DOCSLIB.ORG

Institutional Strengthening of the Committee for Water Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ministry of Agriculture Committee for Water Resources REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN Asian Development Bank TA № 4484 KAZ Institutional Strengthening of the Committee for Water Resources DRAFT FIN AL REPORT 12 October 2005 prepared by Fritz Schwaiger Zhana Zaitseva Valery Torubara Gulnar Tulebayeva Igor Petrakov Galina Blinova Dauren Kassabekov ADB – Republic of Kazakhstan Institutional Strengthening of the Committee for Water Resources Draft Final Report Rate of Exchange (12.09.2005) Currency unit = Tenge (Т) Tenge 1,00 = $0,0074 $ 1,00 = 135,00 Tenge List of Acronyms and Terms ADB - Asian Development Bank Akim - Head of rural, regional government Akimat - Rural, regional government AMC - Antimonopoly Committee AWC - Association of Water Consumers BR - Building Regulations BWO - Basin-water Organizations BWCD - Basin-water Control Departments CAEC - Central Asian Economic Community CAR - Central Asian Region CEP - Caspian Ecological program CIS - Commonwealth of Independent States CWR - Committee for Water Resources of the Ministry of Agriculture EA - Executive Agency EBRD - European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ESEI - Evaluation of Side Environmental Impact FSU - Former Soviet Union GDP - Gross domestic product GEF - Global economic fund GIS - Geo-information systems GWC - Group of Water Consumers GWP - Group water-pipe ICSD - Intergovernmental Commission for Sustainable Development ICWC - Intergovernmental Coordinating Waterworks Commission IDB - Islam Development Bank IFAS - International Fund for Aral saving IWRM - International Water Resources Management JSC - Joint-stock company Kolkhoz - Cooperative farm (attached to FSU) MA - Ministry of Agriculture Maslikhat - Local legislative body MEBP - Ministry of Economy and Budget Planning MEMR - Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources MEP - Ministry of Environment Preservation MES - Ministry of Education and Sciences MF - Ministry of Finance MH - Ministry of Health MIT - Ministry of Industry and Trade MM - Mass Media MPC - Maximum permissible concentration MPD - Maximum permissible discharge 2 ADB – Republic of Kazakhstan Institutional Strengthening of the Committee for Water Resources Draft Final Report NGO - Nongovernmental organization NPEPA - National Program for Environment Preservation Activities Oblast - Regional Administrative Area (province) OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Okrug - Group of Inhabited locality OM - Operation and Maintenance OSCE - Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe PA - Public Association PC - Public Corporation PI - Planning Institute RAPEP - Regional Action Plan for Environment Preservation REC - Regional Ecological Center Region - Region Administrative Area RF - Russian Federation RIL - Rural inhabited locality RK - Republic of Kazakhstan RPE - Republican Public Enterprise RS - Requirements specification SAO - Society of apartments owners SC - Sanitation service of MH SCDA - Short-term consulting development assistance Sovkhoz - Public farm (attached to FSU) SPDW - Sectoral Program “Drinking Water” SPRZD - State program of rural zones development STTA - Short-term Technical Assistance TA - Technical Assistance TEG - Technical and Economic Grounds UNDP - United Nations Development Program UNO - United Nations Organization USA - United States of America VAT - Value added tax Vodokanal - Water Industry and Sewerage Enterprise WB - World Bank WHO - World Health Organization WR - Water resources WSS - Water supply and sanitation 3 ADB – Republic of Kazakhstan Institutional Strengthening of the Committee for Water Resources Draft Final Report Table of Contents 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................... 8 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 21 1.1 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................ 21 1.2 OBJECTIVES........................................................................................... 22 1.3 SCOPE OF WORKS................................................................................... 22 1.3.1 Original .......................................................................................... 22 1.3.2 Agreed Revision ............................................................................ 23 1.4 PROJECT TEAM AND STTA ACTIVITIES..................................................... 23 1.5 DATA SOURCE ........................................................................................ 24 1.6 GRATITUDE ............................................................................................ 24 2 COUNTRY PROFILE AND SECTOR INFORMATION ............................... 26 2.1 COUNTRY PROFILE ................................................................................. 26 2.1.1 Geographical Location and Topography ....................................... 26 2.1.2 Climate and Vegetation ................................................................. 27 2.1.3 Social and Economic Development............................................... 28 2.1.4 State Governance and Institutions ................................................ 