DOCSLIB.ORG

The Moment Has Passed Power After Arendt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Moment Has Passed Power After Arendt 4 THE MOMENT HAS PASSED Power after Arendt Patchen Markell “America’s Tahrir Moment”: that’s the title of an Adbusters blog entry from early September 2011. Nobody Can Predict the Moment of Revolution: the title of a short documentary video about Occupy Wall Street produced by some of its participants. “Transforming Occupy Wall Street from a Moment to a Movement”: the headline of a widely circulated article urging the occupiers to organize themselves behind a series of specific progressive demands.1 It’s not hard to understand the appeal of the language of the “moment” as a way of capturing the political rhythms of the past two years, whether in Sidi Bouzid, Oakland, Cairo, London, or lower Manhattan. Against the background of a feeling of political stuckness, of being in a rut you can’t see how to break out of, or of being subject to something—whether it’s an authoritarian dynasty or an economic system—that you feel powerless to contest, political aspiration can take the form of the desire for a moment of radical transformation, of the sudden appearance of new possibilities. Against the same background, promising moments can prove disappoint- ing precisely in their momentariness as old patterns and entrenched powers reassert themselves. Yet the notion of politics as a matter of the sudden and dramatic interruption of ordinary life, whose transformative effects must somehow be made durable without sacrificing what is radical and new in them, comes with significant costs. It has helped to anchor problematic conceptions of the authority of the political theorist: problematic because they fit poorly with the antihierarchical political principles in whose name they are often articulated and problematic because they help to reproduce 113 114 Patchen Markell subtly disempowering pictures of the very things—political power and political agency—that theory often promises to secure. In its militant moods, for example, political theory may claim for itself (or be ascribed by its readers) the capacity to anticipate the moment of genu- inely transformative politics or to announce that moment when it comes, certifying its authenticity, distinguishing it from the spurious nonevents that risk distracting political actors from the real thing, and clarifying, even if only in formal terms, what Marx and Engels called the “line of march” that emancipatory political action must take.2 Of course, contemporary left theory, heir to a century and a half of controversy about the relation of theory to practice, does not naively embrace theoretical avant-gardism. Yet for all its demurrals—“this is not a manifesto,” insist Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri at the beginning of their book-length reflections on the year 2011; “we must be the pupils of these movements, not their stupid teachers,” writes Alain Badiou in his newest book, its dust jacket filled from edge to edge with a photograph of a young protester in front of a burning barricade in Cairo—theory in this mode still falls easily into an imperative voice given force by the urgency of the moment, declaring what the multitudes “must” do to be prepared for transformative events when they arrive or deploying theory to distinguish between dead-end riots that lack “enduring truth” and sudden uprisings that, as genuine events, “signal a reawakening of History.”3 In its more melancholic moods, by contrast, political theory may anchor its authority to the momentariness of the political in a different way. A de- cade and a half ago, after Jeffrey Isaac famously complained about the field’s “strange silence” at what had seemed like another momentous opportunity for political theory to speak to practice,4 Sheldon Wolin replied that this silence grew not out of irresponsibility or hyperprofessionalization, but out of a deeper disjunction between the fast tempo of current events and the slow time of theory. For Wolin, that disjunction didn’t reflect an intrinsic gap between theory and practice; instead, it reflected the contemporary disap- pearance of political theory’s proper object—a displacement in which the slow, deliberative temporality of genuine politics (a temporality that aligns politics with theory) had been increasingly overwhelmed by the frenetic pace of “economy and popular culture.”5 Indeed, thanks to the extraordinary reach and power of the monstrous hybrid of neoliberal capitalism and the impe- rial state that Wolin thinks has helped effect this disappearance and that he now calls “Superpower,” political action can exist only as a brief and fragile upsurge of popular resistance, whose momentary and “fugitive” character The Moment Has Passed 115 also seems to render it permanently disappointing.6 For Wolin, the sudden flash of politics is less an occasion for the theorist to give direction than, in its momentariness, testimony to the truth of his diagnosis of our seemingly irreversible loss of a politics of a different, slower, more extended kind. In this essay, I want to try to cast some doubt on the framing of politics in terms of moments—whether extraordinary moments of radical political transformation or more ordinary moments of political action—in some of the discourses that political theory offers us through which to navigate the enthusiasms and disappointments of the contemporary world. To do this and to begin to construct an alternative, I turn to Hannah Arendt’s The Human Condition—perhaps surprisingly, because Arendt herself is often thought to exemplify just the way of thinking I hope to question. Doesn’t Arendt offer us one of postwar political theory’s most vivid accounts of the evisceration of genuine politics in an age of consumer capitalism? And doesn’t she lighten that bleak picture by reminding us of the irrepressible spontaneity