DOCSLIB.ORG

2006 Monitoring Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2006 Monitoring Report United States Department of Agriculture Monitoring and Forest Service Evaluation Report Pacific Mt. Hood National Forest Northwest Region Land and Resources Management Plan 2007 FY 2006 Salmon River, Mt. Hood National Forest Monitoring Report Fiscal Year 2006 Mt. Hood National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan August 2007 This document is available online at www.fs.fed.us/r6/mthood Table of Contents Summary....................................................................................................................................................S-1 Progress Towards Sustainability on the Mt. Hood National Forest .............................................S-1 An Overview of Current Resource Conditions.............................................................................S-3 Key Management Issues.............................................................................................................S-16 Chapter 1 - Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 Chapter 2 - Accomplishments/Results/Recommendations........................................................................ 2-1 Fire Management.......................................................................................................................... 2-1 Air Quality.................................................................................................................................... 2-5 Range Management ...................................................................................................................... 2-8 Noxious Weeds........................................................................................................................... 2-11 Heritage Resources..................................................................................................................... 2-17 Geology ...................................................................................................................................... 2-21 Minerals...................................................................................................................................... 2-22 Fisheries Program....................................................................................................................... 2-23 Water Resources......................................................................................................................... 2-30 Transportation/Roads ................................................................................................................. 2-40 Wildlife....................................................................................................................................... 2-43 Threatened, Endangered and Sensitive (TES) Plants ................................................................. 2-51 Soil Resources ............................................................................................................................ 2-55 Recreation................................................................................................................................... 2-57 Forest Resources and Timber Supply......................................................................................... 2-61 Chapter 3 - Financial Review .................................................................................................................... 3-1 Chapter 4 - Forest Plan Amendments/Interpretation Process Amendments.............................................. 4-1 Chapter 5 - Ongoing Planning Actions...................................................................................................... 5-1 Northwest Forest Plan .................................................................................................................. 5-1 Other Community Engagement.................................................................................................... 5-9 Appendix A - List of Preparers................................................................................................................. A-1 Appendix B – Draft Criteria and Indicators ..............................................................................................B-1 Principle 1 – Social Well-Being ...................................................................................................B-1 Principle 2 – Ecological Integrity.................................................................................................B-2 Principle 3 – Economic Well-Being.............................................................................................B-3 Figures Figure 2-1. Growth, Mortality and Harvest, Mt. Hood National Forest.................................................. 2-62 Figure 2-2. Acres Treated by Harvest Method ........................................................................................ 