(Mhp), 1965-2015: from Alparslan Türkeş to Devlet Bahçeli

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Mhp), 1965-2015: from Alparslan Türkeş to Devlet Bahçeli ARZU OPÇİN KIDAL CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NATIONALIST ACTION PARTY CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN THE CHANGE IDEOLOGY OF AND CONTINUITY THE NATIONALIST ACTION PARTY (MHP), 1965 (MHP), 1965-2015: FROM ALPARSLAN TÜRKEŞ TO DEVLET BAHÇELİ A Ph.D. Dissertation by ARZU OPÇİN KIDAL - 2015: FROM ALPARSLAN TÜRKEŞ TO DEVLET BAHÇELİ Department of Political Science and Public Administration İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara October 2020 Bilkent University 2020 CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NATIONALIST ACTION PARTY (MHP), 1965-2015: FROM ALPARSLAN TÜRKEŞ TO DEVLET BAHÇELİ The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University by ARZU OPÇİN KIDAL In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN Political Science THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION İHSAN DOĞRAMACI BİLKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA October 2020 ABSTRACT CONTINUITY AND CHANGE IN THE IDEOLOGY OF THE NATIONALIST ACTION PARTY (MHP), 1965- 2015: FROM ALPARSLAN TÜRKEŞ TO DEVLET BAHÇELİ Opçin Kıdal, Arzu Ph. D., Department of Political Science and Public Adm. Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Metin Heper October 2020 This Ph.D. dissertation offers an in-depth, systematic study of the continuities and discontinuities from 1965 to 2015 between the nationalist ideas and practices of Alparslan Türkeş (the founder and first leader of Turkey’s Nationalist Action Party [Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi, MHP]) and Devlet Bahçeli (the second and current leader). To this end, this study focuses on (i) general theories of nationalism; (ii) the historical development of Turkish nationalism from the late Ottoman Empire until 2015; and (iii) whether there are discernable differences between the nationalist ideas and practices of Türkeş and Bahçeli, and, if so, how and why such differences emerged. There appears to be no far-reaching comparative analysis of the nationalist ideas and practices of these two leaders in the academic literature, so this dissertation, using a comparative and historical methodology, provides the first systematic analysis of this topic within the relevant structural context. The dissertation argues that while the iii two leaders’ nationalist ideas and practices show continuity in terms of the party’s foundational claims, their ideologies have evolved as each leader has varied his emphasis on the ethnic, cultural, and civic components of Turkish nationalism. These changes parallel the party’s tactical needs in response to the perceived threats arising from specific historical contexts. The findings of this Ph.D. dissertation contribute evidence that theories and arguments based on types of nationalism have little empirical traction, at least in the Turkish case. Keywords: Alparslan Türkeş, Devlet Bahçeli, Nationalism, The Nationalist Action Party, Turkish Nationalism iv ÖZET MİLLİYETÇİ HAREKET PARTİSİ İDEOLOJİSİNDE SÜREKLİLİK VE DEĞİŞİM, 1965-2015: ALPARSLAN TÜRKEŞ’TEN DEVLET BAHÇELİ’YE Opçin Kıdal, Arzu Doktora, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Tez Danışmanı: Prof. Dr. Metin Heper Ekim 2020 Bu doktora tezi, 1965'ten 2015'a kadar Alparslan Türkeş (Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi'nin kurucu lideri) ile Devlet Bahçeli’nin (ikinci ve şimdiki lider) milliyetçi fikir ve uygulamaları arasındaki süreklilik ve süreksizliklerin derinlemesine sistematik bir çalışmasını sunmaktadır. Bu amaçla, bu çalışma (i) genel milliyetçilik teorileri, (ii) Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nun son döneminden 2015’e kadar Türk milliyetçiliğinin tarihsel gelişimine odaklanacak ve (iii) Türkeş ve Bahçeli’nin milliyetçi söylem ve pratiklerinde ayırt edilebilir farklılıkların olup olmadığını ve eğer varsa, bu farklılıkların nasıl ve neden ortaya çıktığını soracaktır. Akademik literatürde bu iki liderin milliyetçi fikirleri ve uygulamalarının kapsamlı bir karşılaştırmalı analizi yoktur, bu nedenle karşılaştırmalı ve tarihsel bir metodoloji kullanan bu tez, konunun ilgili yapısal bağlam içinde ilk sistematik analizini sağlamaktadır. Bu doktora tezi, iki liderin milliyetçi fikir ve pratiklerinin, bir yandan, partinin temel iddiaları açısından süreklilik gösterdiğini, diğer yandan, söz konusu tarihsel bağlamın v algılanan tehditlerine karşılık gelen partinin taktiksel