P2-Apr 2002 Vol 8 No 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

  • I
  • N
  • T
  • E
  • R
  • N
  • A
  • T
  • I
  • O
  • N
  • A
  • L

Journal of Wilderness

  • APRIL 2002
  • VOLUME 8, NUMBER 1

  • FEATURES
  • EDUCATION AND COMMUNICATION

EDITORIAL PERSPECTIVES

34

31 Running with the Wild Dogs

Global Wilderness Management Education in Africa

BY MALCOLM DRAPER and ALAN WATSON

Wilderness and IJW as the Century Begins

BY JOHN C. HENDEE

SOUL OF THE WILDERNESS

School Of Lost Borders

33

The 7th World Wilderness Congress

Wilderness and Human Communities

BY VANCE G. MARTIN and ANDREW MUIR

Establishes International “Wilderness Passage Rites” Degree

INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES
STEWARDSHIP

The Zambezi River

Wilderness and T o urism

BY SALLY WYNN

34

A Summary of the Report

10

Ensuring the Stewardship of the National Wilderness Preservation System

BY PERRY J. BROWN

One Year in the Arctic Wilderness

A Surgeon ’ s Vision for Youth Expeditions

BY MARK EVANS

40

Keeping It Wild

13

Be Involved in Wilderness Management!

BY TINAMARIE EKKER

WILDERNESS DIGEST

Announcements and Wilderness Calendar

43 46 47

SCIENCE AND RESEARCH

PERSPECTIVES FROM THE ALDO LEOPOLD

19

Letters to the Editor

WILDERNESS RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Managing the Density of Recreation Use

  • in Wilderness
  • Book Reviews

Plundered Promise: Capitalism, Politics and the Fate of the Federal Lands

BY DAVID N. COLE

By Richard Behan

20 Restoring Wildness?

Conservation Management on The Isle of Rum

BY BRIAN WOOD

REVIEW BY JOHN SHULTIS

The World and the Wild: Expanding Wilderness Conservation Beyond Its American Roots

Edited by David Rothenberg and Marta Ulvaeus

REVIEW BY JOHN SHULTIS

24

Wilderness Attribute Mapping in the United Kingdom

BY STEVE CARVER, ANDY EVANS, and STEFFEN FRITZ

The large FRONT COVER photo shows yuccas at 1,636 m. elevation in Sierra Peña Nevada, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. INSERT PHOTO is of a delicate but pointy cactus in flower, Sierra Madre Oriental, San Luis Potosi, Mexico. Both photos © 2001 courtesy of Alan Watson/Forest Light.

Rocky Terrain

30

A Look at the Risks in the Outdoor Adventure Industry

A Research Report by the ST. PAUL INSURANCE COMPANIES and OUTWARD BOUND, USA. Reviewed by STEVE HOLLENHORST and KEITH RUSSELL

International Journal of Wilderness

The International Journal of Wilderness links wilderness professionals, scientists, educators, environmentalists, and interested citizens worldwide with a forum for reporting and discussing wilderness ideas and events; inspirational ideas; planning, management, and allocation strategies; education; and research and policy aspects of wilderness stewardship.

EXECUTIVE EDITORS

Alan W. Ewert, Indiana University, Bloomington, Ind., USA Vance G. Martin, WILD Foundation, Ojai, Calif., USA
Alan Watson, Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Missoula, Mont., USA John Shultis, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, B.C., Canada

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

John C. Hendee, Director, University of Idaho Wilderness Research Center, Moscow, Idaho, USA

CO-MANAGING EDITORS

Chad Dawson, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, N.Y., USA
Steve Hollenhorst, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USA

WEB MASTER

Wayne A. Freimund, University of Montana, Missoula, Mont., USA

ASSOCIATE EDITORS—INTERNATIONAL

Gordon Cessford, Department of Conservation, W e llington, New Zealand; Karen Fox, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Les Molloy, Heritage W o rks, W e llington, New Zealand; Andrew Muir, South African Wilderness Leadership School, Durbin, South Africa; Ian Player, South Africa National Parks Board and The Wilderness Foundation, Howick, Natal, Republic of South Africa; Vicki A. M. Sahanatien, Fundy National Park, Alma, Canada; Won Sop Shin, Chungbuk National Universit y , C hungbuk, Korea; Anna-Liisa Sippola, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland; Pamela Wright, Bamfield Marine Station, Bamfield, B.C., Canada; Franco Zunino, Associazione Italiana per la Wilderness, Murialdo, Ital y .

