Nuclear Physics News

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nuclear Physics News Nuclear Physics Nuclear Physics News is published on behalf of the Nuclear Physics European Collaboration Commit- tee (NuPECC), an Expert Committee of the Euro- pean Science Foundation, with colleagues from News Europe, America, and Asia. Volume 14/No. 4 Editor: Gabriele-Elisabeth Körner Editorial Board J. D’Auria, Vancouver W. Kutschera, Vienna R. F. Casten, Yale M. Leino, Jyväskylä T. W. Donnelly, MIT Cambridge R. Lovas, Debrecen A. Eir’o, Lisbon S. Nagamiya, Tsukuba M. Huyse, Leuven (Chairman) G. van der Steenhoven, Amsterdam Editorial Office: Physikdepartment, E12, Technische Universitat München, 85748 Garching, Germany, Tel: +49 89 2891 2293, +49 172 89 15011, Fax: +49 89 2891 2298, E-mail: [email protected] Correspondents Argentina: O. Civitaresse, La Plata; Australia: A. W. Thomas, Adelaide; Austria: H. Oberhummer, Vienna; Belgium: C. Angulo, Louvain-la-Neuve; Brasil: M. Hussein, Sao Paulo; Bulgaria: D. Balabanski, Sofia; Canada: J.-M. Poutissou, TRIUMF; K. Sharma, Manitoba; C. Svensson, Guelph; China: W. Zhan, Lanzhou; Croatia: R. Caplar, Zagreb; Czech Republic: J. Kvasil, Prague; Slovak Republic: P. Povinec, Bratislave; Denmark: K. Riisager, Århus; Finland: M. Leino, Jyväskylä; France: G. De France, GANIL Caen; B. Blank, Bordeaux; M. Guidal, IPN Orsay; Germany: K. D. Gross, GSI Darmstadt; K. Kilian, Jülich; K. Lieb, Göttingen; Greece: E. Mavromatis, Athens; Hungary: B. M. Nyako, Debrecen; India: D. K. Avasthi, New Delhi; Israel: N. Auerbach, Tel Aviv; Italy: E. Vercellin, Torino; M. Ripani, Genova; L. Corradi, Legnaro; D. Vinciguerra, Catania; Japan: T. Motobayashi, Riken; H. Toki, Osaka; Malta: G. Buttigieg, Kalkara; Mexico: J. Hirsch, Mexico DF; Netherlands: G. Onderwater, KVI Groningen; T. Peitzmann, Utrecht; Norway: J. Vaagen, Bergen; Poland: T. Czosnyka, Warsaw; Portugal: M. Fernanda Silva, Sacavén; Romania: A. Raduta, Bucharest; Russia: Yu. Novikov, St. Petersburg; Spain: B. Rubio, Valencia; Sweden: P.-E. Tegner, Stockholm; Switzerland: C. Petitjean, PSI Villigen; United Kingdom: B. F. Fulton, York; D. Branford, Edinburgh; USA: R. Janssens, Argonne; Ch. E. Reece, Jefferson Lab; B. Jacak, Stony Brook; B. Sherrill, Michigan State Univ.; H. G. Ritter, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory; S. E. Vigdor, Indiana Univ.; G. Miller, Seattle. Nuclear Physics News ISSN 1050-6896 Subscriptions Nuclear Physics News is supplied free of charge to Advertising Manager nuclear physicists from contributing countries upon Maureen M. Williams, P.O. Box 1547 request. In addition, the following subscriptions are Surprise, AZ 85378-1547, USA available: Tel: +1 623 544 1698 Fax: +1 623 544 1699 Volume 14(2004), 4 issues E-mail: [email protected] Personal: $57 USD, £35 GBP Institution: $461 USD, £279 GBP Circulation and Subscriptions Taylor & Francis Inc. 325 Chestnut Street 8th Floor Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA Tel: +1 215 625 8900 Fax: +1 215 625 8914 Copyright © 2004 Taylor & Francis Inc. Reproduction without permission is prohibited. All rights reserved. The opinions expressed in NPN are not necessarily those of the editors or publishers. Vol. 14, No. 4, 2004, Nuclear Physics News 1 Nuclear Physics Volume 14/No. 4 News Contents Editorial .............................................................................................................................................................. 3 Feature Article On the Discovery of Superheavy Elements by Sigurd Hofmann, Gottfried Münzenberg, and Matthias Schädel ............................................................... 4 Superheavy Element Chemistry by Andreas Türler and A. B. Yakushev.......................................................................................................... 14 Developments in Spectroscopic Studies of Deformed Superheavy Nuclei by P. A. Butler and M. Leino ......................................................................................................................... 23 Facilities and Methods Application of Low Energy Spin Polarized Radioactive Ion Beams in Condensed Matter Research by R. F. Kiefl, K. H. Chow, W. A. MacFarlane, C. D. P. Levy, and Z. Salman ............................................. 28 KEK-JAERI Joint RNB Facility, TRIAC by H. Miyatake and H. Ikezoe....................................................................................................................... 