Hood River Subbasin Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hood River Subbasin Plan Hood River Subbasin Plan Including Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries May 28, 2004 Submitted to the Northwest Power and Conservation Planning Council Writer/editor Holly Coccoli Hood River Soil and Water Conservation District List of Contributors Gary Asbride US Forest Service Chuti Fieldler, US Forest Service Catherine J. Flick, US Forest Service Bonnie Lamb, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Erik Olsen, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Phil Roger, Columbia Intertribal Fisheries Commission Alexis Vaivoda, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs of Oregon Mick Jennings, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs of Oregon Rod French, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildllife Table of Contents Page No. 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………..1 2. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………3 3. HOOD RIVER SUBBASIN ASSESSMENT……………………………………..7 Subbasin Overview…………………………………………………………..7 Focal Species Characterization and Status………………………………….23 Out of Subbasin Effects……………………………………………….….…67 Environment and Population Relationships……………………… ………71 Limiting Factors and Conditions……………………………………………91 Synthesis and Interpretation………………………………………………...94 4. LOWER OREGON COLUMBIA GORGE TRIBUTARIES ASSESSMENT…………………………………………………………………….101 Subbasin Overview…………………………………………………………101 Focal Species Characterization and Status…………………………………112 Out of Subbasin Effects……………………………………………………134 Environment and Population Relationships………………………………..135 Limiting Factors and Conditions…………………………………… ……141 Synthesis and Interpretation………………………………………… …….143 5. INVENTORY OF EXISTING ACTIVITIES …………………………….…….148 6. MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR HOOD RIVER SUBBASIN……………………175 Vision for the Subbasin…………………………………………………….176 Biological Objectives………………………………………………………178 Prioritized Strategies…………………………………………………… …190 Consistency with ESA and Clean Water Act Requirements…………… . 198 Research, Monitoring and Evaluation…………………………………… ..200 7. MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR LOWER OREGON COLUMBIA GORGE TRIBUTARIES………………………………………………….…….210 Vision for the Subbasin……………………………………………………..210 Biological Objectives…………………………………………………… …211 Prioritized Strategies………………………………………………………..214 Consistency with ESA and Clean Water Act Requirements…………… .…219 Research, Monitoring and Evaluation………………………………………220 References…………………………………………………………………..222 APPENDICES Appendix A- Maps Appendix B- Aquatic Supplement Appendix C- Wildlife Supplement List of Tables List of Figures List of Tables Table 1. Land ownership in the Hood River Subbasin Table 2. List of fish species present in the Hood River Subbasin. Table 3. Fish and wildlife species listed as threatened in the Hood River subbasin. Table 4. Selected wildlife species that are known to occur in the Hood River subbasin that are recognized as rare, uncommon and/or sensitive. Table 5. Focal species list and selection criteria for the Hood River Subbasin Table 6. Focal wildlife species in the Hood River Subbasin and associated IBIS vegetative land cover types. Table 7. Comparison of subbasin habitat production potential estimates from three different models to actual steelhead juvenile migrant trap data in the mainstem Hood River at river mile 4.5. Table 8. Comparison of subbasin habitat production potential estimates from three different models to actual chinook juvenile migrant trap data in the mainstem Hood River at river mile 4.5. Table 9. Current high lake stocking program in the Hood River subbasin. Table 10. Current target anadromous fish releases in the Hood River. Table 11. Historic releases of anadromous fish in Hood River subbasin streams. Table 12. Hatchery summer steelhead Columbia and Hood River harvest, 1996-2000. Table 13. Annual estimates of harvest rate on hatchery winter steelhead in the Hood River Table 14. Estimates of in-river sport catch of salmon and steelhead obtained from punch card returns. Table 15. Partial list of introduced non-native animal species in the Hood River subbasin Table 16. Current and historic land cover types for focal wildlife species in the Hood River Subbasin as indicated by the IBIS map data. Table 17. Mapped human travel corridors in the Hood River subbasin by 6 HUC watersheds. Table 18. EDT estimates of adult focal species population metrics based on current and template conditions in the Hood River Subbasin Table 19. EDT estimates