Evaluation of the Commemoration of the Bicentennial of the War of 1812 July 2011 to March 2014 Evaluation Services Directorate N

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of the Commemoration of the Bicentennial of the War of 1812 July 2011 to March 2014 Evaluation Services Directorate N Evaluation of the Commemoration of the Bicentennial of the War of 1812 July 2011 to March 2014 Evaluation Services Directorate November 3, 2015 Cette publication est également disponible en français. This publication is available in accessible PDF format on the Internet at http://www.pch.gc.ca © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, Catalogue No. CH7-29/2015E-PDF ISBN: 978-0-660-03486-7 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... I 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. PROFILE OF THE 1812 COMMEMORATION INITIATIVE ....................................... 2 2.1. Background and Context ................................................................................................................ 2 2.2. Objectives and Outcomes ............................................................................................................... 4 2.3. Secretariat Management, Governance, Target Groups, Key Stakeholders & Delivery Partners .. 5 2.4. Secretariat Resources ..................................................................................................................... 6 3. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................... 8 3.1. Evaluation Scope, Timing and Quality Control ............................................................................. 8 3.2. Evaluation Questions by Issue Area ............................................................................................... 9 3.3. Evaluation Methods ...................................................................................................................... 11 4. FINDINGS – RELEVANCE ............................................................................................... 13 5. FINDINGS – PERFORMANCE ......................................................................................... 15 5.1. Core Issue: Achievement of Expected Outcomes ......................................................................... 15 5.2. Core Issue: Demonstration of Efficiency and Economy ............................................................... 30 6. CONCLUSIONS, GOOD PRACTICES AND LESSONS LEARNED ........................... 35 6.1. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................. 35 6.2. Good Practices and Lessons Learned .......................................................................................... 36 6.3. Recommendations and Management Response ............................................................................ 39 APPENDIX A: LOGIC MODEL .............................................................................................. 42 APPENDIX B: EVALUATION FRAMEWORK .................................................................... 43 APPENDIX C: SECRETARIAT EXPENDITURES, 2010-11 TO 2014-15 .......................... 48 APPENDIX D: BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................ 49 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Expected 1812 Commemoration Outcomes .................................................................................................... 5 Table 2 : Detailed Budgeted Cost for the Secretariat, 2010-11 to 2014/15 ($ Canadian dollars) .................................. 7 Table 3: Overview of Evaluation Issues and Questions .............................................................................................. 10 Table 4: Planned vs Spent Secretariat Expenditures, 2010-11 to 2014-15 ($ Canadian dollars) ................................. 32 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Commemoration of the Bicentennial of the War of 1812 .............................................................................. 4 Figure 2: Types of organizations that received funding from the Secretariat .............................................................. 16 Figure 3: Distribution of G&C funded projects, by Canadian region .......................................................................... 20 Figure 4: Distribution of G&C recipient organizations, by Canadian region .............................................................. 