35 Meeting Reports International Workshop on Fundamental Interactions by Gerco Onderwater ................................................................................................................................... 39 News and Views................................................................................................................................................ 40 News from EPS/NPB IBA-Europhysics Prize 2004 for “Applied Nuclear Science and Nuclear Methods in Medicine” by Ch. Leclercq-Willain ................................................................................................................................ 41 Lise Meitner Prize for Nuclear Science 2004 by Ron C. Johnson ........................................................................................................................................ 41 Calendar ................................................................................................................................... Inside back cover Cover illustration: Upper end of the chart of nuclei showing the presently known nuclei in colors attributed to their decay mode: α decay yellow, β+ decay red, β− decay blue, spontaneous fission green, and γ decaying isomers white. Also given are the measured half-lives and α-decay chains observed in experiments. The background structure in blue color shows the calculated shell correction energy according to the macroscopic-microscopic model with minimum values of –7 MeV (darkest blue) for both deformed nuclei at Z = 108, N = 162 and spherical superheavy nuclei at Z = 114, N = 184. The intensity of the blue color is reduced with increasing shell correction energy in steps of 1 MeV. 2 Nuclear Physics News, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2004 editorial To Publish or Not to Publish in Proceedings? That is indeed the question that is thus easy to get all the numbers. journals belonging to a certain science on my mind when returning from a Companies, for example, ISI web of domain as defined by ISI. For example, workshop or a conference. This might knowledge, not only deliver these Nuclear Physics B is in the nuclear seem strange at first sight, but the results but also define the parameters physics category while Nuclear question is triggered by the fact that (impact factors, number of citations Instruments and Methods A is not. more and more conference proceedings versus world averages, etc.) and Secondly, there is a tendency to merge appear in regular scientific journals and categorize the journals in different nuclear physics and high-energy that lately new research evaluation research domains. The definition of the physics journals into one category. This criteria appear. One of the arguments parameters is out of control of the has led to the following situation. A few often used in favor of refereed research groups and evaluation years ago a study was performed where conference proceedings is that it gives committees tend to use criteria that research groups from different more possibilities for PhD students to sometimes do not make sense. European universities were compared become first author on a publication in Furthermore, when the evaluation deals on the basis of the average number of a refereed journal. This is a false with projects or candidates from citations per publication normalized to argument and in the long term the different research fields the measurable the average citation score of the tendency of publishing conference quantities gain more and more relevant science domain. The proceedings in regular journals will hurt importance. In the long term all of this conclusion was that the top group in the our field. will be devastating for our research domain of nuclear physics was from a Nowadays different criteria are used funding. Let me illustrate this with a university where no nuclear physics to evaluate research projects. These few examples. research was performed. After some evaluation processes are important not In our field there are no standard investigation it turned out that this the least for society that has the right to rules for the order of the author list group was excellent in high-energy know if the resources it invests in available and if they exist they physics, publishing frequently in fundamental research—even though definitely differ from rules or habits in Nuclear Physics B. Another more they are scarce—are well spent. It is other fields of science. A recent practice recent example