7. Potential Problem of Biogas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

7. Potential Problem of Biogas CH2M HILL Hong Kong Ltd. 7. POTENTIAL PROBLEM OF BIOGAS 7.1 Introduction 7.1.1 This section presents an assessment on the potential problem of biogas in accordance with the requirements given in Clause 3.5.3 of the EIA Study Brief. 7.1.2 To create solid ground for the proposed residential portion, ponds at the southwestern boundary of the Site will have to be reclaimed. Top soils will be dredged from each fishpond and filled with fill materials (e.g. marine sand or recycled C&D materials). The dredged topsoil will be re-used on-site for the establishment of WNR. 7.1.3 Biogas comprises mainly of methane and carbon dioxide and is generated as a result of anaerobic degradation of organic matters buried under reclaimed land. The potential risk would be migration of methane and carbon dioxide, which are flammable and asphyxiating. 7.2 Assessment Methodology 7.2.1 As it is impossible to measure the rates of biogas emission at this stage from the organic sediment within the reclaimed area, the biogas generation has therefore been estimated from the proposed reclaimed areas based on a stoichiometric analysis. 7.2.2 The Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and sediment oxygen demand (SOD) can be used to estimate the methane generating potential of the sediment at the reclaimed areas. 7.2.3 SOD values are therefore used to calculate the total biodegradable organic carbons in the sediment. SOD20days has been analysed to estimate the “ultimate SOD” for estimation of biogas generation. 7.3 Field Sampling and Laboratory Analysis 7.3.1 Ponds dredging and filling will be concentrated at the southwestern boundary of the Site where the residential development is planned. 7.3.2 To enable a biogas assessment be carried out, sediments were sampled at fishponds within the proposed residential area where some pond mud could be to be left in place. Sediment samples were collected at Pond no.19 and no. 62 as shown in Figure 7-1 by a HOKLAS accredited laboratory in May 2002 for analysis of Total Organic Carbon (TOC), Sediment Oxygen Demand (SOD20days) and moisture content. 7.3.3 As it is envisaged that the first 0.3m of topsoil at the proposed residential area will be dredged before any filling activities, sediments were therefore sampled at depths of 0.5m and 1m below pond water level to quantify the potential biogas generation problem through appreciation of the TOC and SOD levels at the surface layer. 7.3.4 Each sample weighs about 0.5g. The results of analysis are presented in Table 7-1 below. Table 7-1 Sampling Locations and Levels of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and Sediment Oxygen Demand (SOD) Moisture TOC SOD 20days Location Sample Depth (m) (% w/w) (% dry wt) (mg/kg) Pond 19-1 1.0 21.6 0.69 2644 Pond 19-2 1.0 34.9 0.69 3372 Pond 19-3 1.0 24.4 0.34 2826 Pond 19-4 0.5 32 0.76 3468 Pond 19-5 0.5 31.2 0.58 3021 7-1 CH2M HILL Hong Kong Ltd. Pond 19-6 0.5 21.7 0.46 1144 Pond 62-1 1.0 26.2 0.95 2955 Pond 62-2 1.0 34.4 1.13 4861 Pond 62-3 1.0 25.2 0.71 1862 Pond 62-4 0.5 44.3 1.11 1912 Pond 62-5 0.5 38.9 0.83 1197 Pond 62-6 0.5 35 1.06 2317 Average - 30.8 0.78 2632 7.4 Risk Assessment Criterion 7.4.1 Though the issue of methane risk is not a requirement in the TM on EIA Process and there is no primary legislation in Hong Kong covering hazards to developments caused by methane gas, there is however certain relevant guidelines that can be referenced to assess its safe rates. 7.4.2 The process adopted for estimation of safe rates of biogas emission for filled land over sediment left in-situ is similar to estimating safe emission rates of landfill gas when deciding whether or not an old landfill site can be regarded as being sufficiently stabilised without poses any danger. The assessment of a safe rate of landfill gas emission is necessary for determining when a site no longer needs to be monitored and when it can be used for unrestricted development. The assumption made is that any type of building could be safely constructed on top of the landfill and therefore required the adoption of a universally applicable safe rate of methane emission. EPD’s Landfill Gas Hazard Guidance Note 7.4.3 There is no primary legislation in Hong Kong covering hazards to development caused by landfill gas or methane gas generated from organic deposits. The most relevant guidance is the guideline, “Landfill Gas Hazard Guidance Note” issued by the Environmental Protection Department (EPD). The guidance note recommends