DOCSLIB.ORG

Doctor of Pbilo!Gopbp in PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE FUNCTIONING OF THE LOKAYUKTA IN THE NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI, 2000-2009 THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF doctor of Pbilo!gopbp IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION BY KHAN KEHKASHAN LATIF UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DR. S. WASEEM AHMAD - - -' DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 2013 'L: 1 6 ; C';' 2014 Dedicated Slyly (Beloved Parents DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY, ALIGARH Tel: 0571-2721179 (R) Dr. S. Waseem AFimad 0571-2701720 (0) M.A..I.1,B.M.PhiI..Ph.D. Mob: 09412385583 (Sr. Associate Professor) Fax : 0571-2700528 r ma(: Dr.s%vahmad 1954', o.com Dated :.......................... Certificate l his is to certil\ that Ms. Khan Kehkashan Latif has completed her thesis entitled "The Functioning of the Lokayukta in the National Capital Territory of Delhi, 2000-2009" under my supervision and is. in my opinion. suitable for submission and for the award of the degree of doctor of Philosophy in Public Administration ofAligarh Muslim University, Aligarh. (Dr. S. Waseem Ahmad) Supervisor CONTENT Page No. Acknowledgement i-ii Preface u i-vili Chapter -1 Origin and Evolution of the Ombudsman 1-35 Chapter -2 Lokpal and Lokayukta in India 36-99 Chapter -3 Lokayukta in National Capital Territory of Delhi 100-125 Chapter -4 Functioning of Lokayukta in National Capital Territory of Delhi 126-159 Chapter -5 Conclusion 160-181 Bibliography 182-190 Appendices ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First of all I wish to thank the almighty 'ALLAH who bestowed upon me the ,e and patience to embark upon this work and carry it to its completion. I express my utmost gratitude to my supervisor Dr. S Waseem Ahmad. under pervision the entire work was planned and carried out. I am grateful for his ice, encouragement, critical comments, suggestions and continuous interest in )rk, which helped me to learn a lot of theoretical perspective, methodological nsions and analytical acumen of the theme of the research. His perseverance and firing attitude are worthy to be acknowledging in emphatic words of praise. I ;ider myself lucky to have worked under his supervision. My respects, admiration I thankfulness for him are unbounded. I would like to express my sincere thanks to the Chairman of the Department f Political Science Professor Arif Hameed for providing me all necessary facilities to make this work possible. I take this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude to all teachers of my department for their support and for developing healthy academic environment in the department. Moreover. I wish to acknowledge and give thanks to the staff of Maulana Azad Library. Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh; Seminar Library, Department of Political Science, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh; Jawaharlal Nehru University Library, New Delhi: Delhi University Library, New Delhi; Indian Institute of Public Administration Library, New Delhi; Indian Council of Social Science and Research Library, New Delhi, for helping me in getting the necessary material for my research work. It is my fortune to gratefully acknowledge the support of some specific individuals. Words fail me to express my appreciation to my friends Dr. Afifa Aisha Rehmat. Shumaila Naseer. Shaizy Ahmad, Dr. Salina, Dr. Cihazala Anjum, Arifa l'arvecn, Sharia Annum, Naazneen, Zenab, Nargis Saleem, Jhanara, Gauhar, Ghazala Parveen, Fauzia Khursheed, Nahid Akhtar, Farhat Bashir 'and Andalib. I would like to express my deep gratitude to my senior Dr. Ghazala for her support. I express my thanks to my sister Anjum Ara, sister in law Fauzia. Shecba, Shahjabeen they have given me unequivocal support throughout. I would like to make special mention of my brothers Ahab Ahmad. Mobin Ahmad, Azhar Ahmad and my brother in law Dr. Qumrul Hasan their love and prayers have always backed me to move forward. With the profound sense of gratitude and love, I must express the kind and generous support that I have been receiving from my beloved parents whose blessings have remained a constant source of enlightenment in all academic endeavours. I dedicated the present work to them. I am very much thankful to Mr. H. K. Sharma, who deserves commendation for his cooperation and efficient typing of this manuscript. (Khan Kchkashan Latif) nfl PREFACE The great writer, philosopher and historian. Edward Gibbon, when after completion of his book, "The Decline of Roman Empire" was confronted to reply in one word, the reason for the decline of Roman Empire, he remarked corruption. The corruption destroys political, social and economic structure of the country it also destroys democratic values and ideals. It is a barrier in the path of smooth development of every country. Corruption has always existed in the society in one form or the other. In every time administration was well aware of the corrupt practices and citizen's grievances and therefore it provided special systems to deal with grievances. The main reason behind all these efforts was that if the grievances of the people