DOCSLIB.ORG

Bosphore Sciences Po – Bosphorus Prize 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bosphore Sciences Po – Bosphorus Prize 2021 2017 LE PRIX SCIENCES PO - BOSPHORE SCIENCES PO – BOSPHORUS PRIZE 2021 www.institut-bosphore.org | www.sciencespo.fr/psia/partnerships#partners MECENE PRINCIPAL MECENES INSTITUTIONNELS AVEC LE SOUTIEN DE MAIN SUPPORTER INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORTERS WITH THE SUPPORT OF Mark Maloney Mark Maloney Doyen intérimaire, Sciences Po PSIA Acting Dean, Sciences Po PSIA « L’École des affaires internationales (PSIA) de « Sciences Po’s Paris School of International Sciences Po attire parmi les meilleurs et les Affairs (PSIA) attracts some of the best and plus brillants étudiants du monde entier. Notre brightest students worldwide. Our goal is to objectif est de former et de façonner ces futurs train and shape these future global actors to acteurs mondiaux pour mieux comprendre et understand and respond to the complexities répondre aux complexités de notre monde. of our world. This collaboration with Institut Notre collaboration avec l’Institut du Bosphore du Bosphore, has helped to foster students’ a contribué à les encourager à s’exposer aux exposure to issues relating to Turkey – questions relatives à la relation triangulaire France – European Union triangular relations. Turquie – France – Union européenne. Au cours Over the past five years, the Sciences Po – des cinq dernières années, l’initiative du Prix Bosphorus Prize initiative has given students Sciences Po – Bosphore a permis aux étudiants the opportunity to think and write about the de réfléchir et de s’exprimer sur les liens interlinkage and engage with common challenges d’interdépendance et de se confronter aux défis of this relationship in political, economic and communs de cette relation dans les domaines cultural fields. At Sciences Po, we are very politique, économique et culturel. Au nom de proud of the quality of our students’ collective Sciences Po, je souhaite exprimer notre grande contribution to these debates, and most grateful fierté pour la qualité de la contribution collective to the Institut du Bosphore for its generous de nos étudiants à ces débats ainsi que notre support. » reconnaissance pour le généreux soutien de l’Institut du Bosphore. » Livio Manzini Livio Manzini Vice-Président, Institut du Bosphore Vice-President, Institut du Bosphore « En tant que l’Institut du Bosphore, nous « As Institut du Bosphore, we are delighted to nous réjouissons de célébrer le cinquième celebrate the fifth anniversary of Sciences Po anniversaire du Prix Sciences Po - Bosphore. – Bosphorus Prize. Our goal in establishing this Notre objectif en mettant en œuvre cette prize was to foster the debate on Turkey – EU – initiative était de favoriser le débat sur les France relations and to mobilize young leaders relations Turquie - UE - France et de mobiliser of tomorrow to take part in strengthening les jeunes leaders de demain à contribuer au the bilateral relations by providing concrete renforcement des relations bilatérales en recommendations. On the occasion of the 5th formulant des recommandations concrètes. anniversary of our partnership, I would like to A l’occasion du 5ème anniversaire de notre congratulate again all winners as well as the 100 partenariat, je voudrais féliciter encore une fois or so other students who submitted very high tous les lauréats ainsi que la centaine d’autres caliber papers in these past years. The selection étudiants qui ont soumis des devoirs de très process, undertaken by jury members from haut niveau ces dernières années. Le processus Institut du Bosphore and Sciences Po was quite d’évaluation mené par les membres du comité difficult. I would therefore like to thank all jury de sélection de l’Institut du Bosphore et de members who gave their time and energy for the Sciences Po était assez difficile. Je tiens donc realization of this Prize. » aussi à remercier tous les membres du jury qui ont donné de leur temps et de leur énergie pour la réalisation de ce prix. » Cérémonie de remise de prix 2017 Award ceremony - Jérôme Sgard, Cérémonie de remise de prix 2018 Award ceremony N. Ümit Boyner, Gürcan Gülersoy, Romuald de Pierrefeu, Bahadır Kaleağası Myriam Ferran, Livio Manzini, Bahadır Kaleağası, Thomas Dumont, Yves Bertoncini 12 avril 2017 12 April 2017 « Croissance européenne, marchés émergents : « European growth, emerging markets: relations économiques et commerciales economic and business relations between Turkey, entre la Turquie, la France et l’Europe » France and Europe» 1er lauréat: Romuald Malcor Deydier de Pierrefeu 1st winner: Romuald Malcor Deydier de Pierrefeu 2ème lauréat : Gürcan Gülersoy 2nd winner : Gürcan Gülersoy 3ème lauréat : Ediz Topcuoğlu 3rd winner : Ediz Topcuoğlu Débat introduit par N.