Grand Âge, Le Temps D 'Agir

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Grand Âge, Le Temps D 'Agir CONCERTATION Grand âge et autonomie Dominique Libault Mars 2019 Grand âge, le temps d ’agir © Romain Bourguinon CONCERTATION Grand âge et autonomie SOMMAIRE INTRODUCTION UNE CONCERTATION NATIONALE DE GRANDE AMPLEUR QUI SONT LES PERSONNES ÂGEES EN PERTE D’AUTONOMIE ? COMMENT LES DÉPENSES SONT-ELLES PRISES EN CHARGE ? SYNTHÈSE PARTIE 1 – CONSTATS ET ENJEUX 21 1 - Une demande forte de transformation en profondeur 22 une priorité affirmée au maintien à domicile une attente forte d’amélioration de la qualité de la prise en charge en établissement le besoin d’« être chez soi », quel que soit son lieu de vie une demande de simplification du parcours de la personne âgée l’attente d’une plus grande égalité de traitement entre les territoires 2 - Un système complexe et peu lisible, en dépit d’un effort public croissant et de nombreuses initiatives innovantes 26 un effort en hausse constante depuis le début des années 2000 de nombreuses initiatives témoignant de la capacité d’innovation du secteur une offre en établissement comme à domicile, segmentée et fragile sur le plan économique des prestations peu lisibles des réponses professionnelles trop cloisonnées et peu coordonnées un pilotage local particulièrement complexe un débat parlementaire peu organisé une connaissance statistique et une recherche insuffisamment développées 3 - Un investissement fort et urgent dans l’attractivité des métiers et les compétences 39 un emploi en croissance forte depuis une décennie une pénurie de personnel aggravée par de fortes difficultés de recrutement dans la décennie à venir un temps professionnel auprès de la personne âgée insuffisant 1 CONCERTATION Grand âge et autonomie des tensions sur les effectifs aggravées par la dégradation des conditions de travail un manque d’attractivité lié aux insuffisances de la formation et des perspectives de carrière 4 - L’attente d’une meilleure prise en compte des ressources dans l’attribution des aides et le choix d’une couverture publique 47 un reste à charge maîtrisé à domicile mais élevé en établissement un attachement à la modulation de l’aide financière selon les revenus malgré des disparités, un niveau de vie relatif des plus de 65 ans le plus élevé de l’OCDE les français privilégient une couverture publique du risque 5 - Un manque de coordination autour de la personne source de ruptures de parcours, de défaut de prévention et d’isolement 51 la prévention, enjeu mal reconnu et peu soutenu des interventions insuffisamment pensées dans une logique de continuité des parcours un appui aux proches aidants insatisfaisant des solidarités du quotidien et un cadre de vie ne parvenant pas à rompre l’isolement PARTIE 2 - LES PROPOSITIONS POUR CHANGER DE MODÈLE 61 1. Un nouveau regard sur le grand âge 62 a. Donner du sens au grand âge en réaffirmant la citoyenneté, la dignité et le droit au libre choix de la personne âgée 62 Objectif : Sensibiliser pour inclure la personne âgée dans la vie de la cité Objectif : Renforcer l’intégration de la politique du grand âge et des politiques du cadre de vie de la personne âgée Objectif : Faciliter l’accès des personnes âgées à des solutions innovantes de mobilité, d’adaptation du logement et d’amélioration du quotidien Objectif : Affirmer en tout lieu la dignité de la personne âgée en prévenant la maltraitance b. Aider les proches aidants et lutter contre l’isolement de la personne âgée : pour un modèle d’accompagnement et de soin intégré associant démarches citoyennes et démarches professionnelles pour et avec les personnes 69 Objectif : Simplifier la vie des proches aidants, faciliter leurs démarches et rendre leurs droits plus effectifs Objectif : Améliorer l’accompagnement financier des proches aidants Objectif : Mieux concilier le rôle de proche aidant et la vie professionnelle 2 CONCERTATION Grand âge et autonomie Objectif : Innover sur les territoires en faveur des proches aidants Objectif : Lutter contre l’isolement de la personne âgée en mobilisant les bénévoles de tous les âges 2. L’autonomie de la personne âgée au cœur de la stratégie 74 a. Garantir le libre choix de la personne âgée en construisant une nouvelle offre d’accompagnement et de soin recentrée sur le domicile 74 Objectif : Assurer la viabilité, l’attractivité et la qualité de l’accompagnement et des soins à domicile Objectif : Développer des modes d’habitats intermédiaires pour les personnes âgées plus autonomes Objectif : Décloisonner les structures pour améliorer la qualité de service et réaliser des gains d’efficience Objectif : Piloter par la qualité Objectif : Rééquilibrer l’offre sur le territoire Objectif : Changer le regard sur les structures pour personnes âgées et valoriser les bonnes pratiques Objectif : Mettre la personne âgée au cœur de l’accompagnement et partir de ses attentes, dans une logique de « chez soi » b. Prévenir la perte d’autonomie pour