are not redressed in time then it might threaten the existence of the society. In past, Government was mainly concerned with the maintenance of law and order. Today due to the adoption of welfare State, role of Government has increased. The major problem before the modern administrative system is how to deal with the problem of corruption and provide citizens an institution which functions within the democratic frame work and enjoys confidence of the citizens. to which they can have an easy access for the speedy redressal of their grievances. It is also equally important to ensure that the review of administrative action is quick, thorough, cheap and impartial. It is chiefly to meet these needs that many countries in the past few years adopted the institution of Ombudsman. According to the International Ombudsman Institute, there are one hundred forty countries which are having Ombudsman at the national and subnational level. The Ombudsman had its origin in Sweden. In 1713 King Charles XII of the Sweden appointed the Hogste Ombudsman. iv But for all practical purposes the origin of Ombudsman office is traced to the 1809 constitution of the Sweden. The Ombudsman is considered as one of the accountability mechanisms to ensure responsibility and responsiveness of administration towards its citizens. The role of Ombudsman is to redress individual complaints and recommend reforms in administrative practices, procedures and policies in the interest of providing high-quality administration and for better service to the citizens. According to the Transparency International Corruption Perception Index 2012. India is ranked at ninety four in the list of one hundred seventy six countries ranging From least corrupt to most corrupt countries. Rapid growth of corruption both in the public services and political offices is a matter of serious concern for India. The list of scams and scandal in the country are endless. Corruption is a consequence of the nexus between bureaucracts, politicians, business man and criminals. After independence the need for anti-corruption machinery was strongly realized in India. Efforts had been made to look for a high level machinery to investigate into allegation of corruption against those who are occupying high places in Government such as Ministers, Member of Parliament, Member of State Legislature and Government Servants. The question came up for discussion, time and again, in different political assemblies and debates without any solid result. In the year 1966 Administrative Reform Commission headed by Shri Morarji Desai recommended the establishment of two Ombudsmen types of institutions viz. Lokpal and Lokavukta. The Lokpal was likely to deal with the complaints against the Ministers and the Secretaries of Government posted at the Centre and States. Lokayukta was to be appointed in each State and one for the Centre to look into the V complaints against public officials other than Ministers and Secretaries to the Government. For establishing the institution of Lokpal at the Centre, Lokpal Bills were introduced in the Lok Sabha in the year 1968, 1971, 1977, 1985, 1989, 1996, 1998, 2001. 2011. but due to one or the other reasons these Bills could not be passed. In the meanwhile, however several States went ahead with the idea of establishing the institution of Lokayukta. Orissa was the first State which had passed the Lokayukta Act in 1970 and Maharashtra was the first State which had established Lokayukta office in 1971. So far institution of the Lokayukta have been adopted in States such as Orissa, Maharashtra. Bihar, Rajasthan. Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh. Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka. Assam, Gujarat, Punjab, Delhi. Kerala, Chattisgarh, Haryana, Jharkhand. In the Indian context the Ombudsman has been looked upon chiefly as the machinery which will expose corruption and made efforts to correct it by giving recommendation. The Central theme of the thesis entitled, "The Functioning of the Lokayukta in the National Capital Territory of Delhi. 2000-2009", is an attempt to find out that how far the Lokayukta office is successful in achieving its aim in National Capital Territory of Delhi, what are its weaknesses and how can it improve its functioning. The office of Lokayukta in Delhi is established with a mission to eradicate corruption, favoritism, improve efficiency and promote fairness in public administration and also to present clear image of those public functionaries who are not corrupt. The whole plan of the study is divided into five chapters, each under specific theme dealt with somewhat in detail. The first chapter describe the origin and evolution of the Ombudsman, it also provides some information about institutions which were similar to Ombudsman in other time W and civilization, it also describes characteristic features of the Ombudsman institution, objectives of the Ombudsman, factors responsible for the spread of Ombudsman idea, role of Ombudsman. Ombudsman model of least corrupt countries such as Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway and New Zealand are also discuss briefly.
Recommended publications
  • Uttarakhand Lokayukta Bill, 2011 [Uttarakhand Bill No

