DOCSLIB.ORG

THIS DEED of EASEMENT, Made This

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THIS DEED OF EASEMENT, made this _________ day of ___________________, 2010, by and between THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CARROLL COUNTY, a body corporate and politic of the State of Maryland, including successors and assigns, Grantor; and THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND, a body corporate and politic of the State of Maryland, Grantee. WHEREAS, the County Commissioners of Carroll County propose to acquire certain easements located in the Seventh (7th) Election District of Carroll County, Maryland; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to the conveyance of the easements as hereinafter described. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DEED OF EASEMENT WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the said Grantor does hereby grant and convey unto THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND, a body corporate and politic of the State of Maryland, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement to allow the location, relocation, maintenance, repair, enlargement and replacement of pipes, headwalls, inlet ditches, outlet ditches, culverts, manholes, inlets, stormwater management, swales, backwater areas, and other drainage features upon, in, on, above, across, through, under and over such portion of Grantor’s land situate on Maryland Route No. 97, containing 1.6951 acres of land, more or less, and identified as “Construction Easement & Perpetual Maintenance Easement For Retrofit of Ex. SWM Pond” on a Plan entitled “WESTMINSTER HIGH SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION & PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT FOR SWM POND RETROFIT” (hereinafter referred to as “Plan”), which Plan is incorporated herein by reference, and on an Exhibit Plat entitled “WESTMINSTER HIGH SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION & PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT FOR SWM POND RETROFIT” (hereinafter referred to as “Plat”), which Plat is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. AND the said Grantor further grants unto THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND, a body corporate and politic of the State of Maryland, its successors and assigns, an easement to allow for the stockpile and disposal of soil materials and to act as a staging area during construction, in, on, upon, above, across, through, under and over such portion of Grantor’s property containing 1.0085 acres of land, more or less, and identified as “Temporary Construction Easement” on the Plan and Plat; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that said temporary construction easement shall automatically terminate and revert unto Grantor two years after the construction is completed and the site is stabilized. AND the County agrees to reseed and mulch any disturbed areas associated with the construction, which obligation shall continue until such time as the disturbed areas have an established uniform two-inch stand of grass with a coverage rate of 95%. BEING a portion of the same land conveyed unto Grantor by Deed from The County Commissioners of Carroll County dated February 29, 1968, and recorded among the Land Records of Carroll County, in Book 436, Page 628 &c.; also known as the Westminster High School at 1225 Washington Road, Westminster, Maryland, 21157. SUBJECT, HOWEVER, to the Grantor’s right to use the easement areas described herein following completion of construction for school purposes, provided that such use does not interfere with the Grantee’s use and enjoyment of the easements as provided herein. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above described easements unto THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND, its successors and assigns. AND the said Grantor hereby covenants that it has not done or suffered to be done any act, matter or thing whatsoever to encumber the easements hereby conveyed; that it will warrant specially the easements hereby granted and that it will execute such further assurances of the same as may be requisite. Furthermore, it is the intent of the parties that these covenants be deemed to be and are construed as real covenants running with the land. All subsequent owners of the property burdened by this easement shall assume the position of “Grantor” for the purposes of this easement at the time such owners acquire their title to the property. AND the parties, for themselves, their heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns further covenant and agree as follows: 1. That the Stormwater Management Facility shown on the Plan shall be constructed by the Grantee in a good and workmanlike manner and maintained by the County pursuant to Chapter 191 of the Code of Public Local Laws and Ordinances of Carroll County. 2. Grantor or its authorized representative shall be responsible for the routine maintenance (mowing, removal of vegetation and debris) of the Stormwater Management Facility, and the Grantee shall be responsible for the maintenance of the structural elements, including but not limited to the underdrain system, headwalls, inlet ditches, outlet ditches, culverts, manholes, inlets, swales, outlet structures and pipes after the facility is constructed and as-built certifications are accepted by the County, or until the site has an established uniform two-inch stand of grass with a coverage rate of 95%, whichever is later. In addition to the foregoing, the Grantee shall be responsible to cause the contractor(s) who construct the stormwater management facilities to perform any work on the stormwater management facilities that is covered by construction warranties. 3. Grantor and Grantor's successor and assigns may not erect structures (including fences, retaining walls, and sheds of any kind) or perform earthwork which could result in redirection of surface runoff within the Stormwater Management Facility. Damages caused by Grantor shall be repaired by Grantor in a timely manner not exceeding thirty (30) days without express written approval of Grantee. Grantee may not erect a fence around the Stormwater Management Facility without obtaining the express prior written approval of Grantor. 2 4. Grantee or its authorized representative shall have the right to enter on the Grantor's land from Maryland Route 97 or Maryland Route 32 from time to time for the purposes of inspection, maintenance, repair, and enforcement of the easement, covenants, conditions, limitations, and restrictions herein contained after providing notice to the school office of their intention to enter the Grantor’s land, provided that prior notice shall not be required in the event of an emergency. Any representative of the Grantee shall display identification. 5. That this easement does not grant the public in general any right of access to or any right or use of the above described land. 6. The perpetual maintenance easement granted herein shall be in perpetuity, unless released by Grantee; the temporary construction easement granted herein shall automatically terminate and revert unto Grantor as provided herein. AS WITNESS the hands and seals of the Grantor and Grantee herein. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND, a body corporate and politic of the State of Maryland, ATTEST: _______________________________ ______________________________(SEAL) Barbara J. Shreeve, President _______________________________ ______________________________(SEAL) Charles I. Ecker Superintendent of Schools Reviewed as to form and legal sufficiency this _____ day of ____________, 2010. _______________________________ Robert D. Porter, Esquire Attorney for Board of Education ACCEPTED AND APPROVED BY: THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND, a body corporate and politic of the State of Maryland ____________________________________ BY: Steven C. Horn, Director Department of Planning 3 Approved for legal sufficiency: _____________________________ Terri A. Jones Deputy County Attorney NO TITLE EXAMINATION I HEREBY CERTIFY that this document was prepared by or under the supervision of an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Maryland. _________________________________ Terri A. Jones, Deputy County Attorney TAJ\dmg\attorney\Agreements\Patapsco\SWEasement-WestminsterH.S. - 1280-0016 – 11/03/09 RETURN TO: DEPT. OF COUNTY ATTORNEY, 225 N. CENTER STREET, WESTMINSTER, MD 21157 G:\files\Rdp.gen\5968b.09.doc 4 5 5 of 5 5.
Recommended publications
  • Directions to Rockburn Branch Park