of human action, of the power of human beings to break with the given and—in a flash—make a new beginning? Yes and no. For all the importance of Arendt’s account of political action as a new beginning, we misunderstand that account when we see it as a matter of making a leap, in a moment, out of the stuckness of the pres- ent and into a radically different future: that kind of representation of action is not empowering but paralyzing. For Arendt, by contrast, the primary way we experience action is not by finding our way to it when it is absent, but by finding ourselves in the midst of it when we or others have already begun—a locution, notice, that already implies that action has a duration; that it is not just a moment, but a course. We could begin to capture this idea by saying that the moment of political action has always already passed; in fact, as I’ll explain, Arendt herself seems to say something like this. But it is critical not to read that maxim simply as a relocation of the moment of politics from the present or future into some specific time in the past, which would maintain our investment in a problematic picture of the punctuality, the suddenness, of genuine political events.7 And it is equally important not to read that maxim mournfully, as though it were the mark of a perennially missed opportunity or a sign that we’ve always already lost the thing we need.8 Three Uses of “Power” My attempt here to reorient our thinking about politics away from the the- matics of the moment is one part of a larger effort to identify and explore 116 Patchen Markell a dimension of human agency that political theorists too often neglect. We argue about the criteria of agency, about its conditions of possibility, about how to achieve or expand it when it seems threatened, and so on, but these discussions take place mostly against a certain taken-for-granted background picture of what agency is and why it matters, in which agency is treated as a kind of control over the content and direction of what gets done. Agency, in this sense, can make the difference between being directed by one’s own desire or will or interest and being subjected to someone or something else.9 As I have argued elsewhere, the trouble with this picture is less that it is wrong— agency does matter in just this way—than that it is incomplete. We can ask whether an action is controlled by my will or interests or someone else’s, but we can also ask: Whatever it is that’s happening, however it’s being directed, does the carrying-out of this course of action depend on my participation, on my own activity? Does it happen through me, or does it proceed without my involvement?10 (Think here of Alexis de Tocqueville’s dystopic portrait of democratic despotism in the second volume of Democracy in America, in which an immense power “works willingly for [our] happiness” but wants to be not only “the only arbiter” of that happiness—the decider—but also, Tocqueville says, its “sole agent,” thereby relieving us of both the “trouble of thinking and the difficulty of living.”)11 My intuition is that our tendency to reduce questions of agency to questions of control has an affinity with our tendency to frame action in terms of the moment because decision and will, the instrument and medium of control par excellence, are so easily conceived of in punctual terms.12 Conversely, my hope is that Arendt’s displacement of the moment of action from the center of our attention might help bring this other dimension of concern about agency—the dimension of involve- ment—into the foreground, opening up a range of new questions about political action and drawing our attention to some features of contemporary political life that might otherwise escape our notice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Judgment and Imagination in Habermas's Theory of Law Thomas Fossen Institute for Philosophy Leiden University the Final Ve
    Judgment and Imagination in Habermas’s Theory of Law Thomas Fossen Institute for Philosophy Leiden University The final version of this paper was published in Philosophy & Social Criticism: psc.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0191453714566485 Abstract: Recent debates in political theory display a renewed interest in the problem of judgment. This article critically examines the different senses of judgment that are at play in Jürgen Habermas’s theory of law. The paper offers (a) a new critical reading of Habermas’s account of the legitimacy of law, and (b) a revisionary interpretation of the reconstructive approach to political theory that underpins it. Both of these are instrumental to (c) an understanding of what is involved in judging the legitimacy of law that is richer than has been recognized thus far by both critics and defenders of Habermas. Keywords: Habermas, law, legitimacy, judgment, imagination, reconstruction, communicative action, deliberative democracy, agonistic politics Acknowledgments: I am grateful to Joel Anderson, Bert van den Brink, and Patchen Markell for critical discussions and inspiration, and I’ve also benefited from feedback from Wout Cornelissen, J.J. McFadden, Daniel Gaus, David Owen, Martine Prange, Herman Siemens, an anonymous referee, and an audience at the Dutch Research School for Practical Philosophy, especially discussant Stefan Rummens. Thanks also to Ciarán Ó Faoláin for his careful copy-editing. Work on this paper was funded by a grant from the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), entitled “Between Agonism and Deliberation: Rethinking Conflict and its Relation to Law in Political Philosophy.” 1 1. Introduction What is involved in judging the legitimacy of law? Much of the philosophical debate about legitimacy focuses on the content and justification of principles of legitimacy in light of which law (or political authority more broadly) ought to be considered legitimate or illegitimate.
