DOCSLIB.ORG

The Local Authorities (Functions and Responsibilities) (England) Regulations 2000 Responsibility for Function

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Local Authorities (Functions and Responsibilities) (England) Regulations 2000 Responsibility for Function THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES (FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES) (ENGLAND) REGULATIONS 2000 RESPONSIBILITY FOR FUNCTION FUNCTIONS EXECUTIVE (ie COMMITTEE OR CABINET OFFICER DELEGATION Any function under a local Act other than a function CABINET/COUNCIL) MEMBER RESPONSIBLE (WHERE APPLICABLE) specified or referred to in Regulation 2 or Schedule 1 London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2008 Executive Relevant Cabinet Members Strategic Director Built Environment The Whole Act Strategic Director City Management London Local Authorities Act 2007 Part 2, Sections 4 to 31 Executive Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Directors Growth, Planning and Housing Section 32 Non-Executive Planning Applications Executive Director, Committee Growth Planning and Housing Part 3, Section 37 Executive Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Director, Growth Planning and Housing Remainder of Part 3 Non-Executive Licensing Committee Executive Director, City Management and Communities Part 4 Executive Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Directors, Growth Planning and Housing Part 5, Sections 70, 72 and 75 Non-Executive Licensing Committee Executive Director City Management and Communities FUNCTIONS EXECUTIVE (ie COMMITTEE OR CABINET OFFICER DELEGATION Any function under a local Act other than a function CABINET/COUNCIL) MEMBER RESPONSIBLE (WHERE APPLICABLE) specified or referred to in Regulation 2 or Schedule 1 Section 71 Non-Executive Licensing Committee Executive Director City Management and Communities Sections 73-4, 76-78 Executive Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Directors Growth, Planning and Housing and City Management and Communities Part 6 Executive Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Directors Growth, Planning and Housing and and City Management and Communities London Local Authorities Act 2004 Parts 2, 3, 4 and 6 Executive Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Directors for Growth, Housing and Planning and City Management and Communities London Local Authorities and Transport for London 2003 The Whole Act Executive Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Directors Growth, Housing and Planning and City Management and Communities FUNCTIONS EXECUTIVE (ie COMMITTEE OR CABINET OFFICER DELEGATION Any function under a local Act other than a function CABINET/COUNCIL) MEMBER RESPONSIBLE (WHERE APPLICABLE) specified or referred to in Regulation 2 or Schedule 1 London Local Authorities Act 2000 Service of penalty charge notice on basis of information Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Director City provided by camera etc (Section 4) Management and Communities Service of penalty charge notice where parking attendant Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Member Strategic Director City prevented from issuing a notice (Section 5) Management and Communities Cleansing relevant land of refuse and litter (Section 19) Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Director City Management and Communities Licensing – see references to different licensing functions Council Licensing Committee Executive Director City referred to below Management and Communities Licensing of Buskers (Part V) Council Licensing Committee Executive Director City Management and Communities City of Westminster Act 1999 The Whole Act Non-Executive Licensing Committee Executive Director City Management and Communities FUNCTIONS EXECUTIVE (ie COMMITTEE OR CABINET OFFICER DELEGATION Any function under a local Act other than a function CABINET/COUNCIL) MEMBER RESPONSIBLE (WHERE APPLICABLE) specified or referred to in Regulation 2 or Schedule 1 London Local Authorities Act 1996 Penalty Charge Notices in respect of Bus Lane infringements Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Director (Section 4) City Management and Communities Fire Safety and Entertainment Licensing Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Director City Management and Approval of policies in respect of Entertainment licenses Communities Register of all licensed premises for public entertainment Council Licensing Committee Executive Director City Management and Communities City of Westminster Act 1996 Council Licensing Committee Executive Director City Management and Service of Closure Notices and Closure Orders Communities FUNCTIONS EXECUTIVE (ie COMMITTEE OR CABINET OFFICER DELEGATION Any function under a local Act other than a function CABINET/COUNCIL) MEMBER RESPONSIBLE (WHERE APPLICABLE) specified or referred to in Regulation 2 or Schedule 1 London Local Authorities Act 1995 Making of special temporary prohibitions within a special Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Member: Executive Director City parking area (Section 9) Management and Communities Notice requiring removal of unauthorised advertisement Council Planning Applications Executive Director hoardings etc (Section 11) Committee Growth, Housing and Planning Notice requiring removal of signs on buildings (Section 12) Council Planning Applications Executive Director Growth, Housing and Planning Appointment of deputies to the Fire Authority (Section 44) Council General Purposes Committee Head of Legal and Democratic Services London Local Authorities Act 1994 Consent of distribution of free literature (Section 4) Council Licensing Committee Executive Director City Management and Communities Street trading - Regulation of street trading and associated issues Council Licensing Committee Executive Director City Management and - Renewal of licenses Cabinet Licensing Committee Communities Making of regulations