of juvenile focal species population metrics based on current and template conditions in the Hood River Subbasin. Table 20. Summary of the primary limiting factors or key environmental correlates identified by EDT for focal species by life stage. Table 21. Current adult abundance (estimated by EDT) and the estimated percent increase in abundance for the 6 scenarios modeled for four focal species in the Hood River subbasin. Table 22. Current juvenile outmigrant abundance (estimated by EDT) and the estimated percent increase in abundance for the 6 scenarios modeled for four focal species in the Hood River subbasin. Table 23. Land ownership in the Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries Watershed Table 24. Streamflow regime by REO 2003 Sixth Hydrologic Unit Code subwatersheds. Table 25. Stream survey information with notes on barriers and flow regime Table 26. Fish and wildlife species designated as Threatened or Endangered inLower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries Watershed. Table 27. List of selected wildlife species considered rare or significant to the Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries Watershed. Table 28. Focal species list and selection criteria for the Lower Orgeon Columbia Gorge Tributaries watershed. Table 29. Focal wildlife species and land cover or subcover types in the Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries Table 30. Stream Habitat loss and changes in anadromous fish distribution due to human disturbance. Table 31. Lake stocking information for the Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries Watershed. Table 32. Average estimated recreational harvest of salmon and steelhead trout in Herman and Eagle creeks, 1976-1994. Table 33. Selected stream habitat survey information for major anadromous streams in the Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries watershed Table 34. Partial list of introduced non-native animal species in the Columbia Gorge Subbasin Table 35. Current and historic land cover or habitat types for focal species in the Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries watershed. Table 36. Human travel corridors in the Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries by 6 Level HUC watersheds Table 37. Assumptions about optimal habitat characteristics for steelhead and rainbow trout. Table 38. Overall percentage of land in each Land Protection Status category based on NWHI map layers and definitions Table 39. Instream water rights established by the State of Oregon in Hood River County. Table 40. Proposed hatchery and harvest strategies before/after Powerdale Dam removal scheduled in 2010 List of Figures Figure 1. Location of Hood River Subbasin in Oregon. Figure 2. Flow duration statistics for the Hood River based on daily discharges at U.S.G.S. Gage 14120000 Hood River at Tucker Bridge Figure 3. Stream segments where 1998 Oregon temperature standards are exceeded. Figure 4. Relation of the Hood Subbasin to the Columbia Gorge Province. Figure 5. Mt. Hood Recovery Bull Trout Recovery Unit within the Columbia River Distinct Population Segment. Figure 6. Number of adult hatchery and wild adult winter steelhead captured at Powerdale Dam for run years 1994-2001. Figure 7. Number of adult hatchery and wild adult summer steelhead captured at Powerdale Dam for run years 1992-2001. Figure 8. Number of adult hatchery and wild spring chinook captured at Powerdale Dam for run years 1992-2001. Figure 9. Adult bull trout captured in the Powerdale Dam trap for years 1992 to 2003. Figure 10. Annual counts of adult cutthroat trout captured at Powerdale Dam 1992-2004. Figure 11. Wild and hatchery winter steelhead adult return to Powerdale Dam Figure 12. Total harvest of spring chinook in the Hood River subbasin, including ocean and Columbia River harvest Figures 13-16. Relative Importance of Geographic Areas for Protection and Restoration Measures for Steelhead and Chinook focal species Figure 17. Hood River Summer Steelhead Protection and Restoration Strategic Priority Summary Figure 18. Hood River Winter Steelhead Protection and Restoration Strategic Priority Summary Figure 19. Hood River Spring Chinook Protection and Restoration Strategic Priority Summary Figure 20. Hood River Fall Chinook Protection and Restoration Strategic Priority Summary Figure 21. Number of steelhead smolts versus streamflow at Tucker Bridge during late summer and early fall rearing in the year prior to outmigration Figure 22. Relation of the Columbia Gorge Subbasin to the Columbia River Basin. Figure 23. Relation of the Lower Oregon Columbia Tributaries watershed to the Columbia Gorge Subbasin. 