Traffic Volume Report
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Directions to Rockburn Branch Park
DIRECTIONS: River Hill June 24 6050 Daybreak Circle, Clarksville, MD 21029 From Interstate 95, take MD Rt 32 West (Exit 38) toward Columbia to Clarksville. Proceed to MD Rt 32 directions. From Interstate 70, take MD Rt 32 South to Clarksville. From MD Rt 32, Exit onto MD Rt 108 (Exit 20) East toward Columbia. Go approximately 1/4 mile to the River Hill Village Center, and turn right onto Great Star Dr. AVA-264 Turn left onto Daybreak Cir. Park in the Village Center parking lot near Giant Food. Presents Three Saturday Morning Harper’s Choice August 5 5440 Old Tucker Row, Columbia, MD 21044 From Interstate 95: take Exit 38 (Route 32) west towards Columbia for 4 miles to Cedar Lane. Turn Right on Cedar Lane and follow to end. Turn Left, then right to enter Harpers Choice Village Center. From Route 70, take Route 32 east towards Columbia for 12 miles to Cedar Lane. In Columbia, Howard County, Maryland Turn Left on Cedar Lane and follow to end. Turn Left, then right to enter and park at the Harpers Choice Village Center. June 24 River Hill AT2017/107720; 10 km/5 km; Trail Rating 2A Owen Brown September 9 7246 Cradlerock Way, Columbia, Maryland 21045 August 5 Harper’s Choice From Baltimore or Washington: Take I-95 to Maryland Route 32, Exit 38B toward Columbia AT2017/107751; 10 km/5 km; Trail Rating 2A Take Exit 38B onto Route 32 W, toward Columbia 1.6 miles. Take the first Exit onto Broken Land Parkway north toward Owen September 9 Owen Brown Brown (go about .7 miles). -
NCHRP Report 350, Which Specifies Speeds, Angles of Collision, and Vehicle Types, As Well As Defines Success Or Failure in the Testing
93 H. CASE STUDIES The following is a selection of case studies that illustrate application of the principles and thought process A B C D E F G H behind CSD/CSS. The case stud- Effective Reflecting Achieving Ensuring Safe ies were assembled from materials Introduction About this Decision Community Environmental and Feasible Organizational Case Appendices and interviews conducted with pilot to CSD Guide Making Values Sensitivity Solutions Needs Studies state representatives, as well as with Management Structure other agencies contacted during the research project. The case studies Problem Definition are geographically diverse. They Project Development and illustrate a wide range of project Evaluation Framework contexts, from rural roads to urban Alternatives Development streets. They demonstrate that one can be context sensitive when dealing Alternatives Screening with a freeway, an arterial, or a local Evaluation and Selection road. In one case, they show that the Implementation mission of a transportation agency ���������� can and should go beyond providing for safe and efficient transportation. They represent both small projects and substantial efforts. Most of all, the case studies show how project success can be achieved by following the framework discussed here, and applying the right resources to solve a problem. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 480 Section H: Case Studies 94 This page intentionally left blank Section H: Case Studies A Guide to Best Practices for Achieving Context Sensitive Solutions 95 CASE STUDY NO. 1 MERRITT PARKWAY GATEWAY PROJECT GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT Both the volume of traffic and its character and operations SETTING have changed over time. The Parkway now carries traffic The Merritt Parkway (The Parkway) was constructed in in excess of 50,000 vehicles per day in some segments. -
Resolution #20-9
BALTIMORE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION BALTIMORE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION BOARD RESOLUTION #20-9 RESOLUTION TO ENDORSE THE UPDATED BALTIMORE REGION COORDINATED PUBLIC TRANSIT – HUMAN SERVICES TRANSPORTATION PLAN WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board (BRTB) is the designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Baltimore region, encompassing the Baltimore Urbanized Area, and includes official representatives of the cities of Annapolis and Baltimore; the counties of Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, Howard, and Queen Anne’s; and representatives of the Maryland Departments of Transportation, the Environment, Planning, the Maryland Transit Administration, Harford Transit; and WHEREAS, the Baltimore Regional Transportation Board as the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Baltimore region, has responsibility under the provisions of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act for developing and carrying out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process for the metropolitan area; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration, a modal division of the U.S. Department of Transportation, requires under FAST Act the establishment of a locally developed, coordinated public transit-human services transportation plan. Previously, under MAP-21, legislation combined the New Freedom Program and the Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program into a new Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program, better known as Section 5310. Guidance on the new program was provided in Federal Transit Administration Circular 9070.1G released on June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Federal Transit Administration requires a plan to be developed and periodically updated by a process that includes representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human services providers and participation by the public. -
Existing Conditions Evaluation
