DOCSLIB.ORG

Dege CV 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dege CV 2021 CARMEN LEA DEGE Polonsky AcademyVan Leer Jerusalem Institute Phone: +972 58-6617927 43 Jabotinsky St., P.O. Box 4070 Email: [email protected] Jerusalem 9214116, Israel Website: www.carmendege.com APPOINTMENTS Polonsky Postdoctoral Fellow at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute, 2019-present EDUCATION Yale University, Ph.D. Political Science, 2019 Dissertation: “The Ethos of Non-Indifference: Max Weber’s Challenge and Karl Jaspers’s Response” Committee: Seyla Benhabib (chair), Karuna Mantena, Philip Gorski, Maeve Cooke (University College Dublin), External Reader: Giulia Oskian Parental Leave: Spring/Summer 2014; Medical Leave: Fall 2014 – Summer 2015 University of Chicago, M.A. Social Sciences, 2010 M.A. Thesis: “Zionism Reconsidered – Karl Marx and Emmanuel Levinas on Humanism and the Possibility of Ethics” Advisor: Patchen Markell Freie Universität Berlin, M.A. Political Science, 2009 M.A. Thesis: “The Lie and the Political: Freedom and Security in a State of Prevention” B.A. Thesis: “The Torture Scandals of Abu Ghraib – A Socio-Psychological Perspective” PUBLICATIONS !""#$%&%!""#%'()*+,-$% “Loss of World not Certainty: Amor Mundi and the Moral Psychology of Seyla Benhabib,” in In Search of the Concrete Universal: Festschrift for Seyla Benhabib, edited by Anna Jurkevics and Stefan Eich, publisher TBD. Die Lüge und das Politische. Freiheit und Sicherheit in der Präventionsgesellschaft, Gießen: Psychosozial-Verlag, 2010. [The Lie and the Political. Freedom and Security in a State of Prevention] .,,-/0,12,3,4%5-+267,$% “Diversity in Unity in Disenchanted Times: Max Weber’s Challenge and Karl Jaspers’s Response,” Philosophy & Social Criticism, 46(6), 2020, 703-33. 8"9/*,,-/0,12,3,4%5-+267,$% “Foucault and Humanism: Meditations on an Ethos of Limit,” Journal of Political Thought, 1(1), 2015, 18-36. 0,12,3$%&%:$$);$ “To Karl Jaspers, uncertainty is not to be overcome but understood,” Aeon+Psyche, September 9, 2020. “2020’s Existentialist Turn” Boston Review, August 24, 2020; among the top 10 most popular articles of 2020. (Chinese Translation, West Philosophy Wechat; Spanish Translation, La Maletta de Portbou.) Dege - 1 “Bound by Disenchantment, Review of This Life: Secular Faith and Spiritual Freedom, by Martin Hägglund,” New Rambler Review, September 18, 2019. <)9=$6-2*+$%&%>"-#$%29%.-"?-,$$ “‘Standing behind your phrase’ – Arendt and Jaspers on the (Post-)Metaphysics of Evil,” Review & Resubmit at European Journal of Political Theory. “Myth, Modernity, and the Legacy of the Axial Age,” submitted to the Journal of the History of Ideas. “Jaspers and the Diagnosis of His Times,” book chapter in the Anthem Companion to Karl Jaspers, edited by Hans Joas and Matthias Bormuth, due December 2021. “The Dialectic of Enlightenment Revisisted, Review of Splinters in Your Eye: Frankfurt School Provocations, by Martin Jay,” submission to Studies in Social and Political Thought, due November 2021. “Science Denialism and Political Myth: Studying the Workings and Breakdowns of the Fact-Value Dichotomy,” paper draft for the 2021 Association for Political Theory Conference, November 2021. “Resentment, Guilt, and the Critique of Authoritarianism: Karl Jaspers and Critical Theory,” paper draft, presented in substantial parts at the Association of Political Theory Conference 2019. SELECTED CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP PRESENTATIONS Presenter, “To Deny, Downplay or Disinform about Covid-19: Studying the Workings and Breakdowns of the Fact-Value Dichotomy,” Lecture Series “Politische Falschheiten. Diagnosen und Konzepte,” Goethe University of Frankfurt, June 2021 (on Zoom). Presenter, “Jaspers in the Anthropocene: Meditations on the (Post)Human,” Karl Jaspers Society of North America Conference, “The Cyborg and Existential Becoming: Exploring Posthumanism with Jaspers,” April 2021 (on Zoom). Presenter, “‘Standing behind your phrase’ – Arendt and Jaspers on the (Post-)Metaphysics of Evil,” Hannah Arendt Workshop Leiden, Netherlands, February 2020 & March 2021 (on Zoom). Presenter, “Seyla Benhabib’s Moral Psychology,” Conference in Honor of Seyla Benhabib, December 2020 (on Zoom). Presenter, “The Dialectic of Enlightenment: Critical Theory and the Myth of the Axial Age,” American Political Science Association Annual Conference, September 2020 & Lecture Series in Political Thought and Intellectual History at Hebrew University, November 2020 (on