ihtiyaçları doğrultusunda Türk milliyetçiliğinin etnik, kültürel ve sivil bileşenlerine değişen derecelerde vurgu yaparak evrildiğini savunmaktadır. Bu doktora tezinin bulguları, en azından Türkiye örneğinde, milliyetçilik türlerine dayanan teorilerin ve argümanların çok fazla ampirik desteğe sahip olmadığına dair kanıtlara katkıda bulunmaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Alparslan Türkeş, Devlet Bahçeli, Milliyetçilik, Milliyetçi Hareket Partisi, Türk Milliyetçiliği vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The journey of my Ph.D. dissertation started when I said to my dear supervisor Prof. Dr. Metin Heper, “Professor, I am very curious about how it is like to be an idealist (idealist olmak in Turkish).” He answered with confidence as usual: "This is a very broad question Arzu, perhaps even you may not be able to find it in a lifetime, let's narrow it down and examine it through an empirical example, like the ones who consider themselves idealists such as ülkücüler (idealists) in Turkey.” And I lost myself in this subject quite pleasantly for a long time. I would not have been able to complete this project or even to begin it, without the help of many people over the years. While I am surely leaving someone out, I am grateful to all. In writing this Ph.D. dissertation I, therefore, incurred many debts and I am very content to acknowledge them in this part. My greatest debt is to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Metin Heper, one of the doyens (duayen in Turkish) of political science, for his generosity in providing detailed feedbacks to this Ph.D. thesis. His faith in me, wisdom, and forbearance allowed me to surmount all the obstacles that stood in the way. This Ph.D. would not have been finalized without his guidance and supervision. I am deeply grateful to Assistant Professor Dr. Berrak Burçak Della Fave for kindly accepting being part of my thesis monitoring committee. Dr. Burçak Della Fave always vii supported, encouraged, and motivated me heartily. Her constructive criticisms and recommendations developed my thesis a lot. I am deeply grateful to Professor Dr. Tanel Demirel for his kind acceptance of being another member of my thesis monitoring committee and for his generosity in providing books for my research. Dr. Demirel enlarged my horizon in all phases while I was drafting my thesis. I am again deeply grateful to Associate Professor Dr. Ioannis N. Grigoriadis for his strong support during the final phase of my studies by kindly accepting to be a member of my Ph.D. Viva. Yet, more than that, I am grateful to him for his patience, academic support, instructive feedback, and giving wise pieces of advice while we were writing an article together by which I met the Ph.D. requirement of publication. I admire his working discipline and style. My debt to Associate Professor Dr. E. Attila Aytekin is deeply profound. I am deeply grateful to him for kindly accepting to be a member of my Ph.D. Viva and reading every single page of my dissertation. Yet, more than that, I am grateful to him for his faith in me, his generosity in providing insights and wisdom, endless support, and standing by me even under the dark clouds. My debt to my ex- supervisor, Professor Emeritus Ahmet Evin, is especially profound. I always felt his love, support, and faith in me, even in my hardest times, and that always gave me strength. My dear Ahmet Hocam gave me wisdom that brought me closer to whom I wanted to be! That is exactly why he will always have a huge place in my heart. The background hero was Assistant Professor Dr. Meral Uğur Çınar. I am grateful to her for answering any of my questions and giving wise pieces of advice. I am also deeply grateful to Associate Professor Dr. Saime Özçürümez for her support while I was taking her class. Not only our class discussions, but her support to write viii an article as a requirement for her class contributed to my research a lot. I am also grateful to Prof. Dr. Pınar Bilgin for her wise pieces of advice before I started my research. I am also grateful to Associate Professor Dr. İlker Aytürk for suggesting books and ideas for my thesis. I owe a special thanks to Yasin Nasirov, Associate Professor Dr. Devrim Sezer, Prof. Dr. Filiz Başkan, Prof. Dr. Aylin Güney Gevrek, Dr. Neophytos G. Loizides, Associate Professor Dr. Maria Hadjipavlou, Prof. Dr. Irada Bagırova, and Dr. Alp Eren Topal for their academic and personal support during my master and Ph.D. studies. I am also indebted to the many friends and colleagues for their wonderful accompany before and