1. Executive Summary The Subbasin Plan defines fish and wildlife goals, objectives, and strategies for the Hood River Subbasin and the adjacent Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries for the next 10 to 15 years. The plan will be submitted to the Northwest Power Planning Council for adoption under the Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program. Its purpose is to help direct Bonneville Power Administration funding to projects that address fish and wildlife populations adversely impacted by the Columbia River hydropower system. The Subbasin Plan components are a 1) Assessment, or evaluation of current and historic biological and physical conditions; 2) Inventory of existing fish and wildlife programs and measures;
Recommended publications
  • Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mount Hood National Forest Recommendations for Policy Changes
    PROTECTING FRESHWATER RESOURCES ON MOUNT HOOD NATIONAL FOREST RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY CHANGES Produced by PACIFIC RIVERS COUNCIL Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mount Hood National Forest Pacific Rivers Council January 2013 Fisherman on the Salmon River Acknowledgements This report was produced by John Persell, in partnership with Bark and made possible by funding from The Bullitt Foundation and The Wilburforce Foundation. Pacific Rivers Council thanks the following for providing relevant data and literature, reviewing drafts of this paper, offering important discussions of issues, and otherwise supporting this project. Alex P. Brown, Bark Dale A. McCullough, Ph.D. Susan Jane Brown Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fisheries Commission Western Environmental Law Center G. Wayne Minshall, Ph.D. Lori Ann Burd, J.D. Professor Emeritus, Idaho State University Dennis Chaney, Friends of Mount Hood Lisa Moscinski, Gifford Pinchot Task Force Matthew Clark Thatch Moyle Patrick Davis Jonathan J. Rhodes, Planeto Azul Hydrology Rock Creek District Improvement Company Amelia Schlusser Richard Fitzgerald Pacific Rivers Council 2011 Legal Intern Pacific Rivers Council 2012 Legal Intern Olivia Schmidt, Bark Chris A. Frissell, Ph.D. Mary Scurlock, J.D. Doug Heiken, Oregon Wild Kimberly Swan Courtney Johnson, Crag Law Center Clackamas River Water Providers Clair Klock Steve Whitney, The Bullitt Foundation Klock Farm, Corbett, Oregon Thomas Wolf, Oregon Council Trout Unlimited Bronwen Wright, J.D. Pacific Rivers Council 317 SW Alder Street, Suite 900 Portland, OR 97204 503.228.3555 | 503.228.3556 fax [email protected] pacificrivers.org Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mt. Hood National Forest: 2 Recommendations for Policy Change Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Part One: Introduction—An Urban Forest 1 Part Two: Watersheds of Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries Watershed Assessment
    4. Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries Watershed Assessment 4.1 Subbasin Overview General Description Location and Size The Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries Watershed consists of the 19 small Columbia River tributaries located between Bonneville Dam and the Hood River. Its major streams are Herman and Eagle creeks. The watershed is located in Hood River County, except for a small part of the Eagle Creek drainage, and includes the City of Cascade Locks and part of the City of Hood River. The watershed covers a drainage area of 63,714 acres or 99.6 square miles. Geology Volcanic lava flows, glaciers, and flooding were the key forces forming the Columbia Gorge landscape of basalt cliffs, waterfalls, talus slopes and ridges. Land elevations rise rapidly from 72 feet above sea level to approximately 5,000 feet. Mt. Defiance is the highest peak at 4,960 feet. Landslides are the dominant erosional process in recent history (USFS, 1998). Debris torrents and ice and snow avalanches are not uncommon in the winter months. Alluvial fan deposits at the mouths of the steeper, more constricted creeks suggest the frequent routing of debris torrents down these channels. The lower mile or so of creeks have gradients of about 5 percent, rising steeply at middle elevations, with lower gradient channels in glaciated headwater valleys. Climate and Weather The watershed lies in the transition zone between the wet marine climate to the west and the dry continental climate to the east. Precipitation amounts vary dramatically from east to west and with elevation, ranging from 40 to 125 to inches annually.