Ümit Boyner, Co-présidente Opening remarks by N. Ümit Boyner, Co-president of du Comité scientifique de l’Institut du Bosphore et the Scientific Committee, Institut du Bosphore and Jérôme Sgard, Professeur d’économie, Sciencs Po, Jérôme Sgard, Professor of Economics, Sciences Po; membre de la faculté de PSIA ; avec Bahadır Kaleağası, PSIA faculty member. Debate with Bahadır Kaleağası, Président de l’Institut du Bosphore et Eckart Woertz, President of Institut du Bosphore and Eckart Woertz, membre de la faculté de PSIA. Modéré par Dorothée PSIA faculty member of Sciences Po, under the Schmid, Chercheur, Responsable du programme moderation of Dorothée Schmid, Researcher, Head of Turquie contemporaine et Moyen-Orient de l’Ifri. ‘Contemporary Turkey’ program at IFRI. 9 avril 2018 9 April 2018 « Repenser l’avenir de l’Europe : « Rethink Europe’s Future: Analyzing new analyse du nouveau positionnement géopolitique de geopolitical positioning of France and Germany la France et de l’Allemagne et leurs implications sur and their implications on Turkey’s European le processus d’intégration européenne de la Turquie » integration process » 1er lauréat : Thomas Dumont 1st winner: Thomas Dumont 2ème lauréate : Eva Fourel 2nd winner : Eva Fourel Débat avec Bahadır Kaleağası, Président de l’Institut du Debate with Bahadır Kaleağası, President of Institut Bosphore et CEO de TÜSİAD, Yves Bertoncini, du Bosphore, CEO of TÜSİAD, Yves Bertoncini, PSIA Enseignant à Sciences Po – PSIA, Président du faculty member, President of European Movement Mouvement Européen France et Pierre Mirel, France and Pierre Mirel, PSIA faculty member; former Enseignant à Sciences Po – PSIA, ancien diplomate diplomat, DG Enlargement, European Commission, du DG Élargissement de la Commission européenne. under the moderation of Laura Batalla, Secretary Modéré par Laura Batalla, Secrétaire Générale, General of European Parliament Turkey Forum. European Parliament Turkey Forum. 17 mai 2019 17 May 2019 « Turquie, France, UE : « Turkey, France, EU: Dans quel cadre faire face aux défis communs? » What scope for solving common challenges? » 1er lauréat: Ediz Topcuoğlu 1st winner: Ediz Topcuoğlu 2ème lauréat : W. Jason Essomba 2nd winner : W. Jason Essomba Debat avec Laurence Daziano, maître de conférences Debate with Laurence Daziano, Institut du Bosphore en économie à Sciences Po et membre du Comité Scientific Committee Member and Lecturer in scientifique de l’Institut du Bosphore etOlivier de Economics at Sciences Po and Olivier de Laroussilhe, Laroussilhe, enseignant à Sciences Po PSIA et chef d’unité Lecturer at PSIA, Sciences Po and Former Head of honoraire (DG Commerce), Commission européenne. Unit (DG Trade), European Commission, under the Modéré par Mark Maloney, directeur exécutif de PSIA moderation of Mark Maloney, Vice Dean, PSIA. Cérémonie de remise de prix 2019 Award ceremony Cérémonie de remise de prix 2019 Award ceremony - Olivier de Laroussilhe, Ediz Denis Simonneau, Ediz Topcuoğlu Topcuoğlu, Laurence Daziano, Jason Essomba, Didem Bora, Mark Maloney 20 mai 2020 20 May 2020 « Villes et communautés durables (ODD 11): « Sustainable cities and communities (SDG 11): Quels modèles, quelles politiques pour renforcer Which models and policies to enhance the la coopération et les partenariats entre la France cooperation and partnerships between France et la Turquie? » and Turkey » 1er lauréate: Mathilde Fraisse 1st winner: Mathilde Fraisse 2ème lauréat : Edward Hainsworth 2nd winner : Edward Hainsworth Debat avec İbrahim Orhan Demir, général adjoint de Debate with İbrahim Orhan Demir, Deputy Secretary la Municipalité Métropolitaine d’Istanbul, Patrick General, Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Klugman, Adjoint à la Maire de Paris, chargé des Patrick Klugman, Deputy Mayor of Paris, in charge of relations internationales, Julien Chiappone-Lucchesi, International Relations, Julien Chiappone-Lucchesi, Directeur rayonnement européen et international, Commissioner for European and International Affairs, Conseiller diplomatique du Maire de Strasbourg, Diplomatic Adviser to the Mayor of Strasbourg, Elise Elise Massicard, Directrice de recherche au CNRS et Massicard, Senior researcher at CNRS and Bahadır Bahadır Kaleağası, Président de l’Institut du Bosphore Kaleağası, President of Institut du Bosphore. 