21 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ADM Assistant Deputy Minister CCP Celebration and Commemoration Program EOI Expression of interest EBP Employee Benefit Plan ESD Evaluation Services Directorate G&C Grants and contributions GoC Government of Canada ICC Interdepartmental Commemoration Committee IWG Interdepartmental Working Group on the War of 1812 KII Key informant interviews O&M Operating and Maintenance OPI Office of Prime Interest PCH Department of Canadian Heritage SAP System Analysis and Program Development SMEC Sport, Major Events and Commemorations TBS Treasury Board Secretariat Executive Summary Description of the Initiative and Overview of the Evaluation The commemoration of the bicentennial of the War of 1812 (“1812 Commemoration”) was a three-year Government of Canada (GoC) initiative that sought both to promote greater awareness, knowledge and understanding of the War of 1812 and also to provide opportunities to engage the Canadian public and target audiences in activities and events related to commemoration of the War of 1812, with a view to strengthening Canadian identity. This was meant to be a one-time commemoration, with no intention of renewal. The 1812 Commemoration was an horizontal initiative delivered by means of activities involving various federal departments and agencies and stakeholders, in fiscal years 2011- 2012 to 2013-2014. Budget 2010 provided incremental funding of $28 over three years, allocated to the Department of Canadian Heritage (PCH) ($17.8 million), the Parks Canada Agency ($9.42 million) and the Canadian War Museum ($718,000). In addition to this incremental funding over three years, programs within PCH, funded War of 1812 activities and events from within existing budgets (e.g. Celebrate and Commemorate Canada, Canadian Studies, Building Communities through Arts and Heritage, Canada Cultural Spaces Fund, etc.). Other federal departments and agencies also developed activities from within their existing budgets over the commemoration period (e.g. National Defence and Canadian Forces, Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada, Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada, Infrastructure Canada, Canada Post Corporation, Royal Canadian Mint, etc.). PCH provided leadership and coordination to the GoC War of 1812 initiatives to stimulate the involvement of federal departments and agencies to increase awareness and appreciation of the importance of the War of 1812 on the evolution of Canada. Funding was used to establish a Federal Secretariat for the Bicentennial of the War of 1812 (“Secretariat”) whose main responsibilities were: to manage the 1812 Commemoration Fund (grants and contributions program); to promote national awareness; and to coordinate federal participation. The Secretariat was housed within the Major Events and Celebrations Branch and the 1812 Commemoration Fund was delivered under the authorities of the PCH Celebration and Commemoration Program (CCP). This evaluation covers the activities of the Federal Secretariat for the Bicentennial of the War of 1812 from July 2011 to March 31, 2014. Its purpose is to inform the GoC on the relevance of the War of 1812 initiatives and the performance of the Secretariat, while providing senior management with reliable, timely information on results achieved and on operational efficiency and economy. The evaluation also focusses on lessons learned and good practices from the 1812 Commemoration that could inform the planning and implementation of similar initiatives in the future. Evaluation findings will feed into the next evaluation of the CCP, scheduled for 2016-2017. i Conducted between February 2014 and March 2015, the evaluation is based on three lines of inquiry: a document and database review; seven case studies designed to gather evidence from G&C funding recipients; and fourteen interviews with key informants, including PCH program managers, directors and external stakeholders. The evaluation was led by the Evaluation Services Directorate (ESD) of PCH, which gathered all information associated with the three lines of inquiry. A private consulting company was entrusted with the review and triangulation of all evidence on hand and with the drafting of an evaluation report. Relevance The 1812 Commemoration initiative highlighted a significant historical moment that was key to shaping Canadian identity and was determined to be worthy of commemoration. This initiative was designed and implemented with a view to strengthening Canadian identity and presenting Canadians from across the country with opportunities to become more aware of a defining moment in Canadian history and to participate in its celebration. The 1812 Commemoration initiative was both aligned with PCH’s priority to encourage “Canadians to share, express and appreciate their Canadian identity,” and consistent with stated GoC priorities. The initiative was also envisioned as a key event leading towards the celebration of Canada’s 150th anniversary, in 2017. Performance The evaluation found
