Secondary Education in Kazakhstan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Secondary Education in Kazakhstan Reviews of National Policies for Education Reviews of Secondary Education in Kazakhstan This is the first OECD review of policies for secondary education in Kazakhstan. N Reviews of National Policies for Education This report evaluates the education reform agenda of Kazakhstan – its feasibility and ational Policies for Education focus – by taking stock of present-day strengths and weaknesses. It provides guidance on adjusting reform implementation plans in line with international experiences and best Secondary Education practices. This review also consolidates much of the previously dispersed (national) data on primary and secondary schools in Kazakhstan into a common analytical base of evidence. in Kazakhstan Contents Executive summary Chapter 1. Overview of the education system of Kazakhstan Chapter 2. Equity and effectiveness of schooling in Kazakhstan Chapter 3. Assessment of learning outcomes and teaching quality in Kazakhstan Chapter 4. Good policies for better teachers and school leadership in Kazakhstan Chapter 5. Education expenditure and financing mechanisms in Kazakhstan Chapter 6. Vocational education and training in Kazakhstan Chapter 7. Recommendations of the OECD review of secondary education in Kazakhstan S econdary Education in Kazakhstan Consult this publication on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264205208-en. This work is published on the OECD iLibrary, which gathers all OECD books, periodicals and statistical databases. Visit www.oecd-ilibrary.org for more information. ISBN 978-92-64-20521-5 91 2013 06 1 P 9HSTCQE*cafcbf+ Reviews of National Policies for Education Secondary Education in Kazakhstan This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Please cite this publication as: OECD (2014), Reviews of National Policies for Education: Secondary Education in Kazakhstan, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264205208-en ISBN 978-92-64-20521-5 (print) ISBN 978-92-64-20520-8 (PDF) Series: Reviews of National Policies for Education ISSN 1563-4914 (print) ISSN 1990-0198 (online) The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of international law. Photo credits: Cover © Anton Andronov/Fotolia.com. Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda. © OECD 2014 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of the source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d'exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]. FOREWORD – 3 Foreword This first OECD review of policies for secondary education in the Republic of Kazakhstan was requested by the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan as part of the process of deepening co-operation with the OECD in key areas of development, such as education. The purpose of the review is to evaluate the education reform agenda – its feasibility and focus – by taking stock of present-day strengths and weaknesses of the secondary education system of Kazakhstan. The review also seeks to provide, where needed and possible, guidance on adjusting the reform implementation plans in line with international experiences and best practices regarding educational change. An added value of this activity for both the authorities of Kazakhstan and the OECD is that during the preparation of this report, much of the previously dispersed (national) data on secondary schools in Kazakhstan has been consolidated into a common base of evidence, validated by the education authorities. Strengthening the reliability of evidence is a long process and this work can only be the first step. Nevertheless, it is already benefiting a number of follow-up activities with the Republic of Kazakhstan, such as the OECD Review of Policies to Improve the Effectiveness of Resource Use in Schools (carried out in co-operation with the World Bank), the OECD Review of Policies for Vocational Education and Training (Skills Beyond School), and the OECD Country Review of Early Childhood Education and Care. Chapter 1 of this report provides an overview of the country, its education system and reform plans. Subsequent chapters provide analysis of and recommendations on equity and effectiveness of schooling; assessment and evaluation practices; policies for teachers and principals; expenditure patterns and financing mechanisms; vocational education and training; and a summary of the recommendations. The report was prepared in the Directorate for Education and Skills by Mihaylo Milovanovitch (rapporteur and review team leader), José-Luis Alvarez-Galván (OECD Secretariat), Julie Bélanger (OECD Secretariat), Simone Bloem (OECD Secretariat), and Caroline Macready (independent education expert). Cassandra Davis, Célia Braga-Schich and Anne-Lise Prigent from the OECD Secretariat, and Ian Whitman (United States) REVIEWS OF NATIONAL POLICIES FOR EDUCATION: SECONDARY