stems from an however difficult to measure the quality at our university requests that new evaluation round whereby groups from of fundamental research projects as its PhD’s have to have at least three different research fields were real quality can often only be judged publications as first author in compared. The parameter used was the after a long time. A way out, that has international journals in order to be number of publications in the “top become common practice, is to eligible for a post-doc grant. journals” of a particular field; “top combine measurable quantities with Publications in conference proceedings journal” being defined as belonging to reports from peer reviewing, with are not accepted, even if they are the top 10% of the journals with
Recommended publications
  • Nuclear Structure Features of Very Heavy and Superheavy Nuclei—Tracing Quantum Mechanics Towards the ‘Island of Stability’
    Physica Scripta INVITED COMMENT Related content - Super-heavy nuclei Nuclear structure features of very heavy and Sigurd Hofmann superheavy nuclei—tracing quantum mechanics - New elements - approaching towards the ‘island of stability’ S Hofmann - Review of metastable states in heavy To cite this article: D Ackermann and Ch Theisen 2017 Phys. Scr. 92 083002 nuclei G D Dracoulis, P M Walker and F G Kondev View the article online for updates and enhancements. Recent citations - Production cross section and decay study of Es243 and Md249 R. Briselet et al - Colloquium : Superheavy elements: Oganesson and beyond S. A. Giuliani et al - Neutron stardust and the elements of Earth Brett F. Thornton and Shawn C. Burdette This content was downloaded from IP address 213.131.7.107 on 26/02/2019 at 12:10 | Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Physica Scripta Phys. Scr. 92 (2017) 083002 (83pp) https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/aa7921 Invited Comment Nuclear structure features of very heavy and superheavy nuclei—tracing quantum mechanics towards the ‘island of stability’ D Ackermann1,2 and Ch Theisen3 1 Grand Accélérateur National d’Ions Lourds—GANIL, CEA/DSM-CNRS/IN2P3, Bd. Becquerel, BP 55027, F-14076 Caen, France 2 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstr. 1, D-62491 Darmstadt, Germany 3 Irfu, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France E-mail: [email protected] Received 13 March 2017, revised 19 May 2017 Accepted for publication 13 June 2017 Published 18 July 2017 Abstract The quantum-mechanic nature of nuclear matter is at the origin of the vision of a region of enhanced stability at the upper right end of the chart of nuclei, the so-called ‘island of stability’.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Contents
    Contents CHEMISTRY International January-March 2019 Volume 41 No. 1 Introduction The International Year of the Periodic Table 2019 2 by Jan Reedijk and Natalia Tarasova Features IUPAC and the Periodic Table by G.J. Leigh 6 Criteria for New Element Discovery: Providing Assurance 10 in a Field of Allure and Romance by Sigurd Hofmann Looking Backwards and Forwards at the Development 16 of the Periodic Table by Eric Scerri Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights: History of IUPAC 21 Commission II.1 in the Service of Chemistry by John R. De Laeter IUPAC Commission II.1 Today by Juris Meija 24 Isotopes Matter by Norman E. Holden, Tyler B. Coplen, and Peter Mahaffy 27 The New SI: The International System of Units is Getting 32 a Makeover by Ian Mills and Roberto Marquardt IUPAC Wire Election of IUPAC Officers and Bureau Members 36 Juris Meija Made the Top 40 Under 40 37 C. Oliver Kappe is Awarded the 2018 IUPAC-ThalesNano Prize 37 for Flow Chemistry OPCW to Further Enhance Contributions to United Nations’ 38 Sustainable Development Goals 1001 Inventions: Journeys from Alchemy to Chemistry 38 Stamps International 39 Project Place Critical evaluation of homogeneous equilibrium and solubility 40 constants of gadolinium in environmental and biological- relevant conditions 23rd UNESCO/IUPAC Postgraduate Course in Polymer Science 40 Guidance for the Compilation, Critical Evaluation and 40 Dissemination of Chemical Data Making an imPACt On the Discovery of New Elements (IUPAC/IUPAP 42 Provisional Report) IUPAC Periodic Table of the Elements and Isotopes
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Element 112 Named 'Copernicium' 24 February 2010