32 2.2 THE WATER SECTOR OF KAZAKHSTAN...................................................... 35 2.2.1 Historic Development .................................................................... 35 2.2.2 Water Resources........................................................................... 37 2.2.3 Problems in the Water Sector........................................................ 41 3 WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN ...................... 45 3.1 ORGANIZATIONS IN CHARGE.................................................................... 45 3.1.1 Legal Background.......................................................................... 45 3.1.2 Basic principles of public administration regarding use and protection of water resources (Article 34, Water Code of RK) ..................... 45 3.1.3 Main tasks of public administration regarding use and protection of water resources in accordance with the existing legislation (Article 35, Water Code of RK): ................................................................................................ 47 3.1.4 Responsibilities of the Government regarding use and protection of water resources (Article 36, Water Code of RK):......................................... 48 3.1.5 Responsibility of the authorized body (CWR of MoA) regarding use and protection of water resources (Article 37, Water Code of RK) .............. 49 3.1.6 Responsibilities of Basin Water Departments regarding use and protection of water resources (Article 40, Water Code of RK) ..................... 50 3.1.7 Local representative (maslikhats) and executive (akimats) bodies administration of water issues...................................................................... 52 3.1.8 Basin Council and Basin Agreement............................................. 52 4 ADB – Republic of Kazakhstan Institutional Strengthening of the Committee for Water Resources Draft Final Report 3.1.9 Levels of Water Body Administration............................................. 53 3.2 PRINCIPLES OF WATER RESOURCES AND WATER USE MANAGEMENT ........ 54 3.2.1 Basic Principles ............................................................................. 54 3.2.2 Sustainability Criteria..................................................................... 55 3.2.3 Agenda 21 ..................................................................................... 56 3.2.4 Proposed Water Policy Objectives ................................................ 56 3.2.5 Requirements for Implementation ................................................. 61 3.3 APPLICATION OF IWRM AS A SHOW CASE ON IRTYSH RIVER.................... 61 3.3.1 Why the Irtysh River? .................................................................... 61 3.3.2 Multilevel Management Systems................................................... 61 3.3.3 Transboundary issues ................................................................... 63 3.3.4 Required Institutional and Organizational Arrangements .............. 65 3.3.5 Social aspects, stakeholder involvement, awareness building...... 66 3.3.6 Organizational issues .................................................................... 67 3.4 REVIEW OF CURRENT WATER TARIFFING POLICY ..................................... 67 3.4.1 Tariff setting procedure.................................................................. 67 3.4.2 Tariff Calculation Methodology...................................................... 68 3.4.3 The Situation of Vodokanals.......................................................... 72 3.4.4 Shortcomings of Current Tariff Setting Methodology..................... 74 3.4.5 A Possible Mechanism for Setting Tariffs Right ............................ 74 3.5 INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO THE WATER SECTOR OF KAZAKHSTAN .... 75 4 INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY OF THE CWR .............................................. 77 4.1 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE OF CWR.................................................. 77 4.1.1 The Management .......................................................................... 77 4.1.2 Departments.................................................................................. 82 4.2 CWR FUNCTIONS................................................................................... 82 4.2.1 CWR Head Quarters ....................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    PLATINUM The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles online OPEN ACCESS every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) SMALL WILD CATS SPECIAL ISSUE Short Communication Insights into the feeding ecology of and threats to Sand Cat Felis margarita Loche, 1858 (Mammalia: Carnivora: Felidae) in the Kyzylkum Desert, Uzbekistan Alex Leigh Brighten & Robert John Burnside 12 March 2019 | Vol. 11 | No. 4 | Pages: 13492–13496 DOI: 10.11609/jot.4445.11.4.13492-13496 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies, and Guidelines visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the partners. The journal, the publisher, the host, and the part- Publisher & Host ners are not responsible for the accuracy of the politcal boundaries shown in the maps by the authors.
  • Achieving Ecosystem Stability of Degraded Land in Karakalpakstan and Kyzylkum Desert