EDUCATION IN KAZAKHSTAN © OECD 2014 4 – FOREWORD provided editorial guidance and support for the production of this publication. The layout was prepared by Peter Vogelpoel. Brigitte Beyeler, Claire Chetcuti and Deborah Fernandez provided overall administrative support. Barbara Ischinger Director for Education and Skills OECD REVIEWS OF NATIONAL POLICIES FOR EDUCATION: SECONDARY EDUCATION IN KAZAKHSTAN © OECD 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS – 5 Acknowledgements The OECD review team wishes to thank the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan Mr Aslan Sarinzhipov and the staff of the Ministry, as well as the JSC “Information-Analytic Centre” (IAC) for their excellent co-operation during the review process. This report would not have been possible without the commitment and support of Professor Sholpan Kalanova, President of IAC at the time of carrying out the OECD review, Assem Satmukhambetova, head of the Secondary Education Department in IAC, Meruyert Kenzhetayeva, national co-ordinator for the background report and the site visits, as well as Saltanat Yunussova, Irina Burlak and Assylkhan Suyundikov from IAC. The OECD team also wishes to thank the analytical staff of IAC involved in the verification of data and information used in the report for their invaluable work. The report has also greatly benefited from the critical comments and suggestions of peer reviewers in the OECD Secretariat: Michael Davidson, Head of the Early Childhood and Schools Division (ECS) in the OECD Directorate for Education and Skills (EDU); Etienne Albiser, Analyst (EDU/ Policy Advice and Implementation Division-PAI); Hannah von Ahlefeld, Analyst (EDU/ECS); Alastair Blyth, independent consultant for the OECD Centre for Effective Learning Environments (CELE); Paulo Santiago, Senior Analyst (EDU/ECS); and Sophie Vayssettes, Analyst (EDU/ECS). Finally, the OECD review team wishes to thank all education professionals and stakeholders in Kazakhstan who gave their time to meet and talk to the review team during the site visits. REVIEWS OF NATIONAL POLICIES FOR EDUCATION: SECONDARY EDUCATION IN KAZAKHSTAN © OECD 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS – 7 Table of contents Acronyms �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 15 Executive summary �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 17 Chapter 1. Overview of the education system of Kazakhstan ����������������������������� 23 The education reform agenda in pre-university education ����������������������������������� 36 The OECD review: sources and the review process ����������������������������������������������41 Annex 1.A1. A note on the review process . 43 Annex 1.A2. Request for meetings submitted prior to the site-visits . 45 Annex 1.A3. Review framework ��������������������������������������������������������������������������� 48 Chapter 2. Equity and effectiveness of schooling in Kazakhstan ����������������������� 63 Access to education ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 64 Equality of educational opportunity ��������������������������������������������������������������������� 66 Annex 2.A. The hierarchy of thinking skills ��������������������������������������������������������111 Chapter 3. Assessment of learning outcomes and teaching quality in Kazakhstan ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������115 The aims and purposes of assessment ������������������������������������������������������������������116
Recommended publications
  • 43439-033: Zhetybai-Zhanaozen Road Section (Km 0-73) Initial
    Initial Environmental Assessment Project Number: 43439-033 Second draft 15 May 2015 Kazakhstan: CAREC Corridor 2 (Mangystau Oblast Sections) Investment Program, Project 2 [Zhetybai- Zhanaozen Road Section (Km 0–73)] Prepared by Committee of Roads under the Ministry of Investments and Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan This initial environmental assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT KAZ: CAREC CORRIDOR 2 (MANGISTAU OBLAST SECTION) ZHETYBAI-ZHANAOZEN 0-73 KM Content ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................... 7 EXECTUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................17 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Performance Reviews Kazakhstan