Jabez Branch 3 Watershed Restoration Implementation Plan Existing Conditions Evaluation April 2015 Prepared For: 707 North Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 Prepared by: Contents Introduction: ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Table 1: Jabez Branch 3 Watershed Land Use Data ................................................................................. 4 Background: .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Stream Assessment: ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Procedure: ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Table 2: Rapid Stream Characterization Summary Table ........................................................................ 8 Reach 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 Reach 2 ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 UT 1 ..................................................................................................................................................... 10 -
“Introduction to Mental Health Recovery Including WRAP®”
Registration Directions “Introduction to Mental Health ® The Meeting House Recovery including WRAP ” 5885 Robert Oliver Place March 12 & 13, 2012 Village of Oakland Mills 8:30 am - 5:30 pm Columbia, Maryland Registration 8:00 am - 8:30 am 410-730-4090 Cost: $229 per person. Space is limited to 30, please register early. q Enclosed is my check for $229. Please register me for the March 12 & 13, 2012 training. q Enclosed is a purchase order for this training. Please register me for the March 12 & 13, 2012 From Baltimore or Washington: training and send me an invoice for payment. 1. Take I-95 to Maryland Route 175 2. Exit onto westbound Route 175, toward Columbia Please complete a separate form for each individual. 3. Turn left at Thunder Hill Road Name ____________________________________ 4. Thunder Hill Road dead-ends at The Meeting House; the parking lot is on the Organization _______________________________ opposite side of the building “Introduction to Address ___________________________________ From points north or south of Columbia: City __________________ Zip Code ___________ 1. Take US 29 to Maryland Route 175 2. Exit onto eastbound Route 175, toward Jessup Mental Health Recovery Phone ____________________________________ 3. Turn right at the first traffic light onto ® Thunder Hill Road including WRAP ” E-mail _________________________________ 4. Thunder Hill Road dead-ends at The q Vegetarian Meal Meeting House; the parking lot is on the with Denise Camp, opposite side of the building ® ® q Special accommodations, i.e. hearing interpreter. WRAP Coordinator, WRAP Outreach Project (10 day notice is required) From Maryland’s Eastern Shore: ____________________________________________ 1. -
Norristown Transportation Center to Graterford
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY SUBURBAN TRANSIT AND CONTRACT OPERATIONS ______________________________________ TARIFF NO. 155 SUPPLEMENT NO. 26 ______________________________________ LOCAL RATES OF FARE AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE FURNISHING OF PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION ON REGULAR SCHEDULED SERVICE ______________________________________ ISSUED: March 17, 2010 APPROVED: AMENDED: EFFECTIVE: ISSUED BY: Joseph M. Casey General Manager 1234 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19107-3780 CHANGES MADE BY THIS TARIFF 1. The title cover and related text in sections 3, 4, 10 and 20 has been changed from Suburban Transit Division to Suburban Transit and Contract Operations to reflect the nature of Suburban Transit routes operated by Victory and Frontier Districts, as well as transit services contracted to a private carrier. 2. Fare Zones are revised on the following routes as part of the FY 2012 Annual Service Plan: 92, 95, 98, 115, 119, 127, 130 and 139. New Routes 126 and 133 are included. Routes 304 and 314 would be discontinued. These fare zone changes would take effect upon SEPTA Board approval of the FY 2012 Annual Service Plan and funding availability. 3. Fare Zones are revised on the following routes as part of the FY 2011 Annual Service Plan: 97, 105 and 106. 4. Route 100 is now known as Norristown High Speed Line. 5. All references to 69th Street Terminal are changed to read 69th Street Transportation Center (69th Street TC). 6. Route 129 references to Torresdale have been updated to reflect what is printed on the public timetable and destination signs. 7. Fare zone information is revised for Routes 204, 205 and 306. 8. Information regarding Route 305 has been removed 9. -
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964. -
Click on Directory to Download
2021.directory.pages_Layout 1 10/13/20 10:45 AM Page 5 We hope you find this edion of the Directory of Maryland Community Colleges useful. The Maryland Associaon of Community Colleges (MACC) staff makes every effort to keep this informaon accurate and uptodate. Please help us maintain this valuable resource; if your college’s informaon changes during the year, please send your updates to Jane Thomas at: [email protected] or contact her at 4109748117. Throughout the year, your changes will be made to the online PDF version of the directory that is posted on the MACC website at www.mdacc.org. We appreciate your support and look forward to a successful year ahead for our colleges and the students we serve. i 2021.directory.pages_Layout 1 10/13/20 10:45 AM Page 6 ii 2021.directory.pages_Layout 1 10/13/20 10:46 AM Page 7 Foreword..................................................................................................................... i Purpose, Philosophy, and Mission ............................................................................1 Staff of the Maryland Associaon of Community Colleges.....................................3 Direcons to the MACC office ...................................................................................4 Execuve Commiee .................................................................................................5 Board of Directors ......................................................................................................6 Affinity Groups and Chief Officers.............................................................................7 -