2-68 Figure 2-3. Reforestation Accomplishments ........................................................................................... 2-70 Figure 2-4. Stand Improvement Activities .............................................................................................. 2-70 Figure 2-5. Timber Sold and Harvested .................................................................................................. 2-74 Figure 3-1. Mt. Hood National Forest Budget Trends............................................................................... 3-3 Figure 3-2. Mt. Hood National Forest FTE/Position Usage...................................................................... 3-3 i Tables Table S-1. Summary Comparison Chart (by Fiscal Year).......................................................................S-19 Table 2-1. Fire Causes and Acres FY 2002-2006...................................................................................... 2-2 Table 2-2. Summary of Wildfires - Acres Burned by Size Class FY 2002-2006...................................... 2-3 Table 2-3. Prescribed Burning – FY 2006................................................................................................. 2-6 Table 2-4. Acres of Noxious Weed Treatment in FY 2006..................................................................... 2-12 Table 2-5. Approved Projects at Timberline Lodge ................................................................................ 2-17 Table 2-6. FY 2006 Aquatic Inventory Program..................................................................................... 2-24 Table 2-7. FY 2006 Broad Scale Monitoring Programs Listed by Fourth Field Watershed Which Track Long-Term Trends of Aquatic Species and Their Habitats on the Mt. Hood National Forest...................................................................................................... 2-26 Table 2-8. Fish Populations of Concern on the Mt. Hood National Forest ............................................. 2-27 Table 2-9. Water Year (WY) 2006 Eagle Creek Monthly Water Quality Parameter Averages.............. 2-34 Table 2-10. Water Year (WY) 2006 Clackamas River (Carter Bridge) Monthly Water Quality Parameter Averages.............................................................................................................. 2-35 Table 2-11. Road Maintenance Budget ................................................................................................... 2-41 Table 2-12. Species Observed from Mt. Hood Forest Remote Camera Transects.................................. 2-47 Table 2-13. Measured Detrimental Impacts by Silvicultural Treatment and Logging System ............... 2-55 Table 2-14. General Overall Comparisons of Detrimental Soil Damage Using Data From Monitored Units Over Two Time Periods........................................................................... 2-56 Table 2-15. Mt. Hood Wilderness Visits from May 15 through October 15, 2006................................. 2-58 Table 2-16. Mark O. Hatfield and Salmon-Huckleberry Wilderness Area Visits From May 15 Through October 15, 2006................................................................................................... 2-58 Table 2-17. Mt. Hood National Forest Campground Use in FY 2006 by Number of Campers, Number of Sites Occupied, and Percent Occupancy ........................................................... 2-59 Table 2-18. Mt. Hood National Forest Ski Area Visits in Winter FY 2005-2006................................... 2-60 Table 2-19. Mortality Class for Mt. Hood National Forest and Adjacent Lands .................................... 2-63 Table 2-20. Mortality Class for Mt. Hood National Forest Lands .......................................................... 2-63 Table 2-21. Percent of Acres Harvested by Management Area Category............................................... 2-72 Table 2-22. Acres Harvested by Forest Plan Management Area in FY 1996-2006 ................................ 2-73 Table 2-23. Mt. Hood National Forest Special Forest Products Sold and Harvested in FY 2006 .......... 2-75 Table 3-1. Budget Levels Predicted/Actual (Partial List) ......................................................................... 3-2 Table 5-1. Fifth Field Watersheds Containing Mt. Hood National Forest Lands and the Applicable Watershed Analysis................................................................................................ 5-3 Maps Map 2-1. Tree Mortality Map FY 2001-2006 ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mount Hood National Forest Recommendations for Policy Changes