ASSOCIATE EDITORS—UNITED STATES

Greg Aplet, The Wilderness Societ y , D enve r , C olo.; Liz Close, U.S. Forest Service, W a shington D.C.; David Cole, Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Missoula, Mont.; John Daigle, University of Maine, Orono, Maine; Lewis Glenn, Outward Bound USA, Garrison, N. Y . ; Glenn Haas, Colorado State Univer- sit y , F ort Collins, Colo.; Troy Hall, University of Idaho, Mosco w , I daho; Dr. William Hammit, Clemson Universit y , C lemson, S.C.; Greg Hansen, U.S. Forest Service, Mesa, Ariz.; Dave Harmon, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oreg.; Bill Hendricks, California Polytechnic State Universit y , S an Luis Obispo, Calif.; Ed Krumpe, University of Idaho, Mosco w , I daho; Jim Mahoney, Bureau of Land Management, Sierra Vista, Ariz.; Bob Manning, University of V e rmont, Burlington, Vt.; Jeffrey Marion, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, V a .; Leo McAvoy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.; Michael McCloskey, Sierra Club, Washington, D.C.; Christopher Monz, Dean, Sterling College, Craftsbury Common, Vt.; Bob Muth, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.; Connie Myers, Arthur Carhart Wilderness T r aining Cente r , M issoula, Mont.; Roderick Nash, University of California, Santa Barbara, Calif.; David Ostergren, Northern Arizona Universit y , F lagstaff, Ariz.; Marilyn Riley, Wilderness T r ansitions and the Wilderness Guides Council, Ross, Calif.; Joe Roggenbuck, Vir- ginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, V a .; Holmes Rolston III, Colorado State Universit y , F t. Collins, Colo.; Mitch Sakofs, Outward Bound, Garrison, N. Y . ; Susan Sater, U.S. Forest Service, Portland, Oreg.; Tod Schimelpfenig, National Outdoor Leadership School, Lande r , W yo.; Jerry Stokes, U.S. Forest Service, W a shington, D.C.; Elizabeth Thorndike, Cornell Universit y , I thaca, N. Y . ; Jay Watson, The Wilderness Societ y , S an Francisco, Calif.

International Journal of Wilderness (IJW) publishes three issues per year

(April, August, and December). IJW is a not-for-profit publication.
Submissions: Contributions pertinent to wilderness worldwide are solicited, including articles on wilderness planning, management, and allocation strategies; wilderness education, including descriptions of key programs using wilderness for personal growth, therapy, and environmental education; wilderness-related science and research from all disciplines addressing physical, biological, and social aspects of wilderness; and international perspectives describing wilderness worldwide. Articles, commentaries, letters to the editor, photos, book reviews, announcements, and information for the wilderness digest are encouraged. A complete list of manuscript submission guidelines is available from the editors.
Manuscripts to: University of Idaho, Wilderness Research Center, Moscow, ID 83844-1144, USA. Telephone: (208) 885-2267. Fax: (208) 885-2268. E-mail: [email protected].

Business Management and Subscriptions: WILD Foundation, P.O. Box 1380, Ojai, CA 93024, USA. Fax: (805) 640-0230. E-mail: [email protected].

Subscription rates (per volume calendar year): Subscription costs are in U.S. dollars only—$30 for individuals and $50 for organizations/ libraries. Subscriptions from Canada and Mexico, add $10; outside North America, add $20. Back issues are available for $15.
Artwork: Submission of artwork and photographs with captions are encouraged. Photo credits will appear in a byline; artwork may be signed by the author.

All materials printed in the International Journal of Wilderness, copyright

© 2002 by the International Wilderness Leadership (WILD) Foundation. Individuals, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of material from the journal. ISSN # 1086-5519.
World Wide Website: www.ijw.org. Printed on recycled paper.

SPONSORING ORGANIZATIONS

• Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute • Indiana University, Department of Recreation and Park Administration • National

®

Outdoor Leadership School (NOLS) • Outward Bound • SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry • The WILD Foundation • The Wilderness Society • University of Idaho Wilderness Research Center • University of Montana, School of Forestry and Wilderness Institute • USDA Forest Service • USDI Bureau of Land Management • USDI Fish and Wildlife Service • USDI National Park Service • Wilderness Foundation (South Africa) • Wilderness Inquiry • Wilderness Leadership School (South Africa)

2

International Journal of Wilderness

APRIL 2002 • VOLUME 8, NUMBER 1

FEATURES

E D I T O R I A L P E R S P E C T I V E S

Wilderness and IJW as the
Century Begins

BY JOHN C. HENDEE

his issue of the IJW (vol. 8, no. 1) begins our eighth year of publication. When the IJW began in 1995, there was excitement and optimism for the role of reflected in the preceding seven

years of the IJ W . This issue dem-

onstrates the diverse and international wilderness interests that have evolved. Vance Martin, USA, and Andrew Muir, South Africa, report on the November 2001 7th WWC. Perry Brown, leader of a U.S. wilderness stewardship evaluation committee presents a summary report of their review and recommendations. Tina Ekker of Wilderness Watch, USA, describes how citizens can—and must—get in-