    [Show full text]
  • Tu 3–5 Pm Or by Appointment HANNAH
    Patchen Markell 2-8057, [email protected] Pick Hall 412 Office hours: Tu 3–5 pm or by appointment HANNAH ARENDT’S THE HUMAN CONDITION Political Science 24500 / 34500 / Fundamentals 22212 Spring Quarter 2014 Mondays, 1:30–4:20 pm Wieboldt 408 This seminar will be devoted to a reading of Hannah Arendt’s The Human Condition (1958), one of the most influential works of political theory written in the twentieth century. Topics include: the meaning and function of Arendt’s distinctions among “public,” “private” and “social” and among “labor,” “work,” and “action”; the significance and prospects of human activity, including especially political activity, in modernity; the relation between philosophy and politics in and beyond Athens; the significance of the scientific revolution for modernity; the meanings of work, leisure, and consumption in postwar capitalism; the nature and basis of political power and freedom; the relations between art and politics; and many others. In addition to The Human Condition, we’ll read some supplementary material, which includes work by some of the thinkers with whom Arendt was more or less explicitly in conversation; work by other writers from her era that will help us to situate Arendt in the larger contexts of twentieth-century intellectual life; and more recent writing that will give us different angles on some of the issues in Arendt’s book. This is a limited-enrollment, by-consent seminar, open to advanced undergraduates and to graduate students; in the event of a scarcity of places, some priority may be given to undergraduates. TEXTS: The primary text for the course is Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago, 1958, 2nd ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism's Uneven Revolution: Reflections on Wendy Brown's Undoing the Demos
    Neoliberalism's Uneven Revolution: Reflections on Wendy Brown's Undoing the Demos Patchen Markell Theory & Event, Volume 20, Number 2, April 2017, pp. 520-527 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/655784 Access provided by Hunter College Libraries (30 Jul 2018 16:38 GMT) Neoliberalism’s Uneven Revolution: Reflections on Wendy Brown’s Undoing the Demos Patchen Markell endy Brown’s Undoing the Demos1 tells a big, ambitious, and unfamiliar story about what neoliberalism is, and about Wwhat its ascent means for us. Unlike a lot of lesser books and articles on the subject, its sweep does not come at the cost of being vague, hasty, or gestural. It is, to the contrary, theoretically precise, deliberately paced, and carefully rooted in rich and detailed accounts of our present and our recent past. And, most of all, it is a book that is more than the sum of its individual arguments: to read it is to be drawn into a space and a perspective that will change how you look at the world. In that, I think it is a masterpiece of political theory. The questions and comments posed here about Undoing the Dem- os are meant to be internal to its space—that is, they are meant to be questions and comments of the kind that, on my reading anyway, the book means to provoke or invite. Before posing these questions, then, I need to say something about how I understand Brown’s rhetorical stance in Undoing the Demos, which, if I’m right, may also help avoid a possible misunderstanding of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucerne Master Class 2016 with Prof
    Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences Lucerne Master Class 2016 With Prof. Dr. Axel Honneth Jack C. Weinstein Professor for the Humanities, Columbia University (New York) Professor of Social Philosophy, Goethe University (Frankfurt) Towards a Critical Theory of Markets 2–6 May 2016, University of Lucerne Course Location: Hotel Seeburg, Lucerne Contents: Welcome! 4 Organisation 5 Preparation 6 Axel Honneth & Towards a Critical Theory of Markets 7 Programme Overview 8 Detailed Programme 9 Monday 9 Tuesday 10 Wednesday 11 Thursday 12 Friday 12 Participants & Projects 13 Bader, Daniel 14 Dijkstra, Lizabeth 16 Heiland, Heiner 18 Knobbe, Sonja 20 Léger, Alexandre 22 Niazi, Nahyan 24 Overwijk, Jan 26 Peter, Lukas 28 Møller Stahl, Rune 30 Schmieden, Susanne 32 Teixeira, Pedro 34 Tunderman, Simon 36 Vogel, Tobias 38 Waitkus, Nora 40 Wienhues, Anna 42 3 Welcome! Dear Participants We are pleased to welcome you in Lucerne, Switzerland for the third Lucerne Master Class en- titled Towards a Critical Theory of Markets from 2–6 May 2016! Running annually from 2015–2019 under the general theme The Culture of Markets, the Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences (GSL) at the University of Lucerne will be offering one- week Master Classes, which will offer the opportunity to analyse the variety of virulent problems in the market through a range of scientific perspectives. We wish you all an inspiring and pleasant time at the University of Lucerne and we are looking forward to spending this week with you. Yours sincerely Prof. Dr. Martin Hartmann Professor of Philosophy, Chair for Practical Philosophy at the University of Lucerne.
