DOCSLIB.ORG

Developing Ambient Methods for Ambient Rhetorics by Mark Evan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Developing Ambient Methods for Ambient Rhetorics by Mark Evan Developing Ambient Methods for Ambient Rhetorics by Mark Evan Davis, B.A., M.A. A Dissertation In Technical Communication and Rhetoric Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved Dr. Greg Wilson Committee Chair Dr. Rich Rice Dr. Beau Pihlaja Dr. Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School May, 2019 Copyright 2019 Mark Evan Davis Texas Tech University, Mark Evan Davis, May 2019 Acknowledgements Thank you to my committee chair, Dr. Greg Wilson, for all his knowledge, guidance, support, and wit throughout this academic journey. His unwavering patience and encouragement were anchors that steadied this project, as well as his rich insights and expertise which helped this project come to light. I am forever grateful to him for making all this possible. I would also like to thank Dr. Rich Rice for all his persistence, support, and help. From very early on he was there, sticking with me through various twists and turns before this project was even born. I am very grateful to him. I am also thankful to Dr. Beau Pihlaja for his willingness and commitment to join my committee. Additionally, I am grateful to Dr. Roxanne Aftanas and Dr. Kelli Prejean who were very early forerunners in my academic journey. Roxanne first introduced me to rhetoric as a field of study, and so I will always be appreciative of her influence, skillset, and overall support of me. To my parents, Jeff and Neena, I am truly thankful. Anything I have achieved or will achieve stands on their shoulders—it is a tribute to their loving support and exemplary qualities. To my beloved wife, Mariel, you have always stood by my side and have taught me things that far exceed my work here. I am indebted to your love and friendship forever. יְהֹוָה אֶהְ יֶה אֲשֶר אֶהְ יֶה And lastly, thanks to ַמ ִּ֤גיד ֵֵֽמֵר אש ית֙ ַאֲח ִ֔רית ּו מֶֶּ֖קֶדם ֲא ֶֶׁ֣שר לֹא־ַנֲעׂ֑שּו אֹמֵר֙ ֲעָצ ֶׁ֣תי ָתִ֔קּום ְוָכלֶ־חְפ ֶּ֖צי ֶאֱע ֵֶֽשה׃ יְר ֶַׁ֣את יְהֹוָה ֵר ֶׁ֣אשית ָׂ֑דַעת ָחְכ ָָ֥מה ּוּ֝ מּוסָָ֗ ר ֱא וי ָ֥לים ֵָֽבזּו׃ ii Texas Tech University, Mark Evan Davis, May 2019 Table of Contents Acknowledgements֙……………………………………………………………………….ii Abstract …………………………………………………………………………..……..viii List֙of֙Tables֙………………………………………………………………………….…ix List֙of֙Figures֙……………………………………………………………………….……x Chapter 1: Introduction (A Foundation for Ambience) ………...………..…….....…..1 Defining֙Ambience֙…………………………………………………..…….……..3 Voices Contributing to֙Ambience֙............………………………………..3 Rickert֙and֙Ambience֙……………………………………………………5 Wrapping Up and Moving Forward ………………………….…………..7 The Non-human turn in Rhetoric and Technical Communication֙……………….7 Rethinking Chōra and Kairos Within Ambience֙…………………….…………10 Chōra ……………………………………………………………………………11 Chōra and its Role in Scholarship ………………………...………….…11 Theoretical Approaches to Chōra ……………………………....……….12 Why is Chōra Ambient? ………………………………………...………14 Kairos ……………………………………………………………………………15 Kairos and its Role in Scholarship ………………………………………15 Theoretical Approaches to Kairos ………………………………..……..16 Why is Kairos Ambient? ………………………………………..…….…17 Tying Together and Moving Forward …………………………….……..17 New Materialism and Speculative Realism: Core Theories֙for֙Ambience֙……..18 New֙Materialism֙………...………………………………………………………19 What is New Materialism?֙……………………………………..………..19 New Materialist Scholarship: Core Concepts for֙Ambience֙...………….21 Embodiment ……………………………………………………..21 Diffractions ……………………………………………..……….22 Metamorphosis and֙Becoming֙………………………………….23 Why New Materialism is a Form of Ambience …………………..……..25 Speculative֙Realism֙…….……………………………………………………….28 iii Texas Tech University, Mark Evan Davis, May 2019 What is Speculative Realism? ……………………………………...