Who Killed Josip Reihl-Kir
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Većeslav Holjevac – Forgotten Dissident
94 Prispevki za novejšo zgodovino LVIII – 3/2018 1.01 UDC : 929HOLJEVAC V.:323.281»1918/1945« Josip Mihaljević* Većeslav Holjevac – Forgotten Dissident IZVLEČEK VEĆESLAV HOLJEVAC – POZABLJENI DISIDENT Hrvaški politik Većeslav Holjevac (1917–1970) velja za enega najuspešnejših županov mesta Zagreb. Kljub temu sta njegova osebnost in politično delo javnosti danes malo znana. Njegove zasluge na kulturnem področju so šle večinoma v pozabo, prav tako pa tudi dejstvo, da je bil edenn najpomembnejših hrvaških disidentov. Njegov primer razkriva vprašanje hrvaškega gibanja za nacionalno reformo, znanega pod imenom Hrvaška pomlad. Zaradi močnega značaja ga ni bilo strah braniti lastnih stališč celo v bojih s tovariši komunisti, ki so zasedali pomembnejše funkcije v hierarhiji Zveze komunistov Jugoslavije, kar je povzročilo njegov politični zaton. Članek predstavlja ključne trenutke njegovih disidentskih in politič- nih nesoglasij s tovariši, zaradi katerih si je v partiji prislužil status odpadnika. Prav tako obravnava trditve, da naj bi Holjevac postal vodja Hrvaške pomladi. Ključne besede: Većeslav Holjevac, disident, Zveza komunistov Jugoslavije, Komunistična partija Hrvaške, Hrvaška pomlad ABSTRACT Croatian politician Većeslav Holjevac (1917–1970) has been remembered as one of the most successful mayors of the city of Zagreb. However, his character and political work are scarcely known to the public today. His merits in the cultural sphere are mostly forgotten, as well as the fact that he was one of the most important Croatian dissidents. His case deli- neates the issue of the Croatian national reform movement known as the Croatian Spring. Due to his solid character he was not afraid to defend his standpoints, even in the fights with communist comrades who were higher in the hierarchy of the League of Communists * Research Fellow, PhD, Croatian Institute of History, Opatička 10, 10000-Zagreb, Croatia, [email protected] Josip Mihaljević: Većeslav Holjevac – Forgotten Dissident 95 of Yugoslavia, which caused his political decline. -
Civil Strife in Yugoslavia
S. HRG. 102-12 CIVIL STRIFE INYUGOSLAVIA: THE UNITED STATES RESPONSE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EUROPEAN AFFAIRS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED SECOND CONGRESS FIRST SESSION FEBRUARY 21, 1991 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 40-336 WASHINGTON : 1991 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Office US. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 :M I-a COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS CLAIBORNE PELL, Rhode Island, Chairman JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware JESSE HELMS, North Carolina PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana ALAN CRANSTON, California NANCY L. KASSEBAUM, Kansas CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut LARRY PRESSLER, South Dakota JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts FRANK H. MURKOWSKI, Alaska PAUL SIMON, Illinois MITCH McCONNELL, Kentucky TERRY SANFORD, North Carolina HANK BROWN, Colorado DANIEL P. MOYNIHAN, New York ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah CHARLES S. ROBB, Virginia GERYLD B. CHRiSTIANSON, Staff Director JAMES P. LUCIER, Minority Staff Director SUBCOMMITrEE ON EUROPEAN AFFAIRS JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware, Chairman PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland LARRY PRESSLER, South Dakota PAUL SIMON, Illinois HANK BROWN, Colorado CONTENTS Page Bentley, Hon. Helen, U.S. Representative from Maryland .....................................48 Prepared statem ent ................................................................................................. 62 Bonutti, Dr. Karl B., President, Slovenian-American Heritage Foundation, -
Međunarodne Studije, God