04 mai 2021 04 May 2021 « Redynamiser le multilatéralisme et la «Reinvigorating multilateralism and global coopération mondiale pour un monde post-Covid cooperation for a more inclusive and green post- plus inclusif et plus vert comme levier pour Covid world as a leverage for strengthening renforcer les relations Turquie - France – UE » Turkey – France – EU relationship » 1er lauréat: Louis Callonnec 1st winner: Louis Callonnec 2ème lauréate ex-aequo: Cosima Sagmeister 2nd winner ex-aequo: Cosima Sagmeister 2ème lauréat ex-aequo: Friedemann Schmidt 2nd winner ex-aequo: Friedemann Schmidt Débat
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Turkey and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Boosting the Model Partnership with the United States
    Turkey and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Boosting the Model Partnership with the United States Kemal Kiriş ci turkey project policy paper Number 2 • September 2013 policy paper Number 2, September 2013 About CUSE The Center on the United States and Europe (CUSE) at Brookings fosters high-level U.S.-European dia- logue on the changes in Europe and the global challenges that affect transatlantic relations. As an integral part of the Foreign Policy Program, the Center offers independent research and recommendations for U.S. and European officials and policymakers, and it convenes seminars and public forums on policy-relevant issues. CUSE’s research program focuses on the transformation of the European Union; strategies for en- gaging the countries and regions beyond the frontiers of the EU including the Balkans, Caucasus, Russia, Turkey and Ukraine; and broader European security issues such as the future of NATO and forging com- mon strategies on energy security. The Center also houses specific programs on France, Italy and Turkey. About the Turkey Project Given Turkey’s geopolitical, historical and cultural significance, and the high stakes posed by the foreign policy and domestic issues it faces, Brookings launched the Turkey Project in 2004 to foster informed public consideration, high‐level private debate, and policy recommendations focusing on developments in Turkey. In this context, Brookings has collaborated with the Turkish Industry and Business Association (TÜSİAD) to institute a U.S.-Turkey Forum at Brookings. The Forum organizes events in the form of conferences, sem- inars and workshops to discuss topics of relevance to U.S.-Turkish and transatlantic relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Papers
    - TURKEY PAPERS - TTIP'S ENLARGEMENT AND THE CASE OF TURKEY KEMAL KİRİŞCİ Istanbul Policy Center Bankalar Caddesi No: 2 Minerva Han 34420 Karaköy, İstanbul TURKEY +90 212 292 49 39 +90 212 292 49 57 @ [email protected] ISBN: 978-605-4348-92-3 w ipc.sabanciuniv.edu –TURKEY PAPERS– TTIP’S ENLARGEMENT AND THE CASE OF TURKEY KEMAL KİRİŞCİ January 2015 Editors: Bülent Aras, Professor of International Relations, Sabancı University and Global Fellow, Wilson Center Christian F. Ostermann, Director, Global Europe Program, Wilson Center Kemal Kirişci is the TÜSİAD senior fellow and director of the Center on the United States and Europe’s Turkey Project at Brookings. Before joining Brookings, Kirişci was a professor of international relations and held the Jean Monnet chair in European integration in the department of political science and international relations at Boğaziçi Univer- sity in Istanbul. His areas of research interest include EU-Turkish relations, U.S.-Turkish relations, Turkish foreign and trade policies, European integration, immigration issues, ethnic conflicts and refugee movements. His recent publications include Syrian Refugees and Turkey’s Challenges: Going Beyond Hospitality (Brook- ings, May 2014) and “TTIP and Turkey: The Geopolitical Dimension” in The Geopolitics of TTIP: Reposi- tioning the Transatlantic Relationship for a Changing World Daniel S. Hamilton, ed. (Washington, D.C. Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2014; distributed by Brookings Institution Press). His first paper for Brookings was Turkey and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: Boosting the Model Partnership with the United States (Brookings, September 2013). Kemal Kirişci is the author of several books on Turkey including Turkey and Its Neighbors: Foreign Relations in Transition (co-authored with R.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHIES 20 May 2020