……28 Speculative Realist Scholarship: Core Concepts for֙Ambience֙……..….29 Rift Between Object-to-Object Relations֙……………………….29 Rift Between an Object and֙its֙Qualities֙……………….……….30 Objects Withdraw֙……………………………………………….31 Causality is Aesthetic …………………………....………………32 The Necessity for Ambient Methods֙...………………………………………….34 Overview of Chapters ……………………………………………...……………36 Chapter 2: Literature Review: Ecology, System, and Network: An Invitation to Move Beyond …….……………………………………………………………………..38 Ecology …….……………………………………………………………………39 Ecology in Technical Communication and Rhetoric֙……………………39 Ecology’s֙Ontological֙Grounding֙…………………………...………….43 Why Ambience is More Than Ecology ………………………...……….46 System …...………………………………………………………………………48 System in Technical Communication and Rhetoric֙……………………..48 System’s֙Ontological֙Grounding֙……………………………….……….50 Why Ambience is More Than System ………………………….……….52 Network ...……………………………………………………………………….54 Network in Technical Communication and Rhetoric֙..…….….…...……54 Network’s֙Ontological֙Grounding֙……………………………...………56 Why Ambience is More Than Network֙…………………………………60 Conclusions: Moving Beyond Ecology, System, and Network: Towards Ambience ………………………………………….…………………………….62 Chapter 3: Thinking With and Beyond Bruno Latour to Trend Towards Ambience ………..……………………………………………………………………..֙64 Artifact of Study ………………………………………………………..……….64 But֙What֙Constitutes֙a֙“Moment”֙or֙“Occasion”֙for֙a֙Field?֙……...….67 How is TWBL arranged? ………………………………………...………68 How Will TWBL be Analyzed? ………………………………..………..69 Crafting Assemblages …………………………………………………..……….71 Chapter Overviews and Themes ……………………………………..….72 iv Texas Tech University, Mark Evan Davis, May 2019 What Latourian Concept Do These Themes Exemplify? Event ……..….74 Event …………………………………………………...………..74 Composing Assemblages …………………………………………..……………76 Chapter Overviews and Themes …………………………………..…….77 What Latourian Concept Do These Themes Exemplify? Impact …….…79 Impact ……………………………………………………..….…80 Convening Assemblages ……………………………………………….………..82 Chapter Overviews and Themes ………………………………..……….83 What Latourian Concept Do These Themes Exemplify? Aggregate ……86 Aggregate ………………………………………………………..86 Part-to-Whole ……………………………….……….…..86 Black box ………………………………………………..88 Conceiving Assemblages …………………………………………..……………89 Chapter Overviews and Themes ………………………………….……..90 What Latourian Concept Do These Themes Exemplify? Hybrids …..…֙94 Hybrids …………………………………………………….…….94 Natural/Artificial ………………………………………...95 Conclusion: What Does TWBL Reveal֙About֙the֙Field’s֙Ontology?֙..…………97 Reversing֙Latour’s֙Ontological֙Concepts:֙Trending֙Towards֙Ambience ….…..97 Chapter 4: Ambient Methods for Ambient Rhetorics ………………………..….…100 The Structure and Aim of the Chapter ………………………………..………..101 Situating Each Link in the Conceptual Mapping ……………………...……….105 Ambient Concept ………………………………………………...…….105 Ambient Method …………………………………………...…………..106 Rhetorical Figure ……………………………………..………………..108 Canon֙of֙“Ambient”֙Rhetoric֙……………………………...………….109 All Four Links Taken Together in the Conceptual Mapping …….…………….110 First Set of Ambient Conceptual Mappings ……………………………..……..110 Ambient Concept: Background ……………………….………….…….111 Ambient Method: Counterfactual …………………………..………….113 v Texas Tech University, Mark Evan Davis, May 2019 Practical Application: ………………………………….……….114 Rhetorical Device: Contrarium ……………………………..……….…116 Canon of Ambient Rhetoric: Delivery ………………………..…….….117 Second Set of Ambient Conceptual Mappings ………………………..……….118 Ambient Concept: Chōra ……………………………………...……….119 Ambient Method: Hyperbole ………………………………..…………120 Practical Application: …………………………………..………121 Rhetorical Figure: Auxesis ……………………………………………..123 Canon of Ambient Rhetoric: Memory ………………………………....124 Third Set of Ambient Conceptual Mappings ……………………………..