T

wilderness in the expanding environmental movement worldwide. Many important wilderness events followed.
The past seven years have seen important growth in wilderness systems in the United States and around the world. Two more World Wilderness Congresses (WWCs) have been held—the 6th WWC in 1998 held in Bangalore, India, and the 7th WWC in 2001 held in Port Elizabeth, South Africa, substantially contributing to the wilderness cultural and technical literature with their proceedings, and expanding the relevance of wilderness internationally. In the United States, the Arthur Carhart Wilderness Training Center has trained hundreds of federal resource managers in wilderness stewardship nationwide, and they now are assisting other countries. The Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute provides leadership for wilderness research nationwide and internationally, and it sponsored the largest ever wilderness science conference in 1999, generating a five-volume proceedings. The University of Montana Wilderness Institute established an online network for easy access to wilderness information for managers, scientists, citizens and students (www.wilderness. net). Wilderness advocates, led by The Wilderness Society (but including many local and regional groups) have strengthened the sophistication and information base of their proposals, making wilderness initiatives all the more compelling. Wilderness experience programs aimed at personal growth and inspiration, led by organizations such as Outward Bound, the National Outdoor Leadership School, and Wilderness Inquiry, have created a movement now involving hundreds of programs worldwide for youth and adults.

Article author John C. Hendee.

volved in wilderness stewardship to support and critique agency efforts. David Cole, eminent wilderness scientist, USA, provides perspective on managing density of wilderness recreation use.
International articles report on restoring wilderness on the
Isle of Rum (Brian Wood); wilderness attribute mapping in the United Kingdom (Steve Carver, Andy Evans, and Steffen Fritz); global wilderness management training in Africa (Malcolm Draper and Alan Watson); and wilderness and tourism on the Zambezi River (Sally Wynn). Mark Evans gives his “surgeon’s vision” of one year in the Arctic wilderness, and Kevin Proescholdt reports on what 75 years of protection can do (in the Boundary Waters Wilderness of Northern Minnesota).
Enjoy this issue, and stay involved in the wilderness

movement with the IJ W .

JOHN C. HENDEE is IJW editor-in-chief, Professor and Director of the University of Idaho Wilderness Research Center. E-mail: [email protected].

Today wilderness has a stronger presence in natural resource conservation than ever before. This progress and promise is

International Journal of Wilderness

APRIL 2002 • VOLUME 8, NUMBER 1

3

FEATURES

S O U L O F T H E W I L D E R N E S S

The 7th
World Wilderness Congress

Wilderness and Human Communities

BY VANCE G. MARTIN and ANDREW MUIR

he World Wilderness Congress (WWC) returned to its African roots in November 2001 when it met in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. The 7th WWC—
Africa (Port Elizabeth), 2001—and is the longest-running international public environmental forum. A project of The WILD Foundation, each WWC is hosted by a local nongovernmental organization (NGO) in partnership with WILD and a number of relevant host-country organizations, agencies, and companies. The WWC has no central, ongoing budget and must raise its funds each time from local, regional, and international sources. It meets when timing, issues, needs, and resources converge.
In the recognition that the world is only diversifying more rapidly and in all ways, an important principle in planning and implementing the WWC is “focused diversity.” Despite the difficulties inherent in such an approach, solutions are ultimately more effective and long-lasting when crafted by diverse but focused input—including technical, cultural, political, financial, social, and spiritual—and through a process that utilizes different methods of thinking, assimilation, and living. Therefore, the WWC is multidisciplinary and involves a range of people and perspectives—from ministers of state to philosophers, scientists to game rangers, businesspeople to artists—representing government, education, the private sector, and NGOs.

T

after a planning period beset with political, financial, timing, and terrorism-related issues—was arguably the most productive of the WWC series, which began in Africa in 1977. And, by unanimous agreement, both the debate and the after-hours sessions were filled with an enlivening spirit that overpowered the issues and obstacles, making the road to practical accomplishments both productive, enjoyable, and full of hope and anticipation.
The WWC has convened seven times—South Africa
(Johannesburg), 1977; Australia, 1980; Scotland, 1983; United States, 1987; Norway, 1993; India, 1998; South

In planning the 7th WWC and aiming for quality objectives and accomplishments, an even higher priority than usual was placed on professional, racial, and gender diversity. This began with the membership of the Executive Committee itself, which was charged with overseeing all aspects of the 7th WWC, and included senior figures in politics, finance, business, and culture from government, private, and NGO sectors—both men and women, the majority being nonwhite. The body of 7th WWC delegates—700

Article co-authors (left to right) Andrew Muir and Vance G. Martin.