    [Show full text]
  • The Columbia River Gorge: Its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway by IRA A
    VOLUMB 2 NUMBBI3 NOVBMBBR, 1916 . THE .MINERAL · RESOURCES OF OREGON ' PuLhaLed Monthly By The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology Mitchell Point tunnel and viaduct, Columbia River Hi~hway The .. Asenstrasse'' of America The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations Entered aa oeoond cl,... matter at Corvallis, Ore., on Feb. 10, l9lt, accordintt to tbe Act or Auc. :U, 1912. .,.,._ ;t ' OREGON BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY COMMISSION On1cm or THm Co><M188ION AND ExmBIT OREGON BUILDING, PORTLAND, OREGON Orncm or TBm DtBIICTOR CORVALLIS, OREGON .,~ 1 AMDJ WITHY COMBE, Governor HENDY M. PABKB, Director C OMMISSION ABTBUB M. SWARTLEY, Mining Engineer H. N. LAWRill:, Port.land IRA A. WILLIAMS, Geologist W. C. FELLOWS, Sumpter 1. F . REDDY, Grants Pass 1. L. WooD. Albany R. M. BIITT8, Cornucopia P. L. CAI<PBELL, Eugene W 1. KEBR. Corvallis ........ Volume 2 Number 3 ~f. November Issue {...j .· -~ of the MINERAL RESOURCES OF OREGON Published by The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology ~•, ;: · CONTAINING The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History l Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway t. By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations 1916 ILLUSTRATIONS Mitchell Point t unnel and v iaduct Beacon Rock from Columbia River (photo by Gifford & Prentiss) front cover Highway .. 72 Geologic map of Columbia river gorge. 3 Beacon Rock, near view . ....... 73 East P ortland and Mt. Hood . 1 3 Mt. Hamilton and Table mountain .. 75 Inclined volcanic ejecta, Mt. Tabor. 19 Eagle creek tuff-conglomerate west of Lava cliff along Sandy river.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Columbia River Highway: Oral History August 2009 6
    HHHIIISSSTTTOOORRRIIICCC CCCOOOLLLUUUMMMBBBIIIAAA RRRIIIVVVEEERRR HHHIIIGGGHHHWWWAAAYYY OOORRRAAALLL HHHIIISSSTTTOOORRRYYY FFFiiinnnaaalll RRReeepppooorrrttt SSSRRR 555000000---222666111 HISTORIC COLUMBIA RIVER HIGHWAY ORAL HISTORY Final Report SR 500-261 by Robert W. Hadlow, Ph.D., ODOT Senior Historian Amanda Joy Pietz, ODOT Research and Hannah Kullberg and Sara Morrissey, ODOT Interns Kristen Stallman, ODOT Scenic Area Coordinator Myra Sperley, ODOT Research Linda Dodds, Historian for Oregon Department of Transportation Research Section 200 Hawthorne Ave. SE, Suite B-240 Salem OR 97301-5192 August 2009 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. OR-RD-10-03 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Historic Columbia River Highway: Oral History August 2009 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Robert W. Hadlow, Ph.D., ODOT Senior Historian; Amanda Joy Pietz, ODOT Research; and Hannah Kullberg and Sara Morrissey, ODOT Interns ; Kristen Stallman, ODOT Scenic Area Coordinator; Myra Sperley, ODOT Research; and Linda Dodds, Historian 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Oregon Department of Transportation Research Section 11. Contract or Grant No. 200 Hawthorne Ave. SE, Suite B-240 Salem, OR 97301-5192 SR 500-261 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Oregon Department of Transportation Final Report Research Section 200 Hawthorne Ave. SE, Suite B-240 Salem, OR 97301-5192 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The Historic Columbia River Highway: Oral History Project compliments a larger effort in Oregon to reconnect abandoned sections of the Historic Columbia River Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • The Connected Systems of the Columbia River on the Oregon
    The Connected Systems of the Columbia River on the Oregon-Washington Border WASHINGTON The Columbia River, in its 309-mile course along the Oregon-Washington border, provides a rich and varied environment OREGON for the people, wildlife, and plants living and interacting there. The area’s geology is the basis for the landscape and ecosystems we know today. By deepening our understanding of interactions of Earth systems — geosphere, hydrosphere, atmosphere, and biosphere — Earth science helps us manage our greatest challenges and make the most of vital opportunities. ⑮ ⑥ ④ ⑬ ⑧ ⑪ ① ⑦ ② ③ What is a ⑭ ⑫ ⑤ connected system? ⑩ A connected system is a set of interacting components that directly or indirectly influence one another. The Earth system has four major components. The geosphere includes the crust and the interior of the planet. It contains all of the rocky parts of the planet, the processes that cause them to form, and the processes that have caused ⑨ them to change during Earth’s history. The parts can be as small 0 10 20 40 Miles ∆ N as a mineral grain or as large as the ocean floor. Some processes act slowly, like the gradual wearing away of cliffs by a river. Geosphere Others are more dramatic, like the violent release of gases and magma during a volcanic eruption. ① What is a geologic map? The fluid spheres are the liquid and gas parts of the Earth system. The atmosphere includes the mixture of gases that Geologic maps show what kinds of rocks and structures make up a landscape. surrounds the Earth. The hydrosphere includes the planet’s The geologic makeup of an area can strongly influence the kinds of soils, water water system.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE and PRECIPITATION of Hood River County