    [Show full text]
  • Government 4000/6816 Cornell University Fall
    Government 4000/6816 Professor Patchen Markell Cornell University Office hours: Tuesdays, 2–4pm Fall 2021 or by appointment, White Hall 311 [email protected] SEMINAR: ARENDT Mondays, 11:20am–1:50pm, location TBA COURSE DESCRIPTION: This is a seminar on the political thought of Hannah Arendt, meant for advanced undergraduates and graduate students in Government and related fields in the humanities and humanistic social sciences. Prior familiarity with Arendt’s work is not necessary, but some prior work in political theory is required (e.g., Government 1615, for undergraduates). One source of Arendt’s enduring interest as a political theorist lies in the fact that she seemed to understand the meaning of “politics” very differently from many of her contemporaries and predecessors. But if politics is not essentially about the distinction between friends and enemies; or the possession of the legitimate means of violence in a territory; or who gets what, when, and how; or who does what to whom; or the rule of reason in the city and the soul—then what was politics, from Arendt’s perspective? Why did it matter? Was there such a thing as doing politics well or badly? What were the prospects for politics as a distinctive human practice in the post-World War II world? In this seminar we will pursue these and other questions via a slow, chapter-by-chapter reading and discussion of Arendt’s 1958 book The Human Condition, along with a number of other, shorter works of Arendt’s from from the 1940s through the 1970s. These readings will be supplemented by selections from the works of philosophers with whom Arendt was tacitly or explicitly engaged; selections from the writings of some of Arendt’s contemporaries, which will help us situate her work in the political and intellectual landscapes of the postwar world; and a few more recent readings that will give us different angles on some of the subjects Arendt addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Candace A. Vogler Department of Philosophy the University of Chicago 1115 East 58Th Street Chicago, IL 60637
    Curriculum Vitae Candace A. Vogler Department of Philosophy The University of Chicago 1115 East 58th Street Chicago, IL 60637 Academic Appointments David B. and Clara E. Stern Professor of Philosophy, University of Chicago Chair of Virtue Theory, Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues & Fellow, Royal Institute of Philosophy, May 2018-May 2021 Fulbright Distinguished Visiting Professor, University of Notre Dame Australia, August- September 2017 Chair, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 2011-2014 Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 2007-2010 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 2000-2007 Co-Director, Masters of Arts Program in the Humanities, University of Chicago, 2000-2007 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 1994-2000 Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 1992-1994 Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of California, Los Angeles, 1992 Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of California, Davis, 1991 Instructor, Department of Philosophy, Chatham College, 1989 Teaching Fellow, Department of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, 1988-1990 Education University of Pittsburgh (1985-1992), Ph.D., Philosophy, 1994 Ph.D. certificate, Program for the Study of Culture, 1992 Mills College (1978-1981; 1984-1985), B.A. in Philosophy, Honors, 1985 Fellowships and Awards Fulbright Specialist World Learning Roster (2017-present) Distinguished Visiting Faculty, Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues, University
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition and Responsibility