Recommended publications
  • Monuments and Memories in Ontario, 1850-2001
    FORGING ICONOGRAPHIES AND CASTING COLONIALISM: MONUMENTS AND MEMORIES IN ONTARIO, 1850-2001 By Brittney Anne Bos A thesis submitted to the Department of History In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (September 2016) Copyright ©Brittney Anne Bos, 2016 ii Abstract Commemorations are a critical window for exploring the social, political, and cultural trends of a specific time period. Over the past two centuries, the commemorative landscape of Ontario reaffirmed the inclusion/exclusion of particular racial groups. Intended as static markers to the past, monuments in particular visually demonstrated the boundaries of a community and acted as ongoing memorials to existing social structures. Using a specific type of iconography and visual language, the creators of monuments imbued the physical markers of stone and bronze with racialized meanings. As builders were connected with their own time periods and social contexts, the ideas behind these commemorations shifted. Nonetheless, creators were intent on producing a memorial that educated present and future generations on the boundaries of their “imagined communities.” This dissertation considers the carefully chosen iconographies of Ontario’s monuments and how visual symbolism was attached to historical memory. Through the examination of five case studies, this dissertation examines the shifting commemorative landscape of Ontario and how memorials were used to mark the boundaries of communities. By integrating the visual analysis of monuments and related images, it bridges a methodological and theoretical gap between history and art history. This dissertation opens an important dialogue between these fields of study and demonstrates how monuments themselves are critical “documents” of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizontal Initiatives
    Horizontal Initiatives Name of Horizontal Initiative: Bicentennial Commemoration of the War of 1812 Name of Lead Department(s): Department of Canadian Heritage Lead Department Program Activity: Promotion and Attachment to Canada Start Date: July 13, 2011 End Date: March 31, 2014 Total Federal Funding Allocation (from start date to end date): $28 million Description of the Horizontal Initiative (including funding agreement): The commemoration of the War of 1812 provides Canadians across the country with a unique opportunity to participate in national and local initiatives to highlight this defining moment in our history. Acting as the focal point for the Government of Canada War of 1812 initiatives, the Department of Canadian Heritage (PCH) provides leadership and coordination to stimulate involvement of federal departments and agencies to increase awareness and appreciation of the importance of the War of 1812 on the evolution of Canada. Canadian Heritage is working closely with federal departments and agencies to create commemorations worthy of this important milestone and to generate excitement about our country and its history among all Canadians. Budget 2010 provided incremental funding of $28 million over three years, allocated to the Department of Canadian Heritage ($17.8 million), the Parks Canada Agency ($9.42 million) and the Canadian War Museum ($780,000). In addition to this incremental funding, existing programs within the Department of Canadian Heritage are funding War of 1812 initiatives from within existing budgets. Other federal departments and agencies are also developing activities from within their existing budgets. Shared Outcome(s): There are three levels of shared outcomes as identified below: Final Outcomes: • Canadians have an increased awareness of their history as it relates to the War of 1812.
    [Show full text]
  • NCC Tender File # AL1509 Project Description War of 1812 Monument