    Directions to Rockburn Branch Park

    DIRECTIONS: River Hill June 24 6050 Daybreak Circle, Clarksville, MD 21029 From Interstate 95, take MD Rt 32 West (Exit 38) toward Columbia to Clarksville. Proceed to MD Rt 32 directions. From Interstate 70, take MD Rt 32 South to Clarksville. From MD Rt 32, Exit onto MD Rt 108 (Exit 20) East toward Columbia. Go approximately 1/4 mile to the River Hill Village Center, and turn right onto Great Star Dr. AVA-264 Turn left onto Daybreak Cir. Park in the Village Center parking lot near Giant Food. Presents Three Saturday Morning Harper’s Choice August 5 5440 Old Tucker Row, Columbia, MD 21044 From Interstate 95: take Exit 38 (Route 32) west towards Columbia for 4 miles to Cedar Lane. Turn Right on Cedar Lane and follow to end. Turn Left, then right to enter Harpers Choice Village Center. From Route 70, take Route 32 east towards Columbia for 12 miles to Cedar Lane. In Columbia, Howard County, Maryland Turn Left on Cedar Lane and follow to end. Turn Left, then right to enter and park at the Harpers Choice Village Center. June 24 River Hill AT2017/107720; 10 km/5 km; Trail Rating 2A Owen Brown September 9 7246 Cradlerock Way, Columbia, Maryland 21045 August 5 Harper’s Choice From Baltimore or Washington: Take I-95 to Maryland Route 32, Exit 38B toward Columbia AT2017/107751; 10 km/5 km; Trail Rating 2A Take Exit 38B onto Route 32 W, toward Columbia 1.6 miles. Take the first Exit onto Broken Land Parkway north toward Owen September 9 Owen Brown Brown (go about .7 miles).
  • NCHRP Report 350, Which Specifies Speeds, Angles of Collision, and Vehicle Types, As Well As Defines Success Or Failure in the Testing