relating to dangerous structure fees Council Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Director (Section 8) Growth Housing and Planning To grant unopposed renewals, transfers and variations for Council Licensing Committee Executive Director special treatment licenses. Growth, Housing and Planning FUNCTIONS EXECUTIVE (ie COMMITTEE OR CABINET OFFICER DELEGATION Any function under a local Act other than a function CABINET/COUNCIL) MEMBER RESPONSIBLE (WHERE APPLICABLE) specified or referred to in Regulation 2 or Schedule 1 London Local Authorities Act 1991 Removal of distribution containers on the highway (Section Council General Purposes Committee Executive Director of City 22) Management and Communities Licensing of Special Treatment Premises (Part II) Approval of policies in respect of special treatment licenses Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Member None Hearing of and determination of applications made to the Council Licensing Committee None Council in respect of special treatment licenses Licensing of premises or persons in respect of special Council Licensing Committee Executive Director City treatment establishments Management and Communities To grant unopposed renewals, transfers and variations for Council Licensing Committee Executive Director City special treatment licences Management and Communities London Local Authorities (No 2) Act 1990 Crime prevention measures (Section 5) Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Member None - Crime prevention policies Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Member None Restoration of gas and water and electricity Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Director City Management and Communities FUNCTIONS EXECUTIVE (ie COMMITTEE OR CABINET OFFICER DELEGATION Any function under a local Act other than a function CABINET/COUNCIL) MEMBER RESPONSIBLE (WHERE APPLICABLE) specified or referred to in Regulation 2 or Schedule 1 London Local Authorities Act 1990 Removal of shopping or luggage trolleys found in the open Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Member Executive Director City air (Section 43) Management and Communities Street Trading - Regulation of street trading and market trading together Cabinet Relevant Cabinet Members None with the provision, maintenance and management of storage accommodation. - Policies etc (see above) - Renewal of licenses etc Council Licensing Committee Executive Director City Management and Communities Greater London Council (General Powers Act 1986) Consent for demolition of works under street (Section 5) Council General Purposes Committee Executive Director Growth, Planning and Housing Consent for construction which causes obstruction to access Council General Purposes Committee Executive Director to vaults and cellars (Section 6) Growth, Planning and Housing Consent for in-filling of vaults and cellars (Section 7) Council General Purposes Committee Executive Director Growth, Planning and Housing Powers relating to certain retaining walls (Section 8) Council General Purposes Committee Executive Director Growth, Planning and Housing FUNCTIONS EXECUTIVE (ie COMMITTEE OR CABINET OFFICER DELEGATION Any function under a local Act other than a function CABINET/COUNCIL) MEMBER RESPONSIBLE (WHERE APPLICABLE) specified or referred to in Regulation 2 or Schedule 1 Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1984 Registration of sleeping accommodation (Part IV) Council Planning Applications Executive Director Committee Growth, Planning and Housing Provisions relating to the sale of goods by competitive Council General Purposes Committee Executive Director City bidding (Part VI) these provisions include the registration of Management and premises or stalls. Communities Power to make charge in respect of approval of plans etc Council General Purposes Committee Executive Director relating to drains (Section 36) Growth, Planning and Housing Removal of occupants of buildings in vicinity of dangerous Council General Purposes Committee Executive Director structures etc (Section 38) Growth, Planning and Housing FUNCTIONS EXECUTIVE (ie COMMITTEE OR CABINET OFFICER DELEGATION Any function under a local Act other than a function CABINET/COUNCIL) MEMBER RESPONSIBLE (WHERE APPLICABLE) specified or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ALAVES - the Blessley History
    Section 7 ALAVES - The Blessley History Editor’s Note - 1 When Ken Blessley agreed to complete the ALAVES story it was decided by the new Local Authority Valuers Association that it would be printed, together with the first instalment, and circulated to members. Both parts have been printed unamended, the only liberty I have taken with the text has been to combine the appendices. As reprinting necessitated retyping any subsequent errors and omissions are my responsibility. Barry Searle, 1987 Editor’s Note - 2 As part of the preparation of “A Century Surveyed”, Ken Blessley’s tour de force has been revisited. The document has been converted into computer text and is reproduced herewith, albeit in a much smaller and condensed typeface in order to reduce the number of pages. Colin Bradford, 2009 may well be inaccuracies. These can, of course, be corrected if they are of any significance. The final version will, it is hoped, be carefully conserved in the records of the Association so that possibly some ALAVES - 1949-1986 future member may be prepared to carry out a similar exercise in perhaps ten years’ time. The circulation of the story is limited, largely because of expense, but also because of the lesser interest of the majority of the current membership in what happened all those years Kenneth Blessley ago. I have therefore, confined the distribution list to the present officers and committee members, past presidents, and others who have held office for a significant period. The story of the Association of Local Authority Valuers 1. HOW IT ALL BEGAN & Estate Surveyors, 1949-1986.
