14 Bull. Hist. Chem., VOLUME 37, Number 1 (2012) CONTRASTING MENTORS FOR ENGLISH- SPEAKING CHEMISTRY STUDENTS IN GERMANY IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY: LIEBIG, WÖHLER, AND BUNSEN (1) Paul R. Jones, University of Michigan,
[email protected] Introduction The situation, developing rapidly in Germany at mid-century, was far different. (2, 3). German chemists Aspiring chemists in America and Britain in the mid had themselves sought advanced training in Stockholm 1800s, having completed undergraduate training at col- under Berzelius or in Paris in Gay-Lussac’s laboratory, leges or universities in their native countries, needed to for example. Eilhard Mitscherlich, student at Göttingen search elsewhere to continue their training. Their instruc- with Stromeyer, and Friedrich Wöhler, holding a medical tion in chemistry at Harvard, Yale, Oxford, Cambridge, degree from Heidelberg under L. Gmelin, nevertheless and other institutions consisted of lectures, perhaps sought additional instruction under Berzelius’s tutelage embellished with some demonstrations; but students had and brought back to their native country the benefit of little or no access to laboratory facilities themselves, their their experiences, which shaped their future scientific exposure to the science being passive rather than active. careers. Justus von Liebig, awarded the D.Phil. at Er- Furthermore, the lectures were presented by professors langen under Kastner, and Robert Bunsen, a Stromeyer who, for the most part, were self-taught and had never student in Göttingen, ventured to Paris and worked in the ventured from their own roots, often holding positions laboratory of Gay-Lussac, 1832-1833. These individuals, in their own home academic institution. along with several others, then took positions at German Table 1.