    SCIENCES PO – BOSPHORUS PRIZE 2020 EVENT BIOGRAPHIES 20 May 2020 İ. ORHAN DEMİR Deputy Secretary General, Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Mr. İbrahim Orhan Demir earned his B.Sc. Degree in Urban and Regional Planning at the Middle East Technical University (METU) in 1979. He obtained his M.Sc. degree from the Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Department of Architecture. Mr. Demir worked as a city planner, deputy manager and project manager at the Istanbul Grand Master Plan Bureau, Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IMM) and STFA Engineering, between the years of 1983 and 1994. Since 1986, he has also been involved in urban and regional-level transportation projects such as transportation master plans; highway, tramway, light rail and subway systems’ demand analyses and feasibility studies for various cities and regions in Turkey, especially Istanbul. Mr. Demir has been a part-time lecturer at the Department of City and Regional Planning in Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University’s Faculty of Architecture since 1999, giving lectures and workshops on transportation planning. As of July 26, 2019, Mr. Demir was appointed as the Deputy- Secretary General of the IMM. PATRICK KLUGMAN Deputy Mayor of Paris, in charge of International Relations and the French Speaking World Born in 1977, Patrick KLUGMAN is a lawyer. Engaged in the defense of Human Rights and fundamental freedoms in France and abroad, he regularly campaigns against racism in France. He is elected Councilor of Paris in March 2008, and becomes vice-president of the Socialist group of the Paris city council. Great support of Anne Hidalgo during the 2014 municipal elections in Paris, Patrick KLUGMAN was appointed in April, deputy Mayor of Paris in charge of International Relations and the French speaking world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Security Dimension 27 September 2004, EU Institute For
    Antonio MISSIROLI/Walter POSCH Turkey and/in the EU: The Security Dimension 27 September 2004, EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris The Conference was organised with the explicit intention of plugging in the broader European debate - in the run-up to the reports to be delivered by the Commission on 6 October and with a view to the European Council decision on 17 December – but also of evaluating the potential implications of Turkish membership (or non-membership) for the Union’s security policy. Several Turkish officials and experts were invited to attend and give papers in order to engage in a common assessment of bilateral relations – present and future. I. Overview. After a cursory review of the main arguments (for and against) raised in the current debate over Turkey’s future EU membership, the Conference started with a broad overview of the current state of affairs. First of all, the fact that Ankara’s bid is generating ‘existential problems’ among EU members - it was said - should not be seen by Turkey as a delaying device: it has happened with each and every enlargement, although Turkey is definitely a very special candidate in its own right. Moreover, it is not because of their foreign policy that candidates are (or are not) taken in, although Turkey has a record of alignment with the CFSP acquis that is not as good as that of other candidates. Ankara’s deficit, in this respect, concerns mainly those EU positions that are seen as touching its regional interests; also, it has sometimes refrained from giving relevant information as requested by the Commission in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Message from the President European
    MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY: today’s picture would be very different. The Eu- A CALL FOR ACTION ropean Union would be a better global power, and Turkey would be a stronger European de- Together with TÜSİAD and the Berlin Bosphorus mocracy showing greater convergence with Eu- Initiative, we recently gathered prominent ex- ropean values and interests. The results of the perts and practitioners in European affairs to ex- EU’s failed Turkey policy are clear. change views. We were in search of a more posi- tive relationship between the European Union Problems? Tensions? Conflicts? and Turkey. Our aim was to avoid the mistake of letting current political tensions get in the way Political tensions are real, challenging, and of longer-term, wise, visionary thinking. This harmful. However, non-constructive policies of was an attempt to contribute to “geostrategic disengagement are also part of the problem. Europe”. An approach which may avoid the re- They have been stimulated by years of ever cent past’s mistakes, reinvigorate successful ex- weaker partnership, deadlocks, prejudices, and periences, and better serve common European policy errors from both sides. Thus, we cannot values and citizens’ interests. At least five points find in more negative policies – blocking, sus- were considered for brainstorming: pending, or sanctioning different aspects of the EU-Turkey relationship – a relevant solution to • A sound economic partnership today’s problems. As Albert Einstein would have • Replacing political tensions with structural said: “insanity is doing the same thing over and cooperation over again and expecting different results”. • Promoting European values • Thinking in terms of European integration’s Then what? evolution and global challenges • Open and effective communication with the Certainly, this is not the right time to propose public; avoiding disinformation and opacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    TURKISH INDUSTRIALISTS’ & BUSINESS ASSOCIATION Representation to the EU and UNICE Brussels PRESS RELEASE TURKISH BUSINESS COMMITS TO PLAYING KEY ROLE IN EU ACCESSION TALKS FOCUSING ON DEMOCRACY, ECONOMY, SOCIETY AND TECHNOLOGY November 8, 2005, Brussels The European Commission’s annual progress report on Turkey to be published on 9 November 2005 is an important milestone enhancing the institutional framework of Turkey’s progress towards full EU membership. This year’s report comes in the context of accession talks that started on 3 October. We expect this new phase in the EU-Turkey relationship to be shaped by a more coherent institutional framework and by economic and social progress rather than political uncertainties. TUSIAD will monitor and contribute to this process through its working groups and policy committees covering different chapters of accession talks. TUSIAD's priorities for the next ten years of the EU accession process can essentially be outlined for the following four domains: 1. DEMOCRACY: TUSIAD has been a determined source of pressure and has shown leadership for Turkey’s progress towards sufficiently fulfilling the Copenhagen political criteria. TUSIAD will closely watch the progress of Turkey in executing democratic reforms as it continues with the remaining tasks of that process. The Turkish business community will also make sure that Turkey is a bearer of European values in its policies towards Asia and the Middle East. 2. ECONOMY: The European Commission’s report will identify Turkey as fulfilling market economy status. As a functioning market economy that has integrated with world markets for several decades and having a decade-long customs union with the EU since 1996, Turkey is progressively moving ahead to meet the Maastricht criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccallum Graduate School of Business Bentley University GBE