    NCHRP Report 350, Which Specifies Speeds, Angles of Collision, and Vehicle Types, As Well As Defines Success Or Failure in the Testing

    93 H. CASE STUDIES The following is a selection of case studies that illustrate application of the principles and thought process A B C D E F G H behind CSD/CSS. The case stud- Effective Reflecting Achieving Ensuring Safe ies were assembled from materials Introduction About this Decision Community Environmental and Feasible Organizational Case Appendices and interviews conducted with pilot to CSD Guide Making Values Sensitivity Solutions Needs Studies state representatives, as well as with Management Structure other agencies contacted during the research project. The case studies Problem Definition are geographically diverse. They Project Development and illustrate a wide range of project Evaluation Framework contexts, from rural roads to urban Alternatives Development streets. They demonstrate that one can be context sensitive when dealing Alternatives Screening with a freeway, an arterial, or a local Evaluation and Selection road. In one case, they show that the Implementation mission of a transportation agency ���������� can and should go beyond providing for safe and efficient transportation. They represent both small projects and substantial efforts. Most of all, the case studies show how project success can be achieved by following the framework discussed here, and applying the right resources to solve a problem. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 480 Section H: Case Studies 94 This page intentionally left blank Section H: Case Studies A Guide to Best Practices for Achieving Context Sensitive Solutions 95 CASE STUDY NO. 1 MERRITT PARKWAY GATEWAY PROJECT GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT Both the volume of traffic and its character and operations SETTING have changed over time. The Parkway now carries traffic The Merritt Parkway (The Parkway) was constructed in in excess of 50,000 vehicles per day in some segments.
  • Existing Conditions Evaluation

    Existing Conditions Evaluation

    Jabez Branch 3 Watershed Restoration Implementation Plan Existing Conditions Evaluation April 2015 Prepared For: 707 North Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 Prepared by: Contents Introduction: ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Table 1: Jabez Branch 3 Watershed Land Use Data ................................................................................. 4 Background: .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Stream Assessment: ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Procedure: ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Table 2: Rapid Stream Characterization Summary Table ........................................................................ 8 Reach 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Reach 2 ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 UT 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 10
  • “Introduction to Mental Health Recovery Including WRAP®”

    “Introduction to Mental Health Recovery Including WRAP®”

    Registration Directions “Introduction to Mental Health ® The Meeting House Recovery including WRAP ” 5885 Robert Oliver Place March 12 & 13, 2012 Village of Oakland Mills 8:30 am - 5:30 pm Columbia, Maryland Registration 8:00 am - 8:30 am 410-730-4090 Cost: $229 per person. Space is limited to 30, please register early. q Enclosed is my check for $229. Please register me for the March 12 & 13, 2012 training. q Enclosed is a purchase order for this training. Please register me for the March 12 & 13, 2012 From Baltimore or Washington: training and send me an invoice for payment. 1. Take I-95 to Maryland Route 175 2. Exit onto westbound Route 175, toward Columbia Please complete a separate form for each individual. 3. Turn left at Thunder Hill Road Name ____________________________________ 4. Thunder Hill Road dead-ends at The Meeting House; the parking lot is on the Organization _______________________________ opposite side of the building “Introduction to Address ___________________________________ From points north or south of Columbia: City __________________ Zip Code ___________ 1. Take US 29 to Maryland Route 175 2. Exit onto eastbound Route 175, toward Jessup Mental Health Recovery Phone ____________________________________ 3. Turn right at the first traffic light onto ® Thunder Hill Road including WRAP ” E-mail _________________________________ 4. Thunder Hill Road dead-ends at The q Vegetarian Meal Meeting House; the parking lot is on the with Denise Camp, opposite side of the building ® ® q Special accommodations, i.e. hearing interpreter. WRAP Coordinator, WRAP Outreach Project (10 day notice is required) From Maryland’s Eastern Shore: ____________________________________________ 1.
  • The Patapsco Regional Greenway the Patapsco Regional Greenway