    PROTECTING FRESHWATER RESOURCES ON MOUNT HOOD NATIONAL FOREST RECOMMENDATIONS FOR POLICY CHANGES Produced by PACIFIC RIVERS COUNCIL Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mount Hood National Forest Pacific Rivers Council January 2013 Fisherman on the Salmon River Acknowledgements This report was produced by John Persell, in partnership with Bark and made possible by funding from The Bullitt Foundation and The Wilburforce Foundation. Pacific Rivers Council thanks the following for providing relevant data and literature, reviewing drafts of this paper, offering important discussions of issues, and otherwise supporting this project. Alex P. Brown, Bark Dale A. McCullough, Ph.D. Susan Jane Brown Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fisheries Commission Western Environmental Law Center G. Wayne Minshall, Ph.D. Lori Ann Burd, J.D. Professor Emeritus, Idaho State University Dennis Chaney, Friends of Mount Hood Lisa Moscinski, Gifford Pinchot Task Force Matthew Clark Thatch Moyle Patrick Davis Jonathan J. Rhodes, Planeto Azul Hydrology Rock Creek District Improvement Company Amelia Schlusser Richard Fitzgerald Pacific Rivers Council 2011 Legal Intern Pacific Rivers Council 2012 Legal Intern Olivia Schmidt, Bark Chris A. Frissell, Ph.D. Mary Scurlock, J.D. Doug Heiken, Oregon Wild Kimberly Swan Courtney Johnson, Crag Law Center Clackamas River Water Providers Clair Klock Steve Whitney, The Bullitt Foundation Klock Farm, Corbett, Oregon Thomas Wolf, Oregon Council Trout Unlimited Bronwen Wright, J.D. Pacific Rivers Council 317 SW Alder Street, Suite 900 Portland, OR 97204 503.228.3555 | 503.228.3556 fax [email protected] pacificrivers.org Protecting Freshwater Resources on Mt. Hood National Forest: 2 Recommendations for Policy Change Table of Contents Executive Summary iii Part One: Introduction—An Urban Forest 1 Part Two: Watersheds of Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries Watershed Assessment
    4. Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries Watershed Assessment 4.1 Subbasin Overview General Description Location and Size The Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries Watershed consists of the 19 small Columbia River tributaries located between Bonneville Dam and the Hood River. Its major streams are Herman and Eagle creeks. The watershed is located in Hood River County, except for a small part of the Eagle Creek drainage, and includes the City of Cascade Locks and part of the City of Hood River. The watershed covers a drainage area of 63,714 acres or 99.6 square miles. Geology Volcanic lava flows, glaciers, and flooding were the key forces forming the Columbia Gorge landscape of basalt cliffs, waterfalls, talus slopes and ridges. Land elevations rise rapidly from 72 feet above sea level to approximately 5,000 feet. Mt. Defiance is the highest peak at 4,960 feet. Landslides are the dominant erosional process in recent history (USFS, 1998). Debris torrents and ice and snow avalanches are not uncommon in the winter months. Alluvial fan deposits at the mouths of the steeper, more constricted creeks suggest the frequent routing of debris torrents down these channels. The lower mile or so of creeks have gradients of about 5 percent, rising steeply at middle elevations, with lower gradient channels in glaciated headwater valleys. Climate and Weather The watershed lies in the transition zone between the wet marine climate to the west and the dry continental climate to the east. Precipitation amounts vary dramatically from east to west and with elevation, ranging from 40 to 125 to inches annually.
    [Show full text]
  • The Columbia River Gorge: Its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway by IRA A
    VOLUMB 2 NUMBBI3 NOVBMBBR, 1916 . THE .MINERAL · RESOURCES OF OREGON ' PuLhaLed Monthly By The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology Mitchell Point tunnel and viaduct, Columbia River Hi~hway The .. Asenstrasse'' of America The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations Entered aa oeoond cl,... matter at Corvallis, Ore., on Feb. 10, l9lt, accordintt to tbe Act or Auc. :U, 1912. .,.,._ ;t ' OREGON BUREAU OF MINES AND GEOLOGY COMMISSION On1cm or THm Co><M188ION AND ExmBIT OREGON BUILDING, PORTLAND, OREGON Orncm or TBm DtBIICTOR CORVALLIS, OREGON .,~ 1 AMDJ WITHY COMBE, Governor HENDY M. PABKB, Director C OMMISSION ABTBUB M. SWARTLEY, Mining Engineer H. N. LAWRill:, Port.land IRA A. WILLIAMS, Geologist W. C. FELLOWS, Sumpter 1. F . REDDY, Grants Pass 1. L. WooD. Albany R. M. BIITT8, Cornucopia P. L. CAI<PBELL, Eugene W 1. KEBR. Corvallis ........ Volume 2 Number 3 ~f. November Issue {...j .· -~ of the MINERAL RESOURCES OF OREGON Published by The Oregon Bureau of Mines and Geology ~•, ;: · CONTAINING The Columbia River Gorge: its Geologic History l Interpreted from the Columbia River Highway t. By IRA A. WILLIAMS 130 Pages 77 Illustrations 1916 ILLUSTRATIONS Mitchell Point t unnel and v iaduct Beacon Rock from Columbia River (photo by Gifford & Prentiss) front cover Highway .. 72 Geologic map of Columbia river gorge. 3 Beacon Rock, near view . ....... 73 East P ortland and Mt. Hood . 1 3 Mt. Hamilton and Table mountain .. 75 Inclined volcanic ejecta, Mt. Tabor. 19 Eagle creek tuff-conglomerate west of Lava cliff along Sandy river.