that methane gas should be monitored periodically in all excavations, manholes and chambers and any confined spaces during construction. No works and no entry to the excavation areas or confined spaces should be allowed and the personnel on-site should be evacuated if the methane concentration measured during the monitoring exceeds 20% lower explosive limit (LEL) (or 1.0% gas). Maximum “safe” rate of gas emission based on the UK Department of the Environment’s Waste Management Paper No. 26A: Landfill Completion 7.4.4 The UK Department of the Environment Waste Management Paper No. 26A on Landfill Completion recommends a maximum acceptable rate of methane ingress into a building constructed on a disused landfill site. It states that methane emission rates from monitoring boreholes should fall consistently below 0.015 m3 per hour. This criterion was developed to determine when monitoring of landfill gas emissions at a restored landfill can be discontinued and when the site can be used for unrestricted development. It is assumed that the most sensitive ‘at risk’ room or void has a height of 2.5 m and a very low rate of ventilation of 1 air change per week. 7.4.5 For residential development at the built area of Fung Lok Wai, it is considered more conservative to adopt a height of 1 m to represent the void space (to allow for smaller void spaces such as utilities or services ducts) and a ventilation rate of 1 air change per day (this is in line with rates of natural ventilation for closed rooms). The maximum safe rate of methane ingress was then defined as that at which it would take 1 day for the methane concentration to reach 1% (v/v). This is 20% of the lower explosive limit (LEL) for methane and provides a safety factor of 5 to allow for variations in, for instance, rates of gas emission across the area of the site or over time compared with those measured at particular places and during the evaluation period. 7.4.6 The corresponding daily maximum “safe” rate of methane gas emission per unit area is therefore calculated as follows: 7-2 CH2M HILL Hong Kong Ltd. -1 3 -2 -1 1.0 m x 0.01 d (equivalent to m CH4 m d ) 3 -2 -1 = 0.01 m CH4m d -2 -1 = 10 litres CH4m d 7.4.7 The criterion provides a reasonable general guide for determining whether the rates of methane emission pose an unacceptable risk to unrestricted development on a potential site. 7.5 Estimation of potential Gas Emissions 7.5.1 The generation rate of biogas depends on a number of parameters including concentrations and biodegradability of the organic matters in the sediment, age of the reclamation, redox potential, temperature, moisture content, presence of toxic matters which may inhibit biological activities. These parameters may vary at different depths and locations and their interactions are complex and difficult to predict. For the purpose of this preliminary assessment, the potential methane risk will be assessed based on the theoretical biogas production rate. 7.5.2 As learnt from several anaerobic degradation projects, the formation of biogas under anaerobic conditions can be described as a first order degradation process. This process is characterised by high gas generation rates at the early stage of the process, followed by an exponential decrease over the course of time. Although it is difficult to predict the extent of anaerobic conditions, the generation of biogas can be estimated theoretically based on the available data on TOC and the SOD. 7.5.3 At the residential development area, the depth of topsoil dredged from each fishpond which are going to be filled is about 0.3m. Consequently, the methane generation potential of the sediment (fish pond mud) to be left in place will be estimated based on the sediment layer in the depth of about 0.3m to 2m. As such, the estimated quantity of sediment at the built area is: - Volume of sediment left in-situ at built area = 41,000m2 x (2 - 0.3) m = 69,700m3 7.5.4 SOD represents only a fraction of the organic carbon present in the sediment. The total methane generation potential calculated based on SOD results is usually much lower than that calculated based on the TOC results because TOC is a measure of the total organic carbon whereas some of it may not be biodegradable. SOD results, which measure the biodegradable portion of the organic matters in the sediment, provide a more realistic assessment comparing with those estimated using TOC results. 7.5.5 However, as a prudent approach, the estimation of methane generation potential for the proposed development would be based on both TOC and SOD in the Study.