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS KAZAKHSTAN UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2000 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No. 8 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city of area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.01.II.E.3 ISBN 92-1-116770-1 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Preface The EPR project in Kazakhstan had originally started in September 1997, but had to be interrupted for organizational reasons. A second preparatory mission therefore had to be organized and took place in October 2000. It resulted in a new structure for the report, which was adapted to the many changes in the country that had occurred in the meantime. The review team for the project was constituted following these decisions and included national experts from Finland, France, Denmark, Germany, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Uzbekistan, together with the ECE secretariat, UNEP and the Bilthoven Division of the WHO European Centre for Environment and Health. The costs of the participation of experts from countries in transition, as well as the travel expenses of the ECE secretariat, were covered by extrabudgetary funds that had been made available from Finland, Germany and Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Strengthening of the Committee for Water Resources
    Ministry of Agriculture Committee for Water Resources REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN Asian Development Bank TA № 4484 KAZ Institutional Strengthening of the Committee for Water Resources DRAFT FIN AL REPORT 12 October 2005 prepared by Fritz Schwaiger Zhana Zaitseva Valery Torubara Gulnar Tulebayeva Igor Petrakov Galina Blinova Dauren Kassabekov ADB – Republic of Kazakhstan Institutional Strengthening of the Committee for Water Resources Draft Final Report Rate of Exchange (12.09.2005) Currency unit = Tenge (Т) Tenge 1,00 = $0,0074 $ 1,00 = 135,00 Tenge List of Acronyms and Terms ADB - Asian Development Bank Akim - Head of rural, regional government Akimat - Rural, regional government AMC - Antimonopoly Committee AWC - Association of Water Consumers BR - Building Regulations BWO - Basin-water Organizations BWCD - Basin-water Control Departments CAEC - Central Asian Economic Community CAR - Central Asian Region CEP - Caspian Ecological program CIS - Commonwealth of Independent States CWR - Committee for Water Resources of the Ministry of Agriculture EA - Executive Agency EBRD - European Bank for Reconstruction and Development ESEI - Evaluation of Side Environmental Impact FSU - Former Soviet Union GDP - Gross domestic product GEF - Global economic fund GIS - Geo-information systems GWC - Group of Water Consumers GWP - Group water-pipe ICSD - Intergovernmental Commission for Sustainable Development ICWC - Intergovernmental Coordinating Waterworks Commission IDB - Islam Development Bank IFAS - International Fund for Aral saving IWRM - International
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Reports on Emerging Ecological Issues in Central Asia
    ASSESSMENT REPORTS ON EMERGING ECOLOGICAL ISSUES IN CENTRAL ASIA Ashgabat Foreword In December 2006, five Central Asian countries established the Environment Convention as an important initiative for regional co- operation among the member states on sustainable development. The implementation of the Convention requires regular assessment of the state of the environment with a focus on emerging environ- mental issues. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) is mandated to regularly assess and monitor major environmental challenges and trends. The rapid socio-economic growth coupled with increase in intensity and frequency of natural disasters have brought many challenging emerging issues to the forefront. The emerging environmental issues are a threat to food security, water security, energy security and sustainable development. This assessment report on the emerging environmental issues in Central Asia is timely and meaningful to the Central Asian region. The report, the first of its kind in Central Asia, identifies key emerging en- vironmental issues in Central Asia – Atmospheric Brown Cloud, Dust Storms, Glacial Melt, Integrated Chemical Management and the Use of Alternative Energy Resources. These issues have been ana- lyzed based on sound science by various experts, including scientists, academics and civil society representatives, to determine their impact on environment and population. Based on the analysis the report identifies the gaps in the existing system to address the emerging environmental issues and provide clear recommendations to fill the gaps. I believe that this report will bring emerging environmental issues to the attention of different stake- holders including the general public. This report will also provide a sound basis for decision makers in Central Asian countries in addressing the emerging environmental issues at the policy level.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecotourism in Mangystau. a Survey of the European Consumer