4

International Journal of Wilderness

APRIL 2002 • VOLUME 8, NUMBER 1

people from 45 nations—included almost 250 nonwhite field professionals, community activists, and others on full scholarship provided by the 7th WWC. Also among the delegates were 25 to 30 members of South Africa’s National Parliament from the Environment Portfolio Committee—a tremendous symbol of South Africa political interest in the 7th WWC.
The program also reflected significant professional and racial diversity. The content was presented by a majority of either nonwhite professionals, or by multiracial partnerships. Female presenters were encouraged and included as often as possible. Further, the structure of the program was designed to use both right and left brain functions, the heart as well as the head, by interspersing cultural elements, outdoor social functions, and field trips with the normal plenary, working sessions, and panels. In addition, the service aspects of the 7th WWC included, and directed benefits to, many local communities in the local area and in South Africa as a whole—such as the making of delegate badges, briefcases made of native materials, special taxi-driver training, daily cultural programs, community workshops, craft production and sales, and more.

Murphy Morobe, (Chairman, SA National Parks), Chairman of the 7th WCC. Photo © The WILD Foundation.

• Private Sector Wilderness—

Shamwari, a private game reserve outside Port Elizabeth, announced the first private sector wilderness in Africa, and a unique and creative legal structure for its designation. The reserve’s lawyers worked with owner Adrian Gardiner to draft legal title restrictions to declare and protect over 3,000 hectares (7,500 acres)— or 16% of Shamwari—as wilderness, placed under legal servitude to the Wilderness Foundation of South Africa, founded by Ian Player and headed by Andrew Muir. Within 24 hours, other private landowners at the WWC announced that they would do the same, including two from Namibia, Carl Hilker and Albie Brueckner.

As much as it emphasizes a holistic approach to creating conservation solutions, the WWC is also action-oriented and strives to produce practical results through collaboration and cooperation. Some notable results include:

• Immediate Funding—The Glo-

bal Environmental Facility of the World Bank announced grants of $1 million each to the Baviaanskloof Wilderness Area in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa, and to Angola to assist the Kissama Foundation’s work to rehabilitate Angola’s Quiçama National Park.

Credo Mutwa, Zulu prophet and healer, with Gwen Mhlangu and other SA Parliamentarians. Photo © The WILD Foundation.

International Journal of Wilderness

APRIL 2002 • VOLUME 8, NUMBER 1

5

of South Africa, all the way through Namibia, into southern Angola.

• New Fundraising Initiatives—

Additional funding for wilderness will come through three new initiatives: My Acre of Africa, the African Protected Areas Initiative, and the Ian Player Wilderness Experience Scholarship Fund. My Acre of Africa is an Internet-based public fundraising strategy for southern African parks, protected areas, and local communities. (Details are available at www.myacreof africa.com.) The African Protected Areas Initiative is a strategy to be developed and launched at the 5th World Parks Congress in Durban in June 2003 with numerous international agencies, funders, and NGOs to address the need for additional funding for all African protected areas. Finally, a new scholarship program to support members of economically and socially disadvantaged communities in experiencing wilderness areas— the Ian Player Scholarship Fund— was launched and initially funded during the 7th WWC.

Dr. Wangari Maathai (Kenya) and Edward Posey, (Gaia Foundation, UK). Photo © The WILD Foundation.

public parks and private conserva-

• Wilderness Legislation—Wilder-

ness conservation efforts in Africa received a boost through an announcement at the WWC by the government of Namibia that it was in the process of drafting national wilderness legislation to cover both tion areas. There are also plans for a new wilderness national park in southwestern Namibia, as well as a three-country transfrontier park (with wilderness zones) stretching from the Northern Cape Province

• Conservation Education—Private

sector support for environmental education came from Johnnic Holdings Ltd, South Africa’s media giant and one of the country’s largest black-controlled companies. Chairman Cyril Ramaphosa announced that conservation education was now one of only two top priorities in his group’s corporate social and community outreach program.

• Tropical Forests—Potential

United States legislation to help protect tropical forests was also announced at the WWC. Congressman

Linda Tucker, author, discusses a session with Patience Koloko, (President, SA Traditional Healers Association). Photo © The WILD Foundation.

6

International Journal of Wilderness

APRIL 2002 • VOLUME 8, NUMBER 1

E. Clay Shaw announced the imminent introduction into the U.S. Congress of a bill addressing the need to stem the tide of unsustainable logging of tropical forests, using a number of different financial mechanisms such as debt swaps and the buyback of logging rights.