Recommended publications
  • Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Guidance Manual
    September 2002 RG-379 (Revised) Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Guidance Manual Water Supply Division printed on recycled paper TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Guidance Manual Prepared by Water Supply Division RG-379 (Revised) September 2002 Robert J. Huston, Chairman R. B. “Ralph” Marquez, Commissioner Kathleen Hartnett White, Commissioner Jeffrey A. Saitas, Executive Director Authorization to use or reproduce any original material contained in this publication—that is, not obtained from other sources—is freely granted. The commission would appreciate acknowledgment. Copies of this publication are available for public use through the Texas State Library, other state depository libraries, and the TCEQ Library, in compli- ance with state depository law. For more information on TCEQ publications call 512/239-0028 or visit our Web site at: www.tceq.state.tx.us/publications Published and distributed by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality PO Box 13087 Austin TX 78711-3087 The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality was formerly called the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission. The TCEQ is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. The agency does not allow discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, sexual orientation or veteran status. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, this document may be requested in alternate formats by contacting the TCEQ at 512/239-0028, Fax 239-4488, or 1-800-RELAY-TX (TDD), or by writing
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Atmospheric Total Organic Carbon (TOC) – Paving The
    Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-1055 Manuscript under review for journal Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discussion started: 12 October 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. Estimation of atmospheric total organic carbon (TOC) – paving the path towards carbon budget closure Mingxi Yang1*, Zoë L. Fleming2& 5 1 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, United Kingdom 2 National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, UK, United Kingdom * Correspondence to M. Yang ([email protected]) & Now at Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR2), Departamento de Geofísica, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile 10 Abstract. The atmosphere contains a rich variety of reactive organic compounds, including gaseous volatile organic carbon (VOCs), carbonaceous aerosols, and other organic compounds at varying volatility. Here we present measurements of atmospheric non-methane total organic carbon plus carbon monoxide (TOC+CO) during August-September 2016 from a coastal 15 city in the southwest United Kingdom. TOC+CO was substantially elevated during the day on weekdays (occasionally over 2 ppm C) as a result of local anthropogenic activity. On weekends and holidays, with a mean (standard error) of 102 (8) ppb C, TOC+CO was lower and showed much less diurnal variability. Excluding weekday daytime, TOC+CO was significantly lower when winds were coming off the Atlantic Ocean than when winds were coming off land. By subtracting the estimated CO from TOC+CO, we constrain the mean (uncertainty) TOC in marine air to be around 19 (±≥8) ppb C during this period. A proton- 20 transfer-reaction mass spectrometer (PTR-MS) was deployed at the same time, detecting a large range of organic compounds (oxygenated VOCs, biogenic VOCs, aromatics, dimethyl sulfide).
    [Show full text]
  • E.’S Responses ~(Continued)
    : I’able K-3. ,Scnping stat~nts and EIS sectimns or .~E.’s responses ~(continued) COnunent scoping nuinber :Stateilmnt topic EIS section or DOE comnt h at this tti want to reiter&e that the Enviro~ntal l~act Statement should not represent. a legalistic charade ..but a sin. cere commitment to seek and evaluate pertinent in for~t ion. Obviously, any Envirocnnental. Assemnt- which led to the Find- ing of No Significant .l~act needs to be reviewed, evaluated and expanded upon, with full regard to the in~t of a broad range of interests, incl”di”g state agenciea,. the: academic comunit y, public interest groups, and private c iti-zens. We muld like to offer some co-”ts: on the in format io” euppl=ied by 00E relative to the probable contents. of the EIS. In the category of production alternatives: : It wuld seem L Need .Section 1.1 ., important tO. re-evaluate the ,need for i~reased protict ion,~nd %e Commnt D1 make every attempt to ::scale dom those need8. It is ine8ca~ able that the quest ion. af the.,need .to prodca plutoniun ia part of the greater ongoing natic,”al.?security debate. If it is indeed. essential that plutoniun: probct ion be stepped up, the Alternatives Saction 2.1 viable? alternatives should be thoroughly explored in the EIS. In the category of socioeconamics: A broad consideration of %cioeconomic .%ction 5.2.1 the state needs to be incorporated, beyond the immdiate jobs effects :-at SiU during construction and as .an ongoing operation. South Carolina has trenmndous potential for no-nuclear economic.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Dynamics of Subtropical Wetland Communities in South Florida DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Require