    MARION DONHOFF WORKING PAPER 2019/20 Ecotourism in Mangystau. A survey of the European consumer IrinaApril 2020 Grigoryeva Ecotourism in Mangystau. A survey of the European consumer Imprint Succow Foundation partner in the Greifswald Mire Centre Ellernholzstrasse 1/3 D-17489 Greifswald Germany [email protected] http://www.succow-stiftung.de http://www.greifswaldmoor.de Cite as: Grigoryeva, I., 2020, Ecotourism in Mangystau. A survey of the European consumer, Marion Dönhoff Fellowship Working Paper, Michael Succow Foundation partner in the Greifswald mire Centre (self-published URL: https://www.succow- stiftung.de/fileadmin/Ablage/Projekte/Forschung_Weiterbildung/Grigoryeva_Irina_MD .pdf), "Disclaimer: This work had been carried out within a fellowship programme funded by Marion Dönhoff Foundation, implemented and supervised by Michael Succow Foundation The authors are fully responsible for the content of this working paper Marion Dönhoff Foundation has no liability." 2 Ecotourism in Mangystau. A survey of the European consumer About Irina Grigoryeva is a biologist (M.Sc.) from Kazakhstan. Her master's thesis dealt with the steppe marmot and its population in the Akmola and Karaganda areas in Kazakhstan. Her research was conducted using satellite images. Since her study, she works for the NGO Association of Conservation of Biodiversity of Kazakhstan (ACBK). During her Dönhoff Fellowship, she is focused on the development of ecotourism concepts in the Ustyurt Nature Reserve (IUCN Ia) and places around this reserve in Kazakhstan. Before coming to Greifswald, she already conducted investigations and discussions in the target area, on the basis of which she is now developing recommendations for tourist routes, other tourist infrastructure and information and communication materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakh Cultural Orientation
    1 Map of Kazakhstan 2 _Toc240267777Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 COUNTRY PROFILE 6 INTRODUCTION 6 AREA 6 GEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS AND FEATURES 7 NORTHERN STEPPES 7 SEMI-DESERTS AND DESERTS 7 THE CASPIAN DEPRESSION 7 MOUNTAINS OF THE EAST AND SOUTHEAST 8 CLIMATE 8 BODIES OF WATER 9 RIVERS 9 CASPIAN SEA 10 ARAL SEA 10 LAKE BALKHASH 11 MAJOR CITIES 11 ALMATY (ALMA-ATA) 11 ASTANA 12 SHYMKENT (CHIMKENT) 12 ATYRAU 12 HISTORY 13 ANCIENT HISTORY 13 THE MONGOLS 14 THE KAZAKHS 14 RUSSIAN EXPANSION 15 RUSSIAN ANNEXATION AND SETTLEMENT 16 EARLY SOVIET POLICY IN THE STEPPE 17 THE SOVIET ERA: POST-WORLD WAR II 17 THE DECLINE OF THE SOVIET UNION 18 INDEPENDENT KAZAKHSTAN 18 ECONOMY 20 INDUSTRY 20 AGRICULTURE 21 TRADE AND FOREIGN INVESTMENT 22 GOVERNMENT 22 MEDIA 23 ETHNIC GROUPS 24 LANGUAGES 25 CHAPTER 2 RELIGION 26 INTRODUCTION 26 FOLK RELIGION AND ISLAM 27 RELIGION AND THE STATE 29 RELIGION AND DAILY LIFE 30 RELIGIOUS HOLIDAYS 31 3 ORAZAI (RAMADAN) 31 URAZA BAIRAM (EID AL-FIDR) 31 QURBAN AIT (EID AL-ADHA) 31 MOSQUE ETIQUETTE 32 CHAPTER 3 TRADITIONS 33 INTRODUCTION 33 TRIBAL AND CLAN IDENTITY 33 GENDER ROLES AND RELATIONS 34 TRADITIONAL ECONOMY 35 GREETINGS AND COMMUNICATION 36 HOSPITALITY AND GIFT-GIVING 37 EATING AND DRINKING HABITS 38 TEA AND BREAD 38 MEALS 38 CUISINE 40 DRESS CODES 41 SOCIAL EVENTS 42 WEDDINGS 42 FUNERALS 44 NON-RELIGIOUS HOLIDAYS 45 PUBLIC HOLIDAYS 45 NAURYZ 45 DO’S AND DON’TS 47 CHAPTER 4 URBAN LIFE 48 INTRODUCTION 48 URBAN HOUSING 49 HEALTH CARE 50 TRANSPORTATION 50 TELECOMMUNICATIONS 52 RESTAURANTS AND DINING 53 MARKETPLACE 54 BEGGARS
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Natural Resources and Protection of Environment of the Republic of Kazakhstan
    MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN NATIONAL STRATEGY AND ACTION PLAN ON CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE USE OF BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN KOKSHETAU, 1999 2 “Kazakhstan should become a clean and green country with fresh air and transparent water…” The Strategy “Kazakhstan-2030” The Republic of Kazakhstan plays an important role in the case of biodiversity conserva- tion. It is the most vast Central Asian state located at the centre of Eurasia on the crossroad of an- cient historic caravan ways which linked Europe and Asia. The state has a huge potential of natu- ral resources that cased the great diversity of landscapes, ecological systems and species. Accu- mulated knowledge and rich experience of Kazakhstani researches let to develop the effective policy in this field. Biological diversity, as the rest of the natural components was mostly threatened due to such problems as drying up of the Aral Sea, nuclear tests during the forty years at the Soviet test- ing areas, and the practice of industrial and agricultural use. Despite the social and economic dif- ficulties of the transition period the way to ecologically safe and sustainable development is be- coming one of the priority directions of the development Strategy of the Republic of Kazakhstan at present time. Development of the National Strategy for implementation of the Convention goals is based on the “Strategy of the Republic of Kazakhstan Development until the Year 2030”, where priority goals and respective objectives have been clearly identified. We believe that the diversity of the animal and vegetable world that Kazakhstan possesses shall not be lost.