    NCC Tender File # AL1509 Project Description War of 1812 Monument – Site Construction A MANDATORY site visit will be held on Wednesday, April 23, 2014 at 1:30pm Ottawa time. The exact meeting place is in front of East Block on Parliament Hill, Ottawa, ON. All costs incurred by the Bidder to attend the site visit will be at their expense. The NCC will not reimburse any Bidder for expenses related to the site visit. Site Visit To confirm your attendance at this site visit and to gain access to the grounds please communicate with Marie-Andrée Bureau at 613-239- 5678 ext. 5268 or by email at [email protected] . Please note that all visits to “secure” sites (official residences and Parliament Hill) shall be coordinated with, and approved by NCC Corporate Security. Mrs. Bureau will be communicating your presence to NCC Corporate Security. Closing date and time April 29, 2014 at 3pm Ottawa time April 14, 2014 INVITATION TO TENDER & ACCEPTANCE FORM RETURN TENDERS TO: National Capital Commission NCC Tender Number 40 Elgin Street, 3rd Floor, Service Centre AL1509 Ottawa, ON K1P 1C7 NCC Contract Number TENDER CLOSING DATE April 29, 2014 AND TIME: at 3:00 p.m., Ottawa time DESCRIPTION OF WORK: War of 1812 Monument – Site Construction 1. BUSINESS NAME AND ADDRESS OF BIDDER Name: Address: Telephone number: Fax number: 2. THE OFFER The Bidder offers to the National Capital Commission (NCC) to perform and complete the work for the above mentioned project in accordance with the tender documents for the total tender amount (to be expressed in numbers only) of: Sub Total $ HST – 13% $ TOTAL $ 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Memorials Rideau Canal Ride
    Hull Barracks Canadian War War Never Again Museum Regiment de Hull Tank Memorial Office Buildings and Canadian Phalanx National War Memorial Ottawa Military Memorials Ottawa River Ride War of 1812 Monument Peace Tower The Valiants Tomb of the Unknown Soldier Ottawa River Ride Hull Armory • Never Again War Memorial to Peace and Remembrance • Le Regiment de Hull tanks Richmond Landing • Royal Canadian Navy Monument Canadian War Museum • Museum • Memorial Hall Wellington and Lyon • Memorial Office Buildings • Canadian Phalanx Parliament Hill • War of 1812 Monument • Peace Tower Confederation Square • National War Memorial (The Response) • Tomb of the Unknown Soldier • The Valiants Memorial Peace Garden Colonel John By Peacekeeping Memorial Ottawa Memorial Chemical Warfare Ottawa Military Memorials Sussex Drive Ride Mackenzie Papineau Memorial CANLOAN Memorial Flanders Memorial Defence Artillery Memorial Tomb of the Unknown Soldier Sussex Drive Ride Confederation Square •National War Memorial (The Response) •Tomb of the Unknown Soldier •The Valiants Memorial Major’s Hill Park •Colonel By Statue National Gallery of Canada •Reconciliation (Peacekeeping Monument) NRC Sussex Drive •Chemical Warfare Volunteers •Defence of Hong Kong Memorial (southeast corner of King Edward & Sussex) Green Island •National Artillery Memorial •Remember Flanders (John McCrae) •MacKenzie Papineau Memorial •Ottawa Memorial to Commonwealth Air Forces •Peace Garden Sussex and Stanley Ave. • CANLOAN Memorial (southwest corner at start of bike path) Veterans Grove Cartier
    [Show full text]
  • November 16 • Louis Riel Day Full Coverage on Pages 9-16, 32
    Issue No. 83, Winter 2014 NOVEMBER 16 • LOUIS RIEL DAY FULL COVERAGE ON paGES 9-16, 32 Executive members of the MNO Veterans’ Council, (left to right) MNO Veteran Tim Majovsky, President Joseph Paquette and Senator Dr. Alis Kennedy lay wreaths at the “Northwest Rebellion” monument at the provincial Louis Riel Day ceremony at Queen’s Park in Toronto. MEETING MATTAWA SISTERS IN HARVEST WITH NIPISSING SPIRIT BOUNTY PREMIER Historic research report Vigils in honour of Stories about hunting MNO-Ontario meeting released on Ontario missing and murdered the mighty moose advances Métis issues Métis community Aboriginal women Page 3 Page 5 Page 19 Page 29 Métis Voyageur 2 Winter 2014, Issue no. 83 The Métis Voyageur FAMILY Winter 2014, No. 83 Produced by the Métis Nation of Ontario Communications Branch: Julie Cruikshank Jennifer & David Mike Fedyk Marc St. Germain New addition to Sara Kelly Contributors tie the knot! the Métis family Bobbi Aubin Tracy Bald Art Bennett Valerie Boese Matthew Bombardier Rachelle Brunelle-McColl Jerry Clarke Richard Cuddy Rochelle Ethier Kirk Fournier Greg Garratt A.G. Gauthier Reta Gordon Sheila Grantham Richard Gravelle Christina Hodgins-Stewart Yvonne Jensen Alain Lefebvre Gary Lipinski Jennifer Lord Sahra MacLean Jason Madden Rick Meilleur Benny Michaud Patti Moreau Atlas Martin. Jennifer Nicholson Kaitlyn Ouimette Joan Panizza Jennifer Nicholson (Henry) and David Nicholson submitted by | Valerie Boose Joseph Paquette on their wedding day. Jennifer Parkinson We would like to welcome the of Huguette and Douglas Boese, Robin Pilon newest addition to the Métis nephew to Kevin Boese and Bar- Jordi Playne | Joseph Poitras submitted by Jennifer Nicholson family, Atlas Martin.