    Achieving Ecosystem Stability of Degraded Land in Karakalpakstan and Kyzylkum Desert

    United Nations Development Programme/Global Environment Facility Government of Uzbekistan Achieving Ecosystem Stability of Degraded Land in Karakalpakstan and Kyzylkum Desert PIMS 3148 Project Final Evaluation Report Max Kasparek Tulkin Radjabov November 2012 Acknowledgements We would like to thank the staff and other people connected with the Ecosystem Stability Project who provid‐ ed a very constructive atmosphere during the final evaluation, which was carried out in a highly collegial spirit throughout. The project team gave us free access to all necessary information and facilitated meetings with the relevant people. We liked in particular the inspiring and sometimes controversial discussions. We wish to thank in particular the UNDP Country Office (Energy and Environment Programme), the Project Manager and all pro‐ ject staff and experts, the members of the Project Steering Committee and the partners in the Ministry of Agri‐ culture and other governmental agencies. The full support of the project team made it possible to conduct the tight travel schedule with a full meeting programme. Our sincerest thanks are also due to local stakeholders for providing information and for their great hospitality! Max Kasparek &Tulkin Radjabov Project Executing Partners Executing Agency: Forestry Department of the Ministry of Agriculture and Water Resources of the Government of Uzbekistan Principal Participating Academy of Sciences, Goskomzem, the Uzbekistan Hydrometeorological Partners: Service, and the State Committee for Nature Protection GEF Implementing Agency: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Evaluation Responsibility This Final Evaluation is undertaken by the UNDP Country Office (Energy & Environment Programme) in Uzbeki‐ stan in liaison with the UNDP Bratislava Regional Centre as the GEF Implementing Agency for this project.
  • 6. Current Status of the Environment

    6. Current Status of the Environment

    6. Current Status of the Environment 6.1. Natural Environment 6.1.1. Desertification Kazakhstan has more deserts within its territory than any other Central Asian country, and approximately 66% of the national land is vulnerable to desertification in various degrees. Desertification is expanding under the influence of natural and artificial factors, and some people, called “environmental refugees,” are obliged to leave their settlements due to worsened living environments. In addition, the Government of RK (Republic of Kazakhstan) issued an alarm in the “Environmental Security Concept of the Republic of Kazakhstan 2004-2015” that the crisis of desertification is not only confined to Kazakhstan but could raise problems such as border-crossing emigration caused by the rise of sandstorms as well as the transfer of pollutants to distant locations driven by large air masses. (1) Major factors for desertification Desertification is taking place due to the artificial factors listed below as well as climate, topographic and other natural factors. • Accumulated industrial wastes after extraction of mineral resources and construction of roads, pipelines and other structures • Intensive grazing of livestock (overgrazing) • Lack of farming technology • Regulated runoff to rivers • Destruction of forests 1) Extraction of mineral resources Wastes accumulated after extraction of mineral resources have serious effects on the land. Exploration for oil and natural gas requires vast areas of land reaching as much as 17 million hectares for construction of transportation systems, approximately 10 million hectares of which is reportedly suffering ecosystem degradation. 2) Overgrazing Overgrazing is the abuse of pastures by increasing numbers of livestock. In the grazing lands in mountainous areas for example, the area allocated to each sheep for grazing is 0.5 hectares, compared to the typical grazing space of 2 to 4 hectares per sheep.
  • 'Li1 Cons T T'u(;Ti:;;N Pliillfling \}Nd M,,!Ni Tilt In; I~ ,R Thr.. Ng',;,; ,;1 Va R :;,Ida