    Uttarakhand Lokayukta Bill, 2011 [Uttarakhand Bill No

    THE UTTARAKHAND LOKAYUKTA BILL, 2011 [UTTARAKHAND BILL NO. OF 2011] A Bill to establish an independent authority to investigate offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 so as to detect corruption by expeditious investigation and to prosecute offenders and redressal of certain types of public grievances and to provide protection to whistleblowers. Be it enacted by Legislative Assembly of Uttarakhand in the Sixty-second year of the Republic of India as follows:- CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY Short title, 1. (1) This Act may be called the Uttarakhand Lokayukta Act, 2011. commencement (2) For the purpose of preparations, the provisions of the Act shall and extent come into force at once and the Act shall be operationalised within 180 days of its securing assent from the Governor of Uttarakhand. (3) It extends to the whole of the State of Uttarakhand. Definitions 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires:- (a) “Board” means the Chairperson and the other members of the Lokayukta collectively. (b) “Complaint” means an allegation of corruption or a request by whistleblower for protection or a request for redressal of certain grievances covered under this Act. (c) “Lokayukta” means and includes, (i) The Board; (ii) Benches constituted under this Act and performing functions under this Act; (d) “Lokayukta Bench” means a Bench of two or more members of the 1 Lokayukta with or without the Chairperson acting together in respect of any matter in accordance with the regulations framed under the Act. Each bench shall have a member with
  • Volume Xlv, No. 3 September, 1999 the Journal of Parliamentary Information

    Volume Xlv, No. 3 September, 1999 the Journal of Parliamentary Information

    VOLUME XLV, NO. 3 SEPTEMBER, 1999 THE JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION VOL. XLV NO.3 SEPTEMBER 1999 CONTENTS PAGE EDITORIAL NOTE 281 SHORT NOTES The Thirteenth Lok Sabha; Another Commitment to Democratic Values -LARRDIS 285 The Election of the Speaker of the Thirteenth Lok Sabha -LARRDIS 291 The Election of the Deputy Speaker of the Thirteenth Lok Sabha -LARRDIS 299 Dr. (Smt.) Najma Heptulla-the First Woman President of the Inter-Parliamentary Union -LARRDIS 308 Parliamentary Committee System in Bangladesh -LARRDIS 317 Summary of the Report of the Ethics Committee, Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly on Code of Conduct for Legislators in and outside the Legislature 324 PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES Conferences and Symposia 334 Birth Anniversaries of National Leaders 336 Indian Parliamentary Delegations Going Abroad 337 Bureau of Parliamentary Studies and Training 337 PARLIAMENTARY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 339 SESSIONAl REVIEW State Legislatures 348 SUMMARIES OF BooKS Mahajan, Gurpreet, Identities and Rights-Aspects of Liberal Democracy in India 351 Khanna, S.K., Crisis of Indian Democracy 354 RECENT LITERATURE OF PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 358 ApPENDICES I. Statement showing the work transacted during the Fourth Session of the Twelfth lok Sabha 372 II. Statement showing the work transacted during the One Hundred and Eighty-sixth Session of the Rajya Sabha 375 III. Statement showing the activities of the legislatures of the States and the Union territories during the period 1 April to 30 June 1999 380 IV. List of Bills passed by the Houses of Parliament and assented to by the President during the period 1 April to 30 June 1999 388 V.
  • Reference Material for Five Years Bachelor Of