    [Show full text]
  • London Journal of Canadian Studies Article
    London Journal of Canadian Studies Article Memorializing an Ideal: Representations of Inclusivity in Canada’s National Public Monuments Eric Weeks1,* How to cite: Weeks, E., ‘Memorializing an Ideal: Representations of Inclusivity in Canada’s National Public Monuments.’ London Journal of Canadian Studies, 2019, 34(1), pp. 123–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2019v34.007. Published: 14 November 2019 Peer Review: This article has been peer reviewed through the journal’s standard double-blind peer-review, where both the reviewers and authors are anonymized during review. Copyright: © 2019, The Author(s). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2019v34.007. Open Access: London Journal of Canadian Studies is a peer-reviewed open access journal. * Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Bridgewater State University, USA Memorializing an Ideal: Representations of Inclusivity in Canada’s National Public Monuments Eric Weeks Abstract In every corner of every town and city, memorials can be found existing in a variety of forms and serving a variety of functions. From small plaques or roadside markers to grand monuments commemo- rating a national or global event, they attempt to remind the public of individuals or a shared history. However, memorials also perform another role, and that is to not only record and display those subjects which a society deems worthy of commemoration, but also how those histories are shaped, framed and positioned to fit contemporary needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Inscribing a Monument: Vimy in the Canadian Consciousness La Réinscription D’Un Monument: Vimy Dans La Conscience Canadienne
    Études canadiennes / Canadian Studies Revue interdisciplinaire des études canadiennes en France 80 | 2016 Le Canada et la Grande Guerre Re-inscribing a Monument: Vimy in the Canadian Consciousness La réinscription d’un monument: Vimy dans la conscience canadienne Joan Coutu Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/eccs/663 DOI: 10.4000/eccs.663 ISSN: 2429-4667 Publisher Association française des études canadiennes (AFEC) Printed version Date of publication: 1 June 2016 Number of pages: 67-88 ISSN: 0153-1700 Electronic reference Joan Coutu, « Re-inscribing a Monument: Vimy in the Canadian Consciousness », Études canadiennes / Canadian Studies [Online], 80 | 2016, Online since 01 June 2017, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/eccs/663 ; DOI : 10.4000/eccs.663 AFEC RE-INSCRIBING A MONUMENT: VIMY IN THE CANADIAN CONSCIOUSNESS Joan COUTU University of Waterloo This essay focuses on the efficacy of Walter Allward’s immense Canadian National Vimy Memorial built at Vimy Ridge in France and unveiled in 1936. Like other battlefield memorials located far from their primary audiences, the Vimy Memorial must deliberately intervene into Canadian consciousness in order to remain relevant. Drawing on Pierre Nora’s notion of “successive presents,” I examine the means by which that intervention occurs over time and how, also exacerbated by the often great distance between monument and audience, the monument functions as a heterotopic space. The essay also addresses types of memory and consciousness – state, national, collective, and individual – and their inherent malleability, and the points at which they might become fused. Cet article s’intéresse à l’impact de l’immense monument de Walter Allward, construit à Vimy Ridge en France et inauguré en 1936.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Royal Newfoundland Regiment of Fencible Infantry 1803-1816
    The History of Royal Newfoundland Regiment of Fencible Infantry 1803-1816 Grenadier private of the Royal Newfoundland Regiment of Fencible Infantry, 1803-1816 In June, 1803 Brigadier-General John Skerrett, still in command of His Majesty’s troops in the Colony of Newfoundland, was ordered to raise a fencible regiment. This call to arms was consistent with similar arrangements throughout the British Empire in response to aggression by Napoleonic France. Fencible regiments were raised for service in specific colonies. Skerrett was ordered to raise ten companies many of whom were recruited from the Royal Newfoundland Regiment that had been only recently disbanded. The new Regiment was to be the Newfoundland Regiment of Fencible Infantry By 1806, the regiment numbered nearly seven hundred men and were renamed The Royal Newfoundland Regiment when the title “Royal” was conferred by King George III. The next year they were loaded aboard transport ships and sent to Halifax, Nova Scotia where they remained in garrison for one year before being sent to Quebec in 1807. That same year the British Government began the practice of stopping all ships on the high seas, fearing that some might be providing supplies to France. Many Americans were outraged and by 1812 the United States declared war on Great Britain. Because of their extensive experience as both soldiers and sailors, over half of the regiment consisting of five companies, were posted to Kingston, Upper Canada. They served aboard ships. The remaining companies were assigned to detachments at Quebec, Prescott, Fort George and Fort York. RNR Regimental and King's Colours In May 1812, weeks before outbreak of the war with the United States, Major-General Sir Isaac Brock, Commander of his Majesty’s Forces in Upper Canada, divided up the regiment into smaller companies and placed them in defensive positions from Prescott to Amherstburg (at the mouth of the Detroit River).