Port Elizabeth Accord

of the

7th World Wilderness Congress

8 N OV E M B E R 2 0 0 1

At this time in our history, when the shadow of uncertainty pervades our thoughts and the presence of peril dictates our actions, all of our aspirations and initiatives must by necessity be positive, determined, visionary, collaborative.
It is with this realization that 700 delegates from 42 nations convened in Port Elizabeth, South Africa, for the 7th World Wilderness Congress.
During the course of a week of presentations, consultations, debates, and decisions by a diverse array of people, cultures, professions, and perspectives, covering both challenges and solutions, some certainties were confirmed, namely that:

Recommended publications
  • Developing a Competitiveness Model for South African National Parks

    Developing a Competitiveness Model for South African National Parks

    Developing a competitiveness model for South African National Parks WH Engelbrecht 20670826 Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Philosophiae Doctor in Tourism Management at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University Promoter: Prof Dr M Saayman Co-Promoter: Prof M Kruger May 2015 i This study is dedicated to my late grandfather and uncle, whose names I was blessed with, but who I never had the opportunity to meet. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank my Heavenly Father for giving me the ability, strength, motivation and perseverance to complete my Doctoral degree. He has guided me with love, compassion and mercy throughout my life and I have no doubt that He will continue to do so. To my father and mother, thank you for your love, support and words of wisdom through the past 26 years and for providing me with the opportunity to study. You are the world’s best parents and I could not have asked for better. Thank you for shaping me into the man that I am today and for having faith in me. To my sister, thanks for always being there, assisting me with my documents and supporting me throughout the years. You have made a lasting impact on my life. I would also like to thank her for translating the Abstract of the study into Afrikaans. To my best friends (Die Japers), Hendrik, Dewald, Willem, and Philip thanks for your unending support, encouragement and friendship during the past years and for understanding when I had to cancel our appointments.
  • Assessments of Occurrence and Distribution of Mammals in Forests of the Garden Route National Park Based on Camera Trapping

    Assessments of Occurrence and Distribution of Mammals in Forests of the Garden Route National Park Based on Camera Trapping

    Page 1 of 7 Short Communication Assessments of occurrence and distribution of mammals in forests of the Garden Route National Park based on camera trapping Authors: Eleven mammal census sites were selected in four different Afrotemperate Forest types in Nicholas Hanekom1 Rodney M. Randall1 the Garden Route National Park, South Africa. At each site, an array of eight camera traps was deployed along trails for between 28 and 45 days. Based on accumulation curves, this Affiliations: was generally sufficient for recording most of the focal mammal species at each site. Only 1 South African National 12 mammal (≥ 1 kg) species were recorded, two of which were primarily wetland species. Parks, Sedgefield, South Africa The most widely captured taxa were bushbuck, Tragelaphus scriptus (all 11 sites); and caracal, Caracal caracal (10 sites). The most frequently photographed species were bushbuck (40%) and Correspondence to: chacma baboon, Papio ursinus (22%). The number of species and total capture rates did not Nicholas Hanekom differ (P > 0.10) between dry (scrub and high) forests and moist (medium-moist to wet) forests, Email: or between small (< 41 km²) forests and a large forest complex. However, at species level, the [email protected] capture rates of caracal and vervet monkey, Chlorocebus pygerythus; were significantly lower (P ≤ 0.05) in the large forest complex than in small forests, whilst those of bushpig, Potamochoerus Postal address: larvatus; were higher. Trapping cycles of between 28 and 45 days, which recorded the highest PO Box 176, Sedgefield 6573, South Africa number of threatened and protected South African species, were from small forests.
  • Case Study of South Africa

    Case Study of South Africa

    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME (UNEP) BIODIVERSITY PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAMME (BPSP) Integrating Biodiversity into the Tourism Sector: Best Practice and Country Case Studies Case study of South Africa Anna Spenceley Institute of Natural Resources Private Bag X01 Scottsville Pietermaritzburg 3209 South Africa Tel: +27 33 3460796 Mobile: +27 82 3604475 Fax: + 27 33 3460895 [email protected] or [email protected] Final Report: February 2001 Acknowledgements This case study was made possible with the expertise and support of a number of people. At the Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism I would like to thank Moeketsi Mosola and Khungeka Njobe for their assistance. Within South African National Parks information was gratefully received from Dirk Fourie, Chris Patton and Annatjie Pelser. Advice was also provided by Dr Maureen Wolfson of the National Botanical Institute; Vuyo Mahlati of the Community Public Private Partnership (CPPP); Clive Poultney of the Tourism and Hospitality Education and Training Authority (THETA); James Seymour of KwaZulu Natal Tourism Authority; and Penny Urquhart of Khanya-managing rural change cc. Thanks also to Trevor Sandwith, Brent Corcoran, and Cecelia Sibeko from the KwaZulu-Natal Nature Conservation Service (KZNNCS) for their assistance, and to both Justin Pooley and Margaret McKenzie at the Institute of Natural Resources. Background to the Case Study The United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) Biodiversity Planning Support Programme (BPSP) has a mandate to provide assistance to national biodiversity planners as they develop and implement their national biodiversity strategy and action plans, or equivalent plans, programmes and policies. The integration of biodiversity into other sectors of the national economy and civil society has been identified as a critical indicator of successful implementation of sustainable development practices and objectives of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).
  • Management Plan