during my Ph.D. studies. My old as well as never-ending friendships have contributed greatly to this journey of thought. I am grateful to my dear old friend Buğra Kara for his faith in me and his unconditional love. He has always been my sheep! Special thanks to Ege Atalay, my deskmate in the primary school, my little fish playing the cello, who is still very close to my life and my imaginative world. I owe a special thanks to dear Müge Gülmez for providing unending encouragement when I wanted to start an academic career and her belief in me. My dearest friends Emre Irmak and Ahmet Samet Tekoğlu have always been with me even in my hardest times, and I am grateful to them for their faith in me, friendship, and love. I cannot thank my dear friend Kamil Majeed enough who enlightened my path in every confusion I had during my Ph.D. and blessed me with his love. I am grateful to my dear friend Nicolo Mavero who has always been there for me whenever I need him, blessing me with his pure love. I am grateful to my dear baby, Stella Divljan for her unconditional love, support, and encouragement for an ix academic career. I owe a special thanks to my dear friend Fahad Sohrab who has always made me laugh, given wise academic advice, and loved me heartily.
Recommended publications
  • Turkish Language As a Politicized Element: the Case of Turkish Nation-Building
    GeT MA Working Paper Series No. 15 2018 Turkish Language as a Politicized Element: The Case of Turkish Nation-Building TOLGA SEVIN GeT MA Working Paper Series Department of Social Sciences Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin www.sowi.hu-berlin.de/getma [email protected] TOLGA SEVIN GET MA WP 15/2018 GeT MA Working Paper Series Published by the German Turkish Masters Program of Social Sciences (GeT MA), Department of Social Sciences at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Papers in this series are the final theses of GeT MA graduates. Publication in this series does not preclude a later publication elsewhere. The views expressed in the GeT MA Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the GeT MA Program or of Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. The copyright stays with the author(s). Copyright for this paper: Tolga Sevin Please cite in the following format: Sevin, Tolga (2018): Turkish Language as a Politicized Element: The Case of Turkish Nation-Building. GeT MA Working Paper No. 15, Department of Social Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. [online] Homepage: Edoc Server Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. URL: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/getmaseries Corresponding authors: Tolga Sevin, Master of Social Science, German Turkish Masters Program, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099 Berlin. Tolga Sevin, born in Ankara, studied at Bilkent University, Middle East Technical University, and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin. He lives in Berlin. This thesis is dedicated to Müfit Kulen.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish German Muslims and Comedy Entertainment CURRENT ISSUES in ISLAM
    Turkish German Muslims and Comedy Entertainment CURRENT ISSUES IN ISLAM Editiorial Board Baderin, Mashood, SOAS, University of London Fadil, Nadia, KU Leuven Goddeeris, Idesbald, KU Leuven Hashemi, Nader, University of Denver Leman, Johan, GCIS, emeritus, KU Leuven Nicaise, Ides, KU Leuven Pang, Ching Lin, University of Antwerp and KU Leuven Platti, Emilio, emeritus, KU Leuven Tayob, Abdulkader, University of Cape Town Stallaert, Christiane, University of Antwerp and KU Leuven Toğuşlu, Erkan, GCIS, KU Leuven Zemni, Sami, Universiteit Gent Turkish German Muslims and Comedy Entertainment Settling into Mainstream Culture in the 21st Century Benjamin Nickl Leuven University Press Published with the support of the Popular Culture Association of Australia and New Zealand University of Sydney and KU Leuven Fund for Fair Open Access Published in 2020 by Leuven University Press / Presses Universitaires de Louvain / Universitaire Pers Leuven. Minderbroedersstraat 4, B-3000 Leuven (Belgium). © Benjamin Nickl, 2020 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivative 4.0 Licence. The licence allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work for personal and non- commercial use providing author and publisher attribution is clearly stated. Attribution should include the following information: B. Nickl. 2019. Turkish German Muslims and Comedy Entertainment: Settling into Mainstream Culture in the 21st Century. Leuven, Leuven University Press. (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Further details about Creative Commons licences
