DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution of the Civil Affairs Force

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution of the Civil Affairs Force View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2013-12 The evolution of the Civil Affairs force Ferry, John V. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/38928 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE EVOLUTION OF THE CIVIL AFFAIRS FORCE by John V. Ferry Benny H. Romero December 2013 Thesis Co-advisors: George Lober Camber Warren Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704–0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202–4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704–0188) Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED December 2013 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS THE EVOLUTION OF THE CIVIL AFFAIRS FORCE 6. AUTHOR(S) John V. Ferry and Benny H. Romero 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943–5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S. Government. IRB Protocol number ____N/A____. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited A 13. ABSTRACT (maximum 200 words) Beginning with the United States (U.S.)–Mexican War in 1846 and continuing to the most recent combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, United States military history has repeatedly shown the importance of civil affairs operations: that is, shaping the civil component of the operational environment. During this span, civil affairs operations have evolved from operations conducted only by combat units to those conducted by a dedicated Civil Affairs force. The demand for Civil Affairs has increased significantly since September 11, 2001, and in response to that demand, the Army has attempted to grow the Civil Affairs force in both the active and reserve components. The rapid growth in demand for Civil Affairs has led to the creation of a Civil Affairs force composed of one active-duty Civil Affairs special-operations brigade, one active-duty Civil Affairs brigade for conventional forces, and nine reserve civil affairs brigades. The current Civil Affairs force structure is subordinate to three commands: the U.S. Army Special Operations Command, U.S. Forces Command, and the U.S. Army Reserve Command. This thesis analyzes the current Civil Affairs force structure within the active and reserve components by using three metrics: training efficiency, organizational efficiency, and operational efficiency. It addresses the question of whether the current Civil Affairs structure reflects the most efficient design, and if not, what changes are needed to improve efficiency. 14. SUBJECT TERMS Civil Affairs, Force Structure, 95th Civil Affairs Brigade (A), 85th Civil 15. NUMBER OF Affairs Brigade, U.S. Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command, Unification, Unity PAGES of Effort, Operational Efficiency, Organizational Efficiency, Training Efficiency, Network 115 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20. LIMITATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF THIS CLASSIFICATION OF ABSTRACT REPORT PAGE ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified UU NSN 7540–01–280–5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2–89) Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239–18 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THE EVOLUTION OF THE CIVIL AFFAIRS FORCE John V. Ferry Major, United States Army B.A., Mississippi State University, 1998 Benny H. Romero Major, United States Army B.A., Texas State University, San Marcos, 2001 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN DEFENSE ANALYSIS from the NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL December 2013 Authors: John V. Ferry Benny H. Romero Approved by: George Lober Thesis Co-advisor Camber Warren Thesis Co-advisor John Arquilla Chair, Department of Defense Analysis iii THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK iv ABSTRACT Beginning with the United States (U.S.)–Mexican War in 1846 and continuing to the most recent combat operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, United States military history has repeatedly shown the importance of civil affairs operations: that is, shaping the civil component of the operational environment. During this span, civil affairs operations have evolved from operations conducted only by combat units to those conducted by a dedicated Civil Affairs force. The demand for Civil Affairs has increased significantly since September 11, 2001, and in response to that demand, the Army has attempted to grow the Civil Affairs force in both the active and reserve components. The rapid growth in demand for Civil Affairs has led to the creation of a Civil Affairs force composed of one active-duty Civil Affairs special-operations brigade, one active-duty Civil Affairs brigade for conventional forces, and nine reserve civil affairs brigades. The current Civil Affairs force structure is subordinate to three commands: the U.S. Army Special Operations Command, U.S. Forces Command, and the U.S. Army Reserve Command. This thesis analyzes the current Civil Affairs force structure within the active and reserve components by using three metrics: training efficiency, organizational efficiency, and operational efficiency. It addresses the question of whether the current Civil Affairs structure reflects the most efficient design, and if not, what changes are needed to improve efficiency. v THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK vi TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 A. BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................1 B. RESEARCH QUESTION ...............................................................................4 C. HYPOTHESIS..................................................................................................4 D. LITERATURE REVIEW ...............................................................................4 E. THEORY ..........................................................................................................9 F. METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................11 II. ANALYSIS OF CURRENT CIVIL AFFAIRS FORCE STRUCTURE ..............13 A. ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY ..........................................................13 B. TRAINING EFFICIENCY ...........................................................................15 C. OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY ..................................................................16 III. CASE STUDIES .........................................................................................................19 A. ORGANIZATIONAL EFFICIENCY–UNITED STATES NORTHERN COMMAND ...........................................................................19 1. Organizational Efficiency ..................................................................21 2. Training and Exercises: Building Relationships .............................23 3. Dual-Status Command in Action–Republican National Convention ..........................................................................................25 4. Waldo Canyon Fire–Colorado ..........................................................26 5. Conclusion ..........................................................................................27 B. TRAINING EFFICIENCY–CREATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY .....................................................................27 1. Flexible and Fast Training Response ...............................................29 2. Cost Avoidance and Operational Efficiencies .................................32 C. OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY–THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REORGANIZATION ACT OF 1986 (GOLDWATER– NICHOLS ACT) ............................................................................................35 1. Failed Iranian Rescue ........................................................................36 2. Marine Barracks Bombing................................................................37 3. GNA Objectives ..................................................................................37 4. Gulf War .............................................................................................38 5. Somalia ................................................................................................39 6. Conclusion ..........................................................................................40
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Defense 2020 “Covid-19 and the U.S. Military”
    Center for Strategic and International Studies TRANSCRIPT Defense 2020 “Covid-19 and the U.S. Military” RECORDING DATE Wednesday, April 1, 2020 GUESTS Steve Morrison Senior Vice President, and Director, Global Health Policy Center, CSIS Mark Cancian Senior Advisor, International Security Program, CSIS Christine Wormuth Director, International Security and Defense Policy Center, RAND Corporation Christine Wormuth Director, International Security and Defense Policy Center, RAND Corporation HOST Rear Admiral (Ret.) Tom Cullison Former Deputy Surgeon General of the U.S. Navy, and Adjunct Fellow, Global Health Policy Center, CSIS Transcript by Rev.com Kathleen Hicks: Hi, I'm Kathleen Hicks, Senior Vice President and Director of the International Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and this is Defense 2020 a CSIS podcast examining critical defense issues in the United States is 2020 election cycle. We bring in defense experts from across the political spectrum to survey the debates over the US military strategy, missions and funding. This podcast is made possible by contributions from BAE systems, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and the Thales Group. Kathleen Hicks: On this episode of Defense 2020, I hosted discussion with four experts on COVID-19 and the US military. Steve Morrison, Senior Vice President and Director of Global Health Policy at CSIS, Mark Cancian, Senior Advisor in the International Security Program at CSIS, Christine Wormuth, Director of the International Security and Defense Policy Center at the RAND Corporation and Rear Admiral (Ret.), Tom Cullison Former Deputy Surgeon General of the US Navy and an Adjunct Fellow in the Global Health Policy Center at CSIS.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Policy and Military Strategy in the Middle East
    S. HRG. 114–350 UNITED STATES POLICY AND MILITARY STRATEGY IN THE MIDDLE EAST HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 24; SEPTEMBER 22; OCTOBER 27, 2015 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:53 Sep 08, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 C:\USERS\WR47328\DESKTOP\21401.TXT WILDA UNITED STATES POLICY AND MILITARY STRATEGY IN THE MIDDLE EAST VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:53 Sep 08, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 C:\USERS\WR47328\DESKTOP\21401.TXT WILDA S. HRG. 114–350 UNITED STATES POLICY AND MILITARY STRATEGY IN THE MIDDLE EAST HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 24; SEPTEMBER 22; OCTOBER 27, 2015 Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 21–401 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 10:53 Sep 08, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\USERS\WR47328\DESKTOP\21401.TXT WILDA COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona, Chairman JAMES M. INHOFE, Oklahoma JACK REED, Rhode Island JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama BILL NELSON, Florida ROGER F.