    [Show full text]
  • Placing Battlefields: Ontario's War of 1812 Niagara
    Placing Battlefields: Ontario’s War of 1812 Niagara Frontier, 1885-1930 by Elaine Young A Thesis Presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Elaine Young, July, 2015 ABSTRACT PLACING BATTLEFIELDS: ONTARIO’S WAR OF 1812 NIAGARA FRONTIER, 1885- 1930 Elaine Young Advisor: University of Guelph, 2015 Dr. Alan Gordon This dissertation investigates former War of 1812 battlefields on the Canadian Niagara Frontier as places, or spaces invested with meaning, focussing on 1885 - 1930. These former battlefields include Fort George, Queenston Heights, Beaverdams, Lundy’s Lane, and Fort Erie. In the mid- 1880s Niagara saw the creation of several local historical societies composed of amateur historians and the Niagara Parks Commission (NPC), which was created to protect Niagara Falls and which eventually acquired most of the Frontier’s former battlefields. As places the former battlefields had complex, layered meanings that shifted over time. They were both places with close connections to the War of 1812, and places of nature and recreation. After the War of 1812 political oratory and early written accounts of the conflict helped establish the war’s public memory, and early monuments and tourism helped to enforce the places’ organic connections to that memory. The local historical societies later reinforced these links by erecting monuments on the former battlefields and holding commemorative ceremonies there. The places were important in reflecting and shaping the war’s public memory, as the monuments were erected on the their highest points and speakers at the ceremonies drew on the places to add weight to a public memory stressing sacrifice, loyalty, Britishness, manliness, and peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Nation-Building Through Ottawa's Memorial Landscape
    Études canadiennes / Canadian Studies Revue interdisciplinaire des études canadiennes en France 78 | 2015 Presque dix ans déjà : le nouveau Canada de Stephen Harper Forging an Identity in Bronze : Nation-Building Through Ottawa’s Memorial Landscape Sculpter une identité dans le bronze : célébration de la nation à travers le paysage mémoriel d’Ottawa Eric Weeks Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/eccs/496 DOI: 10.4000/eccs.496 ISSN: 2429-4667 Publisher Association française des études canadiennes (AFEC) Printed version Date of publication: 1 June 2015 Number of pages: 49-75 ISSN: 0153-1700 Electronic reference Eric Weeks, « Forging an Identity in Bronze : Nation-Building Through Ottawa’s Memorial Landscape », Études canadiennes / Canadian Studies [Online], 78 | 2015, Online since 01 June 2016, connection on 02 May 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/eccs/496 ; DOI : 10.4000/eccs.496 AFEC FORGING AN IDENTITY IN BRONZE : NATION-BUILDING THROUGH OTTAWA’S MEMORIAL LANDSCAPE Eric WEEKS Bridgewater State University This article examines the physical changes to the memorials in Canada’s capital region, as well as the motives driving those additions and modifications. In recent years, Ottawa’s memorial landscape has changed in a number of profound ways. Memorials are just as much a reflection of who or what they commemorate as they are of the time in which they were built, as well as the ideologies and interests of the people who play a role in the development and design process. Moreover, a city’s memorials, particularly those in a national capital, are a part of the everyday environment and the broader cultural fabric.
    [Show full text]