    [Show full text]
  • Turkomans Between Two Empires
    TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ORIGINS OF THE QIZILBASH IDENTITY IN ANATOLIA (1447-1514) A Ph.D. Dissertation by RIZA YILDIRIM Department of History Bilkent University Ankara February 2008 To Sufis of Lāhijan TURKOMANS BETWEEN TWO EMPIRES: THE ORIGINS OF THE QIZILBASH IDENTITY IN ANATOLIA (1447-1514) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by RIZA YILDIRIM In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA February 2008 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Assist. Prof. Oktay Özel Supervisor I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Prof. Dr. Halil Đnalcık Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Prof. Dr. Ahmet Yaşar Ocak Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History. …………………….. Assist. Prof. Evgeni Radushev Examining Committee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History.
    [Show full text]
  • Cn 1478.2001
    (XXVII.7) UNITED NATIONS WiM NATIONS UNIES POSTAL ADDRESS ADRESSE POSTALE UNITED NATIONS. N.Y. 1OOt7 CABLE ADDRESS ADRESSE TEL'EGRAPHIQUE UNATlOHS NEWYORK Reference: C N.1478.2001.TREATIES-2 (Depositary Notification) UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE NEW YORK, 9 MAY 1992 ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE LIST IN ANNEX II TO THE CONVENTION The Secretary-General of the United Nations, acting in his capacity as depositary, communicates the following: On 13 December 2001, the Executive Secretary of the Climate Change Secretariat notified the Secretary-General that, at the seventh session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, held in Marrakesh, Morocco, from 26 October to 10 November 2001, the Parties adopted on 9 November 2001 the Amendment to the list in Annex II to the Convention (Decision 26/CP.7), in accordance with article 16, paragraph 4 of the Convention. A copy of the authentic text of the Amendment in the Arabic, Chinese, English, French, Russian and Spanish languages is attached (hard copy format only). Pursuant to article 16 (4) of the Convention, "the [...] entry into force of amendments to annexes to the Convention shall be subject to the same procedure as that for the [...] entry into force of annexes to the Convention in accordance with its paragraphs 2 and 3." In accordance with the procedure set forth in article 16 (3) of the Convention, the Amendment to the list in Annex II to the Convention, shall enter into force for all Parties to the Convention six months after the date of the communication by the Depositary to such Parties of the adoption of the Amendment, except for those Parties that have notified the Depositary, in writing, within that period of their non-ace ;ptance of the Amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Lewis 1749.Indd
    GEOFFREY LEWIS Geoffrey Lewis Lewis 1920–2008 I. Life PROFESSOR GEOFFREY LEWIS LEWIS, a pioneer in Turkish Studies in Britain and an internationally admired scholar in the fi eld, was born in London on 19 June 1920. He received his schooling at University College School in Hampstead, following which, in 1938, he went up to St John’s College Oxford to read Classics. Having sat Honour Moderations in the spring of 1940, he joined the Royal Air Force in September of that year and served until 1945: he qualifi ed for his BA by War Decree and subsequently received his MA in 1945. At some point during his study for Honour Mods, his Latin tutor, sensing that he was getting stale, suggested that he take up Turkish as a hobby—it seems that the choice of Turkish came to him on the spur of the moment. Geoffrey took it seriously, however, and the opportunity to act on it came when he was posted to Egypt as a radar operator. He made contact with an elderly Turk in Alexandria, through whom, and through the painstaking comparison of classic English texts with their Turkish translations—these culled from the bookshops of London and sent to him by his wife, Raphaela, whom he had married in 1941—he taught him- self Turkish. Returning to Oxford in 1945, and by now wholly won over to Turkish, he consulted the Laudian Professor of Arabic, [Sir] Hamilton Gibb, FBA, who welcomed the prospect of expanding the curriculum in Oriental Studies to include Turkish but recommended that Geoffrey read for the BA in Arabic and Persian as essential background to the serious study of Turkish historically as well as in its modern form.