Zoom). Presenter, “Resentment, Anger, and Guilt: Karl Jaspers’s Reflections on Wounded Attachments and Post- Truth Politics,” Association of Political Theory Conference, Irvine, CA, October 2019. Presenter, “Reason After It’s Eclipse: The Turn to Communicative Action Revisited,” Philosophy and Social Science Colloquium, Prague, Czech Republic, May 2019. Organizer and Presenter, Roundtable Discussion, “Leading the People: On the Centennial of Max Weber’s ‘Politics as a Vocation’,” American Political Science Association Annual Conference, Washington, DC, August/September 2019, with Joshua Cherniss, Stefan Eich, Pratap Bhanu Mehta, David Owen, Shalini Satkunanandan. Presenter, “Populism in Secular Times: Karl Jaspers on Difference, Identity and Philosophical Faith,” Yale Macmillan Center Initiative on Religion, Politics & Society, Populism and Pluralism Conference, New Haven, CT, May 2018. Presenter, “Between Immanence and Transcendence – Charles Taylor and Karl Jaspers on the Axial Age,” Western Political Science Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA, March 2018. Dege - 2 Organizer and Presenter, Roundtable Discussion, “The Challenge of the Other: European Identity and the Refugee Crisis,” American Political Science Association Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA, September 2016, with Seyla Benhabib, Ayten Gundogdu, Anna Jurkevics, Paul Linden-Retek and Peter Verovšek. Presenter, “Karl Jaspers on the Communication of Taste, the Sublime, and Aesthetic Truth,” Questioning Aesthetics Symposium, University College Dublin, Ireland, May 2016. Presenter, “The Variety of Spiritual Experience – Meditations on Ludwig Wittgenstin, William James, and Albert Camus,” Invited Talk at Sunday Assembly Berlin, Germany, September 2015. Presenter, “Emmanuel Levinas’s Ethics as First Philosophy,” Transcendence and Political Philosophy Workshop, University College Dublin, Ireland, November 2013. Presenter, “The Child as an Other and the Problem of Autonomy,” Psychology and the Other Annual Conference, Boston, MA, October 2013. Presenter, “Situating the Other – the Ethical Turn Reconsidered,” Midwest Political Science Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, April 2013. Presenter, “Oslo Revisited – A Philosophical Critique of the Two-State Solution,” Midwest Political Science Association Annual Conference, Chicago, IL, April 2010. TEACHING EXPERIENCE Teaching Areas: History of Political Thought, Contemporary Political Theory; Critical Theory; German Political Philosophy; Democratic Theory; Political Theology; Existentialism. Teaching Activity: Department of Political Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Lecturer) • The Politics of Loss: Fear, Resentment and Mourning in Public Life, Spring 2022, • State of Emergency, Plague, and White Gaze: What Existentialism Teaches Us About Crisis, Spring 2021. Department of Political Science, Yale University (Teaching Fellow) • The Moral Foundations of Politics, Spring 2019, • Legacies of Communism and Conflict in Europe, Fall 2018, • The New Europe, Spring 2018, • Introduction to International Law, Fall 2015, • The Moral Foundations of Politics, Fall 2013. Spring School @2)7"?*,-$*,#+21,9, Ernst Ludwig Ehrlich Foundation: “Theokratie – ein Gedankenexperiment” [Theocracy – a Thought Experiment] (Lecturer) • Religion, Difference and Democracy: Pluralism in Times of Populism and Identity Politics, March 2018 (Graduate Seminar). Summer School, German Academic Scholarship Foundation (Lecturer) • Google and the Shitting Duck: The History of Mechanization and Technology, August 2014. Department of Political Science, Freie Universität Berlin (Lecturer) • The Politics of Obedience, Authority, and Violence, Summer 2011, • Nationalism and State-Building in the Middle East, Winter 2010/2011. Dege - 3 PROFESSIONAL SERVICE Conference organization (including grant organization): • “Force of Myth: Authority, Illusion, and Critique in Modern Imaginaries,” Van Leer Jerusalem Institute, June 2021 (on Zoom) • “23rd Annual Critical Theory Roundtable,” Yale University, 2015 • “Rawls Festtage,” Yale University, 2013 • “Walls and Fences: The Ethics and Politics of Border Barriers,” Yale University, 2012 • “Können Marginalisierte (wieder)sprechen? Zum politischen Potenzial der Sozialwissenschaften” [“Can the Marginalized Speak? On the Political Potential of the Social Sciences”], Freie Universität Berlin, 2008 Workshops, Conversations, and Reading Groups: • (Co-)Founder and organizer of ongoing reading groups: “Karl Jaspers