Međunarodne studije, god. 13, br. 2, 2013, str. 9- 1 Međunarodne studije god. 13, br. 3-4, 2013 Neorealizam (recenzija: Čehulić Vukadinović, Luša) 2 Monika Begović UKD 327 ISSN 1332-4756 MEĐUNARODNE STUDIJE Časopis za međunarodne odnose,vanjsku politiku i diplomaciju God. 13, br 3-4/2013. Godišnje izlaze četiri broja časopisa Naklada / 200 primjeraka Časopis ima inozemne recenzije Prilozi objavljeni u časopisu referiraju se u CSA/ Worldwide Political Science Abstracts, Sociological Abstract Social Services Abstracts Nakladnici Centar za međunarodne studije Hrvatske udruge za međunarodne studije, Zagreb Visoka škola međunarodnih odnosa i diplomacije Dag Hammarskjöld, Zagreb Euroavangarde d.o.o. Zagreb Uredništvo Goran Bandov, Luka Brkić, Lidija Čehulić Vukadinović, Jadranka Dujić Frlan, Gordan Grlić Radman, Drago Lovrić, Mladen Nakić, Jadranka Polović, Ivo Šlaus, Radovan Vukadinović Glavni i odgovorni urednik Radovan Vukadinović Izvršni urednici Jadranka Dujić Frlan Luka Brkić Lektura i korektura Iva Čupić Tajnik Kristijan Kotarski Klasifikacija članaka prema UDK Blaženka Peradenić-Kotur Tehnički urednik / prijelom Tiskara Zelina d.d. Međunarodno izdavačko vijeće Dr. Nadia Arbatova, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow Dr. Theodore Columbis, ELIAMEP, Athens /Dr. John Groom, Kent University, Canterbury Dr. Charles Chudde, University of Boston Dr. Anton Grizold, Fakultet za družbene vede, Ljubljana Dr. Shi Ze, Institute for International Relations, Beijing Dr. Lidija Georgieva, University St. Cyril and Methodius, Skopje Dr. Dragan Simić, Fakultet političih nauka , Beograd Dr. Dragan Vukčević, UDG, Podgorica / Dr. Stefano Piloto, University of Trieste Dr. Peter Stania, International Institute for Peace, Vienna Međunarodne studije, god. 13, br. 2, 2013, str. 9- 3 međunarodne studije god. 13, br. 3-4, 2013 Neorealizam (recenzija: Čehulić Vukadinović, Luša) 4 Monika Begović Međunarodne studije, god. -
Serbia and the Serbian Rebellion in Croatia (1990-1991)
Serbia and the Serbian Rebellion in Croatia (1990-1991) By Harry Jack Hayball Thesis submitted to Goldsmiths College, University of London, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy April 2015 Supervised by Professor Jan Plamper 2 Declaration All the work presented in this thesis is my own. Harry Jack Hayball Declaration 3 Abstract It is often suggested that the Serbian rebellion in Croatia in 1990-91 was orchestrated by Serbia, and, in particular, by its president Slobodan Milošević personally. Despite the popularity of this interpretation, however, the literature on the break-up of Yugoslavia is yet to offer a focused study of Serbia's role in the descent into conflict in Croatia. Many sources that have become available in recent years remain unused. Through a critical and cautious use of such sources, including extensive interviews with participants in the conflict and contemporary documentation, this thesis aims to fill this gap in the literature and to update our knowledge of this important aspect of the bloody disintegration of Yugoslavia. Honing in on Belgrade's relationships with Serb political and military/paramilitary leaders in Croatia, as well as Serbia's direct involvement in and attitude towards the road to war, it concludes that the existing focus on Milošević's Serbia has been misplaced. Serbia's stance towards Croatia was hardline, but Belgrade's influence over the Croatian Serbs was limited and its direct involvement in events minimal. Milošević did not have a grand plan to orchestrate violence in Croatia, and the leaders of the Serbian rebellion in Croatia were fundamentally independent and autonomous actors, who, far from being Milošević's puppets, were often in conflict with him. -
Зборник О Србима У Хрватској Academie Serbe Des Sciences Et Des Arts