    Management Plan

    Garden Route National Park Park Management Plan For the period 2020 - 2029 1 Acknowledgement This plan was prepared by Mr Len du Plessis and Mr André Spies, with significant input and help from Me Maretha Alant, Mr Clement Arendse, Mr Johan Baard, Me Marie Baard, Me Elzette Bester, Mr Nicholas Cole, Me Melanie de Morney, Mr Graham Durrheim, Dr Stef Freitag-Ronaldson, Me Jessica Hayes, Me Nobulumko Gantsho, Mr Derec Giles, Me Jayshree Govender, Mr Paddy Gordon, Mr Thabo Kgomommu, Me Nondumiso Mgwenya, Dr Mohlamatsane Mokhatla, Me Lizette Moolman, Mr Andile Namntu, Me Phumla Nyathikazi, Mr André Riley, Dr Dirk Roux, Dr Ian Russell, Me Thabang Sibiya, Mr Kyle Smith, Dr Sandra Taljaard, Me Megan Taplin and various stakeholders. Suggested citation: SANParks, 2020. Garden Route National Park Management Plan. SANParks. Pretoria. Photo by: Knysna Tourism Garden Route National Park Management Plan 2020 – 2029 2 Section 1: Authorisation This management plan is hereby internally accepted and authorised as required for managing the Garden Route National Park and World Heritage Site in terms of Sections 39, 40 and 41 of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act [(Act No. 57 of 2003) (NEM: PAA)] and chapter 4 of the World Heritage Convention Act (Act No. 49 of 1999). Mr P. Gordon Park Manager: Garden Route National Park Date: 01 June 2019 T PLAN N Mr A.H. Engelbrecht General Manager: Frontier Region Date: 01 June 2019 MANAGEME – Mr. P.S. Mokoena Managing Executive: Parks Date: 01 June 2019 NATIONAL PARK NATIONAL Mr F.G. Mketeni Chief Executive: SANParks Date: 20 November 2019 GARDEN ROUTE Ms J.
  • Sanparks Conference and Function Venues

    Sanparks Conference and Function Venues

    South African National Parks CONFERENCE AND FUNCTION VENUES YOUR NATURAL HERITAGE Sanparks Conference and Function Venues 1. Augrabies Falls National Park .................................................................................... 4 2. Mokala National Park ............................................................................................... 6 3. Karoo National Park .................................................................................................8 4. Mountain Zebra National Park ............................................................................... 10 5. Kruger National Park - Berg-en-Dal ......................................................................... 12 6. Kruger National Park - Mopani ............................................................................... 14 7. Kruger National Park - Skukuza ............................................................................... 16 8. Table Mountain National Park ................................................................................ 18 9. Golden Gate Highlands National Park - Golden Gate Hotel ..................................... 20 10. Garden Route National Park - Wilderness ................................................................22 SANParks, for tranquil and refreshing social and business breakaways For all enquiries and commissionable sales contact: Travel trade: Tel: +27 (0) 12 426 5025 Fax: +27 (0) 12 343 2006 Email: [email protected] Web: www.sanparks.org 1 Introduction South African National Parks (SANParks)
  • Garden Route National Park Draft Park Management Plan

    Garden Route National Park Draft Park Management Plan

    Garden Route National Park Draft Park Management Plan For the period 2020 - 2029 1 Invitation to comment South African National Parks (SANParks) hereby provides you with an opportunity to provide information and to express your opinion, on how the Garden Route National Park (GRNP) will be managed over the next 10 years. How to make effective comments It is important to indicate those objectives and management actions you agree with as well as those with which you disagree. Each submission is important, but those that give reasons for concerns give support where appropriate and offer information and constructive suggestions are most useful. To ensure your submission is as effective as possible, please provide the following: • Make it clear and concise; • List your points according to the subject sections and page numbers in the plan; • Describe briefly each subject or issue you wish to discuss; • Say whether you agree or disagree with any or all of the aims or objectives within each subject or just those of specific interest to you – clearly state your reasons (particularly if you disagree) and provide supportive information where possible; and • Suggest alternatives to deal with issues with which you disagree. Where to send your comments Submissions are welcome for five weeks after the release date of the draft management plan and can be made in writing to: Manager: Park Management Plans PO Box 787 Pretoria 0001 Submissions can also be emailed to [email protected] Photo by: ??? Draft Garden Route National Park Management Plan 2020 – 2029 2 Section 1: Authorisation This management plan is hereby internally accepted and authorised as required for managing the Mapungubwe National Park and World Heritage Site in terms of Sections 39, 40 and 41 of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act [(Act No.
  • Albany Thicket Biome