    Carbon Dynamics of Subtropical Wetland Communities in South Florida DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jorge Andres Villa Betancur Graduate Program in Environmental Science The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: William J. Mitsch, Co-advisor Gil Bohrer, Co-advisor James Bauer Jay Martin Copyrighted by Jorge Andres Villa Betancur 2014 Abstract Emission and uptake of greenhouse gases and the production and transport of dissolved organic matter in different wetland plant communities are key wetland functions determining two important ecosystem services, climate regulation and nutrient cycling. The objective of this dissertation was to study the variation of methane emissions, carbon sequestration and exports of dissolved organic carbon in wetland plant communities of a subtropical climate in south Florida. The plant communities selected for the study of methane emissions and carbon sequestration were located in a natural wetland landscape and corresponded to a gradient of inundation duration. Going from the wettest to the driest conditions, the communities were designated as: deep slough, bald cypress, wet prairie, pond cypress and hydric pine flatwood. In the first methane emissions study, non-steady-state rigid chambers were deployed at each community sequentially at three different times of the day during a 24- month period. Methane fluxes from the different communities did not show a discernible daily pattern, in contrast to a marked increase in seasonal emissions during inundation. All communities acted at times as temporary sinks for methane, but overall were net -2 -1 sources. Median and mean + standard error fluxes in g CH4-C.m .d were higher in the deep slough (11 and 56.2 + 22.1), followed by the wet prairie (9.01 and 53.3 + 26.6), bald cypress (3.31 and 5.54 + 2.51) and pond cypress (1.49, 4.55 + 3.35) communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Fraction of Organic Carbon RISC Nondefault Option
    Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Land Quality 100 N. Senate Indianapolis, IN 46204-2251 GUIDANCE OLQ PH: (317) 232-8941 Indiana Department of Environmental Management Office of Land Quality Determining the Fraction of Organic Carbon RISC Nondefault Option Background Soil can be a complex mixture of mineral-derived compounds and organic matter. The ratios of each component can vary widely depending on the type of soil being investigated. Soil organic matter is a term used by agronomists for the total organic portion of the soil and is derived from decomposed plant matter, microorganisms, and animal residues. The decomposition process can create complex high molecular weight biopolymers (e.g., humic acid) as well as simpler organic compounds (decomposed lignin or cellulose). Only the simpler organic compounds contribute to the fraction of organic carbon. There is not a rigorous definition of the fraction of organic carbon (Foc). However, it can be thought of as the portion of the organic matter that is available to adsorb the organic contaminants of concern. The higher the organic carbon content, the more organic chemicals may be adsorbed to the soil and the less of those chemicals will be available to leach to the ground water. A nondefault option in the Risk Integrated System of Closure (RISC) is to use Foc in the Soil to Ground Water Partitioning Model to calculate a site specific migration to ground water closure level. In the Soil to Ground Water Partition Model, the coefficient, Kd, for organic compounds is the Foc multiplied by the chemical-specific soil organic carbon water partition coefficient, Koc.
    [Show full text]
  • A Diurnal Carbon Engine Explains 13C-Enriched Carbonates
    A diurnal carbon engine explains 13C-enriched carbonates without increasing the global production of oxygen Emily C. Geymana,1 and Adam C. Maloofa aDepartment of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 Edited by Donald E. Canfield, Institute of Biology and Nordic Center for Earth Evolution, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M., Denmark, and approved October 8, 2019 (received for review May 21, 2019) In the past 3 billion years, significant volumes of carbonate processes can be constrained by visualizing the carbon evolution with high carbon-isotopic (δ13C) values accumulated on shallow of banktop seawater in a Deffeyes diagram (9) (Fig. 2B), since continental shelves. These deposits frequently are interpreted each mechanism induces a characteristic change in DIC and total as records of elevated global organic carbon burial. However, alkalinity (TA) (Table 1). Observations of TOC (5) and DIC vs. through the stoichiometry of primary production, organic carbon TA (7) from the GBB constrain the relative sizes of the net car- burial releases a proportional amount of O2, predicting unrealis- bonate, gas-exchange, and organic fluxes to be 62, 37, and <1%, tic rises in atmospheric pO2 during the 1 to 100 million year-long respectively (Fig. 2). Although the net burial of organic matter positive δ13C excursions that punctuate the geological record. is close to zero, the flux of carbon between organic matter and This carbon–oxygen paradox assumes that the δ13C of shallow the DIC pool over the course of a single diurnal (24-h) cycle water carbonates reflects the δ13C of global seawater-dissolved can exceed the gross atmospheric and carbonate fluxes by over inorganic carbon (DIC).