    [Show full text]
  • Geo-Data: the World Geographical Encyclopedia
    Geodata.book Page iv Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:25 AM GEO-DATA: THE WORLD GEOGRAPHICAL ENCYCLOPEDIA Project Editor Imaging and Multimedia Manufacturing John F. McCoy Randy Bassett, Christine O'Bryan, Barbara J. Nekita McKee Yarrow Editorial Mary Rose Bonk, Pamela A. Dear, Rachel J. Project Design Kain, Lynn U. Koch, Michael D. Lesniak, Nancy Cindy Baldwin, Tracey Rowens Matuszak, Michael T. Reade © 2002 by Gale. Gale is an imprint of The Gale For permission to use material from this prod- Since this page cannot legibly accommodate Group, Inc., a division of Thomson Learning, uct, submit your request via Web at http:// all copyright notices, the acknowledgements Inc. www.gale-edit.com/permissions, or you may constitute an extension of this copyright download our Permissions Request form and notice. Gale and Design™ and Thomson Learning™ submit your request by fax or mail to: are trademarks used herein under license. While every effort has been made to ensure Permissions Department the reliability of the information presented in For more information contact The Gale Group, Inc. this publication, The Gale Group, Inc. does The Gale Group, Inc. 27500 Drake Rd. not guarantee the accuracy of the data con- 27500 Drake Rd. Farmington Hills, MI 48331–3535 tained herein. The Gale Group, Inc. accepts no Farmington Hills, MI 48331–3535 Permissions Hotline: payment for listing; and inclusion in the pub- Or you can visit our Internet site at 248–699–8006 or 800–877–4253; ext. 8006 lication of any organization, agency, institu- http://www.gale.com Fax: 248–699–8074 or 800–762–4058 tion, publication, service, or individual does not imply endorsement of the editors or pub- ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Cover photographs reproduced by permission No part of this work covered by the copyright lisher.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Arid Ground up in Search of Water Constructions in BOMBAY BEACH the Salton Sea Area
    JOSHUA TREE LOS ANGELES Degree Project • 30 credits Landscape Architecture programme Alnarp 2015 PALM SPRINGS RANCHO MIRAGE INDIO from the arid ground up _in search of water constructions in BOMBAY BEACH the Salton Sea area SALTON Linn Stevensson CITY BORREGO SPIRNGS NILAND SAN DIEGO BRAWLEY Faculty of Landscape Architecture, Horticulture and Crop Production Science From the Arid Ground Up: In Search of Water Constructions in the Salton Sea Area Upp från den torra marken: Att leta efter Vattenkonstruktioner i Salton Sea området Linn Stevensson Supervisor: Lisa Diedrich, SLU, Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management Examiner: Andrea Kahn, SLU, Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management Co-examiner: Caroline Dahl, SLU, Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management Credits: 30 Project Level: A2E Course title: Master Project in Landscape Architecture Course code: EX0775 Subject: Landscape Architecture Programme: Landscape Architecture programme / Landskapsarkitektprogrammet Place of publication: Alnarp Year of publication: 2015 Cover art: Linn Stevensson Online publication: http://stud.epsilon.slu.se All photographs and illustrations by author unless otherwise stated Keywords: Anthropocene, Dry Land Design, Land Use, Site, Systemic Change, Deviant Transect, Transformation, Visionary Organizing SLU, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Landscape Architecture, Horticulture and Crop Production Science Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management Preface: Encounter with Arid Grounds IN THE LATE SUMMER OF 2014, I FOR THE FIRST TIME SET FOOT ON THE AMERICAN WEST COAST. A STRANGER TO THESE LANDS, SEEING PHOTOS, STUDYING MAPS, READING FACTS AND FICTION COULD IN NO WAY HAVE PREPARED ME FOR WHAT WAS TO COME DURING THIS FIRST ENCOUNTER WITH SOME OF THE GREAT AMERICAN DESERTS.