Reading Group,” active since August 2020; “Critical Theory Reading Group,” active since April 2021 (on Zoom) • Polonsky Salon with Bernard E. Harcourt: In-depth conversation about Critique & Praxis: A Critical Philosophy of Illusions, Values, and Action, March 2021 (on Zoom) • Organizer of the workshop “Cipher, Myth, and Symbol in Karl Jaspers” with Maeve Cooke, March 2021 (on Zoom) • Radio Interview for the radio show “What to do with those who think differently about Covid-19? A conversation with social scientists,” produced by David von Westphalen, Bayerischer Rundfunk 2, Kulturjournal, January 10, 2021 • Participant in the Women’s Research and Writing Colloquium at the Political
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Judgment and Imagination in Habermas's Theory of Law Thomas Fossen Institute for Philosophy Leiden University the Final Ve
    Judgment and Imagination in Habermas’s Theory of Law Thomas Fossen Institute for Philosophy Leiden University The final version of this paper was published in Philosophy & Social Criticism: psc.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0191453714566485 Abstract: Recent debates in political theory display a renewed interest in the problem of judgment. This article critically examines the different senses of judgment that are at play in Jürgen Habermas’s theory of law. The paper offers (a) a new critical reading of Habermas’s account of the legitimacy of law, and (b) a revisionary interpretation of the reconstructive approach to political theory that underpins it. Both of these are instrumental to (c) an understanding of what is involved in judging the legitimacy of law that is richer than has been recognized thus far by both critics and defenders of Habermas. Keywords: Habermas, law, legitimacy, judgment, imagination, reconstruction, communicative action, deliberative democracy, agonistic politics Acknowledgments: I am grateful to Joel Anderson, Bert van den Brink, and Patchen Markell for critical discussions and inspiration, and I’ve also benefited from feedback from Wout Cornelissen, J.J. McFadden, Daniel Gaus, David Owen, Martine Prange, Herman Siemens, an anonymous referee, and an audience at the Dutch Research School for Practical Philosophy, especially discussant Stefan Rummens. Thanks also to Ciarán Ó Faoláin for his careful copy-editing. Work on this paper was funded by a grant from the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), entitled “Between Agonism and Deliberation: Rethinking Conflict and its Relation to Law in Political Philosophy.” 1 1. Introduction What is involved in judging the legitimacy of law? Much of the philosophical debate about legitimacy focuses on the content and justification of principles of legitimacy in light of which law (or political authority more broadly) ought to be considered legitimate or illegitimate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moment Has Passed Power After Arendt
    4 THE MOMENT HAS PASSED Power after Arendt Patchen Markell “America’s Tahrir Moment”: that’s the title of an Adbusters blog entry from early September 2011. Nobody Can Predict the Moment of Revolution: the title of a short documentary video about Occupy Wall Street produced by some of its participants. “Transforming Occupy Wall Street from a Moment to a Movement”: the headline of a widely circulated article urging the occupiers to organize themselves behind a series of specific progressive demands.1 It’s not hard to understand the appeal of the language of the “moment” as a way of capturing the political rhythms of the past two years, whether in Sidi Bouzid, Oakland, Cairo, London, or lower Manhattan. Against the background of a feeling of political stuckness, of being in a rut you can’t see how to break out of, or of being subject to something—whether it’s an authoritarian dynasty or an economic system—that you feel powerless to contest, political aspiration can take the form of the desire for a moment of radical transformation, of the sudden appearance of new possibilities. Against the same background, promising moments can prove disappoint- ing precisely in their momentariness as old patterns and entrenched powers reassert themselves. Yet the notion of politics as a matter of the sudden and dramatic interruption of ordinary life, whose transformative effects must somehow be made durable without sacrificing what is radical and new in them, comes with significant costs. It has helped to anchor problematic conceptions of the authority of the political theorist: problematic because they fit poorly with the antihierarchical political principles in whose name they are often articulated and problematic because they help to reproduce 113 114 Patchen Markell subtly disempowering pictures of the very things—political power and political agency—that theory often promises to secure.