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Best Practices for Ocean CO2 Measurements
    Guide to Best Practices for Ocean C0 for to Best Practices Guide 2 probe Measurments to digital thermometer thermometer probe to e.m.f. measuring HCl/NaCl system titrant burette out to thermostat bath combination electrode In from thermostat bath mL Metrohm Dosimat STIR Guide to Best Practices for 2007 This Guide contains the most up-to-date information available on the Ocean CO2 Measurements chemistry of CO2 in sea water and the methodology of determining carbon system parameters, and is an attempt to serve as a clear and PICES SPECIAL PUBLICATION 3 unambiguous set of instructions to investigators who are setting up to SPECIAL PUBLICATION PICES IOCCP REPORT No. 8 analyze these parameters in sea water. North Pacific Marine Science Organization 3 PICES SP3_Cover.indd 1 12/13/07 4:16:07 PM Publisher Citation Instructions North Pacific Marine Science Organization Dickson, A.G., Sabine, C.L. and Christian, J.R. (Eds.) 2007. P.O. Box 6000 Guide to Best Practices for Ocean CO2 Measurements. Sidney, BC V8L 4B2 PICES Special Publication 3, 191 pp. Canada www.pices.int Graphic Design Cover and Tabs Caveat alkemi creative This report was developed under the guidance of the Victoria, BC, Canada PICES Science Board and its Section on Carbon and climate. The views expressed in this report are those of participating scientists under their responsibilities. ISSN: 1813-8519 ISBN: 1-897176-07-4 This book is printed on FSC certified paper. The cover contains 10% post-consumer recycled content. PICES SP3_Cover.indd 2 12/13/07 4:16:11 PM Guide to Best Practices for Ocean CO2 Measurements PICES SPECIAL PUBLICATION 3 IOCCP REPORT No.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Ocean's Biological Carbon Pump in the Past: Do We Have the Right Tools?
    Manuscript prepared for Earth-Science Reviews Date: 3 March 2017 Understanding the ocean’s biological carbon pump in the past: Do we have the right tools? Dominik Hülse1, Sandra Arndt1, Jamie D. Wilson1, Guy Munhoven2, and Andy Ridgwell1, 3 1School of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, Clifton, Bristol BS8 1SS, UK 2Institute of Astrophysics and Geophysics, University of Liège, B-4000 Liège, Belgium 3Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA Correspondence to: D. Hülse ([email protected]) Keywords: Biological carbon pump; Earth system models; Ocean biogeochemistry; Marine sedi- ments; Paleoceanography Abstract. The ocean is the biggest carbon reservoir in the surficial carbon cycle and, thus, plays a crucial role in regulating atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Arguably, the most important single com- 5 ponent of the oceanic carbon cycle is the biologically driven sequestration of carbon in both organic and inorganic form- the so-called biological carbon pump. Over the geological past, the intensity of the biological carbon pump has experienced important variability linked to extreme climate events and perturbations of the global carbon cycle. Over the past decades, significant progress has been made in understanding the complex process interplay that controls the intensity of the biological 10 carbon pump. In addition, a number of different paleoclimate modelling tools have been developed and applied to quantitatively explore the biological carbon pump during past climate perturbations and its possible feedbacks on the evolution of the global climate over geological timescales. Here we provide the first, comprehensive overview of the description of the biological carbon pumpin these paleoclimate models with the aim of critically evaluating their ability to represent past marine 15 carbon cycle dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Measurement of Total Organic Carbon in Soil Using Sciaps Z-300 Handheld LIBS
    rev 12/18 Rapid Measurement of Total Organic Carbon in Soil Using SciAps Z-300 Handheld LIBS Introduction Researchers in the soil sciences and agriculture now have a new Data option for measuring Soil Organic Carbon (SOC). In collabora- tion with the Agricultural Laboratory Proficiency Program (ALP), The soils in this study came from diverse regions across the U.S. SciAps presents the results of a comprehensive study of soil from and Canada, representing many different soil types and properties across the United States and Canada. This case study describes (Table 1). These soils also spanned a range of usage sites includ- how a diverse group of soils was incorporated into one standard ing: pasture, fallow, forest, corn, grains, potatoes, soybeans, fruits, calibration to provide a fast and accurate measurement of SOC rice, and cotton. with handheld LIBS. Recent interest in measuring SOC has increased in the sectors of Property Minimum Value Maximum Value soil health and carbon sequestration. SOC represents the frac- SOC 0.25% 6.73% tion of carbon in soil that comes from the biological input of plants and other living organisms. This contrasts with the Soil SIC (From CaCO3) 0.01% 1.49% Inorganic Carbon (SIC) fraction that results from carbonates Sand 9.58% 91.93% being present in the soil. SOC tends to fluctuate much more Silt 4.00% 66.00% rapidly than SIC and is more easily affected by different land Clay 3.90% 45.50% management practices. Understanding how SOC changes over Total Nitrogen 0.02% 1.98% time and through different management practices has given Cation-Exchange Capacity 1.87% 32.72% rise to demand for portable analytical techniques to measure SOC outside of a lab setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Atmospheric Total Organic Carbon (TOC) – Paving the Path Towards Carbon Budget Closure