    religions Article Recognition and Responsibility Hille Haker Department of Theology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA; [email protected] Abstract: While the concept of responsibility is a cornerstone of Christian ethics, recognition theory still lacks a thorough theological–ethical analysis. This essay seeks to fill the gap and develop normative ethics of recognition and responsibility. The first part provides a systematic analysis of the conceptual elements of recognition, emphasizing the need to focus on misrecognition as a heuristic tool and ethical priority. While recognition coincides with responsivity and attentiveness in the encounter of self and other, responsibility adds to this the moral accountability for acts, practices, structures, and institutions, rendering recognition and responsibility interrelated but also distinct principles of morality. This normative analysis is then correlated to the hermeneutical, narrative ethics of Christian ethics. The founding narrative of biblical ethics, the Cain and Abel narrative in Gen 4, is interpreted as a dialectic of recognition and responsibility. Both exegesis and ethics profit from this interdisciplinary and correlative approach between philosophical and biblical ethics. Finally, the ethics of recognition and responsibility, which emerges from the Frankfurt School critical theory, is confronted with exemplary indigenous approaches focusing on mutual responsibility as the foundation of ecological ethics. Christian ethics of recognition and responsibility resonates with
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The sources and limits of political enthusiasm Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7x24v971 Author Poe, Andrew Publication Date 2010 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Sources and Limits of Political Enthusiasm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Andrew Poe Committee in charge: Professor Tracy Strong, Chair Professor Fonna Forman-Barzilai Professor Harvey Goldman Professor Patchen Markell Professor Philip Roeder 2010 Copyright Andrew Poe, 2010 All rights reserved The dissertation of Andrew Poe is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii DEDICATION For Alivia, especially for beginning everything by mistakenly saying “I know you!” iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page....................................................................................................................iii Dedication...........................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Political Freedom Between
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO POLITICAL FREEDOM BETWEEN ARENDT AND FOUCAULT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY JOHN U. NEF COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL THOUGHT BY DAWN HERRERA HELPHAND CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments iii Abstract v Chapter One: Liberal Conceptions of Political Freedom: Property, Sovereignty, State 1 Chapter Two: Freedom Between Arendt and Foucault: Problematics and Possibilities 48 Chapter Three: Freedom as Practice 118 Chapter Four: The Free Subject in Play 153 Chapter Five: State, Race, Violence 202 Chapter Six: Freedom as Event 248 ii I owe an immense debt of gratitude to the teachers, mentors and friends who have guided me in the completion of this project. I would like to thank my Chair, Nathan Tarcov, for his trust in my capacity, his steadying hand when I myself doubted it, and for the care he has taken with my work; Patchen Markell, whose subtle insight and breadth of knowledge, have been matched only by his profound generosity; and Bernard Harcourt, who from the beginning has directed me straight to the heart of the matter and encouraged me to embrace my vision as my own. Thank you all for challenging and supporting me. I am truly fortunate to have had the opportunity to work with you: your friendship and advice are an inestimable gift. Thank you to the Committee on Social Thought, for providing my colleagues and I with that rarest, most precious scholarly resource: space to think. For helping me find my footing there I am deeply indebted to the late Paul Friedrich, a great soul and a dear friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Goldman CV January 2019