augmenter l’espérance de vie sans incapacité 86 Objectif : Matérialiser une forte ambition en matière de prévention de la perte d’autonomie en fixant un objectif ambitieux d’augmentation de l’espérance de vie sans incapacité Objectif : Proposer une nouvelle offre de prévention et sensibiliser le grand public Objectif : Former massivement les intervenants professionnels auprès des personnes âgées aux réflexes de prévention de la perte d’autonomie Objectif : Diffuser les démarches de prévention dans l’ensemble des structures de prise en charge de la personne âgée Objectif : Renforcer le pilotage et l’évaluation de la politique de prévention de la perte d’autonomie 3. Améliorer les conditions de vie de la personne âgée par la revalorisation des métiers, à travers un plan national pour les métiers du grand âge 93 Objectif : Accroître le temps de présence humaine en proximité de la personne Objectif : Améliorer les conditions de travail des professionnels et la qualité de l’accompagnement des personnes par l’innovation organisationnelle Objectif : Avancer vers des hausses de rémunération ciblées pour les métiers du grand âge, en particulier à domicile Objectif : Engager une montée en compétence de l’ensemble des professionnels du grand âge dans une perspective d’amélioration de la justesse relationnelle de l’intervention Objectif : Ouvrir des perspectives de carrière pour les métiers du grand âge, faciliter les reconversions professionnelles et mobiliser des compétences variées auprès des personnes âgées Objectif : Piloter une politique transversale de valorisation des métiers du grand âge 3 CONCERTATION Grand âge et autonomie 4. Mieux accompagner 105 a. Rénover les prestations pour simplifier la vie des personnes âgées et agir sur l’accessibilité financière, garantie du libre choix 105 Objectif : Simplifier la vie des personnes âgées et des proches aidants et faciliter leurs démarches Objectif : Rénover les prestations à domicile et mieux les articuler avec celles qui relèvent du handicap pour assurer l’effectivité des droits Objectif : Matérialiser l’affirmation de la perte d’autonomie des personnes âgées comme risque de protection sociale en simplifiant le pilotage des établissements, en assumant la part du financement national et en socialisant le risque long de perte d’autonomie lourde en établissement Objectif : Mieux prendre en compte la capacité des personnes à assumer financièrement leur perte d’autonomie dans un triple objectif d’équité intergénérationnelle, intragénérationnelle et territoriale Objectif : Recentrer les dispositifs d’exonération de cotisations sociales ou de crédit d’impôt sur les publics fragiles. b. Assurer une continuité de prise en charge pour chacun et mettre un terme aux réponses en silos 115 Objectif : Eviter toute rupture de parcours pour les personnes âgées et engager l’ensemble des acteurs sanitaires, sociaux et médico-sociaux dans un décloisonnement de leurs interventions Objectif : Prévenir les hospitalisations et les passages aux urgences évitables Objectif : Organiser le séjour de la personne âgée en établissement de santé de manière à éviter les ruptures de parcours Objectif : Promouvoir un établissement de santé bienveillant pour la personne âgée 5. Un risque national à part entière avec un partenariat territorial renouvelé 123 a. Reconnaître la perte d’autonomie comme un risque de protection sociale à part entière 123 b. Améliorer les connaissances statistiques et économiques et soutenir la recherche pour étayer la politique du grand âge 127 Objectif : Faciliter les remontées d’informations et les traitements statistiques ainsi que l’observation économique pour mieux piloter le risque de protection sociale de perte d’autonomie des personnes âgées Objectif : Accélérer et encourager les travaux de recherche liés au vieillissement afin d’éclairer la prise de décision dans le champ du grand âge c. Accroître l’effort financier en assurant un financement juste de la perte d’autonomie liée a l’âge par la solidarité nationale 130 Objectif : Affecter des ressources publiques au financement de la perte d’autonomie de la personne âgée, sans hausse de prélèvement obligatoire Objectif : En complément du financement public du nouveau risque de protection sociale, favoriser la mobilisation des patrimoines financiers et immobiliers 4 CONCERTATION Grand âge et autonomie d. Piloter l’offre sur les territoires, au plus près des personnes, tout en garantissant mieux des réponses homogènes et équitables 136 Objectif : Repositionner le Conseil départemental en proximité de la personne âgée et renforcer la conduite partenariale de la politique du grand âge au niveau départemental Objectif : Simplifier le pilotage de l’offre médico-sociale Objectif : Renforcer les compétences de la CNSA, notamment en matière de pilotage financier et de garanties d’équité entre les territoires Objectif : Evaluer la réforme, notamment sur les aspects de gouvernance et de pilotage CONCLUSION 144 LISTE DES PROPOSITIONS 145 ANNEXES 155 1. Lettre de mission de Dominique Libault 2. Les attentes exprimées par les Français 3. Recommandations du Comité scientifique 4. Enjeux financiers relatifs aux propositions 5. Grand âge et plaisir de la table 6. L’organisation de la concertation 7. La concertation dans les territoires : 500 personnes réunies lors des forums régionaux 8. Les personnes âgées et leur prise en charge 9. L’expérience allemande 10.