ЗБОРНИК О СРБИМА У ХРВАТСКОЈ ACADEMIE SERBE DES SCIENCES ET DES ARTS COMITE POUR L’HISTOIRE DES SERBES EN CROATIE RECUEIL DES TRAVAUX SUR LES SERBES EN CROATIE 11 DIRECTEUR VASILIJE DJ. KRESTIĆ BELGRADE 2017 ISSN 0353-5967 СРПСКА АКАДЕМИЈА НАУКА И УМЕТНОСТИ ОДБОР ЗА ИСТОРИЈУ СРБА У ХРВАТСКОЈ ЗБОРНИК О СРБИМА У ХРВАТСКОЈ 11 УРЕДНИК ВАСИЛИЈЕ Ђ. КРЕСТИЋ БЕОГРАД 2017 РЕДАКЦИОНИ ОДБОР ВАСИЛИЈЕ Ђ. КРЕСТИЋ ДИНКО ДАВИДОВ ВОЈИН ДАБИЋ СОФИЈА БОЖИЋ СЕКРЕТАР МИРОСЛАВ ЈОВАНОВИЋ Примљено на X скупу Одељења историјских наука од 28. децембра 2016. на основу реферата академика Василија Ђ. Крестића, Михаила Војводића, Мирјане Живојиновић, Динка Давидова, Димитрија Стефановића, Наде Милошевић Ђорђевић, дописног члана Љубодрага Димића, проф. др Душана Иванића, Мире Радојевић, др Мелите Милин, Софије Божић и Душана Батаковића. АМБЛЕМ: ГРБОВИ СА ИКОНОСТАСА ЦРКВЕ СВ. НАСЛОВНА СТРАНА: ЈАНКО МАГЛОВСКИ ТОМЕ У ДИШНИКУ, РАД ЈОАКИМА ТЕХНИЧКИ УРЕДНИК: МИРА ЗЕБИЋ МАРКОВИЋА ИЗ 1750. ГОДИНЕ ЛЕКТОР: ЈЕЛКА ЈОВАНОВИЋ ИЗДАЈЕ: СРПСКА АКАДЕМИЈА НАУКА И УМЕТНОСТИ КОРЕКТОР: ЂУРЂЕВИЋ НЕВЕНА ТИРАЖ: 400 ПРИМЕРАКА ШТАМПА: ПЛАНЕТА ПРИНТ САДРЖАЈ – ТАBLE DES MATIERES Василије Ђ. Крестић Великохрватске претензије на Војводину ........................................................... 7 Vasilije Đ. Krestić Greater Croatian Pretensions to Vojvodina ...........................................................28 Мирјана Поповић Село Мокро поље према попису из 1831. године – пример демографских прилика код српског православног становништва у Северној Далмацији ........................................................................................... -
Pragmatic Peace the UNTAES Peacekeeping Mission As Example for Peaceful Reintegration of Occupied Multiethnic Territories
ema Awarded Theses 2017/2018 Sandra Kasunić Pragmatic Peace The UNTAES Peacekeeping Mission as Example for Peaceful Reintegration of Occupied Multiethnic Territories ema, The European Master’s Programme in Human Rights and Democratisation SANDRA KASUNI PRAGMATIC PEACE:ć THE UNTAES PEACEKEEPING MISSION AS AN EXAMPLE FOR PEACEFUL REINTEGRATION OF OCCUPIED MULTIETHNIC TERRITORIES SANDRA KASUNI ć FOREWORD The European Master’s Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation (EMA) is a one-year intensive programme launched in 1997 as a joint initiative of universities in all EU Member States with support from the European Commission. Based on an action- and policy-oriented approach to learning, it combines legal, political, historical, anthropological, and philosophical perspectives on the study of human rights and democracy with targeted skill-building activities. The aim from the outset was to prepare young professionals to respond to the requirements and challenges of work in international organisations, field operations, governmental and non-governmental bodies, and academia. As a measure of its success, EMA has served as a model of inspiration for the establishment of six other EU-sponsored regional master’s programmes in the area of human rights and democratisation in different parts of the world. These programmes cooperate closely in the framework of the Global Campus of Human Rights, which is based in Venice, Italy. 90 students are admitted to the EMA programme each year. During the first semester in Venice, students have the opportunity to meet and learn from leading academics, experts and representatives of international and non-governmental organisations. During the second semester, they relocate to one of the 41 participating universities to follow additional courses in an area of specialisation of their own choice and to conduct research under the supervision of the resident EMA Director or other academic staff. -
Evaluating Tuđman's Foreign Policy
Međunarodne studije, god. 13, br. 3-4, 2013, str. 55-79 55 Pregledni znanstveni članak UDK: 327(497.5)”1991/2000” Evaluating Tuđman’s Foreign Policy (Un)successful Protection of National Interest; From Defender to Despot1 Bojana Klepač Pogrmilović* Summary The majority of Croatian foreign policy creators and certain scholars evaluate Croatian foreign policy as very successful, especially when compared to do- mestic policy. Furthermore, the first Croatian president Franjo Tuđman – the main creator of Croatian foreign policy during the 1991-2000 period – is of- ten invoked as a supreme defender of Croatian national interests. This article challenges such positions by setting up a normative framework, which states that Croatian national interest was (is) to become a functional Europeanized parliamentary democracy, based on values, norms and principles formulated in acquis communautaire. Through simplified normativism, the article evalu- ates four main points: “respect for sovereignty”, “peace”, “market economy” and “rule of law” in which