    [Show full text]
  • Tu 3–5 Pm Or by Appointment HANNAH
    Patchen Markell 2-8057, [email protected] Pick Hall 412 Office hours: Tu 3–5 pm or by appointment HANNAH ARENDT’S THE HUMAN CONDITION Political Science 24500 / 34500 / Fundamentals 22212 Spring Quarter 2014 Mondays, 1:30–4:20 pm Wieboldt 408 This seminar will be devoted to a reading of Hannah Arendt’s The Human Condition (1958), one of the most influential works of political theory written in the twentieth century. Topics include: the meaning and function of Arendt’s distinctions among “public,” “private” and “social” and among “labor,” “work,” and “action”; the significance and prospects of human activity, including especially political activity, in modernity; the relation between philosophy and politics in and beyond Athens; the significance of the scientific revolution for modernity; the meanings of work, leisure, and consumption in postwar capitalism; the nature and basis of political power and freedom; the relations between art and politics; and many others. In addition to The Human Condition, we’ll read some supplementary material, which includes work by some of the thinkers with whom Arendt was more or less explicitly in conversation; work by other writers from her era that will help us to situate Arendt in the larger contexts of twentieth-century intellectual life; and more recent writing that will give us different angles on some of the issues in Arendt’s book. This is a limited-enrollment, by-consent seminar, open to advanced undergraduates and to graduate students; in the event of a scarcity of places, some priority may be given to undergraduates. TEXTS: The primary text for the course is Hannah Arendt, The Human Condition (Chicago, 1958, 2nd ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalism's Uneven Revolution: Reflections on Wendy Brown's Undoing the Demos
    Neoliberalism's Uneven Revolution: Reflections on Wendy Brown's Undoing the Demos Patchen Markell Theory & Event, Volume 20, Number 2, April 2017, pp. 520-527 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/655784 Access provided by Hunter College Libraries (30 Jul 2018 16:38 GMT) Neoliberalism’s Uneven Revolution: Reflections on Wendy Brown’s Undoing the Demos Patchen Markell endy Brown’s Undoing the Demos1 tells a big, ambitious, and unfamiliar story about what neoliberalism is, and about Wwhat its ascent means for us. Unlike a lot of lesser books and articles on the subject, its sweep does not come at the cost of being vague, hasty, or gestural. It is, to the contrary, theoretically precise, deliberately paced, and carefully rooted in rich and detailed accounts of our present and our recent past. And, most of all, it is a book that is more than the sum of its individual arguments: to read it is to be drawn into a space and a perspective that will change how you look at the world. In that, I think it is a masterpiece of political theory. The questions and comments posed here about Undoing the Dem- os are meant to be internal to its space—that is, they are meant to be questions and comments of the kind that, on my reading anyway, the book means to provoke or invite. Before posing these questions, then, I need to say something about how I understand Brown’s rhetorical stance in Undoing the Demos, which, if I’m right, may also help avoid a possible misunderstanding of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucerne Master Class 2016 with Prof
    Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences Lucerne Master Class 2016 With Prof. Dr. Axel Honneth Jack C. Weinstein Professor for the Humanities, Columbia University (New York) Professor of Social Philosophy, Goethe University (Frankfurt) Towards a Critical Theory of Markets 2–6 May 2016, University of Lucerne Course Location: Hotel Seeburg, Lucerne Contents: Welcome! 