    'Li1 Cons T T'u(;Ti:;;N Pliillfling \}Nd M,,!Ni Tilt In; I~ ,R Thr.. Ng',;,; ,;1 Va R :;,Ida

    f CRITICAL PATH PLANNING RALPH J. STmPHlIlNSON. P. E. /" / " OOl'l"lIVX4'ING ENGINEER // • LAND PLANNING 115064 WARWICK ROAD • MANAGEMENT CONSULTING DETROIT. MICHIGAN 48223 PHONE 273·15026 • PL.ANT L.OCATION ~UcUmbDr 23, 197~ l'lr. L"l~ G•. h\1,'l, r ;,1 r P'\I • lCluia C. ,',,'Qstane tOS('ClJltcn'J ... ' ......... 2g42~1 '. i\iL: \L<'.ld Liv"ni"t i;i.L~hig:n 4S1~2 i\~:: rovie;Lm ~f I;J~JLm'Jl n;~t. .. !.;r:, l'1umJUing, ;'if;nnJ..ng i41d moniti:Jrill€J ~,~)r\1i[:rit'i dll :;Jv'''c',"i:l'0 atoot.i:d.hic !i05;,itctl, Trenl:.on, ; ilci1igi.'li1 In m;cord;~!l1:;13 ~'1th ;;,.\.Ir r ljCWlt. ':'if:>::I.F,t$icn:'.·, ~.lUtlln<JJ b!:!llow i~ ;, pHHJoead jJhln ;,$ to h~~lJ I S,Ug.ji"i!it I:ry ';I',rus5irmrll s~zvics:, Oli ~::'\.Jvid[jd in t.he cons t t'u(;ti:;;n pliillflinG \}nd m,,!ni tilt in; I~_,r thr.. nG',;,; ,;1 va r :;,ida ;..;ft;t{:fO;,:..:;thic Hos;,itbl.~$ 1 undcrt;tBl1d it, Lim proJr.lct i.:~n::i16t'~ of .t now builaing tel be ,:nnotru;;t>.Jd, ,~xl;'d:Jng lit.i85 1.0 bc rOf:lcloallud, and "ali) site- IJor,,, t.:l Oil C.A·Ui;tl."Uctt~'.l !';u.4:t'cun!in;; tilL ::Jxi~tin;; one now f.;!cilitiQ~. It is {qntici,)t'lt.otJ prl':"ently th:t Uk" proJt;ct. wUl ttqu!r.:: fr;JlU 22 t.o 27 months to t;uil d frl:m thll I;.ir.n; (;·>nt.; ;J\; ts n: lut.
  • Secondary Education in Kazakhstan

    Secondary Education in Kazakhstan

    Reviews of National Policies for Education Reviews of Secondary Education in Kazakhstan This is the first OECD review of policies for secondary education in Kazakhstan. N Reviews of National Policies for Education This report evaluates the education reform agenda of Kazakhstan – its feasibility and ational Policies for Education focus – by taking stock of present-day strengths and weaknesses. It provides guidance on adjusting reform implementation plans in line with international experiences and best Secondary Education practices. This review also consolidates much of the previously dispersed (national) data on primary and secondary schools in Kazakhstan into a common analytical base of evidence. in Kazakhstan Contents Executive summary Chapter 1. Overview of the education system of Kazakhstan Chapter 2. Equity and effectiveness of schooling in Kazakhstan Chapter 3. Assessment of learning outcomes and teaching quality in Kazakhstan Chapter 4. Good policies for better teachers and school leadership in Kazakhstan Chapter 5. Education expenditure and financing mechanisms in Kazakhstan Chapter 6. Vocational education and training in Kazakhstan Chapter 7. Recommendations of the OECD review of secondary education in Kazakhstan S econdary Education in Kazakhstan Consult this publication on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264205208-en. This work is published on the OECD iLibrary, which gathers all OECD books, periodicals and statistical databases. Visit www.oecd-ilibrary.org for more information. ISBN 978-92-64-20521-5 91 2013 06 1 P 9HSTCQE*cafcbf+ Reviews of National Policies for Education Secondary Education in Kazakhstan This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries.
  • Journal of Threatened Taxa