……125 Ambient Concept: Style ……………………………………..…………125 Ambient Method: Simulation ………………………………………….127 Practical Application: ……………………….………………….129 Creating a Projection ……………………….…….…….131 Constructing a Context …………………………...........131 Composing a Parody ………………………………..….132 Rhetorical Figure: Similitudo ……………………………………..…....134 Canon of Ambient Rhetoric: Style ……………………………….…….134 Fourth Set of Ambient Conceptual Mappings …………………………..……..135 Ambient Concept: Kairos ……………………………………….……..136 Ambient Method: Accidental …………………………………….….…138 Practical Application ……………………………………...……139 Rhetorical Figure: Significatio …………………………………………142 Canon of Ambient Rhetoric: Arrangement …………………………….142 Conclusion: Four Ambient Methods …………………………………….……..144 Why Has the First Canon (Inventio) Been Excluded? …………………145 Moving Forward: Implications and Larger Applications ………...……145 Chapter 5: Putting the Humanities Back in the Posthumanities (but with a twist): Implications, Recommendations and Common Intersections …………………..…147 Introduction ……………………………………………………...……………..147 vi Texas Tech University, Mark Evan Davis, May 2019 Structure and Aim of the Chapter ………………………………………...……148 Part One: Implications and Recommendations …………………………….…..149 Persuasion as Both Non-human and Ambient …………………………149 First Recommendation: The Field Should Reinterpret Anthropocentrism Without Restricting Rhetoric …………………………………………..154 Second Recommendation: The Field Should Transition From Anti-Realist to Speculative Realist֙…………………………………………………..156 Third Recommendation: The Field Should Grant Finitude to All Things, Not Just the Human Mind ……………………………………….….….158 Part Two: Common Intersections ……………………………………..……….161 Ken֙Baake’s֙Metaphor֙Harmonics֙…………………………………….161 Victor֙Vitanza’s֙Third֙Sophistic֙…………………………...……….…165 From Negation to Excess …………………………...…….……166 From Polis to Pagus ………………………………….………..168 Conclusions and Final Appeal ………………………………….……………...170 References ……………………………………………………………………….…….173 Appendix: Table of Contents
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 11 October 2019 Page 1 of 15 SATURDAY 05 OCTOBER 2019 Fans Helps Explain the Current State of Politics
    Radio 4 Listings for 5 – 11 October 2019 Page 1 of 15 SATURDAY 05 OCTOBER 2019 fans helps explain the current state of politics. Editor: Eleanor Garland SAT 00:00 Midnight News (m0008y9h) Penny is an academic and a serial fan - covering everything National and international news from BBC Radio 4 from David Bowie to Ed Balls. And in this energetic and witty SAT 10:30 The Kitchen Cabinet (m00092tc) talk Penny argues that many of the characteristics of fandom Series 26 elsewhere - a rich interest, a wish to protect the sanctity of the SAT 00:30 Margaret Thatcher: Herself Alone (m0008y7r) fandom, and a refusal to tolerate criticism - also mark politics Isle of Wight Episode 5 and political fans, whatever side they're on. And that understanding politics in this way may help us understand it Jay Rayner and his panel are on the Isle of Wight. Polly Russell, How did Margaret Thatcher both change and divide Britain? better. Tim Hayward, Paula McIntyre and Tim Anderson answer the How did her model of combative female leadership help shape culinary questions from the audience. the way we live now? How did the woman who won the Cold Producer: Giles Edwards War and three general elections in succession find herself This week the panellists offer ideas for blackberries, suggest a pushed out by her own MPs? foolproof way to flip an omelette and discuss cheese soufflé. SAT 06:00 News and Papers (m00092t1) Charles Moore’s full account, based on unique access to The latest news headlines. Including the weather and a look at David Redup of Grace's bakery joins the panel with Bird's Margaret Thatcher herself, her papers, and her closest the papers.