    [Show full text]
  • London Clerical Workers 1880-1914: the Search for Stability
    London Clerical Workers 1880-1914: The Search For Stability By Michael Heller (University College London, University of London) Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in July 2003 UMI Number: U602595 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U602595 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Contents Abstract............................................................................................................ 2 Acknowledgements........................................................................................... 4 Introduction................................................................................................ 5 Chapters: 1. A Definition of the Late Victorian and Edwardian London........ Clerk35 2. Work, Income, Promotion and Stability.................................................68 3. The Clerk, the Office and Work............................................................108 4. Attitudes of the Clerk towards Work.....................................................142
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 9Th June 1961 4305
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 9TH JUNE 1961 4305 SECOND SCHEDULE The copies, or extracts of the Development Plan so deposited, will be open for inspection free of Lengths of Road upon which Waiting is Limited charge by aid persons- interested during usual office to Thirty Minutes in any Hour hours. Bow Street (A.378) (North side) The amendment became operative as from the 9th (a) The Waiting Bay situated between 147 yards d'ay of June 1961, but if any person aggrieved by it and 164 yards east of the River Bridge (Length desires to question the validity thereof or of any pro- 17 yards). vision contained therein on the ground that it is not (&) The Waiting Bay situated between 133 yards within the pow.ers of the Town and Country Planning and 163 yards west of Bow Bridge (Length 30 Act4 1947, or on the ground that any requirement of the Act or any regulation made thereunder has not yards). been complied with in relation to the making of the Copies of the proposed Order (together with plans amendment, he may, within six weeks from the 9th showing the roads referred to have deposited at the day of June '1961, make application to the High Court. office of -the Clerk of the Rural District Council, Dated this 8th day of June 1961. Council Offices, Langport, and at County Hall, Taunton, and may be inspected during ordinary W. O. Hart, Clerk of the London County office hours. Council. Objections to the proposals must be sent in writing The County Hall, Westminster Bridge, to the undersigned by 3rd July 1961.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government in London Had Always Been More Overtly Partisan Than in Other Parts of the Country but Now Things Became Much Worse
    Part 2 The evolution of London Local Government For more than two centuries the practicalities of making effective governance arrangements for London have challenged Government and Parliament because of both the scale of the metropolis and the distinctive character, history and interests of the communities that make up the capital city. From its origins in the middle ages, the City of London enjoyed effective local government arrangements based on the Lord Mayor and Corporation of London and the famous livery companies and guilds of London’s merchants. The essential problem was that these capable governance arrangements were limited to the boundaries of the City of London – the historic square mile. Outside the City, local government was based on the Justices of the Peace and local vestries, analogous to parish or church boundaries. While some of these vestries in what had become central London carried out extensive local authority functions, the framework was not capable of governing a large city facing huge transport, housing and social challenges. The City accounted for less than a sixth of the total population of London in 1801 and less than a twentieth in 1851. The Corporation of London was adamant that it neither wanted to widen its boundaries to include the growing communities created by London’s expansion nor allow itself to be subsumed into a London-wide local authority created by an Act of Parliament. This, in many respects, is the heart of London’s governance challenge. The metropolis is too big to be managed by one authority, and local communities are adamant that they want their own local government arrangements for their part of London.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unification of London