Recommended publications
  • Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe
    This page intentionally left blank Populist radical right parties in Europe As Europe enters a significant phase of re-integration of East and West, it faces an increasing problem with the rise of far-right political par- ties. Cas Mudde offers the first comprehensive and truly pan-European study of populist radical right parties in Europe. He focuses on the par- ties themselves, discussing them both as dependent and independent variables. Based upon a wealth of primary and secondary literature, this book offers critical and original insights into three major aspects of European populist radical right parties: concepts and classifications; themes and issues; and explanations for electoral failures and successes. It concludes with a discussion of the impact of radical right parties on European democracies, and vice versa, and offers suggestions for future research. cas mudde is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Political Science at the University of Antwerp. He is the author of The Ideology of the Extreme Right (2000) and the editor of Racist Extremism in Central and Eastern Europe (2005). Populist radical right parties in Europe Cas Mudde University of Antwerp CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521850810 © Cas Mudde 2007 This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provision of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 European Elections the Weight of the Electorates Compared to the Electoral Weight of the Parliamentary Groups
    2019 European Elections The weight of the electorates compared to the electoral weight of the parliamentary groups Guillemette Lano Raphaël Grelon With the assistance of Victor Delage and Dominique Reynié July 2019 2019 European Elections. The weight of the electorates | Fondation pour l’innovation politique I. DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN THE WEIGHT OF ELECTORATES AND THE ELECTORAL WEIGHT OF PARLIAMENTARY GROUPS The Fondation pour l’innovation politique wished to reflect on the European elections in May 2019 by assessing the weight of electorates across the European constituency independently of the electoral weight represented by the parliamentary groups comprised post-election. For example, we have reconstructed a right-wing Eurosceptic electorate by aggregating the votes in favour of right-wing national lists whose discourses are hostile to the European Union. In this case, for instance, this methodology has led us to assign those who voted for Fidesz not to the European People’s Party (EPP) group but rather to an electorate which we describe as the “populist right and extreme right” in which we also include those who voted for the Italian Lega, the French National Rally, the Austrian FPÖ and the Sweden Democrats. Likewise, Slovak SMER voters were detached from the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (S&D) Group and instead categorised as part of an electorate which we describe as the “populist left and extreme left”. A. The data collected The electoral results were collected list by list, country by country 1, from the websites of the national parliaments and governments of each of the States of the Union. We then aggregated these data at the European level, thus obtaining: – the number of individuals registered on the electoral lists on the date of the elections, or the registered voters; – the number of votes, or the voters; – the number of valid votes in favour of each of the lists, or the votes cast; – the number of invalid votes, or the blank or invalid votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage, Landscape and Conflict Archaeology
    THE EDGE OF EUROPE: HERITAGE, LANDSCAPE AND CONFLICT ARCHAEOLOGY by ROXANA-TALIDA ROMAN A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Classics, Ancient History and Archaeology School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham May 2019 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The research presented in this thesis addresses the significance of Romanian WWI sites as places of remembrance and heritage, by exploring the case of Maramureș against the standards of national and international heritage standards. The work provided the first ever survey of WWI sites on the Eastern Front, showing that the Prislop Pass conflictual landscape holds undeniable national and international heritage value both in terms of physical preservation and in terms of mapping on the memorial-historical record. The war sites demonstrate heritage and remembrance value by meeting heritage criteria on account of their preservation state, rarity, authenticity, research potential, the embedded war knowledge and their historical-memorial functions. The results of the research established that the war sites not only satisfy heritage legal requirements at various scales but are also endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of European and National Election Results Update: September 2019