    1 WPG Document F4 PERS/Water/WPGRptClimPcpt CLIMATE AND PRECIPITATION of Hood River County by Hugh McMahan Water resources cannot be discussed or evaluated without an assessment and inventory of the input: the precipitation that falls on Hood River County. The amount and kind of precipitation are dictated by the interrelationship of the county’s unique topography, location, and climate. LOCATION AND TOPOGRAPHY Hood River County is nestled between the Cascade Range to the west, the Columbia River and Gorge to the north, and Surveyors Ridge, Fir Mountain and Hood River Mountain to the east. The mighty Mount Hood and its flanks define the southern border of the County. There is a dramatic range of elevation in the County - from about 75’ at the Columbia River to the north all the way to the summit of Mount Hood at 11, 240’ in the south. In addition to this great topographical variation, the County also reflects the biodiversity fostered by both its climate and topography: the fir-hemlock forests on the west and the fir-ponderosa pine-oak forests on the east. Running from the summit of Mount Hood at 11,240’ roughly north-south between these land forms is the Hood River Valley. The Heights of the lower Hood River Valley are at about 500’ elevation, Odell at about 700’, and the diminutive middle valley in the saddle between Middle Mountain and Fir Mountain, is at about 1600’. The upper valley at its lowest, northern end is at about 1400’ elevation and farther south in Parkdale about 1740’ and on up to the Cooper Spur Inn at 3400’.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Monitoring Report
    United States Department of Agriculture Monitoring and Forest Service Evaluation Report Pacific Mt. Hood National Forest Northwest Region Land and Resources Management Plan 2007 FY 2006 Salmon River, Mt. Hood National Forest Monitoring Report Fiscal Year 2006 Mt. Hood National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan August 2007 This document is available online at www.fs.fed.us/r6/mthood Table of Contents Summary....................................................................................................................................................S-1 Progress Towards Sustainability on the Mt. Hood National Forest .............................................S-1 An Overview of Current Resource Conditions.............................................................................S-3 Key Management Issues.............................................................................................................S-16 Chapter 1 - Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 Chapter 2 - Accomplishments/Results/Recommendations........................................................................ 2-1 Fire Management.......................................................................................................................... 2-1 Air Quality.................................................................................................................................... 2-5 Range Management .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Lake Watch, 2014 Annual Report
    Portland State University PDXScholar Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations Center for Lakes and Reservoirs 3-2015 Oregon Lake Watch, 2014 Annual Report Meredith Jordan Portland State University Rich Miller Portland State University, [email protected] Angela L. Strecker Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Jordan, Meredith; Miller, Rich; and Strecker, Angela L., "Oregon Lake Watch, 2014 Annual Report" (2015). Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations. 38. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub/38 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Oregon Lake Watch, 2014 Annual Report Final report submitted to the Oregon State Marine Board Meredith Jordan, Rich Miller, and Angela Strecker Portland State University, Center for Lakes and Reservoirs March 2015 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Volunteer recruiting ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2020 to 03/31/2020 Mt
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 01/01/2020 to 03/31/2020 Mt. Hood National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact R6 - Pacific Northwest Region, Regionwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Region) Regional Aquatic Restoration - Wildlife, Fish, Rare plants Completed Actual: 12/18/2019 01/2020 James Capurso Project - Watershed management 503-808-2847 EA [email protected] *UPDATED* Description: The USFS is proposing a suite of aquatic restoration activities for Region 6 to address ongoing needs, all of which have completed consultation, including activities such as fish passage restoration, wood placement, and other restoration activities. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=53001 Location: UNIT - R6 - Pacific Northwest Region All Units. STATE - Oregon, Washington. COUNTY - Adams, Asotin, Benton, Chelan, Clallam, Clark, Columbia, Cowlitz, Douglas, Ferry, Franklin, Garfield, Grant, Grays Harbor, Island, Jefferson, King, Kitsap, Kittitas, Klickitat, Lewis, Lincoln, Mason, Okanogan, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Spokane, Stevens, Thurston, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, Whatcom, Whitman, Yakima, Baker, Benton, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Coos, Crook, Curry, Deschutes, Douglas, Gilliam, Grant, Harney, Hood River, Jackson, Jefferson, Josephine, Klamath, Lake, Lane, Lincoln, Linn, Malheur,