    Reference Material for Five Years Bachelor Of

    NAAC ACCREDITED Affiliated to GGS IP University, New Delhi ‘A’ Grade Institute by DHE, Govt. of NCT Delhi and Approved by the Bar Council of India and NCTE Reference Material for Five Years Bachelor of Law (Hons.) Code : 035 Semester – IV DISCLAIMER : FIMT, ND has exercised due care and caution in collecting the data before publishing tis Reference Material. In spite of this ,if any omission ,inaccuracy or any other error occurs with regards to the data contained in this reference material, FIMT, ND will not be held responsible or liable. FIMT , ND will be grateful if you could point out any such error or your suggestions which will be of great help for other readers. 1 | P a g e COPYRIGHT FIMT 2020 INDEX Five Years Bachelor of Law (Hons.) Code : 035 Semester – IV .NO. SUBJECTS CODE PG.NO. 1 Family Law-II 202 4 - 57 2 Constitutional Law-II 204 58-134 3 Law of Crimes-II 206 135-176 4 Administrative 208 177-203 Law 5 Strategic 214 204-233 Management 2 | P a g e COPYRIGHT FIMT 2020 SUBJECT CODE: BBA LLB-202 SUBJECT: FAMILY LAW UNIT I 1. What are the various schools of Hindu Law? Differentiate between Mitakshara and Dayabhaga Schools? Answer INTRODUCION:- As we know that Hindu Law is two types : 1. Codified Hindu Law 2. Un-codified Hindu Law. 1. The codified Hindu law applies to all Hindu equally whereas the un-codified Hindu Law the situation is different. The application of Un-codified Hindu Law depends upon the context of different schools.
  • Civil) No 494 of 2012 Justice Ks Puttaswamy (Retd

    Civil) No 494 of 2012 Justice Ks Puttaswamy (Retd

    REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO 494 OF 2012 JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD) & ANR ...PETITIONERS Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ...RESPONDENTS WITH T C (C) NO 151 OF 2013 T C (C) NO 152 OF 2013 W P (C) NO 833 OF 2013 W P (C) NO 829 OF 2013 T P (C) NO 1797 OF 2013 W P (C) NO 932 OF 2013 1 T P (C) NO 1796 OF 2013 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 144 OF 2014 T P (C) NO 313 OF 2014 T P (C) NO 312 OF 2014 SLP (CRL) NO 2524 OF 2014 W P (C) NO 37 OF 2015 W P (C) NO 220 OF 2015 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 674 OF 2015 in W P (C) NO 829 OF 2013 T P (C) NO 921 OF 2015 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 470 OF 2015 W P (C) NO 231 OF 2016 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 444 OF 2016 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 608 OF 2016 W P (C) NO 797 OF 2016 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 844 OF 2017 2 W P (C) NO 342 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 372 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 841 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 1058 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 966 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 1014 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 1002 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 1056 OF 2017 AND WITH CONMT. PET. (C) NO 34 OF 2018 in W P (C) NO 1014 OF 2017 3 J U D G M E N T INDEX A Introduction: technology, governance and freedom B The Puttaswamy1 principles B.I Origins: privacy as a natural right B.2 Privacy as a constitutionally protected right : liberty and dignity B.3 Contours of privacy B.4 Informational privacy B.5 Restricting the right to privacy B.6 Legitimate state interests C Submissions C.I Petitioners’ submissions C.2 Respondents’ submissions D Architecture of Aadhaar: analysis of the legal framework E Passage of Aadhaar Act as a Money Bill E.I Judicial Review of the Speaker’s Decision E.2 Aadhaar Act as a Money Bill F Biometrics, Privacy and Aadhaar F.I Increased use of biometric technology F.2 Consent in the collection of biometric data F.3 Position before the Aadhaar legislation 1 (2017) 10 SCC 1 4 F.4 Privacy Concerns in the Aadhaar Act 1.
  • Combating Corruption