    McCallum Graduate School of Business Bentley University GBE 790: Manufacturing in the EU and The Changing Dynamics of Turkey's EU Relations March 9-­‐18, 2012 Munich, German and Istanbul, Turkey Cost per student: $5,200 Dr. Alan N. Hoffman Professor of Management Office: MOR 107; Office Phone: (781) -­‐ 891 2287 E-­‐mail: [email protected] REQUIRED READINGS Books: The German Economy: Beyond the Social Market, by Horst Siebert, Princeton University Press, 2005. Read Chapters 1-­‐4, 6. Chapt.1: Basic Features of the German Economy Chapt. 2: The Social Market Economy Chapt. 3: The Weak Growth Performance Chapt.4: The Labor Market: High and Sticky Unemployment Chapt 6: Ageing as a Challenge Over the Next 40 Years. The Government and Politics of The European Union, th 7 edition, Neill Nugent, Palgrave Macmillion, 2010, Parts 1 & 2. Part 1: The Historical Evolution of the EU Part 2: The Evolving Treaty Framework Forces of Fortune: The Rise of the New Muslim Middle Class and What It Will Mean for Our World, by Vali Nasr, The Free Press, 2009. Articles: Turkey in Europe: The Economic Case for Turkish membership of the European Union: 1 Turkey’s Accession to the EU – The Business Case by Rt Hon David Miliband MP, Foreign Secretary Preface by Rt Hon William Hague MP, Shadow Foreign Secretary and senior member of the Shadow Cabinet Introduction: Turkey’s future lies in Europe by Adam Hug, Policy Director, The Foreign Policy Centre 1. Turkey’s economic integration with the EU: A case of win-­‐win interdependence by Olli Rehn, European Commissioner for Enlargement 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Views from the Diaspora November 2013
    Turkey’s Current ‘Process’: Views from the Diaspora November 2013 1 Published by Democratic Progress Institute 11 Guilford Street London WC1N 1DH United Kingdom www.democraticprogress.org [email protected] +44 (0)203 206 9939 First published, November 2013 ISBN: 1-905592-82-5 © DPI – Democratic Progress Institute, 2013 DPI – Democratic Progress Institute is a charity registered in England and Wales. Registered Charity No. 1037236. Registered Company No. 2922108. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee or prior permission for teaching purposes, but not for resale. For copying in any other circumstances, prior written permission must be obtained from the publisher, and a fee may be payable. 2 Contents Foreword ........................................................................................................................ 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 The Meaning of Diaspora: The Kurdish and Turkish Diaspora in Europe ...................... 6 Issues of Concern and the Role of the Diaspora in Conflict Resolution ........................ 9 Language rights ......................................................................................................... 10 Constitutional reform ............................................................................................... 11 Importance of the Regional Context .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Customs Union Between the European Union and Turkey: a New Dimension in a Europe of Variable Geometry
    THE CUSTOMS UNION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND TURKEY: A NEW DIMENSION IN A EUROPE OF VARIABLE GEOMETRY Dr. BAHADIR KALEAGASI On March 6, 1995, the European Union and Tukey agreed, under the terms of the Association Agreement signed in Ankara in 1963, to launch a customs union between them from the beginning of 1996. However, the starting date which is likely be delayed six months, is dependent on two processes - a technical review by the European Commission on whether Turkey has completed its mainly legislative preparations. - the assent of the European Parliament which is showing a determinant sensitivity on human rights and democracy reforms in Turkey. The EU-Turkey Association Council decision of March 6 is supplemented by a resolution on the development of high-level political dialogue between the parties and a financial cooperation package of 375 million ecus. The customs union covers the following areas: Foreign trade Abolition of tariff and non-tariff barriers Common Customs Tariff towards third countries Custom code Liberalization of trade in agro-industrial products Legislative harmonization Competition policy Intellectual and Industrial property protection Rules on state aids Public procurement procedures Standards Environmental policy Agricultural policy Whereas, for Turkey, the customs union represents a step towards full-membership of the EU, seen from Brussels it is economically a major extension of the European single market and politically a much needed answer to the geo-strategic challenge of reenforcing Turkey's European linkage. Actual Debate on the Enlargement of the European Union Discussing the prospects for EU-Turkey relations today implies to focus on the new era of this .