    [Show full text]
  • Has TV Eaten Itself? RTS STUDENT TELEVISION AWARDS 2014 5 JUNE 1:00Pm BFI Southbank, London SE1 8XT
    May 2015 Has TV eaten itself? RTS STUDENT TELEVISION AWARDS 2014 5 JUNE 1:00pm BFI Southbank, London SE1 8XT Hosted by Romesh Ranganathan. Nominated films and highlights of the awards ceremony will be broadcast by Sky www.rts.org.uk Journal of The Royal Television Society May 2015 l Volume 52/5 From the CEO The general election are 16-18 September. I am very proud I’d like to thank everyone who has dominated the to say that we have assembled a made the recent, sold-out RTS Futures national news agenda world-class line-up of speakers. evening, “I made it in… digital”, such a for much of the year. They include: Michael Lombardo, success. A full report starts on page 23. This month, the RTS President of Programming at HBO; Are you a fan of Episodes, Googlebox hosts a debate in Sharon White, CEO of Ofcom; David or W1A? Well, who isn’t? This month’s which two of televi- Abraham, CEO at Channel 4; Viacom cover story by Stefan Stern takes a sion’s most experienced anchor men President and CEO Philippe Dauman; perceptive look at how television give an insider’s view of what really Josh Sapan, President and CEO of can’t stop making TV about TV. It’s happened in the political arena. AMC Networks; and David Zaslav, a must-read. Jeremy Paxman and Alastair Stew- President and CEO of Discovery So, too, is Richard Sambrook’s TV art are in conversation with Steve Communications. Diary, which provides some incisive Hewlett at a not-to-be missed Leg- Next month sees the 20th RTS and timely analysis of the election ends’ Lunch on 19 May.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald Trump V Piers Morgan Proves the Political Interview Is a Dying Art
    Donald Trump v Piers Morgan proves the political interview is a dying art It's become about entertainment and not holding power to account Piers Morgan's much-trailed interview with Donald Trump (Image: ITV) Want to keep up to date on Welsh politics? When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters. Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer. OurPrivacy Noticeexplains more about how we use your data, and your rights. You can unsubscribe at any time. Thank you for subscribingWe have more newslettersShow meSee ourprivacy notice Invalid Email Piers Morgan’s much-trumpeted (and subsequently much-criticised) recent interview with Donald Trump was remarkable for a number of reasons. In the first place, it represented the first time that the President had been interviewed on British television and for that reason alone the meeting was greatly anticipated. That said, given the closeness of the relationship between Trump and Morgan, it’s true to say that no-one was seriously expecting the interview be anything other than the festival of flattery that it turned out to be. Trump was, as usual, triumphalist, vague, self-congratulatory and repetitive. He is clearly not a man enamoured with the finer details of policy, diplomacy, strategy or finesse. Morgan’s chummy approach played to his friend’s obvious skills. When the topics did veer into territory which should have been explored in greater depth, such as climate change, Morgan failed to challenge any of Trump’s more sim- plistic and dangerous assertions.