    Journal of Threatened Taxa

    PLATINUM The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles online OPEN ACCESS every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) SMALL WILD CATS SPECIAL ISSUE Communication The Caracal Caracal caracal Schreber, 1776 (Mammalia: Carnivora: Felidae) in Uzbekistan Mariya Alexeevna Gritsina 12 March 2019 | Vol. 11 | No. 4 | Pages: 13470–13477 DOI: 10.11609/jot.4375.11.4.13470-13477 For Focus, Scope, Aims, Policies, and Guidelines visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0 For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions#onlineSubmissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/editorialPolicies#custom-2 For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the partners. The journal, the publisher, the
  • Water Management in Kazakhstan

    Water Management in Kazakhstan

    Industry Report WATER MANAGEMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN OFFICIAL PROGRAM INDUSTRY REPORT WATER MANAGEMENT IN KAZAKHSTAN Date: April 2017 Language: English Number of pages: 27 Author: Mr. Marat Shibutov Other sectorial Reports: Are you interested in other Reports for other sectors and countries? Please find more Reports here: s-ge.com/reports DISCLAIMER The information in this report were gathered and researched from sources believed to be reliable and are written in good faith. Switzerland Global Enterprise and its network partners cannot be held liable for data, which might not be complete, accurate or up-to-date; nor for data which are from internet pages/sources on which Switzerland Global Enterprise or its network partners do not have any influence. The information in this report do not have a legal or juridical character, unless specifically noted. Contents 5.2. State and Government Programmes _________ 19 1. FOREWORD____________________________ 4 5.3. Recommended Technologies and Technology 2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY __________________ 5 Suppliers ___________________________ 21 2.1. Current Situation with Water Resources _______ 5 6. PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN WATER 2.1.1. General Situation ______________________ 5 RESOURCES __________________________ 23 2.1.2. Stream Flow Situation ___________________ 5 2.1.2.1. Main Basins __________________________ 6 6.1. Prospects in the sphere of hydraulic engineering 2.1.2.2. Minor Basins _________________________ 6 structures __________________________ 23 6.2. Prospects in Agriculture _________________ 24 2.2. Myths and Real Water Situation ____________ 8 6.3. Prospects in the housing and utility sector _____ 24 2.2.1. Need for Canals________________________ 8 6.4. Prospects in Industry ___________________ 24 2.2.2.
  • 43439-033: Zhetybai-Zhanaozen Road Section (Km 0-73) Initial

    43439-033: Zhetybai-Zhanaozen Road Section (Km 0-73) Initial

    Initial Environmental Assessment Project Number: 43439-033 Second draft 15 May 2015 Kazakhstan: CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections) Investment Program, Project 2 [Zhetybai- Zhanaozen Road Section (Km 0–73)] Prepared by Committee of Roads under the Ministry of Investments and Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan This initial environmental assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT KAZ: CAREC CORRIDOR 2 (MANGISTAU OBLAST SECTION) ZHETYBAI-ZHANAOZEN 0-73 KM Content ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 7 EXECTUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................17 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................................................17
  • Diversity of Ecological Conditions of the Kyzylkum Desert with Pasture Phytomelioration

    Diversity of Ecological Conditions of the Kyzylkum Desert with Pasture Phytomelioration