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2019 A Public Opinion Monitoring Publication REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2019 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit May 2019 - PE 640.149 IMPRESSUM AUTHORS Philipp SCHULMEISTER, Head of Unit (Editor) Alice CHIESA, Marc FRIEDLI, Dimitra TSOULOU MALAKOUDI, Matthias BÜTTNER Special thanks to EP Liaison Offices and Members’ Administration Unit PRODUCTION Katarzyna ONISZK Manuscript completed in September 2019 Brussels, © European Union, 2019 Cover photo: © Andrey Kuzmin, Shutterstock.com ABOUT THE PUBLISHER This paper has been drawn up by the Public Opinion Monitoring Unit within the Directorate–General for Communication (DG COMM) of the European Parliament. To contact the Public Opinion Monitoring Unit please write to: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSION Original: EN DISCLAIMER This document is prepared for, and primarily addressed to, the Members and staff of the European Parliament to assist them in their parliamentary work. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of its author(s) and any opinions expressed herein should not be taken to represent an official position of the Parliament. TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL 1 1. COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 5 DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS OVERVIEW 1979 - 2019 6 COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LAST UPDATE (31/07/2019) 7 CONSTITUTIVE SESSION (02/07/2019) AND OUTGOING EP SINCE 1979 8 PROPORTION OF WOMEN AND MEN PROPORTION - LAST UPDATE 02/07/2019 28 PROPORTIONS IN POLITICAL GROUPS - LAST UPDATE 02/07/2019 29 PROPORTION OF WOMEN IN POLITICAL GROUPS - SINCE 1979 30 2. NUMBER OF NATIONAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT CONSTITUTIVE SESSION 31 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Democratic Information in an Age of Corporate Power
    14 09/2016 N°14 Democratic Information in an Age of Corporate Power Democratic Information in an Age of Corporate Power The Passerelle Collection The Passerelle Collection, realised in the framework of the Coredem initiative (Communauté des sites de ressources documentaires pour une démocratie mondiale– Community of Sites of Documentary Resources for a Global Democracy), aims at presenting current topics through analyses, propos- als and experiences based both on field work and research. Each issue is an attempt to weave together various contribu- tions on a specific issue by civil society organisations, media, trade unions, social movements, citizens, academics, etc. The publication of new issues of Passerelle is often associated to public conferences, «Coredem’s Wednesdays» which pursue a similar objective: creating space for dialogue, sharing and build- ing common ground between the promoters of social change. All issues are available online at: www.coredem.info Coredem, a Collective Initiative Coredem (Community of Sites of Documentary Resources for a Global Democracy) is a space for exchanging knowl- edge and practices by and for actors of social change. More than 30 activist organisations and networks share informa- tion and analysis online by pooling it thanks to the search engine Scrutari. Coredem is open to any organisation, net- work, social movement or media which consider that the experiences, proposals and analysis they set forth are building blocks for fairer, more sustainable and more responsible societies. Ritimo, the Publisher The organisation Ritimo is in charge of Coredem and of publishing the Passerelle Collection. Ritimo is a network for information and documentation on international solidarity and sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members
    Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean Members David Maria SASSOLI Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Italy Partito Democratico Asim ADEMOV Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Bulgaria Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria Alex AGIUS SALIBA Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Malta Partit Laburista François ALFONSI Member Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance France Régions et Peuples Solidaires Malik AZMANI Member Renew Europe Group Netherlands Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en Democratie Nicolas BAY Member Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national Tiziana BEGHIN Member Non-attached Members Italy Movimento 5 Stelle François-Xavier BELLAMY Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) France Les Républicains Sergio BERLATO Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group Italy Fratelli d'Italia Manuel BOMPARD Member The Left group in the European Parliament - GUE/NGL France La France Insoumise 24/09/2021 1 Sylvie BRUNET Member Renew Europe Group France Mouvement Démocrate Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group Spain VOX Catherine CHABAUD Member Renew Europe Group France Mouvement Démocrate Nathalie COLIN-OESTERLÉ Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) France Les centristes Gilbert COLLARD Member Identity and Democracy Group France Rassemblement national
    [Show full text]
  • List of Members
    Committee on International Trade Members Bernd LANGE Chair Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Germany Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands Tokia SAÏFI Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) France Agir - La Droite constructive Yannick JADOT Vice-Chair Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance France Europe Écologie Iuliu WINKLER Vice-Chair Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Romania Uniunea Democrată Maghiară din România Jan ZAHRADIL Vice-Chair European Conservatives and Reformists Group Czechia Občanská demokratická strana Laima Liucija ANDRIKIENĖ Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Lithuania Tėvynės sąjunga-Lietuvos krikščionys demokratai Maria ARENA Member Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament Belgium Parti Socialiste Tiziana BEGHIN Member Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group Italy Movimento 5 Stelle David BORRELLI Member Group of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe Italy Più Europa David CAMPBELL BANNERMAN Member European Conservatives and Reformists Group United Kingdom Conservative Party 28/09/2021 1 Daniel CASPARY Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Germany Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands Salvatore CICU Member Group of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) Italy Forza Italia William (The Earl of) DARTMOUTH Member Europe of Freedom and Direct Democracy Group United
    [Show full text]
  • 50 YEARS of EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY and Subjugated
    European Parliament – 50th birthday QA-70-07-089-EN-C series 1958–2008 Th ere is hardly a political system in the modern world that does not have a parliamentary assembly in its institutional ‘toolkit’. Even autocratic or totalitarian BUILDING PARLIAMENT: systems have found a way of creating the illusion of popular expression, albeit tamed 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY and subjugated. Th e parliamentary institution is not in itself a suffi cient condition for granting a democratic licence. Yet the existence of a parliament is a necessary condition of what 1958–2008 we have defi ned since the English, American and French Revolutions as ‘democracy’. Since the start of European integration, the history of the European Parliament has fallen between these two extremes. Europe was not initially created with democracy in mind. Yet Europe today is realistic only if it espouses the canons of democracy. In other words, political realism in our era means building a new utopia, that of a supranational or post-national democracy, while for two centuries the DNA of democracy has been its realisation within the nation-state. Yves Mény President of the European University Institute, Florence BUILDING PARLIAMENT: BUILDING 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN OF YEARS 50 ISBN 978-92-823-2368-7 European Parliament – 50th birthday series Price in Luxembourg (excluding VAT): EUR 25 BUILDING PARLIAMENT: 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY 1958–2008 This work was produced by the European University Institute, Florence, under the direction of Yves Mény, for the European Parliament. Contributors: Introduction, Jean-Marie Palayret; Part One, Luciano Bardi, Nabli Beligh, Cristina Sio Lopez and Olivier Costa (coordinator); Part Two, Pierre Roca, Ann Rasmussen and Paolo Ponzano (coordinator); Part Three, Florence Benoît-Rohmer; Conclusions, Yves Mény.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean-Luc Mélenchon and France Insoumise: the Manufacturing of Populism