    The Patapsco Regional Greenway the Patapsco Regional Greenway

    THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS While the Patapsco Regional Greenway Concept Plan and Implementation Matrix is largely a community effort, the following individuals should be recognized for their input and contribution. Mary Catherine Cochran, Patapsco Heritage Greenway Dan Hudson, Maryland Department of Natural Resources Rob Dyke, Maryland Park Service Joe Vogelpohl, Maryland Park Service Eric Crawford, Friends of Patapsco Valley State Park and Mid-Atlantic Off-Road Enthusiasts (MORE) Ed Dixon, MORE Chris Eatough, Howard County Office of Transportation Tim Schneid, Baltimore Gas & Electric Pat McDougall, Baltimore County Recreation & Parks Molly Gallant, Baltimore City Recreation & Parks Nokomis Ford, Carroll County Department of Planning The Patapsco Regional Greenway 2 THE PATAPSCO REGIONAL GREENWAY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................4 2 BENEFITS OF WALKING AND BICYCLING ...............14 3 EXISTING PLANS ...............................................18 4 TREATMENTS TOOLKIT .......................................22 5 GREENWAY MAPS .............................................26 6 IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX .................................88 7 FUNDING SOURCES ...........................................148 8 CONCLUSION ....................................................152 APPENDICES ........................................................154 Appendix A: Community Feedback .......................................155 Appendix B: Survey
  • HO-642 Shipley House, Site (In Alpha Ridge Park)

    HO-642 Shipley House, Site (In Alpha Ridge Park)

    HO-642 Shipley House, site (in Alpha Ridge Park) Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 05-03-2004 INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY/DISTRICT MARYLAND HI STCJR I CAL TRUST INTERNAL NR-ELIGIBI LITY REVIEW FORM Property/District Name: Shipley House Survey Nl.ri>er: H0-642 Project: Aloha Ridge Park Agency: S/DNR CPOS) Site visit by MHT Staff: _L no yes Name Date Eligibility rec011111ended Eligibility not recOlllllended _x_ Criteria: _A _B _c _D Considerations: _A _B _c _D _E _F _G _None Justification for decision: (Use continuation sheet if necessary and attach map) The Shipley House and its related outbui !dings are located on the south side of Old Frederick road CMD Rt.
  • Zachary Hicks Spring 2016 MRED Graduate Capsto

    Zachary Hicks Spring 2016 MRED Graduate Capsto

    Prepared for: Colvin Institute University of Maryland, College Park Prepared by: Zachary Hicks Spring 2016 MRED Graduate Capstone Mentor: Tim Pula Architects: Aren Knudsen, Christiane Machado, and Abby Winter Effective Date: May 16, 2016 Site Inspection: February 3, 2016 Table of Contents 1. General Context .................................................................................................................... 5 A. Discussion of General Context Analysis .......................................................................... 5 B. Property Location ............................................................................................................. 5 C. Property Characteristics ................................................................................................... 7 D. Traffic ............................................................................................................................... 8 E. Pedestrian Flow .................................................................................................................... 9 F. Transit .................................................................................................................................. 9 G. Physical Geography ........................................................................................................ 11 H. Community Benefits ...................................................................................................... 12 I. Architectural Character .....................................................................................................
  • Archeological Survey of Maryland Route 32 Between Pindell School Road and Maryland Route 108, Howard County, Maryland