    [Show full text]
  • Central and North East Asia Report for Persistent Toxic
    United Nations Environment Programme Chemicals Central and North East Asia and North East Central Central and North East Asia REGIONAL REPORT Regionally RBA PTS REGIONAL REPORT Based Assessment of Persistent Available from: UNEP Chemicals 11-13, chemin des Anémones CH-1219 Châtelaine, GE Switzerland Phone : +41 22 917 1234 Fax : +41 22 797 3460 Substances E-mail: [email protected] December 2002 http://www.chem.unep.ch UNEP Chemicals is a part of UNEP's Technology, Industry and Printed at United Nations, Geneva Economics Division GE.03-00155–January 2003–500 UNEP/CHEMICALS/2003/7 Global Environment Facility UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME CHEMICALS RReeggiioonnaallllyy BBaasseedd AAsssseessssmmeenntt ooff PPeerrssiisstteenntt TTooxxiicc SSuubbssttaanncceess Afghanistan, China, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, South Korea, Japan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan CCEENNTTRRAALL AANNDD NNOORRTTHH EEAASSTT AASSIIAA RREEGGIIOONNAALL RREEPPOORRTT DECEMBER 2002 GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY This report was financed by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) through a global project with co- financing from the Governments of Australia, France, Sweden, Switzerland and the United States of America This publication is produced within the framework of the Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC) This publication is intended to serve as a guide. While the information provided is believed to be accurate, UNEP disclaim any responsibility for the possible inaccuracies or omissions and consequences, which may flow from them. UNEP nor any individual involved in the preparation of this report shall be liable for any injury, loss, damage or prejudice of any kind that may be caused by any persons who have acted based on their understanding of the information contained in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Top-Down Nationalism in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan
    Portland State University PDXScholar Geography Masters Research Papers Geography 2013 Top-Down Nationalism in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan Annie M. Scriven Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/geog_masterpapers Part of the Human Geography Commons, Nature and Society Relations Commons, and the Social Policy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Scriven, Annie M., "Top-Down Nationalism in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan" (2013). Geography Masters Research Papers. 15. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/geog_masterpapers/15 10.15760/geogmaster.15 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Geography Masters Research Papers by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Top-Down Nationalism in Post-Soviet Kazakhstan Annie M. Scriven Submitted for partial fulfillment of Master of Science degree in Geography Portland State University Approved by: _______________________________________________________ Martha Works _______________________________________________________ Heejun Chang, Department Chair Date: December 12, 2013 Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables i List of Acronyms ii Abstract iii 1. Top Down Nationalism in Post- Soviet Kazakhstan 1 2. Nationalism 2 - Modernism 3 - Ethno-Symbolism 5 - Post-Modernism 8 - Territoriality 8 3. Kazakhstan in Context 11 - Land Use and Population 14 - Natural Resources 18 - Environmental Degradation 20 - Aral Sea 20 - Semipalatinsk Test Site 21 4. Historical Background to Multi-Ethnicity 23 - Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 1920-1991 25 5. The Role of Language and Linguistic Policy in Shaping National Identity 28 - Language Laws 1987-2000 29 - The Effects of Language Policy 32 6.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS KAZAKHSTAN Second
    ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Committee on Environmental Policy ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE REVIEWS KAZAKHSTAN Second Review UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2008 Environmental Performance Reviews Series No 27 NOTE Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with fi gures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations or of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ECE/CEP/142 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No 08.II.E.11 ISBN 978-92-1-116989-8 ISSN 1020-4563 iii Foreword Environmental Performance Reviews (EPRs) for countries in transition were initiated by environment ministers at the Second Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” held in Lucerne, Switzerland, in 1993. As a result, the UNECE Committee on Environmental Policy decided to make the EPRs a part of its regular programme. The fi rst cycle of reviews began in 1994 and was carried out until 2004 in 23 countries of the UNECE region. In 2003, at the Fifth Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” (Kiev), the ministers reaffi rmed their support for the EPR Programme and decided that it should continue with a second round of reviews. This support was recently confi rmed at the Sixth Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” (Belgrade, 2007). The EPR Programme is considered an important instrument for countries with economies in transition.
    [Show full text]