In the United States District Court for the District of Maryland : Lise L
Case 1:04-cv-02983-CCB Document 51 Filed 06/09/05 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND : LISE L. LINTON, ET AL : : v. : Civil No. CCB-04-2983 : MICHAEL A. BRIAND, ET AL : ...o0o... MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, Lise Linton, instituted this suit in Frederick County Circuit Court with her husband, David Linton, claiming negligence and loss of consortium arising out of a car accident that occurred on August 10, 2003 on Maryland Route 140 in Frederick County, Maryland. The Lintons sued Michael Briand (“Briand”), the driver of the automobile, Donita Rockwell (“Rockwell”), Briand’s girlfriend and passenger in the car, and their own insurance company, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (“Progressive”). The defendants removed the case to this court based on diversity jurisdiction. In an amended complaint, David Linton was dismissed as a plaintiff and named as a defendant. Due to her physical and emotional injuries, Lise Linton sued the defendants for $1,500,000 in compensatory damages, plus interest and costs of the suit. Both David Linton and Progressive filed a cross-claim against Briand and Rockwell for contribution and indemnification. Now pending before the court is defendant Rockwell’s motion for summary judgment as to all claims, cross-claims, and third party claims. This matter has been fully briefed and no hearing is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons stated below, Rockwell’s motion will be granted. BACKGROUND At the time of the automobile accident, Briand lived in Milford, New Hampshire and Rockwell Case 1:04-cv-02983-CCB Document 51 Filed 06/09/05 Page 2 of 5 lived in Cleveland, Ohio. -
CARR-202 Avalon
CARR-202 Avalon Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 11-08-2012 NPS Form 10 BOO (3.(2) Expires 10-31-87 United States Department of the Interior CARR-202 National Park Service For NPS U6e on,y National Register of Historic Places received Inventory—Nomination Form date entered See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections 1. Name historic Avalon and or common Avalon 2. Location street & numberpff Maryland Route 31 (New Windsor Road) on Slingluff Ro3g|/A not for publication city, town New Windsor _X_ vicinity of Sixth Congressional District state Maryland code 24 county Carroll code 013 3. -
THIS DEED of EASEMENT, Made This
THIS DEED OF EASEMENT, made this _________ day of ___________________, 2010, by and between THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CARROLL COUNTY, a body corporate and politic of the State of Maryland, including successors and assigns, Grantor; and THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND, a body corporate and politic of the State of Maryland, Grantee. WHEREAS, the County Commissioners of Carroll County propose to acquire certain easements located in the Seventh (7th) Election District of Carroll County, Maryland; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to the conveyance of the easements as hereinafter described. NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DEED OF EASEMENT WITNESSETH, that for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the said Grantor does hereby grant and convey unto THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CARROLL COUNTY, MARYLAND, a body corporate and politic of the State of Maryland, its successors and assigns, a perpetual easement to allow the location, relocation, maintenance, repair, enlargement and replacement of pipes, headwalls, inlet ditches, outlet ditches, culverts, manholes, inlets, stormwater management, swales, backwater areas, and other drainage features upon, in, on, above, across, through, under and over such portion of Grantor’s land situate on Maryland Route No. 97, containing 1.6951 acres of land, more or less, and identified as “Construction Easement & Perpetual Maintenance Easement For Retrofit of Ex. SWM Pond” on a Plan entitled “WESTMINSTER HIGH SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION & PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT FOR SWM POND RETROFIT” (hereinafter referred to as “Plan”), which Plan is incorporated herein by reference, and on an Exhibit Plat entitled “WESTMINSTER HIGH SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION & PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT FOR SWM POND RETROFIT” (hereinafter referred to as “Plat”), which Plat is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. -
Arterial Trip Length Characteristics
Arterial Trip Length Characteristics Stanley E. Young, Dennis So Ting Fong Arterial Trip Length Characteristics Stanley E. Young Traffax, Inc. Dennis So Ting Fong Traffax, Inc. SBIR Phase 3 Transportation Research Project Traffax, Inc. September 2, 2016 D1.5 Arterial Trip Length Characteristics* Deliverable Reference: *Formerly titled Accessibility Measures Report Sensor Fusion and MOE Development for Off-Line Project Name: Traffic Analysis of Real Time Data Contractor: Traffax Inc Contract Number: DTFH61-14-C-00035 Contract Term Start 9/4/2014 Contract Term End 9/4/2017 Key Personnel Stan Young, Darcy Bullock, Dennis So Ting Fong Recommended Citation Young, S. E., and D. S. T. Fong. Arterial Trip Length Characteristics. Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284316560 Acknowledgments This work was supported by Traffax/USDOT SBIR DTFH6114C00035. The contents of this paper reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein, and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the sponsoring organizations. These contents do not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Approach ............................................................................................................................................... 4 3 Sample Data and Results......................................................................................................................