    Archeological Survey of Maryland Route 32 Between Pindell School Road and Maryland Route 108, Howard County, Maryland

    1 Patterson Par!, & M-.-^v DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION OF ARCHEOLOGY FILE REPORT NUMBER 238 ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MARYLAND ROUTE 32 BETWEEN PINDELL SCHOOL ROAD AND MARYLAND ROUTE 108, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND by RICHARD G. ERVIN Report submitted to the Maryland State Highway Administration Contract Number HO 292-202-770 HO 1989 36 I •• » I. .' - -!>t£: V) f "')•'•:>","'I :i".- ':Ti t.r L-rn Frontispiece: Painting of the mill at Simpsonville as it appeared in the early 20th century. The artist painted the mill while recuperating from an automobile accident near Simpsonville. The original of this painting and the one in Figure 12 are in the possession of Walter Iglehart, whose father operated the mill in the early 20th century. Photograph courtesy of Lee Preston. -u - Ho DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES £ . 1 MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DIVISION OF ARCHEOLOGY FILE REPORT NUMBER 238 ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF MARYLAND ROUTE 32 BETWEEN PINDELL SCHOOL ROAD AND MARYLAND ROUTE 108, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND by RICHARD G. ERVIN Report submitted to the Maryland State Highway Administration Contract Number HO 292-202-770 1989 Archeological Survey of Maryland Route 32 Between Pindell School Road and Maryland Route 108, Howard County, Maryland by Richard G. Ervin Division of Archeology Maryland Geological Survey ABSTRACT Archeologists surveyed five proposed alignments of Maryland Route 32 between Pindell School Road and Maryland Route 108, finding three archeological sites in the project area. The Spring Hill site (18HO148) is a possible late 19th century rural residential structure location. The site is outside the proposed Alternate B right-of-way, and it is recommended that it be avoided during construction.
  • Fairground Village Center

    Fairground Village Center

    EXCLUSIVE OFFERING FAIRGROUND VILLAGE CENTER WESTMINSTER, MD LOCATION OVERVIEW WINTER’S MILL HIGH SCHOOL 49,905 AADT | CROSSROADS SQUARE | 140 | 140 VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER | 1 MILE MALCOM DRIVE DOWNTOWN WESTMINSTER 28,947 AADT | FAIRGROUND VILLAGE | Carroll Arthritis, P.A 140 VILLAGE ROAD 3,913 AADT | 140 VILLAGE RD CENTER | 1 MILE CARROLL HOSPITAL EDGE | FAIRGROUND VILLAGE CENTER EDGE | FAIRGROUND VILLAGE CENTER 2 3 LOCATION SUMMARY EMPLOYMENT DRIVERS York Chambersburg McConnellsburg Fort Loudon Westminster is a city in northern Maryland, a suburb of Balti- Fayetteville 30 83 Red Lion more, and is the seat of Carroll County. The city is an outlying Quarryville community within the Baltimore-Towson, MD MSA, which is Spring Grove 81 15 part of a greater Washington-Baltimore-Northern Virginia, West Virginia CSA. Mont Alto Gettysburg Mercersburg Westminster offers four primary highways that serve the city. The most prominent of these is Maryland Route 140, which McSherrystown Hanover follows an east-southeast to west-northwest alignment across Greencastle Oxford the area. To the southeast, MD 140 connects to Baltimore, Shrewbury while north-westward, it passes through Taneytown on its Carroll Valley 35 Miles Waynesboro Stewartstown way to Emmitsburg. Maryland Route 97 is the next most im- Littlestown New Freedom portant highway serving the city, providing the most direct Blue Ridge Summit route southward towards Washington, D.C. Two other pri- MARYLAND-PENNSYLVANIA LINE mary highways, Maryland Route 27 and Maryland Route 31 Sabillasville Emmitsburg 23 Miles provide connections to surrounding nearby towns. Maugansville 97 Westminster ranks #5 in the best places to live in Carroll Manchester Smithsburg Taneytown County according to Niche.com, due to it’s affordability, Hagerstown traffic free commutes, and location to major employment.
  • Robert Moton Elementary School Open Space Classroom Enclosures