the Croatian foreign policy, whose main creator was Franjo Tuđman, largely contributed to the alienation of Croatia from its vital national interest. The final part of the article evaluates Tuđman’s thought that focuses mainly on the position of small peoples within multinational en- tities, democracy, Croatia and the EU etc. One of the main reasons of a failed democratic transition is found in Tuđman’s perception that Croatia became a democratic state just by formally adopting a democratic Constitution. Key words: Franjo Tuđman, national interests, Croatian foreign policy, Euro- peanization, (de)Tuđmanization Introduction On the “historical day for Croatia”, when its “return to Europe” was finally about to happen, there were “two Croats”. -
Univerza V Ljubljani Fakulteta Za Družbene Vede
UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI FAKULTETA ZA DRUŽBENE VEDE Stevo Đurašković Politike zgodovine na Hrvaškem in Slovaškem v 1990-ih The Politics of History in Croatia and Slovakia in the 1990s Doktorska disertacija Ljubljana, 2013 UNIVERZA V LJUBLJANI FAKULTETA ZA DRUŽBENE VEDE Stevo Đurašković Mentor: Red. Prof. dr. Igor Lukšič Somentor: Red. Prof. dr. Tihomir Cipek Politike zgodovine na Hrvaškem in Slovaškem v 1990-ih The Politics of History in Croatia and Slovakia in the 1990s Doktorska disertacija Ljubljana, 2013 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would sincerely like to thank my supervisors, Professors Igor Lukšič and Tihomir Cipek for all the help provided during the completion of this dissertation. This dissertation would not have been accomplished without the guidance and support they provided during the research and writing stages. Here I would also like to thank to members of my dissertation defense committee, Professors Janko Prunk and Silvia Miháliková, for all insightfull comments and remarks provided during the process of defense. I would like to express my gratitude to Professors Silvia Miháliková and Andrej Findor from the Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences of the Comenius University in Bratislava for all the help provided, not only for hosting me during my research fellowship and providing me with valuable materials and resources, but also for the support at times of hardship and difficulty to grasp the Slovak material. I would also like to thank Adam Hudek from Historical Institute of Slovak Academy of Sciences for supplying me with materials and devoting many evenings to creative discussions about the history of the Slovak national identity-building process. -
Confronting the Past: European Experiences Series of Political Science Research Centre Forum Book 10
Confronting the Past: European Experiences Series of Political Science Research Centre Forum Book 10 Series Editors Erna Matanović Anđelko Milardović Davor Pauković Davorka Vidović Nikolina Jožanc Višeslav Raos Reviewers Darko Gavrilović Mila Dragojević Publisher © by Political Science Research Centre Zagreb, 2012 ISBN 978-953-7022-26-6 CIP record is available in an electronic catalog of National and University Library numbered 804399 CONFRONTING THE PAST: EUROPEAN EXPERIENCES Editors Davor Pauković Vjeran Pavlaković Višeslav Raos www.cpi.hr Zagreb, May 2012 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................... 9 I. Politics of the Past 1. Three Aspects of Dealing with the Past: European Experience ............................................................... 17 Anđelko Milardović 2. International Legal and Institutional Mechanisms and Instruments that Influence on Creating Past ............................ 27 Maja Sahadžić 3. The Effects of National Identification and Perceived Termination of Inter-ethnic conflicts on Implicit Intergroup Bias (Infrahumanization, Linguistic Intergroup Bias and Agency) ............................................................................. 67 Csilla Banga, Zsolt Péter Szabó, János László 4. When Law Invades Utopia: The Past, the Peace and the Parties .......................................... 87 Colm Campbell 5. The War is over? Post-war and Post-communist Transitional Justice in East-Central Europe .............................................. -