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Jurisdictional Master Plan Appendices
    Hood River Area Multi-Jurisdictional Master Plan Supplemental Planning Material TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix A: Survey Summary .................................................................................... A-1 Appendix B: Open House Meeting Summary ........................................................... A-23 Appendix C: Focus Group Meeting Notes ................................................................. A-41 Appendix D: Stakeholder Interview Summaries ...................................................... A-53 Appendix E: Guiding Documents .............................................................................. A-61 Appendix F: Implementation Tactics ....................................................................... A-65 Appendix G: Recreational Trends ............................................................................. A-73 DRAFT Multi-Jurisdictional Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan | 2020 APPENDIX A: SURVEY SUMMARY A-1 DRAFT To: Mark Hickok, Executive Director, Hood River Valley Parks & Recreation District From: Steve Duh, Conservation Technix, Inc. Date: November 15, 2018 Re: Hood River Valley Community Survey on Parks and Recreation – Summary Results Conservation Technix is pleased to present the results of a survey of the general population of the Hood River Valley Park & Recreation District that assesses residents’ recreational needs, preferences and priorities. KEY FINDINGS District residents strongly value their parks and recreation facilities. Nearly all respondents think parks and recreation
    [Show full text]
  • Hood River County Facts Hood River County Facts
    Hood River County Facts nce a corner of the nation’s largest county, 1990. Of those, 5,831 live in the City of Hood River, O Hood River County is now the second small- 1,100 live in the City of Cascade Locks and the rest est in the state, at 522 square miles. With the are dispersed throughout the county. Columbia River forming its northern boundary, the Principal industries in the county include agriculture, recreation and tourism. Hood River County produces more winter pears than any other county in the United States. There are 15,000 acres of irrigated cropland, mainly planted to pears, cherries, apples and wine grapes, earning over $56 million in gross sales in 2006. There are 350 fruit growers in the county; 12 have orchards larger than 200 acres, while the aver- age size is 59 acres. Resources View of Mt. Hood from a Hood River County Chamber of Hood River Valley orchard Commerce & Visitors Information Center www.hoodriver.org county rises from 51 feet above sea level on the river, to its southern tip on the top of Mt. Hood, at 11,245 feet. Its western boundary lies in the Cascade Range Recreational activities include windsurfing, skiing, and its eastern boundary is roughly marked by Fir snowboarding, biking, kayaking, kiteboarding and Mountain, Bald Butte and Surveyor’s Ridge. hiking. Regional tourist destinations include Mult- nomah Falls, Timberline Lodge, Mt. Hood Meadows, the Gorge Discovery Center, the historic Mount Hood Over half of the land base in the county is under fed- Railroad and the Sternwheeler Columbia Gorge.
    [Show full text]
  • Resour Ó Natural Human Atlas Economic Public
    I - -I - I I - = - ¶t_. - I - LA - -- - - - - Zod ?&ctet &mt, O'reqot RESOUR ó NATURAL HUMAN ATLAS ECONOMIC PUBLIC JANUARY 1974 EXTENSIONEJ..O44t46tcutzt9 t4JtCOj344(t(LV PROJECT OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY Hood River County, Oregon NATURAL RESOURCE HUMAN ATLAS ECONOMIC PUBLIC January, 1974 Oregon State University Extension Service Prepared by Marilyn Ruttle, Research Assistant, Under the supervision of: Robert 0. Coppedge, Extension Economist, and Russell C. Youmans, Extension Resource Economist, Department of Agricultural Economics For sale by the Extension Business Office, Extension Hall 188, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331. $2.50 per copy. Contents Page General Description 1 Physical Aspects 2 Climate 2 Soils 4 Soil Characteristics and Land Capability 7 Land Use and Ownership................. 9 Agricultural Land 11 Forest Land 12 Water 15 Water-based Recreation 20 Minerals 20 Wildlife 20 Human Resources 21 Population 21 Employment 25 Income 32 Education 35 Health and Vital Statistics 37 Public Welfare 41 Housing 43 The County's Economy 45 Agriculture . 45 Logging and Wood Products 51 Manufacturing 52 Mining - Mineral and Metal Industries 53 Outdoor Recreation 54 Business 58 Public Services 59 Transportation. 59 Communication 60 Library Facilities. 62 Utilities 62 Public Finance 64 Selected List of Agencies . 68 Selected Bibliography 70 HOOD RIVER COUNTY lvii Lt. 10 15 20 HOOD RIVER COUNTY LEGEND PRIMARY HIGHWAYS 0 SECONDARY HIGHWAYS Q COUNTY ROADS INTERSTATE HIGHWAYSO GENERAL DESCRIPTION Hood River County is located along the northern edge of Oregon. It is bounded on the west by the lower Willamette River Basin, andon the north by the Columbia River. It is approximately 45 miles east of the city of Portland.
    [Show full text]