    Combating Corruption

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by International Public Management Review COMBATING CORRUPTION: LESSONS OUT OF INDIA Krishna K. Tummala ABSTRACT This paper deals with the ubiquitous problem of corruption among public officials– both elected and appointed, in India. By looking at the legal and administrative provisions to combat corruption, it is shown how futile the attempts so far have been. Among the plethora of reasons for failure to combat corruption, it is concluded that the more important ones are the inadequate and inefficient enforcement mechanisms, lack of political will, and more importantly the cultural context of social tolerance and easy forgiveness. Any outrage that is there is largely confined to rhetoric, not action. Despite some helpful developments such as the newly conferred freedom of information, active investigative media and engaged civic groups, reasons for optimism appear to be minimal. The need seems to be a serious effort to develop sound norms by changing the societal culture, which places the premium on the shoulders of political parties. International Public Management Review · electronic Journal at http://www.ipmr.net 34 Volume 10 · Issue 1 · 2009 · © International Public Management Network “One cannot mandate honesty.” Veerappa Moily, Chair, Second Administrative Reforms Commission, 2007 India did not invent corruption, but it seems to excel in it. Preoccupation with the subject is almost ancient. While categorizing “forty ways of embezzlement” and as to how to deal with that, Kautilya made the following observation about human behavior: “Just as it is impossible not to taste the honey or the poison that finds itself at the tip of the tongue, so it is impossible for a government servant not to eat up, at least, a bit of the king’s revenue.
  • Judicial Review and Money BILLS

    Judicial Review and Money BILLS

    J UDICIAL REVIEW AND MONEY BILLS Pratik Datta, Shefali Malhotra & Shivangi Tyagi* Under the existing constitutional scheme in India, for a bill to be enacted into a law, it has to be approved by both Houses of the Parliament – the Lower House (Lok Sabha) and the Upper House (Rajya Sabha). However, one significant exception to this general rule is the certification of a bill as a ‘money bill’ by the Speaker of the Lower House, whereupon the bill can be enacted into a law by the Lower House alone, without any approval from the Upper House. Although the scope of a ‘money bill’ is broadly delineated in the Constitution, it is possible that a bill could be incorrectly certified as a ‘money bill’ by the Speaker and enacted into a law without the approval of the Upper House. Further, the Constitution accords finality to the decision of the Speaker as to whether the bill is a ‘money bill’, thus raising issues such as whether such finality would bar the Supreme Court from review- ing the accuracy of the Speaker’s decision in this regard; and whether the Supreme Court can strike down such a law as being unconstitutional, if the Speaker’s decision is indeed found to be incorrect. In this paper, we exam- ine these questions which are of immense contemporary relevance in India, and attempt to posit our conclusions to the same. I. INTRODUCTION Under the extant constitutional scheme in India, for a bill to be enacted into a law, it has to be approved by both Houses of the Parliament – the Lower House (Lok Sabha) and the Upper House (Rajya Sabha).
  • Corruption in India: Bridging Research Evidence and Policy Options

    Corruption in India: Bridging Research Evidence and Policy Options

    Corruption in India: Bridging Research Evidence and Policy Options Sandip Sukhtankar1 Milan Vaishnav2 April 27, 2015 Abstract Corruption has become an increasingly salient issue in India today, spawning both enormous interest from the media as well as a large amount of academic research. Yet there is a large gap between what has captured the media’s attention, the policy options under discussion, and the actual evidence base drawn from empirical research on corruption. We attempt to bridge this gap, directly addressing the particular challenges that corruption in India poses. Academic evidence supports the popular perception that corruption is widespread and endemic. However, we find that the costs of day-to-day corruption are just as large, if not larger, than those of the “scams” that dominate headlines. Further, we find that there is very little evidence to support the idea that greater transparency, information, and community based efforts have a significant impact on reducing corruption on their own. This is also true for some technological interventions, although those interventions – like direct benefit transfers – that bypass middlemen and corrupt officials have a much greater scope for success, as do interventions that transfer bargaining power to citizens and beneficiaries. We find much to commend in the sensible and wide-ranging legislative agenda to combat corruption, including the Right to Service and Public Procurement bills. However, what is most important for combating corruption is not the law on paper but the implementation of the law; the binding constraint, as always, is the government’s desire and ability to punish corrupt officials and politicians.
  • The Journal of Parliamentary Information