    Chemical element 112 named 'Copernicium' 24 February 2010 IUPAC (International Union of Pure and Applied Copernicium is the sixth chemical element GSI Chemistry) accepted the name proposed by the scientist named. The other elements carry the international discovering team around Sigurd names Bohrium (element 107), Hassium (element Hofmann at the GSI Helmholtzzentrum. The team 108), Meitnerium (element 109), Darmstadtium had suggested "Cp" as the chemical symbol for the (element 110), and Roentgenium (element 111). 21 new element. However, since the chemical symbol scientists from Germany, Finland, Russia, and "Cp" gave cause for concerns, as this abbreviation Slovakia collaborated in the GSI experiments that also has other scientific meanings, the discoverers lead to the discovery of element 112. and IUPAC agreed to change the symbol to "Cn". Copernicium is 277 times heavier than hydrogen, More information: 'Copernicium' proposed as making it the heaviest element officially recognized name for newly discovered element 112 -- by IUPAC. www.physorg.com/news166791177.html The suggested name "Copernicium" in honor of Nicolaus Copernicus follows the tradition of naming chemical elements after merited scientists. IUPAC Provided by Helmholtz Association of German officially announced the endorsement of the new Research Centres element's name on February 19th, Nicolaus Copernicus' birthday. Copernicus was born on February 19, 1473 in Toru?, Poland. His work in the field of astronomy is the basis for our modern, heliocentric world view, which states that the Sun is the center of our solar system with the Earth and all the other planets circling around it. An international team of scientists headed by Sigurd Hofmann was able to produce the element copernicium at GSI for the first time already on February 9, 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Stefan Schramm Mirko Schäfer Editors New Horizons in Fundamental Physics FIAS Interdisciplinary Science Series
    FIAS Interdisciplinary Science Series Series Editor: Walter Greiner Stefan Schramm Mirko Schäfer Editors New Horizons in Fundamental Physics FIAS Interdisciplinary Science Series Editor-in-chief Walter Greiner, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Editorial Board Ernst Bamberg, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Marc Thilo Figge, Jena, Germany Thomas Haberer, Heidelberg, Germany Volker Lindenstruth, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Joachim Reinhardt, Frankfurt, Germany Klaus Schulten, Urbana, USA Wolf Singer, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Horst Stöcker, Darmstadt, Germany The Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS) is an independent research institute pursuing cutting-edge theoretical research in the areas of physics, life-science and chemistry, neuroscience, and computer science. A central aim of FIAS is to foster interdisciplinary co-operation and to provide a common platform for the study of the structure and dynamics of complex systems, both animate and inanimate. FIAS closely cooperates with the science faculties of Goethe University (Frankfurt) and with various experimentally oriented research centers in the vicinity. The series is meant to highlight the work of researchers at FIAS and its partner institutions, illustrating current progress and also reflecting on the historical development of science. The series comprises monographs on specialized current research topics, reviews summarizing the state of research in more broadly-framed areas, and volumes of conferences organized by FIAS. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/10781
    [Show full text]
  • IUPAC Wire See Also
    News and information on IUPAC, its fellows, and member organizations. IUPAC Wire See also www.iupac.org/news Naming Ceremony for Element 112 at GSI. The new element has officially carried the in Darmstadt name copernicium and the symbol “Cn” since 19 February 2010.