    [Show full text]
  • Whither America? a Strategy for Repairing America’S Political Culture
    Whither America? A Strategy for Repairing America’s Political Culture John Raidt Foreword by Ellen O. Tauscher Whither America? A Strategy for Repairing America’s Political Culture Atlantic Council Strategy Paper No. 13 © 2017 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publi- cation may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Please direct inquiries to: Atlantic Council 1030 15th Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20005 ISBN: 978-1-61977-383-7 Cover art credit: Abraham Lincoln by George Peter Alexander Healy, 1869 This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intel- lectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommenda- tions. The Atlantic Council, its partners, and funders do not determine, nor do they necessari- ly endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s particular conclusions. November 2017 Atlantic Council Strategy Papers Editorial Board Executive Editors Mr. Frederick Kempe Dr. Alexander V. Mirtchev Editor-in-Chief Mr. Barry Pavel Managing Editor Dr. Mathew Burrows Table of Contents FOREWORD ....................................................................................................................i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................2 WHITHER AMERICA? ...............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Was the Paris Massacre Yet Another False Flag?
    mean Will the the end refugee of Europe? crisis THINK FOR YOURSELF Issue 42: December 2015 – March 2016 Price: $NZ9.90 $A9.95 $US8.95 Was The Paris Massacre Yet Another False Flag? Behind Putin’s Mideast Strategy Water as Fuel Technology – Built in 1935 Climate Change Caused by “Secret Chemical Weapons” Is the Pope a Luciferian? More Astonishing Healing Properties of Cannabis Is the NWO Agenda the Alien Agenda? ALSOAspartame IN THIS ConfirmedISSUE ... as Biological Weapon 42 REALITY GOT YOU DOWN? Issue 1: COLLECTOR’S EDITION “I’d rather have a free bottle in If you start feeling front of me better about yourself, than a prefrontal you’re not thinking. lobotomy.” “Why spend good money on candles, when it’s cheaper to curse the darkness?” A woman’s place is in the home. A man’s place is in a vicious, inhumane, totalitarian corporation. “If it weren’t for pickpockets I’d have no sex life at all.” NOW! WITH EXTRA SARCASM AT NO EXTRA COST!!! Price: $5.95 The Pessimist’s Book of Wisdom By Jonathan Eisen (Editor of Uncensored) Only $10 (includes P/H to NZ and Australia). Please post your order (cheques or credit card details) to: The Full Court Press Ltd. PO Box 44-128, Pt Chevalier, Auckland 1246, NZ “If people in the media cannot de- cide whether they are in the busi- “Instead of the triumph of democracy and progress, we got violence, poverty and social disaster. Nobody cares a bit about ness of reporting news or manu- human rights, including the right to life.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Officials September 1947–July 2021
    Department of Defense Key Officials September 1947–July 2021 Historical Office Office of the Secretary of Defense Contents Introduction 1 I. Current Department of Defense Key Officials 2 II. Secretaries of Defense 5 III. Deputy Secretaries of Defense 11 IV. Secretaries of the Military Departments 17 V. Under Secretaries and Deputy Under Secretaries of Defense 28 Research and Engineering .................................................28 Acquisition and Sustainment ..............................................30 Policy ..................................................................34 Comptroller/Chief Financial Officer ........................................37 Personnel and Readiness ..................................................40 Intelligence and Security ..................................................42 VI. Specified Officials 45 Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation ...................................45 General Counsel of the Department of Defense ..............................47 Inspector General of the Department of Defense .............................48 VII. Assistant Secretaries of Defense 50 Acquisition ..............................................................50 Health Affairs ...........................................................50 Homeland Defense and Global Security .....................................52 Indo-Pacific Security Affairs ...............................................53 International Security Affairs ..............................................54 Legislative Affairs ........................................................56
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress
    U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Shirley A. Kan Specialist in Asian Security Affairs October 27, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32496 U.S.-China Military Contacts: Issues for Congress Summary This CRS Report, updated through the 113th Congress, discusses policy issues regarding military- to-military (mil-to-mil) contacts with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and records major contacts and crises since 1993. The United States suspended military contacts with China and imposed sanctions on arms sales in response to the Tiananmen Crackdown in 1989. In 1993, President Clinton reengaged with the top PRC leadership, including China’s military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). Renewed military exchanges with the PLA have not regained the closeness reached in the 1980s, when U.S.