    [Show full text]
  • Hood River Subbasin Plan
    Hood River Subbasin Plan Including Lower Oregon Columbia Gorge Tributaries May 28, 2004 Submitted to the Northwest Power and Conservation Planning Council Writer/editor Holly Coccoli Hood River Soil and Water Conservation District List of Contributors Gary Asbride US Forest Service Chuti Fieldler, US Forest Service Catherine J. Flick, US Forest Service Bonnie Lamb, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Erik Olsen, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Phil Roger, Columbia Intertribal Fisheries Commission Alexis Vaivoda, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs of Oregon Mick Jennings, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs of Oregon Rod French, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildllife Table of Contents Page No. 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………..1 2. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………3 3. HOOD RIVER SUBBASIN ASSESSMENT……………………………………..7 Subbasin Overview…………………………………………………………..7 Focal Species Characterization and Status………………………………….23 Out of Subbasin Effects……………………………………………….….…67 Environment and Population Relationships……………………… ………71 Limiting Factors and Conditions……………………………………………91 Synthesis and Interpretation………………………………………………...94 4. LOWER OREGON COLUMBIA GORGE TRIBUTARIES ASSESSMENT…………………………………………………………………….101 Subbasin Overview…………………………………………………………101 Focal Species Characterization and Status…………………………………112 Out of Subbasin Effects……………………………………………………134 Environment and Population Relationships………………………………..135 Limiting Factors and Conditions…………………………………… ……141 Synthesis and Interpretation………………………………………… …….143
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Lake Watch, 2014 Annual Report
    Portland State University PDXScholar Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations Center for Lakes and Reservoirs 3-2015 Oregon Lake Watch, 2014 Annual Report Meredith Jordan Portland State University Rich Miller Portland State University, [email protected] Angela L. Strecker Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Jordan, Meredith; Miller, Rich; and Strecker, Angela L., "Oregon Lake Watch, 2014 Annual Report" (2015). Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations. 38. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub/38 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Oregon Lake Watch, 2014 Annual Report Final report submitted to the Oregon State Marine Board Meredith Jordan, Rich Miller, and Angela Strecker Portland State University, Center for Lakes and Reservoirs March 2015 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 2 Volunteer recruiting ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resour Ó Natural Human Atlas Economic Public
    I - -I - I I - = - ¶t_. - I - LA - -- - - - - Zod ?&ctet &mt, O'reqot RESOUR ó NATURAL HUMAN ATLAS ECONOMIC PUBLIC JANUARY 1974 EXTENSIONEJ..O44t46tcutzt9 t4JtCOj344(t(LV PROJECT OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY Hood River County, Oregon NATURAL RESOURCE HUMAN ATLAS ECONOMIC PUBLIC January, 1974 Oregon State University Extension Service Prepared by Marilyn Ruttle, Research Assistant, Under the supervision of: Robert 0. Coppedge, Extension Economist, and Russell C. Youmans, Extension Resource Economist, Department of Agricultural Economics For sale by the Extension Business Office, Extension Hall 188, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331. $2.50 per copy. Contents Page General Description 1 Physical Aspects 2 Climate 2 Soils 4 Soil Characteristics and Land Capability 7 Land Use and Ownership................. 9 Agricultural Land 11 Forest Land 12 Water 15 Water-based Recreation 20 Minerals 20 Wildlife 20 Human Resources 21 Population 21 Employment 25 Income 32 Education 35 Health and Vital Statistics 37 Public Welfare 41 Housing 43 The County's Economy 45 Agriculture . 45 Logging and Wood Products 51 Manufacturing 52 Mining - Mineral and Metal Industries 53 Outdoor Recreation 54 Business 58 Public Services 59 Transportation. 59 Communication 60 Library Facilities. 62 Utilities 62 Public Finance 64 Selected List of Agencies . 68 Selected Bibliography 70 HOOD RIVER COUNTY lvii Lt. 10 15 20 HOOD RIVER COUNTY LEGEND PRIMARY HIGHWAYS 0 SECONDARY HIGHWAYS Q COUNTY ROADS INTERSTATE HIGHWAYSO GENERAL DESCRIPTION Hood River County is located along the northern edge of Oregon. It is bounded on the west by the lower Willamette River Basin, andon the north by the Columbia River. It is approximately 45 miles east of the city of Portland.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Lake Watch, 2015 Annual Report