    Jean-Luc Mélenchon and France Insoumise: the manufacturing of populism Philippe Marlière ‘Jean-Luc Mélenchon and France Insoumise: The Manufacturing of Populism’, in Giorgos Katsambekis, Alexandros Kioupkiolis (eds), The Populist Radical Left in Europe, London, Routledge, 2018. ******** Abstract In the run-up to the 2017 presidential election in France, Jean-Luc Mélenchon who, so far, had been associated with the radical left, formed a new movement called France Insoumise (Unbowed France - FI). Mélenchon’s populist strategy in launching FI was blatant. This was an attempt to organise the masses along the lines of an agonistic cleavage between ‘the people’ and ‘the elite’, and this was also a radical break with the collective forms of leadership and action on the French left. The gamble paid off as Mélenchon received significant support from segments of left-wing voters in the first round of the presidential election. In true populist fashion, the FI leader wants to federate ‘the people’, and not simply left-wing voters. He has ceased to use the notion of left altogether. What defines FI’s populism is the role and the centrality of the leader. One may wonder whether populism is the best strategy to broaden the left’s electorate as left-wing and right-wing populisms do not tap in the same culture and do not express the same feelings. On the left, the anger is directed at free market economics. On the far right, the hatred of foreigners and immigrants is the main motivation. Both 1 feelings and mindsets are incompatible: the former has a positive mindset whereas the latter is based on resentment.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019
    Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019 Codebook: SUPPLEMENT TO THE COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET – GOVERNMENT COMPOSITION 1960-2019 Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann The Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set provides detailed information on party composition, reshuffles, duration, reason for termination and on the type of government for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member countries. The data begins in 1959 for the 23 countries formerly included in the CPDS I, respectively, in 1966 for Malta, in 1976 for Cyprus, in 1990 for Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Latvia and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia. In order to obtain information on both the change of ideological composition and the following gap between the new an old cabinet, the supplement contains alternative data for the year 1959. The government variables in the main Comparative Political Data Set are based upon the data presented in this supplement. When using data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. Please quote this data set as: Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann. 2021. Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960-2019. Zurich: Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich. These (former) assistants have made major contributions to the dataset, without which CPDS would not exist. In chronological and descending order: Angela Odermatt, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, Sarah Engler, David Weisstanner, Panajotis Potolidis, Marlène Gerber, Philipp Leimgruber, Michelle Beyeler, and Sarah Menegal.
    [Show full text]
  • Of European and National Election Results Update: September 2018
    REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2018 A Public Opinion Monitoring Publication REVIEW OF EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTION RESULTS UPDATE: SEPTEMBER 2018 Directorate-General for Communication Public Opinion Monitoring Unit September 2018 - PE 625.195 TABLE OF CONTENTS EDITORIAL 1 1. COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 5 DISTRIBUTION OF SEATS EE2019 6 OVERVIEW 1979 - 2014 7 COMPOSITION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LAST UPDATE (10/09/2018) 8 CONSTITUTIVE SESSION (01/07/2014) 9 PROPORTION OF WOMEN AND MEN PROPORTION - LAST UPDATE 10 PROPORTIONS IN POLITICAL GROUPS - LAST UPDATE 11 PROPORTION OF WOMEN IN POLITICAL GROUPS - SINCE 1979 12 2. NUMBER OF NATIONAL PARTIES IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 13 3. TURNOUT: EE2014 15 TURNOUT IN THE LAST EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL ELECTIONS 16 TURNOUT IN THE EE2014 18 TURNOUT COMPARISON: 2009 (2013) - 2014 19 TURNOUT IN THE EE2014 - BREAKDOWN BY GENDER 20 TURNOUT IN THE EE2014 - BREAKDOWN BY AGE 21 TURNOUT OVERVIEW SINCE 1979 22 TURNOUT OVERVIEW SINCE 1979 - BY MEMBER STATE 23 4. NATIONAL RESULTS BY MEMBER STATE 27-301 GOVERNMENTS AND OPPOSITION IN MEMBER STATES 28 COMPOSITION OF THE EP: 2014 AND LATEST UPDATE POLITICAL PARTIES IN THE EP MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT - BY MEMBER STATE EE2014 TOTAL RESULTS EE2014 ELECTORAL LISTS - BY MEMBER STATE RESULTS OF TWO LAST NATIONAL ELECTIONS AND THE EE 2014 DIRECT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS SOURCES EDITORIAL First published in November 2014, the Review of European and National Elections offers a comprehensive, detailed and up-to-date overview on the composition of the European Parliament, national elections in all EU Member States as well as a historical overview on the now nearly forty years of direct elections to the European Parliament since 1979.
    [Show full text]