* Naming the element after scientist n 12 July 2010, the chemical element Nicolaus Copernicus follows the longstanding tradi- with the atomic number 112 was “chris- tion of choosing an accomplished scientist as eponym. Otened” copernicium at the Gesellschaft für Copernicus’ work in astronomy is the basis of our Schwerionenforschung (GSI) in Darmstadt, Germany, modern world view, which states that the Sun is the where it was discovered. This symbolic christen- center of our solar system with the Earth and all the ing celebrated the element’s eternal entry into the other planets circling around it. periodic table of elements. Copernicium is 277 times Copernicium is the sixth chemical element that GSI heavier than hydrogen and the heaviest element scientists discovered and named. The other elements officially recognized in the periodic table. Its name carry the names bohrium (element 107), hassium (ele- honors the great astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus ment 108), meitnerium (element 109), darmstadtium (1473–1543). (element 110), and roentgenium (element 111). *www.iupac.org/publications/ci/2010/3202/iw1_copernicus.html www.gsi.de/portrait/presse/Pressemeldungen/12072010_e.html InChI 1.03 Released The July 2010 celebration of element 112 at Gesellschaft he InChI Trust and IUPAC are pleased to fü r Schwerionenforschung (Center for Heavy Ion announce the release of a new version of the Research) in Darmstadt, Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Specific Parameters for Some Isotopes of Copernicium and Flerovium
    Science Front Publishers Journal for Foundations and Applications of Physics , 3 (2), (2016) (sciencefront.org) ISSN 2394-3688 Specific parameters for some isotopes of copernicium and flerovium Anjana Acharya *, Trupti Sahoo & Bibhas R Attreya Department of Physics, Veer Surendra Sai University of Technology Burla, Odisha-768018, India *Corresponding author E-mail : [email protected] (Received 24 April 2016, Accepted 04 June 2016, Published 14 June 2016) Abstract Super heavy elements (SHE) in the periodic table are generally transuranic and transactinide elements having Z > 92. Here, some of the properties of two super heavy elements viz. Copernicium (Cn) and Flerovium (Fl) are discussed. The half life time, transition probability, Gamow’s factor, disintegration constant are calculated for these super heavy elements and compared with other values. ©2016 Science Front Publishers Keywords : Transition probability, semi empirical mass formula, disintegration constant, tunneling effect 1. Introduction From the early days of the synthesis of heavier transuranic elements, it was predicted that since such heavy elements did not occur in nature, they would have shorter and shorter half lives. A doubly magic isotope having magic numbers of proton and neutrons would be stabilized against radioactive decay. The doubly magic isotope after lead-208 is flerovium-298 with 114 protons and 184 neutrons. It forms the centre of a so called ‘island of stability’. This island of stability centering around elements 112-118 comes just after a ‘sea of instability’ from elements 101-111. The Flerovium isotopes in it were speculated in 1966 and it’s half lives were estimated to be more than a hundred million years.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Status and Future Prospects on Super Heavy Nuclei Research (Summary of the Symposium)
    SUPER HEAVY NUCLEI International Symposium Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA March 31 – April 02, 2015 http://cyclotron.tamu.edu/she2015 Current Status and Future Prospects on Super Heavy Nuclei Research (Summary of the Symposium) Witold Nazarewicz, FRIB/NSCL, MSU, USA; Sigurd Hofmann and Gottfried Mȗnzenberg, GSI, Helmholtzzentrum, Germany; Joseph Natowitz, TAMU, USA; Yuichiro Nagame, ASRC, JAEA, Japan Robert Eichler, PSI-University of Bern, Switzerland; James Roberto, ORNL, USA Sidney Gales, INPN Orcay/CNRS, France; Yuri Oganessian, FLNR-JINR, Russia Current Status During the SHE 2015 meeting, all aspects of one of the key questions in Nuclear Physics, the synthesis and properties of Super Heavy Elements (SHE) were discussed. Since 1981, remarkable progress has been made in synthesis of new heavy and super-heavy nuclei (SHN). Six new elements (Z = 107 to 112) have been produced and identified in ‘cold’ fusion reactions and six (Z = 113 to 118) in ‘hot’ fusion reactions. The nuclei were produced at accelerators delivering beams of heavy ions from calcium to zinc at intensities of about 1 pµA (1 pµA = 6.24×1012 particles/s). In-flight separation is now commonly used for element discovery and for pre-separation for chemistry experiments. The new nuclei were efficiently separated from the beam by vacuum or gas-filled recoil separators. Position sensitive detector systems were used for identification and measurement of the decay properties. The experiments were sensitive enough to measure cross-sections as low as 0.02 pb for synthesis of 278113 in the reaction 70Zn + 209Bi. However, the experiments also revealed an increase of cross-sections up to 8.5 pb for synthesis of 288115 in the reaction 48Ca + 243Am, the latter increase attributed to the approach of the compound nuclei to a predicted island of stability at Z=114 and N=184.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Discovery of New Elements (IUPAC/IUPAP Provisional Report)