    Portland State University PDXScholar Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations Center for Lakes and Reservoirs 2015 Oregon Lake Watch, 2015 Annual Report Samuel Cimino Portland State University Rich Miller Portland State University Angela L. Strecker Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Cimino, Samuel; Miller, Rich; and Strecker, Angela L., "Oregon Lake Watch, 2015 Annual Report" (2015). Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations. 51. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub/51 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Oregon Lake Watch 2015 Annual Report Samuel Cimino, Rich Miller, and Angela Strecker Center for Lakes & Reservoirs Portland State University Summary The Oregon Lake Watch (OLW) volunteer monitoring program completed its third year of operation during 2015 with a focus on early detection of aquatic invasive species (AIS) and water quality status and trend assessments for the better management of Oregon’s lakes and reservoirs. AIS surveys emphasized the detection of Watch List aquatic plant and species that can have a negative impacts on the beneficial uses of our waterbodies. Water transparency and temperature measurements were used to track the condition of volunteers’ lakes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area
    Gorge Vistas A Visitor’s Guide to National Forest recreation opportunities in the Columbia River Gorge Welcome to the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area National Scenic Area 2 Northwest Forest Pass 8 10,000 Years of History 3 Wildflowers 10 Geologic Tour 4 Campgrounds 11 United States Waterfalls 5 Kids’ Stuff 11 Forest Service Department of Pacific Northwest Agriculture Map & Driving Tour 6 Information Back Cover Region What is a National Scenic Area? Multnomah Falls You may wonder what a National Scenic Area November 17, 1986, President Ronald Reagan residents about the history, culture and natural is. It’s not a National Forest, National Park or signed it into law. resources of the Gorge. In addition, recreation Wilderness. Instead, it is an area where rural development and resource enhancement pro- The National Scenic Area Act has two and scenic resources are protected while com- grams are some of the other projects directed purposes: munity growth and development is encouraged. by the management plan. 1. To protect and provide for the enhancement For many years, the Columbia River Gorge The National Scenic Area is 15 years old of the scenic, cultural, recreational and natural has been the focus of public attention because and still in its youth. Through the manage- resources of the Gorge; and of its unique natural features, its outstanding ment plan, the Columbia River Gorge will be public recreation opportunities and its im- 2. To protect and support the economy of protected for future generations to experience, portant contribution to the Pacific Northwest the Gorge by encouraging growth to occur in enjoy and value.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Hood River Subbasin Summary (Including Oregon Tributaries Between Bonneville Dam and the Hood River)
    Draft Hood River Subbasin Summary (including Oregon tributaries between Bonneville Dam and the Hood River) November 15, 2000 Prepared for the Northwest Power Planning Council Lead Writer Holly Coccoli, Hood River Watershed Group Subbasin Team Leader Mick Jennings Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon Contributors Jim Newton, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Gary Asbridge, U.S. Forest Service Richard Larsen, U.S. Forest Service Jim Torland, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Michael Lambert, Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon Hood River Subbasin Summary (including Oregon tributaries between Bonneville Dam and the Hood River) Table of Contents Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 1 AREA 1: HOOD RIVER WATERSHED ........................................................................................ 2 Fish and Wildlife Resources ............................................................................................................... 2 Subbasin Description .................................................................................................................. 2 Fish and Wildlife Status .............................................................................................................. 4 Habitat Areas and Quality ......................................................................................................... 15 Habitat Areas and Quality
    [Show full text]
  • Goal 06 Air Water Land Quality