4 Organisation 5 Preparation 6 Axel Honneth & Towards a Critical Theory of Markets 7 Programme Overview 8 Detailed Programme 9 Monday 9 Tuesday 10 Wednesday 11 Thursday 12 Friday 12 Participants & Projects 13 Bader, Daniel 14 Dijkstra, Lizabeth 16 Heiland, Heiner 18 Knobbe, Sonja 20 Léger, Alexandre 22 Niazi, Nahyan 24 Overwijk, Jan 26 Peter, Lukas 28 Møller Stahl, Rune 30 Schmieden, Susanne 32 Teixeira, Pedro 34 Tunderman, Simon 36 Vogel, Tobias 38 Waitkus, Nora 40 Wienhues, Anna 42 3 Welcome! Dear Participants We are pleased to welcome you in Lucerne, Switzerland for the third Lucerne Master Class en- titled Towards a Critical Theory of Markets from 2–6 May 2016! Running annually from 2015–2019 under the general theme The Culture of Markets, the Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences (GSL) at the University of Lucerne will be offering one- week Master Classes, which will offer the opportunity to analyse the variety of virulent problems in the market through a range of scientific perspectives. We wish you all an inspiring and pleasant time at the University of Lucerne and we are looking forward to spending this week with you. Yours sincerely Prof. Dr. Martin Hartmann Professor of Philosophy, Chair for Practical Philosophy at the University of Lucerne.
    [Show full text]
  • Government 4000/6816 Cornell University Fall
    Government 4000/6816 Professor Patchen Markell Cornell University Office hours: Tuesdays, 2–4pm Fall 2021 or by appointment, White Hall 311 [email protected] SEMINAR: ARENDT Mondays, 11:20am–1:50pm, location TBA COURSE DESCRIPTION: This is a seminar on the political thought of Hannah Arendt, meant for advanced undergraduates and graduate students in Government and related fields in the humanities and humanistic social sciences. Prior familiarity with Arendt’s work is not necessary, but some prior work in political theory is required (e.g., Government 1615, for undergraduates). One source of Arendt’s enduring interest as a political theorist lies in the fact that she seemed to understand the meaning of “politics” very differently from many of her contemporaries and predecessors. But if politics is not essentially about the distinction between friends and enemies; or the possession of the legitimate means of violence in a territory; or who gets what, when, and how; or who does what to whom; or the rule of reason in the city and the soul—then what was politics, from Arendt’s perspective? Why did it matter? Was there such a thing as doing politics well or badly? What were the prospects for politics as a distinctive human practice in the post-World War II world? In this seminar we will pursue these and other questions via a slow, chapter-by-chapter reading and discussion of Arendt’s 1958 book The Human Condition, along with a number of other, shorter works of Arendt’s from from the 1940s through the 1970s. These readings will be supplemented by selections from the works of philosophers with whom Arendt was tacitly or explicitly engaged; selections from the writings of some of Arendt’s contemporaries, which will help us situate her work in the political and intellectual landscapes of the postwar world; and a few more recent readings that will give us different angles on some of the subjects Arendt addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Candace A. Vogler Department of Philosophy the University of Chicago 1115 East 58Th Street Chicago, IL 60637
    Curriculum Vitae Candace A. Vogler Department of Philosophy The University of Chicago 1115 East 58th Street Chicago, IL 60637 Academic Appointments David B. and Clara E. Stern Professor of Philosophy, University of Chicago Chair of Virtue Theory, Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues & Fellow, Royal Institute of Philosophy, May 2018-May 2021 Fulbright Distinguished Visiting Professor, University of Notre Dame Australia, August- September 2017 Chair, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 2011-2014 Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 2007-2010 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 2000-2007 Co-Director, Masters of Arts Program in the Humanities, University of Chicago, 2000-2007 Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 1994-2000 Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, 1992-1994 Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of California, Los Angeles, 1992 Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, University of California, Davis, 1991 Instructor, Department of Philosophy, Chatham College, 1989 Teaching Fellow, Department of Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, 1988-1990 Education University of Pittsburgh (1985-1992), Ph.D., Philosophy, 1994 Ph.D. certificate, Program for the Study of Culture, 1992 Mills College (1978-1981; 1984-1985), B.A. in Philosophy, Honors, 1985 Fellowships and Awards Fulbright Specialist World Learning Roster (2017-present) Distinguished Visiting Faculty, Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues, University