    [Show full text]
  • Indirect Defensive Responses to Hostile Questions in British Broadcastnews Interviews
    Dangjie Ji-Indirect Defensive Responsesto Hostile Questions In British BroadcastNews Interviews INDIRECT DEFENSIVE RESPONSES TO HOSTILE QUESTIONS IN BRITISH BROADCAST NEWS INTERVIEWS (2 Volumes) (Vol. 2) Dangjie Ji PhD University of York Centre of Communication Studies December2008 TJIo ML 2ý Dangjie Ji-Indirect Defensive Responsesto Hostile Questions In British BroadcastNews Interviews TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 2 Cover (Vol. 2) 312 Table of Contents (Vol. 2) 313 Appendices Appendix A: Transcript Symbols in this thesis 314 Appendix B: Data Transcriptions for this thesis 320 Notes 568 Bibliography 570 313 Dangjie Ji-Indirect Defensive Responsesto Hostile Questions In British BroadcastNews Interviews APPENDICES Appendix A: Transcription rules in this thesis 1. Transcript Symbols: [ Separateleft squarebrackets, one above the other on two [ successivelines with utterancesby different speakers,indicates a point of overlap onset, whether at the start of an utterance or later. ] Separateright squarebrackets, one above the other on two ] successivelines with utterancesby different speakers indicates a point at which two overlapping utterances both end, where one ends while the other continues, or simultaneous moments in overlapswhich continue. { Thesesymbol are used to mark overlapping when more than two } persons are talking at the same time. Similar to the symbols of [ ], { marks the beginning of the overlapping, and } marks the end of overlapping. = Equal signs indicate `latching', i. e. without break or silence between utterancesbefore and after the sign. They are used in two circumstances: a) When indicating `latching' of utterancesbetween two different speakers,they come in pairs-one at the end of a line and another at the start of the next line or one shortly thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • James Harding (PDF)
    Society of Editors speech – 11 November 2014 What we’re up to – and what we’re up for. Good morning, there was an item on PM a few weeks ago in which Eddie Mair asked the audience what the collective noun for spies should be. My favourite suggestion was a mince – a mince of spies. And, as I was coming here, I was wondering what the collective noun for editors might be. A bar of editors? A quarrel of editors? Then I remembered what I would have said as a reporter – and, no doubt, our newsrooms would generally agree - a surfeit of editors. Anyway, this is a roundabout way of saying that, whether you’ve got me here as a former member of the best club in the country or as a fellow traveller who’s now down on his luck and ended up in the broadcasting business, it is great to be amongst the Society of Editors and I’m extremely grateful to Bob for inviting me. Thank you. Before I get going, I know people are interested in what’s happening on the Panorama on Mazher Mahmood: This is a seriously good piece of work, extremely revealing and squarely in the public interest. But the worst of all worlds is when you get the big picture right, and trip up over a detail. So when some information we'd been asking to see for many days was sent to us by Mazher Mahmood's lawyers at seven o'clock last night, we, as a responsible broadcaster, had to consider it.
    [Show full text]
  • Willamette Writers Conference Re’S So Utu Bri E F Gh H T T
    The 41st Annual Willamette Writers Conference re’s So utu Bri e F gh h t T . August 6 - 8, 2010 Pre-conference Activities 5 - 9 p.m. Thursday, August 5 Sheraton Airport Hotel - Portland, Oregon CONSULTS MEALS Your registration includes breakfast, lunch, coffee service, and after- Taking FILM One-on-One Taking LITERARY One-on-One noon snacks. Please tell us if you will be joining us for these meals Pitches and Group Sessions Pitches and Group Sessions so we can order the right amount of food. Vegetarian and gluten- free options are available, but you must tell us when you register. F-1 Karen Black L-1 Marilyn Allen F-2 Steve Crawford DAILY MENUS L-2 Adrienne Avila BREAKFAST F-3 Mike Esola L-3 Jenny Bent We have a full breakfast every morning from 7:30 to 8:45. F-4 Chris Emerson L-4 Martin R. Biro It is served buffet style in the Mt. Hood Foyer. Tables are F-5 Elishia Holmes L-5 Andrea Brown available in the Mt. Hood Ballroom. The buffet may stay F-6 Josh Kesselman L-6 Kerri Buckley out longer, but the ballroom closes for seating at 8:45 in F-7 Oliver Kramer L-7 Ginger Clark order to prepare for consults. F-8 Danny Manus L-8 April Eberhardt Daily announcements are made at 8:20 in the ballroom. F-9 Marc Manus L-9 Paul Fedorko The breakfast menu is a variation on the following: F-10 Amee McNaughton L-10 Melissa Flashman eggs, fruit, yogurt, cereal, breakfast breads (sweet rolls, F-11 Matthew Milam L-11 Stephen Fraser bagels, muffins, etc.), juice and coffee service.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex to the BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17
    Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17 Annex to the BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17 Annex to the BBC Annual Report and Accounts 2016/17 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport by command of Her Majesty © BBC Copyright 2017 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as BBC copyright and the document title specified. Photographs are used ©BBC or used under the terms of the PACT agreement except where otherwise identified. Permission from copyright holders must be sought before any photographs are reproduced. You can download this publication from bbc.co.uk/annualreport BBC Pay Disclosures July 2017 Report from the BBC Remuneration Committee of people paid more than £150,000 of licence fee revenue in the financial year 2016/17 1 Senior Executives Since 2009, we have disclosed salaries, expenses, gifts and hospitality for all senior managers in the BBC, who have a full time equivalent salary of £150,000 or more or who sit on a major divisional board. Under the terms of our new Charter, we are now required to publish an annual report for each financial year from the Remuneration Committee with the names of all senior executives of the BBC paid more than £150,000 from licence fee revenue in a financial year. These are set out in this document in bands of £50,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy People Dr Ann Limb CBE DL
    Policy People Dr Ann Limb CBE DL in conversation with the Serco Institute March 2021 “I really think it is important for leaders to be open about their identities.” Policy People is a series of interviews with key figures across the international public service landscape, produced by the Serco Institute, a global think tank. In this volume, Ann Limb reflects on a remarkable forty-year career spanning multiple sectors. A former college principal, senior civil servant, political adviser and Local Enterprise Partnership leader, Dr Limb has since 2015 served as the first female chair of The Scout Association – one of several non-executive roles she continues to hold three decades after being appointed to her first public service leadership post. Named in 2019 as the most influential LGBTQ+ role model in the public sector, Dr Limb speaks openly about the challenges of leadership in the modern world, and the place of values and inclusion in modern public life. In wide-ranging interviews, she considers the future of the education sector, the nature of social mobility, and the challenges facing twenty-first century, post-Covid Britain. This Policy People volume promises to hold great interest for students and researchers, public and civil servants, politicians, educators, and all those with an interest in public services today. The interviewee’s answers reflect their thoughts alone, at the time of writing. The interview was conducted in Summer 2020. Policy People 2 Dr Ann Limb CBE DL Dr Ann Limb CBE DL was born and raised in Manchester, before studying French at the University of Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • Personalised Responses and Equivocation in Political Interviews Waddle, M and Bull, P
    “You’re important, Jeremy, but not that important” : personalised responses and equivocation in political interviews Waddle, M and Bull, P http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1095 Title “You’re important, Jeremy, but not that important” : personalised responses and equivocation in political interviews Authors Waddle, M and Bull, P Type Article URL This version is available at: http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/58712/ Published Date 2020 USIR is a digital collection of the research output of the University of Salford. Where copyright permits, full text material held in the repository is made freely available online and can be read, downloaded and copied for non-commercial private study or research purposes. Please check the manuscript for any further copyright restrictions. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. Journal of Social and Political Psychology jspp.psychopen.eu | 2195-3325 Original Research Reports “You’re Important, Jeremy, but Not That Important”: Personalised Responses and Equivocation in Political Interviews Maurice Waddle* a, Peter Bull ab [a] Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom. [b] Department of Psychology, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom. Abstract This study was an assessment of personalised equivocation in political interviews, namely, politicians’ responses to questions which, in lieu of an explicit reply, are directed personally at the interviewer. Twenty-six interviews with recent UK party leaders were analysed in terms of questions, replies, and personalisation. The majority of personalised responses contained elements of criticism, although over a quarter were more amicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Personalised Responses and Equivocation in Political Interviews