-PRC strategic alignment against the Soviet Union included U.S. arms sales to China. Improvements and deteriorations in overall bilateral engagement have affected military contacts, which were close in 1997-1998 and 2000, but marred by the 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait crisis, mistaken NATO bombing of a PRC embassy in 1999, the EP-3 aircraft collision crisis in 2001, and the PLA’s aggressive maritime and air confrontations. Issues for Congress include whether the Administration complies with legislation overseeing dealings with the PLA and pursues contacts with the PLA that advance a prioritized set of U.S. security interests, especially the operational safety of U.S. military personnel. Oversight legislation includes the Foreign Relations Authorization Act for FY1990-FY1991 (P.L. 101-246) and National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2000 (P.L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Credit Union Cherry Blossom Ten Mile Run 1 Men's Results
    Men’s Results 2010 Credit Union Cherry Blossom Ten Mile Run Men’s Results 2010 Credit Union Cherry Blossom Ten Mile Run Event Director Message 2010 RACE COMMITTEE Event Director Phil Stewart Deputy Race Director/Treasurer Irv Newman More Good Weather and Plenty of Green Race Support Manager Becky Lambros President Welcome to our first “Green” post-race results publication. As part of our Dennis Steinauer 5K Run-Walk initiative to “Green” this year’s event we have saved some trees by bringing Steve Esmacher the results “book” in electronic format. Enjoy the same pictures, stories and Administration and Scoring Kathy Freedman Men’s Results results as before, but without guilt. Rick Freedman Announcer Let me be the first to offer my congratulations to all of our finishers – you Creigh Kelley Kari Keaton will find your names included in this publication. Awards As always, I am deeply indebted to all of my race committee members Nancy Betress Bag Check – especially Deputy Race Director Irv Newman and Race Support Manager Candice Mothersille Timi Rogers Becky Lambros — who toiled throughout the year to make it all happen. Kevin Everette (5K) In a tough economic environment, our title sponsor, Credit Union Command Central Mark Wheatley Miracle Day, raised over $923,000 for the Children’s Miracle Network. In the Communications eight years of the CUMD’s sponsorship, the event has raised over $4 million Kenny Donovan Consultant dollars to help children in need of medical care through the Children’s Jeff Darman Corrals Miracle Network. A significant portion of those funds goes to Washington, DC’s own Children’s Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperatives for Enhancing Defense Support of Civil Authorities
    Before Disaster Strikes Imperatives for Enhancing Defense Support of Civil Authorities The Report of the Advisory Panel on Department of Defense Capabilities for Support of Civil Authorities After Certain Incidents to the Secretary of Defense and the Chairmen and Ranking Minority Members, Committees on Armed Services, U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives September 15, 2010 Publication Notice The Advisory Panel on Department of Defense Capabilities for Support of Civil Authorities After Certain Incidents was established by Section 1082 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, Public Law 110-181 (January 26, 2008). That Act directed that a Federally Funded Research and Development Center provide research, analytical, and other support to the Advisory Panel during the course of its activities and deliberations. The RAND Corporation has provided that support, under contract from the Department of Defense, since the Advisory Panel’s inception. This report is a document of the Advisory Panel, not a RAND publication. It is being submitted to the Secretary of Defense and the Committees on Armed Services of the U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representatives in accor- dance with requirements in the enabling legislation. It is not copyrighted but does contain material from copyrighted sources. Copies of the report may be obtained via the Internet at http://www.rand.org/nsrd/DoD-CBRNE-Panel/. About the RAND Corporation RAND’s mission is to improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. Although RAND confronts different policy challenges over time, its principles remain constant. RAND research and analysis aim to • Provide practical guidance by making policy choices clear and addressing barriers to effective policy implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Policy Outlook
    2021 Policy Outlook As the 2020 campaign season enters its waning days, Crossroads Strategies is pleased to provide this broad overview of policy issues in in the next Congress and how the outcomes of the upcoming elections might impact their consideration. CRS will provide additional in-depth analysis of more specific policy issues in the weeks following November 3rd. In addition to a policy overview, this update also includes informed speculation on potential Cabinet and sub- Cabinet leadership in a second Trump and Biden Administration Finally, it provides a brief overview of the potential dynamics of a potential contested presidential election. Given the potential for a Democratic sweep, it is important to consider procedural tools available under unified government. The first is budget reconciliation. This is a fast-track process that allows the majority party to utilize the annual congressional budget process to bypass the typical 60-vote hurdle