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition and Responsibility
    religions Article Recognition and Responsibility Hille Haker Department of Theology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA; [email protected] Abstract: While the concept of responsibility is a cornerstone of Christian ethics, recognition theory still lacks a thorough theological–ethical analysis. This essay seeks to fill the gap and develop normative ethics of recognition and responsibility. The first part provides a systematic analysis of the conceptual elements of recognition, emphasizing the need to focus on misrecognition as a heuristic tool and ethical priority. While recognition coincides with responsivity and attentiveness in the encounter of self and other, responsibility adds to this the moral accountability for acts, practices, structures, and institutions, rendering recognition and responsibility interrelated but also distinct principles of morality. This normative analysis is then correlated to the hermeneutical, narrative ethics of Christian ethics. The founding narrative of biblical ethics, the Cain and Abel narrative in Gen 4, is interpreted as a dialectic of recognition and responsibility. Both exegesis and ethics profit from this interdisciplinary and correlative approach between philosophical and biblical ethics. Finally, the ethics of recognition and responsibility, which emerges from the Frankfurt School critical theory, is confronted with exemplary indigenous approaches focusing on mutual responsibility as the foundation of ecological ethics. Christian ethics of recognition and responsibility resonates with
    [Show full text]
  • UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The sources and limits of political enthusiasm Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7x24v971 Author Poe, Andrew Publication Date 2010 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Sources and Limits of Political Enthusiasm A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Andrew Poe Committee in charge: Professor Tracy Strong, Chair Professor Fonna Forman-Barzilai Professor Harvey Goldman Professor Patchen Markell Professor Philip Roeder 2010 Copyright Andrew Poe, 2010 All rights reserved The dissertation of Andrew Poe is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2010 iii DEDICATION For Alivia, especially for beginning everything by mistakenly saying “I know you!” iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page....................................................................................................................iii Dedication...........................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago Political Freedom Between
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO POLITICAL FREEDOM BETWEEN ARENDT AND FOUCAULT A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY JOHN U. NEF COMMITTEE ON SOCIAL THOUGHT BY DAWN HERRERA HELPHAND CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JUNE 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments iii Abstract v Chapter One: Liberal Conceptions of Political Freedom: Property, Sovereignty, State 1 Chapter Two: Freedom Between Arendt and Foucault: Problematics and Possibilities 48 Chapter Three: Freedom as Practice 118 Chapter Four: The Free Subject in Play 153 Chapter Five: State, Race, Violence 202 Chapter Six: Freedom as Event 248 ii I owe an immense debt of gratitude to the teachers, mentors and friends who have guided me in the completion of this project. I would like to thank my Chair, Nathan Tarcov, for his trust in my capacity, his steadying hand when I myself doubted it, and for the care he has taken with my work; Patchen Markell, whose subtle insight and breadth of knowledge, have been matched only by his profound generosity; and Bernard Harcourt, who from the beginning has directed me straight to the heart of the matter and encouraged me to embrace my vision as my own. Thank you all for challenging and supporting me. I am truly fortunate to have had the opportunity to work with you: your friendship and advice are an inestimable gift. Thank you to the Committee on Social Thought, for providing my colleagues and I with that rarest, most precious scholarly resource: space to think. For helping me find my footing there I am deeply indebted to the late Paul Friedrich, a great soul and a dear friend.