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 459–471, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-459-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Estimation of atmospheric total organic carbon (TOC) – paving the path towards carbon budget closure Mingxi Yang1 and Zoë L. Fleming2,a 1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK 2National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS), Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK anow at: Center for Climate and Resilience Research (CR2), Departamento de Geofísica, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile Correspondence: Mingxi Yang ([email protected]) Received: 8 October 2018 – Discussion started: 12 October 2018 Revised: 15 December 2018 – Accepted: 18 December 2018 – Published: 14 January 2019 Abstract. The atmosphere contains a rich variety of reactive butions from a number of known organic compounds present organic compounds, including gaseous volatile organic car- in marine air that were not detected by the PTR-MS are as- bon (VOCs), carbonaceous aerosols, and other organic com- sessed within the context of the TOC budget. Finally, we note pounds at varying volatility. Here we present a novel and that the use of a short, heated sample tube can improve the simple approach to measure atmospheric non-methane total transmission of organics to the analyzer, while operating our organic carbon (TOC) based on catalytic oxidation of organ- system alternately with and without a particle filter should ics in bulk air to carbon dioxide. This method shows little enable a better separation of semi-volatile and particulate or- sensitivity towards humidity and near 100 % oxidation effi- ganics from the VOCs within the TOC budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Carbon Sequestration
    TERRESTRIAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION Field Guide for Sampling and Analysis for Sites Remediated with Soil Amendments United States Environmental Protection Agency | Solid Waste and Emergency Response | EPA-542-R-10-002 | June 2010 Version 1, www.cluin.org/ecotools Field Guide, Version 1, June 2010 TERRESTRIAL CARBON SEQUESTRATION: Field Guide for Sampling and Analysis at Sites Remediated with Soil Amendments Table of Contents FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. ii Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Step 1. Document Site-Specific Information ................................................................................ 3 Step 2. Plan for Data Collection .................................................................................................... 4 Step 3. Collect and Analyze Samples ............................................................................................5 Step 4. Manage and Interpret Data ................................................................................................ 7 Pilot Application of the Field Guide............................................................................................... 8 References....................................................................................................................................... 8 Table 1. Analytical Measurements for
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary: Wastewater Treatment and Collection System Terms
    Glossary September 2011 Wastewater Treatment Collection System &Terms Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4194 wq-wwtp8-20 Contents Wastewater Treatment and Collection System Terms A ........... 3-6 G ...... 24-25 M ..... 29-31 S ........ 42-51 B ........... 7-9 H ....... 26-27 N ....... 32-33 T ........ 52-54 C ....... 10-15 I ......... 27-28 O ...... 33-35 U ............ 54 D ....... 15-19 J ............. 28 P ....... 35-40 V ....... 55-56 E ........ 19-21 K ............ 28 Q ............ 40 W ...... 56-57 F ........ 21-24 L ............. 29 R ....... 40-42 Z ............. 57 Acknowledgement Special thanks to Ken Kerri at California State University, Sacramento, for use of the glossary that appears in his self-study training courses, “Operation and Maintenance of Wastewater Collection Systems” and “Operation of Wastewater Treatment Plants.” A special acknowledgement to the Water Environment Federation for the use of their wastewater glossary for some of the definitions in this manual. Contributors Kay Curtin Steve Duerre Gene Erickson Editing and Graphic Design Nancy Ellefson This document was printed on 30 percent post-consumer recycled paper manufactured without the use of elemental chlorine. 2 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency | All rights reserved. Wastewater Treatment and Collection System Terms A absorption The taking up of one substance into the body of another by chemical or molecular action after the adsorbtion process. accuracy In physical measurements, it is the degree of agreement between the quantity measured and the actual quantity. It should not be confused with ‘precision,’ which denotes the reproducibility of the measurement. acid A substance that yields hydrogen ions when dissolved in water resulting in a pH of less than 7; it can react with bases and certain metals to form salts.
    [Show full text]