    THE RT. HON. G. J. GOSCHEN, M.P., SAYS CHAOS AREA A OF _o_ AND _)w»___x_;_»wH RATES, OF «-uCA__, AUTHORITIES, OF. fa. f<i<fn-r/r f(£sKnyca __"OUR REMEDIEsI OFT WITHIN OURSELVES DO LIE." THE UNIFICATION OF LONDON: THE NEED AND THE REMEDY. BY JOHN LEIGHTON, F.S.A. ' LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT IS A CHAOS OF AUTHORITIES,OF RATES, — and of areas." G. jf. Goscheu London: ELLIOT STOCK, 62, PATERNOSTER ROW, CITY 1895. To The Right Hon. SIR JOHN LUBBOCK, P.C., M.P., HON. LL.D. (CAMB., EDIN., AND DUB.), F.R.S., F.S.A., F.G.S., M.R.I., V.P.E.S., Trustee of the British Museum,Commissioner of Lieutenancy for London, THIS BOOK is dedicated by CONTENTS. PAGE Chapter — I.— The Need 7 II. The Remedy ... — ... n III.— Local Government ... 17 IV. Conclusion 23 INDEX PAGE PAGE Abattoirs ... 21 Champion Hill 52 Address Card 64 Chelsea ... ... ... 56 Aldermen iS City 26 Aldermen, of Court ... 19 Clapham ... ... ... 54 AsylumsBoard ig Clapton 42 Clerkenwell 26 Barnsbury ... ... ... 29 Clissold Park 4U Battersea ... ... ... 54 Coroner's Court 21 Battersea Park 56 County Council . ... 18 Bayswater 58 County Court ... ... 21 Bermondsey 32 BethnalGreen 30 Bloomsbury 38 Dalston ... ... ... 42 Borough 34 Deptford 48 Borough Council 20 Dulwich 52 Bow 44 Brixton 52 Finsbury Park 40 Bromley ... 46 Fulham 56 Cab Fares ... ... ... 14 Gospel Oak 02 Camberwell 52 Green Park Camden Town 3S Greenwich ... Canonbury 28 Guardians, ... Board of ... 20 PAGE PAGE Hackney ... ... ... 42 Omnibus Routes ... ... 15 Hampstead... ... ... Co Hatcham ... 50 Paddington 58 Haverstock Hill ..
    [Show full text]
  • Black Internationalism and African and Caribbean
    BLACK INTERNATIONALISM AND AFRICAN AND CARIBBEAN INTELLECTUALS IN LONDON, 1919-1950 By MARC MATERA A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History Written under the direction of Professor Bonnie G. Smith And approved by _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ _______________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May 2008 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Black Internationalism and African and Caribbean Intellectuals in London, 1919-1950 By MARC MATERA Dissertation Director: Bonnie G. Smith During the three decades between the end of World War I and 1950, African and West Indian scholars, professionals, university students, artists, and political activists in London forged new conceptions of community, reshaped public debates about the nature and goals of British colonialism, and prepared the way for a revolutionary and self-consciously modern African culture. Black intellectuals formed organizations that became homes away from home and centers of cultural mixture and intellectual debate, and launched publications that served as new means of voicing social commentary and political dissent. These black associations developed within an atmosphere characterized by a variety of internationalisms, including pan-ethnic movements, feminism, communism, and the socialist internationalism ascendant within the British Left after World War I. The intellectual and political context of London and the types of sociability that these groups fostered gave rise to a range of black internationalist activity and new regional imaginaries in the form of a West Indian Federation and a United West Africa that shaped the goals of anticolonialism before 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline Copy
    POLITICS 1066 Norman invasion of England 1216 establishment of the Parliament of England 1888 creation of the London County Council 410 Londinium is abandoned following Roman decline the power of England is centralised: 1963 creation of the Greater London William the Conqueror recognises the autonomy 1500s economy in the City of London, Roman foundation of Londinium 1067 the Common Council of 43 of the City of London from the monarchy politics and religion in Westminster failed attempt to amalgamate the City with the rest of London 1376 the City is created 200 000 1894 2000 Ken Livingstone appointed Mayor of London establishment of the Corporation of London the Anglo-Saxons move inside the ~1150 ~890 Wall for defence purposes Amsterdam falls under the French ~1100 Westminster becomes the official seat of the King 1795 loosing its role as financial capital of Europe ~520 the Anglo-Saxons take over, and 2009 Labour proposes (in vain) to introduce settle outside the Roman town political control on the Corporation 1215 the King recognizes the Lord Mayor, directly elected by the City underground and rail lines in 1902 ECONOMICS beginning of insurance market the “Big Bang”: deregulation of financial 1688 in E. LLoyd’s coffehouse 1986 1300s incorporation of the Livery Companies markets and introduction of electronic trading in the City government 1571 Royal Exchange 1694 Bank of England 2007 start of the financial crisis 1665 the Great Plague 140 000 THE CITY OF LONDON 1350 the Black Death 1666 the Great Fire 1941 the Blitz: German bombings over London 1993 Bishopsgate bombing by IRA A BRIEF SPATIAL AND POLITICAL HISTORY 2002 renewed spatial planning policies 1200s First covered markets demolition of the Wall 1976 completion of the Barbican Estate completion of 30 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks Open Spaces Timeline