    Journal of Social and Political Psychology jspp.psychopen.eu | 2195-3325 Original Research Reports “You’re Important, Jeremy, but Not That Important”: Personalised Responses and Equivocation in Political Interviews Maurice Waddle* a, Peter Bull ab [a] Department of Psychology, University of York, York, United Kingdom. [b] Department of Psychology, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom. Abstract This study was an assessment of personalised equivocation in political interviews, namely, politicians’ responses to questions which, in lieu of an explicit reply, are directed personally at the interviewer. Twenty-six interviews with recent UK party leaders were analysed in terms of questions, replies, and personalisation. The majority of personalised responses contained elements of criticism, although over a quarter were more amicable. For the eight featured politicians, the use of such responses was adjudged to be more about individual communicative style than their position on the political spectrum. Only one politician did not respond in this manner, indicating a more widespread use of personalisation than was previously suggested. Furthermore, an evaluation of interviewer follow-ups showed its effectiveness as a diversionary tactic in the face of troublesome questions. In terms of the proportion of questions which receive a full reply, a general reply rate analysis highlighted how recent political leaders have changed little from their predecessors. Keywords: personalization, political discourse, evasion, reply rate, personal attacks, flattery, banter Non-Technical Summary Background Commentators and researchers have highlighted an occasional tendency for some politicians, when faced with a challenging question, to direct their response personally at the interviewer. Such behaviour is often referred to, metaphorically, as “playing the man, not the ball”.
    [Show full text]
  • Get Curious Booklet
    Year 12 Get Curious about... 1 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Art 4 Biology 5 Business Studies (A level and Btec) 6 Chemistry 7 Classical Civilisation 8 Computer Science 9 Drama 10 Economics 11 English Literature 12 English Language and Literature 13 Geography 14 HIstory 15 Mathematics and Further Mathematics 16 Music 17 Photography 18 Physical Education (A level and Btec) 19 Product Design 20 Physics 21 Politics 22 Psychology 23 Philosophy, Religion and Ethics (PRE) 24 Sociology 25 Spanish 26 2 Introduction Much of what I stumbled into, by following my curiosity and intuition, turned out to be priceless later on. Steve Jobs This summer you have some time to work around your subjects, and to prepare for academic study beyond sixth form. We have produced this booklet to supplement the information provided to you via the induction booklet and resources on the Google Classroom/Google Drive. It also supports the Queens’ School Super-Curriculum, which you can find here. Every department has put together a small collection of resources that they would like you to try to read, listen to and watch before starting their course. You won’t be tested on these resources (they aren’t requirements for your course), but by getting curious about them you’ll start to understand where the sixth form might take you in the future, and how interesting your subjects are. Where more than one resource is listed, pick one first and then come back to the others if you have the time to. In September, your teachers will discuss these resources with you and will be looking to hear your thoughts and find out what you got curious about.
    [Show full text]
  • The Educational Backgrounds of Leading Journalists
    The Educational Backgrounds of Leading Journalists June 2006 NOT FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE 00.01 HOURS THURSDAY JUNE 15TH 2006 1 Foreword by Sir Peter Lampl In a number of recent studies the Sutton Trust has highlighted the predominance of those from private schools in the country’s leading and high profile professions1. In law, we found that almost 70% of barristers in the top chambers had attended fee-paying schools, and, more worryingly, that the young partners in so called ‘magic circle’ law firms were now more likely than their equivalents of 20 years ago to have been independently-educated. In politics, we showed that one third of MPs had attended independent schools, and this rose to 42% among those holding most power in the main political parties. Now, with this study, we have found that leading news and current affairs journalists – those figures who are so central in shaping public opinion and national debate – are more likely than not to have been to independent schools which educate just 7% of the population. Of the top 100 journalists in 2006, 54% were independently educated an increase from 49% in 1986. Not only does this say something about the state of our education system, but it also raises questions about the nature of the media’s relationship with society: is it healthy that those who are most influential in determining and interpreting the news agenda have educational backgrounds that are so different to the vast majority of the population? What is clear is that an independent school education offers a tremendous boost to the life chances of young people, making it more likely that they will attain highly in school exams, attend the country’s leading universities and gain access to the highest and most prestigious professions.
    [Show full text]