    Pure Appl. Chem. 2018; 90(11): 1773–1832 Provisional Report Sigurd Hofmanna,*, Sergey N. Dmitrieva, Claes Fahlanderb, Jacklyn M. Gatesb, James B. Robertoa and Hideyuki Sakaib On the discovery of new elements (IUPAC/IUPAP Provisional Report) Provisional Report of the 2017 Joint Working Group of IUPAC and IUPAP https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2018-0918 Received August 24, 2018; accepted September 24, 2018 Abstract: Almost thirty years ago the criteria that are currently used to verify claims for the discovery of a new element were set down by the comprehensive work of a Transfermium Working Group, TWG, jointly established by IUPAC and IUPAP. The recent completion of the naming of the 118 elements in the first seven periods of the Periodic Table of the Elements was considered as an opportunity for a review of these criteria in the light of the experimental and theoretical advances in the field. In late 2016 the Unions decided to estab- lish a new Joint Working Group, JWG, consisting of six members determined by the Unions. A first meeting of the JWG was in May 2017. One year later this report was finished. In a first part the works and conclusions of the TWG and the Joint Working Parties, JWP, deciding on the discovery of the now named elements are summarized. Possible experimental developments for production and identification of new elements beyond the presently known ones are estimated. Criteria and guidelines for establishing priority of discovery of these potential new elements are presented. Special emphasis is given to a description for the application of the criteria and the limits for their applicability.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Ontology of Superheavy Elements
    Firenze University Press www.fupress.com/substantia Research Article On the Ontology of Superheavy Elements Citation: H. Kragh (2017) On the Ontology of Superheavy Elements. Helge Kragh Substantia 1(2): 7-17. doi: 10.13128/ substantia-25 Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, Copenhagen, Denmark E-mail: [email protected] Copyright: © 2017 H. Kragh. This is an open access, peer-reviewed article published by Firenze University Press Abstract. The study of so-called superheavy elements with atomic numbers Z > 102 (http://www.fupress.com/substantia) has for several decades been a major research field in nuclear physics and chemistry. and distribuited under the terms of the Presently all elements up to and including Z = 118 have been discovered and assigned Creative Commons Attribution License, official names by IUPAC. To speak of “discovery” is however unfortunate since the ele- which permits unrestricted use, distri- ments are in reality produced, manufactured or created in the laboratory. They are not bution, and reproduction in any medi- found in nature. Moreover, it is not obvious that they exist in the normal sense of the um, provided the original author and source are credited. term or that they can be called elements at all. Apart from sketching the history of transuranic and superheavy elements, the paper focuses on some of the philosophical Data Availability Statement: All rel- issues which are relevant to the synthesis of very heavy elements at the end of the peri- evant data are within the paper and its odic table. In addition, the relationship between superheavy elements and exotic atoms Supporting Information files.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Superheavy Elements: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives 1. Introduction