Amnesty International
BEHIND A WALL OF SILENCE PRoSECUtIon of WAR CRImES In CRoAtIA CAmPAIgN FOr INtErNAtIONAL JuStICE Amnesty International is a global movement of 2.8 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the universal Declaration of Human rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. Amnesty International Publications First published in 2010 by Amnesty International Publications International Secretariat Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW united Kingdom www.amnesty.org © Amnesty International Publications 2010 Index: Eur 64/003/2010 Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, united Kingdom All rights reserved. this publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. the copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for re-use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. Cover photo: many places in Croatia still bear traces of the 1991-1995 conflict. the village of Sibenik in Bjelovar-Bilogora -
Vlada Demokratskog Jedinstva
SVEUČILIŠTE U SPLITU FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET Andrijana Perković Paloš VLADA DEMOKRATSKOG JEDINSTVA Doktorski rad Split, 2018. SVEUČILIŠTE U SPLITU FILOZOFSKI FAKULTET Andrijana Perković Paloš VLADA DEMOKRATSKOG JEDINSTVA Doktorski rad Mentor 1: prof. dr. sc. Aleksandar Jakir Mentor 2: izv. prof. dr. sc. Ante Nazor Split, 2018. Sadržaj 1. UVOD ............................................................................................................................................................... IV 1.1. ISTRAŽIVAČKA PITANJA, HIPOTEZA I ZNANSTVENI DOPRINOS ...................................................................... IV 1.2. ISTRAŽENOST TEME, IZVORI I LITERATURA .................................................................................................. VI 2.UVOĐENJE VIŠESTRANAČJA ..................................................................................................................... 1 2.1. SAVEZ KOMUNISTA HRVATSKE UOČI VIŠESTRANAČJA .................................................................................. 1 2.2. POLITIČKE STRANKE I PREDIZBORNA KAMPANJA .......................................................................................... 5 3. RAZILAŽENJA HRVATSKE VLASTI OKO OBRANE ZEMLJE ......................................................... 10 3.1. PRVE DVIJE VLADE DO AGRESIJE NA HRVATSKU ........................................................................................ 10 3.1.1. Položaj i sastav prve dvije Vlade ....................................................................................................... -
450 451 SEPARATE OPINION of JUDGE AD HOC KREĆA Table Of
450 SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE AD HOC KREĆA table of contents Paragraphs I. Legal Background 1-27 1. Constitutional concept of the Yugoslav State and of Croatia as a federal unit 2-17 2. Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the SFRY 18-27 II. Jurisdictional Issues 28-83 1. Validity in time complex in casu 28-45 1.1. From which date is the Genocide Convention in force as regards the Parties individually ? 29-33 1.2. From which date can the Genocide Convention be con- sidered as applicable between the Parties ? 34-35 1.3. Application of the principle in casu 36-43 1.4. By which date was the Genocide Convention in force as regards the SFRY ? 44-45 2. Nature and effects of the second preliminary objection of the Respondent 46-54 3. Treatment of preliminary objections to jurisdiction and admissibility in casu 55-59.1 4. Succession to responsibility as a purported rule of general international law 60-65.4 5. Rule in Article 10 (2) of the Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts as a purported rule of general international law 66-67 6. Applicable substantive law in casu in the light of rules on interpretation of treaties 68-79 7. The issue of the indispensable third party 80-83 III. Substantive Law Issues 84-138 1. Relationship between the ICJ and the ICTY in respect of the adjudication of genocide 84-106 1.1. The need for a balanced and critical approach to the jurisprudence of the ICTY 87 1.1.1.