    The Journal of Parliamentary Information

    THE JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION VOLUME XXXIV, No. 2 JUNE, 1988 THE JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION Editor: DR SUBHASH C. KAsHYAP The Journal of ParJiamentaIY Infonnation. a quarterly publication brought out by the Lok Sabha Secretariat, aims at the dissemination of authoritative infonnation about the practices and procedures that are continuously being evolved in Indian and foreign u,gislatures. The Journal also purports to serve as an authentic recorder of important parliament8l)' events and activities and provides a useful forum to members of Parlia- ment and State Legislatures and other experts for the expression of their views and opinions thereby contributing to the development and streng- thening of parliamentmy' democracy in the counby. The Editor would welcome articles on constitutional, parliamentmy and subjects for publication in the Journal. A modest, token hono- rarium1. is payable for articles etc. accepted for publication in the Journal. The articles should be type-written on only one side of the paper. Latest standard books are reviewed in the Journal by members of Parliament and scholars. Books intended for review- should be sent to the Editor. The views expressed in the signed articles etc. published in the Journal are those of the authors and the Lok Sabha Secretariat does not accept any responsibility for them. Copyright for the articles, notes and reviews published in the Journal vests with the Lok Sabha Secretariat and prior written pennission from the Editor should be obtained for the reproduuion of any material from the Journal. A copy of the publication in which an article is so reproduced should be sent to the Editor.
  • JPI March 2015.Pdf

    JPI March 2015.Pdf

    The Journal of Parliamentary Information VOLUME LXI NO. 1 MARCH 2015 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. 24, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi-2 EDITORIAL BOARD Editor : Anoop Mishra Secretary-General Lok Sabha Associate Editors : D. Bhalla Secretary Lok Sabha Secretariat P.K. Misra Additional Secretary Lok Sabha Secretariat Sayed Kafil Ahmed Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Assistant Editors : Pulin B. Bhutia Additional Director Lok Sabha Secretariat Sanjeev Sachdeva Joint Director Lok Sabha Secretariat V. Thomas Ngaihte Joint Director Lok Sabha Secretariat © Lok Sabha Secretariat, New Delhi THE JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY INFORMATION VOLUME LXI NO. 1 MARCH 2015 CONTENTS PAGE EDITORIAL NOTE 1 PARLIAMENTARY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES Conferences and Symposia 3 Birth Anniversaries of National Leaders 4 Exchange of Parliamentary Delegations 8 Parliament Museum 9 Bureau of Parliamentary Studies and Training 9 PRIVILEGE ISSUES 11 PROCEDURAL MATTERS 13 PARLIAMENTARY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENTS 15 DOCUMENTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL AND PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 27 SESSIONAL REVIEW Lok Sabha 41 Rajya Sabha 56 State Legislatures 72 RECENT LITERATURE OF PARLIAMENTARY INTEREST 74 APPENDICES I. Statement showing the work transacted during the Third Session of the Sixteenth Lok Sabha 82 II. Statement showing the work transacted during the 233rd Session of the Rajya Sabha 86 III. Statement showing the activities of the Legislatures of the States and Union Territories during the period 1 October to 31 December 2014 91 (iv) iv The Journal of Parliamentary Information IV. List of Bills passed by the Houses of Parliament and assented to by the President during the period 1 October to 31 December 2014 97 V.
  • UPPSC Polity and Governance.Indd