    [Show full text]
  • Relations with Conventions Recommended Council Decision
    Global Environment Facility GEF/C.10/7 October 3, 1997 GEF Council November 4-6, 1997 Agenda Item 10 RELATIONS WITH CONVENTIONS RECOMMENDED COUNCIL DECISION The Council, having reviewed document GEF/C.10/7, Relations with Conventions, welcomes the collaboration between the GEF and Conventions secretariats, and encourages the GEF secretariat and Implementing Agencies to continue their efforts towards active dialogue with the Parties to the Conventions at the appropriate convention meetings. The Council takes note of the initiatives of the Secretariat and Implementing Agencies to respond to the additional guidance received from the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity and requests them to continue their efforts to develop project activities consistent with such guidance. The Council also takes note of the reviews being undertaken by the Conventions of their financial mechanisms, and invites all GEF Participant states, in their capacity as Parties to the Conventions, to contribute to the review process. INTRODUCTION 1. This document reports on developments of concern to the GEF within the context of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change that have occurred since the GEF Council meeting in April 1997. CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY Third meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice 2. The third meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA) was held on September 1 to 5, 1997. The main agenda item for the meeting was the assessment of the status and trends of the biological diversity of inland water ecosystems and identification of options for conservation and sustainable use.
    [Show full text]
  • 52927457.Pdf
    THE CULTURAL POLICIES OF THE TURKISH REPUBLIC DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NATION STATE (1923- 1938) The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by iPEK KAMACI Io Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Degree Of MASTER OF ARTS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION in THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION BILKENT UNIVERSITY ANKARA February,2000 The.sis bf )30 , K.3' .2t;oo .E,c50.c;\O I certify that l have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a th~sis for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science and Public Administrati n. Assistant Professor Orhan Tekelioglu l certify that l have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science and Public Administration. I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science and Public Administration. Dr.Me Approval of the Institute of Economics and Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Ali Karaosmanoglu ABSTRACT THE CULTURAL POLICIES OF THE TURKISH REPUBLIC DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NATION STA TE (1923 - 1938) ipek KAMACI Department of Political Science and Public Administration Supervisor: Asst. Prof Orhan TEKEUOGLU February, 2000 This study aims to analyse the understanding of cultural politics during the establishment period of Turkish Republic. It is argued that this understanding of culturai politics is ideologically shaped by Kemalism that maintains Ziya Gokalp's separation of culture and civilization.
    [Show full text]
  • Köksal, Özlem. "Memory, Identity: the Turkish Context." Aesthetics of Displacement: Turkey and Its Minorities on Screen
    Köksal, Özlem. "Memory, Identity: The Turkish Context." Aesthetics of Displacement: Turkey and its Minorities on Screen. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. 1–24. Topics and Issues in National Cinema. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 26 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781501306471.ch-001>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 26 September 2021, 08:14 UTC. Copyright © Özlem Köksal 2016. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 1 Memory, Identity: The Turkish Context During the 1980s and 1990s, Turkey witnessed major social, economic, and cultural changes. The neo-liberal policies introduced after the 1980s, within a framework of a rapidly globalizing world, inevitably caused profound changes in the country. On the one hand, the process of joining the European Union (EU), and the constitutional changes required by the process known as the Copenhagen Criteria, brought more freedom of speech to the country, compared to the restricted civil liberties during the military regime of the early 1980s. This process, according to Ayşe Kadıoğlu, introduced “some of the most important parliamentary reforms toward the acknowledgment of different religious and ethnic identities in Turkey” (Kadıoğlu 2007: 292).1 On the other hand, the neo-liberal economic transformation resulted, much like everywhere else in the world, in an uneven distribution of wealth, making the gap between rich and poor wider. The process of globalization, and the rapid change in economic and social life, arguably created a rupture in the belief in the promise of the future, and resulted in people enquiring about the past in order to redefine their relationship, not just to the past, but also to the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Farkli Çiğirlar, Kurumlar Ve Bir Tarih Alimi Zeki Velidi Togan*
    Turkish Studies International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 10/3 Winter 2015, p. 343-352 DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.8053 ISSN: 1308-2140, ANKARA-TURKEY RESMÎ TARİH TEZİNE “TÜRK TARİH TEZİNE” FARKLI ÇIĞIRLAR, KURUMLAR VE BİR TARİH ALİMİ ZEKİ VELİDİ TOGAN* Fatih Mehmet DERVİŞOĞLU** ÖZET Türk Tarih Tezi’nin Mustafa Kemal Paşa önderliğinde tartışıldığı dönemde, tarih yazıcılığına hakim tek paradigma değildi. Akademik tarihçilik, resmî tarih teziyle eş zamanlı olarak gelişimini sürdürmeye devam etmiştir. Resmî tarih tezinin, milliyetçilik düşüncesi esas olmak üzere pozitivizm ve laiklik temelinde geliştirdiği tezler, Osmanlı geçmişini bir yana bırakıp Türklerin Orta Asya kökenine dikkatleri çekmişti. Bu tavır, Türk tarihinin en eski geçmişini konu edinen yeni araştırma alanlarına sevk ederek tarihin araştırma alanlarını genişletmesiyle Türk tarih yazıcılığına katkı sağlamıştı. Türklerin İslâm öncesi geçmişini yücelterek, İslâm Osmanlı geçmişini hatırlatan bütün sembolleri ortadan kaldırmaya yönelik tarih ve dil tezlerine çekimser ama ihtiyatlı itirazın sahibi Köprülü, I. Tarih Kongresi haricinde bir daha tezle ilgili konuşmamasına rağmen itirazını resmî tezin hilafına ortaya koyduğu Türk tarihinin kültürel bütünlüğünü sağlayan eserleriyle ifade eder. Resmî tarih tezi, Millî Eğitim Vekâleti vasıtasıyla ortaöğretimde, tarih ders kitapları ve öğretmenler üzerinde ideolojik bir hâkimiyet kurarken, Türk Tarihi Tetkik Cemiyeti yükseköğrenim kurumlarında ve araştırma Enstitülerinde yeterli kontrol mekanizmasına sahip değildir. Cemiyet, Köprülü’nün denetimindeki Türkiyât Enstitüsü‘nün çalışmalarına müdahil olmamıştır. Dış Türklerden oluşan Tatar, Azeri ilim adamları, Köprülü’nün gayretleriyle ilmî kariyer sahibi oldular. Enstitü’nün dergisi “Türkiyât Mecmuası“ında yerlerini aldılar. Zeki Velidi Toğan bu ilim adamları arasında temayüz edenlerdendi. Türkiyât Enstitüsü müdürü Fuad Köprülü, 26 Şubat 6 Mart 1926 tarihlerinde Bakü’de toplanan Türkiyât Kongresine katılır.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    RECENT PUBLICATIONS ON SYRIAC TOPICS: 2018* SEBASTIAN P. BROCK, UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD GRIGORY KESSEL, AUSTRIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER SERGEY MINOV, UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD Books Acharya, F., Psalmic Odes from Apostolic Times: An Indian Monk’s Meditation (Bengaluru: ATC Publishers, 2018). Adelman, S., After Saturday Comes Sunday (Piscataway, New Jersey: Gorgias Press, 2018). Alobaidi, T., and Dweik, B., Language Contact and the Syriac Language of the Assyrians in Iraq (Saarbrücken, Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing, 2018). Andrade, N.J., The Journey of Christianity to India in Late Antiquity: Networks and the Movement of Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018). Aravackal, R., The Mystery of the Triple Gradated Church: A Theological Analysis of the Kṯāḇā d-Massqāṯā (Book of Steps) with Particular Reference to the Writing of Aphrahat and John the Solitary (Oriental Institute of Religious Studies India Publications 437; Kottayam, India: Oriental Institute of Religious Studies, 2018). Aydin, G. (ed.), Syriac Hymnal According to the Rite of the Syriac Orthodox Church of