    European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol. 8 No. 10, 2020 ISSN 2056-5852 DIVERSITY OF ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF THE KYZYLKUM DESERT WITH PASTURE PHYTOMELIORATION Ortikova Lola Soatovna - Doctor of Physical and Chemical Sciences (PhD). Biology teacher Esankulova Dilbar Saitovna- Biology teacher Soliyeva Gulnoza Daniyarovna- Biology teacher Ibragimov Ilkhom Erkinovich -trainee teacher. Department of Methodology for Teaching Biology. Jizzakh State Pedagogical Institute UZBEKISTAN ABSTRACT The Kyzylkum desert is a large and promising region of karakul breeding in Central Asia due to the need to carry out phytomeliorative measures on its pastures. Most of Kyzylkum is a flat plateau and low-lying clay plains. Plain plateaus are based on chalk rocks covered with a mantle of newest sand and gravel sediments. With regard to this region of karakul breeding with various soil and climatic conditions, hydrogeological and pasture-fodder conditions, the development of scientific and technological foundations for phytomelioration of pastures needs a differentiated approach, taking into account the specifics of specific environmental conditions. It is the zonal approach that provides for the prudent mobilization of natural resources of the environment and can be the key to successfully solving an important problem. Keywords: Kyzylkum, pastures, karakul breeding, salinization, phytomelioration, desert, halophytes, ecology. INTRODUCTION, LITERATURE REVIEW AND DISCUSSION Kyzylkum, more often known in the geographical and botanical literature as the Kyzylkum district, is a large karakul region in terms of its area and national economic significance. It occupies most of the flat territory of Uzbekistan and southern Kazakhstan with elevation marks of 100-300 (700) meters above sea level and is located between the Amu Darya and Syrdarya rivers, the lower and middle reaches of the Zarafshan (Fig.
  • Sosyal, Beşeri Ve İdari Bilimler Alanında Yeni Ufuklar

    Sosyal, Beşeri Ve İdari Bilimler Alanında Yeni Ufuklar

    Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler-4 Alanında Yeni Ufuklar İmtiyaz Sahibi / Publisher • Gece Kitaplığı Genel Yayın Yönetmeni / Editor in Chief • Doç. Dr. Atilla ATİK Editörler/Editors • Prof. Dr. Sinan SÖNMEZ, Dr. Ertan ÖZÇOBAN , Dr. Dursun BALKAN, Dr. Hüseyin KARAKUŞ Kapak & İç Tasarım / Cover & Interior Design • Didem S. KORKUT Sosyal Medya / Social Media • Arzu Betül ÇUHACIOĞLU Birinci Basım / First Edition • ©EKİM 2019 ISBN • 978-605-7749-97-0 © copyright Bu kitabın yayın hakkı Gece Kitaplığı’na aittir. Kaynak gösterilmeden alıntı yapılamaz, izin almadan hiçbir yolla çoğaltılamaz. Gece Akademi Gece Kitaplığının yan kuruluşudur. The right to publish this book belongs to Gece Kitaplığı. Citation can not be shown without the source, reproduced in any way without permission. Gece Kitaplığı / Gece Publishing ABD Adres/ USA Address: 387 Park Avenue South, 5th Floor, New York, 10016, USA Telefon / Phone: +1 347 355 10 70 Türkiye Adres / Turkey Address: Kızılay Mah. Fevzi Çakmak 1. Sokak Ümit Apt. No: 22/A Çankaya / Ankara / TR Telefon / Phone: +90 312 384 80 40 +90 555 888 24 26 web: www.gecekitapligi.com e-mail: [email protected] Baskı & Cilt / Printing & Volume Sertifika / Certificate No:29377 Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler-4 Alanında Yeni Ufuklar İÇİNDEKİLER BÖLÜM 1 YIKICI LİDERLİĞİN İŞ GÖREN MOTİVASYONUNA ETKİSİNİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BANKACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA Ramazan Vedat SÖNMEZ ................................................................... 9 BÖLÜM 2 JAMES G. MARCH: YÖNETİM VE ÖRGÜT ÇALIŞMALARINDA ÖRNEK BİR FİGÜR Hasan SERİN, Muhammet DURGUN, Sadegül DURGUN ........... 29 BÖLÜM 3 19. YÜZYILDA VE 20. YÜZYILIN BAŞINDA KAZAK TÜRKLERİNDE FAKİRLEŞEN KESİMLER Gülnar KARA .................................................................................... 51 BÖLÜM 4 DİJİTAL DÖNÜŞÜMDE RİSK ODAKLI İÇ DENETİM Neşegül PARLAK ............................................................................. 75 BÖLÜM 5 ÜRETİM-İSTİHDAM İLİŞKİSİ: SEKTÖREL ANALİZ Zehra ABDİOĞLU, Sertap Çağla ŞEREF ........................................
  • Anastassiya Lineitseva Regional Center of Hydrology Kazakhstan

