royal Newfoundland Regiment of Fencible Infantry 1803-1816
    The History of Royal Newfoundland Regiment of Fencible Infantry 1803-1816 Grenadier private of the Royal Newfoundland Regiment of Fencible Infantry, 1803-1816 In June, 1803 Brigadier-General John Skerrett, still in command of His Majesty’s troops in the Colony of Newfoundland, was ordered to raise a fencible regiment. This call to arms was consistent with similar arrangements throughout the British Empire in response to aggression by Napoleonic France. Fencible regiments were raised for service in specific colonies. Skerrett was ordered to raise ten companies many of whom were recruited from the Royal Newfoundland Regiment that had been only recently disbanded. The new Regiment was to be the Newfoundland Regiment of Fencible Infantry By 1806, the regiment numbered nearly seven hundred men and were renamed The Royal Newfoundland Regiment when the title “Royal” was conferred by King George III. The next year they were loaded aboard transport ships and sent to Halifax, Nova Scotia where they remained in garrison for one year before being sent to Quebec in 1807. That same year the British Government began the practice of stopping all ships on the high seas, fearing that some might be providing supplies to France. Many Americans were outraged and by 1812 the United States declared war on Great Britain. Because of their extensive experience as both soldiers and sailors, over half of the regiment consisting of five companies, were posted to Kingston, Upper Canada. They served aboard ships. The remaining companies were assigned to detachments at Quebec, Prescott, Fort George and Fort York. RNR Regimental and King's Colours In May 1812, weeks before outbreak of the war with the United States, Major-General Sir Isaac Brock, Commander of his Majesty’s Forces in Upper Canada, divided up the regiment into smaller companies and placed them in defensive positions from Prescott to Amherstburg (at the mouth of the Detroit River).
    [Show full text]
  • Placing Battlefields: Ontario's War of 1812 Niagara
    Placing Battlefields: Ontario’s War of 1812 Niagara Frontier, 1885-1930 by Elaine Young A Thesis Presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Elaine Young, July, 2015 ABSTRACT PLACING BATTLEFIELDS: ONTARIO’S WAR OF 1812 NIAGARA FRONTIER, 1885- 1930 Elaine Young Advisor: University of Guelph, 2015 Dr. Alan Gordon This dissertation investigates former War of 1812 battlefields on the Canadian Niagara Frontier as places, or spaces invested with meaning, focussing on 1885 - 1930. These former battlefields include Fort George, Queenston Heights, Beaverdams, Lundy’s Lane, and Fort Erie. In the mid- 1880s Niagara saw the creation of several local historical societies composed of amateur historians and the Niagara Parks Commission (NPC), which was created to protect Niagara Falls and which eventually acquired most of the Frontier’s former battlefields. As places the former battlefields had complex, layered meanings that shifted over time. They were both places with close connections to the War of 1812, and places of nature and recreation. After the War of 1812 political oratory and early written accounts of the conflict helped establish the war’s public memory, and early monuments and tourism helped to enforce the places’ organic connections to that memory. The local historical societies later reinforced these links by erecting monuments on the former battlefields and holding commemorative ceremonies there. The places were important in reflecting and shaping the war’s public memory, as the monuments were erected on the their highest points and speakers at the ceremonies drew on the places to add weight to a public memory stressing sacrifice, loyalty, Britishness, manliness, and peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Nation-Building Through Ottawa's Memorial Landscape
    Études canadiennes / Canadian Studies Revue interdisciplinaire des études canadiennes en France 78 | 2015 Presque dix ans déjà : le nouveau Canada de Stephen Harper Forging an Identity in Bronze : Nation-Building Through Ottawa’s Memorial Landscape Sculpter une identité dans le bronze : célébration de la nation à travers le paysage mémoriel d’Ottawa Eric Weeks Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/eccs/496 DOI: 10.4000/eccs.496 ISSN: 2429-4667 Publisher Association française des études canadiennes (AFEC) Printed version Date of publication: 1 June 2015 Number of pages: 49-75 ISSN: 0153-1700 Electronic reference Eric Weeks, « Forging an Identity in Bronze : Nation-Building Through Ottawa’s Memorial Landscape », Études canadiennes / Canadian Studies [Online], 78 | 2015, Online since 01 June 2016, connection on 02 May 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/eccs/496 ; DOI : 10.4000/eccs.496 AFEC FORGING AN IDENTITY IN BRONZE : NATION-BUILDING THROUGH OTTAWA’S MEMORIAL LANDSCAPE Eric WEEKS Bridgewater State University This article examines the physical changes to the memorials in Canada’s capital region, as well as the motives driving those additions and modifications. In recent years, Ottawa’s memorial landscape has changed in a number of profound ways. Memorials are just as much a reflection of who or what they commemorate as they are of the time in which they were built, as well as the ideologies and interests of the people who play a role in the development and design process. Moreover, a city’s memorials, particularly those in a national capital, are a part of the everyday environment and the broader cultural fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Commemoration of the Bicentennial of the War of 1812 July 2011 to March 2014 Evaluation Services Directorate N
    Evaluation of the Commemoration of the Bicentennial of the War of 1812 July 2011 to March 2014 Evaluation Services Directorate November 3, 2015 Cette publication est également disponible en français. This publication is available in accessible PDF format on the Internet at http://www.pch.gc.ca © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Catalogue No. CH7-29/2015E-PDF ISBN: 978-0-660-03486-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... I 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. PROFILE OF THE 1812 COMMEMORATION INITIATIVE ....................................... 2 2.1. Background and Context ................................................................................................................ 2 2.2. Objectives and Outcomes ............................................................................................................... 4 2.3. Secretariat Management, Governance, Target Groups, Key Stakeholders & Delivery Partners .. 5 2.4. Secretariat Resources ..................................................................................................................... 6 3. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]