    Robert Moton Elementary School Open Space Classroom Enclosures

    Carroll County Public Schools Robert Moton Elementary School Open Space Classroom Enclosures Schematic Design Submission January 25, 2012 750 E. Pratt Street, Suite 1100 Baltimore, Maryland 21202 p. 410.837.7311 f. 410.837.6530 . SCHEMATIC DESIGN SUBMISSION ROBERT MOTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CARROLL COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS OPEN SPACE CLASSROOM ENCLOSURES Table of Contents Design Team ................................................................................................................................ 2 Construction Planning Committee ................................................................................................ 3 Narratives: Architectural................................................................................................................................... 4 Site/Civil ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Structural ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Mechanical .................................................................................................................................. 11 Electrical ...................................................................................................................................... 17 Construction Cost ....................................................................................................................... 23 Space Summary ........................................................................................................................
  • HO-276 Mt. Gregory United Methodist Church

    HO-276 Mt. Gregory United Methodist Church

    HO-276 Mt. Gregory United Methodist Church Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 02-07-2013 Maryland Historical Trust Inventory No, HO-276 Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Form 1. Name of Property (indicate preferred name) historic Mount Gregory United Methodist Church other 2. Location street and number 2325 Maryland Route 97 not for publication city, town Cooksville X vicinity county Howard 3. Owner of Property (give names and mailing addresses of all owners) name Mount Gregory United Methodist Church street and number 2323 Maryland Route 97 telephone 410-489-7526 city, town Cooksville state MD zip code 21723 .4. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc.
  • Annual Development Activity and Disclosure Report

    Annual Development Activity and Disclosure Report

    ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY AND DISCLOSURE REPORT For the Period Ending December 31, 2007 $15,655,000 Anne Arundel County, Maryland National Business Park Project Series 2004 Refunding Bonds Prepared by: MUNICAP, INC. May 6, 2008 DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY AND DISCLOSURE REPORT I. UPDATED INFORMATION 1 II. INTRODUCTION 2 III. DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 4 A. Overview 4 B. Governmental Approvals 4 C. Status of Development 6 D. Public Improvements 11 IV. TRUSTEE ACCOUNTS 14 V. DISTRICT OPERATIONS 15 A. Special Tax Requirement 15 B. Special Taxes Levied and Collected 18 C. Delinquent Special Taxes 18 D. Collection Efforts 18 VI. DISTRICT FINANCIAL INFORMATION 19 A. Fund Balances 19 B. Changes to the Rate and Method of Apportionment 19 C. Changes in the Ad Valorem Tax Rates 19 D. Changes in Assessed Value 19 E. District Special Taxes Levied 21 F. Status of Collection of Ad Valorem and Special Taxes 21 G. Property Ownership 21 H. Land Use Amendments 23 I. Changes to Development 23 J. Debt Service Schedules 23 VII. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS 24 A. Developer’s Significant Events 24 B. Listed Events 25 I. UPDATED INFORMATION Information updated for the quarterly development activity and disclosure report for the period ending September 30, 2006 is as follows: • As of December 31, 2007, the developer reports that the total equity invested in National Business Park by Constellation Real Estate or related entities, including the costs of land acquisition and land & infrastructure improvements was $13,253,511, which remains the same as the previous reporting period. • As of December 31, 2007, the developer reported 1,575,084 square feet of the space within Phase I of National Business Park was leased, which remains the same as the previous reporting period.