    Wandsworth Council Parks time line There are many large green open places in south west London. The commons of Barnes, Battersea, Clapham, Putney, Streatham, Tooting, Wandsworth and Wimbledon date from ‘time immemorial’. Though largely comprising the wastes or heathland of a parish, the commons were integral to mediaeval land settlements and were owned by lords of the manors. As London developed during the nineteenth century the land was increasingly developed for housing. Several legal battles took place to defend the commons as open land. Garratt Green had long been ‘defended’ by the infamous Mayors of Garratt elections. Listed below are the green places in the Borough of Wandsworth that are managed by Wandsworth Parks Service. Further historic information can be found in the individual site management plans. 1858 A Royal Commission into housing recommended creating Battersea Park, Kennington Park, and Victoria Park in Hackney with formal and informal gardens as a way offering moral improvement to an area. Health was a matter of fresh air, exercise and diet, rather than one of medical resources. 1885 Battersea Vestry created Christchurch Gardens as ‘an outdoor drawing room’. The shelter and memorial were added after 1945. 1886 Waterman’s Green was created by the Metropolitan Board of Works as part of the approach to the new Putney Bridge when it was rebuilt in stone. It was not publicly accessible. 1888 Battersea Vestry owned the parish wharf and created Vicarage Gardens as a promenade, complete with ornamental urns on plinths along the river wall. During 1990s it was included in flood defence schemes. 1903 Leader’s Gardens and Coronation Gardens were created as public parks by private donation from two wealthy local individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, Novembeb 20, 1900. 7331
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, NOVEMBEB 20, 1900. 7331 OTICE is Lereby given, that the Governor at which respective offices, as well as at the office N and Company of the New River brought of the Company, all persons wishing to inspect from Chad well and Amwell to London, commonly them may do so at any time during office hours for called the New River Company, under the powers the period of one month before they are confirmed. of the Metropolis Water Act, 1852, the "Metro- —Dated this seventeenth November, 1900. polis Water Act, 1871, and the Metropolis Water By order of the Board, Act, 1897, has (subject to necessary confirmation) . MONTAGUE WATTS, Secretary. made Regulations instead of the Regulations now Office : Southwark Bridge-road, London, S.E. in force, and that the Regulations so made have been submitted to the Local Government Board TVT OTICE is here1 y given that the East London for confirmation, and that copies have been 1, JJ Waterworks Company under the powers of deposited at the offices of the Mayor, Aldermen, the Metropolis Water Act, 1852, ihe Metropolis and Commons of the city of London, the London Wa'er Act, 1871, and the Metropolis Water, Acr, County Council, the city of Westminster, the 1897, have, subject to necessary confirmation, made metropolitan boroughs of Finsbury, Islington, Regulations instead of the Regulations now in Shoreditch, Stepney, Hackney, Stoke Newington, force, and that the Regulations so made have been St. Pancras, Hampstead, and Holborn ; the submitted to the Local Government Board for Urban District Councils of Hornc-ey, Tottenham, confirmation, and that copies have been deposited and Wood Green, and at the offices of the County at the offices of the Major, Aldermen, and Com- Councils of Middlesex and Hertfordshire; at mons of the city of London, of the London County which respective offices, as well as at the office of Council, of the metropolitan boroughs of Bethnal the.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 Years On