    GOAL 6 - AIR, WATER AND LAND RESOURCE QUALITY A. Water Quality 1. Introduction: Maintenance of high water quality is important for the health of the human beings, fish, and other living things that inhabit the County. 2. Definition: a. Fecal Coliform: These are organisms that originate in the intestinal tracts of warm blooded animals, and indicate sewage or livestock contamination. The higher the coliform count the more likely the coliform contains harmful pathogenic bacteria. b. Pathogen: A virus or bacteria-causing disease. c. Chemical Concentrations: Chemical concentrations are the amount of certain chemicals found naturally and/or man-introduced in all water. Elements tested include: arsenic, boron, iron and others. Major sources include industrial wastes, pesticide residues, and soil runoff. d. Nutrients: These are elements found in all water. They may be introduced either naturally or by man. The two major nutrients are nitrate and orthophosphate which together with sunlight and low stream flows produce algal blooms in water. The major sources of nutrients include urban soils and agricultural runoff, sewage, and some pesticide residues. 3. Water Quality: The Federal Section 208 (non-point pollution control) program and the State's 303e program helps to maintain good water quality and improve it where necessary. Factors that degrade water quality include high water temperature, low dissolved oxygen levels, sediment, toxic sprays, and too many nutrients in the water. These factors are usually inter-related. For example irrigation water diversions sometimes are so great that the water volume in a stream is inadequate to maintain a cold water temperature in summer. The higher the water temperature, the lower the dissolved oxygen for fish and other aquatic organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • EAGLE CREEK FIRE 2017 by Teresa Kasner Corbett, Oregon
    EAGLE CREEK FIRE 2017 by Teresa Kasner Corbett, Oregon ! " The Eagle Creek Fire, was reported on September 2nd at approximately 4 pm in the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area. The fire was reportedly started by a 15 year old boy throwing fireworks into the canyon. A woman saw this and chastised the boy and his friends and hiked back to the trailhead to report the fire and point out the boy and his friends just before they pulled out of the parking lot, where they were apprehended by the police. " The fire trapped 153 hikers and forced them to stay overnight six miles up the trail. Mountain Wave Search and rescue dropped supplies from a helicopter to the hikers to sustain them throughout the night. The next morning, Pacific Northwest Search and Rescue, along with Mountain Wave Search and Rescue, escorted the hikers to Wahtum Lake and bussed them back to the Eagle Creek Trailhead. " The fire grew to 3,000 acres the first night. During the night of September 4th and 5th, east winds combined with excessive heat caused the fire to speedily grow in size pushing westward. As of the morning of September 5th, the fire had grown to over 20,000 acres and had jumped across the Columbia River into Washington near Archer Mountain. " The community of Cascade Locks Oregon was the first to experience mandatory evacuations, with 283 structures, including 15 businesses, being threatened by the fire. Salmon hatcheries at Cascade Locks were forced to release 600,000 fish six months earlier than expected. The fire also threatened historic structures in the Eagle Creek Day Use Area, including those built by the Civilian Conservation Corps in the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Monitoring Report
    United States Department of Agriculture Monitoring and Forest Service Evaluation Report Pacific Mt. Hood National Forest Northwest Region Land and Resources Management Plan 2005 FY 2004 Monitoring Report Fiscal Year 2004 Mt. Hood National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan September 2005 This document is available online at www.fs.fed.us/r6/mthood Table of Contents Summary........................................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 - Introduction ..............................................................................................................................17 Chapter 2 - Accomplishments/Results/Recommendations..........................................................................19 Fire Management............................................................................................................................19 Air Quality......................................................................................................................................22 Range Management ........................................................................................................................24 Noxious Weeds...............................................................................................................................26 Heritage Resources.........................................................................................................................30 Geology ..........................................................................................................................................34
    [Show full text]