    Anastassiya Lineitseva Regional Center of Hydrology Kazakhstan

    Anastassiya Lineitseva Regional Center of Hydrology Kazakhstan 27-29 sep 2011, Porto, Portugal KazakhstanKazakhstan The Republic of Kazakhstan is located in Eurasia and ranked as the ninth largest country in the world. It is also ranked the world's largest landlocked country, its territory of 2,727,300 km². It is neighbored clockwise by Russia, China, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and also borders on a significant part of the Caspian Sea. TheThe ClimateClimate ofof KazakhstanKazakhstan The climate of Kazakhstan is typically continental, with cold dry winters and hot dry summers. Precipitation varies between arid and semi-arid conditions. Deserts and steppes account for more than 80 % of the total area. The continental climate is also characterized by its high evaporation level, which, together with the low rainfall, makes irrigation a necessity in large parts of the country, notably in the south. WaterWater ResourcesResources ofof KazakhstanKazakhstan The Republic of Kazakhstan is relatively poor in water resources, which non-uniformly distributed on territory The fresh water deficit is the most significant environmental problem making difficult sustainable development of Kazakhstan. The total water river resources in the year with an average water content make 109 km3 , and only 58,9 km3 of them is a local resources, but 48,9 km3 is a transboundary resources. HydroeconomicHydroeconomic BasinsBasins ofof KazakhstanKazakhstan Kazakhstan is divided on 8 Hydroeconomic basins : Aral-Syrdarynsky, Ural-Kaspysky, Ishimsky, Nura-Sarysuisky,
  • Transboundary Air Mass Transport from Kyzylkum Desert

    Transboundary Air Mass Transport from Kyzylkum Desert

    E3S Web of Conferences 99, 02014 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199902014 CADUC 2019 Transboundary air mass transport from Kyzylkum desert Karim Shukurov1,*, and Otto Chkhetiani1, 2 1A. M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119017, Pyzhevsky per., 3, Moscow, Russia 2Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Profsoyuznaya str., 84, Moscow, Russia Abstract. The NOAA HYSPLIT_4 trajectory model and the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis have calculated the trajectories of air particles transport from the Kyzylkum desert (Central Asia). The average annual and seasonal (winter, spring, summer and autumn) was calculated for the probability of transport to different remote regions. The probability of transport only to the mixed layer was calculated. The peculiarities of large-scale atmospheric circulation are analyzed that facilitate the transport of air masses from the Kyzylkum desert to some regions of Russia and the south of Iran. 1 Introduction The sand deserts of Central Asia release a large amount NCEP/NCAR reanalysis [13]. Air parcels started once of fine and coarse aerosols to the atmosphere [1, 2], every 24 hours in 1948-2017 at an altitude of 100 m which affects the quality of the habitat and the radiation above the nameless point (43° N, 63° E) in the characteristics of the atmosphere of the states of this Kyzylkum desert near the border of Kazakhstan and region. The uplift of arid aerosols from the surface of the Uzbekistan. The probability of transport of the air sandy desert occurs as a result of wind or vortex particle, Pij [%], to the column of the atmosphere above exposure [3-5].