Antioch (Teaneck, New Jersey: Beth Antioch Press / Syriac Music Institute, 2018). Bacall, J., Chaldean Iraqi American Association of Michigan (Charleston, South Carolina: Arcadia Publishing, 2018). * The list of publications is based on the online Comprehensive Bibliography on Syriac Christianity, supported by the Center for the Study of Christianity at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (http://www.csc.org.il/db/db.aspx?db=SB). Suggested additions and corrections can be sent to: [email protected] 235 236 Bibliographies Barry, S.C., Syriac Medicine and Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq’s Arabic Translation of the Hippocratic Aphorisms (Journal of Semitic Studies Supplement 39; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Foreword Introduction: Ł'orient N'existe
    Notes Foreword 1. John Jay Chapman, Practical Agitation, New York: Charles Scribner & Sons 1900, pp. 63–64. 2. See Walter Lippman, Public Opinion, Charleston: BiblioLife 2008. 3. When, in the Summer of 2013, Western European states grounded Evo Morales’ presidential plane on which he was returning from Moscow to Bolivia, suspecting that Edward Snowden was hidden in it on his way to the Bolivian exile, the most humiliating aspect was the Europeans’ attempt to retain their dignity: instead of openly admitting that they were acting under US pressure, or pretending that they were simply following the law, they jus- tified the grounding on pure technicalities, claiming that the flight was not properly registered in their air traffic control. The effect was miserable—the Europeans not only appeared as US servants, they even wanted to cover up their servitude with ridiculous technicalities. Introduction: Ł’Orient n’existe pas 1. The direct result of the 2002 Patriot Act was the 779 detainees in Guantanamo, most of them Muslim and many of them non-combatants, without any access to counsel or habeas corpus, against all international conventions (Chossudovsky 2004). Some of these people allegedly committed sui- cide. Despite President Obama’s promises during both his campaigns, the Guantanamo Camp is still open and functioning. 2. It is not a mere coincidence that Herbert’s Dune (1965) became, almost 50 years later, a perfect, prophetic and almost allegorical metaphor for the Orient subverting the existence of the ‘Empire’, another Lacanian letter eventually arriving at its destination. 3. The same process in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand, although similar in certain respects, is outside the scope of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Turanism, an Aspect of Turkish Nationalism 23 Did, Turkic Ethnicism in Contrast to the Theocratic Interracialism of the Community of the Faithful Jümmetj
    T U R A N I S M AN ASPECT OF TURKISH NATIONALISM In the last two decades of the nineteenth century, as is generally known, the Ottoman Empire drifted away from the British orbit and came increasingly under the influence of Germany. It was the time when the British Foreign Office, after half a century of adhering to the principle of the integrity of the Ottoman Empire as a barrier to Russian expansionism, began to tolerate, or even support, the nationalist movement of the Balkan peoples and their claims against Turkey. At the beginning of Gladstone’s administration, in 1880, Montenegro, thanks to British as well as to Rus­ sian favor, acquired an outlet at Dulcigno (Ulcinj);1 a year later Abd-ul- Hamid II was compelled to cede Thessaly to Greece;2 on several occasions thereafter London registered an interest in behalf of the Cretans and the Armenians and reminded the sultan of his obligation to introduce reforms according to Articles 23 and 61 of the Berlin Treaty.3 No less important in Turkish eyes were Great Britain’s attempts to carve off Ottoman territories or to establish a foothold in the periphery of the declining empire. The retention of Cyprus by the British and the occupation of Egypt, the former in tune with Greek aspirations,4 5the latter in overt opposition to Egyptian nationalism,6 were equally severe blows to 1. See William L. Langer, European Alliances and Alignments, 1871 -1890 (New York, 1939), pp. 203-206. 2. Ibid., p. 209. William Miller, The Ottoman Empire and Its Successors (Cambridge University Press, 1936), pp.
    [Show full text]