    [Show full text]
  • Goldman CV January 2019
    Loren Goldman Department of Political Science University of Pennsylvania The Ronald O. Perelman Center for Political Science and Economics 133 S. 36th St. Philadelphia, PA 19104-6215 Academic Employment Since 2016. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Assistant Professor of Political Science (tenure track). 2013-2016. Ohio University, Athens, OH. Visiting Assistant Professor of Political Science. 2011-2013. University of California, Berkeley. Mellon Postdoctoral Fellow in the Humanities, Department of Rhetoric. 2010-2011. Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Cultural Analysis. Education 2003-2010. University of Chicago. Ph. D. (2010), M.A. (2005), Political Science. Dissertation: “The Sources of Political Hope: Will, World and Democracy.” Committee: Patchen Markell (Chair), Robert Gooding-Williams, John P. McCormick, Robert Pippin. Comprehensive Exams: Political Theory, Comparative Politics (distinction). 2001-2003. University of Oxford. M.Phil., Politics. Thesis: "Organic Analogies and The New Liberalism." Supervisor: Michael Freeden Exams: Contemporary Political Theory, Political Philosophy from Machiavelli to Burke, Political Theories of Hegel and Marx, Political Institutions. 2000-2001. Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität-Frankfurt, Germany. DAAD Jahresstipendiat, Philosophie, 2000-2001. With Prof. Axel Honneth. 1996-2000. Yale University. B.A., Political Science. Cum laude, with honors in the major. Senior Thesis: “Tending to the Extremes: Aesthetic Epistemology, Mass Culture and the Dialectics of Emancipation in the Work of Theodor W. Adorno.” Research and Teaching Interests Political Theory, History of Political Thought, American Pragmatism, Critical Theory, Democratic Theory, German Idealism, Utopian Thought. Loren Goldman, Curriculum Vitae 2 Publications [Refereed Articles in Journals] -- “Richard Rorty’s ‘Post-Kantian’ Philosophy of History.” Journal of The Philosophy of History 9:3, 2015, 410-443.
    [Show full text]
  • Arendtian Contributions to Liberal Political Theory
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2006 Arendtian contributions to liberal political theory Sarah M. McGrath The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation McGrath, Sarah M., "Arendtian contributions to liberal political theory" (2006). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5251. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5251 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD) LIBRARY The University o f Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and reports. **Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature** Yes, I grant permission >< No, I do not grant permission ______ ~ S. Author's Signature;. — ^ ^ ) Date: ^ ~ ^ - Q£>____________ Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. 8/98 ARENDTIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO LIBERAL POLITICAL THEORY by Sarah M. McGrath B.S. Grand Valley State University, 2002 B.A. Grand Valley State University, 2003 presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts University of Montana July 2006 Approved by: Chairperson Dean, Graduate School 2 S -o £ Date UMI Number: EP40715 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]