    Albany Thicket Biome

    % S % 19 (2006) Albany Thicket Biome 10 David B. Hoare, Ladislav Mucina, Michael C. Rutherford, Jan H.J. Vlok, Doug I.W. Euston-Brown, Anthony R. Palmer, Leslie W. Powrie, Richard G. Lechmere-Oertel, Şerban M. Procheş, Anthony P. Dold and Robert A. Ward Table of Contents 1 Introduction: Delimitation and Global Perspective 542 2 Major Vegetation Patterns 544 3 Ecology: Climate, Geology, Soils and Natural Processes 544 3.1 Climate 544 3.2 Geology and Soils 545 3.3 Natural Processes 546 4 Origins and Biogeography 547 4.1 Origins of the Albany Thicket Biome 547 4.2 Biogeography 548 5 Land Use History 548 6 Current Status, Threats and Actions 549 7 Further Research 550 8 Descriptions of Vegetation Units 550 9 Credits 565 10 References 565 List of Vegetation Units AT 1 Southern Cape Valley Thicket 550 AT 2 Gamka Thicket 551 AT 3 Groot Thicket 552 AT 4 Gamtoos Thicket 553 AT 5 Sundays Noorsveld 555 AT 6 Sundays Thicket 556 AT 7 Coega Bontveld 557 AT 8 Kowie Thicket 558 AT 9 Albany Coastal Belt 559 AT 10 Great Fish Noorsveld 560 AT 11 Great Fish Thicket 561 AT 12 Buffels Thicket 562 AT 13 Eastern Cape Escarpment Thicket 563 AT 14 Camdebo Escarpment Thicket 563 Figure 10.1 AT 8 Kowie Thicket: Kowie River meandering in the Waters Meeting Nature Reserve near Bathurst (Eastern Cape), surrounded by dense thickets dominated by succulent Euphorbia trees (on steep slopes and subkrantz positions) and by dry-forest habitats housing patches of FOz 6 Southern Coastal Forest lower down close to the river.
  • Implementing Enterprise GIS at South African National Parks

    Implementing Enterprise GIS at South African National Parks

    GIS technical Implementing Enterprise GIS at South African National Parks by Aubrey Kekana, Manager Corporate GIS, SANParks South African National Parks (SANParks) is a premier conservation agency managing a system of 21 national parks, responsible for conserving the natural and cultural biodiversity of the country, covering a total area of about 4 million hectares. The parks are located in eight of the nine provinces; with only KwaZulu Natal having no SANParks run national park. ANParks is a schedule 3(a) public entity established in terms of the National Parks Act 57 of 1976, and Saccording to the Public Finance Management Act, SANParks is partly funded for its operations from the National Revenue Fund, and thus accountable to Parliament. Our business architecture is founded on three equally important core pillars: • Conservation: wildlife and ecosystems conserved through a system of national parks. • People and conservation: interaction with communities living in and around the parks, building constituencies through environmental education and interpretation of the culture, archaeology and history associated with the parks. • Ecotourism: promotion of South Africa’s ecotourism business, targeted at both the international and Fig. 2: An assesment of the domestic tourism markets. Revenues generated from risk of spread of invasive tourism activities are used to fund the other two pillars’ alien species in the Kruger budgetary requirements. National Park (darker areas represent a high level of The vision of the SANParks is to be the pride and joy of all threat). South Africans and of the world. While the mission of the organisation is to develop and manage a system of national What role does GIS play at SANParks? parks that represents the biodiversity, landscapes and associated heritage assets of South Africa for the sustainable The Kruger National Park has been in the forefront of use and benefit for all.
  • James Gordon Nelson Fonds

    James Gordon Nelson Fonds

    James Gordon Nelson Fonds Extent: 56 m of textual records 8 CD-ROM Date: 1911-2013 1 Personal Series one located in S900 1.1 Biographical 1.2 Publications : books/reports 1.2.1 Access Heritage forum proceedings / edited by A. Gilbert, J.G. Nelson, et al. Heritage Resources Centre occasional paper 10, 1989 SPECIAL COLLECTIONS SB 481 A2A22 1986 SC295 1.2.2 Arctic renewable resources : summary and recommendations / J.G. Nelson. Inuit Tapirisat of Canada Renewable Resources Project, 1975 (3.37) 1.2.3 Banff: a cultural-historical study of land use and management in a national park community to 1945 / Robert C. Scace. J.G. Nelson, series editor, 1968 SPECIAL COLLECTIONS SB 484 C2S3 1968 SC1837 1.2.4 The Canadian National Parks : today and tomorrow : proceedings of a conference organized by The National and Provincial Parks Association of Canada and The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, October 9-15, 1968, vol. 2 / edited by J.G. Nelson and R.C. Scace, 1969 SPECIAL COLLECTIONS SB 481 C35 SC2963 1.2.5 The Canadian National Parks : today and tomorrow : conference II : ten years later : Proceedings of a conference organized by the Faculty of Environmental Studies, University of Waterloo, National and Provincial Parks Association of Canada, and Parks Canada, Department of Indian and Northern Affairs, Banff, Alberta, October 8-13, 1978, vol. 1-2 / edited by J.G. Nelson et al, 1979 SPECIAL COLLECTIONS SB 481 C35 1978 V.1-2 SC4088 1.2.6 Contact : journal of urban and environmental affairs, vol. 11 no. 1, 1979 - The Lake Erie peninsulas : management issues and directions / edited by J.G.
  • The History of SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL PARKS