    1 The Search for Superheavy Elements: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives Helge Kragh* Abstract: The heaviest of the transuranic elements known as superheavy elements (SHE) are produced in nuclear reactions in a few specialized laboratories located in Germany, the U.S., Russia, and Japan. The history of this branch of physical science provides several case studies of interest to the philosophy and sociology of modern science. The story of SHE illuminates the crucial notion of what constitutes a chemical element, what the criteria are for discovering a new element, and how an element is assigned a name. The story also cast light on the sometimes uneasy relationship between physics and chemistry. It is far from obvious that elements with Z > 110 exist in the same sense as oxygen or sodium exists. The answers are not given by nature but by international commissions responsible for the criteria and evaluation of discovery claims. The works of these commissions and of SHE research in general have often been controversial. 1. Introduction Beyond uranium the periodic table includes no less than 26 elements which have all been manufactured in the laboratory and the best known of which is plutonium of atomic number 94. The heaviest of the transuranic elements are often called “superheavy elements” (SHE), a term with no precise meaning but which often refers to the transactinide elements with Z ranging from 103 to 120. In some cases the term is used only for Z > 110. So far the last of the superheavy elements is Z = 118, a substance which received official recognition as an element in 2016 and is named oganesson, chemical symbol Og.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Find the Symposium's Abstracts Here
    Super Heavy Nuclei 2015 0.8 ) 2 248Cm + 48Ca A + 1 0.6 ) / (A 2 A - 1 (A 208Pb + 88Se QF 0.4 0.2 CN QF 164 132 mass asymmetry Dy + Sn compound nucleus area 0 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 R12 (fm) Z1A1,b1 Z2A2,b2 Texas A&M University College Station Texas March 31 - April 02, 2015 International Symposium Super Heavy Nuclei 2015 Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA March 31 - April 02, 2015 March 31, 2015 8:45 9:00 0:15 Opening Introduction Chair: Robert Tribble BNL, USA Witold Nazarewicz 9:00 9:40 0:40 Superheavy Nuclei: Theoretical Challenges FRIB/NSCL MSU, USA Yuri Oganessian 9:40 10:20 0:40 Symposium on Super Heavy Nuclei: Our Expectations FLNR-JINR, Dubna/TAMU Russia/USA 10:20 10:30 0:10 Discussion 10:30 10:50 0:20 Coffee Beak At the Border of the Island of the Super Heavy Nuclei Sigurd Hofmann Super-Heavy Nuclei: Current Status And Futur 10:50 11:20 0:30 GSI Helmholtzzentrum, Germany Developments Vladimir Utyonkov Synthesis of Superheavy Nuclei at Limits of Stability: 11:20 11:40 0:20 FLNR-JINR, Dubna, Russia 239,240Pu + 48Ca and 249-251Cf + 48Ca Reactions Kosuke Morita 11:40 12:00 0:20 SHE research at RIKEN/GARIS RIKEN Nishina Center, Japan Anatoli Afanasjev Recent progress in the study of the heaviest nuclei in 12:00 12:20 0:20 Mississippi State University, USA covariant density functional theory William H. Bassichis 12:20 12:25 0:05 Ancient Map: Island of Stability Texas A&M University, USA 12:25 12:45 0:20 Discussion 12:45 14:00 1:15 Lunch Decay Properties and Nuclear Structure of the Heaviest Nuclei Chair: Teng Lek Khoo
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 the Search for “Heavy” Elements
    Nuclear Science—A Guide to the Nuclear Science Wall Chart ©2019 Contemporary Physics Education Project (CPEP) Chapter 8 The Search for “Heavy” Elements The known chemical elements are arranged (Fig. 8-1) in a pattern that relates their chemical properties. That arrangement is called the “Periodic Table”, and is the fundamental tool for physicists and chemists. The elements are arranged in groups (columns) indicative of similar chemical properties and periods (rows) indicative of electronic shell occupation. To a person who understands how to read the periodic table, an enormous amount of elementary properties can be discerned – for example, which element might bond with which other elements and in what ratios to form chemical compounds, which elements are metallic and which are not. The first periodic table was constructed in 1869 by Dmitri Mendeleev. Other scientists had noticed repeating patterns or periodicity in the various known elements (at that time only 63 elements were known), but Mendeleev was the first to boldly use his table to predict the existence of as yet unknown elements and actually leave spaces in his chart for them. Several elements (Ga and Ge for example) where found in subsequent years, based on his predictions of their expected masses and chemical properties, cementing the form and usefulness of the periodic table. UNESCO declared 2019 the International Year of the Periodic Table in honor of the 150th anniversary of the first periodic table. Fig. 8-1. The Periodic Table. Reference https://iupac.org/what-we-do/periodic-table-of-elements/ Each element is uniquely defined by proton number, Z.
    [Show full text]