    Loren Goldman Department of Political Science University of Pennsylvania The Ronald O. Perelman Center for Political Science and Economics 133 S. 36th St. Philadelphia, PA 19104-6215 Academic Employment Since 2016. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Assistant Professor of Political Science (tenure track). 2013-2016. Ohio University, Athens, OH. Visiting Assistant Professor of Political Science. 2011-2013. University of California, Berkeley. Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow in the Humanities, Department of Rhetoric. 2010-2011. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Cultural Analysis. Education 2003-2010. University of Chicago. Ph. D. (2010), M.A. (2005), Political Science. Dissertation: “The Sources of Political Hope: Will, World and Democracy.” Committee: Patchen Markell (Chair), Robert Gooding-Williams, John P. McCormick, Robert Pippin. Comprehensive Exams: Political Theory, Comparative Politics (distinction). 2001-2003. University of Oxford. M.Phil., Politics. Thesis: "Organic Analogies and The New Liberalism." Supervisor: Michael Freeden Exams: Contemporary Political Theory, Political Philosophy from Machiavelli to Burke, Political Theories of Hegel and Marx, Political Institutions. 2000-2001. Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität-Frankfurt, Germany. DAAD Jahresstipendiat, Philosophie, 2000-2001. With Prof. Axel Honneth. 1996-2000. Yale University. B.A., Political Science. Cum laude, with honors in the major. Senior Thesis: “Tending to the Extremes: Aesthetic Epistemology, Mass Culture and the Dialectics of Emancipation in the Work of Theodor W. Adorno.” Research and Teaching Interests Political Theory, History of Political Thought, American Pragmatism, Critical Theory, Democratic Theory, German Idealism, Utopian Thought. Loren Goldman, Curriculum Vitae 2 Publications [Refereed Articles in Journals] -- “Richard Rorty’s ‘Post-Kantian’ Philosophy of History.” Journal of The Philosophy of History 9:3, 2015, 410-443.
    [Show full text]
  • Arendtian Contributions to Liberal Political Theory
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2006 Arendtian contributions to liberal political theory Sarah M. McGrath The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation McGrath, Sarah M., "Arendtian contributions to liberal political theory" (2006). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5251. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5251 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD) LIBRARY The University o f Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission >< No, I do not grant permission ______ ~ S. Author's Signature;. — ^ ^ ) Date: ^ ~ ^ - Q£>____________ Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. 8/98 ARENDTIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO LIBERAL POLITICAL THEORY by Sarah M. McGrath B.S. Grand Valley State University, 2002 B.A. Grand Valley State University, 2003 presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana July 2006 Approved by: Chairperson Dean, Graduate School 2 S -o £ Date UMI Number: EP40715 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Theory
    ANDREW DILTS, PH.D. [email protected] – [email protected] – https://dilts.org/ tel: +1.310.338.5165 / fax: +1.310.338.2356 Loyola Marymount University Department of Political Science 1 LMU Drive, Los Angeles, CA, 90045, USA AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION AREAS OF COMPETENCY Political Theory (modern & contemporary), Critical Carceral American Political Development, Queer Theory, American Studies, Critical Race Theory, Race, Ethnicity, & Politics Political Thought, Feminist Theory, Democratic Theory, Critical Theory, Punishment Theory Ancient & Medieval Political Theory, Philosophy of Law, Public Law & Judicial Politics, Law & Society ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Loyola Marymount University Associate Professor (tenured), 2017-present. Department of Political Science Bellarmine College of Liberal Arts Assistant Professor, 2011-2017. Los Angeles, CA London School of Economics Visiting Senior Fellow, Spring 2018. Department of Government London, UK Institute for Advanced Study Member, 2016-2017. School of Social Science Princeton, NJ The University of Chicago Collegiate Assistant Professor & Harper-Schmidt Fellow, 2008-2011. Social Sciences Collegiate Division & Society of Fellows in the Liberal Arts Chicago, IL EDUCATION The University of Chicago Doctor of Philosophy, 2008 Division of the Social Sciences, Dissertation: “Excess Punishment: State, Citizens, & Felon Disenfranchisement” Department of Political Science Committee: Patchen Markell (chair), Robert Gooding-Williams, & Bernard Harcourt. Qualifying exams passed in Political Theory and U.S. Politics. Master of Arts, 2004 Masters Thesis: “Being/Becoming Felon: Identity and Felon Disenfranchisement,” Readers: Cathy J. Cohen & Patchen Markell. Indiana University, Bloomington Bachelor of Arts with High Distinction, 2002 College of Arts and Sciences Wells Scholar Class of 1998; Major in Economics with Departmental Honors. London School of Economics Visiting Student, 2000-2001.
    [Show full text]