in the Senate and advance policy and funding goals, with only a simple majority. The budget is a privileged motion in the Senate, meaning the rules dictate it cannot be filibustered, but it can only be used once in a budget cycle. The universe of policies that may be considered under reconciliation is limited to those changes that have a significant impact on federal spending, and the budget process is subject to numerous rules and points of order. Republicans successfully used reconciliation to move the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act but were unable to use it as part of a strategy to fully Repeal and Replace the Affordable Care Act. The limitations of the reconciliation and increased use of the filibuster by the minority part in the Senate over the last several Congresses have led to serious discussion of changes to the legislative filibuster in the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Planning in a Time of Conflict a Comparative Analysis of the 2001–2014 Quadrennial Defense Reviews, and Implications for the Army
    C O R P O R A T I O N Defense Planning in a Time of Conflict A Comparative Analysis of the 2001–2014 Quadrennial Defense Reviews, and Implications for the Army Eric V. Larson, Derek Eaton, Michael E. Linick, John E. Peters, Agnes Gereben Schaefer, Keith Walters, Stephanie Young, H. G. Massey, Michelle Darrah Ziegler For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/rr1309 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN 978-0-8330-9248-9 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.html. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This is the final report of a RAND Arroyo Center study for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress
    Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress Ronald O'Rourke Specialist in Naval Affairs April 22, 2015 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R42784 Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) Disputes Involving China Summary China’s actions for asserting and defending its maritime territorial and exclusive economic zone (EEZ) claims in the East China (ECS) and South China Sea (SCS), particularly since late 2013, have heightened concerns among observers that ongoing disputes over these waters and some of the islands within them could lead to a crisis or conflict between China and a neighboring country such as Japan, the Philippines, or Vietnam, and that the United States could be drawn into such a crisis or conflict as a result of obligations the United States has under bilateral security treaties with Japan and the Philippines. More broadly, China’s actions for asserting and defending its maritime territorial and EEZ claims have led to increasing concerns among some observers that China may be seeking to dominate or gain control of its near-seas region, meaning the ECS, the SCS, and the Yellow Sea. Chinese domination over or control of this region, or Chinese actions that are perceived as being aimed at achieving such domination or control, could have major implications for the United States, including implications for U.S.-China relations, for interpreting China’s rise as a major world power, for the security structure of the Asia-Pacific region, for the long-standing U.S. strategic goal of preventing the emergence of a regional hegemon in one part of Eurasia or another, and for two key elements of the U.S.-led international order that has operated since World War II—the non-use of force or coercion as a means of settling disputes between countries, and freedom of the seas.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Studies Quarterly Summer 2021 Vol 15, No. 2
    SUMMER 2021 Vol. 15, No. 2 Civil- Military Relations: “What Does It Mean?” Martin E. Dempsey FEATURE ARTICLE CMR in the United States: What Senior Leaders Need to Know (and Usually Don’t) Peter D. Feaver Richard H. Kohn The Line Held: CMR in the Trump Administration Kori Schake An “Unprincipled Principal”: Implications for Civil- Military Relations Pauline Shanks Kaurin Through the Looking Glass: Trump- Era CMR in Comparative Perspective Risa Brooks Maximum Toxicity: Civil- Military Relations in the Trump Era Mackubin Thomas Owens Trump’s Generals: A Natural Experiment in Civil- Military Relations James Joyner ONLINE ONLY Uncivil-Military Relations: Politicization of the Military in the Trump Era Jim Golby Strategic Studies SSQ Quarterly Chief of Staff, US Air Force Gen Charles Q. Brown, Jr., USAF Chief of Space Operations, US Space Force Gen John W. Raymond, USSF Commander, Air Education and Training Command Lt Gen Marshall B. Webb, USAF Commander and President, Air University Lt Gen James B. Hecker, USAF Director, Academic Services Mehmed Ali, PhD Director, Air University Press Maj Richard T. Harrison, USAF Guest Editor Dr. Jim Golby Managing Editor Print Specialist Illustrator Jeanne K. Shamburger Megan N. Hoehn Daniel M. Armstrong Advisers Contributing Editors Gen Michael P. C. Carns, USAF, Retired David C. Benson, PhD James W. Forsyth, PhD Mark J. Conversino, PhD Christina Goulter, PhD Kelly A. Grieco, PhD Christopher J. Bowie, PhD Michael R. Kraig, PhD Jay P. Kesan, PhD Dawn C. Murphy, PhD Charlotte Ku, PhD David D. Palkki, PhD Martin C. Libicki, PhD Nicholas M. Sambaluk, PhD Wendy Whitman Cobb, PhD https://www.af.mil/ https://www.spaceforce.mil/ https://www.aetc.af.mil/ https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/ Strategic Studies Quarterly An Air Force–Sponsored Strategic Forum on National and International Security SUMMER 2021 VOL.
    [Show full text]