    The History of SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL PARKS Modern-day SANParks has a long and complex history dating over a century. Below is a timeline of the key events in the Organisation’s history. 1898 The establishment of Sabie Game Reserve (Precursor to the modern-day Kruger National Park) 1926 1903 The formation of the National Parks Board The establishment of the Shingwedzi Game Reserve 1926 1931 The merger of Sabie and Shingwedzi Game Reserves to Kalahari Gemsbok National Park is proclaimed form the Kruger National Park (Precursor to modern-day Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park) 1931 1931 Bontebok National Park is proclaimed The proclamation of Addo Elephant National Park 1937 1963 Mountain Zebra National Park is proclaimed The proclamation of Golden Gate Highlands National Park 1966 1964 The proclamation of Augrabies Falls National Park Tsitsikamma National Park is proclaimed 1979 1985 Karoo National Park is proclaimed The proclamation of West Coast National Park 1986 1986 Vaalbos National Park is proclaimed The proclamation of Tankwa Karoo National Park The park was de-proclaimed in 2002 due to a successful land claim being officially gazetted. 1987 1991 Wilderness National Park is proclaimed Richtersveld National Park is proclaimed as South Africa’s first contractual national park 1994 1994 Marakele National Park is proclaimed (originally as South Africa’s first democratic elections Kransberg National Park) 1995 1998 The proclamation of Vhembe Dongola National Park Mavuso Msimang becomes the first black CEO of the (precursor to Mapungubwe National Park) current SANParks 1998 1998 Evolution of National Parks Board into Cape Peninsula National Park proclaimed – renamed Table South African National Parks – which was Mountain National Park in 2003 later to start using the acronym SANParks, that we all know and use today.
  • Garden Route Towns, Beaches and Game Reserves

    Garden Route Towns, Beaches and Game Reserves

    Game Reserves Game Information by SA supplied Venues.com Garden Route Towns, Beaches and Towns,Route Beaches and Garden The Garden Route is a coastal corridor on the western coast of South Africa, where ancient forests, rivers, wetlands, dunes, stretches of beach, lakes, mountain scenery and indigenous fynbos all merge to form a landscape of restorative beauty.This is a strip of land like no other in the world in terms of beauty, natural attractions and unique flora and fauna - hence its name. Three of South Africa’s top hikes take place here - the Otter Trail and the Tsitsikama and Dolphin trails and man’s footprint has made little impact on the rugged and sometimes inaccessible coastline. The Garden Route is a paradise for eco-lovers, bird watchers and solitude seekers and one of the most beautiful parts of the Western Cape. It lies sandwiched between the Outeniqua Mountains and the Indian Ocean and is on every tourist’s itinerary. The Garden Route is a popular holiday destination during summer and a tranquil hideaway during the winter months - both seasons are equally beautiful and attractive due to the largely Mediterranean climate of the Garden Route.Hit the beachEnjoy a great day out at one of the Garden Route's many excellent beaches. With hundreds of kilometers of coast line and some of the most stunning beaches in the world, visitors to South Africa's Garden Route are bound to find the perfect Garden Route beach. Whether you just fancy a gentle stroll along the sand, a refreshing swim or to ride some waves on your surf board, the GardenRoute offers it all.
  • The Socio-Economic Impact of Tourism in the Karoo National Park

    The Socio-Economic Impact of Tourism in the Karoo National Park

    The Socio-economic impact of Tourism in the Karoo National Park Madelien Ferreira 12776858 B.Com Honours Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree Master of Commercii in Tourism at the Potchefstroom Campus of North West University Study leader: Dr. P. van der Merwe November 2008 i Summary Literature on ecotourism and sustainable tourism emphasises the responsibilities and opportunities in protecting national parks through appropriate tourism development. National parks assist in addressing the economic and social challenges facing local, and mostly small, rural communities adjacent to the national parks. Most of South Africa's national parks are situated in rural areas giving tourists access to villages and towns surrounding the park, contributing to the economic and social upliftment of local communities such as in the case with Karoo National Park (KNP). National Parks in South Africa are seen as major tourism assets due to the wildlife and various activities for international and local visitors, but little is known about the socio-economic impact (contribution) of these parks on their respective local economies and communities. This was first realised by Saayman and Saayman who developed a socio-economic impact model that can be used to do socio-economic impact studies on national parks. Tourists to national parks frequently visit local communities. These tourists then spend money on aspects such as crafts, lodging, food and entrance fees, thus enhancing the economy of the villages/towns in the area. These tourists also have a social impact which can contribute positively or negatively on the quality of life of the local community.