    2 July 2010 A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 years on Tony Travers and Christine Whitehead A brief history… It is 10 years since the Greater London Authority was created as a metropolitan or regional tier of government for London. There have been five different arrangements of ‘upper tier’ government in the capital since the Metropolitan Board of Works (MBW) was created in 1855 to build infrastructure. The MBW was succeeded by the London County Council (LCC), a powerful authority for the inner part of the contemporary city. Within this area 28 metropolitan boroughs and the City of London delivered ‘local’ services. Two factors were particularly important in influencing the progress of London’s government. First, the physical expansion of the city created demands for provision across a wider area than the City of London’s original and long-evolved ‘square mile’. The Metropolitan Police Service was created by the government in 1829 to meet the law and order requirements of a fast-growing city. The squalor and chaos of the London of the 1850s prompted Parliament to legislate for London’s first-ever metropolitan government, an indirectly-elected entity. Further physical expansion between the end of the 19 th century and 1939 generated a debate about the need for a ‘Greater London’ government 1. The second important factor in determining the kinds of institutions that emerged was the local power and parochialism of both the City of London and the parish-based or ad hoc bodies that developed to deliver services in the absence of a city-wide government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Planning Game—English Style Or the Greater London Development Plan, 7 Urb
    Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law Volume 7 January 1974 The lP anning game—English Style or the Greater London Development Plan Victor Moore Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Victor Moore, The Planning game—English Style or the Greater London Development Plan, 7 Urb. L. Ann. 57 (1974) Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw/vol7/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PLANNING GAME-ENGLISH STYLE OR THE GREATER LONDON DEVELOPMENT PLAN VICTOR MOORE* Anglophiles will be aware that since the statute Quia Emptores in the year 1290, no single piece of legislation has made as great an im- pact on English land law as that brought about by the Town and Country Planning Act of 1947.1 The lynchpin of that legislation, which gave to England its first comprehensive statutory machinery for controlling land use, was that no landowner could develop his land without first obtaining permission from the local planning authority.2 The content of the development plan which local plan- ning authorities were required to prepare for their areas determined whether permission would be granted, or granted subject to condi- tions, or whether the planning authority would begin cease and desist proceedings if development commenced without permission.' The history of these development plans is well known.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 3Rd August 1962 Bills Receiving
    6154 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 3RD AUGUST 1962 At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 30th day Pipe-lines Act, 1%2 (c.5'8). of July 1962. Road Traffic Act, 1962 (c.59). PRESENT, Glasgow 'Corporation Order Confirmation Act, 1962. Tay Road Bridge Order Confirmation Act, 1962. -The QUEEN'S Most Excellent Majesty in Council. Leith Harbour and1 Docks Order Confirmation Act, Whereas a Representation duly made to Her Majesty 11962. in Council by .the Minister of 'Housing amd Local Maidstone Corporation (Trolley Vehicles) Order Con- Government that, for (the protection of the Public firmation Act, 1962. Hea&th, burials- should be discontinued as hereinafter Pier and! Harbour Order (Great Yarmouth New directed on, 'the Churchyard of ISt, Mary's Chuidh, Britannia iPier) Confirmation Act, 1962. Northiam St. Mary, 'Rye, in the County of Sussex, Pier and Harbour Order (Great Yarmouth Port and Haven) Confirmation Act, 1962. has, <in pursuance of an (Order in Council!' made the 1 123rd day of May 1962, and duly published, been Pier and Harbour Order (ILangstone Harbour) Con- taken into consideration by a Commattee of the Privy firmation Act, 1962. Council: Letdhworth Garden City Corporation Act, 1962. Now, .therefore, Her Majesty, in exercise of .the Dartfordi Tunnel Act, 1962. .powers conferred on Her by section one of itihe [Burial Orpington Urban District 'Council Act, 1962. Act, 1«53- 16 & 17 Vdct. c. 1134, and of all other British Transport Commission Act, 1962. .powers Her 'enabling, is pleased, by and with the City oif London (Various Powers) Act, 1962. advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and ait is Regent (Refining iComipany Act, 1962.
    [Show full text]