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey-EU-Report.Pdf
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ayca Aydogdu (Moderator): our first part of the series exploring Turkey's relationship with the European Union. Our Dear Ladies and gentlemen, our distinguished question for today, can the EU and Turkey find guests, I would like to welcome you all today to the way forward? And the second and third our panel on the future of Turkey and EU series of this panel will also be held in May and relations. I am Ayca Aydogdu, international June. So let me briefly introduce my guests, news presenter at TRT World and will be your Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey and moderator for this evening. Briefly, let me Director for EU Affairs, Ambassador Faruk introduce our host, The Circle Foundation is a Kaymakci, Director for External Relations at the non-profit independent think-tank based in Secretary General of the European London dedicated to Turkey-UK relations and Commission, Michael Karnitschnig, international issues concerning Turkey. It is Ambassador Michael Sahlin, Distinguished undeniable to say having faced a global crisis Associate Fellow with a SIPRI European such as the Covid-19 pandemic, now a year on Security Programme, a former state secretary in the world suddenly will be fundamentally the Defence Ministry of Sweden and also a different from what it was and whether this will former ambassador to Turkey and the Secretary be a turning point in history. This will only be told General of the Economic Development in time, but one thing is for certain. Global Foundation, associate Professor at the Yildiz cooperation is a must to survive the long lasting Technical University Department of Political damages of this pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Euro-Mediterranean Policies in the Light of the Arab Spring
    03 EUROMED SurVEY OF EXPerTS AND ACTors EURO-MEDITERRANEAN POLICIES IN THE LIGHT OF THE ARAB SPRING 03 EUROMED SurVEY OF EXPerTS AND ACTORS EURO-MEDITERRANEAN POLICIES IN THE LIGHT OF THE ARAB SPRING European Institute of the Mediterranean Consortium formed by: President Artur Mas, President of the Government of Catalonia Vice-Presidents José Manuel García-Margallo, Minister of Foreign Affaires and Cooperation of the Spanish Government Joana Ortega, Vice-President of the Government of Catalonia Xavier Trias, Mayor of Barcelona Town Council President of the Executive Committee Senén Florensa Director General Andreu Bassols Board of Trustees © European Institute of the Mediterranean Girona, 20 08010 Barcelona [email protected] www.iemed.org ISBN: 978-84-393-8885-2 June 2012 Euromed Survey Directors of the Survey Senén Florensa, President of Executive Committee, IEMed Andreu Bassols, Director General, IEMed Josep Ferré, Director Manager, IEMed IEMed ScientificT eam and Editors of the Survey Report Xavier Aragall, Technical Advisor on Euromed Policy Jordi Padilla, Mediterranean Yearbook and Euromed Documentary Sources Coordinator Marta Pont, Junior Research Fellow Qualitative Analysis Kalliope Agapiou-Josephides, Jean Monnet Chair, University of Cyprus, Nicosia Rabha Allam, Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies (ACPSS), Cairo Ali Bilgic, Assistant Professor at Bilkent University, Department of International Relations, Ankara Giorgos Charalambous, University of Cyprus, Nicosia Elisabetta Ciuccarelli, Programme Officer of the Arab
    [Show full text]
  • Pour Accéder Au Rapport
    2009 INSTITUT DU BOSPHORE 2019 RAPPORT D’ACTIVITE ACTIVITY REPORT SOMMAIRE INDEX Institut du Bosphore en bref 2 Institut du Bosphore in brief Mot du Président 3 From the President Membres du Conseil d’administration & 4 Board of Directors & Founding members Membres fondateurs Comite Scientifique : pilier principal de l’Institut 6 Scientific Committee: Main pillar of the Institute Séminaire Annuel : événement phare de l‘Institut 13 Annual Seminar: Flagship event of the Institute Réseau d’Entreprises de l’Institut du Bosphore 17 Business Network meetings Cercle de l’Institut du Bosphore 18 Cercle de l’Institut meetings Prix Sciences Po - Bosphore 20 Sciences Po - Bosphorus Prize Collaboration avec des think tanks 22 Collaboration with think tanks Institut du Bosphore: un acteur incontournable dans 26 Institut du Bosphore: A key player les relations franco-turques in French-Turkish Relations Dans les médias 29 In the media Publications 30 Publications 1 L’INSTITUT DU BOSPHORE EN BREF INSTITUT DU BOSPHORE IN BRIEF Créé en 2009 à Paris, l’Institut du Bosphore est une Institut du Bosphore is an independent French association française de loi 1901 qui a pour mission association, established in Paris in 2009 under the principale d’être un des moteurs actifs des débats Act 1901, whose main mission is to be one of the sur la Turquie en France, notamment au travers driving forces behind the discussions on Turkey in l’organisation d’événements de premier plan. France, particularly through the organization of outstanding events. Conçu comme un espace
    [Show full text]