    UPPSC Polity and Governance.Indd

    UPPSC | POLITY & GOVERNANCE | 3 UPPSC Prelims POLITY & GOVERNANCE CONTENTS Uttar Pradesh: Polity & Governance At a Glance ....................04 Formation of Uttar Pradesh ...................................................... 04 Executive of U.P. ......................................................................... 05 Legislature of Uttar Pradesh ..................................................... 08 The Judiciary ................................................................................ 11 Local Self Government ............................................................... 14 Governance in Uttar Pradesh .................................................... 16 4 UPPSC | POLITY & GOVERNANCE | UTTAR PRADESH: POLITY & GOVERNANCE AT A GLANCE Statehood 24th January 1950 Date of Establishment 1st November 1956 Capital Lucknow Districts 75 Governor Anandiben Mafatbhai Patel Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath (BJP) Cities Towns 689 Development Blocks 822 Muncipal Corpration 13 Members of Lok Sabha from U.P. 80 Members of Rajya Sabha from U.P. 31 Members of U.P. Legislative Council 404 Members of U.P. Legislative Assembly 100 High Court Prayagraj Section Bench Lucknow FORMATION OF UTTAR PRADESH The state was under Bengal Presidency till 1834. In January 1858, Lord Canning proceeded to Allahabad and formed the North Western Province excluding Delhi division. The seat of power was thus shifted from Agra to Allahabad. This was followed by the transfer of the High Court from Agra to Allahabad in 1868. In 1856, Awadh was placed under the Chief Commissioner. The districts were later merged with the North Western Province and began to be known as ‘North Western Provinces and Oudh’ in 1877. The entire province came to be known as the ‘United Provinces of Agra and Oudh’ in 1902. First election for the Legislative Council was held in 1920 and it was constituted in Lucknow in 1921. Since the governor, ministers and secretaries to governor had to be in Lucknow, the then governor Sir Harcourt Butler changed his headquarters from Allahabad to Lucknow.
  • India 2015 Human Rights Report

    India 2015 Human Rights Report

    INDIA 2015 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY India is a multiparty, federal, parliamentary democracy with a bicameral parliament. The president, elected by an electoral college, is the head of state, and the prime minister is the head of the government. Under the constitution the 29 states and seven union territories have a high degree of autonomy and have primary responsibility for law and order. Voters elected President Pranab Mukherjee in 2012 to a five-year term, and Narendra Modi became prime minister following the victory of the National Democratic Alliance coalition led by the Bharatiya Janata Party in the May 2014 general elections. Observers considered these elections, which included more than 551 million participants, free and fair, despite isolated instances of violence. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the security forces. The most significant human rights problems involved police and security force abuses, including extrajudicial killings, torture, and rape; corruption remained widespread and contributed to ineffective responses to crimes, including those against women, children, and members of scheduled castes or tribes; and societal violence based on gender, religious affiliation, and caste or tribe. Other human rights problems included disappearances, hazardous prison conditions, arbitrary arrest and detention, and lengthy pretrial detention. Court backlogs delayed or denied justice, including through lengthy pretrial detention and denial of due process. There were instances of infringement of privacy rights. The law in some states restricted religious conversion, and there were reports of arrests but no reports of convictions under those laws. Some limits on the freedom of movement continued. Rape, domestic violence, dowry-related deaths, honor killings, sexual harassment, and discrimination against women remained serious societal problems.
  • Life and Death in the Times Of

    Life and Death in the Times Of

    2020 i COMMONWEALTH HUMAN RIGHTS INITIATIVE The Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI) is an independent, non-governmental, non-profit organisation headquartered in New Delhi, India, with offices in London, United Kingdom, and Accra, Ghana. Since 1987, it has advocated, engaged and mobilised around human rights issues in Commonwealth countries. Its specialisations in the areas of Access to Justice (ATJ) and Access to Information (ATI) are widely known. The ATJ programme has focussed on Police and Prison Reforms, to reduce arbitrariness and ensure transparency while holding duty bearers to accountability. CHRI looks at policy interventions, including legal remedies, building civil society coalitions and engaging with stakeholders. The ATI programme looks at Right to Information (RTI) LIFE AND DEATH IN THE TIME OF RTI and Freedom of Information laws across geographies, provides specialised advice, sheds light on challenging issues and processes for widespread use of transparency laws and develops capacity. We review pressures on media and CASE STUDIES FROM MAHARASHTRA media rights while a focus on Small States seeks to bring civil society voices to bear on the UN Human Rights Council and the Commonwealth Secretariat. A new area of work is SDG 8.7 whose advocacy, research and mobilisation across geographies is built on tackling contemporary forms of slavery. CHRI has special consultative status with the UN Economic and Social Council and is accredited to the Commonwealth Secretariat. Recognised for its expertise by governments, oversight bodies and civil society, CHRI is registered as a society in India, a limited charity in London and an NGO in Ghana. Although the Commonwealth, an association of 54 nations, provided member countries the basis of shared an investigative report by common laws, there was little specific focus on human rights issues in member countries.